Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 73 references

Investigating Magnetic Field Fluctuations in Jovian Auroral Electron Beams

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Small magnetic fluctuations seen over Jupiter's main aurora carry enough energy to power it

desk verdict The joint survey's detection of small-scale magnetic fluctuations over Jupiter's main aurora is plausible and new, but the printed energy-flux formula is inverted and the Alfvén speed is unverified, so the quantitative 'dominant' claim does not hold as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.02174 v1 pith:JJ475COX submitted 2025-07-02 astro-ph.EP physics.space-ph

A. Salveter , J. Saur , G. Clark , A. Sulaiman , B. H. Mauk , J. E. P. Connerney , B. Bonfond This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EPphysics.space-ph
keywords JupiterauroraAlfvénwaveswave-particleinteractionJunomagnetometermagneticfieldfluctuationsbroadbandelectrondistributionsPoyntingfluxauroralacceleration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks what mechanism accelerates the electrons that create Jupiter's main auroral arcs. It jointly analyzes magnetometer, energetic particle, and ultraviolet data from the first 20 Juno perijoves and finds that, whenever the magnetometer's digitization is fine enough to resolve them, small-scale ($2$–$10$ nT) magnetic field fluctuations with turbulent power-law spectra appear over the main emission field lines. These fluctuations carry projected energy fluxes of roughly $0.1$ to several W/m$^2$, enough to power the observed aurora. Because the accompanying electron distributions are mostly broadband and often bidirectional, the authors conclude that wave-particle interaction, rather than a static electric potential alone, can be the dominant acceleration process.

What carries the argument

The analysis depends on three pieces of machinery. First, the magnetometer's digitization floor: after subtracting the JRM33 and Con2020 model fields, residual magnetic field components are examined with continuous wavelet transforms whose power spectral densities are compared against the quantization noise $2\Delta B^2$; beyond about $4$ $R_J$ the floor drops from roughly $25$ nT to $0.1$ nT, which is what finally makes $2$–$10$ nT fluctuations visible. Second, a wavelet-based PSD with pre-whitening and post-darkening provides the frequency-resolved fluctuation amplitudes and the power-law slopes. Third, the energy flux at Jupiter is projected from the local fluctuation amplitude with the formula $F_E = (\delta B)^2/\mu_0 \cdot c\, B/B_m$, approximating the Alfvén speed as $c$.

What would settle it

Measure the electron density in situ along the same main-aurora crossings with the Juno Waves instrument and recompute the Poynting flux using the actual Alfvén speed rather than $c$, with a checked field-line mapping factor; if the projected fluxes fall below the roughly 100 mW/m$^2$ needed to sustain the observed UV emission, the energy claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Jupiter's main auroral acceleration is substantially stochastic. On every high-altitude crossing of main-emission field lines where the magnetometer resolution allows, the paper detects $2$–$10$ nT fluctuations with power spectral density slopes of $-1.7$ to $-2.2$ up to $2$ Hz, consistent with turbulence. Projecting these fluctuations to the ionosphere gives energy fluxes on the order of $0.1$ to several W/m$^2$. Combined with electron distributions that are predominantly broadband and often bidirectional over the same regions, the paper argues that Alfvénic wave-particle interaction is a dominant contributor to Jupiter's auroral processes, coexisting with the large-scale quasi-static field-aligned currents that produce the familiar unidirectional beams.

Load-bearing premise

The energy numbers assume magnetic disturbances race upward at the speed of light because the plasma density is taken from published values rather than measured at the spacecraft; if the real plasma is denser and the signals travel slower, the estimated power drops by the same factor.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The main aurora is powered at least in substantial part by stochastic Alfvénic acceleration rather than a single quasi-static potential.
  • The previously reported dominance of broadband electron distributions now has a physical counterpart: measurable alternating currents are present whenever the same field lines are crossed with adequate resolution.
  • Fluxes of order 0.1 to several W/m$^2$ are sufficient to explain the observed UV brightness, so no additional hidden acceleration mechanism is required.
  • The absence of small-scale fluctuations below 4 $R_J$ is at least partly a resolution effect, not necessarily an absence of wave activity, though auroral cavity density depletions may also suppress them.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same wavelet and digitization analysis applied to Juno's later perijoves, which sample different longitudes and local times, would test whether the fluctuations are truly omnipresent or organized by sector.
  • Folding in in-situ density measurements, replacing the speed-of-light Alfvén speed with a measured $v_A$ and rechecking the field-line mapping factor, will show whether the $0.1$–several W/m$^2$ estimate survives or needs downward revision.
  • Equivalent digitization-limited searches on other magnetometer-bearing spacecraft, such as future ice-giant missions, could reveal whether turbulent auroral powering is common to rapidly rotating magnetospheres.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents a joint statistical analysis of Juno MAG, JEDI, and UVS data from the first 20 perijoves, focusing on magnetic field fluctuations in Jupiter's diffuse and main auroral regions. The authors identify large-scale (DC) and small-scale (AC) perturbations, show that the magnetometer digitization floor prevents detection of small-scale fluctuations within 4 RJ, and report 2-10 nT fluctuations with power-law spectra (slopes approximately -1.7 to -2.2 up to 2 Hz) when the spacecraft crosses main auroral field lines beyond 4 RJ. They project these fluctuations to Poynting fluxes of 380-2370 mW/m2 at the ionosphere and conclude that wave-particle interaction can dominantly contribute to powering Jupiter's aurora.

