Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Coexisting Flux String Vacua from Numerical K\"ahler Moduli Stabilisation

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A fixed flux configuration can support two different metastable vacua, so vacuum tunnelling can occur without changing the fluxes.

desk verdict A solid, honest numerical study that discovers coexisting moduli vacua at EFT level; the 'single flux configuration' framing needs UV input to be fully earned. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.00615 v1 pith:XQLOQGIE submitted 2025-07-01 hep-th hep-ph

Shehu AbdusSalam , Christopher Hughes , Fernando Quevedo , Andreas Schachner This is my paper
classification hep-thhep-ph
keywords TypeIIBfluxcompactificationsKählermodulistabilisationKKLTminimaLargeVolumeScenariocoexistingvacuadeSitterCalabi-Yauorientifoldsvacuumtunnelling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to show that a single, fixed choice of fluxes and background parameters in Type IIB string compactifications can support more than one metastable vacuum for the Kähler moduli. Using a fast numerical pipeline across more than 80,000 Calabi-Yau threefolds with up to six Kähler moduli, the authors reproduce the three established stabilisation scenarios — small-volume KKLT, large-volume LVS, and Kähler uplift — and identify parameter regions where two of them coexist in the same scalar potential. After adding an explicit anti-D3-brane uplift term, the coexisting pair can be tuned into any combination of AdS, Minkowski, and de Sitter minima. If correct, this means vacuum decay between different cosmological-constant vacua can be studied within one flux configuration, without invoking transitions between different flux choices.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the four-dimensional $N=1$ supergravity scalar potential for the Kähler moduli, $V=e^K(K^{i\bar j}D_iW\bar D_{\bar j}W-3|W|^2)$, built from a Kähler potential with the classical volume plus the leading $(\alpha')^3$ correction and a logarithmic volume redefinition, and a superpotential $W=W_0+\sum_D A_D e^{-a_D T_D}$. The numerical pipeline differentiates this potential automatically, samples starting points inside the Kähler cone by linear programming, solves both the F-term equations $D_iW=0$ and the full extremum equations $\partial_i V=0$, and validates candidates by checking the Kähler-cone inequalities and positivity of the Hessian. Coexistence emerges from the competition between non-perturbative $e^{-aT}$ terms, which dominate at small volume, and perturbative corrections, which dominate at large volume; the crossing of these two regimes in an intermediate $|W_0|$ window is what puts two minima in one potential.

What would settle it

Recompute the potential (2.16) for $\mathbb{P}^4[1,1,1,6,9][18]$ with the same $g_s$, $W_0$, and $\alpha$ but with the non-perturbative term for the large four-cycle removed; if both minima no longer coexist, the claim rests entirely on that cycle's rigidity. A direct check of whether that divisor has deformation modes that cannot be lifted by allowed worldvolume fluxes would settle the assumption.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for intermediate values of the flux superpotential $W_0$, the same Kähler-moduli scalar potential contains two local minima belonging to different stabilisation scenarios: a small-volume minimum of KKLT or Kähler-uplifted type and a large-volume minimum of LVS type. The paper demonstrates this explicitly on the $h^{1,1}=2$ example $\mathbb{P}^4[1,1,1,6,9][18]$, where one scan of the $(g_s,W_0)$ plane produced 14,819 coexisting pairs, and reports that LVS-type vacua pair with either KKLT or Kähler-uplifted vacua, never the latter two with each other. Adding $V_{\rm up}=D_{\rm up}/\mathcal{V}^{4/3}$ allows both branches to be lifted independently, giving dS+Minkowski, dS+AdS, and AdS+AdS combinations within one potential, with the small-volume minimum either deeper or shallower than the large-volume one.

Load-bearing premise

Every Kähler modulus must receive a non-perturbative superpotential term, which requires the associated four-cycle to be rigid or rigidifiable; if the large four-cycle in the main worked example is not actually rigid, the coexisting minima shown there would not both appear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Tunnelling rates can now be computed between two minima of the same potential, for example from a small-volume de Sitter vacuum to a large-volume LVS minimum, using concrete potentials where the saddle points are known.
  • By tuning the anti-D3 uplift coefficient, any combination of AdS, Minkowski, and de Sitter minima can be realised simultaneously in one flux configuration, so dS vacua need not be compared across different flux choices.
  • As $|W_0|$ is decreased, the LVS minimum shrinks and eventually disappears while the KKLT minimum survives and deepens, confirming that these potentials do not develop a bubble-of-nothing runaway.
  • Since the coexisting pairs appear for any geometry that supports an LVS-type vacuum, the effect is expected across many of the scanned threefolds with $2\leq h^{1,1}\leq 6$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: if coexisting minima are this common, landscape population dynamics should include decays within one flux sector; such intra-flux decays could change estimates of which vacua dominate and how long metastable dS vacua survive.
  • Inference: the $|W_0|$ window where the KKLT and LVS branches exchange dominance makes the potential nearly flat between two minima, a natural starting point for volume-modulus inflation models and for kination cosmologies after the saddle disappears.
  • Inference: the double-minimum window depends on the assumed positive logarithmic correction to the volume; scanning negative values of its coefficient $\alpha$ would reveal whether coexistence is robust or an artefact of that ansatz.
  • Inference: the coexisting dS and AdS minima with different volumes provide concrete realisations of the Euclidean AdS-wormhole seed for inflation discussed in the literature, since that mechanism requires exactly a dS vacuum alongside a lower AdS vacuum.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper develops a JAX-based numerical framework, using automatic differentiation and just-in-time compilation, to compute and minimise the Type IIB Kähler-moduli scalar potential. The potential includes the BBHL alpha-prime correction, a logarithmic volume correction, non-perturbative superpotential terms, and optionally an anti-D3 uplift term. The authors scan Calabi-Yau orientifolds with h^{1,1} ≤ 6 from the Kreuzer-Skarke database, over ranges of the flux superpotential W0 and string coupling gs, and report reproduction of KKLT, LVS, Kähler-uplifted, and LVS-like hybrid vacua. The principal new claim is that a single scalar potential, for fixed UV parameters, can contain two local minima of different types (e.g., KKLT+LVS or Kähler-uplifted+LVS), and that upon adding an explicit uplift term one can realise all combinations of AdS, Minkowski, and dS vacua. The paper proposes these configurations as a novel setting for vacuum transitions within a fixed flux configuration.

