Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Frequency reproducibility of solid-state Th-229 nuclear clocks

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The 229Th:CaF2 nuclear transition frequency is reproducible to 280 Hz across two crystals and four months at a temperature where its first-order thermal shift vanishes.

desk verdict Solid experimental step for nuclear clocks, but the 280 Hz reproducibility claim needs per-crystal numbers to back it. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.01180 v1 pith:R2G7HXTE submitted 2025-07-01 physics.atom-ph nucl-exphysics.opticsquant-ph

Tian Ooi , Jack F. Doyle , Chuankun Zhang , Jacob S. Higgins , Jun Ye , Kjeld Beeks , Tomas Sikorsky , Thorsten Schumm This is my paper
classification physics.atom-phnucl-exphysics.opticsquant-ph
keywords thorium-229nuclearclocksolid-statefrequencystandardcalciumfluoridecrystalreproducibilityzero-shifttemperatureinhomogeneouslinewidthvacuum-ultravioletcomb
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first systematic test of whether the 229Th nuclear transition in calcium fluoride crystals can serve as a reproducible frequency reference. It identifies a working temperature of 195(5) K where the transition frequency has no first-order dependence on temperature, and it demonstrates that two separately grown crystals with different doping levels agree to 280 Hz (fractionally 1.4e-13) over four months at that temperature. It also shows that the transition linewidth grows linearly with thorium doping concentration and follows a Lorentzian lineshape, pointing to microstrain from randomly distributed dopants as the broadening mechanism. These results matter because they move solid-state nuclear clocks from single-crystal proof-of-principle toward practical, field-deployable frequency standards.

What carries the argument

The mechanism that carries the argument is the electric quadrupole splitting of the 229Th nuclear levels in the CaF2 host, which produces five transition lines with different temperature sensitivities. The paper tracks the two extreme lines: line b (m = ±5/2 → ±3/2), whose frequency shifts least with temperature, and line c (m = ±1/2 → ±1/2), which shifts most. A VUV frequency comb referenced to the 87Sr optical clock measures absolute frequencies, while the crystal temperature is held within 0.1 K and a linear drift correction for the silicon reference cavity is applied to each data point. The zero-shift temperature emerges as the minimum of a quadratic fit of νb versus T; the linewidth-concentration relation and the Lorentzian lineshape are interpreted through random point-defect microstrain broadening of the local electric field gradient.

What would settle it

Re-measure line b at 195 K in the same two crystals for another year while monitoring the silicon cavity against a second, independent optical reference; if the apparent nuclear frequency drifts by more than the 280 Hz scatter, the linear-drift correction is suspect. Alternatively, co-dope crystals with 232Th to raise defect density without adding resonant nuclei: if linewidth does not scale with total thorium concentration, the microstrain-broadening model fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the 229Th:CaF2 nuclear clock transition can serve as a reproducible frequency reference across independently grown crystals and over months of time. For line b, the least temperature-sensitive of the measured quadrupole-split transitions, the center frequency at the zero-shift temperature 195.0(1) K is 2,020,407,298,701.16 kHz with a standard error of 280 Hz for two differently doped crystals over four months; over a full year and across three crystals, the frequencies agree at the kilohertz level after subtracting the measured temperature shifts. The paper also claims that the transition linewidth is set by the host crystal rather than the excitation laser: it is temperature-independent, grows linearly with thorium doping concentration, and is described by a Lorentzian lineshape consistent with microstrain from randomly distributed point defects. A quadratic fit to the temperature dependence places the zero of first-order thermal sensitivity at T0 = 195(5) K, and the more temperature-sensitive line c is proposed as an in-situ thermometer to hold the crystal at that operating point.

