Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Building SPARCS, an Ultraviolet Science CubeSat for Exoplanet Habitability Studies, Technology Advancements, and Mission Training

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read SPARCS is designed to watch about 20 K and M stars for weeks each in two ultraviolet bands at once, boosting cumulative UV exposure time on low-mass stars by roughly a thousandfold and recovering more than 95 percent of the most energetic…

desk verdict Candid status paper with real engineering value, but the once-per-year flare claim outruns the target statistics and read-noise-limited sensitivity. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.03102 v1 pith:TMESDZ6S submitted 2025-07-03 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.EP

classification astro-ph.IMastro-ph.EP
keywords ultravioletastronomylow-massstarsstellarflaresexoplanethabitabilityCubeSatflarefrequencydistributionsdelta-dopedCCDUVbandpassfilters
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

SPARCS is a small ultraviolet observatory built to answer a specific question: how much high-energy ultraviolet radiation do low-mass stars pour onto their planets over months and years, not just over hours? The paper argues that by staring at about 20 K and M stars continuously for 5 to 40 days each in two ultraviolet bands at once, the mission will increase the cumulative ultraviolet exposure time on such stars by roughly a factor of 1000 relative to archival Hubble and GALEX observations. That long stare is what lets it catch rare, high-energy flares whose energies exceed $10^{31}\,\mathrm{erg}$, recovering more than 95 percent of them, and to extend flare frequency distributions from once-per-day events to once-per-month and once-per-year events. The same data will measure the FUV-to-NUV color of flares and the rotationally modulated quiescent variability, quantities that feed models of exoplanet atmospheric loss and habitability. The paper also claims the mission is retiring technology risk for future ultraviolet missions by flying delta-doped detectors with near-100 percent internal quantum efficiency and detector-integrated metal-dielectric bandpass filters.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the SPARCam camera: a 9-cm telescope with a dichroic beam splitter feeding two delta-doped CCD detectors, one for the far-UV and one for the near-UV, each with a detector-integrated bandpass filter. $\Delta$ doping places a single highly doped atomic layer on the back surface to bring internal quantum efficiency near 100 percent; the metal-dielectric filters suppress red leak by $10^{-3}$ to $10^{-4}$, which matters because the target stars are far brighter at red wavelengths than in the UV. Around this hardware, the enabling mechanism is stare duration: continuous 5-to-40-day monitoring in both bands, managed by an autonomous onboard exposure-control system that shortens exposures when a flare brightens the target, so both quiescent and flare phases are captured without saturating the detector.

What would settle it

After the first year of operations, count the flares with energy above $10^{31}\,\mathrm{erg}$ detected across all targets and compare the cumulative rate per star-day with the prediction drawn from the Hubble flare distributions. If the observed rate falls far below the predicted rate, or if the energy distribution visibly flattens before $10^{31}\,\mathrm{erg}$, the central flare-statistics claim is falsified; a null detection of such flares across the full target list would settle it even more directly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, SPARCS' central scientific claim is that a single CubeSat can produce the first long-baseline, time-resolved record of ultraviolet radiation from low-mass stars. By observing roughly 20 targets spanning ages from young moving groups to old field stars, each for one to three full rotation periods, it will measure both quiescent flux levels modulated by starspots and flares, and combine the two into flare frequency distributions that reach energies and timescales inaccessible to past ultraviolet missions. The paper asserts that simulated light curves built from Hubble-derived flare statistics show the instrument will recover more than 95 percent of flares with energies larger than $10^{31}\,\mathrm{erg}$, and that the resulting distributions will extend knowledge of flare rates from daily events to monthly and yearly events. It further claims that simultaneous far-UV ($153$--$171$ nm) and near-UV ($260$--$300$ nm) photometry gives the flare temperature and FUV/NUV flux ratio needed to connect flare radiation to atmospheric escape and photochemistry.

Load-bearing premise

The plan assumes that the relationship between flare energy and flare frequency seen in short Hubble ultraviolet observations continues smoothly to rarer, more energetic flares, and that the same relationship holds in SPARCS' two ultraviolet bands, so that one year of monitoring will actually catch once-per-month and once-per-year events.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Flare frequency distributions for low-mass stars will be extended from events occurring once per day down to once per month and once per year, the rarest and most energetic flares that drive atmospheric escape.
  • Simultaneous far-UV and near-UV measurements will give flare temperatures and FUV/NUV flux ratios, connecting observed flares to photochemical and thermal-escape models of exoplanet atmospheres.
  • Long stares will measure rotationally modulated quiescent ultraviolet variability (amplitudes up to roughly 25 percent), tracing starspot patterns across stellar ages.
  • The validated observations will anchor new model atmosphere grids that predict the unobservable extreme-UV radiation of low-mass stars, the part that actually governs atmospheric escape.
  • Successfully flying delta-doped detectors and detector-integrated metal-dielectric filters raises their technology readiness level for future ultraviolet flagship concepts.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the power-law extrapolation used in the simulations is right, SPARCS' first year will effectively calibrate the high-energy tail of flare statistics, giving atmospheric modelers a direct event budget instead of a scaled guess; that would change how exoplanet habitability simulations are driven.
  • The same long-stare observing mode could be turned on other targets in the 40-arcminute field, such as active galactic nuclei, which the paper lists as ancillary science; a community-wide program of short-cadence AGN ultraviolet monitoring would be a direct byproduct if scheduling and downlink allow.
  • Because read noise ended up about five times the original requirement, the mission shifted to brighter stars; an untested but natural follow-up is to quantify post-flight how much of the >95 percent flare-recovery fraction survives at the faint end of the M-dwarf population, the most common hosts of habitable-zone planets.
  • The paper treats student and postdoc training as a mission product; tracking where SPARCS alumni go next would turn that claim into a testable measure of whether small missions build the ultraviolet workforce for larger ones.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. SPARCS is a NASA-funded 6U CubeSat, now fully integrated and awaiting a late-2025 launch, that aims to monitor roughly 20 K and M stars in simultaneous far-UV (153--171 nm) and near-UV (260--300 nm) bands for 5--40 days each. The paper presents the mission's science goals, the nominal target list, the SPARCam detector and filter technology, assembly/integration/test results, software innovations, and a substantial set of programmatic lessons learned. The central science claim is that this long-duration monitoring will extend flare frequency distributions (FFDs) for low-mass stars from once-per-day events to once-per-month and once-per-year events, by recovering more than 95% of flares with energies above 10^31 erg and increasing cumulative UV exposure on low-mass stars by about three orders of magnitude relative to archival HST/GALEX data.

