Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Tunable and low-noise WSe$_2$ quantum emitters for quantum photonics

T0 review · 5 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Encapsulation plus bias cuts WSe2 emitter noise fivefold

desk verdict Careful study of hBN encapsulation plus bias for WSe2 emitters with useful figures of merit, but the headline fivefold improvement is confounded by comparing devices that differ in both encapsulation and nanopillar geometry. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.03355 v1 pith:GN4LAU5C submitted 2025-07-04 physics.optics cond-mat.mtrl-sciquant-ph

Athanasios Paralikis , Pawel Wyborski , Pietro Metuh , Niels Gregersen , Battulga Munkhbat This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticscond-mat.mtrl-sciquant-ph
keywords single-photonsourceWSe2quantumemitterhBNencapsulationchargenoiseStarktuningspectraldiffusiondeterministicstrainengineeringnanowrinkle
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) encapsulation combined with an applied electric bias suppresses the charge noise that broadens single-photon emission from WSe2 quantum emitters. It reports that encapsulation alone cuts spectral wandering from roughly 170 to 40 µeV and linewidth from roughly 500 to 150 µeV, and that adding bias narrows the line to the ~100 µeV resolution limit while allowing stable Stark tuning over 280 µeV. The authors define two figures of merit, the linewidth ratio $R = W_{\mathrm{exp}}/W_{\mathrm{rad}}$ and the total broadening $\Delta W = W_{\mathrm{exp}} - W_{\mathrm{rad}}$, and find both reduced more than fivefold relative to a bare, unbiased emitter. If correct, this gives a practical recipe for electrically controllable, low-noise single-photon sources in a two-dimensional semiconductor.

What carries the argument

The central objects are two quantitative figures of merit, the linewidth ratio $R = W_{\mathrm{exp}}/W_{\mathrm{rad}}$ and the total broadening $\Delta W = W_{\mathrm{exp}} - W_{\mathrm{rad}}$, where $W_{\mathrm{exp}}$ is the measured emission linewidth and $W_{\mathrm{rad}} = \hbar/(2\pi\tau)$ is the lifetime-limited linewidth extracted from time-resolved photoluminescence. These metrics turn the goal of transform-limited emission into a concrete benchmark. The mitigation mechanism is two-layered: few-layer hBN envelopes the WSe2 monolayer, screening it from substrate charge fluctuations, while a gold contact applies a bias that further stabilizes the local electrostatic environment and tunes the emission through the quantum-confined Stark effect.

What would settle it

Measure the same WSe2 quantum emitter before and after transferring the top hBN layer (or before and after applying bias) while keeping the nanopillar geometry fixed; if the linewidth and spectral wandering do not narrow by the claimed factors, the attribution to encapsulation and bias fails. Alternatively, resolve the emission with a high-resolution interferometric technique: if the true linewidth is not at or below ~100 µeV once the spectrometer resolution limit is removed, the central claim of reaching the resolution-limited regime is an instrument-resolution artifact.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the dominant line-broadening mechanism in WSe2 quantum emitters—charge noise from a fluctuating electrostatic environment—can be suppressed by a two-step strategy: passive screening with hBN encapsulation and active stabilization with electrostatic bias. In the encapsulated, biased device the measured linewidth $W_{\mathrm{exp}}$ reaches ~100 µeV, the spectrometer resolution limit, and the total broadening $\Delta W = W_{\mathrm{exp}} - W_{\mathrm{rad}}$ drops to 92.8 µeV, a more-than-fivefold reduction from 474.5 µeV in the unencapsulated, unbiased reference; the linewidth ratio $R = W_{\mathrm{exp}}/W_{\mathrm{rad}}$ falls from 4314 to 860. The paper also reports stable linear Stark tuning over 280 µeV, mono-exponential decay with a lifetime of about 10.5 ns, and single-photon purity $g^{(2)}(0) \approx 0.01$ with no observable blinking.

