Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 59 references

The interplay of ferroelectricity and magneto-transport in non-magnetic moir\'{e} superlattices

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a perpendicular magnetic field increases the switchable electric polarization of non-magnetic graphene/hBN moir\'e superlattices through a purely electronic mechanism, and that this polarization can suppress…

desk verdict Striking B-enhanced ferroelectricity claim in non-magnetic moiré stacks, but the evidence is not yet independent of the transport artifact it is meant to explain. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.00745 v1 pith:QW27SXIP submitted 2025-07-01 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

Siqi Jiang , Renjun Du , Jiawei Jiang , Gan Liu , Jiabei Huang , Yu Du , Yaqing Han , Jingkuan Xiao
show 15 more authors
Di Zhang Fuzhuo Lian Wanting Xu Siqin Wang Lei Qiao Kenji Watanabe Takashi Taniguchi Xiaoxiang Xi Wei Ren Baigeng Wang Alexander S. Mayorov Kai Chang Hongxin Yang Lei Wang Geliang Yu
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hall
keywords moiréferroelectricitygraphene/hBNslidingmagnetoelectriceffectShubnikov-deHaasoscillationsquantumHalltwo-dimensionalferroelectricvanderWaalsheterostructures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that a perpendicular magnetic field strengthens the switchable electric polarization of graphene/hBN moir\'e superlattices, even though these devices contain no magnetic elements, and that the strengthened polarization can in turn switch off Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations and reshape quantum Hall plateaus. The authors show the effect in several layer configurations, including an across-layer stack where a rotated monolayer graphene is intercalated between the trilayer graphene and hBN, and they report that it persists up to room temperature. The claimed mechanism is purely electronic: density functional theory calculations with fixed ionic positions reproduce a field-dependent polarization, ruling out lattice or magnetostrictive contributions. If correct, this gives a non-magnetic platform for magnetoelectric coupling and a ferroelectric knob for quantum transport.

What carries the argument

The carrier is sliding ferroelectricity in the moir\'e superlattice: a network of non-centrosymmetric ABCA and ABAC stacking domains in TLG/hBN carries opposite out-of-plane polarization, and an electric field switches between them by interlayer sliding. The observable is the hysteresis of the charge-neutrality point, converted into a two-dimensional polarization $P_{2D}=e\Delta n_H d$. For the magnetic enhancement, the load-bearing calculation is a first-principles Berry-phase evaluation of electronic polarization with ionic positions frozen at finite magnetic field, which isolates the electronic contribution and shows a much larger $B$-response in the ABAC domain.

What would settle it

A graphene/hBN device with no moir\'e superlattice, measured under the same forward/backward gate sweeps in a perpendicular field, would reveal whether the field-dependent neutrality-point shift is intrinsic to the moir\'e domains; a direct electrostatic-force-microscopy measurement of $P_{2D}$ at fixed field would settle whether the extracted polarization is real.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a perpendicular magnetic field enhances the remnant ferroelectric polarization of graphene/hBN moir\'e superlattices through an electronic, not ionic, response, and that the resulting polarized phase modifies the magneto-transport of the device. In the experiments the charge-neutrality-point shift between forward and backward gate sweeps, converted to $P_{2D}=e\Delta n_H d$, grows from $-0.05$ to $0.08$ pC/m at fixed displacement field as $B$ rises to 13.5 T, and field-enhanced hysteresis persists up to 275 K. The polarization is found to suppress the Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations of the trilayer graphene and to change the Hall conductance filling factors, with local and nonlocal measurements suggesting unidirectional current propagation along one edge. The authors attribute the effect to the combined breaking of spatial-inversion symmetry by the ferroelectric domains and of time-reversal symmetry by the field, with first-principles calculations showing a linear $B$-dependence of electronic polarization that is an order of magnitude stronger in one stacking domain than the other.