Significance. If fully established, the coexistence result is a valuable step: previous analyses of transitions between string vacua mostly involved distinct flux choices or decay to decompactification, whereas here two metastable minima coexist in a single effective potential. The EFT-level numerical work is largely credible: minima are checked for Hessian positivity and Kähler-cone membership, and the recovered scaling relations (e.g., LVS τ_s ~ a_s^{-1} ln V, τ_b ~ V^{2/3}; KKLT volume vs |W0|) match analytic expectations. The framework's modularity and use of automatic differentiation are genuine technical assets. However, the headline interpretation as 'coexisting vacua in a single flux configuration' is not yet supported, because the UV parameters (W0, gs, e^{K_cs}, Ai, ai, alpha, D_up) are scanned inputs rather than derived from explicit 3-form flux data; this is acknowledged in part by §2.1 and footnote 10. The significance is therefore conditional on the missing flux realisation.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.4 (with §2.1)] The paper's central claim that the coexisting minima belong to 'a single flux configuration' is not yet demonstrated. In Fig. 11 and throughout §4.4, the parameters W0, gs, e^{K_cs}, Ai, ai and alpha are scanned as independent inputs, while §2.1 states that complex-structure and dilaton stabilisation is assumed, not performed. No explicit choice of 3-form fluxes is constructed that yields the required values (e.g., W0 ≈ -0.024, gs ≈ 0.055, e^{K_cs} ≈ 0.03 for the left panel of Fig. 11) on P4[1,1,1,6,9][18] or any other Calabi-Yau, nor is the D3-tadpole constraint checked for such a point. Consequently, the coexisting minima are demonstrated properties of an assumed effective potential, not of a demonstrated Type IIB flux compactification. The authors should either provide a concrete flux realisation (or a parametric argument that flux choices in the required range exist) or state clearly in the abstract and conclusions that the results apply to the EFT at scanned parameter values.
  2. [§4.1, footnote 10] The analysis assumes that all h^{1,1} Kähler moduli contribute non-perturbatively to the superpotential (2.12), i.e., each corresponding 4-cycle is rigid or can be rigidified. Footnote 10 concedes that this has not been verified for small h^{1,1}. The featured coexistence examples use P4[1,1,1,6,9][18] with h^{1,1}=2 (Figs. 11-15); if either of these two divisor classes cannot support ED3 instantons or gaugino condensation, the non-perturbative superpotential would contain only one exponential term and the KKLT-LVS coexistence shown in these figures would not occur in the stated form. The authors should verify rigidity/rigidifiability for the specific geometries used in the headline examples, or restrict the claim accordingly.
  3. [§4.5, Eq. (4.17)] The uplift term V_up = D_up / V^{4/3} is introduced in Eq. (4.17) with D_up left as a free parameter; no computation of D_up from an explicit anti-D3-brane construction or alternative uplift is provided, and consistency with the D3-tadpole and warping constraints (see refs. [68-72]) is not checked. Since the claim that 'all combinations of AdS, Minkowski, and dS vacua' can be realised in a single potential depends directly on scanning D_up, the uplifted multi-vacuum configurations remain an EFT-level demonstration. A consistency check or an explicit construction for at least one D_up value would be needed to support the abstract's wording about de Sitter vacua in explicit flux compactifications.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.3] The validation description says minima are checked for Hessian positivity and Kähler-cone membership; it would be useful to state how the Hessian is computed (e.g., via automatic differentiation) and how near-zero eigenvalues are treated numerically, particularly in flat directions.
  2. [§4.5] The sentence 'As described in §4.2 and §4.2' presumably should refer to §4.2 and §4.4; please correct the cross-reference.
  3. [Fig. 13 caption] The phrase 'we can seen in the second plot' should read 'we can see in the second plot'.
  4. [§5.2] The bullet 'Not bubble of nothing decay' is grammatically unclear; 'No bubble-of-nothing decay' would be clearer.
  5. [Eq. (5.2)] The decay-rate formula for dS-to-Minkowski tunnelling involves S(phi0)/(1+(4V0/3 sigma^2)^2); the form is not immediately recognisable from standard Coleman-De Luccia expressions, and the stated sign flip for Minkowski-to-AdS decay deserves a derivation or a reference.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the coexisting-minima result is solved from the stated EFT potential, not fitted into it.