Enhancing ferroelectric stability: Wide-range of adaptive control in epitaxial HfO2/ZrO2 superlattices

Chang-Yang Kuo; Chao Zhou; Jingxuan Li; Jiyuan Yang; Kefan Wang; Liyang Ma; Shi Liu; Shiqing Deng; Sizhe Huang; Sujit Das

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 60 references

Enhancing ferroelectric stability: Wide-range of adaptive control in epitaxial HfO2/ZrO2 superlattices

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Epitaxial HfO2/ZrO2 superlattices preserve ferroelectricity from 4 to 100 nm, far beyond the usual hafnia limit.

desk verdict Epitaxial HfO2/ZrO2 superlattices show credible ferroelectricity to 100 nm, but the thick-film data need a leakage check before the headline claim is fully secure. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.00393 v1 pith:ZHHV3EUT submitted 2025-07-01 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Jingxuan Li , Shiqing Deng , Liyang Ma , Yangyang Si , Chao Zhou , Kefan Wang , Sizhe Huang , Jiyuan Yang

show 7 more authors

Yunlong Tang Yu-Chieh Ku Chang-Yang Kuo Yijie Li Sujit Das Shi Liu Zuhuang Chen

This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords ferroelectrichafniaHfO2/ZrO2superlatticepolarorthorhombicphasestabilityepitaxialthinfilmcoercivefieldfatigueendurancefirst-principlescalculations

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Epitaxial $(\mathrm{HfO}_2)_n/(\mathrm{ZrO}_2)_n$ superlattices with a short repeat period are reported to keep ferroelectricity across an unusually wide thickness range, from 4 nm to 100 nm, while conventional $\mathrm{Hf}_{0.5}\mathrm{Zr}_{0.5}\mathrm{O}_2$ solid-solution films lose it beyond roughly 10 nm. The best period ($n=3$) shows a remnant polarization around $15\ \mu\mathrm{C}/\mathrm{cm}^2$, a coercive field that drops to about $0.85$ MV/cm in thick films, and endurance beyond $10^9$ switching cycles. First-principles calculations attribute the stability to a kinetic barrier: when ZrO$_2$ is constrained by the ferroelectric orthorhombic lattice of neighboring HfO$_2$, the barrier for the transition to the stable non-ferroelectric monoclinic phase rises by about $273$ meV/f.u., while the barrier to the ferroelectric phase is nearly unchanged. The paper also computes an orthorhombic/monoclinic interface formation energy that is higher for the HfO$_2$-ZrO$_2$ interface than for an HZO solid-solution interface, giving a critical thickness of about 7 nm and, by extension, the ability of the polar phase to dominate at much larger thickness. If correct, this would extend the usable thickness window of hafnia-based ferroelectrics by an order of magnitude and lower the operating field for memory devices.

What carries the argument

The central object is the $(\mathrm{HfO}_2)_n/(\mathrm{ZrO}_2)_n$ superlattice grown epitaxially on LSMO-buffered SrTiO$_3$, with the period $n$ counted in unit cells and $n=3$ as the optimal value. The argument rests on two first-principles quantities: the kinetic energy barrier of the tetragonal-to-monoclinic transition in ZrO$_2$, which increases by about $273$ meV/f.u. when the ZrO$_2$ layer is clamped by the polar HfO$_2$ lattice while the barrier to the orthorhombic phase barely changes, and the orthorhombic/monoclinic interface formation energy, computed as $70.4$ meV/Å$^2$ for the HfO$_2$-ZrO$_2$ interface and $64.6$ meV/Å$^2$ for a comparable HZO interface. Comparing the interface energy with the bulk monoclinic-orthorhombic energy difference yields a critical thickness of about $7$ nm for the ferroelectric ZrO$_2$ layer; the paper uses this comparison to argue that the elemental discontinuity at the superlattice interfaces suppresses monoclinic-phase growth more effectively than a solid solution.