Load-bearing premise

The whole claim rests on interpreting the gate-sweep hysteresis of the charge-neutrality point as a true electric polarization of stacking domains, rather than a magnetic-field-dependent charge-trapping or magnetoresistance artifact.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any graphene/hBN moir\'e stack with non-centrosymmetric domains should show $B$-enhanced polarization, independent of layer count or intercalation.
  • The polarized phase acts as a voltage-tunable switch for Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations: oscillations are suppressed in the polarized phase and restored in the non-polarized phase.
  • Quantum Hall plateaus in the polarized phase can shift from integer to random fractional filling factors, offering a ferroelectric control of quantum Hall states.
  • The enhancement is not a low-temperature curiosity: it persists up to 275 K, so room-temperature operation is in reach.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the effect is claimed to be purely electronic, the field-enhancement rate $dP_{2D}/dB$ should track the moir\'e band structure; a device series varying the twist angle or interlayer distance could test that scaling.
  • The edge-asymmetric and $B$-asymmetric SdH suppression resembles chiral edge transport; reversing the current direction in the nonlocal geometry would test whether the unidirectionality follows the current or the field.
  • No control device without a moir\'e superlattice is reported, so a key test is to measure an aligned but non-superlattice stack and check that its neutrality-point hysteresis stays $B$-independent.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports magneto-transport experiments on graphene/hBN moiré devices, including an ABA-trilayer-graphene/hBN moiré superlattice and an MLG-intercalated “across-layer” version. At zero magnetic field, the authors observe sweep-direction-dependent resistance hysteresis, which they attribute to interfacial ferroelectricity. They then claim that a perpendicular magnetic field enhances the ferroelectric polarization up to room temperature, that this enhancement is purely electronic, and that the polarized state suppresses Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations and modifies quantum Hall conductance. The central observable throughout is the sweep-direction-dependent shift of the charge neutrality point, converted to a polarization through P2D = eΔnH d.

Significance. If correct, the result would be a striking example of magnetoelectric coupling in non-magnetic moiré materials and would establish ferroelectric polarization as a switch for quantum transport. The manuscript has genuine strengths: the zero-field hysteresis is observed in several devices with different layer configurations, the temperature dependence in Fig. 3b extends to 275 K, and the authors attempt to separate ionic and electronic contributions with DFT. However, the key quantity P2D is not measured directly, and the paper does not exclude an artifact of the same transport hysteresis used to define the polarization. The significance is therefore conditional on new control experiments.