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that, for fixed input parameters (gs, W0, Ai, ai, alpha, and Calabi-Yau data), the same scalar potential admits both a KKLT-like and an LVS-like minimum. The derivation chain begins with the Kähler potential (2.10), the superpotential (2.12), and the perturbative corrections (2.13), from which the full scalar potential (2.9) is computed directly using automatic differentiation (Sec. 3.2). The paper states: 'our numerical implementation does not use (2.16), but rather derives (2.9) directly.' The minimisation is performed over the moduli fields, not over the potential parameters, so the reported minima in Figs. 11-16 are genuine outputs of the potential rather than values imposed by construction. The paper also validates its pipeline by reproducing established scenarios with fixed literature parameters: KKLT with Eq. (4.1), LVS with Eq. (4.5), and the Rummel-Westphal dS trajectory of Ref. [60] with the same parameters as that reference. These reproductions use external, non-fitted input values and therefore do not constitute a fitted-input-called-prediction loop. Self-citations in the paper are peripheral: Ref. [13] (which shares two authors) is cited for hybrid minima and the analytic potential, Ref. [15] (sharing one author) for JAXVacua, and Ref. [25] (sharing one author) in footnote 1 as a motivational remark about coexisting complex-structure flux vacua. None of these citations supplies the central coexistence result, and no uniqueness theorem is invoked to force the choice of vacuum. The paper itself contains explicit caveats, but these are limitations rather than circularity: Sec. 4.1 footnote 10 assumes all h^{1,1} Kähler moduli contribute non-perturbatively and admits this is unverified for small h^{1,1}; Sec. 2.2 footnote 4 notes that logarithmic corrections are not yet fully established; and Sec. 2.1 assumes complex-structure moduli and the dilaton are stabilised before integrating them out. The skeptic's concern that no explicit 3-form flux data realising the scanned values of W0, gs, and e^{Kcs} is provided is a real UV-completeness gap, but it is not an identity between output and input. For these reasons, the paper shows no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central coexistence claim rests on a specific EFT ansatz: a Kähler potential with BBHL and logarithmic corrections, a non-perturbative superpotential with one exponential per modulus, constants W0, gs, e^{K_cs}, Ai, ai, and an optional anti-D3 uplift. These inputs are scanned or hand-set rather than derived from explicit flux data, so the ledger lists them as free parameters or domain assumptions. No new particles, forces, dimensions, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (7)
  • W0 (flux superpotential) = scanned over 10^-15 to 10^2, e.g. -0.024, -0.628, -1.23
    Treated as a tunable input parameter; not derived from explicit 3-form flux quanta, so the claim of explicit realisations depends on the existence of fluxes realising these values.
  • gs (string coupling) = scanned over 0.03 to 0.3, e.g. 0.1, 0.055, 0.075
    Chosen by hand; fixed by dilaton stabilisation in a full construction, which is not performed here.
  • alpha (log correction coefficient) = 0.1 for most scans; 10^-6 for coexisting minima scans
    Parameter of the unproven logarithmic correction in Eq. (2.15); the paper assumes it is small and positive without a microscopic derivation.
  • A_i (Pfaffian prefactors) = 1 for most, {1.11, 1} in the [60] comparisons
    Set by hand; no computation from microphysics.
  • a_i = 2 pi / c_D = choices c_D = 20, 22, 24
    Dual Coxeter numbers chosen by hand; they control the exponential decay and hence the vacuum positions.
  • e^{K_cs} = 0.03 in [60] comparison figures
    Complex-structure Kähler factor set to a fixed value; not computed from a flux vacuum.
  • D_up (uplift strength) = tuned, e.g. 2.82e-7
    Free parameter modelling anti-D3 uplift; not derived from a warped throat construction.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The four-dimensional N=1 effective supergravity potential with K in (2.10) and W in (2.12) correctly captures the Kähler moduli dynamics.
    Used throughout Sections 2 to 5 to define the scalar potential being minimised.
  • domain assumption Complex structure moduli and the axio-dilaton are stabilised supersymmetrically at high scale, with constant W0 and Kcs and no backreaction on the Kähler sector.
    Stated in Section 2.1 after Eq. (2.8); the numerical scan only treats the Kähler moduli.
  • ad hoc to paper All h^{1,1} Kähler moduli receive non-perturbative superpotential contributions from rigid or rigidified divisors.
    Section 4.1 footnote; explicitly stated to apply only to rigid/rigidified cases, and not verified for each geometry in the scan.
  • ad hoc to paper The logarithmic correction delta V_log = -alpha (V^(0))^(2/3) ln V^(0) with alpha > 0 is a valid correction to the Kähler potential.
    Section 2.2 footnote 4; the paper states the microscopic origin remains an open question.
  • domain assumption The alpha' and g_s expansions are under control at the found minima.
    Required for the EFT to be valid; the example in Eq. (4.10) has delta V_BBHL / V ~ 0.5, violating this assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Coexisting Flux String Vacua from Numerical K\"ahler Moduli Stabilisation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XQLOQGIE