Load-bearing premise

The comparison that carries the fivefold claim is between different emitter sites in different devices—Device A with bare WSe2 on 150 nm nanopillars versus Device B with encapsulated WSe2 on 250 nm nanopillars—so emitter-to-emitter variation or the changed pillar geometry could account for part of the linewidth narrowing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, hBN encapsulation plus bias brings WSe2 emitter linewidths to the practical spectral resolution limit without requiring optical cavities or complex fabrication.
  • The more-than-fivefold reduction in $R$ and $\Delta W$ puts the emitter substantially closer to transform-limited emission; with phonon-assisted excitation the paper estimates $R$ could drop to about 150.
  • The 280 µeV Stark tuning range with stable emission enables electrical control of the single-photon energy, which is needed for matching photon frequencies in quantum interference schemes.
  • The absence of blinking and the measured $g^{(2)}(0) \approx 0.01$ under bias show that high single-photon purity survives the biasing, a prerequisite for indistinguishable-photon sources.
  • The $R$ and $\Delta W$ framework gives a standard way to compare noise mitigation across different TMD emitters, clarifying apparent discrepancies that arise purely from differences in radiative lifetime.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the fivefold reduction is measured across two different emitter sites in two devices with different nanopillar heights, a same-emitter before-and-after encapsulation test would be needed to fully isolate the encapsulation effect from site-to-site variation.
  • Since $W_{\mathrm{exp}}$ at $\pm 10$ V sits at the spectrometer resolution limit, the true intrinsic linewidth may be even narrower; higher-resolution interferometric spectroscopy could test whether the resolution-limited values really improve further.
  • A testable extension: applying the same encapsulation-plus-bias recipe to emitters with shorter radiative lifetimes (for example through Purcell enhancement) should push $R$ toward the transform limit, a quantitative prediction the paper makes ($R \sim 15$ with a modest Purcell factor).
  • The asymmetric response of the unencapsulated device to bias polarity suggests that encapsulation removes a directional charge environment; measuring the same emitter before and after top hBN transfer would test this directly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports a comparative study of noise mitigation in WSe2 quantum emitters. Two devices are fabricated: Device A, a bare WSe2 monolayer on a nanopillar array with gold contacts, and Device B, an hBN-encapsulated WSe2 monolayer on a taller nanopillar array with the same contact scheme. The authors measure photoluminescence spectra, time-resolved decay, spectral wandering, and second-order correlation under zero bias and under applied gate voltages. They report that hBN encapsulation alone reduces spectral wandering and linewidth, and that an additional applied bias narrows the linewidth to the spectrometer resolution limit (~100 μeV) while allowing Stark tuning over ~280 μeV. They define two figures of merit, R = Wexp/Wrad and ΔW = Wexp − Wrad, and report a fivefold reduction in both for the biased encapsulated device compared with the unencapsulated unbiased reference. The paper concludes that combining encapsulation with electrostatic biasing is an effective route toward low-noise, tunable WSe2 single-photon sources.

Significance. If the central attribution claim were fully established, this work would provide a useful quantitative framework (the R and ΔW metrics) for benchmarking noise mitigation in TMD quantum emitters, and it demonstrates some of the narrowest linewidths and highest single-photon purities reported for WSe2 emitters. The inclusion of time-resolved decay, spectral wandering analysis, and g(2) measurements is a strength. However, the central claim that hBN encapsulation alone is responsible for the observed improvements is weakened by a device comparison that is not controlled for nanopillar geometry or emitter-to-emitter variation. The paper's own figures and text contain several numerical inconsistencies that need to be resolved before the quantitative fivefold improvement can be accepted. With additional controls or a substantially softened attribution, the work could be a valuable contribution; as it stands, the headline conclusion is not firmly supported.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section II.B and Methods V.A] The comparison between Device A and Device B is not controlled: the two devices differ in nanopillar height (150 nm vs 250 nm) and in the specific emitter selected for measurement. The improvements in linewidth and spectral wandering are therefore not cleanly attributable to hBN encapsulation, since these differences could also stem from the strain profile or from intrinsic emitter-to-emitter variation. This comparison is load-bearing for the central claim in Section III of a fivefold reduction in R and ΔW. To support the attribution, the authors should either provide control devices with identical pillar geometry but without hBN, present statistics from multiple emitters per device, or explicitly rephrase the claim to state that the improvement is observed in the encapsulated device without causal attribution to hBN alone.
  2. [Section II.D and Fig. 5] The values of Wexp used for the figures of merit are inconsistent with those reported earlier in the paper. Section II.B reports Wexp = 524 ± 18 μeV for Device A and 125 ± 4 μeV for Device B at zero bias, while Section II.D and Fig. 5 use 474.6 μeV and 141.5 μeV, respectively. The time-trace averages in Section II.B are 452 ± 58 μeV and 132.5 ± 13.3 μeV. The text does not explain which values are used for R and ΔW or why they differ. This inconsistency undermines the quantitative fivefold reduction claim and must be clarified with a consistent set of values and a statement of how they were derived.
  3. [Figure 2 caption and Section II.B] The spectral wandering values differ by approximately a factor of two between the main text and the figure caption. The text reports 172 μeV for Device A and 50 μeV for Device B, while the caption of Fig. 2 reports 290 μeV and 70 μeV, respectively. Since spectral wandering is one of the headline improvements of encapsulation, this discrepancy is significant and must be reconciled.
  4. [Section II.C and Methods V.B] The statement that Wexp reaches the 'resolution limit' of ~100 μeV is not supported by a direct measurement of the instrumental linewidth. The authors do not report a calibration using a narrow laser line or an equivalent measurement under identical spectrometer settings (grating, slit, wavelength). Without such a calibration, the claim that the linewidth is resolution-limited, and the associated conclusion that ΔW is as low as 92.8 μeV, are not firmly established. Please provide the instrument response measurement or explicitly state how the resolution limit was determined.
  5. [Section II.D and Fig. 2C,D] The radiative-limited linewidth Wrad is computed assuming mono-exponential decay for Device B, but for Device A the lifetime is extracted from the slow component of a biexponential fit (τ2 = 5.92 ns), ignoring the fast component (τ1 = 0.23 ns). This asymmetric treatment can bias the comparison of R and ΔW because the effective radiative lifetime in a biexponential decay is not simply the dominant slow component. Please justify the use of the slow component for Device A or adopt a consistent definition (e.g., an amplitude-weighted mean lifetime) for both devices.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Figure 2 caption] The caption states 'All spectra are collected using a 650 nm pulsed laser excitation scheme,' but the text in Section II.B says that the spectra in Figs. 2A, 2B, 2E, and 2F were recorded under 650 nm CW excitation. This contradiction should be corrected.
  2. [Abstract and Section II.B] The value g(2)(0) = 0.01 ± 0.13 is reported as evidence of 99% purity. While the value is consistent with good single-photon emission, the large uncertainty (larger than the value itself) should be acknowledged in the abstract or text to avoid overprecision.
  3. [Section II.D, Eq. (1)] The decomposition Wexp = Wrad + Wpd + Wnoise assumes an additive relationship between phonon dephasing and charge-noise broadening. This is an approximation and might deserve a brief caveat, although it does not affect the definitions of R and ΔW.
  4. [Author list] The author name 'Pawe l Wyborski' appears to contain a stray space; it should be 'Pawel Wyborski'.
  5. [Section II.B] The text says Device B shows a 'three-fold improvement' in spectral wandering, but the ratio 172 μeV / 50 μeV is 3.4; 'more than threefold' would be more precise.
  6. [Section III] The claim that ΔW at Vbias = −10 V 'surpasses the best previously reported' is not accompanied by a direct citation to the prior best value. Please add a reference or a comparative table to support this statement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the figures of merit are definitions over independently measured Wexp and Wrad; the main weaknesses are experimental confounds, not circular reductions.