Load-bearing premise

The result would be biased if the silicon reference cavity's drift were not exactly linear over the whole measurement span, or if the holder-mounted temperature sensor misread the true crystal temperature by more than 0.1 K.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At 195 K, two differently doped crystals yield the same nuclear transition frequency to 280 Hz, so crystal-to-crystal differences do not prevent using 229Th:CaF2 as a frequency standard.
  • Using line c as an in-situ thermometer could hold the crystal at T0 with 0.06 K uncertainty and suppress temperature-induced frequency shifts below the 10^-18 fractional level.
  • The linewidth's linear growth with doping concentration means lower-doped crystals should give narrower lines and better clock stability, trading against signal strength.
  • A 1 mK temperature reproducibility at T0 would give a line b frequency reproducibility of about 1 mHz, or 6e-19 fractional, so thermal control becomes the dominant practical challenge.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the reproducibility is confirmed against an independent frequency reference, the 229Th:CaF2 line at 195 K could serve as a field-deployable secondary standard for optical frequency dissemination, a step the paper does not explicitly take.
  • The same zero-shift-temperature logic should transfer to compounds where thorium is a lattice constituent rather than a dopant, such as ThF4, where dopant microstrain is absent and linewidths may approach the 1 kHz scale; this is an extrapolation beyond the measured crystals.
  • A simple testable extension is a 232Th co-doping series: if the line b width tracks the sum of 229Th and 232Th concentrations, the broadening is confirmed as strain from the thorium site rather than from radioactivity-related damage.
  • The observed Lorentzian lineshape suggests spectral hole burning or spin echoes should be feasible at high laser power; success would confirm the inhomogeneous nature of the broadening and open coherent nuclear control, both of which the paper only mentions as possibilities.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper reports a multi-crystal, multi-month study of the 229Th:CaF2 nuclear clock transition. The authors characterize the linewidth of two quadrupole-split lines (line b and line c) as a function of temperature and thorium doping concentration in three crystals, observe a linear increase of linewidth with concentration, determine a zero-shift temperature T0 = 195(5) K for line b, and propose a co-thermometry scheme using the temperature-sensitive line c. They report a frequency reproducibility of 280 Hz (fractionally 1.4e-13) for two crystals at 195 K over four months, and kHz-level consistency over one year, all referenced to the JILA Sr clock. The paper also presents a microstrain-broadening interpretation for the observed inhomogeneous linewidths.

Significance. If the stated reproducibility holds, this is a major step for solid-state nuclear clocks, demonstrating that different crystals and long time intervals do not shift the transition frequency beyond the current measurement precision. The work includes careful Lorentzian fitting, explicit disclosure of excluded frequency-swept scans, a plausible microstrain-broadening model, and a concrete path toward in-situ thermometry. The concentration-dependent linewidth data provide useful guidance for crystal growth. However, the central statistical claim requires revision, as detailed below.