Significance. The observational core is solid: the wavelet analysis is standard, the digitization-floor discussion is convincing, and the identification of small-scale fluctuations above 4 RJ with a well-characterized noise level is a useful contribution to the Juno literature. If the energy budget holds, the paper adds quantitative support to the stochastic Alfvénic acceleration scenario. However, the central quantitative claim currently rests on two unsupported or incorrect elements: the printed mapping formula is inverted, and the assumption v_A = c is not justified by in-situ density data. The paper also bases its 'always present' claim on only six intervals with no stated uncertainties on the spectral slopes. These are correctable, and the multi-instrument approach deserves credit for attempting a systematic comparison.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.4, equation for FE] Equation (FE = (δB)^2/μ0 · c · B/B_m) is inverted for the flux-tube mapping. With B the local field and B_m the ionospheric field, the mapped Poynting flux per unit ionospheric area is proportional to B_m/B (area ratio A/A_m = B_m/B), not B/B_m. At r ≈ 7 RJ, B/B_m ≈ 0.003, so the printed formula yields only ~10^-6 to 10^-5 W/m² rather than the quoted 380-2370 mW/m². The quoted numbers require the reciprocal ratio. This is a load-bearing error because the energy budget is the quantitative link between the observed fluctuations and the claim that wave-particle interaction can dominate auroral power.
  2. [Section 3.4, Alfvén speed assumption] The paper approximates v_A = c based on a citation to Bagenal et al. (2014) for auroral cavity densities, but no in-situ density measurement from Juno/Waves is presented for the six intervals analyzed. The Poynting flux scales linearly with v_A, so if the actual Alfvén speed is ~0.1-0.3 c, the projected fluxes drop by factors of 3-10, rendering the 'exceed 1000 mW/m2' statement unsupported. The authors should either use Juno/Waves electron density data for these intervals or provide a sensitivity analysis and temper the quantitative conclusion accordingly.
  3. [Section 3.4 and Figure 8] The claim that small-scale fluctuations are detected 'in all cases' where Juno crosses main auroral field lines beyond 4 RJ rests on only six distinct time intervals (as stated later in the same section), and the power-law fits have no reported uncertainties or goodness-of-fit statistics. The slopes are quoted variously as -1.7 to -2.2 (abstract) and 1.71 to 2.33 (Section 3.4), and the linear regressions in Figure 8 are not characterized. Without error bars or a larger sample, the conclusions that the fluctuations are 'omnipresent' and 'consistent with a turbulent spectrum' are overstated. Please add fit uncertainties and explicitly qualify the sample size in the abstract and conclusions.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Section 3.4] Typos: 'dominantely' should be 'dominantly', 'paragrah' should be 'paragraph', and the author affiliation 'atronomy' should be 'astronomy'.
  2. [Section 3.4] The text contains a duplicate phrase 'Power Spectral Density (Power Spectral Density)' and 'mW/m2 up into the range of mW/m2' should presumably read 'W/m2' for the upper range.
  3. [Section 2.5] The notation in the field-aligned current equation is confusing: δBφ is described as the latitudinal component, but Section 2.4 defines δBθ as latitudinal and δBφ as longitudinal; please check the labels.
  4. [Abstract versus Section 3.4] The abstract's slope range (-1.7 to -2.2) uses negative values while Section 3.4 reports positive magnitudes (1.71 to 2.33); please unify the sign convention to avoid confusion.
  5. [Figure 2 caption] The caption has a subject-verb agreement error ('wavelet spectrum ... are displayed') and 'Fifth Perijove' should be 'the fifth perijove'.
  6. [Section 2.4] The sentence 'The data is provided' should be 'The data are provided'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the joint MAG/JEDI/UVS observational chain is self-contained; the main caveats are quantitative assumptions, not circular reasoning.

full rationale

The paper's central detection—small-scale magnetic fluctuations above 4 R_J over the main emission with PSD slopes of about -1.7 to -2.2—is derived from MAG residuals, wavelet analysis, and digitization-level thresholds that do not presuppose the conclusion. The broadband/monoenergetic classification and zone definitions come from prior work, including the authors' Salveter et al. (2022), but they are independent statistical results on JEDI data, not constructed from the present energy-flux claim. The interpretation as Alfvenic turbulence and the 'dominant wave-particle interaction' conclusion cite the authors' earlier framework (Saur et al. 2018) together with external work (Lorch et al. 2022; Gershman et al. 2019; Lysak et al. 2021), so the inference is not forced by a self-citation chain. The genuine weaknesses are correctness risks, not circularity: Section 3.4 prints FE = (delta-B)^2/mu0 * c * B/B_m with B local and B_m the ionospheric field, yet the quoted 380-2370 mW/m2 from 2-5 nT at ~7 R_J are numerically unreachable with B/B_m << 1 and require B_m/B (flux-tube energy conservation). Also, v_A ~ c is assumed from Bagenal et al. (2014) rather than measured in situ; Poynting flux scales linearly with v_A. These issues make the energy budget unverified, but they do not make any equation equal to its input by construction. No step in the derivation reduces to a fit, a renamed known result, or a self-citation that substitutes for evidence.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard Juno analysis tools and publicly calibrated data. The main ad hoc elements are the hand-chosen L-shell boundaries and frequency bands; the v_A = c approximation is the most consequential unverified assumption.