full rationale

The quantitative claims (R = Wexp/Wrad and ΔW = Wexp − Wrad) are not fitted parameters called predictions: Wexp is measured by Lorentzian fitting of μPL spectra, and Wrad is computed from independently measured TRPL lifetimes via Wrad = ħ/(2πτ). Neither quantity is defined in terms of the other in a way that forces the reported fivefold reduction; the reduction is a direct comparison of two measured values. The only self-citation with any substantive weight is Ref. 40 (same-group theory), used to assert that charge noise (Wnoise) dominates the total broadening in WSe2 emitters. This is motivational context rather than a load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz: the paper does not derive its observed linewidths from that theory, and the encapsulation/biasing effect is evidenced directly by spectral, TRPL, and correlation measurements. The main scientific weakness is experimental, not circular: Devices A and B differ in both hBN encapsulation and nanopillar height (150 nm vs 250 nm, explicitly stated in Methods), and only one representative emitter per device is compared, so emitter-to-emitter variation and strain-profile differences are uncontrolled confounds. The paper also acknowledges the spectrometer resolution limit (~100 μeV) as a floor, which affects interpretation of ΔW but does not make the metric self-referential. These issues lower confidence in the causal attribution to hBN screening, but they do not constitute a derivation being equivalent to its inputs. Reductions in R and ΔW are arithmetic consequences of measured linewidths and lifetimes, not predictions forced by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to support the central claims; the figures of merit are computed from measured linewidths and lifetimes, and the resolution limit is an instrumental property. The axioms listed are the modeling and experimental assumptions the central comparison depends on. No new physical entities are introduced; R and Delta-W are mathematical definitions, not entities requiring independent evidence.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The measured PL lifetime equals the radiative lifetime, so Wrad = h/(2 pi tau)
    Invoked in Section II.D to convert TRPL lifetimes into radiative-limited linewidths. No quantum efficiency or Purcell factor measurement is provided, so non-radiative channels could make the true natural linewidth broader than h/(2 pi tau_measured).
  • ad hoc to paper The two devices differ only in encapsulation and are otherwise comparable for attributing the linewidth reduction to hBN
    Used implicitly in Section II.B where Device A and Device B emitters are compared. The devices use different nanopillar heights (150 nm vs 250 nm) and the emitters are different sites, so the comparison is not controlled.
  • domain assumption Charge noise, rather than phonon dephasing, dominates the excess broadening Wnoise
    Stated in Section II.D citing the authors' own Ref 40. This assumption motivates interpreting linewidth reduction as charge-noise mitigation, but the paper does not directly measure the phonon contribution.
  • domain assumption The spectrometer resolution limit is ~100 micro-electronvolts and linewidths quoted at that value are valid upper bounds for computing figures of merit
    Used in Section II.D and Fig. 5A where Wexp at +/-10 V is taken as the measured linewidth even though it is resolution-limited. The paper acknowledges this caveat.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tunable and low-noise WSe$_2$ quantum emitters for quantum photonics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GN4LAU5C

@misc{pith2026250703355,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tunable and low-noise WSe$_2$ quantum emitters for quantum photonics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GN4LAU5C}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.03355}
}
abstract