major comments (4)
  1. [Magnetic field-enhanced ferroelectricity / Methods: Determination of gate capacitance] The central quantity P2D is obtained from the difference in charge-neutrality-point (CNP) positions between forward and backward sweeps under magnetic field via P2D = eΔnH d, assuming a rigid parallel-plate capacitor with d = 0.34 nm. At B = 13.5 T, the Rxx maps in Fig. 2a,b that are used to locate the CNPs are themselves dominated by Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations and quantum Hall features, so the extracted shift may reflect magnetoresistance or field-dependent charge trapping rather than a change in electric polarization. No control device without a moiré superlattice is presented; all devices share the moiré pattern, and multi-device reproducibility therefore does not rule out a common artifact. Reference 24 (Waters et al.) documents exactly such anomalous hysteresis in graphite/hBN transistors without a moiré lattice and is cited but not addressed. The authors should provide a non-moiré control, a direct polarization probe, or quantitative estimates of the proposed artifact; without this, the B-enhancement claim is not established.
  2. [Effects of ferroelectric polarization on magneto-transport] The polarized (P) and nonpolarized (N) phases in Fig. 4a-d are identified from the same Rxx(Vb/db, Vt/dt) maps in which SdH suppression is later claimed. The phase label and the effect are therefore not independent: the quantity used to define the polarization is read off the same resistance features it is said to explain. The authors themselves state in the Results that “the precise link between magneto-transport and ferroelectric polarization remains unclear and demands further theoretical and microscopic investigation.” An independent determination of the polarization state (for example, from a simultaneous capacitance, optical, or scanning-probe measurement) is needed before concluding that polarization gates quantum oscillations.
  3. [Methods: Computational methods] The DFT description says that “The magnetic field was applied self-consistently by including SOC in the calculations.” This is not a transparent representation of an external magnetic field: spin-orbit coupling produces spin splitting but not the orbital effects of a perpendicular magnetic field. Please specify whether a Zeeman term, an orbital Peierls phase, or a spin-dependent potential was used, and justify why this captures the experimental field range. The theoretical claim of a purely electronic B-enhanced polarization (Supplementary Fig. S29) depends on this point.
  4. [Methods: Determination of gate capacitance] The Methods state that the device is “assumed to be a series of parallel-plate capacitors” and that the graphene multilayers are “treated as a single charge layer.” In the intercalated devices, however, the MLG is described as decoupled from the TLG (Supplementary Fig. S10e), so a single-layer capacitance model may misassign gate-voltage changes between two independent carrier systems. This affects the quantitative P2D values in the across-layer devices and should be justified or replaced by a two-carrier analysis.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 4] The abbreviations “P phase” and “N phase” are used in the text and figure before being explicitly defined; please define them (polarized and nonpolarized) in the main text or caption at first use.
  2. [Fig. 3b] The inset showing dP2D/dB as a function of temperature would benefit from a clear statement of the fitting range and from error bars on the slopes, given that the P2D(B) curves are presented without uncertainties.
  3. [Figure captions] Several figure captions contain garbled unicode placeholders (e.g., strings starting with “/uni000000…”) that should be cleaned before publication.
  4. [Results / Conclusion] The sentence in the Results that “the precise link between magneto-transport and ferroelectric polarization remains unclear” is an important caveat; please expand it in the Conclusions to specify which missing measurement or theory would establish the proposed link.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the B-enhanced polarization is the directly measured CNP hysteresis (P2D = eΔn_H d), not a fitted prediction; the SdH-suppression claim is a correlated transport signature whose mechanism the paper explicitly leaves open.

full rationale

The paper's central new claim, magnetic-field-enhanced ferroelectric polarization, is not derived from an input that already contains the result; it is the directly reported observable. Polarization is quantified throughout by the standard relation P2D = eΔn_H d (Figs. 1b, 2c-d and Methods), where Δn_H is the sweep-direction difference in the charge-neutrality point extracted from Rxx maps. This is the same operational definition used in the prior moiré-ferroelectric literature the paper calibrates against (refs 6, 8, 10, 24, 25), and the B-dependence is read off the measured CNP line rather than being fitted from a separate quantity and then renamed a prediction. The DFT section provides an independent, parameter-constrained check that the electronic Berry-phase polarization grows with B while ionic contributions remain negligible, so the electronic-origin claim does not rest on a self-citation chain. The later claim that polarization suppresses SdH oscillations and alters quantum Hall states is an empirical correlation between two transport features: the CNP hysteresis that defines the P/N phases and the oscillation amplitude observed in those phases. No equation in the paper reduces the predicted SdH suppression to the fitted density or to the definition of polarization, and the authors explicitly state the limitation: 'the precise link between magneto-transport and ferroelectric polarization remains unclear and demands further theoretical and microscopic investigation.' The alternative of a magnetoresistance or charge-trapping artifact raised by ref. 24 is a validity concern about the polarization extraction, not a circularity, and the absence of a no-moiré control does not make the derivation circular. Self-citations present in the paper (refs 30, 34, 50) support standard miniband, spin-texture, and transfer-stack claims and are not load-bearing for the central result. Therefore no identifiable circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central experimental claim rests on a capacitance calibration instead of a direct polarization measurement, and the purely-electronic interpretation rests on a DFT magnetic-field treatment that is not fully exposed. No new particles, fields, or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Gate capacitances Ct and Cb = device-dependent, not quoted; derived from Hall density at 0.1 T and Landau fan fitting
    All n, D, and P2D values in Figs. 1-4 are computed from gate voltages using these capacitances under a parallel-plate single-charge-layer model; the extracted polarization magnitudes and their B-dependence are sensitive to this calibration.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Moiré sliding ferroelectricity: polarization arises from switching between stacking domains (e.g., ABCA/ABAC, ABBCA/ABBAC) driven by interlayer sliding.
    Invoked in Results to interpret hysteresis; supported by refs 35-42 but not directly probed in these devices, and ref 24 offers a competing charge-trapping explanation for similar hysteresis.
  • domain assumption Parallel-plate capacitor model with the graphene multilayers as one charge layer.
    Used in Methods to convert Vb, Vt into n and D; assumes no spatial charge redistribution within the multilayer stack and constant capacitances at all fields.
  • domain assumption External magnetic field breaks time-reversal symmetry while non-centrosymmetric stacking domains break inversion, enabling a linear electronic magnetoelectric response.
    Stated in Results as the mechanism for B-enhanced polarization; standard symmetry argument, but the microscopic orbital/spin origin is not derived in the paper.
  • ad hoc to paper DFT with a self-consistent magnetic field represented through spin-orbit coupling captures the electronic polarization response.
    Methods: 'The magnetic field was applied self-consistently by including SOC in the calculations'; this treatment is not fully specified and is the main computational support for excluding ionic contributions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The interplay of ferroelectricity and magneto-transport in non-magnetic moir\'{e} superlattices." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QW27SXIP