major comments (2)
  1. [Fig. 4a / 'Frequency reproducibility over time and crystals'] The 280 Hz value is the standard error of the weighted mean of all 195 K line-b measurements for C10 and C13 combined, not a measure of agreement between the two crystals. A constant frequency offset between C10 and C13 would not be detected if each crystal's own measurements are tightly clustered, because the combined standard error would remain small. The manuscript does not report the mean frequency (or standard deviation) for each crystal separately at 195 K, nor the difference between the two crystal means. Therefore the abstract's claim that 'the reproducibility ... is 280 Hz ... for two differently doped 229Th:CaF2 crystals over four months' is not supported by the displayed statistics. Please provide per-crystal mean frequencies with uncertainties and an explicit comparison (e.g., difference with uncertainty), and revise the wording of the claim if it is not met.
  2. [Methods, 'Data analysis' (silicon cavity drift)] The 280 Hz reproducibility claim relies on subtracting a Si-cavity drift of -15.6 Hz/day from all frequency data. The text states that this drift is extracted from a line fit to the Si3 absolute frequency, but it does not report the residuals of that fit, the uncertainty of the drift rate, or the number of calibration points. If the cavity drift is not exactly linear over the relevant four-month period, the correction would introduce an apparent frequency shift that is not captured by the Lorentzian fit errors. Please quantify the drift-fit residuals and their effect on the 195 K mean and on the claimed reproducibility, or otherwise justify the linear-drift assumption.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Methods, 'Data analysis'] The text states 'a drift of -1.5 Hz/day is extracted' and 'this corresponds to -15.6 Hz/day for the thorium transition frequency'. The factor of about 10.4 is not explained; please state the frequency ratio used for this conversion so the reader can verify it.
  2. [Extended Data Table I] The derived zero-shift temperature T0 = 195(5) K is quoted in the main text but not in the table; adding T0 and its uncertainty derived from the fit parameters would make the analysis more transparent.
  3. [Fig. 2b] The text says the linear fits are 'presented as a visual guide' but then quotes slopes with uncertainties; please clarify whether these are actual fits to the data and report the fit uncertainties consistently.
  4. [Fig. 4a] The reduced chi-squared of 0.4 is reported without the number of data points or degrees of freedom; please include these values so the reader can assess the fit quality.
  5. [General] In a few places the phrase 'sub-kHz reproducibility with a standard error of 280 Hz' conflates the standard error of a weighted mean with reproducibility. Using distinct terms for the precision of the mean and the agreement between independent realizations would improve clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the reproducibility claim is an empirical measurement, not a derivation from fitted inputs or self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is the measured frequency reproducibility of the 229Th:CaF2 nuclear transition at 195 K. This is an empirical result obtained directly from line scans referenced to the Sr clock laser, with a stated standard error of 280 Hz. No equation in the paper defines the reproducibility in terms of the fitted parameters, and the 280 Hz figure is not a prediction derived from the quadratic temperature fit; it is a weighted-mean standard error of directly measured frequencies at 195 K. The zero-shift temperature T0 = 195(5) K is obtained by fitting a quadratic to frequency-versus-temperature data, but this fit is not used to force the 280 Hz reproducibility: the frequency data at 195 K are measured, and the zero-shift temperature only identifies a favorable operating point. The drift correction in Methods uses an external silicon cavity and the JILA Sr clock as references, which is independent calibration rather than a circular input. The paper does cite prior work by the same groups for the excited-state lifetime and earlier temperature characterization, but these are used for data corrections and context, not as the source of the reproducibility result. The microstrain broadening model is presented as an interpretation consistent with external theoretical references, not as a derivation of the measured linewidths. Therefore, no load-bearing step reduces to its own inputs by construction, and there is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claims are empirical measurements referenced to a strontium clock. The free parameters are the fitted temperature coefficients and zero-shift temperature, which are used to correct data and to project the co-thermometry scheme. The main modeling assumption is the linear Si-cavity drift; the microstrain broadening explanation is an interpretation supported by prior solid-state theory.

free parameters (7)
  • T0 (zero-shift temperature) = 195(5) K
    Vertex of quadratic fit to line b center frequency vs temperature; defines the operating point where first-order thermal shift vanishes and anchors the 280 Hz reproducibility measurement.
  • alpha_b = 0.0088(2) kHz/K^2
    Quadratic temperature coefficient for line b, fitted to C10+C13 data (Extended Data Table I); used for temperature corrections and co-thermometry projection.
  • beta_b = -3.44(7) kHz/K
    Linear temperature coefficient for line b; enters co-thermometry shift estimates at T0.
  • gamma_b = 254(7) kHz
    Quadratic fit intercept for line b.
  • alpha_c = -0.0140(4) kHz/K^2
    Quadratic temperature coefficient for line c; used to compute temperature sensitivity for co-thermometry.
  • beta_c = -10.2(2) kHz/K
    Linear temperature coefficient for line c; slope gives ~15.7 kHz/K at 195 K used in co-thermometry estimate.
  • gamma_c = 4210(20) kHz
    Quadratic fit intercept for line c.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Electric quadrupole interaction Hamiltonian and nuclear spin assignments (ground Ig=5/2, isomer Iis=3/2) from prior literature
    Used to identify five quadrupole-split transitions and select lines b and c for study (Fig. 1b).
  • domain assumption 229Th isomeric lifetime tau = 641(4) s from prior measurement (Ref [5])
    Used in the memory-effect correction of the fluorescence detection windows (Methods).
  • ad hoc to paper Silicon cavity (Si3) drift is linear at -1.5 Hz/day over May 2024 to March 2025
    Assumed in Methods to subtract -15.6 Hz/day from thorium frequencies; a nonlinear drift would bias the one-year and four-month reproducibility.
  • domain assumption Microstrain broadening model: random point defects with 1/r^3 strain falloff yield a Lorentzian lineshape
    Adopted from Refs [36,40] to explain concentration-dependent linewidth; the paper states this as a suggestion, not a demonstrated mechanism.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Frequency reproducibility of solid-state Th-229 nuclear clocks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/R2G7HXTE