Low-noise and tunable single-photon sources are essential components of photonic quantum technologies. However, in WSe$_2$ quantum emitters, charge noise from fluctuations in their local electrostatic environment remains a major obstacle to achieving transform-limited single-photon emission and high photon indistinguishability. Here, we systematically investigate two noise mitigation strategies in hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) encapsulation and electrostatic biasing. We demonstrate that hBN encapsulation alone suppresses spectral wandering (from $\sim$170 $\mu$eV to $\sim$40 $\mu$eV) and narrows emission linewidths (from $\sim$500 $\mu$eV to $\sim$150 $\mu$eV), while applied bias enables stable Stark tuning over a 280 $\mu$eV range and further linewidth narrowing down to $\sim$100 $\mu$eV reaching the resolution-limited regime. Time-resolved and second-order correlation measurements confirm stable mono-exponential decay and high single-photon purity ($g^{(2)}(0) \approx 0.01$) with no observable blinking. To quantify progress toward the transform limit, we define two figures of merit: the linewidth ratio $R = W_{\text{exp}} / W_{\text{rad}}$ and total broadening $\Delta W = W_{\text{exp}} - W_{\text{rad}}$, with both being reduced more than five-fold in optimized devices. These results provide a robust framework for developing and evaluating low-noise, tunable WSe$_2$ quantum emitters, potentially realizing electrically controllable sources of indistinguishable single-photons for future photonic quantum technologies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.03355 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A depicts a bare WSe2 monolayer hosting a quantum emitter, on a standard SiO2/Si substrate. In this configuration, the emitter is highly susceptible to charge noise arising from trapped charges in the sub￾strate and free carriers within the host monolayer WSe2 itself. These fluctuating charges generate local electric fields that shift the exciton energy via the quantum￾confined Stark effect, leading to temporal spec… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Toward triggered generation of indistinguishable single-photons from MoTe$_2$ quantum emitters

    physics.optics 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Single-photon emitters in bilayer MoTe2 show near-infrared emission and a post-selected Hong-Ou-Mandel visibility up to about 40 percent, the first such measurement for a TMD emitter.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    author author Niels \ Gregersen , author Dara P.S. \ McCutcheon , \ and\ author Jesper \ Mørk ,\ title Single-photon sources , \ in\ https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315152318 booktitle Handbook of Optoelectronic Device Modeling and Simulation ,\ Vol. volume 2 \ ( publisher CRC Press ,\ year 2017 )\ p.\ pages 585–604 ,\ edition 1st \ ed. Stop

    work page doi:10.4324/9781315152318

  2. [2]

    author author W.B. \ Gao , author Parisa \ Fallahi , author Emre \ Togan , author Javier \ Miguel-S \'a nchez , \ and\ author Atac \ Imamoglu ,\ title title Observation of entanglement between a quantum dot spin and a single photon , \ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 491 ,\ pages 426--430 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    author author Jianwei \ Wang , author Fabio \ Sciarrino , author Anthony \ Laing , \ and\ author Mark G \ Thompson ,\ title title Integrated photonic quantum technologies , \ @noop journal journal Nature Photonics \ volume 14 ,\ pages 273--284 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    author author Feihu \ Xu , author Xiongfeng \ Ma , author Qiang \ Zhang , author Hoi-Kwong \ Lo , \ and\ author Jian-Wei \ Pan ,\ title title Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices , \ @noop journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 92 ,\ pages 025002 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    author author Pascale \ Senellart , author Glenn \ Solomon , \ and\ author Andrew \ White ,\ title title High-performance semiconductor quantum-dot single-photon sources , \ @noop journal journal Nature Nanotechnology \ volume 12 ,\ pages 1026--1039 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    author author Xing \ Ding , author Yu He , author Z-C \ Duan , author Niels \ Gregersen , author M-C \ Chen , author S Unsleber , author Sebastian \ Maier , author Christian \ Schneider , author Martin \ Kamp , author Sven \ H \"o fling , et al. ,\ title title On-demand single photons with high extraction efficiency and near-unity indistinguishability fro...

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    \ Thomas , author M

    author author S.E. \ Thomas , author M. Billard , author N. Coste , author S.C. \ Wein , author Priya , author H. Ollivier , author Olivier \ Krebs , author L. Taza \" rt , author A. Harouri , author A. Lemaitre , et al. ,\ title title Bright polarized single-photon source based on a linear dipole , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume...

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    \ Vajner , author Florian \ Kappe , author Paul C.A

    author author Yusuf \ Karli , author Daniel A. \ Vajner , author Florian \ Kappe , author Paul C.A. \ Hagen , author Lena M. \ Hansen , author Ren \'e \ Schwarz , author Thomas K. \ Bracht , author Christian \ Schimpf , author Saimon F. \ Covre da Silva , author Philip \ Walther , et al. ,\ title title Controlling the photon number coherence of solid-stat...

    work page 2024

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    ,\ title title Coherent swing-up excitation for semiconductor quantum dots , \ @noop journal journal Advanced Quantum Technologies \ volume 7 ,\ pages 2300359 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    author author Katarina \ Boos , author Friedrich \ Sbresny , author Sang Kyu \ Kim , author Malte \ Kremser , author Hubert \ Riedl , author Frederik W \ Bopp , author William \ Rauhaus , author Bianca \ Scaparra , author Klaus D \ J \"o ns , author Jonathan J \ Finley , et al...