@misc{pith2026250700745,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The interplay of ferroelectricity and magneto-transport in non-magnetic moir\'e superlattices},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QW27SXIP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.00745}
}
read the original abstract

The coupling of ferroelectricity and magnetic order provides rich tunability for engineering material properties and demonstrates great potential for uncovering novel quantum phenomena and multifunctional devices. Here, we report interfacial ferroelectricity in moir\'{e} superlattices constructed from graphene and hexagonal boron nitride. We observe ferroelectric polarization in an across-layer moir\'{e} superlattice with an intercalated layer, demonstrating a remnant polarization comparable to its non-intercalated counterpart. Remarkably, we reveal a magnetic-field enhancement of ferroelectric polarization that persists up to room temperature, showcasing an unconventional amplification of ferroelectricity in materials lacking magnetic elements. This phenomenon, consistent across devices with varying layer configurations, arises purely from electronic rather than ionic contributions. Furthermore, the ferroelectric polarization in turn modulates quantum transport characteristics, suppressing Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations and altering quantum Hall states in polarized phases. This interplay between ferroelectricity and magneto-transport in non-magnetic materials is crucial for exploring magnetoelectric effects and advancing two-dimensional memory and logic applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.00745 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    C. Wang, L. You, D. Cobden, and J. Wang, Towards two- dimensional van der Waals ferroelectrics, Nat. Mater.22, 542 (2023)

    2023

  2. [2]

    Coletti, J

    A.Dey, N.Cottam, O.Makarovskiy, W.Yan, V.Mišeikis, C. Coletti, J. Kerfoot, V. Korolkov, L. Eaves, J. F. Lin- nartz, A. Kool, S. Wiedmann, and A. Patanè, Ther- mally stable quantum Hall effect in a gated ferroelectric- graphene heterostructure, Commun. Phys.6, 216 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    B. Xu, P. D. Lomenzo, A. Kersch, T. Schenk, C. Richter, C. M. Fancher, S. Starschich, F. Berg, P. Reinig, K. M. Holsgrove, T. Kiguchi, T. Mikolajick, U. Boettger, and U. Schroeder, Strain as a global factor in stabilizing the ferroelectric properties of ZrO2, Adv. Funct. Mater.34, 2311825 (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Zhang, Q

    S. Zhang, Q. Xu, Y. Hou, A. Song, Y. Ma, L. Gao, M. Zhu, T. Ma, L. Liu, X.-Q. Feng, and Q. Li, Domino- like stacking order switching in twisted monolayer– multilayer graphene, Nat. Mater.21, 621 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    S. S. Atri, W. Cao, B. Alon, N. Roy, M. V. Stern, V. Falko, M. Goldstein, L. Kronik, M. Urbakh, O. Hod, and M. Ben Shalom, Spontaneous electric polarization in graphene polytypes, Adv. Phys. Res.3, 2300095 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Zheng, Q