@misc{pith2026250700615,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Coexisting Flux String Vacua from Numerical K\"ahler Moduli Stabilisation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XQLOQGIE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.00615}
}
abstract

We present a comprehensive study of K\"ahler moduli stabilisation in Type IIB flux compactifications, combining advanced numerical techniques with analytical methods. Our JAX-based computational framework enables efficient scanning of the UV parameter space, while incorporating $\alpha'$ corrections, loop and non-perturbative effects, as well as uplift contributions to the scalar potential. The implementation features rigorous vacuum validation protocols derived from analytic results. We apply our methods to explicit flux compactifications on more than 80,000 Calabi-Yau threefolds with $h^{1,1}\leq 6$ K\"ahler moduli. By systematically scanning over a wide range of values of the flux superpotential $W_0$ and the string coupling $g_s$, we find explicit realisations of every established K\"ahler moduli stabilisation scenario: for $10^{-15} \leq |W_0| \leq 10^{-2}$ we obtain both KKLT-like and K\"ahler uplifted vacua, while for the broader range $10^{-1} \leq |W_0| \leq 10^2$ we recover LVS as well as LVS-like hybrid solutions. Notably, we discover significant parameter regions where multiple vacua coexist within a single flux potential, including novel configurations pairing AdS, Minkowski, and dS minima with different volume hierarchies. These findings enable, for the first time, the analysis of vacuum decay processes within fixed flux configurations, complementing the established theory of transitions between distinct flux vacua and decays towards decompactification.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Menagerie of Wormholes and Cosmologies in the Gravitational Path Integral

    hep-th 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper identifies a variety of Euclidean saddle solutions including wormholes and oscillatory configurations in Einstein-Scalar-Maxwell models, demonstrates how oscillations are controlled by lifting flat potential...

  2. Fibre Inflation Meets Quintessence: Implications of Perturbative Stabilisation

    hep-th 2025-11 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Adding a base-modulus redefinition to fibre inflation in perturbative LVS shifts (ns, r) into ACT-allowed territory and yields an axion quintessence companion.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [11]

    Scanning the Landscape of Flux Compactifications: Vacuum Structure and Soft Supersymmetry Breaking

    S. S. AbdusSalam, J. P. Conlon, F. Quevedo, and K. Suruliz, “Scanning the Landscape of Flux Compactifications: Vacuum Structure and Soft Supersymmetry Breaking,” JHEP 12 (2007) 036, arXiv:0709.0221 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2007

  2. [13]

    A systematic approach to K¨ ahler moduli stabilisation,

    S. AbdusSalam, S. Abel, M. Cicoli, F. Quevedo, and P. Shukla, “A systematic approach to K¨ ahler moduli stabilisation,” JHEP 08 no. 08, (2020) 047, arXiv:2005.11329 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  3. [18]

    Gauge Threshold Corrections for Local Orientifolds,

    J. P. Conlon and E. Palti, “Gauge Threshold Corrections for Local Orientifolds,” JHEP 09 (2009) 019, arXiv:0906.1920 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2009

  4. [1]

    Hierarchies from fluxes in string compactifications,

    S. B. Giddings, S. Kachru, and J. Polchinski, “Hierarchies from fluxes in string compactifications,” Phys. Rev. D66 (2002) 106006, arXiv:hep-th/0105097

    arXiv 2002

  5. [2]

    De Sitter vacua in string theory,

    S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde, and S. P. Trivedi, “De Sitter vacua in string theory,” Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 046005, arXiv:hep-th/0301240

    arXiv 2003

  6. [3]

    Systematics of moduli stabilisation in Calabi-Yau flux compactifications,

    V. Balasubramanian, P. Berglund, J. P. Conlon, and F. Quevedo, “Systematics of moduli stabilisation in Calabi-Yau flux compactifications,” JHEP 03 (2005) 007, arXiv:hep-th/0502058

    arXiv 2005

  7. [4]

    Large-volume flux compactifications: Moduli spectrum and D3/D7 soft supersymmetry breaking,

    J. P. Conlon, F. Quevedo, and K. Suruliz, “Large-volume flux compactifications: Moduli spectrum and D3/D7 soft supersymmetry breaking,” JHEP 08 (2005) 007, arXiv:hep-th/0505076

    arXiv 2005

  8. [5]

    Soft SUSY Breaking Terms for Chiral Matter in IIB String Compactifications,

    J. P. Conlon, S. S. Abdussalam, F. Quevedo, and K. Suruliz, “Soft SUSY Breaking Terms for Chiral Matter in IIB String Compactifications,” JHEP 01 (2007) 032, arXiv:hep-th/0610129

    arXiv 2007

Show all 94 references
  1. [6]

    Flux compactification,

    M. R. Douglas and S. Kachru, “Flux compactification,” Rev. Mod. Phys.79 (2007) 733–796, arXiv:hep-th/0610102

    2007 arXiv

  2. [7]

    Lectures on constructing string vacua,

    F. Denef, “Lectures on constructing string vacua,” Les Houches87 (2008) 483–610, arXiv:0803.1194 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  3. [8]

    Moduli Stabilization in String Theory,

    L. McAllister and F. Quevedo, “Moduli Stabilization in String Theory,” arXiv:2310.20559 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  4. [9]

    Candidate de Sitter Vacua,

    L. McAllister, J. Moritz, R. Nally, and A. Schachner, “Candidate de Sitter Vacua,” arXiv:2406.13751 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  5. [10]

    de Sitter string vacua from Kahler uplifting,

    A. Westphal, “de Sitter string vacua from Kahler uplifting,” JHEP 03 (2007) 102, arXiv:hep-th/0611332

    2007 arXiv

  6. [12]

