Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Vacancy-free cubic superconducting NbN enabled by quantum anharmonicity

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Fully relaxed under quantum anharmonic motion, stoichiometric NbN distorts into a previously unreported cubic phase (P-43m) that is 65 meV/atom lower in free energy than ideal δ-NbN, with a predicted superconducting transition of 20 K.

desk verdict A genuinely new predicted P-43m phase in NbN with careful superconductivity work, but the 65 meV/atom ordering and the quantum-stabilization narrative rest on one MLIP and need a direct DFT check before I would call it established. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.03417 v1 pith:LPHMNTCD submitted 2025-07-04 cond-mat.supr-con

Eva Kogler , Mihir R. Sahoo , Chia-Nien Tsai , Fabian Jöbstl , Roman Lucrezi , Peter I. C. Cooke , Birgit Kunert , Roland Resel
show 5 more authors
Chris J. Pickard Matthew N. Julian Rohit P. Prasankumar Mahmoud I. Hussein Christoph Heil
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con PACS 74.20.-z74.25.Kc
keywords niobiumnitridesuperconductivityquantumanharmonicityzero-pointmotionP-43mcubicphasestochasticself-consistentharmonicapproximationmachine-learnedinteratomicpotentialsMigdal-Eliashbergtheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Niobium nitride (NbN) is a central material for superconducting applications, yet its standard cubic phase cannot exist at perfect 1:1 stoichiometry: the ideal rock-salt lattice is dynamically unstable, and every experimental sample requires nitrogen vacancies to hold it together. This paper argues that the missing ingredient in that picture is quantum anharmonicity — the zero-point motion of the ions and the non-parabolic shape of the potential they move in. When the lattice is fully relaxed with those effects included, the crystal distorts along its softest mode into a previously unreported cubic phase with space group $P\bar{4}3m$, 65 meV/atom lower in free energy than ideal $\delta$-NbN, and three independent computational methods converge on the same structure. The phase's predicted transition temperature of 20 K matches the measured value for near-stoichiometric NbN far better than earlier stabilization tricks, which gave 27 K. If the claim holds, it overturns the assumption that vacancies are required for cubic NbN and points to a vacancy-free 1:1 phase as a possible route to higher $T_c$.

What carries the argument

The mechanism that carries the argument is quantum anharmonicity — the combined effect of zero-point ionic motion and the non-parabolic shape of the potential energy surface — treated by letting the crystal relax inside the stochastic self-consistent harmonic approximation (SSCHA), which replaces the true ionic potential with an effective harmonic one while keeping the quantum fluctuations explicit. The pivotal object is the distortion itself: the $P\bar{4}3m$ arrangement is a linear combination of the eigenvectors of a threefold-degenerate zone-centre mode with $T_{1u}$ symmetry, the mode with the largest imaginary harmonic frequency (about $7.4i$ THz) in $\delta$-NbN. Because converged SSCHA and MD runs need hundreds of thousands of energy evaluations, a machine-learned interatomic potential trained on 100 DFT configurations of $\delta$-NbN supplies energies and forces with an RMSE of 0.6–0.7 meV/atom, accelerating the calculations by $10^4$–$10^5$. Agreement between SSCHA, MD spectral energy density, and the independent structure search is what turns the new phase from a single-method artefact into a robust claim.

