Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Experimental Multiport-Network Parameter Estimation and Optimization for Multi-Bit RIS

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For an unknown multi-bit RIS in an unknown rich-scattering environment, a hybrid closed-form-plus-gradient estimate of the multiport-network parameters predicts unseen channel matrices to 48.5 dB accuracy.

desk verdict Solid experimental study of MNT parameter estimation for multi-bit RIS, but the SVD step is mis-justified under mutual coupling and the MC-unawareness conclusion is setup-specific. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.02168 v2 pith:U37XFT5V submitted 2025-07-02 physics.app-ph eess.SP

Philipp del Hougne This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.app-pheess.SP
keywords reconfigurableintelligentsurfacemultiport-networktheorymutualcouplingparameterestimationvirtualVNAreverberationchamberRISoptimizationMIMO
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Physics-consistent models of RIS-parametrized wireless channels treat the environment as a multiport network whose tunable elements are variable loads, but using these models in practice requires knowing both the RIS design and the radio environment. This paper shows how to estimate a matching set of multiport-network parameters directly from end-to-end channel measurements in an unknown rich-scattering environment, using one reference measurement, $N_S$ single-element toggles, and $n$ extra random configurations. The estimation combines closed-form SVD steps with gradient descent and handles multi-bit (here 6-bit) RIS elements whose load states are unknown; the resulting model reaches 48.5 dB accuracy against 3000 unseen measured configurations. When the estimated model is used to optimize RIS configurations, it clearly outperforms random tuning on four communications KPIs, although a much simpler mutual-coupling-unaware cascaded model achieves nearly the same optimized performance despite being about 17 dB less accurate. The practical consequence is that physics-consistent channel models for reconfigurable intelligent surfaces can be obtained without design knowledge or environment simulation, and that ignoring mutual coupling may be acceptable for some performance-oriented tasks.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the multiport-network expression $$\mathbf{H} = \mathbf{S}_{RT} + \mathbf{S}_{RS}\bigl(\mathbf{\Phi}^{-1} - \mathbf{S}_{SS}\bigr)^{-1}\mathbf{S}_{ST},$$ with $\mathbf{\Phi}=\mathrm{diag}(\mathbf{c})$ the diagonal matrix of tunable load reflection coefficients and $\mathbf{S}$ the scattering matrix of the static part of the environment. Its role is to compress all structural scattering and environmental scattering into a finite set of parameters whose number grows with the number of antennas and RIS elements, not with the complexity of the RIS design or environment. The estimation engine is a three-step hybridization: one reference measurement sets $\tilde{\mathbf{S}}_{RT}$; toggling the $i$th RIS element yields a rank-one channel difference whose dominant left and right singular vectors capture, up to scale, the $i$th columns of $\tilde{\mathbf{S}}_{RS}$ and $\tilde{\mathbf{S}}_{ST}$; and gradient descent then solves for the scales $\mathbf{a}, \mathbf{b}$, the symmetric coupling matrix $\tilde{\mathbf{S}}_{SS}$, and the load reflection coefficients $\tilde{\mathbf{s}}$. The load vector $\tilde{\mathbf{s}}$ is learned rather than assumed, which is what allows multi-bit elements—more than two states per element cannot be handled by arbitrarily fixing $\tilde{\mathbf{s}}$. Forward evaluations during optimization are accelerated with the Woodbury identity.