@misc{pith2026250701180,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Frequency reproducibility of solid-state Th-229 nuclear clocks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/R2G7HXTE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.01180}
}
abstract

Solid-state $^{229}$Th nuclear clocks are set to provide new opportunities for precision metrology and fundamental physics. Taking advantage of a nuclear transition's inherent low sensitivity to its environment, orders of magnitude more emitters can be hosted in a solid-state crystal compared to current optical lattice atomic clocks. Furthermore, solid-state systems needing only simple thermal control are key to the development of field-deployable compact clocks. In this work, we explore and characterize the frequency reproducibility of the $^{229}$Th:CaF$_2$ nuclear clock transition, a key performance metric for all clocks. We measure the transition linewidth and center frequency as a function of the doping concentration, temperature, and time. We report the concentration-dependent inhomogeneous linewidth of the nuclear transition, limited by the intrinsic host crystal properties. We determine an optimal working temperature for the $^{229}$Th:CaF$_2$ nuclear clock at 195(5) K where the first-order thermal sensitivity vanishes. This would enable in-situ temperature co-sensing using different quadrupole-split lines, reducing the temperature-induced systematic shift below the 10$^{-18}$ fractional frequency uncertainty level. At 195 K, the reproducibility of the nuclear transition frequency is 280 Hz (fractionally $1.4\times10^{-13}$) for two differently doped $^{229}$Th:CaF$_2$ crystals over four months. These results form the foundation for understanding, controlling, and harnessing the coherent nuclear excitation of $^{229}$Th in solid-state hosts, and for their applications in constraining temporal variations of fundamental constants.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.01180 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Context for the characterization of nuclear clock reproducibility. ⃗ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Characterization of the nuclear clock transition linewidth in CaF [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Temperature reproducibility of the nuclear clock. For both plots, the optical frequency of the nuclear clock transition [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Time record of the line b nuclear transition frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A First Bound on the Moffat Energy and Thorium--229 Clock as a Probe of the Nonlocal Time-Energy Structure

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Published 229Th clock data, under an assumed quadratic nonlocal frequency-shift with unit coefficient, set E_M > 22.3 MeV (direct), >1.72 GeV (enhanced), and up to ~27 TeV (nuclear-scale illustration).

  2. Probing the Linewidth of the 12.4-keV Solid-State $^{45}$Sc Isomeric Resonance

    quant-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Solid-state 45Sc resonance shows environmental broadening of at least 500 natural linewidths, with a measured internal conversion coefficient of 390(60).

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    A. D. Ludlow, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, E. Peik, and P. Schmidt, Reviews of Modern Physics 87, 637 (2015)

    2015

  2. [2]

    Aeppli, K

    A. Aeppli, K. Kim, W. Warfield, M. S. Safronova, and J. Ye, Physical Review Letters 133, 023401 (2024)

    2024

  3. [3]

    High-Stability Single-Ion Clock with $5.5\times10^{-19}$ Systematic Uncertainty

    M. Marshall, D. R. Castillo, W. Dworschack, A. Aep- pli, K. Kim, D. Lee, W. Warfield, N. Nardelli, T. Fortier, J. Ye, D. Leibrandt, and D. Hume, (2025), arXiv:2504.13071v1 [physics.atom-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Bothwell, C