What would settle it

A direct DFT-only SSCHA relaxation of the eight-atom $P\bar{4}3m$ cell would settle the ordering: if the 65 meV/atom stabilisation over $\delta$-NbN shrinks or reverses without the machine-learned potential, the phase is that potential's artefact. Experimentally, high-resolution X-ray or neutron diffraction on a near-stoichiometric, vacancy-controlled cubic NbN sample would test the structure directly: $P\bar{4}3m$ predicts weak superstructure reflections at the 100 and 110 positions, and the paper notes that only a faint 110 trace (and no 100 peak) has ever been reported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's claim, stated on its own terms, is that 1:1 stoichiometric cubic niobium nitride has a previously unrecognised quantum-mechanical ground state: the ideal rock-salt phase $Fm\bar{3}m$ is dynamically unstable even when quantum anharmonicity is included (SSCHA retains imaginary modes up to 300 K), but if the lattice is allowed to displace along the soft modes it settles into a distorted, non-centrosymmetric cubic structure with space group $P\bar{4}3m$ (Nb and N on 4e sites, $a = 4.421$ Å) whose free energy is 65 meV/atom below $\delta$-NbN. The same structure is reached by three independent routes — SSCHA full relaxation, molecular-dynamics spectral energy density, and a blind ab initio random structure search — and it still lies above the hexagonal $\epsilon$-NbN ground state. The distortion removes bands from the Fermi surface, lowering the electronic density of states and the electron-phonon coupling, so the Migdal-Eliashberg calculation with a GW-derived Coulomb pseudopotential gives $T_c = 20$ K, close to the experimental value of about 16 K for near-stoichiometric material and far better than the 27 K obtained by artificially smearing the Fermi surface. The conclusion is that nitrogen vacancies are not necessary to stabilise cubic NbN; a vacancy-free distorted cubic phase is thermodynamically preferred and may be a route to higher $T_c$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the machine-learned potential, trained on only 100 DFT snapshots of the unstable $\delta$ phase at 300 K, stays accurate in the fully relaxed $P\bar{4}3m$ basin, including the 65 meV/atom free-energy ordering, even though no direct DFT recheck of the SSCHA-relaxed $P\bar{4}3m$ free energy or phonons is reported.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The vacancy-free $P\bar{4}3m$ phase is thermodynamically preferred over ideal $\delta$-NbN by 65 meV/atom, so synthesis routes targeting perfect 1:1 stoichiometry should aim at this distorted cubic structure rather than at a vacancy-stabilized rock-salt lattice.
  • The $\delta$ phase remains dynamically unstable at perfect stoichiometry even with quantum anharmonicity (SSCHA imaginary modes up to 300 K), so the ideal rock-salt lattice cannot be the ground state of 1:1 NbN by itself.
  • A $T_c$ of 20 K computed with a GW-derived Coulomb pseudopotential is much closer to the experimental ~16 K of near-stoichiometric NbN than the 27 K from large-smearing harmonic treatments, implying that the smearing approximation overestimates electron-phonon coupling in this system.
  • Because measured $T_c$ rises as nitrogen vacancies are removed, the predicted vacancy-free endpoint could superconduct at a higher temperature than any NbN sample studied so far.
  • The identical full-relaxation treatment of TiN and NbC finds no such distortion, so the $P\bar{4}3m$ instability is specific to NbN rather than a generic feature of the method.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the $P\bar{4}3m$ phase is real, it has a cheap experimental fingerprint: weak superstructure reflections at the 100 and 110 positions, and the paper itself notes that only a faint 110 trace (with no 100 peak) has ever been reported in high-pressure data; re-examining vacancy-controlled cubic samples with high-resolution diffraction could test the phase without new synthesis routes.
  • Because the relaxed cell has only eight atoms, a direct DFT-only SSCHA recheck of the $P\bar{4}3m$ basin is a plausible near-term test that would remove the machine-learning layer from the argument and settle the 65 meV/atom ordering.
  • The same full-relaxation protocol could be applied to other transition-metal nitrides and carbides with harmonic instabilities (for example TaN or MoN variants); the authors' TiN and NbC negative controls suggest the mechanism is not universal, so each material would need its own test.
  • The non-centrosymmetric $P\bar{4}3m$ structure lacks inversion symmetry, so if it can be stabilized in films it may display effects the centrosymmetric $\delta$ phase cannot, such as spin-orbit splitting of electronic states; the paper does not explore these.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a first-principles study of stoichiometric cubic NbN. Using SSCHA with a machine-learned interatomic potential (MTP) trained on DFT data, the authors find that quantum anharmonic relaxation of δ-Fm-3m NbN leads to a previously unreported cubic P-43m structure with a free energy 65 meV/atom lower than δ-NbN. The anharmonic phonon dispersion from SSCHA agrees with MD-SED spectral density, and AIRSS/shaken-fcc DFT relaxations also locate the same structure. Electron-phonon coupling from SSCHA phonons and a GW-derived μ*=0.21 yields Tc≈20 K, closer to experimental near-stoichiometric values than the 27 K obtained with large-smearing harmonic δ-NbN. The authors interpret these results as evidence that quantum anharmonicity can stabilize vacancy-free cubic NbN, challenging the assumption that vacancies are structurally necessary.