Significance. If the stated capabilities are realized, SPARCS would provide the first simultaneous FUV/NUV long-baseline monitoring of low-mass stars, with the potential to substantially extend empirical FFDs and to inform models of exoplanet atmospheric escape and photochemistry. The paper is transparent about engineering difficulties, particularly the read-noise problem discussed in Section 3.1, and the technology demonstrations (delta-doped CCDs, detector-integrated metal-dielectric filters, Rust-based flight software) are valuable contributions. The commitment to public archiving of data and models at MAST is commendable. However, the quantitative science forecasts are not fully supported by the analysis presented in the manuscript: the statistical yield of rare flares is not computed, the completeness claim is not re-derived for the final read-noise level, and the FFD extrapolations are presented without caveats. These issues affect the paper's central science justification but appear addressable through revised calculations and more careful framing.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section 2, Table 1] The sum of the stare times in Table 1 is 256 star-days, or about 0.7 star-years. For a flare rate of 'once per year' per star, the expected number of such flares over the entire mission is below one, and the target list deliberately includes old, inactive stars whose rates are lower than those of the young stars used to calibrate the FFDs. The claim in Section 2 and the Figure 2 caption that SPARCS will extend FFDs to 'once-per-year' events is therefore not supported by the stated observing plan. The authors should compute and present the expected number of flares above the completeness threshold for the actual target list and stare times, and temper the FFD-extension claim accordingly.
  2. [Section 3.1 and Section 2] The statement in Section 2 that SPARCS will recover more than 95% of flares with energies larger than 10^31 erg is not accompanied by a completeness analysis. Section 3.1 reports that measured read noise is 5 times the original requirement, and Figure 5 shows a large decline in expected SNR as a result, with the mitigation being a shift to brighter targets. No recomputed flare-completeness curve for the final instrument performance is shown. Because the recovery fraction is central to the mission's flare-statistics goal, the paper should either present the updated simulation with the final read noise and target list or explicitly state that the original 95% completeness figure is no longer claimed.
  3. [Section 2 and Figure 2] The simulated light curves and the >95% recovery rates rely on FFDs derived from HST FUV observations (refs [2,3]) and on the assumptions that these FFDs extrapolate as power laws to energies and rates two to three orders of magnitude beyond the observed range and that the same FFD shape applies in the SPARCS NUV band (260--300 nm). Neither assumption is justified or discussed as a limitation. A high-energy cutoff, a change in power-law slope, or a bandpass-dependent FFD would invalidate the central yield estimate. The paper should state these assumptions explicitly and, ideally, quantify how the expected flare yield depends on the assumed FFD shape.
  4. [Section 2 and Table 1] The claimed 'approximately three orders of magnitude' increase in cumulative UV exposure time relative to archival HST/GALEX data appears to compare a 40-day stare with roughly one hour of archival exposure. The average stare time in Table 1 is 13 days, which corresponds to a factor of about 300, not 1000, for a one-hour archival baseline. In addition, SPARCS is in low-Earth orbit, so Earth occultation will make 'continuous' monitoring approximate and will reduce the effective duty cycle. The exposure-gain factor should be recomputed with the actual stare-time distribution and an assumed or measured orbital duty cycle.
  5. [Section 2 and Section 8.8] The sensitivity limits quoted in Section 2 (m_FUV = 18.2 and m_NUV = 19.2 at SNR = 3 in a 10-minute integration) are given without uncertainties and are not reconciled with the 5x read-noise degradation described in Section 3.1 or with the statement in Section 8.8 that the team 'pivoted to a strategy focused on brighter stars.' Since the target list and sensitivity thresholds determine the detectability of both quiescent variability and flares, the paper should either re-derive these limits with final measured parameters or present them as pre-read-noise design values with a clear caveat.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3] There is a typographical error at the start of the paragraph: 'ecause silicon CCD detectors are sensitive...' should read 'Because silicon CCD detectors are sensitive...'.
  2. [Figure 2 caption] The caption contains a duplicated word: 'once-per-month and and once-per-year flares' should read 'once-per-month and once-per-year flares'.
  3. [Table 1] Several entries in the Age column appear to have formatting issues: '1508' for BD+20 1790 and HIP 106231 may be intended as '150' or '1500' Myr, and the rotation periods '0.710' and '2.710' look mangled. These should be corrected for clarity.
  4. [Section 2] The mission acronym GALEX is expanded as 'Galex Evolution Explorer'; the correct full name is the Galaxy Evolution Explorer.
  5. [Section 10] The Materials and Methods section states that ChatGPT 4.0 was used for grammatical and typographical review; this is an unusual disclosure for a scientific paper and may be better placed in the acknowledgments or removed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a mission status report whose forecasts rest on external HST/GALEX data, not on its own conclusions.