    T. Bothwell, C. J. Kennedy, A. Aeppli, D. Kedar, J. M. Robinson, E. Oelker, A. Staron, and J. Ye, Nature 602, 420 (2022)

    2022

  5. [5]

    Zhang, T

    C. Zhang, T. Ooi, J. S. Higgins, J. F. Doyle, L. von der Wense, K. Beeks, A. Leitner, G. A. Kazakov, P. Li, P. G. Thirolf, T. Schumm, and J. Ye, Nature 633, 63 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Beeks, T

    K. Beeks, T. Sikorsky, V. Rosecker, M. Pressler, F. Schaden, D. Werban, N. Hosseini, L. Rudischer, F. Schneider, P. Berwian, J. Friedrich, D. Hainz, J. Welch, J. H. Sterba, G. Kazakov, and T. Schumm, Scientific Reports 13, 3897 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Beeks, T

    K. Beeks, T. Sikorsky, F. Schaden, M. Pressler, F. Schnei- der, B. N. Koch, T. Pronebner, D. Werban, N. Hosseini, G. Kazakov, J. Welch, J. H. Sterba, F. Kraus, and T. Schumm, Physical Review B 109, 094111 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Tkalya, V

    E. Tkalya, V. Varlamov, V. Lomonosov, and S. Nikulin, Physica Scripta 53, 296 (1996)

    work page 1996

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    Peik and C

    E. Peik and C. Tamm, Europhysics Letters 61, 181 (2003)

    2003

  2. [10]

    E. Peik, T. Schumm, M. S. Safronova, A. P´ alffy, J. Weit- enberg, and P. G. Thirolf, Quantum Science and Tech- nology 6, 034002 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    Beeks, T

    K. Beeks, T. Sikorsky, T. Schumm, J. Thielking, M. V. Okhapkin, and E. Peik, Nature Reviews Physics 3, 238 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    von der Wense and B

    L. von der Wense and B. Seiferle, The European Physical Journal A 56, 277 (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    W. G. Rellergert, D. DeMille, R. R. Greco, M. P. Hehlen, J. R. Torgerson, and E. R. Hudson, Physical Review Letters 104, 200802 (2010)

    2010

  6. [14]

    G. A. Kazakov, A. N. Litvinov, V. I. Romanenko, L. P. Yatsenko, A. V. Romanenko, M. Schreitl, G. Winkler, and T. Schumm, New Journal of Physics 14, 083019 (2012)

    2012

  7. [15]

    von der Wense, B

    L. von der Wense, B. Seiferle, M. Laatiaoui, J. B. Neu- mayr, H.-J. Maier, H.-F. Wirth, C. Mokry, J. Runke, K. Eberhardt, C. E. D¨ ullmann, N. G. Trautmann, and P. G. Thirolf, Nature 533, 47 (2016)

    2016

  8. [16]

    Thielking, M

    J. Thielking, M. V. Okhapkin, P. G lowacki, D. M. Meier, L. von der Wense, B. Seiferle, C. E. D¨ ullmann, P. G. Thirolf, and E. Peik, Nature 556, 321 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Seiferle, L

    B. Seiferle, L. Von Der Wense, P. V. Bilous, I. Amers- dorffer, C. Lemell, F. Libisch, S. Stellmer, T. Schumm, C. E. D¨ ullmann, A. P´ alffy, and P. G. Thirolf, Nature 573, 243 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    Masuda, A

    T. Masuda, A. Yoshimi, A. Fujieda, H. Fujimoto, H. Haba, H. Hara, T. Hiraki, H. Kaino, Y. Kasamatsu, S. Kitao, K. Konashi, Y. Miyamoto, K. Okai, S. Okubo, N. Sasao, M. Seto, T. Schumm, Y. Shigekawa, K. Suzuki, S. Stellmer, K. Tamasaku, S. Uetake, M. Watanabe, T. Watanabe, Y. Y...