What would settle it

Measure the monoclinic-phase fraction by X-ray diffraction or cross-sectional TEM as a function of total thickness from 10 to 100 nm for the $n=3$ superlattice; if it rises steeply beyond the computed roughly 7 nm critical thickness, the proposed stabilization mechanism is contradicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a chemically sharp, epitaxial HfO$_2$/ZrO$_2$ superlattice suppresses the non-polar monoclinic phase through two computed mechanisms: the kinetic barrier for the tetragonal-to-monoclinic transition in ZrO$_2$ rises substantially when ZrO$_2$ is constrained by the polar lattice of HfO$_2$, while the barrier to the polar orthorhombic phase stays low, and the orthorhombic/monoclinic interface formation energy is high enough (70.4 meV/Å$^2$ for the HfO$_2$-ZrO$_2$ interface, versus 64.6 meV/Å$^2$ for a comparable HZO interface) to make monoclinic nucleation expensive during growth. The paper reports that the polar orthorhombic phase remains dominant up to 100 nm total thickness, with a polar-phase fraction above 80% at all measured thicknesses, and that the $n=3$ period gives the best ferroelectric response: remnant polarization near 15 $\mu$C/cm$^2$, stable switching over $10^9$ cycles, and a coercive field as low as $\sim0.85$ MV/cm in thick films. This is the paper's evidence that ordered superlattices, built from two paraelectric bulk oxides, offer a defect-free route to stable ferroelectricity in hafnia-based materials beyond the conventional thickness window.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that computer-modeled energy barriers and interface energies, calculated for a few atomic layers, determine which phase forms in the top 90 nm of a 100 nm film grown at 600 °C, even though the computed critical thickness is about 7 nm.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the stabilization mechanism is correct, hafnia-based ferroelectrics can be made tens of nanometres thick while keeping a low coercive field, which relaxes the voltage and leakage constraints of memory cells.
The reported endurance of more than $10^9$ cycles, with leakage current nearly unchanged, points to interfaces that block charged-defect migration and could yield more reliable ferroelectric memories.
Switching that is nearly independent of frequency and temperature is consistent with nucleation-limited switching, a property useful for high-temperature and neuromorphic electronics.
The $n=3$ design rule gives a recipe for maximizing the polar phase in fluorite-oxide superlattices and suggests that other paraelectric oxide pairs could be engineered the same way.
Two paraelectric bulk oxides can be combined into a ferroelectric without doping, offering a defect-free route to stabilize HfO$_2$ for CMOS-compatible devices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A direct test of the mechanism would be to grow the same superlattice on substrates with different lattice mismatches: if kinetic clamping by the HfO$_2$ lattice is the dominant stabilizer, the polar phase should persist with only weak strain dependence; if strain is dominant, the thickness window should collapse when the substrate constraint is removed.
The critical-thickness argument is computed for a thin (111) supercell; extending the first-principles calculations to much thicker supercells could show whether the o-m interface energy genuinely controls phase selection across the full 100 nm or whether strain relaxation and defect kinetics dominate in the upper layers.
The same elemental-discontinuity design could be transferred to other oxide pairs, such as HfO$_2$/CeO$_2$ or doped variants; testing whether a higher interface formation energy further widens the ferroelectric window would isolate the proposed control parameter.
The low coercive field at 100 nm, if reproducible in polycrystalline films on metal electrodes, would be the practical payoff for memory applications more than the epitaxial geometry itself.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: this is a paper worth taking seriously. The experimental picture is unusually complete—epitaxial (111) films, atomically sharp interfaces, no interdiffusion beyond one monolayer, and ferroelectric hysteresis in a 4 nm film. The n=3 superlattice keeps a clear polar phase at 100 nm, with a low coercive field (~0.85 MV/cm) and 10^9-cycle endurance at 6 nm. That is new. Earlier hafnia/zirconia superlattices were polycrystalline or ultrathin, and epitaxial hafnia usually loses polarization around 20 nm.

The weak spot is not the DFT mechanism, though you could read it that way. The paper's computed critical thickness of ~7 nm is for an individual ZrO2 layer, not for the whole stack. In the n=3 superlattice, each HfO2/ZrO2 period is only about 1–2 nm thick, repeated 55 times, so every layer stays below the threshold. The mechanism—interfacial o-m energy plus kinetic barriers suppresses m-phase nucleation—is internally consistent with the thickness range observed, and the calculations are first-principles, not fitted to the polarization.

The real soft spot is electrical. The 100 nm ferroelectricity claim rests on P-E loops and switching-current peaks at applied fields around 8.5 V. PUND and frequency-stability measurements are shown only for the 20 nm film. At those voltages, leakage or charge injection can produce loop shapes that look ferroelectric, even if the I-E curves show maxima. The authors do report low leakage for the superlattice, but only at 20 nm. That gap matters. It is fixable—add PUND and frequency-dependent loops on the 100 nm film—but without it, the headline claim is not fully secured.