free parameters (2)
  • L-shell zone boundaries for DifA, ZI, ZII = L = 10, 13, 16
    Used to assign in-situ observations to diffuse aurora, Zone I, and Zone II. The values are chosen by hand from previous perijove classifications (Mauk et al. 2020, Salveter et al. 2022) and the paper notes they are only rough references.
  • RMS frequency bands = 0.5 to 5 s, 8 to 20 s
    Wavelet power is averaged over hand-selected periods to report fluctuation amplitudes; the choice of bands affects the reported rms values.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption JRM33 + Con2020 models describe the background field; residuals are of physical origin.
    Section 2.4: all fluctuations are defined as residuals after subtracting these models; no independent check of the residual model error is given.
  • domain assumption Wilson et al. (2023) field-line mapping and the L-shell parameter locate the spacecraft footpoint on the auroral UV emission adequately.
    Section 2.2 and 3: the comparison of MAG/JEDI with UVS depends on this mapping; L-shell neglects the current sheet and the UVS images are 50-minute averages, so the association has timing and mapping uncertainty.
  • standard math FGM quantization noise is correctly described by PSDmin = 2 * dB^2.
    Section 2.6: used to determine which frequencies are resolvable; based on Bennett (1948) and Gray and Neuhoff (1998).
  • domain assumption The Alfven speed in the region of the fluctuations can be approximated by c.
    Section 3.4: the Poynting flux projection FE uses v_A = c; the paper cites Bagenal et al. (2014) but presents no density measurements from Juno/Waves to support this.
  • domain assumption Measured small-scale fluctuations are temporal wave activity rather than spatial structures crossed by the spacecraft.
    Section 2.6 and 3.4: single-spacecraft data cannot separate temporal and spatial variations; interpreted as turbulent wave spectra.
  • domain assumption The 50-minute UVS average is representative of the instantaneous auroral state at the crossing.
    Section 2.2: acknowledged timing uncertainty; the comparison throughout relies on this.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Investigating Magnetic Field Fluctuations in Jovian Auroral Electron Beams." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JJ475COX

@misc{pith2026250702174,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Investigating Magnetic Field Fluctuations in Jovian Auroral Electron Beams},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JJ475COX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.02174}
}
read the original abstract

The Juno spacecraft provides a unique opportunity to explore the mechanisms generating Jupiter's aurorae. Past analyses of Juno data immensely advanced our understanding of its auroral acceleration processes, however, few studies utilized multiple instruments on Juno in a joint systematic analysis. This study uses measurements from the Juno Ultraviolet Spectrograph (UVS), the Jupiter Energetic particle Detector Instrument (JEDI), and the Juno Magnetometer (MAG) from the first 20 perijoves. On magnetic field lines associated with the diffuse aurora, we consistently find small-scale magnetic field fluctuations with amplitudes of up to 100 nT on time scales of seconds to 1 minute. On magnetic field lines directly linked to the main emission, the electron distribution is field-aligned, mostly broad-band in energy, and accompanied by large-scale magnetic field perturbations of several 100 nT on time scales of tens of min (except one case). These large-scale perturbations are generally associated with quasistatic field-aligned electric currents. Small-scale magnetic fields are not resolved over the main emission zone closer than radial distances 4 Jovian radii due to the digitization limit of the magnetometer. However, in all cases where Juno crosses the main auroral field lines beyond 4RJ, the digitization limit is significantly reduced and we detect small-scale magnetic field fluctuations of 2 nT to 10 nT consistent with a turbulent spectrum. Associated energy fluxes projected to Jupiter can exceed 1000 mW/m2. The general broad-band nature of the electron distributions and the consistent presence of small-scale magnetic field fluctuations over the main emission support that wave-particle interaction can dominantely contribute to power Jupiter's auroral processes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.02174 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of the flight trajectory in panel C of the first perijove in the rotating frame of Jupiter, expressed by the SysIII coordinates. The perpendicular distance from the spin axis is calculated by ρ = p x2 + y 2. The spacecraft’s location is mapped onto the ionosphere and marked with red lines on the left and right sides of the UVS panels. The UVS images are shown for the northern hemisphere (A) on the left and … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Wavelet spectrum of the northern flyby of Fifth Perijove are displayed over a wide temporal range of more than six hours in part (A). All the different digitization levels are visi￾ble. (B) Time-averaged Power Spectral Densities (PSD) during selected time intervals, with the dashed lines indicating the corresponding digitization levels. –10– [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The minimum resolvable Power Spectral Density P SDmin is analyzed for each digitization level (panel A), demonstrating its correlation with the total magnetic field strength (panel B) and the radial distance to Jupiter (panel C). The orange slopes in panels A and B indi￾cate the expected minimum resolvable Power Spectral Density P SDmin for the digitization level ∆B and the total magnetic field strength |B|, respect… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The Figure illustrates the data coverage in SysIII coordinates, where the line plots outline the paths observed in the initial 20 perijoves. ρ represents the distance perpendicular and z represents the distance along the axis aligned with magnetic dipole. The circular …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Overview of the instrument data from Perijove 14, which crossed the northern hemisphere at altitudes lower than 1 RJ. Panel (A) displays the L-shell value color-coded in red, blue, and orange, representing the three anticipated auroral regions: ZII, ZI, and DifA from (…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: This figure gives an overview of the instrument data from perijove 3 over the south￾ern hemisphere passing at altitudes lower than 1 RJ. Further details for each panel are similar to those provided in the caption of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: This figure gives an overview of the magnetic field, energetic electrons, and UV emission data from Perijove 5, which passed through the northern hemisphere at altitudes higher than 1 RJ. Further details of each panel are provided in the caption of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:fi…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Six distinct time spans at high radial between 6 RJ to 7.5 RJ distances crossing the main emission zone. The power spectra of magnetic field fluctuations measured during these time periods are shown, each providing evidence for small-scale fluctuations up to the highes…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    APACrefauthors \ 1981 Jun 01