Significance. If correct, the result is significant: it identifies a concrete vacancy-free cubic phase, provides a falsifiable diffraction signature, and gives a testable Tc prediction. Strengths include the use of conceptually complementary methods (SSCHA and MD-SED), the MTP validation showing 0.6–0.7 meV/atom energy RMSE, the GW-based μ*, and the explicit check that TiN and NbC do not undergo the same distortion. However, the central structural prediction currently rests on a small MTP training set and on validation sets generated by the MTP itself, so a direct DFT re-evaluation is needed before the quantitative free-energy ordering can be considered secure.

major comments (4)
  1. [Methods – MTP; SI S7] The central claim of a 65 meV/atom free-energy lowering rests on SSCHA calculations performed with an MTP trained on only 100 DFT configurations around δ-NbN at 300 K. The validation in SI S7 draws 100 configurations from the final, MTP-generated SSCHA population at 15 K; this confirms self-consistency on the MTP's own sampling distribution but cannot rule out a systematic bias in the P-43m basin or in the anharmonic curvature near it. A direct DFT check of the SSCHA-relaxed P-43m structure—at minimum DFT total energies and forces for a few representative SSCHA configurations, or a DFT-SSCHA free-energy re-evaluation—is required to support the 65 meV/atom ordering and the stabilization narrative.
  2. [Methods – MD simulations and SED calculations] The MD-SED simulation is set up with a unit-cell lattice parameter a = 4.482262 Å, while the DFT-relaxed P-43m structure has a = 4.421 Å (SI S1). The MD-SED run is therefore not a test of the same volume as the SSCHA/DFT structure, and the paper should show that the P-43m distortion also emerges at the DFT lattice constant, or discuss the sensitivity of the result to this volume mismatch. Because MD-SED uses classical molecular dynamics, it also does not by itself demonstrate quantum stabilization, despite the quantum anharmonicity emphasized in the title.
  3. [Results – 'three independent and conceptually distinct methods'; Methods – AIRSS] The AIRSS confirmation is not fully independent because the EDDP training set explicitly included the P-43m structure as a marker. While the direct DFT relaxations of shaken fcc supercells (Tables S2/S3) provide independent evidence, the text should distinguish these two levels of support and report whether any EDDP-relaxed structures would have found P-43m without the marker. The claim of three independent methods should be softened or qualified accordingly.
  4. [SI Fig. S4; Results] The harmonic phonon calculation for the relaxed P-43m structure still shows imaginary modes in a narrow region around Γ. The phrase 'dynamically stable' is therefore only meaningful within SSCHA (i.e., after including zero-point renormalization), and the residual harmonic instability makes the result particularly sensitive to the MTP's description of the low-curvature region near Γ. The paper should state this explicitly and, ideally, verify the small imaginary region with direct DFPT calculations on the SSCHA-relaxed geometry.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction] The phrase 'beyond the Born-Oppenheimer approximation' is imprecise; the calculations remain on the Born-Oppenheimer surface and the intended meaning is 'beyond the harmonic approximation'.
  2. [Methods – MTP] The parameter 'level 26' is not defined; please explain it or give a reference to the MLIP package documentation.
  3. [SI Fig. S9 caption] The caption contains a typo: 'side lenght' should be 'side length'.
  4. [Results – Note on TiN and NbC] The sentence 'f ccphases' contains a spacing typo and should read 'fcc phases'.
  5. [Results – Tc comparison] Describing Tc = 20 K as 'aligned closely' with the quoted experimental value of about 16 K overstates the agreement for a 25% difference; suggest 'in reasonable agreement' or a similar more neutral formulation.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The P-43m phase itself is not a fitted prediction, but the claimed 'independent' AIRSS confirmation is partly circular because P-43m was inserted as a training marker, and the SSCHA/MD-SED cross-check shares a single machine-learned potential.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Methods, AIRSS; Results and Discussion, 'three independent methods' paragraph]
    "In addition, 'marker' structures of known low energy NbxNy structures were 'shaken' and added to the dataset, including the P ¯43m structure. ... The consistent identification of the P ¯43m phase by three independent and conceptually distinct methods — SSCHA, MD, and AIRSS — provides compelling evidence that this structure represents the true quantum-mechanical ground state of stoichiometric cubic NbN."

    The AIRSS/EDDP search is presented as one of three independent confirmations of P-43m, but the P-43m structure itself was explicitly included as a marker in the EDDP training dataset. The search's 'identification' of P-43m is therefore partly an echo of its own input rather than an independent discovery. Some independent static support does exist from the direct DFT relaxations of shaken fcc cells and Tables S2/S3, so this does not invalidate the structure's existence, but it does invalidate the 'independent method' claim for the AIRSS/EDDP arm.