full rationale

This paper is a mission overview and lessons-learned report, not a derivation of new physical results from assumed inputs. The central claims—that SPARCS will extend flare frequency distributions (FFDs) from once-per-day to once-per-month and once-per-year events, and that it will recover >95% of flares above 1e31 erg—are conditional forecasts and instrument-performance estimates, not results derived from the same data they claim to predict. The FFDs used in the simulations are explicitly from HST observations in refs [2,3] (Loyd et al., HAZMAT IV and MUSCLES V), which are external observational datasets, not outputs of this paper. Similarly, the target flux densities are predictions from published PHOENIX/HAZMAT model grids, and the >95% recovery figure is a simulation-based sensitivity estimate. The paper does self-cite the HAZMAT/MUSCLES series, and those prior FFDs are load-bearing for the science case, but the cited results are independent, externally grounded HST/GALEX measurements rather than assertions whose truth is assumed by the present paper. The acknowledged read-noise degradation (5x above requirement, Section 3.1 and 8.8) and the shift to brighter targets are explicit limitations that affect the completeness calculations, but they are correctness risks, not circularity. No equation or claim in the paper reduces by construction to its own inputs, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Central claims rest on prior FFD measurements, instrument performance extrapolations, and unverified radiation tolerance; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Flare frequency distributions from HST FUV observations apply and extrapolate to the SPARCS FUV/NUV bands and to rare, high-energy flares.
    Section 2 and Figures 1-2: simulated light curves and the quoted >95% flare recovery fraction assume the HST-derived FFDs from refs [2,3] hold for the far more luminous and rarer events SPARCS hopes to detect.
  • domain assumption Delta-doped CCDs achieve near-100% internal quantum efficiency and the integrated ALD metal-dielectric filters provide the stated red-leak suppression (1e-3 to 1e-4, plus another order of magnitude from the dichroic).
    Section 3: the photometric sensitivity and 10% accuracy requirement depend on these ground-tested but not yet flight-validated performance values.
  • domain assumption Commercial off-the-shelf components can survive the radiation environment of a one-year sun-synchronous low-Earth orbit mission.
    Section 3 states explicitly that radiation tests were not conducted on SPARCam hardware and radiation effects are not specifically mitigated in the system design.
  • domain assumption PHOENIX upper-atmosphere models, supplemented by empirical FUV/NUV constraints, can predict EUV flux from low-mass stars to within a factor of two.
    Section 2.2: the planned EUV-NUV spectral model grid relies on this factor-of-two accuracy claim, which affects the mission's downstream value for photochemical and escape models.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Building SPARCS, an Ultraviolet Science CubeSat for Exoplanet Habitability Studies, Technology Advancements, and Mission Training." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TMESDZ6S

@misc{pith2026250703102,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Building SPARCS, an Ultraviolet Science CubeSat for Exoplanet Habitability Studies, Technology Advancements, and Mission Training},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TMESDZ6S}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.03102}
}
read the original abstract

The Star-Planet Activity Research CubeSat (SPARCS) is a NASA-funded 6U-CubeSat mission designed to monitor ultraviolet (UV) radiation from low-mass stars. These stars' relatively high-frequency and high-energy UV flares significantly affect the atmospheres of orbiting exoplanets, driving atmospheric loss and altering the conditions for habitability. SPARCS aims to capture time-resolved photometric data in the far-UV and near-UV simultaneously to better characterize the flares and detect the strongest and rarest among them. In addition, SPARCS is testing innovative technology, such as delta-doped detectors with near 100% internal quantum efficiency and detector-integrated metaldielectric UV bandpass filters. This mission will increase the technology readiness level of these critical components, positioning them for inclusion in future flagship missions like the Habitable Worlds Observatory. This paper outlines SPARCS' mission goals and provides an update as the spacecraft is completed and awaits its planned late-2025 launch to a sun-synchronous low-Earth orbit. It also highlights the critical role of small missions in providing training and leadership development opportunities for students and researchers, advancing technology for larger observatories, and shares lessons learned from collaborations between academic, government, and industry partners.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ESCAPE: a small explorer mission to study the stellar drivers of exoplanet evolution

    astro-ph.EP 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ESCAPE is a proposed NASA Small Explorer that would measure EUV spectra of about 300 nearby stars to constrain stellar EUV irradiance and coronal mass ejection rates affecting exoplanet habitability.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The Occurrence of Potentially Habitable Planets Or- biting M Dwarfs Estimated from the Full Kepler Dataset and an Empirical Measurement of the Detection Sensitivity,