What would settle it

Directly measure the full scattering matrix $\mathbf{S}$ and load states $\mathbf{s}$ of the modular testbed with a 16-port VNA, compute the channel predictions from those physical parameters, and compare them with the predictions of the hybrid estimate on the same unseen configurations; a systematic discrepancy exceeding the 65.9 dB measurement SNR would show that the estimated matching set does not represent the physics, while agreement would confirm that the rank-one-plus-gradient decomposition captures the true mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a matching set of multiport-network-theory (MNT) parameters—an $N \times N$ scattering matrix $\mathbf{S}$ for the static parts of the RIS-parametrized environment together with the set of accessible load reflection coefficients $\mathbf{s}$—can be estimated from ordinary end-to-end channel measurements without knowing the RIS element design or the propagation environment. Because only the mapping from control word $\mathbf{w}$ to channel $\mathbf{H}$ matters for optimization, the estimate need not be physically unambiguous; any parameter set that lets (1) reproduce the measured channels is sufficient. The estimation proceeds by (i) taking one reference channel measurement, (ii) for each RIS element, measuring the channel after toggling only that element and using the rank-one SVD structure $\Delta_i = \mathbf{U}_i \Sigma_i \mathbf{V}_i^\dagger$ to fix the coupling vectors $\tilde{\mathbf{S}}_{RS,i}$ and $\tilde{\mathbf{S}}_{ST,i}$ up to scalar factors, and (iii) running gradient descent over those scalars, the symmetric mutual-coupling matrix $\tilde{\mathbf{S}}_{SS}$, and the load states $\tilde{\mathbf{s}}$ on $n$ additional random configurations. The author experimentally validates the approach at 2.45 GHz with eight 6-bit-programmable RIS elements of unknown design in a reverberation chamber, reporting an average accuracy of 48.5 dB for the MNT model against 3000 unseen measured configurations, versus 31.2 dB for a mutual-coupling-unaware cascaded model and below 20 dB for linear regression. The same estimated models are then used with coordinate descent to optimize four key performance indicators, and the optimized configurations are verified experimentally; the MNT and cascaded models yield nearly equal end-to-end gains, whereas linear regression performs clearly worse.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the static parts of the RIS-parametrized environment, including the commercial antennas and phase-shifter hardware, act as a linear, passive, reciprocal multiport network with lumped ports at 2.45 GHz, and that each RIS element's tunable state is fully captured by a single scalar complex reflection coefficient; if higher-order effects such as frequency dispersion, radiation-dependent loading, or phase-shifter nonlinearity break this lumped-port description, the estimated parameters may fail to generalize to configurations outside the training set.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • An off-the-shelf multi-bit RIS in an unknown environment can be characterized without any design knowledge: $1+N_S+n$ channel measurements yield a predictive model that maps any control word to the channel matrix.
  • Parameter ambiguities do not have to be resolved for optimization; any matching set that reproduces the measured configurations is usable, which is what makes the estimation feasible in practice.
  • Model accuracy saturates when $n$ reaches the order of the number of unknowns, and extra receive/transmit antennas help only up to a point—quantified gains from $N_A=2$ to 4 are large (about 15 dB for MNT) while $N_A=6$ and 8 add little.
  • The MC-unaware cascaded model, despite a 17 dB lower accuracy, delivers nearly the same optimized SISO and MIMO metrics as the MC-aware MNT model in the tested rich-scattering environment, while linear regression is clearly inferior.
  • The MNT model reaches 48.5 dB accuracy on unseen configurations, indicating that unobserved physical degrees of freedom of the 6-bit elements do not materially degrade generalization in this setup.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the paper's experiments use a moderate-coupling eight-element array, the near-equivalence of MNT and CASC may not hold in stronger-coupling regimes; a testable extension is to repeat the KPI comparison with denser arrays, beyond-diagonal RIS, or stacked intelligent metasurfaces, where mutual coupling plays a larger role.
  • The rotation of $\tilde{\mathbf{s}}$ across random seeds visible in the paper's Fig. 2 suggests that the learned load states are not physical measurements; any use of the estimated parameters should treat them as an equivalent model, not as hardware diagnostics.
  • Since Step 2's rank-one structure does not depend on the environment's complexity, the same estimator could in principle calibrate RIS-aided channels in outdoor or indoor line-of-sight settings, but that generalization goes beyond the paper's reverberation-chamber validation.
  • The large model-accuracy gap versus the small end-to-end performance gap implies that for system-level optimization a cheap cascaded model may suffice, whereas inverse problems or sensing tasks that rely on precise channel predictions may be where the accurate MNT model earns its extra calibration cost.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a hybrid two-stage procedure for estimating multiport-network-theory (MNT) parameters of a wireless channel that is parametrized by a multi-bit reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS), without knowing the RIS hardware or the propagation environment. In Step 2, single-element control changes are used with a rank-one SVD to initialize the coupling vectors between antennas and RIS elements; in Step 3, gradient descent refines the remaining scaling factors, the mutual-coupling matrix, and the load states. The method is experimentally tested in a reverberation chamber with an eight-element, 6-bit RIS prototype, and is benchmarked against a mutual-coupling-unaware cascaded model and a linear regression model. The reported MNT model accuracy reaches 48.5 dB on 3000 unseen configurations, while the cascaded model reaches 31.2 dB; nevertheless, for the four considered end-to-end performance metrics, the cascaded model achieves nearly the same performance as the MNT model.

