Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 103 references

Ferroelectric Antiferromagnetic Lifting of Spin-Valley Degeneracy

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A proposed class of ferroelectric antiferromagnets simultaneously lifts spin and valley degeneracy, combining the spin polarization of altermagnets with the valley polarization of TP-symmetric antiferromagnets.

desk verdict A clean symmetry argument for spin-valley polarization in ferroelectric antiferromagnets, with a load-bearing assumption about magnetic order under sliding that the paper does not yet test. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.03368 v1 pith:A5WIDAXU submitted 2025-07-04 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Jiaqi Feng , Xiaodong Zhou , Jingyan Chen , Meiling Xu , Xiuxian Yang , Yinwei Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords ferroelectricantiferromagnetspin-valleypolarizationvalleyHalleffectNernstinterlayerslidingNb3I8altermagnetismBerrycurvature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes that layered antiferromagnets that are simultaneously ferroelectric—'FE-AFMs'—can spontaneously lift both spin and valley degeneracies, a combination neither conventional TP-symmetric antiferromagnets nor altermagnets achieve on their own. In these materials the two oppositely magnetized sublattices live in different layers and are not related by any symmetry operation, so spin-up and spin-down bands split across the whole Brillouin zone while the valleys at the two K points become nondegenerate. The central demonstration is bilayer Nb3I8, where first-principles calculations give spin splittings up to 123 meV in the valence band and 91 meV in the conduction band, valley splittings up to 93 meV, and Berry-curvature transport with a valley Hall conductivity of 1.8 e2/h and a valley Nernst conductivity of 0.9 alpha0 at 100 K. Because the spin polarization is layer-dependent and tied to the out-of-plane ferroelectric polarization, interlayer sliding tunes the effects and ferroelectric switching reverses them. If correct, this gives a single platform for antiferromagnetic spintronic and valleytronic devices.

What carries the argument

The central object is the TP-broken layered ferroelectric antiferromagnet, exemplified by AA-stacked bilayer Nb3I8 with a breathing kagome lattice and A-type antiferromagnetism. In this phase the two antiparallel spin sublattices are not connected by any symmetry operation, so both spin degeneracy and valley degeneracy are lifted; the out-of-plane ferroelectric polarization makes the spin polarization layer-dependent. The Berry curvature concentrated around the two K valleys, computed from Wannier-based tight-binding Hamiltonians, carries the transport response: opposite-sign curvature at the two valleys produces valley Hall and valley Nernst conductivities whose signs and magnitudes track interlayer sliding and ferroelectric switching.

What would settle it

Look at bilayer Nb3I8 with spin- and angle-resolved photoemission or spin-polarized scanning tunneling spectroscopy: if the valence and conduction bands remain spin-degenerate or the spin-resolved density of states is fully compensated, the central claim fails. Alternatively, a transport measurement of the valley Hall or Nernst signal under ferroelectric switching should show a sign reversal; if neither response changes sign or magnitude with sliding or polarization reversal, the predicted Berry-curvature control is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that time-reversal-parity-broken ferroelectric antiferromagnets combine the spin-polarized band structure of altermagnets with the valley-polarized band structure of TP-symmetric antiferromagnets, while also having an uncompensated spin density of states despite zero net magnetization. The mechanism is demonstrated for AA-stacked bilayer Nb3I8, whose breathing kagome lattice gives out-of-plane ferroelectric polarization and whose A-type antiferromagnetic order leaves the two spin sublattices inequivalent. Because the sublattices occupy different layers, the spin splitting is layer-dependent and follows the out-of-plane polarization; reversing the stacking reverses the spin states and the valley transport signs. The paper further shows that interlayer sliding continuously tunes the splittings and the Berry-curvature hotspots, with the conduction-band valley splitting reversing sign as the dominant layer contribution changes. These features extend to a family of TP-broken bilayers: Nb3X8 (Cl, Br, I), VX2 (S, Se), and VSi2X4 (N, P).