    Akasofu1981 APACrefauthors Akasofu, S I. APACrefauthors \ 1981 Jun 01 . Energy coupling between the solar wind and the magnetosphere Energy coupling between the solar wind and the magnetosphere . Space Science Reviews 28 2 121-190 . APACrefURL https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00218810 APACrefURL APACrefDOI doi:10.1007/BF00218810 APACrefDOI

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00218810 1981

  2. [2]

    , Bagenal, F

    Allegrini2017 APACrefauthors Allegrini, F. , Bagenal, F. , Bolton, S. , Connerney, J E P. , Clark, G. , Ebert, R. Zink, J. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . Electron beams and loss cones in the auroral regions of Jupiter Electron beams and loss cones in the auroral regions of jupiter . Geophysical Research Letters 44 7131--7139 . APACrefURL https://www.semanticscho...

    doi:10.1002/2017gl073180 2017

  3. [4]

    , Adriani, A

    Bagenal2017 APACrefauthors Bagenal, F. , Adriani, A. , Allegrini, F. , Bolton, S J. , Bonfond, B. , Bunce, E J. Zarka, P. APACrefauthors \ 2017 01 . Magnetospheric Science Objectives of the Juno Mission Magnetospheric science objectives of the juno mission . Space Science Reviews 213 1 219--287 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1007/s11214-014-0036-8 APACrefDOI

    doi:10.1007/s11214-014-0036-8 2017

  4. [5]

    , Pulkkinen, T I

    Baker1996 APACrefauthors Baker, D N. , Pulkkinen, T I. , Angelopoulos, V. , Baumjohann, W. \ McPherron, R L. APACrefauthors \ 1996 . Neutral line model of substorms: Past results and present view Neutral line model of substorms: Past results and present view . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 101 A6 12975-13010 . APACrefDOI doi:https://doi.o...

    work page doi:10.1029/95ja03753 1996

  5. [6]

    APACrefauthors \ 1948

    Bennett1948 APACrefauthors Bennett, W R. APACrefauthors \ 1948 . Spectra of quantized signals Spectra of quantized signals . The Bell System Technical Journal 27 3 446-472 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01340.x APACrefDOI

    arXiv 1948

  6. [7]

    , Chen, J

    Bieber1993 APACrefauthors Bieber, J W. , Chen, J. , Matthaeus, W H. , Smith, C W. \ Pomerantz, M A. APACrefauthors \ 1993 . Long-term variations of interplanetary magnetic field spectra with implications for cosmic ray modulation Long-term variations of interplanetary magnetic field spectra with implications for cosmic ray modulation . Journal of Geophysi...

    work page doi:10.1029/92ja02566 1993

  7. [8]

    , Yao, Z

    Bonfond2020 APACrefauthors Bonfond, B. , Yao, Z. \ Grodent, D. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Six Pieces of Evidence Against the Corotation Enforcement Theory to Explain the Main Aurora at Jupiter Six pieces of evidence against the corotation enforcement theory to explain the main aurora at jupiter . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 125 11 e2020JA0...

    doi:10.1029/2020ja028152 2020

  8. [9]

    , Yao, Z H

    Bonfond2021 APACrefauthors Bonfond, B. , Yao, Z H. , Gladstone, G R. , Grodent, D. , Gérard, J C. , Matar, J. Bolton, S J. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Are Dawn Storms Jupiter's Auroral Substorms? Are dawn storms jupiter's auroral substorms? AGU Advances 2 1 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/2020AV000275 APACrefDOI

    work page doi:10.1029/2020av000275 2021

Show all 73 references
  1. [10]

    , Belton, M J S

    Broadfoot1979 APACrefauthors Broadfoot, A L. , Belton, M J S. , Takacs, P Z. , Sandel, B R. , Shemansky, D E. , Holberg, J B. McElroy, M B. APACrefauthors \ 1979 . Extreme Ultraviolet Observations from Voyager 1 Encounter with Jupiter Extreme ultraviolet observations from voya...

    1979 doi

  2. [11]

    , Mauk, B H

    Clark2017 APACrefauthors Clark, G. , Mauk, B H. , Haggerty, D. , Paranicas, C. , Kollmann, P. , Rymer, A. Valek, P. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . Energetic particle signatures of magnetic field‐aligned potentials over Jupiter's polar regions Energetic particle signatures of magnetic...

    2017

  3. [12]

    APACrefauthors \ 2017

    System2022 APACrefauthors Connerney, J E P. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . Juno fluxgate magnetometer calibrated data v1.0 [Data set]. Juno fluxgate magnetometer calibrated data v1.0 [data set]. APACrefDOI doi:10.17189/1519711 APACrefDOI

    2017 doi

  4. [13]

    , Benn, M

    Connerney2017a APACrefauthors Connerney, J E P. , Benn, M. , Bjarnø, J B. , Denver, T. , Espley, J. , Jørgensen, J. Smith, E. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . The Juno Magnetic Field Investigation The juno magnetic field investigation . Space Science Reviews 213 1-4 39--138 . APACrefUR...

    2017 doi

  5. [14]

    , Timmins, S

    Connerney2020 APACrefauthors Connerney, J E P. , Timmins, S. , Herceg, M. \ Joergensen, J L. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . A Jovian Magnetodisc Model for the Juno Era A jovian magnetodisc model for the juno era . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 125 10 . APACrefDOI doi...

    2020 doi

  6. [15]

    , Timmins, S

    Connerney2022 APACrefauthors Connerney, J E P. , Timmins, S. , Oliversen, R J. , Espley, J R. , Joergensen, J L. , Kotsiaros, S. Levin, S M. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . A New Model of Jupiter's Magnetic Field at the Completion of Juno's Prime Mission A new model of jupiter's magne...