Significance. If the central claim held in full generality, the paper would fill a real gap: it would provide a practical recipe for estimating physics-consistent MNT parameters from end-to-end measurements in unknown rich-scattering environments, including for multi-bit RIS elements. The experimental validation on unseen configurations is a genuine strength and goes beyond many purely numerical studies. The paper is also careful to identify parameter ambiguities and to test the optimization consequences with directly measured channels, which is methodologically sound. The main significance is therefore contingent on whether the SVD-initialized model family really spans the full MNT model; as argued below, that point is not established and needs revision.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section IV.A, Step 2] The claim that a single-element change produces a rank-one matrix whose singular vectors are colinear with the i-th column of S_RS and the i-th row of S_ST is not correct for the general MNT model. With D = Phi^{-1} - S_SS, a change delta in the i-th load gives, by the Woodbury identity, Delta_i = -[delta/(1+delta (D^{-1})_{ii})] (S_RS D^{-1} e_i)(e_i^T D^{-1} S_ST). These vectors are colinear with S_RS e_i and e_i^T S_ST only when D^{-1} is diagonal, which in general requires S_SS to be diagonal. Step 3 keeps the SVD-derived directions fixed and optimizes only the scalar factors a_i and b_i, together with S_SS and the load estimates; it never re-estimates the directions. The fitted model is therefore a restricted subclass of the full MNT model when off-diagonal mutual coupling is present. Since the reported accuracy gap between MNT and CASC is about 17 dB (Section V.B), the off-diagonal part of S_SS appears to be material in the validation, so this is not merely a hypothetical limitation. The manuscript should either restrict the claim to the case of diagonal S_SS (or to weak mutual coupling), allow the directions to be refined in Step 3, or provide a proof that the SVD-initialized family can still represent the MNT map for arbitrary reciprocal S_SS. As written, the derivation in Step 2 does not support the general claim that a matching set of MNT parameters is estimated.
  2. [Section IV.A and Section VII] The conclusion states that the paper 'developed and experimentally validated the first hybrid MNT parameter estimation technique', and the Remark in Section I asserts that the technique applies directly to beyond-diagonal RIS and stacked intelligent metasurfaces. Because of the Step 2 issue above, the experimental results validate only the SVD-initialized constrained model on one particular eight-element, 6-bit prototype at one operating frequency. The extension to other hardware classes, especially those with strong mutual coupling, is an assertion rather than a demonstrated consequence. A concrete way to strengthen the claim would be to repeat the estimation with the RIS elements at the two spacings reported (lambda0/2 and lambda0/4) and to show whether the same accuracy is achieved when the SVD directions are intentionally perturbed, or to derive the conditions under which the constrained family remains exact. Without such evidence, the general 'MNT parameter estimation' claim is broader than what the paper establishes.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section IV.A, Step 2] The notation tilde S_RS_i and tilde S_ST_i is confusing: one is a column of the left factor and the other is a row of the right factor. Please clarify the orientation explicitly, for example by writing (S_RS)_i and (S_ST)_{i,:}.
  2. [Section V.A] The SNR (65.9 dB) and stability (53.2 dB) metrics are described only in words. Please state whether these are averages over ports, over the two VNA cascades, or over a specific set of configurations, and report the spread if available.
  3. [Section V.B, Equation (3)] The metric zeta is said to be 'floored at 0 dB' in the caption of Fig. 2a, but the flooring is not stated in the main text near Equation (3). Please add one sentence explaining that negative values are clipped to 0 dB.
  4. [Table I] The optimization results are reported for a single representative setup and without variability information. Since the parameter estimation is repeated with five random seeds and the coordinate-descent initialization depends on the measured configurations, reporting the spread of the KPI values across seeds or across a few independent runs would make the small MNT-vs-CASC differences in Table I more convincing.
  5. [Section VI.C] The claim that MC-unaware cascaded models 'can yield very good experimental performances' is based on one hardware configuration and one set of KPIs. The sentence should be tempered to reflect the limited experimental scope, for example by saying 'in the tested setup'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the MNT parameter estimates are validated on unseen measured configurations, and self-citations are background rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is not circular because every accuracy and performance claim is evaluated against experimentally measured ground truth on configurations not used for estimation. Step 1 fixes S_RT to a measured baseline reference channel. Step 2 extracts SVD directions from measured single-element perturbations. Step 3 fits the remaining parameters by gradient descent to a separate set of n random configurations. The reported 48.5 dB accuracy is computed on 3000 unseen realizations of w using the measured H as ground truth, and all optimized RIS configurations are re-measured directly rather than evaluated through the model. The paper's many self-citations, including the Virtual VNA works and [12], [14], are used as background or as prior algorithmic components, not as load-bearing evidence for the new estimator. The Step 2 claim that the SVD vectors of Delta_i are colinear with the true S_RS_i and S_ST_i is mathematically questionable when S_SS has significant off-diagonal entries, since the exact rank-one factors are S_RS D^{-1} e_i and e_i^T D^{-1} S_ST, which are colinear with the simple port vectors only when S_SS is diagonal. However, this is a potential correctness or robustness limitation, not a circular reduction: no predicted quantity is identical by construction to a fitted parameter or to an input measurement. Therefore no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the multiport-network model (Eq. 1) and the lumped-port assumptions about the environment. The estimated parameters (S_RS, S_ST, S_SS, s, and the reference matrix S_RT) are all fitted to measurement data, which is the intended procedure rather than an ad hoc trick. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • tilde_S_RT (reference channel matrix) = set equal to measured H(w0)
    Defined in Step 1 as the measured channel at reference configuration w0, absorbing the initial loading effect.
  • a_i (scaling factors for SVD-derived S_RS columns) = estimated via gradient descent
    Step 3 jointly estimates these complex scalars to match the measured channel matrices.
  • b_i (scaling factors for SVD-derived S_ST rows) = estimated via gradient descent
    Step 3 jointly estimates these complex scalars; only the product a_i b_i is fixed by the rank-one update.
  • tilde_S_SS (symmetric mutual-coupling matrix) = estimated via gradient descent
    The NS(NS+1)/2 complex entries of the symmetric coupling matrix are fitted in Step 3.
  • tilde_s (estimated load reflection coefficients for m=64 states) = estimated via gradient descent
    The reflection coefficients of the phase-shifter states are unknown and fitted; they match the physical s up to scaling, rotation and translation.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The static parts of the RIS-parametrized radio environment are linear, passive and reciprocal.
    Section II, first assumption; justifies the scattering matrix description S and symmetry of S_SS.
  • domain assumption All antenna ports and tunable elements can be described as lumped components at the operating frequency (2.45 GHz).
    Section II, third assumption; needed for a finite N-port scattering matrix model.
  • domain assumption The MNT channel relation H = S_RT + S_RS (Phi^{-1} - S_SS)^{-1} S_ST holds for the experimental system.
    Eq. (1); this is the theoretical model that must accurately represent the physical device.
  • ad hoc to paper The available loads are identical across RIS elements (s_i = s).
    Section III; simplifies estimation, but the authors state it can be relaxed.
  • ad hoc to paper The gradient descent in Step 3 converges to a parameter set that maps w to H well enough for optimization.
    The paper relies on empirical validation with five random seeds instead of a convergence proof.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Experimental Multiport-Network Parameter Estimation and Optimization for Multi-Bit RIS." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/U37XFT5V