    C. D. Dressing and D. Charbonneau, “The Occurrence of Potentially Habitable Planets Or- biting M Dwarfs Estimated from the Full Kepler Dataset and an Empirical Measurement of the Detection Sensitivity,”Astrophysical Journal 807, 45 (2015)

  2. [2]

    HAZMAT. IV . Flares and Superflares on Young M Stars in the Far Ultraviolet,

    R. O. P. Loyd, E. L. Shkolnik, A. C. Schneider, et al., “HAZMAT. IV . Flares and Superflares on Young M Stars in the Far Ultraviolet,”Astrophysical Journal 867, 70 (2018)

  3. [3]

    The MUSCLES Treasury Survey. V . FUV Flares on Active and Inactive M Dwarfs,

    R. O. P. Loyd, K. France, A. Youngblood, et al., “The MUSCLES Treasury Survey. V . FUV Flares on Active and Inactive M Dwarfs,”Astrophysical Journal 867, 71 (2018)

  4. [4]

    The Habitability of Proxima Centauri b: Environmental States and Observational Discriminants,

    V . S. Meadows, G. N. Arney, E. W. Schwieterman, et al. , “The Habitability of Proxima Centauri b: Environmental States and Observational Discriminants,” Astrobiology 18, 133– 189 (2018)

  5. [5]

    The Contribution of M-dwarf Flares to the Thermal Escape of Potentially Habitable Planet Atmospheres,

    L. N. R. do Amaral, R. Barnes, A. Segura, et al., “The Contribution of M-dwarf Flares to the Thermal Escape of Potentially Habitable Planet Atmospheres,” Astrophysical Journal 928, 12 (2022). 33

  6. [6]

    L. N. R. do Amaral, R. Barnes, and A. Segura, P´erdida atmosf´erica de planetas en la zona habitable por efecto de fulguraciones de estrellas enanas M . PhD thesis, Universidad Na- cional Aut´onoma de M´exico (2023)

  7. [7]

    The Impact of Stellar Flares on the Atmospheric Escape of Exoplanets Orbiting M Stars. I. Insights from the AU Mic System,

    L. N. R. do Amaral, E. L. Shkolnik, R. O. P. Loyd,et al., “The Impact of Stellar Flares on the Atmospheric Escape of Exoplanets Orbiting M Stars. I. Insights from the AU Mic System,” Astrophysical Journal 985, 100 (2025)

  8. [8]

    High stellar FUV/NUV ratio and oxygen contents in the atmospheres of potentially habitable planets,

    F. Tian, K. France, J. L. Linsky, et al., “High stellar FUV/NUV ratio and oxygen contents in the atmospheres of potentially habitable planets,” Earth and Planetary Science Letters 385, 22–27 (2014)

Show all 80 references
  1. [9]

    A continuum from clear to cloudy hot-Jupiter exoplanets without primordial water depletion,

    D. K. Sing, J. J. Fortney, N. Nikolov, et al., “A continuum from clear to cloudy hot-Jupiter exoplanets without primordial water depletion,” Nature 529, 59–62 (2016)

  2. [10]

    Atmospheric Escape From Hot Jupiters,

    R. A. Murray-Clay, E. I. Chiang, and N. Murray, “Atmospheric Escape From Hot Jupiters,” Astrophysical Journal 693, 23–42 (2009)

  3. [11]

    HAZMAT. I. The Evolution of Far-UV and Near-UV Emission from Early M Stars,

    E. L. Shkolnik and T. S. Barman, “HAZMAT. I. The Evolution of Far-UV and Near-UV Emission from Early M Stars,” Astronomical Journal 148, 64, 14pp (2014)

  4. [12]

    HAZMAT. V . The Ultraviolet and X-Ray Evolution of K Stars,

    T. Richey-Yowell, E. L. Shkolnik, A. C. Schneider, et al., “HAZMAT. V . The Ultraviolet and X-Ray Evolution of K Stars,” Astrophysical Journal 872, 17 (2019)

  5. [13]

    HAZMAT. IX. An Analysis of the UV and X-Ray Evolution of Low-mass Stars in the Era of Gaia,

    T. Richey-Yowell, E. L. Shkolnik, A. C. Schneider,et al., “HAZMAT. IX. An Analysis of the UV and X-Ray Evolution of Low-mass Stars in the Era of Gaia,” Astrophysical Journal 951, 44 (2023). 34

  6. [14]

    The High-energy Radiation Environment around a 10 Gyr M Dwarf: Habitable at Last?,

    K. France, G. Duvvuri, H. Egan, et al., “The High-energy Radiation Environment around a 10 Gyr M Dwarf: Habitable at Last?,” Astronomical Journal 160, 237 (2020)

  7. [15]

    HAZMAT. III. The UV Evolution of Mid- to Late-M Stars with GALEX,

    A. C. Schneider and E. L. Shkolnik, “HAZMAT. III. The UV Evolution of Mid- to Late-M Stars with GALEX,” Astronomical Journal 155, 122 (2018)

  8. [16]

    Extreme Water Loss and Abiotic O2Buildup on Planets Throughout the Habitable Zones of M Dwarfs,

    R. Luger and R. Barnes, “Extreme Water Loss and Abiotic O2Buildup on Planets Throughout the Habitable Zones of M Dwarfs,” Astrobiology 15, 119–143 (2015)

  9. [17]