    Z. Zheng, Q. Ma, Z. Bi, S. De La Barrera, M.-H. Liu, N. Mao, Y. Zhang, N. Kiper, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Kong, W. A. Tisdale, R. Ashoori, N. Gedik, L. Fu, S.- Y. Xu, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional ferroelec- tricity in moiré heterostructures, Nature588, 71 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    K. S. Novoselov, A. Mishchenko, A. Carvalho, and A. H. Castro Neto, 2D materials and van der Waals het- erostructures, Science353, aac9439 (2016)

    2016

  8. [8]

    Zhang, J

    L. Zhang, J. Ding, H. Xiang, N. Liu, W. Zhou, L. Wu, N. Xin, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and S. Xu, Elec- tronic ferroelectricity in monolayer graphene moiré su- perlattices, Nat. Commun.15, 10905 (2024)

    work page 2024

Show all 59 references
  1. [10]

    R. Niu, Z. Li, X. Han, Z. Qu, D. Ding, Z. Wang, Q. Liu, T. Liu, C. Han, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Wu, Q. Ren, X. Wang, J. Hong, J. Mao, Z. Han, K. Liu, Z. Gan, and J. Lu, Giant ferroelectric polarization in a bilayer graphene heterostructure, Nat. Commun.13, 6241 (2022)

    2022

  2. [11]

    X. Yan, Z. Zheng, V. K. Sangwan, J. H. Qian, X. Wang, S. E. Liu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S.-Y. Xu, P. Jarillo-Herrero, Q. Ma, and M. C. Hersam, Moiré synaptic transistor with room-temperature neuromor- phic functionality, Nature624, 551 (2023)

    2023

  3. [12]

    D. R. Klein, L.-Q. Xia, D. MacNeill, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Electrical switching of a bistable moiré superconductor, Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 331 (2023)

    2023

  4. [13]

    M. Chen, Y. Xie, B. Cheng, Z. Yang, X.-Z. Li, F. Chen, Q. Li, J. Xie, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, W.-Y. He, M. Wu, S.-J. Liang, and F. Miao, Selective and quasi- continuous switching of ferroelectric Chern insulator de- vicesforneuromorphiccomputing,Nat.Nanotechnol.19, 962 (2024)

    2024

  5. [14]

    Kimura, T

    T. Kimura, T. Goto, H. Shintani, K. Ishizaka, T. Arima, and Y. Tokura, Magnetic control of ferroelectric polar- ization, Nature426, 55 (2003)

    2003

  6. [15]

    Cheong and M

    S.-W. Cheong and M. Mostovoy, Multiferroics: a mag- netic twist for ferroelectricity, Nat. Mater.6, 13 (2007)

    2007

  7. [16]

    Stroppa, D

    A. Stroppa, D. Di Sante, P. Barone, M. Bokdam, G. Kresse, C. Franchini, M.-H. Whangbo, and S. Picozzi, Tunable ferroelectric polarization and its interplay with spin–orbit coupling in tin iodide perovskites, Nat. Com- mun.5, 5900 (2014)

    2014

  8. [17]

    Hao, W.-H

    D. Hao, W.-H. Chang, Y.-C. Chang, W.-T. Liu, S.-Z. Ho, C.-H. Lu, T. H. Yang, N. Kawakami, Y.-C. Chen, M.-H. Liu, C.-L.Lin, T.-H.Lu, Y.-W.Lan,andN.-C.Yeh,Mag- 7 netic field-induced polar order in monolayer molybdenum disulfide transistors, Adv. Mater.36, 2411393 (2024)

    2024

  9. [18]

    Yahia, F

    G. Yahia, F. Damay, S. Chattopadhyay, V. Balédent, W. Peng, E. Elkaim, M. Whitaker, M. Greenblatt, M.-B. Lepetit, and P. Foury-Leylekian, Recognition of exchange striction as the origin of magnetoelectric coupling in mul- tiferroics, Phys. Rev. B95, 184112 (2017)