  2. other [Results and Discussion (MD-SED cross-check); Methods (MTP)]
    "Because both SSCHA and MD-SED require performing hundreds of thousands of DFT calculations for full convergence, carrying out these computations solely at the DFT level is not feasible. Instead, we used DFT-calculated data to train high-fidelity machine-learned ab initio interatomic potentials that retain DFT-level accuracy in energies and forces. ... The convergence of results from these two complementary approaches lends strong support to the existence of the novel P ¯43m-NbN phase."

    Both SSCHA and MD-SED are accelerated with the same fitted MTP, so their mutual agreement tests the internal consistency of two statistical-mechanics frameworks on one shared potential-energy surface. It does not independently confirm that this fitted surface is DFT-accurate in the P-43m basin. The 65 meV/atom free-energy ordering and the quantum-stabilization narrative rest on this shared fitted input, so the claimed 'complementary' MD-SED agreement is not an independent verification of the central claim.

full rationale

The core derivation is not circular in the strictest sense: the MTP was trained on 100 DFT configurations around δ-NbN at 300 K, not on the P-43m free-energy answer, and the superconducting Tc is computed from SSCHA phonons with a GW-derived μ* without fitting to experiment. However, two load-bearing claims of independence are weaker than presented. First, the AIRSS/EDDP search included P-43m as a training marker, so its identification of P-43m is partly seeded by the target structure. Second, SSCHA and MD-SED share the same machine-learned potential, so their agreement checks consistency on the fitted PES rather than providing independent DFT-level confirmation. The SI validation additionally draws its 100 test structures from the final MTP-driven SSCHA population at 15 K, which cannot detect a systematic bias that excludes or distorts the true anharmonic basin. The static P-43m minimum does have more independent support from direct DFT relaxations of shaken fcc cells and the DFT refinements in Tables S2/S3, and the 65 meV/atom ordering remains a genuine MTP-SSCHA prediction rather than a parameter fitted to the target. These issues reduce the strength of the 'three independent methods' narrative and leave the central free-energy ordering dependent on a single MLIP, but they do not make the derivation equivalent to its inputs by definition. Overall circularity is therefore moderate: 4/10.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central result rests on the accuracy of machine-learned potentials, the SSCHA anharmonic treatment, and the Eliashberg input mu*. The P-43m phase itself is the key new entity, with falsifiable diffraction and Tc predictions.

free parameters (2)
  • Screened Coulomb pseudopotential mu* = 0.21 (from GW)
    Input to Migdal-Eliashberg; computed via SternheimerGW rather than fitted to Tc, but no uncertainty is provided and Tc = 20 K depends sensitively on it.
  • MD-SED lattice parameter = 4.482262 Å
    Used in SED simulations; differs from the DFT P-43m lattice constant of 4.421 Å, with no explanation given. This could shift the anharmonic phonon peaks used as corroborating evidence.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption PBE exchange-correlation functional and norm-conserving pseudopotentials give accurate DFT energies, forces, and phonons for NbN.
    Used for all DFT, MTP training, SSCHA, and DFPT. Approximations in PBE could shift relative phase energies, though the 65 meV/atom gap is large.
  • ad hoc to paper MTP trained on 100 structures around delta-NbN at 300 K accurately represents the P-43m basin.
    Stated in Methods; validated only on distorted and near-P-43m structures, not by full DFT SSCHA on the final relaxed phase.
  • domain assumption SSCHA free-energy Hessian in the bubble approximation and 10,000-configuration ensembles yield converged anharmonic phonons.
    Methods state convergence criteria; the bubble approximation excludes the fourth-order term, which could affect near-Gamma modes.
  • domain assumption Isotropic Migdal-Eliashberg with mu* = 0.21 from GW is adequate for Tc of NbN.
    Used in IsoME; anisotropy is checked with EPW, but GW mu* has no uncertainty and Tc is sensitive to it.
  • domain assumption AIRSS EDDP energy window and removal of hexagonal structures preserve all relevant cubic candidates.
    Search methodology in Methods; could miss higher-energy cubic phases, but for the present claim the relevant comparison is with delta, not with all possible phases.
invented entities (1)
  • P-43m cubic NbN phase independent evidence
    purpose: Explains a stable, vacancy-free cubic 1:1 NbN structure and its superconducting properties without invoking nitrogen vacancies.
    Predicts characteristic XRD peaks (Fig. 2b), a 65 meV/atom free-energy advantage over delta, and Tc = 20 K; these are testable by synthesis and high-resolution diffraction, but no clear experimental observation exists yet.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Vacancy-free cubic superconducting NbN enabled by quantum anharmonicity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LPHMNTCD