Minor issues: the categorical statement that no epitaxial HfO2-based superlattices have been reported before needs verification; the "most exceptional ferroelectric properties" phrase in the results is too strong; and Figure 4e has no error bars even though the methods say each sample was measured multiple times.

Bottom line: if the 100 nm data survive a leakage check, this is a significant advance. The materials science is careful, the literature is engaged, and the mechanism makes sense once you map the critical thickness onto the individual layers. Send it to referees.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports epitaxial (HfO2)n/(ZrO2)n superlattices grown on LSMO-buffered SrTiO3 by pulsed laser deposition, with n = 2, 3, 6, 11, 16 and total thicknesses from 4 to 100 nm. Structural characterization (XRD, XRR, AFM, XAS/XLD, and atomic-resolution STEM/EDXS) indicates well-defined interfaces and a dominant polar orthorhombic phase, with n = 3 the optimal periodicity. Electrical measurements on ~20-nm films show ferroelectric P-E loops, I-E switching peaks, butterfly permittivity loops, PUND results, low leakage, and frequency/temperature stability; a 6-nm film is reported to survive 10^9 fatigue cycles. For thicker films, P-E loops and I-E peaks are reported up to 100 nm, with coercive field as low as ~0.85 MV/cm. DFT calculations examine kinetic barriers and o-m interface formation energies, giving a critical thickness of about 7 nm for an individual ZrO2 layer. The authors argue that kinetic barriers and interfacial energy stabilize the polar phase over a wide thickness range.

Significance. If fully substantiated, the results would significantly extend the thickness window of ferroelectric HfO2-based films, which is of technological relevance for memories and low-power electronics. The structural characterization is extensive and internally consistent, and the DFT calculation is first-principles and not fitted to the measured polarization, so there is no circularity in the theory-experiment comparison. However, the central thickness claim at 100 nm currently lacks leakage-excluded electrical evidence, and the theoretical mechanism as written does not directly bridge the per-layer critical thickness to the total film thickness. Both points are addressable with additional measurements and clearer modeling, and I would not reject the manuscript on the basis of the existing data alone.

major comments (3)

[Thickness variation ferroelectric properties of the superlattices (Fig. 4d)] The 100-nm ferroelectricity claim rests on the P-E hysteresis loops and I-E switching-current peaks in Fig. 4d, but PUND and frequency-dependent P-E measurements are shown only for the 20-nm n = 3 film (Supplementary Fig. S6 and Fig. 3f). Because thick films measured at high voltages can exhibit apparent polarization from leakage or charge injection, please provide leakage-excluded measurements for the 10-100 nm films (for example PUND, frequency-dependent P-E, or transient current analysis), or explicitly qualify the claim as loop-based evidence.
[The origin and stability of ferroelectricity in the superlattices (critical-thickness paragraph)] The calculated critical thickness of about 7.01 nm refers to an individual ZrO2 layer, whereas the experimental claim concerns a 100-nm total film assembled from 55 periods. The manuscript moves from the per-layer value to the conclusion that the superlattice can maintain the polar phase in thicker dimensions without a quantitative argument for the whole stack. I do not read the 7 nm number as a contradiction of 100-nm ferroelectricity, because each sublayer is below 7 nm, but the text should explicitly distinguish these two length scales and explain (or model) how repeated interfaces preserve the polar phase across the full 100-nm thickness.
[Abstract and Figure 4c] The abstract attributes excellent fatigue resistance exceeding 10^9 switching cycles to the optimized-period superlattices in the same sentence as the 100-nm thickness range, but the endurance data in Fig. 4c are for a 6-nm superlattice. Please state which thickness each headline claim refers to, and if no fatigue data exist for the 100-nm film, adjust the wording or add the corresponding measurement.

minor comments (4)