    2022 doi

  7. [16]

    \ Bunce, E

    Cowley2001 APACrefauthors Cowley, S. \ Bunce, E. APACrefauthors \ 2001 . Origin of the main auroral oval in Jupiter's coupled magnetosphere–ionosphere system Origin of the main auroral oval in jupiter's coupled magnetosphere–ionosphere system . Planetary and Space Science 49 1...

    2001 doi

  8. [17]

    , Delamere, P A

    Damiano2023 APACrefauthors Damiano, P A. , Delamere, P A. , Kim, E H. , Johnson, J R. \ Ng, C S. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . Electron Energization by Inertial Alfvén Waves in Density Depleted Flux Tubes at Jupiter Electron energization by inertial alfvén waves in density depleted ...

    2023 doi

  9. [18]

    , Delamere, P A

    Damiano2019 APACrefauthors Damiano, P A. , Delamere, P A. , Stauffer, B. , Ng, C S. \ Johnson, J R. APACrefauthors \ 2019 03 . Kinetic Simulations of Electron Acceleration by Dispersive Scale Alfv \' e n Waves in Jupiter s Magnetosphere Kinetic simulations of electron accelera...

    2019 doi

  10. [19]

    , Allegrini, F

    Ebert2017 APACrefauthors Ebert, R. , Allegrini, F. , Bagenal, F. , Bolton, S. , Connerney, J E P. , Clark, G. Wilson, R. APACrefauthors \ 2017 09 . Spatial Distribution and Properties of 0.1–100 keV Electrons in Jupiter's Polar Auroral Region Spatial distribution and propertie...

    2017

  11. [20]

    , Gurnett, D

    Elliott2018 APACrefauthors Elliott, S. , Gurnett, D. , Kurth, W. , Clark, G. , Mauk, B H. , Bolton, S. Levin, S. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . Pitch Angle Scattering of Upgoing Electron Beams in Jupiter's Polar Regions by Whistler Mode Waves Pitch angle scattering of upgoing electro...

    2018

  12. [21]

    , Gurnett, D

    Elliott2020 APACrefauthors Elliott, S. , Gurnett, D. , Yoon, P H. , Kurth, W. , Mauk, B H. , Ebert, R. Sulaiman, A H. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . The Generation of Upward‐Propagating Whistler Mode Waves by Electron Beams in the Jovian Polar Regions The generation of upward‐propaga...

    2020

  13. [22]

    , Sulaiman, A

    Elliott2021 APACrefauthors Elliott, S. , Sulaiman, A. , Kurth, W. , Faden, J. , Allegrini, F. , Valek, P. Bolton, S. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . The High‐Latitude Extension of Jupiter's Io Torus: Electron Densities Measured by Juno Waves The high‐latitude extension of jupiter's io...

    2021

  14. [23]

    , Connerney, J E P

    Gershman2019 APACrefauthors Gershman, D J. , Connerney, J E P. , Kotsiaros, S. , DiBraccio, G A. , Martos, Y M. , Viñas, A F. Bolton, S J. APACrefauthors \ 2019 07 . Alfvénic Fluctuations Associated With Jupiter's Auroral Emissions Alfvénic fluctuations associated with jupiter...

    2019 doi

  15. [24]

    , Persyn, S C

    UVdata APACrefauthors Gladstone, G R. , Persyn, S C. , Eterno, J S. , Walther, B C. , Slater, D C. , Davis, M W. Denis, F. APACrefauthors \ 2017 11 . The ultraviolet spectrograph on NASA's Juno mission The ultraviolet spectrograph on NASA's juno mission . Space Sci. Rev. 213 1...

    2017

  16. [25]

    , Versteeg, M H

    Gladstone2017 APACrefauthors Gladstone, G R. , Versteeg, M H. , Greathouse, T K. , Hue, V. , Davis, M W. , G \' e rard, J C. Bagenal, F. APACrefauthors \ 2017 08 . Juno- UVS approach observations of Jupiter s auroras Juno- UVS approach observations of jupiter s auroras . Geoph...

    2017 doi

  17. [26]

    \ Neuhoff, D

    Gray1998 APACrefauthors Gray, R. \ Neuhoff, D. APACrefauthors \ 1998 . Quantization Quantization . IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 44 6 2325-2383 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1109/18.720541 APACrefDOI

    1998 doi

  18. [27]

    , Clarke, J H

    Grodent2003 APACrefauthors Grodent, J T. , Clarke, J H. , Waite, S W H. , Cowley, J C. \ G\' e rard, J K. APACrefauthors \ 2003 . Jupiter's polar auroral emissions Jupiter's polar auroral emissions . Journal of Geophysical Research

    2003

  19. [28]

    , Bonfond, B

    Groulard2024 APACrefauthors Groulard, A. , Bonfond, B. , Grodent, D. , Gérard, J C. , Greathouse, T. , Hue, V. Versteeg, M. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Dawn-dusk asymmetry in the main auroral emissions at Jupiter observed with Juno-UVS Dawn-dusk asymmetry in the main auroral emiss...

    2024

  20. [29]

    , Bonfond, B

    Gerard2019 APACrefauthors Gérard, J. , Bonfond, B. , Mauk, B H. , Gladstone, G. , Yao, Z. , Greathouse, T. Levin, S. APACrefauthors \ 2019 11 . Contemporaneous Observations of Jovian Energetic Auroral Electrons and Ultraviolet Emissions by the Juno Spacecraft Contemporaneous o...