    2019

  11. [19]

    Yamaguchi, H

    A. Yamaguchi, H. Muramatsu, T. Hayashi, N. Yuasa, K. Nakamura, M. Takimoto, H. Haba, K. Konashi, M. Watanabe, H. Kikunaga, K. Maehata, N. Yamasaki, and K. Mitsuda, Physical Review Letters 123, 222501 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    Sikorsky, J

    T. Sikorsky, J. Geist, D. Hengstler, S. Kempf, L. Gastaldo, C. Enss, C. Mokry, J. Runke, C. E. D¨ ullmann, P. Wobrauschek, K. Beeks, V. Rosecker, J. H. Sterba, G. Kazakov, T. Schumm, and A. Fleischmann, Physical Review Letters 125, 142503 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    Kraemer, J

    S. Kraemer, J. Moens, M. Athanasakis-Kaklamanakis, S. Bara, K. Beeks, P. Chhetri, K. Chrysalidis, A. Claessens, T. E. Cocolios, J. G. M. Correia, H. D. Witte, R. Ferrer, S. Geldhof, R. Heinke, N. Hosseini, M. Huyse, U. K¨ oster, Y. Kudryavtsev, M. Laatiaoui, 8 R. Lica, G. Magc...

    2023

  14. [22]

    Tiedau, M

    J. Tiedau, M. Okhapkin, K. Zhang, J. Thielk- ing, G. Zitzer, E. Peik, F. Schaden, T. Pronebner, I. Morawetz, L. T. De Col, F. Schneider, A. Leitner, M. Pressler, G. Kazakov, K. Beeks, T. Sikorsky, and T. Schumm, Physical Review Letters132, 182501 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Elwell, C

    R. Elwell, C. Schneider, J. Jeet, J. Terhune, H. Morgan, A. Alexandrova, H. Tran Tan, A. Derevianko, and E. R. Hudson, Physical Review Letters 133, 013201 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Zhang, P

    C. Zhang, P. Li, J. Jiang, L. von der Wense, J. F. Doyle, M. E. Fermann, and J. Ye, Optics Letters 47, 5591 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    Fine-structure constant sen- sitivity of the Th-229 nuclear clock transition,

    K. Beeks, G. A. Kazakov, F. Schaden, I. Morawetz, L. T. d. Col, T. Riebner, M. Bartokos, T. Sikorsky, T. Schumm, C. Zhang, T. Ooi, J. S. Higgins, J. F. Doyle, J. Ye, and M. S. Safronova, “Fine-structure constant sen- sitivity of the Th-229 nuclear clock transition,” (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Zhang, L

    C. Zhang, L. von der Wense, J. F. Doyle, J. S. Hig- gins, T. Ooi, H. U. Friebel, J. Ye, R. Elwell, J. E. S. Terhune, H. W. T. Morgan, A. N. Alexandrova, H. B. Tran Tan, A. Derevianko, and E. R. Hudson, Nature 636, 603 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    229Th Nuclear Spectroscopy in an Opaque Material: Laser-Based Con- version Electron M¨ ossbauer Spectroscopy of 229ThO2,

    R. Elwell, J. E. S. Terhune, C. Schneider, H. W. T. Mor- gan, H. B. T. Tan, U. C. Perera, D. A. Rehn, M. C. Alfonso, L. v. d. Wense, B. Seiferle, K. Scharl, P. G. Thi- rolf, A. Derevianko, and E. R. Hudson, “ 229Th Nuclear Spectroscopy in an Opaque Material: Laser-Based Con- v...

    2025

  20. [28]

    J. S. Higgins, T. Ooi, J. F. Doyle, C. Zhang, J. Ye, K. Beeks, T. Sikorsky, and T. Schumm, Physical Re- view Letters 134, 113801 (2025)

    2025

  21. [29]

    Takatori, M

    S. Takatori, M. Pimon, S. Pollitt, M. Bartokos, K. Beeks, A. Gr¨ uneis, T. Hiraki, T. Honma, N. Hosseini, A. Leitner, T. Masuda, I. Morawetz, K. Nitta, K. Okai, T. Rieb- ner, F. Schaden, T. Schumm, O. Sekizawa, T. Siko- rsky, Y. Takahashi, L. Toscani De Col, R. Yamamoto, T. Yo...