[Methods (electrode fabrication)] The Pt electrode diameter is given as 12.5 µm², which mixes diameter and area; the quantity should be a length (e.g., 12.5 µm) or an area such as 12.5 µm² for the electrode area.
[Results, periodicity dependence] The sentence 'the upper limit of periodicity for retaining ferroelectricity in the system is appears to be n = 16' contains a grammatical error ('is appears'); it should read 'appears to be n = 16'.
[Abstract and Figure 4d] The phrase 'maintain stable ferroelectricity from up to 100 nm' is awkward and should be 'at thicknesses up to 100 nm'.
[Figure 4d] The labels identifying the five thicknesses in the P-E loops of Fig. 4d are difficult to distinguish in the printed figure; using distinct colors with a clear legend would help.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity: the DFT barrier and interface-energy calculations are independent of the measured ferroelectric quantities, and the self-citations are background support only.

full rationale

The central claims of the paper are experimental: P-E and I-E loops, XRD phase fractions, PUND on the 20 nm films, endurance, and thickness-dependent electrical data. The theoretical component is a set of first-principles DFT calculations of phase-transition kinetic barriers and o-m interface formation energies in a (111)-oriented superlattice supercell. These calculations are not fitted to the measured polarization, coercive field, or phase fractions; the critical thickness of about 7 nm is derived by comparing a DFT-computed interface energy with a DFT-computed thermodynamic energy difference, not from the experimental data. The computed quantity is layer-wise: the 100 nm film is a 55-period stack of n=3 layers, each below the calculated critical thickness, so the comparison with experiment is coherent rather than circular. Self-citations to the authors' prior work appear in background discussions of oxygen-vacancy kinetics and strain stabilization, but the superlattice stabilization mechanism itself is supported by in-paper DFT and by the structural and electrical characterization. No equation defines a predicted quantity in terms of the measured quantity, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The main open concern, whether the 100 nm hysteresis loops are fully leakage-excluded without PUND on the thick film, is an experimental-validity issue, not a circularity issue.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The experimental claim is grounded in standard measurement methods. The theoretical explanation relies on DFT and a thermodynamic critical-thickness model; the model's quantitative failure at 100 nm means the mechanism is unproven. No parameters were fit in the DFT, but the model itself is a simplification of the growth process.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption DFT-PBE calculations provide reliable relative phase energies and kinetic barriers for HfO2/ZrO2 systems.
The mechanism argument relies on computed energy barriers and interface energies without benchmarking against experiment or higher-level theory.
domain assumption Superlattice interfaces are chemically sharp and defect-free enough that interface energy, not oxygen vacancy or strain relaxation, dominates phase selection.
STEM and EDXS show minimal interdiffusion, but oxygen vacancy effects are not measured, and the role of strain relaxation over 100 nm is not quantified.
domain assumption Phase selection is governed by an equilibrium-like competition between interface energy and bulk energy difference, yielding a critical thickness.
The model is static and ignores kinetic growth effects at 600 °C; the computed critical thickness of about 7 nm is far below the demonstrated 100 nm thickness.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Enhancing ferroelectric stability: Wide-range of adaptive control in epitaxial HfO2/ZrO2 superlattices." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZHHV3EUT

@misc{pith2026250700393,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Enhancing ferroelectric stability: Wide-range of adaptive control in epitaxial HfO2/ZrO2 superlattices},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZHHV3EUT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.00393}
}

read the original abstract

The metastability of the polar phase in HfO2, despite its excellent compatibility with the complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor process, remains a key obstacle for its industrial applications. Traditional stabilization approaches, such as doping, often induce crystal defects and impose constraints on the thickness of ferroelectric HfO2 thin films. These limitations render the ferroelectric properties vulnerable to degradation, particularly due to phase transitions under operational conditions. Here, we demonstrate robust ferroelectricity in high-quality epitaxial (HfO2)n/(ZrO2)n superlattices, which exhibit significantly enhanced ferroelectric stability across an extended thickness range. Optimized-period superlattices maintain stable ferroelectricity from up to 100 nm, excellent fatigue resistance exceeding 109 switching cycles, and a low coercive field of ~0.85 MV/cm. First-principles calculations reveal that the kinetic energy barrier of phase transition and interfacial formation energy are crucial factors in suppressing the formation of non-polar phases. This work establishes a versatile platform for exploring high-performance fluorite-structured superlattices and advances the integration of HfO2-based ferroelectrics into a broader range of applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.00393 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Structural characterizations of ~20-nm-thick epitaxial HfO2/ZrO2 superlattices. a, Schematic illustration of the lattice structure of HfO2/ZrO2 superlattices deposited on STO/LSMO (Methods). The same composition ratio was used to create a direct comparison between the ordered [HfO2]n/[ZrO2]n superlattices and the disordered Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 solid-solution films. b, XRD patterns of 20 nm superlattices with varying period… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Atomic-resolution STEM studies of the ~20-nm-thick HfO2/ZrO2 superlattice with n = 3. a, Atomically resolved HAADF-STEM image of the superlattice film. Inset shows the corresponding fast Fourier transform of the image, highlighting superstructure spots indicated by white arrows. b, Atomic-scale EDXS mapping of Hf M and Zr L- signals, revealing a chemically well-defined superlattice structure. c, Enlarged view of the… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Robust ferroelectricity in HfO2/ZrO2 superlattices and its microscopic origin. a, XRD patterns of the n = 3 superlattices with different total film thickness (4 -100 nm). b, P-E hysteresis loop, corresponding I-E curve and dielectric constantelectric field curve (inset) of 4 nm superlattice, which highlights the ferroelectricity of the superlattices at ultra-thin scales. c, Endurance performances of 6 nm HZO and su… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