    2019

  21. [30]

    , Bonfond, B

    Haewsantati2023 APACrefauthors Haewsantati, K. , Bonfond, B. , Wannawichian, S. , Gladstone, R. , Hue, V. , Greathouse, T. G´erard, J C M C. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . Juno's Multi‐Instruments Observations During the Flybys of Auroral Bright Spots in Jupiter's Polar Aurorae Juno'...

    2023 doi

  22. [31]

    Head2024 APACrefauthors Head, L. A. , Grodent, D. , Bonfond, B. , Moirano, A. , Benmahi, B. , Sicorello, G. Yao, Z. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Effect of magnetospheric conditions on the morphology of Jupiter’s ultraviolet main auroral emission as observed by Juno-UVS Effect of ma...

    2024 doi

  23. [32]

    APACrefauthors \ 1979

    Hill1979 APACrefauthors Hill, T. APACrefauthors \ 1979 . Inertial limit on corotation Inertial limit on corotation . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 84 A11 6554--6558 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/JA084iA11p06554 APACrefDOI

    1979 doi

  24. [33]

    APACrefauthors \ 2001

    Hill2001 APACrefauthors Hill, T W. APACrefauthors \ 2001 . The Jovian auroral oval The jovian auroral oval . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 106 A5 8101--8107 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/2000JA000302 APACrefDOI

    2001 doi

  25. [34]

    APACrefauthors \ 2024

    Kaminker2024 APACrefauthors Kaminker, V. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Examination of Magnetic Field Signatures and Local Plasma Distribution Variations in Jupiter's Magnetosphere Examination of magnetic field signatures and local plasma distribution variations in jupiter's magnetos...

    2024 doi

  26. [35]

    APACrefauthors \ 2005 01 01

    Kivelson2005 APACrefauthors Kivelson, M G. APACrefauthors \ 2005 01 01 . The Current Systems of the Jovian Magnetosphere and Ionosphere and Predictions for Saturn The current systems of the jovian magnetosphere and ionosphere and predictions for saturn . Space Science Reviews ...

    2005 doi

  27. [36]

    APACrefauthors \ 1973

    Knight1973 APACrefauthors Knight, S. APACrefauthors \ 1973 . Parallel electric fields Parallel electric fields . Planetary and Space Science 21 5 741--750 . APACrefURL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0032063373900937 APACrefURL APACrefDOI doi:10.1016/0032-063...

    1973

  28. [37]

    , Connerney, J E P

    Kotsiaros2019 APACrefauthors Kotsiaros, S. , Connerney, J E P. , Clark, G. , Allegrini, F. , Gladstone, G. , Kurth, W. Levin, S. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Birkeland currents in Jupiter’s magnetosphere observed by the polar-orbiting Juno spacecraft Birkeland currents in jupiter’s...

    2019 doi

  29. [38]

    , Connerney, J E P

    Kotsiaros2020 APACrefauthors Kotsiaros, S. , Connerney, J E P. \ Martos, Y M. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Analysis of Eddy Current Generation on the Juno Spacecraft in Jupiter's Magnetosphere Analysis of eddy current generation on the juno spacecraft in jupiter's magnetosphere . E...

    2020 doi

  30. [39]

    , Hospodarsky, G B

    Kurth2017 APACrefauthors Kurth, W S. , Hospodarsky, G B. , Kirchner, D L. , Mokrzycki, B T. , Averkamp, T F. , Robison, W T. Zarka, P. APACrefauthors \ 2017 07 . The Juno Waves Investigation The juno waves investigation . Space Science Reviews 213 1-4 347--392 . APACrefDOI doi...

    2017 doi

  31. [40]

    , Ray, L C

    Lorch2022 APACrefauthors Lorch, C T S. , Ray, L C. , Wilson, R J. , Bagenal, F. , Crary, F. , Delamere, P A. Allegrini, F. APACrefauthors \ 2022 05 . Evidence of Alfvénic Activity in Jupiter's Mid-To-High Latitude Magnetosphere Evidence of alfvénic activity in jupiter's mid-to...

    2022 doi

  32. [41]

    , Warnecke, J

    Luhr1996 APACrefauthors Luhr, H. , Warnecke, J. \ Rother, M. APACrefauthors \ 1996 . An algorithm for estimating field-aligned currents from single spacecraft magnetic field measurements: a diagnostic tool applied to Freja satellite data An algorithm for estimating field-align...

    1996 doi

  33. [42]

    \ Lotko, W

    Lysak1996 APACrefauthors Lysak, R L. \ Lotko, W. APACrefauthors \ 1996 . On the kinetic dispersion relation for shear Alfvén waves On the kinetic dispersion relation for shear alfvén waves . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 101 A3 5085-5094 . APACrefDOI doi:https...

    1996 doi

  34. [43]

    \ Song, Y

    Lysak2020 APACrefauthors Lysak, R L. \ Song, Y. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Field Line Resonances in Jupiter's Magnetosphere Field line resonances in jupiter's magnetosphere . Geophysical Research Letters 47 18 e2020GL089473 . APACrefURL https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi...

    2020 doi

  35. [44]

    , Song, Y

    Lysak2021 APACrefauthors Lysak, R L. , Song, Y. , Elliott, S. , Kurth, W. , Sulaiman, A H. \ Gershman, D. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . The Jovian Ionospheric Alfv\' e n Resonator and Auroral Particle Acceleration The jovian ionospheric alfv\' e n resonator and auroral particle acce...

    2021 doi

  36. [45]

    , Sergis, N

    Masters2022 APACrefauthors Masters, A. , Sergis, N. , Sulaiman, A H. , Palmaerts, B. \ Hunt, G J. APACrefauthors \ 2022 11 . Near-Magnetic-Field-Aligned Energetic Electrons Above Saturn s Dark Polar Regions Near-magnetic-field-aligned energetic electrons above saturn s dark po...