@misc{pith2026250702168,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Experimental Multiport-Network Parameter Estimation and Optimization for Multi-Bit RIS},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/U37XFT5V}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.02168}
}
read the original abstract

Physics-consistent theoretical studies on RIS-parametrized wireless channels use models from multiport-network theory (MNT) to capture mutual-coupling (MC) effects. However, in practice, RIS design and radio environment are partially or completely unknown. We fill a research gap on how to estimate the MNT model parameters in such experimentally relevant scenarios. Our technique efficiently combines closed-form and gradient-descent steps, and it can be applied to multi-bit-programmable RIS elements. We discuss inevitable (but operationally irrelevant) parameter ambiguities. We experimentally validate our technique in an unknown rich-scattering environment parametrized by eight 6-bit-programmable RIS elements of unknown design. We experimentally evaluate the performance of RIS configurations optimized with the estimated MNT model and an MC-unaware cascaded model. While the models differ in accuracy by up to 17 dB, the end-to-end performance differences are small.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.02168 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Experimental setup (top cover removed to show interior). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Average accuracy achieved by the MNT ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Ambiguity-Aware Segmented Estimation of Mutual Coupling in Large RIS: Algorithm and Experimental Validation

    physics.app-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A segmented estimation algorithm recovers the mutual-coupling parameters of a 100-element RIS and yields far more accurate channel predictions than MC-unaware models, though the optimization gains are moderate.

  2. Frozen differential scattering in reconfigurable complex media

    physics.optics 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A localized perturbation makes the differential scattering matrix rank one, so the change in the output wavefront is always the same shape regardless of the input wavefront.

