Pith. sign in

REVIEW

ARMOUR US: Android Runtime Zero-permission Sensor Usage Monitoring from User Space

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2507.02177 v1 pith:ZIH6FWTA submitted 2025-07-02 cs.CR

ARMOUR US: Android Runtime Zero-permission Sensor Usage Monitoring from User Space

classification cs.CR
keywords sensorandroiddatazero-permissionanalysisarmoursensorsaccess
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

This work investigates how to monitor access to Android zero-permission sensors which could cause privacy leakage to users. Moreover, monitoring such sensitive access allows security researchers to characterize potential sensor abuse patterns. Zero-permission sensors such as accelerometers have become an indispensable part of Android devices. The critical information they provide has attracted extensive research investigating how data collectors could capture more sensor data to enable both benign and exploitative applications. In contrast, little work has explored how to enable data providers, such as end users, to understand sensor usage. While existing methods such as static analysis and hooking-based dynamic analysis face challenges of requiring complicated development chains, rooting privilege, and app-specific reverse engineering analysis, our work aims to bridge this gap by developing ARMOUR for user-space runtime monitoring, leveraging the intrinsic sampling rate variation and convergence behaviors of Android. ARMOUR enables privacy-aware users to easily monitor how third-party apps use sensor data and support security researchers to perform rapid app-agnostic sensor access analysis. Our evaluation with 1,448 commercial applications shows the effectiveness of ARMOUR in detecting sensor usage in obfuscated code and other conditions, and observes salient sensor abuse patterns such as 50% of apps from seemingly sensor-independent categories accessing data of multiple zero-permission sensors. We analyze the impact of Android's recent policy changes on zero-permission sensors and remaining technical and regulatory problems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.