    D-Branes at del Pezzo Singularities: Global Embedding and Moduli Stabilisation,

    M. Cicoli, S. Krippendorf, C. Mayrhofer, F. Quevedo, and R. Valandro, “D-Branes at del Pezzo Singularities: Global Embedding and Moduli Stabilisation,” JHEP 09 (2012) 019, arXiv:1206.5237 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Small cosmological constants in string theory,

    M. Demirtas, M. Kim, L. McAllister, J. Moritz, and A. Rios-Tascon, “Small cosmological constants in string theory,” JHEP 12 (2021) 136, arXiv:2107.09064 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  8. [15]

    JAXVacua — a framework for sampling string vacua,

    A. Dubey, S. Krippendorf, and A. Schachner, “JAXVacua — a framework for sampling string vacua,” JHEP 12 (2023) 146, arXiv:2306.06160 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  9. [16]

    JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs,

    J. Bradbury, R. Frostig, P. Hawkins, M. J. Johnson, C. Leary, D. Maclaurin, G. Necula, A. Paszke, J. VanderPlas, S. Wanderman-Milne, and Q. Zhang, “JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs,” 2018. http://github.com/jax-ml/jax

    2018

  10. [17]

    Supersymmetry breaking and alpha-prime corrections to flux induced potentials,

    K. Becker, M. Becker, M. Haack, and J. Louis, “Supersymmetry breaking and alpha-prime corrections to flux induced potentials,” JHEP 06 (2002) 060, arXiv:hep-th/0204254

    2002 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Moduli Redefinitions and Moduli Stabilisation,

    J. P. Conlon and F. G. Pedro, “Moduli Redefinitions and Moduli Stabilisation,” JHEP 06 (2010) 082, arXiv:1003.0388 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  12. [20]

    De Sitter from T-branes,

    M. Cicoli, F. Quevedo, and R. Valandro, “De Sitter from T-branes,” JHEP 03 (2016) 141, arXiv:1512.04558 [hep-th]. – 26 –

    2016 arXiv

  13. [21]

    String loop corrections to Kahler potentials in orientifolds,

    M. Berg, M. Haack, and B. Kors, “String loop corrections to Kahler potentials in orientifolds,” JHEP 11 (2005) 030, arXiv:hep-th/0508043

    2005 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Complete classification of reflexive polyhedra in four-dimensions,

    M. Kreuzer and H. Skarke, “Complete classification of reflexive polyhedra in four-dimensions,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.4 (2000) 1209–1230, arXiv:hep-th/0002240

    2000 arXiv

  15. [23]

    A database of Calabi-Yau orientifolds and the size of D3-tadpoles,

    C. Crin` o, F. Quevedo, A. Schachner, and R. Valandro, “A database of Calabi-Yau orientifolds and the size of D3-tadpoles,” JHEP 08 (2022) 050, arXiv:2204.13115 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Stringy corrections to Kahler potentials, SUSY breaking, and the cosmological constant problem,

    V. Balasubramanian and P. Berglund, “Stringy corrections to Kahler potentials, SUSY breaking, and the cosmological constant problem,” JHEP 11 (2004) 085, arXiv:hep-th/0408054

    2004 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Deep observations of the Type IIB flux landscape,

    A. Chauhan, M. Cicoli, S. Krippendorf, A. Maharana, P. Piantadosi, and A. Schachner, “Deep observations of the Type IIB flux landscape,” arXiv:2501.03984 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    Quantization of four form fluxes and dynamical neutralization of the cosmological constant,

    R. Bousso and J. Polchinski, “Quantization of four form fluxes and dynamical neutralization of the cosmological constant,” JHEP 06 (2000) 006, arXiv:hep-th/0004134

    2000 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Orientifolding Kreuzer-Skarke,

    J. Moritz, “Orientifolding Kreuzer-Skarke,” arXiv:2305.06363 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    On the intermediate Jacobian of M5-branes,

    P. Jefferson and M. Kim, “On the intermediate Jacobian of M5-branes,” JHEP 05 (2024) 180, arXiv:2211.00210 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Geometry of Type II Superstrings and the Moduli of Superconformal Field Theories,

    S. Cecotti, S. Ferrara, and L. Girardello, “Geometry of Type II Superstrings and the Moduli of Superconformal Field Theories,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A4 (1989) 2475

    1989

  22. [30]

    The Effective action of N = 1 Calabi-Yau orientifolds,

    T. W. Grimm and J. Louis, “The Effective action of N = 1 Calabi-Yau orientifolds,” Nucl. Phys. B 699 (2004) 387–426, arXiv:hep-th/0403067

    2004 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Nonperturbative corrections to 4D string theory effective actions from SL(2,Z) duality and supersymmetry,

    D. Robles-Llana, M. Rocek, F. Saueressig, U. Theis, and S. Vandoren, “Nonperturbative corrections to 4D string theory effective actions from SL(2,Z) duality and supersymmetry,” Phys. Rev. Lett.98 (2007) 211602, arXiv:hep-th/0612027

    2007 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Membrane instantons from mirror symmetry,

    D. Robles-Llana, F. Saueressig, U. Theis, and S. Vandoren, “Membrane instantons from mirror symmetry,” Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.1 (2007) 681–711, arXiv:0707.0838 [hep-th]

    2007 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Non-Perturbative Corrections and Modularity in N=1 Type IIB Compactifications,

    T. W. Grimm, “Non-Perturbative Corrections and Modularity in N=1 Type IIB Compactifications,” JHEP 10 (2007) 004, arXiv:0705.3253 [hep-th]