Load-bearing premise

The picture assumes the bilayer keeps its fully compensated A-type antiferromagnetic order through every interlayer shift, and that the standard Hubbard U corrections used in the calculations are accurate; if sliding changes the magnetic order or the corrections change the band splittings, the predicted magnitudes and switching behavior would shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Bilayer Nb3I8 and similar FE-AFMs display spontaneous, global spin splitting without net magnetization, making them usable as antiferromagnetic spin sources that do not produce stray magnetic fields.
  • Interlayer sliding tunes the spin and valley splittings continuously, and switching the ferroelectric state reverses the signs of the valley Hall and valley Nernst conductivities.
  • The effective magnetic field implied by the spin splitting reaches about 1062 T at the valence band and 786 T at the conduction band, large enough to matter for spin transport.
  • Valley-selective transport reaches about 1.8 e2/h and 0.9 alpha0 at 100 K with electron doping, comparable to or larger than known two-dimensional ferromagnets.
  • The same mechanism is predicted in the Nb3X8, VX2, and VSi2X4 families, suggesting a general design recipe: stack ferrovalley monolayers antiferromagnetically with broken TP symmetry.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The layer-resolved spin polarization suggests a route to electric-field-driven spin-valley memory: since polarization reversal flips the layer contributions, a vertical field could switch the sign of the spin splitting and the valley currents without moving the Neel vector.
  • The uncompensated spin DOS in a zero-magnetization magnet is a distinguishing signature that could be searched for with spin- and angle-resolved photoemission on cleaved Nb3I8 bilayers.
  • A natural extension is to test whether the same TP-broken stacking in other compensated magnets, especially those with heavier elements and stronger spin-orbit coupling, pushes the valley splitting and Berry-curvature transport beyond the values reported here.
  • The Mott-relation link between sigma_xy and alpha_xy means the near-zero Nernst response at one valley is a checkable prediction: a measurement of that valley's anomalous Nernst signal would directly probe the energy derivative of its Hall conductivity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that TP-broken layered ferroelectric antiferromagnets (FE-AFMs) combine altermagnet-like global spin splitting with TP-AFM-like valley splitting. Using DFT+U and Wannier-based transport calculations, the authors focus on bilayer Nb3I8 and show spin splittings up to 123 meV (valence) and 91 meV (conduction), valley splittings up to 93 meV, and valley Hall and Nernst conductivities that reverse sign under ferroelectric switching or interlayer sliding. The same mechanism is claimed for a broader family (Nb3X8, VX2, VSi2X4). The symmetry argument is clean, but the numerical predictions rest on the assumption that the A-type AFM state remains the ground state at every interlayer shift, which is not tested against competing magnetic orders or Hubbard-U variations.

Significance. If the predictions hold, this is a useful conceptual advance: it identifies a concrete symmetry setting in which antiferromagnets can simultaneously exhibit spin polarization in the band structure and valley polarization, with an intrinsic ferroelectric sliding knob. The quantitative predictions (123 meV spin splitting, 93 meV valley splitting, σxy = 1.8 e²/h, αxy = 0.9 α₀) are specific and falsifiable, and the computational workflow is standard and transparent. The main significance depends on the magnetic ground state remaining A-type AFM across the entire sliding path, which is exactly the point that lacks direct evidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [II, Fig. S4 and Fig. 4] The slidetronics scenario is computed only in the A-type AFM state: Fig. S4 reports stacking energies along the [100] and [1-10] directions with no comparison to ferromagnetic, nonmagnetic, or other AFM orders, and no magnetic-moment or U-convergence checks are given. Since the central claim is that the spin-valley splittings and sign-reversible VHE/VNE in Fig. 4 occur along an equilibrium sliding path, the calculations must show that the A-type AFM state remains the ground state at each fractional shift. Without such a comparison, the reported transport values may be properties of metastable states and the sign switching would not occur on the adiabatic path.
  2. [Appendix A, Eqs. (A1)-(A4)] The Hubbard parameters are fixed to U_eff = 3.0 eV for Nb, 3.0 eV for V, 5.0 eV for Mn, and U = 5.1 eV, J = 0.8 eV for V2Se2O, but no U dependence is reported for the spin splittings, valley splittings, Berry curvature, or transport coefficients. In correlated d-electron systems these quantities can vary strongly with U; a U sweep or a benchmark against experiment for Nb3I8 is needed to establish that the claimed magnitudes and the sign-reversal behavior are robust rather than artifacts of a particular choice.
  3. [Abstract and Appendix B, Fig. S2] The abstract claims demonstration in a broad class (Nb3X8 with X = Cl, Br, I; VX2 with X = S, Se; VSi2X4 with X = N, P), but explicit calculations are shown only for Nb3I8, VS2, and VSi2N4. VSe2 and VSi2P4 are asserted to behave similarly without calculation, and no transport or band-structure results are presented for VS2 and VSi2N4 beyond spin-splitting curves. The universality claim is stronger than the presented evidence.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (4)] The Mott-relation expression appears to omit the factor 1/e: the standard low-temperature form is αxy = -(π² k_B² T)/(3e) σxy'(ε), whereas Eq. (4) lacks 1/e.
  2. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors, including 'camparable' in Section II, 'valance' in the Fig. 3 caption, and 'seeing' in the text near Fig. 3. The phrase 'T Psymmetry' should be 'TP symmetry'.
  3. [Section II, Eq. (2)] The 'effective magnetic field' Beff is a relabeling of the computed spin splitting rather than an independently predicted field; the values 1062 T and 786 T should be described as equivalent Zeeman fields, not as new physical magnetic fields.
  4. [Appendix B, Fig. S4] The stacking-energy curves show local extrema at n/4 and n/6 shifts, but the paper does not state whether these extrema are minima, maxima, or saddle points, nor does it report energy barriers for the sliding path. A brief clarification of the barrier heights would strengthen the slidetronics discussion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: splittings, Berry curvatures, and conductivities are first-principles outputs; Eq. (2) is a unit conversion, and the only self-citations supply Hubbard U values.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is genuinely first-principles. The central claim that TP-broken FE-AFMs exhibit global spin splitting and valley splitting is based on a symmetry analysis (magnetic point group 3m'1 with the two spin sublattices unrelated by any symmetry operation) plus DFT+U band structures, Wannier interpolation, and Kubo-formula transport calculations. The spin and valley splittings, the Berry curvature hot spots, and the resulting valley Hall and valley Nernst conductivities are all direct outputs of these calculations; no parameter is fitted to reproduce the claimed splittings or conductivities. Equation (2), Beff = Delta_E/(gs mu_B sigma_z), is a unit conversion from the already computed splitting to an effective Zeeman field, and it is not used as an input to generate any prediction. The only self-citations (Refs. [50] and [81]) are used in Appendix A to justify the choice of Hubbard U values (3.0 eV); these are parameter choices rather than load-bearing evidence for the physics, and they do not reduce any output to an input. The assumption that the A-type antiferromagnetic state remains the ground state for every interlayer shift is a robustness/correctness concern, not a circularity: the paper explicitly reports stacking energies only in the antiferromagnetic state, but that is an omitted phase-search limitation rather than a self-referential derivation. No equation or fitting step in the paper is equivalent by construction to its claimed result.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on DFT+U calculations with literature Hubbard U values and on the persistence of a specific magnetic order during sliding. No new particles, forces, or fundamental entities are introduced; the FE-AFM label is a materials classification.