[1]

Mikolajick, T., Slesazeck, S., Park, M.H

1. Mikolajick, T., Slesazeck, S., Park, M.H. & Schroeder, U. Ferroelectric hafnium oxide for ferroelectric random-access memories and ferroelectric field- effect transistors. MRS Bull. 43, 340-346 (2018)

work page 2018
[2]

& Bö ttger, U

Bö scke, T.S., Mü ller, J., Brä uhaus, D., Schrö der, U. & Bö ttger, U. Ferroelectricity in hafnium oxide thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 102903 (2011)

work page 2011
[3]

& Anthony, J.M

Wilk, G.D., Wallace, R.M. & Anthony, J.M. High -κ gate dielectrics: Current status and materials properties considerations. J. Appl. Phys. 89, 5243 -5275 (2001)

work page 2001
[4]

& Scheffler, M

Jiang, H., Gomez -Abal, R.I., Rinke, P. & Scheffler, M. Electronic band structure of zirconia and hafnia polymorphs from the GW perspective. Phys. Rev. B 81, 085119 (2010)

work page 2010
[5]

Steep-slope hysteresis-free negative capacitance MoS2 transistors

Si, M., et al. Steep-slope hysteresis-free negative capacitance MoS2 transistors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 24-28 (2018)

work page 2018
[6]

Hyuk Park, M. , et al. Evolution of phases and ferroelectric properties of thin Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 films according to the thickness and annealing temperature. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 242905 (2013)

work page 2013
[7]

Park, M.H. , et al. Study on the degradation mechanism of the ferroelectric properties of thin Hf 0.5Zr0.5O2 films on TiN and Ir electrodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 072902 (2014)

work page 2014
[8]

Grain size engineering for ferroelectric Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 films by an insertion of Al2O3 interlayer

Kim, H.J., et al. Grain size engineering for ferroelectric Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 films by an insertion of Al2O3 interlayer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 192903 (2014)

work page 2014

Show all 60 references

[9]

Impact of mechanical stress on ferroelectricity in Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 thin films

Shiraishi, T., et al. Impact of mechanical stress on ferroelectricity in Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 108, 262904 (2016)

2016
[10]

Wei, Y. , et al. A rhombohedral ferroelectric phase in epitaxially strained Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 thin films. Nat. Mater. 17, 1095-1100 (2018)

2018
[11]

Xu, X. , et al. Kinetically stabilized ferroelectricity in bulk single -crystalline HfO2:Y. Nat. Mater. 20, 826-832 (2021)

2021
[12]

Interface-engineered ferroelectricity of epitaxial Hf 0.5Zr0.5O2 thin films

Shi, S., et al. Interface-engineered ferroelectricity of epitaxial Hf 0.5Zr0.5O2 thin films. Nat. Commun. 14, 1780 (2023)

2023
[13]

Yu, L., Zhao, H.J., Chen, P., Bellaiche, L. & Ma, Y. The anti -symmetric and anisotropic symmetric exchange interactions between electric dipoles in hafnia. Nat. Commun. 14, 8127 (2023)

2023
[14]

& Ramprasad, R

Batra, R., Huan, T.D., Rossetti, G.A. & Ramprasad, R. Dopants Promoting Ferroelectricity in Hafnia: Insights from a comprehensive Chemical Space Exploration. Chem. Mat. 29, 9102-9109 (2017)