@misc{pith2026250703417,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Vacancy-free cubic superconducting NbN enabled by quantum anharmonicity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LPHMNTCD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.03417}
}
abstract

Niobium nitride (NbN) is renowned for its exceptional mechanical, electronic, magnetic, and superconducting properties. The ideal 1:1 stoichiometric $\delta$-NbN cubic phase, however, is known to be dynamically unstable, and repeated experimental observations have indicated that vacancies are necessary for its stabilization. In this work, we demonstrate that when the structure is fully relaxed and allowed to distort under quantum anharmonic effects, a previously unreported stable cubic phase with space group $P\bar{4}3m$ emerges - 65 meV/atom lower in free energy than the ideal $\delta$ phase. This discovery is enabled by state-of-the-art first-principles calculations accelerated by machine-learned interatomic potentials. To evaluate the vibrational and superconducting properties with quantum anharmonic effects accounted for, we use the stochastic self-consistent harmonic approximation (SSCHA) and molecular dynamics spectral energy density (SED) methods. Electron-phonon coupling calculations based on the SSCHA phonon dispersion yield a superconducting transition temperature of $T_\text{c}$ = 20 K, which aligns closely with experimentally reported values for near-stoichiometric NbN. These findings challenge the long-held assumption that vacancies are essential for stabilizing cubic NbN and point to the potential of synthesizing the ideal 1:1 stoichiometric phase as a route to achieving enhanced superconducting performance in this technologically significant material.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.03417 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Top row: (a) phonon dispersion of Fm¯3m in the harmonic approximation (dotted black), (c) of Fm¯3m in the harmonic approximation using a large smearing parameter (dashed green), and (e) P¯43m structure within SSCHA at 15 K (solid blue). The colored background in (e) shows the spectral density obtained with MD-SED. Bottom row: phonon DOS (dashed line, rescaled by a factor of 1/3 to enable same scales with the other q… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Superposition of the Fm¯3m (green) and P¯43m (blue) NbN crystal structures, showing all atoms of each structure in a single color. The overlay highlights how P¯43m distorts from the high-symmetry Fm¯3m phase. Structures visualized with VESTA [40]. (b) Simulated XRD patterns using Cu Kα radiation [41]. — provides compelling evidence that this structure rep￾resents the true quantum-mechanical ground state of sto￾i… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Electronic band structures (a) and DOS (b) for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Temperature dependence of the superconducting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An $ab\;initio$ answer to long-debated questions about superconducting Nb$_3$Sn

    cond-mat.supr-con 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    An ab initio study finds Nb3Sn's superconducting gap is anisotropic yet fully open with 3D orbital pairing, and attributes the Hc2 drop at the martensitic transition to longer coherence lengths from Fermi-velocity red...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    \ Chen , author V

    author author X.-J. \ Chen , author V. V. \ Struzhkin , author Z. Wu , author R. E. \ Cohen , author S. Kung , author H.-k. \ Mao , author R. J. \ Hemley ,\ and\ author A. N. \ Christensen ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.094514 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 72 ,\ pages 094514 ( year 2005 a ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.094514

  2. [2]

    \ Chen , author V

    author author X.-J. \ Chen , author V. V. \ Struzhkin , author Z. Wu , author M. Somayazulu , author J. Qian , author S. Kung , author A. N. \ Christensen , author Y. Zhao , author R. E. \ Cohen , author H. kwang Mao ,\ and\ author R. J. \ Hemley ,\ https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0500174102 journal journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences \ v...

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.0500174102

  3. [3]

    Soignard , author O

    author author E. Soignard , author O. Shebanova ,\ and\ author P. F. \ McMillan ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.75.014104 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 75 ,\ pages 014104 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.75.014104 2007

  4. [4]

    Williams , author K

    author author M. Williams , author K. Ralls ,\ and\ author M. Pickus ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697(67)90129-1 journal journal Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids \ volume 28 ,\ pages 333 ( year 1967 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-3697(67)90129-1

  5. [5]

    author author A. Y. \ Kasumov , author R. Deblock , author M. Kociak , author B. Reulet , author H. Bouchiat , author I. I. \ Khodos , author Y. B. \ Gorbatov , author V. T. \ Volkov , author C. Journet ,\ and\ author M. Burghard ,\ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5419.1508 journal journal Science \ volume 284 ,\ pages 1508 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    work page arXiv