free parameters (4)
  • Hubbard U_eff for Nb 4d in Nb3I8 = 3.0 eV
    GGA+U parameter taken from ref [81]; the reported spin and valley splittings depend on this value, and no U-sweep is shown.
  • Hubbard U_eff for V 3d in VS2 and VSi2N4 = 3.0 eV
    Taken from refs [49,50]; affects band-edge energies and splittings in the supporting materials.
  • Hubbard U for Mn 3d in MnPSe3 = 5.0 eV
    Used for the reference TP-AFM; only contextual, not central to the FE-AFM claim.
  • Hubbard U and J for V 3d in V2Se2O = U=5.1 eV, J=0.8 eV
    Used for the reference altermagnet V2Se2O; contextual only.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption GGA-PBE plus Hubbard U correctly describes the electronic structure and Berry curvature of these correlated layered magnets.
    All band structures and transport coefficients come from Kohn-Sham DFT+U; no self-energy or excitonic corrections are applied (Appendix A).
  • domain assumption The A-type antiferromagnetic state with fully compensated moments is the ground state and remains stable under all studied interlayer shifts.
    Stacking energies (Fig. S4) are evaluated only inside the AFM state; competing magnetic orders are not tested at intermediate stackings.
  • standard math The magnetic point group 3m'1 and the absence of any symmetry operation relating the two sublattices are correctly assigned for AA-stacked Nb3I8.
    This symmetry premise is the reason spin degeneracy is lifted globally; it is stated in Sec. II but not given a full group-theory proof.
  • domain assumption Wannier interpolation with 8x8x1 k-points and Kubo transport with 501x501 k-points faithfully reproduces the DFT band structure and Berry curvature.
    No convergence check of Wannier fits or transport integrals against direct DFT bands is shown (Appendix A).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ferroelectric Antiferromagnetic Lifting of Spin-Valley Degeneracy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/A5WIDAXU

@misc{pith2026250703368,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ferroelectric Antiferromagnetic Lifting of Spin-Valley Degeneracy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/A5WIDAXU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.03368}
}
read the original abstract

The generation and control of spin- and valley-polarization in antiferromagnets (AFMs) have garnered increasing attention due to their potential for enabling faster and more stable multifunctional spintronic and valleytronic memory and logic devices. However, the two primary categories of AFMs, altermagnets and TP-symmetric AFMs, either lack intrinsic valley-polarization or net spin-polarization. Here, we propose an effective approach for achieving spontaneous spin-valley polarization in TP-broken layered ferroelectric antiferromagnets (FE-AFMs). The FE-AFMs exhibit lifted spin degeneracy across the entire Brillouin zone, along with uncompensated spin density of states. They combine the benefits of spin-polarization in altermagnets with valley-polarization in TP-symmetric AFMs. Furthermore, the FE-AFMs feature layer-dependent spin-polarization, rooted in their intrinsic ferroelectric property, allowing for the flexible control over spin-valley polarization by interlayer sliding. This tunability facilitates sign-reversible and size-tunable valley Hall and Nernst effects, along with other spin-valley-dependent transport properties. Our findings are demonstrated in a broad class of TP-broken bilayer antiferromagnets such as Nb3X8 (X = Cl, Br, I), VX2 (X = S, Se), and VSi2X4 (X = N, P), underscoring the potential of FE-AFMs for advancing next-generation spin- and valley-based information technologies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.03368 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (Color online) Schematic illustration of spin-valley [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (Color online) Spin-valley characteristics in three [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (Color online) Slidetronic Spin-Valley Polarization and Ferroelectric Polarization. (a-d) Spin-splitting, valley-splitting, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (Color online) Sign-Reversible and Size-Tunable VHE and VNE. (a) and (d) Valley-resolved [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [100]

    In addition to the stacking energy, the spin and valley polarizations can also be effectively modulated by interlayer sliding

    ([1¯10]) direction. In addition to the stacking energy, the spin and valley polarizations can also be effectively modulated by interlayer sliding. To clearly illustrate the change of spin-splitting, we de- fine two quantities, i.e., △Ec(v) spin = Ec(v) ↑ − Ec(v) ↓ , which describe the nonrelativistic spin-splitting between the first and the second conduct...