    2025

  22. [30]

    Nalikowski, V

    K. Nalikowski, V. Veryazov, K. Beeks, T. Schumm, and M. Kro´ snicki, Physical Review B111, 115103 (2025)

    2025

  23. [31]

    Dunlap and G

    B. Dunlap and G. Kalvius, in Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of the Actinides, Vol. II (1985) pp. 331– 434

    1985

  24. [32]

    Oelker, R

    E. Oelker, R. B. Hutson, C. J. Kennedy, L. Sonder- house, T. Bothwell, A. Goban, D. Kedar, C. Sanner, J. M. Robinson, G. E. Marti, D. G. Matei, T. Legero, M. Giunta, R. Holzwarth, F. Riehle, U. Sterr, and J. Ye, Nature Photonics 13, 714 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    W. R. Milner, J. M. Robinson, C. J. Kennedy, T. Both- well, D. Kedar, D. G. Matei, T. Legero, U. Sterr, F. Riehle, H. Leopardi, T. M. Fortier, J. A. Sherman, J. Levine, J. Yao, J. Ye, and E. Oelker, Physical Review Letters 123, 173201 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    Eshelby, in Solid State Physics, Vol

    J. Eshelby, in Solid State Physics, Vol. 3 (Elsevier, 1956) pp. 79–144

    1956

  27. [35]

    J. W. Flocken and J. R. Hardy, Physical Review B 1, 2447 (1970)

    1970

  28. [36]

    A. M. Stoneham, Reviews of Modern Physics 41, 82 (1969)

    1969

  29. [37]

    Pelzl, H

    J. Pelzl, H. Vargas, D. Dautreppe, and H. Schulz, Jour- nal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 36, 791 (1975)

    1975

  30. [38]

    Kawamura, E

    H. Kawamura, E. Otsuka, and K. Ishiwatari, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 11, 1064 (1956)

    1956

  31. [39]

    Kanert, D

    O. Kanert, D. Kotzur, and M. Mehring, physica status solidi (b) 36, 291 (1969)

    1969

  32. [40]

    M. H. Cohen and F. Reif, in Solid State Physics, Vol. 5, edited by F. Seitz and D. Turnbull (Academic Press,

  33. [41]

    Q. Gong, S. Tao, C. Zhao, Y. Hang, S. Zhu, and L. Ma, Inorganic Chemistry 63, 3807 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    Beeks, The nuclear excitation of Thorium-229 in the CaF2 environment : Development of a crystalline nuclear clock, Thesis, Technische Universit¨ at Wien

    K. Beeks, The nuclear excitation of Thorium-229 in the CaF2 environment : Development of a crystalline nuclear clock, Thesis, Technische Universit¨ at Wien

  35. [43]

    R. C. Pastor and K. Arita, Materials Research Bulletin 9, 579 (1974)

    1974

  36. [44]

    A spinless crystal for a high- performance solid-state 229Th nuclear clock,

    H. W. T. Morgan, J. E. S. Terhune, R. Elwell, H. B. T. Tan, U. C. Perera, A. Derevianko, E. R. Hudson, and A. N. Alexandrova, “A spinless crystal for a high- performance solid-state 229Th nuclear clock,” (2025)

    2025

  37. [45]

    Reissner, in Modern M¨ ossbauer Spectroscopy: New Challenges Based on Cutting-Edge Techniques, edited by Y

    M. Reissner, in Modern M¨ ossbauer Spectroscopy: New Challenges Based on Cutting-Edge Techniques, edited by Y. Yoshida and G. Langouche (Springer, Singapore,

  38. [46]

    Liechti and R

    O. Liechti and R. Kind, Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969) 85, 480 (1989)

    1969

  39. [47]

    Hiraki, K

    T. Hiraki, K. Okai, M. Bartokos, K. Beeks, H. Fuji- moto, Y. Fukunaga, H. Haba, Y. Kasamatsu, S. Ki- tao, A. Leitner, T. Masuda, M. Guan, N. Nagasawa, R. Ogake, M. Pimon, M. Pressler, N. Sasao, F. Schaden, T. Schumm, M. Seto, Y. Shigekawa, K. Shimizu, T. Siko- rsky, K. Tamasak...