  6. [6]

    Zou , author X

    author author Y. Zou , author X. Wang , author T. Chen , author X. Li , author X. Qi , author D. Welch , author P. Zhu , author B. Liu , author T. Cui ,\ and\ author B. Li ,\ journal journal Scientific Reports \ volume 5 ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10811 10.1038/srep10811 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/srep10811

  7. [7]

    Oya \ and\ author Y

    author author G. Oya \ and\ author Y. Onodera ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1663418 journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 45 ,\ pages 1389 ( year 1974 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1663418 1974

  8. [8]

    Aschermann , author E

    author author G. Aschermann , author E. Friederich , author E. Justi ,\ and\ author J. Kramer ,\ @noop journal journal Physikalische Zeitschrift \ volume 42 ,\ pages 349 ( year 1941 ) NoStop

    work page 1941

Show all 80 references
  1. [9]

    author author K. S. \ Keskar , author T. Yamashita ,\ and\ author Y. Onodera ,\ https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.10.370 journal journal Japanese Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 10 ,\ pages 370 ( year 1971 ) NoStop

    1971 doi

  2. [10]

    author author K. M. \ Shen \ and\ author J. S. \ Davis ,\ @noop journal journal Materials today \ volume 11 ,\ pages 14 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008

  3. [11]

    author author V. Z. \ Kresin \ and\ author S. A. \ Wolf ,\ @noop title Fundamentals of superconductivity \ ( publisher Springer Science & Business Media ,\ year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013

  4. [12]

    Hosono \ and\ author K

    author author H. Hosono \ and\ author K. Kuroki ,\ @noop journal journal Physica C: Superconductivity and its Applications \ volume 514 ,\ pages 399 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  5. [13]

    Boeri , author R

    author author L. Boeri , author R. Hennig , author P. Hirschfeld , author G. Profeta , author A. Sanna , author E. Zurek , author W. E. \ Pickett , author M. Amsler , author R. Dias , author M. I. \ Eremets , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ac2864 journal journal J...

    doi

  6. [14]

    author author B. Y. \ Wang , author K. Lee ,\ and\ author B. H. \ Goodge ,\ @noop journal journal Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics \ volume 15 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024

  7. [15]

    Cucciniello , author D

    author author N. Cucciniello , author D. Lee , author H. Y. \ Feng , author Z. Yang , author H. Zeng , author N. Patibandla , author M. Zhu ,\ and\ author Q. Jia ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648x/ac7dd6 journal journal Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter \ volume 34 ,\ pag...

    doi

  8. [16]

    Benvenuti , author P

    author author C. Benvenuti , author P. Chiggiato , author L. Parrini ,\ and\ author R. Russo ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(93)91077-Z journal journal Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors an...

    doi

  9. [17]

    Lindgren , author M

    author author M. Lindgren , author M. Currie , author W.-S. \ Zeng , author R. Sobolewski , author S. Cherednichenko , author B. Voronov ,\ and\ author G. Gol'tsman ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-1807(98)00110-0 journal journal Applied Superconductivity \ vol...

    doi

  10. [18]

    Setzu , author E

    author author R. Setzu , author E. Baggetta ,\ and\ author J. C. \ Villégier ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/97/1/012077 journal journal Journal of Physics: Conference Series \ volume 97 ,\ pages 012077 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008 doi

  11. [19]

    Nakamura , author H

    author author Y. Nakamura , author H. Terai , author K. Inomata , author T. Yamamoto , author W. Qiu ,\ and\ author Z. Wang ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3663539 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 99 ,\ pages 212502 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    doi

  12. [20]

    Marsili , author F

    author author F. Marsili , author F. Bellei , author F. Najafi , author A. E. \ Dane , author E. A. \ Dauler , author R. J. \ Molnar ,\ and\ author K. K. \ Berggren ,\ @noop journal journal Nano letters \ volume 12 ,\ pages 4799 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012

  13. [21]

    Simon , author R

    author author A. Simon , author R. Foster , author M. Sahoo , author J. Shi , author E. Batson , author F. Incalza , author C. Heil ,\ and\ author K. K. \ Berggren ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.13791 \ ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025

  14. [22]