  2. [1]

    ˇZuti´ c, J

    I. ˇZuti´ c, J. Fabian, and S. D. Sarma, Spintronics: Fun- damentals and Applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 323 (2004)

    2004

  3. [2]

    3(c)], indicating a positive correlation between spin-polarization and ferro- electric polarization

    and [1 ¯10] directions [seeing Fig. 3(c)], indicating a positive correlation between spin-polarization and ferro- electric polarization. Additionally, the calculated maxi- mum spin-splitting reaches up to 123 meV and 91 meV for valence and conduction bands, respectively. This FMs-like spin-splitting can be quantified as an analogue to the Zeeman effect. T...

  4. [3]

    3(i)-3(l)

    and [1 ¯10] directions with the corresponding band structures shown in Fig. 3(i)-3(l). Both the conduction and valence band valley splittings exhibit clear variations as a function of interlayer sliding, reflecting the strong coupling between electronic structure and layer stacking. However, their responses differ in both magnitude and sign behavior. Whil...

  5. [4]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous Hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1539 (2010)

    2010

  6. [5]

    Chappert, A

    C. Chappert, A. Fert, and F. N. Van Dau, The Emer- gence of Spin Electronics in Data Storage, Nat. Mater. 6, 813 (2007)

    2007

  7. [6]

    Y. Yao, L. Kleinman, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, D.-S. Wang, E. Wang, and Q. Niu, First Principles Calculation of Anomalous Hall Conductivity in Ferromagnetic bcc Fe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 037204 (2004)

    2004

  8. [7]

    Ebert, Magneto-Optical Effects in Transition Metal Systems, Rep

    H. Ebert, Magneto-Optical Effects in Transition Metal Systems, Rep. Prog. Phys. 59, 1665 (1996)

    1996

Show all 103 references
  1. [8]

    Sinova, S

    J. Sinova, S. O. Valenzuela, J. Wunderlich, C. H. Back, and T. Jungwirth, Spin Hall effects, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1213 (2015)

    2015

  2. [9]

    Zhou, R.-W

    X. Zhou, R.-W. Zhang, X. Yang, X.-P. Li, W. Feng, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Disorder- and Topology- Enhanced Fully Spin-Polarized Currents in Nodal Chain Spin-Gapless Semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 097201 (2022)

    2022

  3. [10]

    X. Zhou, W. Feng, X. Yang, G.-Y. Guo, and Y. Yao, Crystal Chirality Magneto-Optical Effects in Collinear Antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 104, 024401 (2021)

    2021

  4. [11]

    Feng, G.-Y

    W. Feng, G.-Y. Guo, J. Zhou, Y. Yao, and Q. Niu, Large Magneto-Optical Kerr Effect in Noncollinear An- tiferromagnets Mn 3X (X = Rh, Ir Pt), Phys. Rev. B 92, 144426 (2015)

    2015

  5. [12]

    Zhou, J.-P

    X. Zhou, J.-P. Hanke, W. Feng, F. Li, G.-Y. Guo, Y. Yao, S. Bl¨ ugel, and Y. Mokrousov, Spin-order De- pendent Anomalous Hall Effect and Magneto-Optical Effect in the Noncollinear Antiferromagnets Mn 3XN with X = Ga, Zn, Ag, or Ni, Phys. Rev. B 99, 104428 (2019)

    2019

  6. [13]

    A. Bose, N. J. Schreiber, R. Jain, D.-F. Shao, H. P. Nair, J. Sun, X. S. Zhang, D. A. Muller, E. Y. Tsymbal, D. G. Schlom, et al., Tilted Spin Current Generated by the Collinear Antiferromagnet Ruthenium Dioxide, Nat. Electron. 5, 267 (2022)

    2022

  7. [14]

    ˇZelezn´ y, P

    J. ˇZelezn´ y, P. Wadley, K. Olejn ´ ık, A. Hoffmann, and H. Ohno, Spin Transport and Spin Torque in Antiferro- magnetic Devices, Nat. Phys. 14, 220 (2018)

    2018

  8. [15]

    Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K

    R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K. V´ yborn´ y, Y. Ya- hagi, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and J. ˇZelezn´ y, Effi- cient Electrical Spin Splitter Based on Nonrelativistic Collinear Antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 127701 (2021)

    2021

  9. [16]

    Karube, T

    S. Karube, T. Tanaka, D. Sugawara, N. Kadoguchi, M. Kohda, and J. Nitta, Observation of Spin-Splitter Torque in Collinear Antiferromagnetic RuO 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 137201 (2022)

    2022

  10. [17]

    H. Bai, L. Han, X. Y. Feng, Y. J. Zhou, R. X. Su, Q. Wang, L. Y. Liao, W. X. Zhu, X. Z. Chen, F. Pan, X. L. Fan, and C. Song, Observation of Spin Split- ting Torque in a Collinear Antiferromagnet RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 197202 (2022)

    2022

  11. [18]

    H. Bai, Y. C. Zhang, Y. J. Zhou, P. Chen, C. H. Wan, L. Han, W. X. Zhu, S. X. Liang, Y. C. Su, X. F. Han, F. Pan, and C. Song, Efficient Spin-to-Charge Conver- sion via Altermagnetic Spin Splitting Effect in Antifer- romagnet RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 216701 (2023)