    2022 doi

  37. [46]

    APACrefauthors \ 2013 08

    Mauk2013 APACrefauthors Mauk, B H. APACrefauthors \ 2013 08 . Analysis of EMIC -wave-moderated flux limitation of measured energetic ion spectra in multispecies magnetospheric plasmas Analysis of EMIC -wave-moderated flux limitation of measured energetic ion spectra in multisp...

    2013 doi

  38. [47]

    APACrefauthors \ 2020

    JEDIdata APACrefauthors Mauk, B H. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . JUNO JEDI JUPITER STANDARD CALIBRATED PRODUCTS (JNO J JED 3 CDR V1.0). Juno jedi jupiter standard calibrated products (jno j jed 3 cdr v1.0). APACrefDOI doi:10.17189/1519713 APACrefDOI

    2020 doi

  39. [48]

    , Allegrini, F

    Mauk2022 APACrefauthors Mauk, B H. , Allegrini, F. , Bagenal, F. , Bolton, S. , Clark, G. , Connerney, J E P. Sulaiman, A. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . Loss of Energetic Ions Comprising the Ring Current Populations of Jupiter's Middle and Inner Magnetosphere Loss of energetic ions ...

    2022

  40. [49]

    , Clark, G

    Mauk2020 APACrefauthors Mauk, B H. , Clark, G. , Gladstone, G. , Kotsiaros, S. , Adriani, A. , Allegrini, F. Rymer, A. APACrefauthors \ 2020 03 . Energetic Particles and Acceleration Regions Over Jupiter's Polar Cap and Main Aurora: A Broad Overview Energetic particles and acc...

    2020

  41. [50]

    , Haggerty, D

    Mauk2017b APACrefauthors Mauk, B H. , Haggerty, D. , Paranicas, C. , Clark, G. , Kollmann, P. , Rymer, A. Valek, P. APACrefauthors \ 2017 09 . Discrete and broadband electron acceleration in Jupiter’s powerful aurora Discrete and broadband electron acceleration in jupiter’s po...

    2017 doi

  42. [51]

    , Haggerty, D

    Mauk2018 APACrefauthors Mauk, B H. , Haggerty, D. , Paranicas, C. , Clark, G. , Kollmann, P. , Rymer, A. Valek, P. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . Diverse Electron and Ion Acceleration Characteristics Observed Over Jupiter's Main Aurora Diverse electron and ion acceleration characteri...

    2018 doi

  43. [52]

    , Haggerty, D K

    Mauk2017 APACrefauthors Mauk, B H. , Haggerty, D K. , Jaskulek, S. , Schlemm, C. , Brown, L. , Cooper, S. Stokes, M. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . The Jupiter Energetic Particle Detector Instrument (JEDI) Investigation for the Juno Mission The jupiter energetic particle detector ins...

    2017 doi

  44. [53]

    \ Saur, J

    Mauk2007 APACrefauthors Mauk, B H. \ Saur, J. APACrefauthors \ 2007 . Equatorial electron beams and auroral structuring at Jupiter Equatorial electron beams and auroral structuring at jupiter . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 112 A10 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/200...

    2007 doi

  45. [54]

    , Sotirelis, T

    Newell2009 APACrefauthors Newell, P T. , Sotirelis, T. \ Wing, S. APACrefauthors \ 2009 . Diffuse, monoenergetic, and broadband aurora: The global precipitation budget Diffuse, monoenergetic, and broadband aurora: The global precipitation budget . Journal of Geophysical Resear...

    2009 doi

  46. [55]

    , Delamere, P A

    Ng2018 APACrefauthors Ng, C S. , Delamere, P A. , Kaminker, V. \ Damiano, P A. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . Radial Transport and Plasma Heating in Jupiter's Magnetodisc Radial transport and plasma heating in jupiter's magnetodisc . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 123...

    2018 doi

  47. [56]

    \ Cowley, S W H

    Nichols2004 APACrefauthors Nichols, J D. \ Cowley, S W H. APACrefauthors \ 2004 . Magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling currents in Jupiter's middle magnetosphere: effect of precipitation-induced enhancement of the ionospheric Pedersen conductivity Magnetosphere-ionosphere couplin...

    2004

  48. [57]

    , Mauk, B H

    Paranicas2018 APACrefauthors Paranicas, C. , Mauk, B H. , Haggerty, D. , Clark, G. , Kollmann, P. , Rymer, A. Bolton, S. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . Intervals of Intense Energetic Electron Beams Over Jupiter's Poles Intervals of intense energetic electron beams over jupiter's pole...

    2018 doi

  49. [58]

    \ Daly , P W

    Paschmann1998 APACrefauthors Paschmann , G. \ Daly , P W. APACrefauthors \ 1998 01 . Analysis Methods for Multi-Spacecraft Data. ISSI Scientific Reports Series SR-001, ESA/ISSI, Vol. 1. ISBN 1608-280X, 1998 Analysis Methods for Multi-Spacecraft Data. ISSI Scientific Reports Se...

    1998

  50. [59]

    , Ergun, R E

    Ray2010 APACrefauthors Ray, L C. , Ergun, R E. , Delamere, P A. \ Bagenal, F. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . Magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling at Jupiter: Effect of field-aligned potentials on angular momentum transport Magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling at jupiter: Effect of field-al...