    2007 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Instanton Corrections and Emergent Strings,

    F. Baume, F. Marchesano, and M. Wiesner, “Instanton Corrections and Emergent Strings,” JHEP 04 (2020) 174, arXiv:1912.02218 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Instantons and infinite distances,

    F. Marchesano and M. Wiesner, “Instantons and infinite distances,” JHEP 08 (2019) 088, arXiv:1904.04848 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  28. [36]

    The Kreuzer-Skarke Axiverse,

    M. Demirtas, C. Long, L. McAllister, and M. Stillman, “The Kreuzer-Skarke Axiverse,” JHEP 04 (2020) 138, arXiv:1808.01282 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  29. [37]

    W0 sample = np.random.normal(0,1)?,

    J. Ebelt, S. Krippendorf, and A. Schachner, “W0 sample = np.random.normal(0,1)?,” Phys. Lett. B 855 (2024) 138786, arXiv:2307.15749 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Flux vacua of the mirror octic,

    E. Plauschinn and L. Schlechter, “Flux vacua of the mirror octic,” JHEP 01 (2024) 157, arXiv:2310.06040 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    New non-supersymmetric flux vacua in string theory,

    S. Krippendorf and A. Schachner, “New non-supersymmetric flux vacua in string theory,” JHEP 12 (2023) 145, arXiv:2308.15525 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    CFT’s from Calabi-Yau four folds,

    S. Gukov, C. Vafa, and E. Witten, “CFT’s from Calabi-Yau four folds,” Nucl. Phys. B584 (2000) 69–108, arXiv:hep-th/9906070. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 608, 477–478 (2001)]

    2000 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Nonperturbative superpotentials in string theory,

    E. Witten, “Nonperturbative superpotentials in string theory,” Nucl. Phys. B474 (1996) 343–360, arXiv:hep-th/9604030

    1996 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Superpotentials from singular divisors,

    N. Gendler, M. Kim, L. McAllister, J. Moritz, and M. Stillman, “Superpotentials from singular divisors,” JHEP 11 (2022) 142, arXiv:2204.06566 [hep-th]. – 27 –

    2022 arXiv

  35. [43]

    D-branes on general N=1 backgrounds: Superpotentials and D-terms,

    L. Martucci, “D-branes on general N=1 backgrounds: Superpotentials and D-terms,” JHEP 06 (2006) 033, arXiv:hep-th/0602129

    2006 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Magnetized E3-brane instantons in F-theory,

    M. Bianchi, A. Collinucci, and L. Martucci, “Magnetized E3-brane instantons in F-theory,” JHEP 12 (2011) 045, arXiv:1107.3732 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Freezing E3-brane instantons with fluxes,

    M. Bianchi, A. Collinucci, and L. Martucci, “Freezing E3-brane instantons with fluxes,” Fortsch. Phys. 60 (2012) 914–920, arXiv:1202.5045 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Brane instantons and fluxes in F-theory,

    M. Bianchi, G. Inverso, and L. Martucci, “Brane instantons and fluxes in F-theory,” JHEP 07 (2013) 037, arXiv:1212.0024 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Building an explicit de Sitter,

    J. Louis, M. Rummel, R. Valandro, and A. Westphal, “Building an explicit de Sitter,” JHEP 10 (2012) 163, arXiv:1208.3208 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  40. [48]

    R**4 couplings in M and type II theories on Calabi-Yau spaces,

    I. Antoniadis, S. Ferrara, R. Minasian, and K. S. Narain, “R**4 couplings in M and type II theories on Calabi-Yau spaces,” Nucl. Phys. B507 (1997) 571–588, arXiv:hep-th/9707013

    1997 arXiv

  41. [49]

    UV Shadows in EFTs: Accidental Symmetries, Robustness and No-Scale Supergravity,

    C. P. Burgess, M. Cicoli, D. Ciupke, S. Krippendorf, and F. Quevedo, “UV Shadows in EFTs: Accidental Symmetries, Robustness and No-Scale Supergravity,” Fortsch. Phys.68 no. 10, (2020) 2000076, arXiv:2006.06694 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Systematics of the α’ expansion in F-theory,

    M. Cicoli, F. Quevedo, R. Savelli, A. Schachner, and R. Valandro, “Systematics of the α’ expansion in F-theory,” JHEP 08 (2021) 099, arXiv:2106.04592 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  43. [51]

    RG-induced modulus stabilization: perturbative de Sitter vacua and improved D3-D3 inflation,

    C. P. Burgess and F. Quevedo, “RG-induced modulus stabilization: perturbative de Sitter vacua and improved D3-D3 inflation,” JHEP 06 (2022) 167, arXiv:2202.05344 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Back to the origins of brane–antibrane inflation,

    M. Cicoli, C. Hughes, A. R. Kamal, F. Marino, F. Quevedo, M. Ramos-Hamud, and G. Villa, “Back to the origins of brane–antibrane inflation,” Eur. Phys. J. C85 no. 3, (2025) 315, arXiv:2410.00097 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Systematics of type IIB moduli stabilisation with odd axions,

    M. Cicoli, A. Schachner, and P. Shukla, “Systematics of type IIB moduli stabilisation with odd axions,” JHEP 04 (2022) 003, arXiv:2109.14624 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Building a better racetrack,