    2023

  12. [19]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. B. Hellenes, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Giant and Tunneling Magnetoresistance in Unconventional Collinear Antifer- romagnets with Nonrelativistic Spin-Momentum Cou- pling, Phys. Rev. X 12, 011028 (2022)

    2022

  13. [20]

    Shao, Y.-Y

    D.-F. Shao, Y.-Y. Jiang, J. Ding, S.-H. Zhang, Z.-A. Wang, R.-C. Xiao, G. Gurung, W. Lu, Y. Sun, and E. Y. Tsymbal, N´ eel Spin Currents in Antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 216702 (2023)

    2023

  14. [21]

    Shao, S.-H

    D.-F. Shao, S.-H. Zhang, M. Li, C.-B. Eom, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Spin-Neutral Currents for Spintronics, Nat. Commun. 12, 7061 (2021)

    2021

  15. [22]

    K. F. Mak, D. Xiao, and J. Shan, Light-Valley Inter- actions in 2D Semiconductors, Nat. Photonics 12, 451 (2018)

    2018

  16. [23]

    X. Xu, W. Yao, D. Xiao, and T. F. Heinz, Spin and Pseudospins in Layered Transition Metal Dichalco- genides, Nat. Phys. 10, 343 (2014)

    2014

  17. [24]

    J. R. Schaibley, H. Yu, G. Clark, P. Rivera, J. S. Ross, K. L. Seyler, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Valleytronics in 2D Materials, Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16055 (2016)

    2016

  18. [25]

    J. Lee, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Electrical Control of the Valley Hall Effect in Bilayer MoS2 Transistors, Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 421 (2016)

    2016

  19. [26]

    D. Xiao, W. Yao, and Q. Niu, Valley-Contrasting Physics in Graphene: Magnetic Moment and Topologi- cal Transport, Phys. Rev. Lett 99, 236809 (2007)

    2007

  20. [27]

    Xiao, G.-B

    D. Xiao, G.-B. Liu, W. Feng, X. Xu, and W. Yao, Coupled Spin and Valley Physics in Monolayers of MoS2 and Other Group-VI Dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett 108, 196802 (2012)

    2012

  21. [28]

    Tong, S.-J

    W.-Y. Tong, S.-J. Gong, X. Wan, and C.-G. Duan, Concepts of Ferrovalley Material and Anomalous Valley Hall Effect, Nat. Commun. 7, 13612 (2016)

    2016

  22. [29]

    Yu, Z.-G

    X.-Q. Yu, Z.-G. Zhu, G. Su, and A. P. Jauho, Thermally Driven Pure Spin and Valley Currents via the Anoma- lous Nernst Effect in Monolayer Group-VI Dichalco- genides, Phys. Rev. Lett 115, 246601 (2015)

    2015

  23. [30]

    M. T. Dau, C. Vergnaud, A. Marty, C. Beign´ e, S. Gam- barelli, V. Maurel, T. Journot, B. Hyot, T. Guillet, B. Gr´ evin, H. Okuno, and M. Jamet, The Valley Nernst Effect in WSe 2, Nat. Commun. 10, 5796 (2019)

    2019

  24. [31]

    Baltz, A

    V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y. Tserkovnyak, Antiferromagnetic Spintronics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015005 (2018)

    2018

  25. [32]

    ˇSmejkal, Y

    L. ˇSmejkal, Y. Mokrousov, B. Yan, and A. H. MacDon- ald, Topological Antiferromagnetic Spintronics, Nat. Phys. 14, 242 (2018)

    2018

  26. [33]

    Jungwirth, J

    T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, A. Manchon, X. Marti, J. Wun- derlich, and C. Felser, The Multiple Directions of An- tiferromagnetic Spintronics, Nat. Phys. 14, 200 (2018)

    2018

  27. [34]

    X. Zhou, W. Feng, R.-W. Zhang, L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Crystal Thermal Transport in Altermagnetic RuO 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 056701 (2024)

    2024

  28. [35]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond Con- ventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  29. [36]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging Re- search Landscape of Altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022). 10

    2022

  30. [37]

    X. Li, T. Cao, Q. Niu, J. Shi, and J. Feng, Coupling the Valley Degree of Freedom to Antiferromagnetic Order, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 110, 3738 (2013)

    2013

  31. [38]

    L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. ˇSmejkal, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Altermagnetism: Exploring New Frontiers in Magnetism and Spintronics, Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2409327 (2024)

    2024

  32. [39]

    Y. Liu, J. Yu, and C.-C. Liu, Twisted Magnetic Van der Waals Bilayers: An Ideal Platform for Altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 206702 (2024)

    2024

  33. [40]

    Zhang, C

    R.-W. Zhang, C. Cui, R. Li, J. Duan, L. Li, Z.-M. Yu, and Y. Yao, Predictable Gate-Field Control of Spin in Altermagnets with Spin-Layer Coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 056401 (2024)

    2024

  34. [41]

    Sivadas, S

    N. Sivadas, S. Okamoto, and D. Xiao, Gate- Controllable Magneto-Optic Kerr Effect in Layered Collinear Antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 267203 (2016)

    2016

  35. [42]

    H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional Antiferromagnetic Materi- als with Giant Piezomagnetism and Noncollinear Spin Current, Nat. Commun. 12, 2846 (2021)

    2021

  36. [43]