2017
[15]

& Liu, S

Ma, L.Y. & Liu, S. Structural Polymorphism Kinetics Promoted by Charged Oxygen Vacancies in HfO2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 096801 (2023)

2023
[16]

Zhou, C. , et al. Enhanced polarization switching characteristics of HfO 2 ultrathin films via acceptor-donor co-doping. Nat. Commun. 15, 2893 (2024)

2024
[17]

& Sanchez, F

Lyu, J., Song, T., Fina, I. & Sanchez, F. High polarization, endurance and retention in sub-5 nm Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 films. Nanoscale 12, 11280-11287 (2020)

2020
[18]

Intrinsic ferroelectricity in Y-doped HfO2 thin films

Yun, Y., et al. Intrinsic ferroelectricity in Y-doped HfO2 thin films. Nat. Mater. 21, 903-909 (2022)

2022
[19]

Materano, M. , et al. Influence of Oxygen Content on the Structure and Reliability of Ferroelectric Hf xZr1–xO2 Layers. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2, 3618-3626 (2020)

2020
[20]

Interplay between oxygen defects and dopants: effect on structure and performance of HfO2-based ferroelectrics

Materano, M., et al. Interplay between oxygen defects and dopants: effect on structure and performance of HfO2-based ferroelectrics. Inorg. Chem. Front. 8, 2650-2672 (2021)

2021
[21]

Zhang, Z. , et al. Phase Transformation Driven by Oxygen Vacancy Redistribution as the Mechanism of Ferroelectric Hf 0.5Zr0.5O2 Fatigue. Adv. Electron. Mater., 2300877 (2024)

2024
[22]

& Liu, S

Zhu, T., Deng, S. & Liu, S. Epitaxial ferroelectric hafnia stabilized by symmetry constraints. Phys. Rev. B 108, L060102 (2023)

2023
[23]

Mundy, J.A. , et al. Atomically engineered ferroic layers yield a room - temperature magnetoelectric multiferroic. Nature 537, 523-527 (2016)

2016
[24]

& Lowndes, D.H

Lee, H.N., Christen, H.M., Chisholm, M.F., Rouleau, C.M. & Lowndes, D.H. Strong polarization enhancement in asymmetric three -component ferroelectric superlattices. Nature 433, 395-399 (2005)

2005
[25]

Tian, Z. , et al. Tunable Artificial Relaxor Behavior in [BaTiO 3]m/[BaZrO3]n Superlattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 266801 (2023)

2023
[26]

& Schlom, D.G

Ramesh, R. & Schlom, D.G. Creating emergent phenomena in oxide superlattices. Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 257-268 (2019)

2019
[27]

Thin-Film Ferroelectrics

Fernandez, A., et al. Thin-Film Ferroelectrics. Adv Mater 34, e2108841 (2022)

2022
[28]

Cheema, S.S. , et al. Ultrathin ferroic HfO 2-ZrO2 superlattice gate stack for advanced transistors. Nature 604, 65-71 (2022)

2022
[29]

Cheema, S.S. , et al. Giant energy storage and power density negative capacitance superlattices. Nature 629, 803-809 (2024)

2024
[30]

Wu, M. , et al. Insights into oxygen vacancy dynamics in HfO 2–ZrO2 superlattice ferroelectric films: Implications for device reliability. J. Appl. Phys. 136, 144101 (2024)

2024
[31]

& Í ñ iguez -Gonzá lez, J

Mukherjee, B., Fedorova, N.S. & Í ñ iguez -Gonzá lez, J. First -principles predictions of HfO 2-based ferroelectric superlattices. npj Comput. Mater. 10, 153 (2024)

2024
[32]

Zhao, H.J. , et al. Creating Ferroelectricity in Monoclinic (HfO 2)1/(CeO2)1 Superlattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 256801 (2024)

2024
[33]

& Chiang, T

Weeks, S.L., Pal, A., Narasimhan, V.K., Littau, K.A. & Chiang, T. Engineering of Ferroelectric HfO 2-ZrO2 Nanolaminates. ACS Appl . Mater. Interfaces 9, 13440-13447 (2017)

2017
[34]

A comprehensive study on the mechanism of ferroelectric phase formation in hafnia-zirconia nanolaminates and superlattices