    2017

  10. [19]

    N. Lee, Y. J. Choi, M. Ramazanoglu, W. Ratcliff, V.Kiryukhin,andS.-W.Cheong,Mechanismofexchange striction of ferroelectricity in multiferroic orthorhombic HoMnO3 single crystals, Phys. Rev. B84, 020101 (2011)

    2011

  11. [20]

    Sannigrahi, S

    J. Sannigrahi, S. Bhowal, S. Giri, S. Majumdar, and I. Dasgupta, Exchange-striction induced giant ferroelec- tric polarization in copper-based multiferroic material α−Cu 2V2O7, Phys. Rev. B91, 220407 (2015)

    2015

  12. [21]

    Datta, S

    B. Datta, S. Dey, A. Samanta, H. Agarwal, A. Borah, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. Sensarma, and M. M. Deshmukh, Strong electronic interaction and multiple quantum Hall ferromagnetic phases in trilayer graphene, Nat. Commun.8, 14518 (2017)

    2017

  13. [22]

    C. Pan, Y. Wu, B. Cheng, S. Che, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, C. N. Lau, and M. Bockrath, Layer po- larizability and easy-axis quantum Hall ferromagnetism in bilayer graphene, Nano Lett.17, 3416 (2017)

    2017

  14. [23]

    P. J. Sarsfield, A. Garcia-Ruiz, and V. I. Fal’ko, Sub- strate, temperature, and magnetic field dependence of electric polarization in mixed-stacking tetralayer graphenes, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 043324 (2024)

    2024

  15. [24]

    Waters, D

    D. Waters, D. Waleffe, E. Thompson, E. Arreguin- Martinez, J. Fonseca, T. Poirier, J. H. Edgar, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, X. Xu, D. Cobden, and M. Yankowitz, On the origin of anomalous hysteresis in graphite/boron nitride transistors., , Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2410...

    2024 arXiv

  16. [25]

    R. Niu, Z. Li, X. Han, Z. Qu, Q. Liu, Z. Wang, C. Han, C.Wang, Y.Wu, C.Yang, M.Lv, K.Yang, K.Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. Liu, J. Mao, W. Shi, R. Che, W. Zhou, J. Xue, M. Wu, B. Peng, Z. V. Han, Z. Gan, and J. Lu, Ferroelectricity with concomitant Coulomb screening in van der Wa...

    2025

  17. [26]

    F. Lin, X. Xuan, Z. Cao, Z. Zhang, Y. Liu, M. Xue, Y. Hang, X. Liu, Y. Zhao, L. Gao, W. Guo, and Y. Liu, Room temperature ferroelectricity in monolayer graphene sandwiched between hexagonal boron nitride, Nat. Commun.16, 1189 (2025)

    2025

  18. [27]

    X. Chen, X. Xuan, W. Guo, and Z. Zhang, Ferroelectric- ity in van der Waals multilayers via interfacial polariza- tion engineering, npj 2D Mater. Appl.9, 10 (2025)

    2025

  19. [28]

    Yang and M

    Z. Yang and M. Wu, Superlubric sliding ferroelectricity., , Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.16118 (2025), arXiv:2501.16118 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    2025 arXiv

  20. [29]

    C. R. Dean, L. Wang, P. Maher, C. Forsythe, F. Ghahari, Y. Gao, J. Katoch, M. Ishigami, P. Moon, M. Koshino, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, K. L. Shepard, J. Hone, and P. Kim, Hofstadter’s butterfly and the fractal quantum Halleffectinmoirésuperlattices,Nature497,598(2013)

    2013

  21. [30]

    L. A. Ponomarenko, R. V. Gorbachev, G. L. Yu, D. C. Elias, R. Jalil, A. A. Patel, A. Mishchenko, A. S. Mayorov, C. R. Woods, J. R. Wallbank, M. Mucha- Kruczynski, B. A. Piot, M. Potemski, I. V. Grigorieva, K. S. Novoselov, F. Guinea, V. I. Fal’ko, and A. K. Geim, Cloning of Di...