    R. Peng, Y. Ma, X. Xu, Z. He, B. Huang, and Y. Dai, Intrinsic Anomalous Valley Hall Effect in Single-Layer Nb3I8, Phys. Rev. B 102, 035412 (2020)

    2020

  37. [44]

    Li and M

    L. Li and M. Wu, Binary Compound Bilayer and Mul- tilayer with Vertical Polarizations: Two-Dimensional Ferroelectrics, Multiferroics, and Nanogenerators, ACS nano 11, 6382 (2017)

    2017

  38. [45]

    Sivadas, S

    N. Sivadas, S. Okamoto, X. Xu, C. J. Fennie, and D. Xiao, Stacking-Dependent Magnetism in Bilayer CrI3, Nano Lett. 18, 7658 (2018)

    2018

  39. [46]

    L. Feng, X. Chen, and J. Qi, Nonvolatile Electric Field Control of Spin-Valley-Layer Polarized Anomalous Hall Effect in a Two-Dimensional Multiferroic Semiconduc- tor Bilayer, Phys. Rev. B 108, 115407 (2023)

    2023

  40. [47]

    Conte, D

    F. Conte, D. Ninno, and G. Cantele, Layer-Dependent Electronic and Magnetic Properties of Nb 3I8, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033001 (2020)

    2020

  41. [48]

    Cantele, F

    G. Cantele, F. Conte, L. Zullo, and D. Ninno, Tun- able Electronic and Magnetic Properties of Thin Nb 3I8 Nanofilms: Interplay between Strain and Thickness, Phys. Rev. B 106, 085418 (2022)

    2022

  42. [49]

    X. Liu, A. P. Pyatakov, and W. Ren, Magnetoelectric Coupling in Multiferroic Bilayer VS 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 247601 (2020)

    2020

  43. [50]

    Feng and Q

    Y. Feng and Q. Yang, Enabling Triferroics Coupling in Breathing Kagome Lattice Nb 3X8 (X = Cl, Br, I) Monolayers, J. Mater. Chem. C 11, 5762 (2023)

    2023

  44. [51]

    J. Duan, D. Ma, R. Zhang, W. Jiang, Z. Zhang, C. Cui, Z. Yu, and Y. Yao, Cataloging High-Quality Two- Dimensional Van Der Waals Materials with Flat Bands, Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2313067 (2024)

    2024

  45. [52]

    S. Li, Q. Wang, C. Zhang, P. Guo, and S. A. Yang, Correlation-Driven Topological and Valley States in Monolayer VSi2P4, Phys. Rev. B 104, 085149 (2021)

    2021

  46. [53]

    Zhou, R.-W

    X. Zhou, R.-W. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Feng, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Sign-Reversible Valley- Dependent Berry Phase Effects in 2D Valley-Half- Semiconductors, npj Comput. Mater. 7, 160 (2021)

    2021

  47. [54]

    Q. Cui, Y. Zhu, J. Liang, P. Cui, and H. Yang, Spin- Valley Coupling in a Two-Dimensional VSi 2N4 Mono- layer, Phys. Rev. B. 103, 085421 (2021)

    2021

  48. [55]

    J. Hong, F. Sui, K. Wang, X. Han, Y. Zheng, W.- Y. Tong, X. Deng, Z. Guan, B. Tian, and et al, Coexistence of Chiral Phonons and Antiferroelectricity in Breathing Kagome Semiconductor Nb 3I8 at Room- Temperature, (2023), https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs- 3457733/v1

    2023 doi

  49. [56]

    X. Feng, X. Xu, Z. He, R. Peng, Y. Dai, B. Huang, and Y. Ma, Valley-Related Multiple Hall Effect in Monolayer VSi2P4, Phys. Rev. B 104, 075421 (2021)

    2021

  50. [57]

    Jiang, Q

    J. Jiang, Q. Liang, R. Meng, Q. Yang, C. Tan, X. Sun, and X. Chen, Exploration of New Ferromagnetic, Semi- conducting and Biocompatible Nb 3X 8 (X= Cl, Br or I) Monolayers with Considerable Visible and Infrared Light Absorption, Nanoscale 9, 2992 (2017)

    2017

  51. [58]

    D. Hu, H. Ye, N. Ding, K. Xu, S.-S. Wang, S. Dong, and X. Yao, Two-dimensional 5 d multiferroic W 3Cl8: Breathing kagome lattice and tunable magneto-optical Kerr effect, Phys. Rev. B 109, 014433 (2024)

    2024

  52. [59]

    S. Xing, B. Wang, T. Zhao, J. Zhou, and Z. Sun, Inde- pendent Electrical Control of Spin and Valley Degrees in 2D Breathing Kagome Ta3I8 with Intrinsic Triferroicity, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 15, 6489 (2024)

    2024

  53. [60]

    J. Lu, H. Chen, X. Zhao, G. Hu, X. Yuan, and J. Ren, Chiral breathing-valley locking in two-dimensional kagome lattice Ta3I8, Appl. Phys. Lett. 124, 072101 (2024)

    2024

  54. [61]

    L.-D. Yuan, A. B. Georgescu, and J. M. Rondinelli, Nonrelativistic Spin Splitting at the Brillouin Zone Cen- ter in Compensated Magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 216701 (2024)

    2024

  55. [62]