    The MUSCLES Treasury Survey. I. Motivation and Overview,

    K. France, R. O. Parke Loyd, A. Youngblood, et al., “The MUSCLES Treasury Survey. I. Motivation and Overview,”Astrophysical Journal 820, 89 (2016)

  10. [18]

    HAZMAT. II. Ultraviolet Variability of Low-mass Stars in the GALEX Archive,

    B. E. Miles and E. L. Shkolnik, “HAZMAT. II. Ultraviolet Variability of Low-mass Stars in the GALEX Archive,” Astronomical Journal 154, 67 (2017)

  11. [19]

    False Positives for Extrasolar Life, and How to Account for Them,

    S. D. Domagal-Goldman, A. Segura, M. W. Claire, et al., “False Positives for Extrasolar Life, and How to Account for Them,” in Lunar and Planetary Science Conference , Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 45, 2109 (2014)

  12. [20]

    Abiotic O2 Levels on Planets around F, G, K, and M Stars: Possible False Positives for Life?,

    C. E. Harman, E. W. Schwieterman, J. C. Schottelkotte, et al., “Abiotic O2 Levels on Planets around F, G, K, and M Stars: Possible False Positives for Life?,” Astrophysical Journal 812, 137 (2015)

  13. [21]

    Testing Earthlike Atmospheric Evolution on Exo-Earths through Oxy- gen Absorption: Required Sample Sizes and the Advantage of Age-based Target Selection,

    A. Bixel and D. Apai, “Testing Earthlike Atmospheric Evolution on Exo-Earths through Oxy- gen Absorption: Required Sample Sizes and the Advantage of Age-based Target Selection,” Astrophysical Journal 896, 131 (2020). 35

  14. [22]

    Effect of stellar flares on the upper atmospheres of hd 189733b and hd 209458b,

    J. Chadney, T. Koskinen, M. Galand, et al., “Effect of stellar flares on the upper atmospheres of hd 189733b and hd 209458b,” Astronomy & Astrophysics 608, A75 (2017)

  15. [23]

    Effects of a solar flare on the martian hot o corona and photochemical escape,

    Y . Lee, C. Dong, D. Pawlowski, et al., “Effects of a solar flare on the martian hot o corona and photochemical escape,” Geophysical Research Letters 45(14), 6814–6822 (2018)

  16. [24]

    The Hubble PanCET program: an extensive search for metallic ions in the exosphere of GJ 436 b,

    L. A. dos Santos, D. Ehrenreich, V . Bourrier, et al. , “The Hubble PanCET program: an extensive search for metallic ions in the exosphere of GJ 436 b,” Astronomy & Astrophysics 629, A47 (2019)

  17. [25]

    Time-resolved photometry of the high-energy radiation of M dwarfs with the Star-Planet Activity Research Cubesat,

    T. Ramiaramanantsoa, J. D. Bowman, E. L. Shkolnik, et al. , “Time-resolved photometry of the high-energy radiation of M dwarfs with the Star-Planet Activity Research Cubesat,” Astronomische Nachrichten 343, e10068 (2022)

  18. [26]

    Growth of a delta-doped silicon layer by molecular beam epitaxy on a charge-coupled device for reflection-limited ultraviolet quantum efficiency,

    M. E. Hoenk, P. J. Grunthaner, F. J. Grunthaner, et al., “Growth of a delta-doped silicon layer by molecular beam epitaxy on a charge-coupled device for reflection-limited ultraviolet quantum efficiency,” Applied Physics Letters 61, 1084–1086 (1992)

  19. [27]

    Metal dielectric filters for solar blind silicon ultraviolet detectors,

    J. Hennessy, D. Jewell, A, M. Hoenk, et al., “Metal dielectric filters for solar blind silicon ultraviolet detectors,” Appl. Opt. 54, 3507–3512 (2015)

  20. [28]

    Science with the Ultraviolet Ex- plorer (UVEX),

    S. R. Kulkarni, F. A. Harrison, B. W. Grefenstette, et al., “Science with the Ultraviolet Ex- plorer (UVEX),” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2111.15608 (2021)

  21. [29]

    UVEX: the Ultraviolet Explorer,

    F. A. Harrison, B. W. Grefenstette, W. Craig, et al., “UVEX: the Ultraviolet Explorer,” in Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, J.-W. A. den Herder, S. Nikzad, and K. Nakazawa, Eds., 13093, 130930E, International Society for Optics and Photonics...

  22. [30]

    On the age of the TW Hydrae association and 2M1207334- 393254,

    D. Barrado Y Navascu ´es, “On the age of the TW Hydrae association and 2M1207334- 393254,” Astronomy & Astrophysics 459, 511–518 (2006)

  23. [31]

    SPIRou spectropolarimetry of the T Tauri star TW Hydrae: magnetic fields, accretion, and planets,

    J. F. Donati, P. I. Cristofari, L. T. Lehmann, et al. , “SPIRou spectropolarimetry of the T Tauri star TW Hydrae: magnetic fields, accretion, and planets,”Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 531, 3256–3278 (2024)

  24. [32]

    The surface magnetic activity of the weak- line T Tauri stars TW A 7 and TW A 25,

    B. A. Nicholson, G. Hussain, J. F. Donati, et al., “The surface magnetic activity of the weak- line T Tauri stars TW A 7 and TW A 25,”Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 504, 2461–2473 (2021)