    2013

  22. [31]

    Rickhaus, M.-H

    P. Rickhaus, M.-H. Liu, M. Kurpas, A. Kurzmann, Y. Lee, H. Overweg, M. Eich, R. Pisoni, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, K. Richter, K. Ensslin, and T. Ihn, The electronic thickness of graphene, Sci. Adv.6, eaay8409 (2020)

    2020

  23. [32]

    Mreńca-Kolasińska, P

    A. Mreńca-Kolasińska, P. Rickhaus, G. Zheng, K. Richter, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin, and M.-H. Liu, Quantum capacitive coupling between large-angle twisted graphene layers, 2D Mater.9, 025013 (2022)

    2022

  24. [33]

    Zollner, M

    K. Zollner, M. Gmitra, and J. Fabian, Proximity spin- orbit and exchange coupling in ABA and ABC trilayer graphene van der Waals heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 105, 115126 (2022)

    2022

  25. [34]

    H. Yang, B. Martín-García, J. Kimák, E. Schmoranze- rová, E. Dolan, Z. Chi, M. Gobbi, P. Němec, L. E. Hueso, and F. Casanova, Twist-angle-tunable spin tex- ture in WSe2/graphene van der Waals heterostructures, Nat. Mater.23, 1502 (2024)

    2024

  26. [35]

    Li and M

    L. Li and M. Wu, Binary compound bilayer and multi- layer with vertical polarizations: Two-dimensional ferro- electrics, multiferroics, and nanogenerators, ACS Nano 11, 6382 (2017)

    2017

  27. [36]

    Yang and M

    L. Yang and M. Wu, Across-layer sliding ferroelectric- ity in 2D heterolayers, Adv. Funct. Mater.33, 2301105 (2023)

    2023

  28. [37]

    Garcia-Ruiz, V

    A. Garcia-Ruiz, V. Enaldiev, A. McEllistrim, and V. I. Fal’ko, Mixed-stacking few-layer graphene as an elemen- tal weak ferroelectric material, Nano Lett.23, 4120 (2023)

    2023

  29. [38]

    L. Yang, S. Ding, J. Gao, and M. Wu, Atypical sliding and moiré ferroelectricity in pure multilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 096801 (2023)

    2023

  30. [39]

    Vizner Stern, Y

    M. Vizner Stern, Y. Waschitz, W. Cao, I. Nevo, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Sela, M. Urbakh, O. Hod, andM.BenShalom,Interfacialferroelectricitybyvander Waals sliding, Science372, 1462 (2021)

    2021

  31. [40]

    K. Ko, A. Yuk, R. Engelke, S. Carr, J. Kim, D. Park, H. Heo, H.-M. Kim, S.-G. Kim, H. Kim, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, H. Park, E. Kaxiras, S. M. Yang, P. Kim, and H. Yoo, Operando electron microscopy investigation of polar domain dynamics in twisted van der Waals ho- mobilayer...

    2023

  32. [41]

    Molino, L

    L. Molino, L. Aggarwal, V. Enaldiev, R. Plumadore, V.I.Fal’ko,andA.Luican-Mayer,Ferroelectricswitching at symmetry-broken interfaces by local control of dislo- cations networks, Adv. Mater.35, 2207816 (2023)

    2023

  33. [42]

    Zhang, Y

    S. Zhang, Y. Liu, Z. Sun, X. Chen, B. Li, S. L. Moore, S.Liu, Z.Wang, S.E.Rossi, R.Jing, J.Fonseca, B.Yang, Y. Shao, C.-Y. Huang, T. Handa, L. Xiong, M. Fu, T.-C. Pan, D. Halbertal, X. Xu, W. Zheng, P. J. Schuck, A. N. Pasupathy, C. R. Dean, X. Zhu, D. H. Cobden, X. Xu, M. Liu...