Park, M.H., et al. A comprehensive study on the mechanism of ferroelectric phase formation in hafnia-zirconia nanolaminates and superlattices. Appl. Phys. Rev. 6, 041403 (2019)

2019
[35]

Park, J.Y. , et al. Engineering Strategies in Emerging Fluorite -Structured Ferroelectrics. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 4, 1369-1380 (2021)

2021
[36]

Park, M.H. , et al. Surface and grain boundary energy as the key enabler of ferroelectricity in nanoscale hafnia -zirconia: a comparison of model and experiment. Nanoscale 9, 9973-9986 (2017)

2017
[37]

& Schroeder, U

Mikolajick, T. & Schroeder, U. Ferroelectricity in bulk hafnia. Nat. Mater. 20, 714-723 (2021)

2021
[38]

Enhanced ferroelectricity in ultrathin films grown directly on silicon

Cheema, S.S., et al. Enhanced ferroelectricity in ultrathin films grown directly on silicon. Nature 580, 478-482 (2020)

2020
[39]

Interfacial ferromagnetism in LaNiO3/CaMnO3 superlattices

Grutter, A.J., et al. Interfacial ferromagnetism in LaNiO3/CaMnO3 superlattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 087202 (2013)

2013
[40]

-Y., Jung, H

Cho, D. -Y., Jung, H. -S. & Hwang, C.S. Structural properties and electronic structure of HfO2-ZrO2 composite films. Phys. Rev. B 82, 094104 (2010)

2010
[41]

& Sá nchez, F

Lyu, J., Fina, I., Solanas, R., Fontcuberta, J. & Sá nchez, F. Growth Window of Ferroelectric Epitaxial Hf 0.5Zr0.5O2 Thin Films. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 1, 220-228 (2019)

2019
[42]

Understanding ferroelectric Al:HfO2 thin films with Si-based electrodes for 3D applications

Florent, K., et al. Understanding ferroelectric Al:HfO2 thin films with Si-based electrodes for 3D applications. J. Appl. Phys. 121, 204103 (2017)

2017
[43]

Ferroelectricity in Simple Binary ZrO 2 and HfO2

Muller, J., et al. Ferroelectricity in Simple Binary ZrO 2 and HfO2. Nano Lett. 12, 4318-4323 (2012)

2012
[44]

HfO2-ZrO2 Superlattice Ferroelectric Capacitor With Improved Endurance Performance and Higher Fatigue Recovery Capability

Peng, Y., et al. HfO2-ZrO2 Superlattice Ferroelectric Capacitor With Improved Endurance Performance and Higher Fatigue Recovery Capability. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 43, 216-219 (2022)

2022
[45]

ac dynamics of ferroelectric domains from an investigation of the frequency dependence of hysteresis loops

Yang, S.M., et al. ac dynamics of ferroelectric domains from an investigation of the frequency dependence of hysteresis loops. Phys. Rev. B 82, 174125 (2010)

2010
[46]

& Martin, L.W

Damodaran, A.R., Breckenfeld, E., Chen, Z., Lee, S. & Martin, L.W. Enhancement of ferroelectric Curie temperature in BaTiO 3 films via strain - induced defect dipole alignment. Adv. Mater. 26, 6341-6347 (2014)

2014
[47]

Buragohain, P. , et al. Nanoscopic studies of domain structure dynamics in ferroelectric La:HfO2 capacitors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 222901 (2018)

2018
[48]

Gong, N. , et al. Nucleation limited switching (NLS) model for HfO 2-based metal-ferroelectric-metal (MFM) capacitors: Switching kinetics and retention characteristics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 262903 (2018)

2018
[49]

Highly Enhanced Polarization Switching Speed in HfO 2‐based Ferroelectric Thin Films via a Composition Gradient Strategy

Hao, P., et al. Highly Enhanced Polarization Switching Speed in HfO 2‐based Ferroelectric Thin Films via a Composition Gradient Strategy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33, 2301746 (2023)

2023
[50]

-J., et al

Lee, H. -J., et al. Scale-free ferroelectricity induced by flat phonon bands in HfO2. Science 369, 1343–1347 (2020)

2020
[51]

& Rappe, A.M

Zhou, S., Zhang, J. & Rappe, A.M. Strain -induced antipolar phase in hafnia stabilizes robust thin-film ferroelectricity. Sci. Adv. 8, eadd5953 (2022)

2022
[52]