    F. Denef, M. R. Douglas, and B. Florea, “Building a better racetrack,” JHEP 06 (2004) 034, arXiv:hep-th/0404257

    2004 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Fixing all moduli in a simple f-theory compactification,

    F. Denef, M. R. Douglas, B. Florea, A. Grassi, and S. Kachru, “Fixing all moduli in a simple f-theory compactification,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.9 no. 6, (2005) 861–929, arXiv:hep-th/0503124

    2005 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Moduli Stabilization in Type IIB Orientifolds (II),

    D. Lust, S. Reffert, E. Scheidegger, W. Schulgin, and S. Stieberger, “Moduli Stabilization in Type IIB Orientifolds (II),” Nucl. Phys. B766 (2007) 178–231, arXiv:hep-th/0609013

    2007 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Vacua with Small Flux Superpotential,

    M. Demirtas, M. Kim, L. Mcallister, and J. Moritz, “Vacua with Small Flux Superpotential,” Phys. Rev. Lett.124 no. 21, (2020) 211603, arXiv:1912.10047 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Loop Blow-up Inflation,

    S. Bansal, L. Brunelli, M. Cicoli, A. Hebecker, and R. Kuespert, “Loop Blow-up Inflation,” arXiv:2403.04831 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  51. [59]

    Eternal inflation with alpha-prime-corrections,

    A. Westphal, “Eternal inflation with alpha-prime-corrections,” JCAP 11 (2005) 003, arXiv:hep-th/0507079

    2005 arXiv

  52. [60]

    A sufficient condition for de Sitter vacua in type IIB string theory,

    M. Rummel and A. Westphal, “A sufficient condition for de Sitter vacua in type IIB string theory,” JHEP 01 (2012) 020, arXiv:1107.2115 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Fibre Inflation: Observable Gravity Waves from IIB String Compactifications,

    M. Cicoli, C. P. Burgess, and F. Quevedo, “Fibre Inflation: Observable Gravity Waves from IIB String Compactifications,” JCAP 03 (2009) 013, arXiv:0808.0691 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Perturbative moduli stabilisation in type IIB/F-theory framework,

    I. Antoniadis, Y. Chen, and G. K. Leontaris, “Perturbative moduli stabilisation in type IIB/F-theory framework,” Eur. Phys. J. C78 no. 9, (2018) 766, arXiv:1803.08941 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Stabilising all K¨ ahler moduli in perturbative L VS,

    G. K. Leontaris and P. Shukla, “Stabilising all K¨ ahler moduli in perturbative L VS,”JHEP 07 (2022) 047, arXiv:2203.03362 [hep-th]. – 28 –

    2022 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Axion minima in string theory,

    N. Gendler, O. Janssen, M. Kleban, J. La Madrid, and V. M. Mehta, “Axion minima in string theory,” JHEP 02 (2025) 134, arXiv:2309.01831 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Stability in Gauged Extended Supergravity,

    P. Breitenlohner and D. Z. Freedman, “Stability in Gauged Extended Supergravity,” Annals Phys. 144 (1982) 249

    1982

  58. [66]

    Counting Calabi-Yau Threefolds,

    N. Gendler, N. MacFadden, L. McAllister, J. Moritz, R. Nally, A. Schachner, and M. Stillman, “Counting Calabi-Yau Threefolds,” arXiv:2310.06820 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  59. [67]

    Enumerating Calabi-Yau Manifolds: Placing Bounds on the Number of Diffeomorphism Classes in the Kreuzer-Skarke List,

    A. Chandra, A. Constantin, C. S. Fraser-Taliente, T. R. Harvey, and A. Lukas, “Enumerating Calabi-Yau Manifolds: Placing Bounds on the Number of Diffeomorphism Classes in the Kreuzer-Skarke List,” Fortsch. Phys.72 no. 5, (2024) 2300264, arXiv:2310.05909 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  60. [68]

    The L VS parametric tadpole constraint,

    X. Gao, A. Hebecker, S. Schreyer, and G. Venken, “The L VS parametric tadpole constraint,” JHEP 07 (2022) 056, arXiv:2202.04087 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Gaugino condensation and small uplifts in KKLT,

    F. Carta, J. Moritz, and A. Westphal, “Gaugino condensation and small uplifts in KKLT,” JHEP 08 (2019) 141, arXiv:1902.01412 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Control issues of KKLT,

    X. Gao, A. Hebecker, and D. Junghans, “Control issues of KKLT,” Fortsch. Phys.68 (2020) 2000089, arXiv:2009.03914 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Resolving spacetime singularities in flux compactifications & KKLT,

    F. Carta and J. Moritz, “Resolving spacetime singularities in flux compactifications & KKLT,” JHEP 08 (2021) 093, arXiv:2101.05281 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  64. [72]

    G2-manifolds from Diophantine equations,

    J. Moritz, “ G2-manifolds from Diophantine equations,” arXiv:2505.15883 [hep-th]

  65. [73]

    Supergravity and a confining gauge theory: Duality cascades and chi SB resolution of naked singularities,

    I. R. Klebanov and M. J. Strassler, “Supergravity and a confining gauge theory: Duality cascades and chi SB resolution of naked singularities,” JHEP 08 (2000) 052, arXiv:hep-th/0007191

    2000 arXiv

  66. [74]