  25. [33]

    All-sky Co-moving Recovery Of Nearby Young Members (ACRONYM). II. The β Pictoris Moving Group,

    E. L. Shkolnik, K. N. Allers, A. L. Kraus, et al., “All-sky Co-moving Recovery Of Nearby Young Members (ACRONYM). II. The β Pictoris Moving Group,” Astronomical Journal 154, 69 (2017)

  26. [34]

    RACE-OC project: Rotation and variability of young stellar associations within 100 pc,

    S. Messina, S. Desidera, M. Turatto, et al., “RACE-OC project: Rotation and variability of young stellar associations within 100 pc,” Astronomy & Astrophysics 520, A15 (2010)

  27. [35]

    The changing face of au mic b: stellar spots, spin-orbit commensurability, and transit timing variations as seen by cheops and tess,

    Szab ´o, Gy. M., Gandolfi, D., Brandeker, A., et al., “The changing face of au mic b: stellar spots, spin-orbit commensurability, and transit timing variations as seen by cheops and tess,” A&A 654, A159 (2021)

  28. [36]

    The M4.5V flare star AF Psc as seen in K2 engineering data,

    G. Ramsay and J. G. Doyle, “The M4.5V flare star AF Psc as seen in K2 engineering data,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 442, 2926–2928 (2014)

  29. [37]

    A self-consistent, absolute isochronal age scale for young moving groups in the solar neighbourhood,

    C. P. M. Bell, E. E. Mamajek, and T. Naylor, “A self-consistent, absolute isochronal age scale for young moving groups in the solar neighbourhood,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 454, 593–614 (2015). 37

  30. [38]

    The β Pictoris association low-mass mem- bers: Membership assessment, rotation period distribution, and dependence on multiplicity,

    S. Messina, A. C. Lanzafame, L. Malo, et al., “The β Pictoris association low-mass mem- bers: Membership assessment, rotation period distribution, and dependence on multiplicity,” Astronomy & Astrophysics 607, A3 (2017)

  31. [39]

    Analysis of combined radial velocities and activity of BD+20 1790: evidence supporting the existence of a planetary companion,

    M. Hern ´an-Obispo, M. Tuomi, M. C. G ´alvez-Ortiz, et al. , “Analysis of combined radial velocities and activity of BD+20 1790: evidence supporting the existence of a planetary companion,” Astronomy & Astrophysics 576, A66 (2015)

  32. [40]

    Identifying the Young Low-mass Stars within 25 pc. I. Spectroscopic Observations,

    E. Shkolnik, M. C. Liu, and I. N. Reid, “Identifying the Young Low-mass Stars within 25 pc. I. Spectroscopic Observations,” Astrophysical Journal 699, 649–666 (2009)

  33. [41]

    Most observations of the flare star ad leo,

    N. M. Hunt-Walker, E. J. Hilton, A. F. Kowalski, et al., “Most observations of the flare star ad leo,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 124(916), 545 (2012)

  34. [42]

    Improved Age Estimation for Solar-Type Dwarfs Using Activity-Rotation Diagnostics,

    E. E. Mamajek and L. A. Hillenbrand, “Improved Age Estimation for Solar-Type Dwarfs Using Activity-Rotation Diagnostics,” Astrophysical Journal 687, 1264–1293 (2008)

  35. [43]

    The Rotation Period of (epsilon)Eri From Photometry of its Starspots,

    G. J. Frey, B. Grim, D. S. Hall, et al., “The Rotation Period of (epsilon)Eri From Photometry of its Starspots,” Astronomical Journal 102, 1813 (1991)

  36. [44]

    The Hyades: distance, structure, dynamics, and age,

    M. A. C. Perryman, A. G. A. Brown, Y . Lebreton, et al., “The Hyades: distance, structure, dynamics, and age,” Astronomy & Astrophysics 331, 81–120 (1998)

  37. [45]

    A search for young exoplanets in Sectors 1-5 of the TESS full-frame images,

    M. P. Battley, D. Pollacco, and D. J. Armstrong, “A search for young exoplanets in Sectors 1-5 of the TESS full-frame images,”Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 496, 1197–1216 (2020). 38

  38. [46]

    On the Age and Binarity of Fomalhaut,

    E. E. Mamajek, “On the Age and Binarity of Fomalhaut,” Astrophysical Journal Letters 754, L20 (2012)

  39. [47]

    The Factory and the Beehive. IV . A Compre- hensive Study of the Rotation X-Ray Activity Relation in Praesepe and the Hyades,

    A. N ´u˜nez, M. A. Ag¨ueros, K. R. Covey, et al., “The Factory and the Beehive. IV . A Compre- hensive Study of the Rotation X-Ray Activity Relation in Praesepe and the Hyades,” Astro- physical Journal 931, 45 (2022)

  40. [48]

    The CARMENES search for exoplanets around M dwarfs. A super-Earth planet orbiting HD 79211 (GJ 338 B),

    E. Gonz ´alez- ´Alvarez, M. R. Zapatero Osorio, J. A. Caballero, et al. , “The CARMENES search for exoplanets around M dwarfs. A super-Earth planet orbiting HD 79211 (GJ 338 B),” Astronomy & Astrophysics 637, A93 (2020)

  41. [49]

    Asteroseismology of the Nearby K Dwarfσ Draconis Using the Keck Planet Finder and TESS,