    2024

  2. [10]

    author author Yuming \ Wei , author Shunfa \ Liu , author Xueshi \ Li , author Ying \ Yu , author Xiangbin \ Su , author Shulun \ Li , author Xiangjun \ Shang , author Hanqing \ Liu , author Huiming \ Hao , author Haiqiao \ Ni , et al. ,\ title title Tailoring solid-state sing...

    2022

  3. [11]

    \ Montblanch , author Matteo \ Barbone , author Igor \ Aharonovich , author Mete \ Atat \"u re , \ and\ author Andrea C

    author author Alejandro R.-P. \ Montblanch , author Matteo \ Barbone , author Igor \ Aharonovich , author Mete \ Atat \"u re , \ and\ author Andrea C. \ Ferrari ,\ title title Layered materials as a platform for quantum technologies , \ @noop journal journal Nature Nanotechnol...

    2023

  4. [12]

    author author Jae-Pil \ So ,\ title title Deterministic generation and nanophotonic integration of 2d quantum emitters for advanced quantum photonic functionalities , \ @noop journal journal Nanophotonics \ ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025

  5. [13]

    author author Martin \ Esmann , author Stephen C. \ Wein , \ and\ author Carlos \ Ant \'o n-Solanas ,\ title title Solid-state single-photon sources: Recent advances for novel quantum materials , \ @noop journal journal Advanced Functional Materials \ volume 34 ,\ pages 231593...

    2024

  6. [14]

    \ Liu , author L

    author author H.J. \ Liu , author L. Jiao , author L. Xie , author F. Yang , author J.L. \ Chen , author W.K. \ Ho , author C.L. \ Gao , author J.F. \ Jia , author X.D. \ Cui , \ and\ author M.H. \ Xie ,\ title title Molecular-beam epitaxy of monolayer and bilayer WSe\(_2\) : ...

    2015

  7. [15]

    \ Sanchez , author Jiamin \ Quan , author Akshay \ Singh , et al

    author author Kha \ Tran , author Galan \ Moody , author Fengcheng \ Wu , author Xiaobo \ Lu , author Junho \ Choi , author Kyounghwan \ Kim , author Amritesh \ Rai , author Daniel A. \ Sanchez , author Jiamin \ Quan , author Akshay \ Singh , et al. ,\ title title Evidence for...

    2019

  8. [16]

    \ Scott , author Vincent \ Overbeck , author Gunnar \ Bergh \"a user , author John \ Schaibley , author Edward J

    author author Akshay \ Singh , author Galan \ Moody , author Kha \ Tran , author Marie E. \ Scott , author Vincent \ Overbeck , author Gunnar \ Bergh \"a user , author John \ Schaibley , author Edward J. \ Seifert , author Dennis \ Pleskot , author Nathaniel M \ Gabor , et al....

    2016

  9. [17]

    author author Philipp \ Tonndorf , author Osvaldo \ Del Pozo-Zamudio , author Nico \ Gruhler , author Johannes \ Kern , author Robert \ Schmidt , author Alexander I \ Dmitriev , author Anatoly P \ Bakhtinov , author Alexander I \ Tartakovskii , author Wolfram \ Pernice , autho...

    2017

  10. [18]

    author author Igor \ Aharonovich , author Dirk \ Englund , \ and\ author Milos \ Toth ,\ title title Solid-state single-photon emitters , \ 10.1038/nphoton.2016.186 journal journal Nature Photonics \ volume 10 ,\ pages 631--641 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  11. [19]

    author author Lukas \ Linhart , author Matthias \ Paur , author Valerie \ Smejkal , author Joachim \ Burgd\"orfer , author Thomas \ Mueller , \ and\ author Florian \ Libisch ,\ title title Localized intervalley defect excitons as single-photon emitters in WSe\(_2\) , \ 10.1103...

    doi

  12. [20]

    \ Stevens , author Hsun-Jen \ Chuang , author Matthew R

    author author Christopher E. \ Stevens , author Hsun-Jen \ Chuang , author Matthew R. \ Rosenberger , author Kathleen M. \ McCreary , author Chandriker Kavir \ Dass , author Berend T. \ Jonker , \ and\ author Joshua R. \ Hendrickson ,\ title title Enhancing the purity of deter...

    2022

  13. [21]

    \ Abramov , author Igor Y

    author author Artem N. \ Abramov , author Igor Y. \ Chestnov , author Ekaterina S. \ Alimova , author Tatiana \ Ivanova , author Ivan S. \ Mukhin , author Dmitry N. \ Krizhanovskii , author Ivan A. \ Shelykh , author Ivan V. \ Iorsh , \ and\ author Vasily \ Kravtsov ,\ title t...