    2010 doi

  51. [60]

    , Saur, J

    Salveter2022 APACrefauthors Salveter, A. , Saur, J. , Clark, G. \ Mauk, B H. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . Jovian Auroral Electron Precipitation Budget—A Statistical Analysis of Diffuse, Mono‐Energetic, and Broadband Auroral Electron Distributions Jovian auroral electron precipitati...

    2022

  52. [61]

    APACrefauthors \ 2004 02

    Saur2004 APACrefauthors Saur, J. APACrefauthors \ 2004 02 . Turbulent Heating of Jupiter's Middle Magnetosphere Turbulent heating of jupiter's middle magnetosphere . The Astrophysical Journal 602 2 L137--L140 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1086/382588 APACrefDOI

    2004 doi

  53. [62]

    , Janser, S

    Saur2018 APACrefauthors Saur, J. , Janser, S. , Schreiner, A. , Clark, G. , Mauk, B H. , Kollmann, P. Kotsiaros, S. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . Wave‐Particle Interaction of Alfvén Waves in Jupiter's Magnetosphere: Auroral and Magnetospheric Particle Acceleration Wave‐particle inte...

    2018

  54. [63]

    , Mauk, B H

    Saur2006 APACrefauthors Saur, J. , Mauk, B H. , Mitchell, D G. , Krupp, N. , Khurana, K K. , Livi, S. Dougherty, M K. APACrefauthors \ 2006 02 01 . Anti-planetward auroral electron beams at Saturn Anti-planetward auroral electron beams at saturn . Nature 439 7077 699--702 . AP...

    2006 doi

  55. [64]

    , Politano, H

    Saur2002 APACrefauthors Saur, J. , Politano, H. , Pouquet, A. \ Matthaeus, W H. APACrefauthors \ 2002 . Evidence for weak MHD turbulence in the middle magnetosphere of Jupiter Evidence for weak mhd turbulence in the middle magnetosphere of jupiter . A&A 386 2 699--708 . APACre...

    2002 doi

  56. [65]

    , Pouquet, A

    Saur2003 APACrefauthors Saur, J. , Pouquet, A. \ Matthaeus, W H. APACrefauthors \ 2003 . An acceleration mechanism for the generation of the main auroral oval on Jupiter An acceleration mechanism for the generation of the main auroral oval on jupiter . Geophysical Research Let...

    2003 doi

  57. [66]

    , Allegrini, F

    Sulaiman2022 APACrefauthors Sulaiman, A H. , Allegrini, F. , Clark, G. , Gladstone, R. , Kotsiaros, S. , Kurth, W S. Bolton, S. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . Jupiter's Low‐Altitude Auroral Zones: Fields, Particles, Plasma Waves, and Density Depletions Jupiter's low‐altitude auroral ...

    2022

  58. [67]

    , Hospodarsky, G

    Sulaiman2020 APACrefauthors Sulaiman, A H. , Hospodarsky, G. , Elliott, S. , Kurth, W S. , Gurnett, D. , Imai, M. Bolton, S. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Wave‐Particle Interactions Associated With Io's Auroral Footprint: Evidence of Alfvén, Ion Cyclotron, and Whistler Modes Wave‐pa...

    2020

  59. [68]

    , Allegrini, F

    Szalay2017 APACrefauthors Szalay, J. , Allegrini, F. , Bagenal, F. , Bolton, S. , Clark, G. , Connerney, J E P. Wilson, R. APACrefauthors \ 2017 07 . Plasma measurements in the Jovian polar region with Juno/JADE Plasma measurements in the jovian polar region with juno/jade . G...

    2017 doi

  60. [69]

    , Kimura, T

    Tao2015 APACrefauthors Tao, C. , Kimura, T. , Badman, S V. , André, N. , Tsuchiya, F. , Murakami, G. Fujimoto, M. APACrefauthors \ 2015 . Variation of Jupiter's aurora observed by Hisaki/EXCEED: 2. Estimations of auroral parameters and magnetospheric dynamics Variation of jupi...

    2015 doi

  61. [70]

    , Thorne, R M

    Tao2011 APACrefauthors Tao, X. , Thorne, R M. , Horne, R B. , Ni, B. , Menietti, J D. , Shprits, Y Y. \ Gurnett, D A. APACrefauthors \ 2011 . Importance of plasma injection events for energization of relativistic electrons in the Jovian magnetosphere Importance of plasma injec...

    2011 doi

  62. [71]

    , Bagenal, F

    Thomas2004 APACrefauthors Thomas, N. , Bagenal, F. , Hill, T. \ Wilson, J. APACrefauthors \ 2004 01 . The Io Neutral Clouds and Plasma Torus The io neutral clouds and plasma torus . Jupiter. The Planet, Satellites and Magnetosphere -1 561--591

    2004

  63. [72]

    \ Compo, G P

    Torrence1998 APACrefauthors Torrence, C. \ Compo, G P. APACrefauthors \ 1998 . A Practical Guide to Wavelet Analysis A practical guide to wavelet analysis . Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 79 1 61--78 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0061:APGTWA>2.0....

    1998 doi

  64. [73]

    APACrefauthors \ 2014

    UVSdata APACrefauthors Trantham, B. APACrefauthors \ 2014 . Juno Jupiter UVS Calibrated Data Archive V1.0. Juno jupiter UVS calibrated data archive v1.0. NASA Planetary Data System

    2014

  65. [74]

    , Vogt, M F

    Wilson2023 APACrefauthors Wilson, R J. , Vogt, M F. , Provan, G. , Kamran, A. , James, M K. , Brennan, M. \ Cowley, S W H. APACrefauthors \ 2023 02 13 . Internal and External Jovian Magnetic Fields: Community Code to Serve the Magnetospheres of the Outer Planets Community Inte...

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.