    2024

  40. [48]

    Hiraki, K

    T. Hiraki, K. Beeks, M. Bartokos, H. Fujimoto, Y. Fuku- naga, H. Haba, Y. Kasamatsu, S. Kitao, A. Leit- ner, T. Masuda, G. Ming, N. Nagasawa, R. Ogake, K. Okai, M. Pimon, M. Pressler, N. Sasao, F. Schaden, T. Schumm, M. Seto, Y. Shigekawa, K. Shimizu, T. Siko- rsky, K. Tamasak...

    2024

  41. [49]

    Schaden, T

    F. Schaden, T. Riebner, I. Morawetz, L. T. De Col, G. A. Kazakov, K. Beeks, T. Sikorsky, T. Schumm, K. Zhang, V. Lal, G. Zitzer, J. Tiedau, M. V. Okhapkin, and E. Peik, Physical Review Research 7, L022036 (2025)

    2025

  42. [50]

    J. E. S. Terhune, R. Elwell, H. B. T. Tan, U. C. Per- era, H. W. T. Morgan, A. N. Alexandrova, A. Dere- vianko, and E. R. Hudson, Physisical Review Research 7, L022062 (2025)

    2025

  43. [51]

    X-ray induced quenching of the 229Th clock isomer in CaF 2,

    M. Guan, M. Bartokos, K. Beeks, H. Fujimoto, Y. Fuku- naga, H. Haba, T. Hiraki, Y. Kasamatsu, S. Ki- tao, A. Leitner, T. Masuda, N. Nagasawa, K. Okai, R. Ogake, M. Pimon, M. Pressler, N. Sasao, F. Schaden, T. Schumm, M. Seto, Y. Shigekawa, K. Shimizu, T. Siko- rsky, K. Tamasak...

    2025 arXiv

  44. [52]

    V. V. Flambaum, Physical Review Letters 97, 092502 (2006)

    2006

  45. [53]

    Implications 9 of the laser excitation of the Th-229 nucleus for dark matter searches,

    E. Fuchs, F. Kirk, E. Madge, C. Paranjape, E. Peik, G. Perez, W. Ratzinger, and J. Tiedau, “Implications 9 of the laser excitation of the Th-229 nucleus for dark matter searches,” (2024)

    2024

  46. [54]

    On the sensitivity of nu- clear clocks to new physics,

    A. Caputo, D. Gazit, H.-W. Hammer, J. Kopp, G. Paz, G. Perez, and K. Springmann, “On the sensitivity of nu- clear clocks to new physics,” (2024), arXiv:2407.17526

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    R. J. Jones, K. D. Moll, M. J. Thorpe, and J. Ye, Phys- ical Review Letters 94, 193201 (2005)

    2005

  48. [56]

    Gohle, T

    C. Gohle, T. Udem, M. Herrmann, J. Rauschenberger, R. Holzwarth, H. A. Schuessler, F. Krausz, and T. W. H¨ ansch, Nature436, 234 (2005)

    2005

  49. [57]

    Matei, T

    D. Matei, T. Legero, S. H¨ afner, C. Grebing, R. Weyrich, W. Zhang, L. Sonderhouse, J. Robinson, J. Ye, F. Riehle, and U. Sterr, Physical Review Letters 118, 263202 (2017)

    2017

  50. [58]

    Stellmer, M

    S. Stellmer, M. Schreitl, and T. Schumm, Scientific Re- ports 5, 15580 (2015). Methods F requency comb and detection setup The spectroscopic data were taken using a vacuum ul- traviolet frequency comb generated by cavity-enhanced high harmonic generation (HHG). The details of ...

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.