    2023

  34. [43]

    Bousquet, N

    E. Bousquet, N. A. Spaldin, and K. T. Delaney, Unex- pectedly large electronic contribution to linear magneto- electricity, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 107202 (2011)

    2011

  35. [44]

    T. R. Dasa, L. Hao, J. Liu, and H. Xu, Designing iridate- basedsuperlatticewithlargemagnetoelectriccoupling,J. Mater. Chem. C7, 13294 (2019)

    2019

  36. [45]

    Y. Feng, G. Jiang, W. Wu, S. Li, K. He, X. Ma, Q.- K. Xue, and Y. Wang, Tunable chiral and helical edge 8 state transport in a magnetic topological insulator bi- layer, Phys. Rev. B100, 165403 (2019)

    2019

  37. [46]

    I. T. Rosen, E. J. Fox, X. Kou, L. Pan, K. L. Wang, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Chiral transport along magnetic domain walls in the quantum anomalous Hall effect, npj Quant. Mater.2, 69 (2017)

    2017

  38. [47]

    J. Zhu, Y. Feng, X. Zhou, Y. Wang, H. Yao, Z. Lian, W.Lin, Q.He, Y.Lin, Y.Wang, Y.Wang, S.Yang, H.Li, Y. Wu, C. Liu, J. Wang, J. Shen, J. Zhang, Y. Wang, and Y. Wang, Directobservation ofchiraledge current at zero magnetic field in a magnetic topological insulator, Nat. Commun...

    2025

  39. [48]

    Saito, J

    Y. Saito, J. Ge, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and A. F. Young, Independent superconductors and correlated in- sulators in twisted bilayer graphene, Nat. Phys.16, 926 (2020)

    2020

  40. [49]

    Y. You, Z. Ni, T. Yu, and Z. Shen, Edge chirality de- termination of graphene by Raman spectroscopy, Appl. Phys. Lett.93, 163112 (2008)

    2008

  41. [50]

    Watanabe, L.M.Campos, D.A.Muller, J

    L.Wang, I.Meric, P.Y.Huang, Q.Gao, Y.Gao, H.Tran, T.Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, L.M.Campos, D.A.Muller, J. Guo, P. Kim, J. Hone, K. L. Shepard, and C. R. Dean, One-dimensional electrical contact to a two-dimensional material, Science342, 614 (2013)

    2013

  42. [51]

    K. Kim, M. Yankowitz, B. Fallahazad, S. Kang, H. C. P. Movva, S. Huang, S. Larentis, C. M. Cor- bet, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. K. Banerjee, B. J. LeRoy, and E. Tutuc, van der Waals heterostructures with high accuracy rotational alignment, Nano Lett.16, 1989 (2016)

    2016

  43. [52]

    Y. Cao, J. Y. Luo, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, J. D. Sanchez- Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Superlattice-induced insulating states and valley-protected orbits in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 116804 (2016)

    2016

  44. [53]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Comput. Mater. Sci.6, 15 (1996)

    1996

  45. [54]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  46. [55]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  47. [56]

    Klimeš, D

    J. Klimeš, D. R. Bowler, and A. Michaelides, Van der Waals density functionals applied to solids, Phys. Rev. B83, 195131 (2011)

    2011

  48. [57]

    Neugebauer and M

    J. Neugebauer and M. Scheffler, Adsorbate-substrate and adsorbate-adsorbate interactions of Na and K adlayers on Al(111), Phys. Rev. B46, 16067 (1992)

    1992

  49. [58]

    Henkelman, B

    G. Henkelman, B. P. Uberuaga, and H. Jónsson, A climb- ing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths, J. Chem. Phys.113, 9901 (2000)

    2000

  50. [59]

    R. D. King-Smith and D. Vanderbilt, Theory of polariza- tion of crystalline solids, Phys. Rev. B47, 1651 (1993)

    1993

  51. [60]

    Gonze and C

    X. Gonze and C. Lee, Dynamical matrices, Born effective charges, dielectric permittivity tensors, and interatomic force constants from density-functional perturbation the- ory, Phys. Rev. B55, 10355 (1997). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank Prof. Dr. Vladimir Fa...

    1997

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.