    2023

  14. [22]

    author author Athanasios \ Paralikis , author Claudia \ Piccinini , author Abdulmalik A. \ Madigawa , author Pietro \ Metuh , author Luca \ Vannucci , author Niels \ Gregersen , \ and\ author Battulga \ Munkhbat ,\ title title Tailoring polarization in WSe\(_2\) quantum emitte...

    2024

  15. [23]

    author author Kamyar \ Parto , author Shaimaa I. \ Azzam , author Kaustav \ Banerjee , \ and\ author Galan \ Moody ,\ title title Defect and strain engineering of monolayer WSe\(_2\) enables site-controlled single-photon emission up to 150 k , \ 10.1038/s41467-021-23709-5 jour...

    doi

  16. [24]

    \ Odom , author Subramanian K.R.S

    author author Lintao \ Peng , author Henry \ Chan , author Priscilla \ Choo , author Teri W. \ Odom , author Subramanian K.R.S. \ Sankaranarayanan , \ and\ author Xuedan \ Ma ,\ title title Creation of single-photon emitters in WSe\(_2\) monolayers using nanometer-sized gold t...

    2020

  17. [25]

    author author Shaimaa I. \ Azzam , author Kamyar \ Parto , \ and\ author Galan \ Moody ,\ title title Purcell enhancement and polarization control of single-photon emitters in monolayer WSe\(_2\) using dielectric nanoantennas , \ @noop journal journal Nanophotonics \ volume 12...

    2023

  18. [26]

    \ Shepard , author Jenny V

    author author Yue \ Luo , author Gabriella D. \ Shepard , author Jenny V. \ Ardelean , author Daniel A. \ Rhodes , author Bumho \ Kim , author Katayun \ Barmak , author James C. \ Hone , \ and\ author Stefan \ Strauf ,\ title title Deterministic coupling of site-controlled qua...

    2018

  19. [27]

    author author David D \ Xu , author Albert F \ Vong , author M Iqbal Bakti \ Utama , author Dmitry \ Lebedev , author Riddhi \ Ananth , author Mark C \ Hersam , author Emily A \ Weiss , \ and\ author Chad A \ Mirkin ,\ title title Sub-diffraction correlation of quantum emitter...

    2024

  20. [28]

    \ Xu , author Albert F

    author author David D. \ Xu , author Albert F. \ Vong , author Dmitry \ Lebedev , author Riddhi \ Ananth , author Alexa M. \ Wong , author Paul T. \ Brown , author Mark C. \ Hersam , author Chad A. \ Mirkin , \ and\ author Emily A. \ Weiss ,\ title title Conversion of classica...

    2023

  21. [29]

    author author Laxmi Narayan \ Tripathi , author Oliver \ Iff , author Simon \ Betzold , author ukasz \ Dusanowski , author Monika \ Emmerling , author Kihwan \ Moon , author Young Jin \ Lee , author Soon-Hong \ Kwon , author Sven \ H \"o fling , \ and\ author Christian \ Schne...

    1919

  22. [30]

    ,\ title title Strain-tunable single photon sources in WSe\(_2\) monolayers , \ @noop journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 19 ,\ pages 6931--6936 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    author author Oliver \ Iff , author Davide \ Tedeschi , author Javier \ Mart \' n-S \'a nchez , author Magdalena \ Mocza a-Dusanowska , author Sefaattin \ Tongay , author Kentaro \ Yumigeta , author Javier \ Taboada-Guti \'e rrez , author Matteo \ Savaresi , author Armando \ R...

    2019

  23. [31]

    Klein , author M

    author author J. Klein , author M. Lorke , author M. Florian , author F. Sigger , author L. Sigl , author S. Rey , author J. Wierzbowski , author J. Cerne , author K. M \"u ller , author E. Mitterreiter , et al. ,\ title title Site-selectively generated photon emitters in mono...

    2019

  24. [32]

    o tger , author L. Sigl , author M. Florian , author T. Taniguchi , author K. Watanabe , author K. M \

    author author A. Micevic , author N. Pettinger , author A. H \"o tger , author L. Sigl , author M. Florian , author T. Taniguchi , author K. Watanabe , author K. M \"u ller , author J.J. \ Finley , author C. Kastl , et al. ,\ title title On-demand generation of optically activ...

    2022

  25. [33]

    \ Jones , author Jia-Shiang \ Chen , author George C

    author author Wei \ Wang , author Leighton O. \ Jones , author Jia-Shiang \ Chen , author George C. \ Schatz , \ and\ author Xuedan \ Ma ,\ title title Utilizing ultraviolet photons to generate single-photon emitters in semiconductor monolayers , \ @noop journal journal ACS Na...

    2022

  26. [34]

    author author Huan \ Zhao , author Michael T \ Pettes , author Yu Zheng , \ and\ author Han \ Htoon ,\ title title Site-controlled telecom-wavelength single-photon emitters in atomically-thin MoTe\(_2\) , \ @noop journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 12 ,\ pages 6753 ...