    Y. Liu, Y. Feng, Y. Dai, B. Huang, and Y. Ma, Ferro- Valleytricity with In-Plane Spin Magnetization, Nano Letters 25, 762 (2024)

    2024

  56. [63]

    Mazin (The PRX Editors), Editorial: Altermagnetism—A New Punch Line of Fundamental Magnetism, Phys

    I. Mazin (The PRX Editors), Editorial: Altermagnetism—A New Punch Line of Fundamental Magnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040002 (2022)

    2022

  57. [64]

    Guo, X.-Y

    P.-J. Guo, X.-Y. Hou, Z.-F. Gao, H.-C. Yang, W. Ji, and Z.-Y. Lu, Luttinger compensated bipolar- ized magnetic semiconductor, arXiv:2502.18136 (2025), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.18136

    2025 doi arXiv

  58. [65]

    Liu, S.-D

    Y. Liu, S.-D. Guo, Y. Li, and C.-C. Liu, Two- Dimensional Fully Compensated Ferrimagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 116703 (2025)

    2025

  59. [66]

    Guo, Valley polarization in two-dimensional zero- net-magnetization magnets, Appl

    S.-D. Guo, Valley polarization in two-dimensional zero- net-magnetization magnets, Appl. Phys. Lett. 126, 080502 (2025)

    2025

  60. [67]

    Chen, H.-P

    R. Chen, H.-P. Sun, M. Gu, C.-B. Hua, Q. Liu, H.-Z. Lu, and X. Xie, Layer Hall effect induced by hidden Berry curvature in antiferromagnetic insulators, Nat. Sci. Rev. 11, nwac140 (2024)

    2024

  61. [68]

    S. Du, P. Tang, J. Li, Z. Lin, Y. Xu, W. Duan, and A. Rubio, Berry curvature engineering by gating two-dimensional antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 022025 (2020)

    2020

  62. [69]

    Gao, Y.-F

    A. Gao, Y.-F. Liu, C. Hu, J.-X. Qiu, C. Tzschaschel, B. Ghosh, S.-C. Ho, D. B´ erub´ e, R. Chen, H. Sun, and et al, Layer Hall Effect in a 2D Topological Axion An- tiferromagnet, Nature 595, 521 (2021)

    2021

  63. [70]

    Jiang, L

    P. Jiang, L. Kang, H. Hao, X. Zheng, Z. Zeng, and S. Sanvito, Ferroelectric Control of Electron Half- Metallicity in A-type Antiferromagnets and its Applica- tion to Nonvolatile Memory Devices, Phys. Rev. B 102, 245417 (2020)

    2020

  64. [71]

    F. Yao, M. Liao, M. Gibertini, C.-Y. Cheon, X. Lin, F. Wu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, I. Guti´ errez- Lezama, and A. F. Morpurgo, Switching on and off the 11 spin polarization of the conduction band in antiferro- magnetic bilayer transistors, Nat. Nanotechnol. 20, 609 (2025)

    2025

  65. [72]

    S.-D. Guo, P. Li, and G. Wang, First-principles calcu- lations study of valley polarization in antiferromagnetic bilayer systems, Phys. Rev. B 111, l140404 (2025)

    2025

  66. [73]

    Guo and Y

    S.-D. Guo and Y. S. Ang, Spontaneous Spin Splitting in Electric Potential Difference Antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. B 108, l180403 (2023)

    2023

  67. [74]

    Y. Feng, Y. Dai, B. Huang, L. Kou, and Y. Ma, Layer Hall Effect in Multiferroic Two-Dimensional Materials, Nano Lett. 23, 5367 (2023)

    2023

  68. [75]

    Cao, D.-F

    T. Cao, D.-F. Shao, K. Huang, G. Gurung, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Switchable Anomalous Hall Effects in Polar- Stacked 2D Antiferromagnet MnBi 2Te4, Nano Letters 23, 3781 (2023)

    2023

  69. [76]

    Yamauchi, P

    K. Yamauchi, P. Barone, T. Shishidou, T. Oguchi, and S. Picozzi, Coupling Ferroelectricity with Spin-Valley Physics in Oxide-Based Heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 037602 (2015)

    2015

  70. [77]

    S.-D. Guo, W. Xu, Y. Xue, G. Zhu, and Y. S. Ang, Layer-Locked Anomalous Valley Hall Effect in a Two- Dimensional A-type Tetragonal Antiferromagnetic In- sulator, Phys. Rev. B 109, 134426 (2024)

    2024

  71. [78]

    W. Xun, C. Wu, H. Sun, W. Zhang, Y.-Z. Wu, and P. Li, Coexisting magnetism, ferroelectric, and ferroval- ley multiferroic in stacking-dependent two-dimensional materials, Nano letters 24, 3541 (2024)

    2024

  72. [79]

    Yananose, P

    K. Yananose, P. G. Radaelli, M. Cuoco, J. Yu, and A. Stroppa, Activating Magnetoelectric Optical Proper- ties by Twisting Antiferromagnetic Bilayers, Phys. Rev. B 106, 184408 (2022)

    2022

  73. [80]

    D. Xiao, Y. Yao, Z. Fang, and Q. Niu, Berry-Phase Effect in Anomalous Thermoelectric Transport, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 026603 (2006)