    M. Hon, D. Huber, Y . Li,et al., “Asteroseismology of the Nearby K Dwarfσ Draconis Using the Keck Planet Finder and TESS,” Astrophysical Journal 975, 147 (2024)

  42. [50]

    Chromospheric Activity and Jitter Measurements for 2630 Stars on the California Planet Search,

    H. Isaacson and D. Fischer, “Chromospheric Activity and Jitter Measurements for 2630 Stars on the California Planet Search,” Astrophysical Journal 725, 875–885 (2010)

  43. [51]

    Living with a red dwarf: X-ray, uv, and ca ii activity–age relationships of m dwarfs,

    S. G. Engle, “Living with a red dwarf: X-ray, uv, and ca ii activity–age relationships of m dwarfs,” The Astrophysical Journal 960, 62 (2023)

  44. [52]

    Carmenes input catalogue of m dwarfs - iv. new rotation periods from photometric time series,

    D ´ıez Alonso, E., Caballero, J. A., Montes, D., et al., “Carmenes input catalogue of m dwarfs - iv. new rotation periods from photometric time series,”A&A 621, A126 (2019)

  45. [53]

    The Exoplanet Orbit Database,

    J. T. Wright, O. Fakhouri, G. W. Marcy, et al., “The Exoplanet Orbit Database,”Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 123, 412–422 (2011)

  46. [54]

    Activity in late-type dwarfs. III. Chromospheric and transition region line fluxes for two dM stars.,

    P. B. Byrne and J. G. Doyle, “Activity in late-type dwarfs. III. Chromospheric and transition region line fluxes for two dM stars.,” Astronomy & Astrophysics 208, 159–165 (1989). 39

  47. [55]

    Parallel Implementation of the PHOENIX Gener- alized Stellar Atmosphere Program,

    P. H. Hauschildt, E. Baron, and F. Allard, “Parallel Implementation of the PHOENIX Gener- alized Stellar Atmosphere Program,” Astrophysical Journal 483, 390–398 (1997)

  48. [56]

    The Limiting Effects of Dust in Brown Dwarf Model Atmospheres,

    F. Allard, P. H. Hauschildt, D. R. Alexander, et al., “The Limiting Effects of Dust in Brown Dwarf Model Atmospheres,” Astrophysical Journal 556, 357–372 (2001)

  49. [57]

    Predicting the Extreme Ultraviolet Radiation Environment of Exoplanets around Low-mass Stars: The TRAPPIST-1 System,

    S. Peacock, T. Barman, E. L. Shkolnik, et al., “Predicting the Extreme Ultraviolet Radiation Environment of Exoplanets around Low-mass Stars: The TRAPPIST-1 System,”Astrophysi- cal Journal 871, 235 (2019)

  50. [58]

    Predicting the Extreme Ultraviolet Radiation Environment of Exoplanets around Low-mass Stars: GJ 832, GJ 176, and GJ 436,

    S. Peacock, T. Barman, E. L. Shkolnik, et al., “Predicting the Extreme Ultraviolet Radiation Environment of Exoplanets around Low-mass Stars: GJ 832, GJ 176, and GJ 436,” Astro- physical Journal 886, 77 (2019)

  51. [59]

    HAZMAT VI: The Evolution of Extreme Ultraviolet Radiation Emitted from Early M Stars,

    S. Peacock, T. Barman, E. L. Shkolnik, et al., “HAZMAT VI: The Evolution of Extreme Ultraviolet Radiation Emitted from Early M Stars,” Astrophysical Journal 895, 5 (2020)

  52. [60]

    Effects of UV Stellar Spectral Uncer- tainty on the Chemistry of Terrestrial Atmospheres,

    D. J. Teal, E. M. R. Kempton, S. Bastelberger, et al., “Effects of UV Stellar Spectral Uncer- tainty on the Chemistry of Terrestrial Atmospheres,”Astrophysical Journal 927, 90 (2022)

  53. [61]

    The Intrinsic Extreme Ultraviolet Fluxes of F5 V TO M5 V Stars,

    J. L. Linsky, J. Fontenla, and K. France, “The Intrinsic Extreme Ultraviolet Fluxes of F5 V TO M5 V Stars,” Astrophysical Journal 780, 61, 11 pp (2014)

  54. [62]

    Reverberation mapping of active galactic nuclei,

    B. M. Peterson, “Reverberation mapping of active galactic nuclei,” Publications of the Astro- nomical Society of the Pacific 105, 247–268 (1993)

  55. [63]

    The time-variable ultraviolet sky: Active galactic nuclei, stars, and white dwarfs,

    R. B ¨uhler and J. Schliwinski, “The time-variable ultraviolet sky: Active galactic nuclei, stars, and white dwarfs,” Astronomy & Astrophysics 687, A313 (2024). 40

  56. [64]

    High-efficiency UV/optical/NIR detectors for large aperture telescopes and UV explorer missions: development of and field observations with delta-doped arrays,

    S. Nikzad, A. D. Jewell, M. E. Hoenk, et al., “High-efficiency UV/optical/NIR detectors for large aperture telescopes and UV explorer missions: development of and field observations with delta-doped arrays,” Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems 3, 036002 (2017)

  57. [65]

    Performance of the SPARCS UV camera and de- tectors,

    A. D. Jewell, C. Basset, S. Nikzad, et al., “Performance of the SPARCS UV camera and de- tectors,” in Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, J.-W. A. den Herder, S. Nikzad, and K. Nakazawa, Eds., Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers ...