  3. Wireless Multi-Port Sensing: Virtual-VNA-Enabled De-Embedding of an Over-the-Air Fixture

    physics.app-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A backscatter-modulation method, built on the author's Virtual VNA techniques, wirelessly recovers the full scattering matrix of passive multi-port circuits in a complex radio environment, validated at 2.45 GHz.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

15 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    A universal framework for multiport network analysis of reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,

    M. Nerini et al., “A universal framework for multiport network analysis of reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. , vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 14 575–14 590, 2024

    2024

  2. [2]

    End-to-end mutual coupling aware communication model for reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: An electromagnetic-compliant approach based on mutual impedances,

    G. Gradoni and M. Di Renzo, “End-to-end mutual coupling aware communication model for reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: An electromagnetic-compliant approach based on mutual impedances,” IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. , vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 938–942, 2021

    2021

  3. [3]

    PhysFad: Physics-based end-to-end channel modeling of RIS-parametrized environments with adjustable fading,

    R. Faqiri et al., “PhysFad: Physics-based end-to-end channel modeling of RIS-parametrized environments with adjustable fading,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 580–595, 2023

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    SARIS: Scattering aware reconfigurable intelligent surface model and optimization for complex propagation channels,

    P. Mursia et al. , “SARIS: Scattering aware reconfigurable intelligent surface model and optimization for complex propagation channels,” IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. , vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1921–1925, 2023

    work page 1921

  5. [5]

    Systematic physics-compliant analysis of over-the-air channel equalization in RIS-parametrized wireless networks-on-chip,

    J. Tapie et al. , “Systematic physics-compliant analysis of over-the-air channel equalization in RIS-parametrized wireless networks-on-chip,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 2026–2038, 2024

    2026

  6. [6]

    Macromodeling of reconfigurable intelligent surface based on microwave network theory,

    Z. Zhang et al. , “Macromodeling of reconfigurable intelligent surface based on microwave network theory,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. , vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 8707–8717, 2022

    2022

  7. [7]

    Mutual coupling in RIS-aided communication: Model training and experimental validation,

    P. Zheng et al., “Mutual coupling in RIS-aided communication: Model training and experimental validation,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. , vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 17 174–17 188, 2024

    2024

  8. [8]

    Virtual VNA 2.0: Ambiguity-free scattering matrix estimation by terminating not-directly-accessible ports with tunable and coupled loads,

    P. del Hougne, “Virtual VNA 2.0: Ambiguity-free scattering matrix estimation by terminating not-directly-accessible ports with tunable and coupled loads,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. , 2025

    work page 2025

Show all 15 references
  1. [9]

    Virtual VNA 3.0: Unambiguous scattering matrix estimation for non-reciprocal systems by leveraging tunable and coupled loads,

    ——, “Virtual VNA 3.0: Unambiguous scattering matrix estimation for non-reciprocal systems by leveraging tunable and coupled loads,” arXiv:2503.07239, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Scalable multiport antenna array characterization with PCB-realized tunable load network providing additional “virtual

    J. Tapie and P. del Hougne, “Scalable multiport antenna array characterization with PCB-realized tunable load network providing additional “virtual” VNA ports,” IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. , 2025

    2025

  3. [11]

    Beyond-diagonal RIS prototype and performance evaluation,

    J. Tapie et al. , “Beyond-diagonal RIS prototype and performance evaluation,” arXiv:2505.13392, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Experimentally realized physical-model-based frugal wave control in metasurface-programmable complex media,

    J. Sol et al., “Experimentally realized physical-model-based frugal wave control in metasurface-programmable complex media,” Nat. Commun. , vol. 15, no. 1, p. 2841, 2024. 6

    2024

  5. [13]

    A physics-compliant diagonal representation for wireless channels parametrized by beyond-diagonal reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,

    P. del Hougne, “A physics-compliant diagonal representation for wireless channels parametrized by beyond-diagonal reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. , 2025

    2025

  6. [14]

    Optimal blind focusing on perturbation-inducing targets in sub-unitary complex media,

    J. Sol et al., “Optimal blind focusing on perturbation-inducing targets in sub-unitary complex media,” Laser Photonics Rev., p. 2400619, 2024

    2024

  7. [15]

    Efficient computation of physics- compliant channel realizations for (rich-scattering) RIS-parametrized radio environments,

    H. Prod’homme and P. del Hougne, “Efficient computation of physics- compliant channel realizations for (rich-scattering) RIS-parametrized radio environments,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 3375– 3379, 2023

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.