    2021

  27. [35]

    author author Leo \ Yu , author Minda \ Deng , author Jingyuan Linda \ Zhang , author Sven \ Borghardt , author Beata \ Kardynal , author Jelena \ Vuckovic , \ and\ author Tony F \ Heinz ,\ title title Site-controlled quantum emitters in monolayer MoSe\(_2\) , \ @noop journal ...

    2021

  28. [36]

    \ Lenferink , author Trevor \ LaMountain , author Teodor K

    author author Erik J. \ Lenferink , author Trevor \ LaMountain , author Teodor K. \ Stanev , author Ethan \ Garvey , author Kenji \ Watanabe , author Takashi \ Taniguchi , \ and\ author Nathaniel P. \ Stern ,\ title title Tunable emission from localized excitons deterministica...

    2022

  29. [37]

    \ Jungwirth , author Gregory D

    author author Chitraleema \ Chakraborty , author Nicholas R. \ Jungwirth , author Gregory D. \ Fuchs , \ and\ author A. Nick \ Vamivakas ,\ title title Electrical manipulation of the fine-structure splitting of WSe\(_2\) quantum emitters , \ @noop journal journal Physical Revi...

    2019

  30. [38]

    author author James \ Howarth , author Kristina \ Vaklinova , author Magdalena \ Grzeszczyk , author Giulio \ Baldi , author Lee \ Hague , author Marek \ Potemski , author Kostya S. \ Novoselov , author Aleksey \ Kozikov , \ and\ author Maciej \ Koperski ,\ title title Electro...

    2024

  31. [39]

    \ Banerjee ,\ title title Monolayer-based single-photon source in a liquid-helium-free open cavity featuring 65\ pages 8683--8689 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    author author Jens-Christian \ Drawer , author Victor Nikolaevich \ Mitryakhin , author Hangyong \ Shan , author Sven \ Stephan , author Moritz \ Gittinger , author Lukas \ Lackner , author Bo Han , author Gilbert \ Leibeling , author Falk \ Eilenberger , \ and\ author Rounak ...

    2023

  32. [40]

    author author Luca \ Vannucci , author Jos \'e Ferreira \ Neto , author Claudia \ Piccinini , author Athanasios \ Paralikis , author Niels \ Gregersen , \ and\ author Battulga \ Munkhbat ,\ title title Single-photon emitters in WSe\(_2\) : Critical role of phonons on excitatio...

    2024

  33. [41]

    \ Allain , author Dominik S

    author author Ajit \ Srivastava , author Meinrad \ Sidler , author Adrien V. \ Allain , author Dominik S. \ Lembke , author Andras \ Kis , \ and\ author Ata c \ \.I mamo g lu ,\ title title Optically active quantum dots in monolayer WSe\(_2\) , \ @noop journal journal Nature N...

    2015

  34. [42]

    author author Santosh \ Kumar , author Artur \ Kaczmarczyk , \ and\ author Brian D. \ Gerardot ,\ title title Strain-induced spatial and spectral isolation of quantum emitters in mono-and bilayer WSe\(_2\) , \ @noop journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 15 ,\ pages 7567--7573 ...

    2015

  35. [43]

    author author Claudia \ Piccinini , author Athanasios \ Paralikis , author Jos \'e Ferreira \ Neto , author Abdulmalik A \ Madigawa , author Pawe \ Wyborski , author Vikas \ Remesh , author Luca \ Vannucci , author Niels \ Gregersen , \ and\ author Battulga \ Munkhbat ,\ title...

    2025

  36. [44]

    \ Steele , author Andres \ Castellanos-Gomez , author Herre S

    author author Philipp \ Tonndorf , author Robert \ Schmidt , author Robert \ Schneider , author Johannes \ Kern , author Michele \ Buscema , author Gary A. \ Steele , author Andres \ Castellanos-Gomez , author Herre S. J. \ van der Zant , author Steffen \ Michaelis de Vasconce...

    2015

  37. [45]

    author author Artur \ Branny , author Santosh \ Kumar , author Rapha \"e l \ Proux , \ and\ author Brian D. \ Gerardot ,\ title title Deterministic strain-induced arrays of quantum emitters in a two-dimensional semiconductor , \ @noop journal journal Nature Communications \ vo...

    2017

  38. [46]

    author author Hyoju \ Kim , author Jong Sung \ Moon , author Gichang \ Noh , author Jieun \ Lee , \ and\ author Je-Hyung \ Kim ,\ title title Position and frequency control of strain-induced quantum emitters in WSe\(_2\) monolayers , \ @noop journal journal Nano Letters \ volu...

    2019

  39. [47]

    \ Daveau , author Tom \ Vandekerckhove , author Arunabh \ Mukherjee , author Zefang \ Wang , author Jie \ Shan , author Kin Fai \ Mak , author A

    author author Rapha \"e l S. \ Daveau , author Tom \ Vandekerckhove , author Arunabh \ Mukherjee , author Zefang \ Wang , author Jie \ Shan , author Kin Fai \ Mak , author A. Nick \ Vamivakas , \ and\ author Gregory D. \ Fuchs ,\ title title Spectral and spatial isolation of s...