  58. [66]

    Context cameras for the orbiting carbon obser- vatory 3 (oco-3) instrument,

    C. McKinney, T. Goodsall, M. Hoenk, et al., “Context cameras for the orbiting carbon obser- vatory 3 (oco-3) instrument,” in 2018 IEEE Aerospace Conference, 1–15 (2018)

  59. [67]

    Techniques and Review of Absolute Flux Calibration from the Ultraviolet to the Mid-Infrared,

    R. C. Bohlin, K. D. Gordon, and P. E. Tremblay, “Techniques and Review of Absolute Flux Calibration from the Ultraviolet to the Mid-Infrared,” Publications of the Astronomical Soci- ety of the Pacific 126, 711 (2014)

  60. [68]

    Assembly, integration, and testing of the Star-Planet Activity Research CubeSat (SPARCS),

    L. Jensen, J. Gamaunt, P. Scowen,et al., “Assembly, integration, and testing of the Star-Planet Activity Research CubeSat (SPARCS),” in Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Ul- traviolet to Gamma Ray, J.-W. A. den Herder, S. Nikzad, and K. Nakazawa, Eds., Society of Phot...

  61. [69]

    Photometric calibration in the ultraviolet of the Star-Planet Activity Research CubeSat (SPARCS),

    D. R. Ardila, E. Shkolnik, P. Scowen, et al., “Photometric calibration in the ultraviolet of the Star-Planet Activity Research CubeSat (SPARCS),” in Space Telescopes and Instrumen- tation 2024: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray , J.-W. A. den Herder, S. Nikzad, and K. Nakazawa, 41 Eds....

  62. [70]

    Calibration Target Selection for the SPARCS Satellite,

    A. Frymire and D. Ardila, “Calibration Target Selection for the SPARCS Satellite,”Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society 7, 73 (2023)

  63. [71]

    Star-Planet Activity Research CubeSat (SPARCS): instrument vacuum testing setup,

    J. Gamaunt, L. Jensen, P. Scowen, et al., “Star-Planet Activity Research CubeSat (SPARCS): instrument vacuum testing setup,” inSpace Telescopes and Instrumentation 2022: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, J.-W. A. den Herder, S. Nikzad, and K. Nakazawa, Eds., Society of Photo- Optical ...

  64. [72]

    On-Orbit Performance & Operation of the Attitude & Pointing Control Subsys- tems on ASTERIA,

    C. M. Pong, “On-Orbit Performance & Operation of the Attitude & Pointing Control Subsys- tems on ASTERIA,” in 32nd Annual AIAA/USU. Conference on Small Satellites, (2018)

  65. [73]

    Bringing rust to safety-critical systems in space,

    L. Seidel and J. Beier, “Bringing rust to safety-critical systems in space,” in IEEE Security for Space Systems (3S), (Noordwijk, Netherlands) (2024). Both authors contributed equally

  66. [74]

    Discovery of an Extremely Short Duration Flare from Proxima Centauri Using Millimeter through Far-ultraviolet Observa- tions,

    M. A. MacGregor, A. J. Weinberger, R. O. P. Loyd, et al., “Discovery of an Extremely Short Duration Flare from Proxima Centauri Using Millimeter through Far-ultraviolet Observa- tions,” Astrophysical Journal Letters 911, L25 (2021)

  67. [75]

    Onboard dynamic image expo- sure control for the Star-Planet Activity Research CubeSat (SPARCS),

    T. Ramiaramanantsoa, J. D. Bowman, E. L. Shkolnik, et al., “Onboard dynamic image expo- sure control for the Star-Planet Activity Research CubeSat (SPARCS),” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 509, 5702–5712 (2022)

  68. [76]

    The Soft X-ray Telescope for the SOLAR-A mis- sion,

    S. Tsuneta, L. Acton, M. Bruner, et al., “The Soft X-ray Telescope for the SOLAR-A mis- sion,” Solar Physics 136, 37–67 (1991). 42

  69. [77]

    The Hinode X-Ray Telescope (XRT): Camera Design, Performance and Operations,

    R. Kano, T. Sakao, H. Hara, et al., “The Hinode X-Ray Telescope (XRT): Camera Design, Performance and Operations,” Solar Physics 249, 263–279 (2008)

  70. [78]

    The Interface Region Imaging Spectrograph (IRIS),

    B. De Pontieu, A. M. Title, J. R. Lemen, et al., “The Interface Region Imaging Spectrograph (IRIS),” Solar Physics 289, 2733–2779 (2014)

  71. [79]

    Adaptive Light Curve Extractor (ALICE)

    T. Ramiaramanantsoa, J. D. Bowman, E. L. Shkolnik, et al., “Adaptive Light Curve Extractor (ALICE).” In preparation (2025)

  72. [80]

    On the verge of an astronomy CubeSat revolution,

    E. L. Shkolnik, “On the verge of an astronomy CubeSat revolution,” Nature Astronomy 2, 374–378 (2018). Biographies of authors Prof. Evgenya L. Shkolnik is a professor of astrophysics at ASU’s School of Earth and Space Exploration, Associate Director of the Interplanetary Initi...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.