    2006

  74. [81]

    F.-R. Fan, H. Wu, D. Nabok, S. Hu, W. Ren, C. Draxl, and A. Stroppa, Electric-Magneto-Optical Kerr Ef- fect in a Hybrid Organic–Inorganic Perovskite, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 12883 (2017)

    2017

  75. [82]

    W. Sun, H. Ye, L. Liang, N. Ding, S. Dong, and S.- S. Wang, Stacking-Dependent Ferroicity of a Reversed Bilayer: Altermagnetism or Ferroelectricity, Phys. Rev. B 110, 224418 (2024)

    2024

  76. [83]

    N. Ding, K. Yananose, C. Rizza, F.-R. Fan, S. Dong, and A. Stroppa, Magneto-optical Kerr Effect in Ferroelectric Antiferromagnetic Two-dimensional Het- erostructures, ACS Appl. Mater. & Interfaces 15, 22282 (2023)

    2023

  77. [84]

    J. Feng, X. Zhou, M. Xu, J. Shi, and Y. Li, Layer Con- trol of Magneto-Optical Effects and Their Quantization in Spin-Valley Splitting Antiferromagnets, Nano Lett. 24, 3898 (2024)

    2024

  78. [85]

    X. Yang, X. Zhou, W. Feng, and Y. Yao, Tun- able Magneto-Optical Effect, Anomalous Hall Effect, and Anomalous Nernst Effect in the Two-Dimensional Room-Temperature Ferromagnet 1T-CrTe2, Phys. Rev. B. 103, 024436 (2021)

    2021

  79. [86]

    R.-C. Xiao, Y. Gao, H. Jiang, W. Gan, C. Zhang, and H. Li, Non-Synchronous Bulk Photovoltaic Effect in Two-Dimensional Interlayer-Sliding Ferroelectrics, npj Comput. Mater. 8, 138 (2022)

    2022

  80. [87]

    X. Yang, X. Zhou, W. Feng, and Y. Yao, Strong Magneto-Optical Effect and Anomalous Transport in the Two-Dimensional Van Der Waals Magnets FenGeTe2 (n = 3, 4, 5), Phys. Rev. B 104, 104427 (2021)

    2021

  81. [88]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficiency of Ab-initio Total Energy Calculations for Metals and Semiconduc- tors using a Plane-Wave Basis Set, Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15 (1996)

    1996

  82. [89]

    X. Yang, P. Yang, X. Zhou, W. Feng, and Y. Yao, First- and second-order magneto-optical effects and intrinsi- cally anomalous transport in the two-dimensional van der Waals layered magnets Cr XY (X = S , Se, Te;Y = Cl, Br, I), Phys. Rev. B 106, 054408 (2022)

    2022

  83. [90]

    X. Li, L. Xu, L. Ding, J. Wang, M. Shen, X. Lu, Z. Zhu, and K. Behnia, Anomalous Nernst and Righi-Leduc Ef- fects in Mn 3Sn : Berry Curvature and Entropy Flow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 056601 (2017)

    2017

  84. [91]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  85. [92]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient Iterative Schemes Forab InitioTotal-Energy Calculations Using a Plane-Wave Basis Set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  86. [93]

    P. E. Bl¨ ochl, Projector Augmented-Wave Method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  87. [94]

    Grimme, J

    S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, and H. Krieg, A Con- sistent and Accurate ab initio Parametrization of Den- sity Functional Dispersion Correction (DFT-D) for the 94 Elements H-Pu, J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010)

    2010

  88. [95]

    S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton, Electron-Energy-Loss Spectra and The Structural Stability of Nickel Oxide: An LSDA+U Study, Phys. Rev. B 57, 1505 (1998)

    1998

  89. [96]

    A. I. Liechtenstein, V. I. Anisimov, and J. Zaanen, Density-functional theory and strong interactions: Or- bital ordering in Mott-Hubbard insulators, Phys. Rev. B 52, R5467 (1995)

    1995

  90. [97]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Van- derbilt, and N. Marzari, Wannier90: A Tool for Obtain- ing Maximally-Localised Wannier Functions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 685 (2008)

    2008

  91. [98]

    Grimme, S

    S. Grimme, S. Ehrlich, and L. Goerigk, Effect of the Damping Function in Dispersion Corrected Density Functional Theory, J. Comput. Chem. 32, 1456 (2011)

    2011

  92. [99]

    V. Wang, N. Xu, J.-C. Liu, G. Tang, and W.-T. Geng, V ASPKIT: A User-Friendly Interface Facilitating High-Throughput Computing and Analysis using V ASP Code, Comput. Phys. Commun. 267, 108033 (2021)

    2021

  93. [101]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry Phase Ef- fects on Electronic Properties, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959 (2010)

    2010

  94. [102]

    Kubo, Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes

    R. Kubo, Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes. I. General Theory and Simple Applications to Magnetic and Conduction Problems, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 12, 570 (1957)

    1957

  95. [103]

    Feng, C.-C

    W. Feng, C.-C. Liu, G.-B. Liu, J.-J. Zhou, and Y. Yao, First-Principles Investigations on the Berry Phase Ef- fect in Spin–Orbit Coupling Materials, Comp. Mater. Sci 112, 428 (2016)

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.