    2020

  40. [48]

    author author Charalampos \ Androulidakis , author Kaihao \ Zhang , author Matthew \ Robertson , \ and\ author Sameh \ Tawfick ,\ title title Tailoring the mechanical properties of 2d materials and heterostructures , \ @noop journal journal 2D Materials \ volume 5 ,\ pages 032...

    2018

  41. [49]

    author author Jae-Pil \ So , author Kwang-Yong \ Jeong , author Jung Min \ Lee , author Kyoung-Ho \ Kim , author Soon-Jae \ Lee , author Woong \ Huh , author Ha-Reem \ Kim , author Jae-Hyuck \ Choi , author Jin Myung \ Kim , author Yoon Seok \ Kim , et al. ,\ title title Polar...

    2021

  42. [50]

    author author Oliver \ Iff , author Quirin \ Buchinger , author Magdalena \ Mocza a-Dusanowska , author Martin \ Kamp , author Simon \ Betzold , author Marcelo \ Davanco , author Kartik \ Srinivasan , author Sefaattin \ Tongay , author Carlos \ Ant \'o n-Solanas , author Sven ...

    2021

  43. [51]

    \ Kuhlmann , author Martina \ Renggli , author Yongheng \ Huo , author Fei \ Ding , author Rinaldo \ Trotta , author Marcus \ Reindl , author Oliver G

    author author Jan-Philipp \ Jahn , author Mathieu \ Munsch , author Lucas \ B \'e guin , author Andreas V. \ Kuhlmann , author Martina \ Renggli , author Yongheng \ Huo , author Fei \ Ding , author Rinaldo \ Trotta , author Marcus \ Reindl , author Oliver G. \ Schmidt , et al....

    2015

  44. [52]

    \ L \"o bl , author Giang N

    author author Liang \ Zhai , author Matthias C. \ L \"o bl , author Giang N. \ Nguyen , author Julian \ Ritzmann , author Alisa \ Javadi , author Clemens \ Spinnler , author Andreas D. \ Wieck , author Arne \ Ludwig , \ and\ author Richard J. \ Warburton ,\ title title Low-noi...

    2020

  45. [53]

    Nogajewski , author Ashish \ Arora , author V

    author author Maciej \ Koperski , author K. Nogajewski , author Ashish \ Arora , author V. Cherkez , author Paul \ Mallet , author J.-Y. \ Veuillen , author J. Marcus , author Piotr \ Kossacki , \ and\ author M Potemski ,\ title title Single photon emitters in exfoliated WSe\(...

    2015

  46. [54]

    author author Benito \ Al \'e n , author Jos \'e \ Bosch , author Daniel \ Granados , author Juan \ Mart \' nez-Pastor , author Jorge M \ Garc \' a , \ and\ author Luisa \ Gonz \'a lez ,\ title title Oscillator strength reduction induced by external electric fields in self-ass...

    2007

  47. [55]

    author author Fabian \ Cadiz , author Emmanuel \ Courtade , author C \'e dric \ Robert , author Gang \ Wang , author Yuxia \ Shen , author Hui \ Cai , author Takashi \ Taniguchi , author Kenji \ Watanabe , author Helene \ Carrere , author Delphine \ Lagarde , et al. ,\ title t...

    2017

  48. [56]

    \ Chow , author Hongyi \ Yu , author Aaron M

    author author Colin M. \ Chow , author Hongyi \ Yu , author Aaron M. \ Jones , author Jiaqiang \ Yan , author David G. \ Mandrus , author Takashi \ Taniguchi , author Kenji \ Watanabe , author Wang \ Yao , \ and\ author Xiaodong \ Xu ,\ title title Unusual exciton--phonon inte...

    2017

  49. [57]

    author author Bahaa E. A. \ Saleh \ and\ author Malvin Carl \ Teich ,\ @noop title Fundamentals of photonics, 2 volume set \ ( publisher John Wiley & Sons ,\ year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019

  50. [58]

    \ Reiter , et al

    author author Yusuf \ Karli , author Florian \ Kappe , author Vikas \ Remesh , author Thomas K \ Bracht , author Julian \ M \"u nzberg , author Saimon \ Covre da Silva , author Tim \ Seidelmann , author Vollrath Martin \ Axt , author Armando \ Rastelli , author Doris E. \ Reit...

    2022

  51. [59]

    \ S \'a nchez-Royo , \ and\ author Brian D

    author author Santosh \ Kumar , author Mauro \ Brot \'o ns-Gisbert , author Rima \ Al-Khuzheyri , author Artur \ Branny , author Guillem \ Ballesteros-Garcia , author Juan F. \ S \'a nchez-Royo , \ and\ author Brian D. \ Gerardot ,\ title title Resonant laser spectroscopy of l...

    2016

  52. [60]

    author author Andres \ Castellanos-Gomez , author Michele \ Buscema , author Rianda \ Molenaar , author Vibhor \ Singh , author Laurens \ Janssen , author Herre S. J. \ Van Der Zant , \ and\ author Gary A. \ Steele ,\ title title Deterministic transfer of two-dimensional mater...

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.