& Rappe, A.M

Shin, Y.H., Grinberg, I., Chen, I.W. & Rappe, A.M. Nucleation and growth mechanism of ferroelectric domain-wall motion. Nature 449, 881-884 (2007)

2007
[53]

-K., et al

Liang, Y. -K., et al. ZrO2-HfO2 Superlattice Ferroelectric Capacitors With Optimized Annealing to Achieve Extremely High Polarization Stability. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 43, 1451-1454 (2022)

2022
[54]

Katayama, K. , et al. Growth of (111) -oriented epitaxial and textured ferroelectric Y-doped HfO2 films for downscaled devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 112901 (2016)

2016
[55]

The demonstration of significant ferroelectricity in epitaxial Y-doped HfO2 film

Shimizu, T., et al. The demonstration of significant ferroelectricity in epitaxial Y-doped HfO2 film. Sci. Rep. 6, 32931 (2016)

2016
[56]

Epitaxial Ferroelectric Hf 0.5Zr0.5O2 Thin Films and Their Implementations in Memristors for Brain‐Inspired Computing

Yoong, H.Y., et al. Epitaxial Ferroelectric Hf 0.5Zr0.5O2 Thin Films and Their Implementations in Memristors for Brain‐Inspired Computing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1806037 (2018)

2018
[57]

Lyu, J. , et al. Enhanced ferroelectricity in epitaxial Hf 0.5Zr0.5O2 thin films integrated with Si(001) using SrTiO 3 templates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 114, 222901 (2019)

2019
[58]

Engineering Ferroelectric Hf 0.5Zr0.5O2 Thin Films by Epitaxial Stress

Estandí a, S., et al. Engineering Ferroelectric Hf 0.5Zr0.5O2 Thin Films by Epitaxial Stress. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 1, 1449-1457 (2019)

2019
[59]

Ferroelectric Properties and Polarization Fatigue of La:HfO2 Thin‐ Film Capacitors

Li, X., et al. Ferroelectric Properties and Polarization Fatigue of La:HfO2 Thin‐ Film Capacitors. Phys. Status Solidi – R 15, 2000481 (2021)

2021
[60]

the Fundamental Research Funds for t he Central Universities

Cheema, S.S. , et al. Emergent ferroelectricity in subnanometer binary oxide films on silicon. Science 376, 648-652 (2022). Acknowledgments This work was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2021YFA1202100), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Gr...

2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Mikolajick, T., Slesazeck, S., Park, M.H

1. Mikolajick, T., Slesazeck, S., Park, M.H. & Schroeder, U. Ferroelectric hafnium oxide for ferroelectric random-access memories and ferroelectric field- effect transistors. MRS Bull. 43, 340-346 (2018)

work page 2018

[2] [2]

& Bö ttger, U

Bö scke, T.S., Mü ller, J., Brä uhaus, D., Schrö der, U. & Bö ttger, U. Ferroelectricity in hafnium oxide thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 102903 (2011)

work page 2011

[3] [3]

& Anthony, J.M

Wilk, G.D., Wallace, R.M. & Anthony, J.M. High -κ gate dielectrics: Current status and materials properties considerations. J. Appl. Phys. 89, 5243 -5275 (2001)

work page 2001

[4] [4]

& Scheffler, M

Jiang, H., Gomez -Abal, R.I., Rinke, P. & Scheffler, M. Electronic band structure of zirconia and hafnia polymorphs from the GW perspective. Phys. Rev. B 81, 085119 (2010)

work page 2010

[5] [5]

Steep-slope hysteresis-free negative capacitance MoS2 transistors

Si, M., et al. Steep-slope hysteresis-free negative capacitance MoS2 transistors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 24-28 (2018)

work page 2018

[6] [6]

Hyuk Park, M. , et al. Evolution of phases and ferroelectric properties of thin Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 films according to the thickness and annealing temperature. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 242905 (2013)

work page 2013

[7] [7]

Park, M.H. , et al. Study on the degradation mechanism of the ferroelectric properties of thin Hf 0.5Zr0.5O2 films on TiN and Ir electrodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 072902 (2014)

work page 2014

[8] [8]

Grain size engineering for ferroelectric Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 films by an insertion of Al2O3 interlayer

Kim, H.J., et al. Grain size engineering for ferroelectric Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 films by an insertion of Al2O3 interlayer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 192903 (2014)

work page 2014