    On de Sitter String Vacua from Anti-D3-Branes in the Large Volume Scenario,

    C. Crin` o, F. Quevedo, and R. Valandro, “On de Sitter String Vacua from Anti-D3-Branes in the Large Volume Scenario,” JHEP 03 (2021) 258, arXiv:2010.15903 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Stability, Tunneling and Flux Changing de Sitter Transitions in the Large Volume String Scenario,

    S. de Alwis, R. Gupta, E. Hatefi, and F. Quevedo, “Stability, Tunneling and Flux Changing de Sitter Transitions in the Large Volume String Scenario,” JHEP 11 (2013) 179, arXiv:1308.1222 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Observational consequences of a landscape,

    B. Freivogel, M. Kleban, M. Rodriguez Martinez, and L. Susskind, “Observational consequences of a landscape,” JHEP 03 (2006) 039, arXiv:hep-th/0505232

    2006 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Universal Properties of Type IIB and F-theory Flux Compactifications at Large Complex Structure,

    M. C. D. Marsh and K. Sousa, “Universal Properties of Type IIB and F-theory Flux Compactifications at Large Complex Structure,” JHEP 03 (2016) 064, arXiv:1512.08549 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  70. [78]

    An Obstacle to populating the string theory landscape,

    M. C. Johnson and M. Larfors, “An Obstacle to populating the string theory landscape,” Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 123513, arXiv:0809.2604 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Runaway dilatonic domain walls,

    A. Aguirre, M. C. Johnson, and M. Larfors, “Runaway dilatonic domain walls,” Phys. Rev. D81 (2010) 043527, arXiv:0911.4342 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Populating the Whole Landscape,

    A. R. Brown and A. Dahlen, “Populating the Whole Landscape,” Phys. Rev. Lett.107 (2011) 171301, arXiv:1108.0119 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Gravitational Effects on and of Vacuum Decay,

    S. R. Coleman and F. De Luccia, “Gravitational Effects on and of Vacuum Decay,” Phys. Rev. D21 (1980) 3305

    1980

  74. [82]

    Neutralization of the Cosmological Constant by Membrane Creation,

    J. D. Brown and C. Teitelboim, “Neutralization of the Cosmological Constant by Membrane Creation,” Nucl. Phys. B297 (1988) 787–836

    1988

  75. [83]

    On ’nothing’ as an infinitely negatively curved spacetime,

    A. R. Brown and A. Dahlen, “On ’nothing’ as an infinitely negatively curved spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 104026, arXiv:1111.0301 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Quantum transitions, detailed balance, black holes, and nothingness,

    S. Cespedes, S. de Alwis, F. Muia, and F. Quevedo, “Quantum transitions, detailed balance, black holes, and nothingness,” Phys. Rev. D109 no. 10, (2024) 105027, arXiv:2307.13614 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Putting the Boot into the Swampland,

    J. P. Conlon and F. Quevedo, “Putting the Boot into the Swampland,” JHEP 03 (2019) 005, arXiv:1811.06276 [hep-th]. – 29 –

    2019 arXiv

  78. [86]

    On KKLT/CFT and L VS/CFT Dualities,

    S. de Alwis, R. K. Gupta, F. Quevedo, and R. Valandro, “On KKLT/CFT and L VS/CFT Dualities,” JHEP 07 (2015) 036, arXiv:1412.6999 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Volume Modulus Inflation and the Gravitino Mass Problem,

    J. P. Conlon, R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde, and F. Quevedo, “Volume Modulus Inflation and the Gravitino Mass Problem,” JCAP 09 (2008) 011, arXiv:0806.0809 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Catch-me-if-you-can: the overshoot problem and the weak/inflation hierarchy,

    J. P. Conlon and F. Revello, “Catch-me-if-you-can: the overshoot problem and the weak/inflation hierarchy,” JHEP 11 (2022) 155, arXiv:2207.00567 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Kination, meet Kasner: on the asymptotic cosmology of string compactifications,

    F. Apers, J. P. Conlon, M. Mosny, and F. Revello, “Kination, meet Kasner: on the asymptotic cosmology of string compactifications,” JHEP 08 (2023) 156, arXiv:2212.10293 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Percolating Cosmic String Networks from Kination,

    J. P. Conlon, E. J. Copeland, E. Hardy, and N. S. Gonz´ alez, “Percolating Cosmic String Networks from Kination,” arXiv:2406.12637 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  83. [91]

    Cosmic (super)strings with a time-varying tension,

    F. Revello and G. Villa, “Cosmic (super)strings with a time-varying tension,” JCAP 04 (2025) 049, arXiv:2411.04186 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Cosmic superstrings in large volume compactifications: PTAs, LISA and time-varying tension,

    A. Ghoshal, F. Revello, and G. Villa, “Cosmic superstrings in large volume compactifications: PTAs, LISA and time-varying tension,” arXiv:2504.20994 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  85. [93]

    Inflationary Cosmology from Anti-de Sitter Wormholes,

    P. Betzios and O. Papadoulaki, “Inflationary Cosmology from Anti-de Sitter Wormholes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 no. 2, (2024) 021501, arXiv:2403.17046 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Magnetic Anti-de Sitter Wormholes as seeds for Higgs Inflation,

    P. Betzios, I. D. Gialamas, and O. Papadoulaki, “Magnetic Anti-de Sitter Wormholes as seeds for Higgs Inflation,” arXiv:2412.03639 [hep-th]. – 30 –

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.