    Zunger , author S.-H

    author author A. Zunger , author S.-H. \ Wei , author L. G. \ Ferreira ,\ and\ author J. E. \ Bernard ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.353 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 65 ,\ pages 353 ( year 1990 ) NoStop

    1990 doi

  15. [23]

    \ Wei , author L

    author author S.-H. \ Wei , author L. G. \ Ferreira , author J. E. \ Bernard ,\ and\ author A. Zunger ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.42.9622 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 42 ,\ pages 9622 ( year 1990 ) NoStop

    1990 doi

  16. [24]

    Ferreira , author R

    author author P. Ferreira , author R. Lucrezi , author I. Guilhon , author M. Marques , author L. Teles , author C. Heil ,\ and\ author L. Eleno ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtphys.2024.101547 journal journal Materials Today Physics \ volume 48 ,\ pages 101547 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024

  17. [25]

    Marksteiner , author P

    author author P. Marksteiner , author P. Weinberger , author A. Neckel , author R. Zeller ,\ and\ author P. H. \ Dederichs ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.33.6709 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 33 ,\ pages 6709 ( year 1986 ) NoStop

    doi

  18. [26]

    author author V. I. \ Ivashchenko , author P. E. A. \ Turchi ,\ and\ author E. I. \ Olifan ,\ journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 82 ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.82.054109 10.1103/physrevb.82.054109 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  19. [27]

    author author K. R. \ Babu \ and\ author G.-Y. \ Guo ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.104508 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 99 ,\ pages 104508 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  20. [28]

    author author N. R. \ Werthamer ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.1.572 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 1 ,\ pages 572 ( year 1970 ) NoStop

    1970 doi

  21. [29]

    Monacelli , author R

    author author L. Monacelli , author R. Bianco , author M. Cherubini , author M. Calandra , author I. Errea ,\ and\ author F. Mauri ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648x/ac066b journal journal Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter \ volume 33 ,\ pages 363001 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi

  22. [30]

    Larkin , author J

    author author J. Larkin , author J. Turney , author A. Massicotte , author C. Amon ,\ and\ author A. McGaughey ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience \ volume 11 ,\ pages 249 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014

  23. [31]

    Honarvar \ and\ author M

    author author H. Honarvar \ and\ author M. I. \ Hussein ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 93 ,\ pages 081412 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  24. [32]

    author author C. J. \ Pickard \ and\ author R. J. \ Needs ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.045504 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 97 ,\ pages 045504 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006 doi

  25. [33]

    author author C. J. \ Pickard \ and\ author R. J. \ Needs ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/23/5/053201 journal journal Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter \ volume 23 ,\ pages 053201 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  26. [34]

    Giustino ,\ @noop title Materials modelling using density functional theory: properties and predictions \ ( publisher Oxford University Press ,\ year 2014 ) NoStop

    author author F. Giustino ,\ @noop title Materials modelling using density functional theory: properties and predictions \ ( publisher Oxford University Press ,\ year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014

  27. [35]

    Giustino ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.015003 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 89 ,\ pages 015003 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    author author F. Giustino ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.015003 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 89 ,\ pages 015003 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  28. [36]

    Christensen , author O

    author author A. Christensen , author O. Dietrich , author W. Kress , author W. Teuchert ,\ and\ author R. Currat ,\ @noop journal journal Solid State Communications \ volume 31 ,\ pages 795 ( year 1979 ) NoStop

    1979

  29. [37]

    @noop note The Supplementary Information is available at [...]. Stop

  30. [38]

    Lucrezi , author E

    author author R. Lucrezi , author E. Kogler , author S. Di Cataldo , author M. Aichhorn , author L. Boeri ,\ and\ author C. Heil ,\ @noop journal journal Communications Physics \ volume 6 ,\ pages 298 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023

  31. [39]

    At 300 \,K, calculations using a 2 2 2 supercell of the primitive fcc unit cell yield fully positive phonon frequencies

    note SSCHA calculations at 0 \,K reveal a lattice instability through the presence of imaginary phonon frequencies, regardless of the supercell size. At 300 \,K, calculations using a 2 2 2 supercell of the primitive fcc unit cell yield fully positive phonon frequencies. Howeve...

  32. [40]

    Momma \ and\ author F

    author author K. Momma \ and\ author F. Izumi ,\ https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889811038970 journal journal Journal of Applied Crystallography \ volume 44 ,\ pages 1272 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  33. [41]

    Kraus \ and\ author G

    author author W. Kraus \ and\ author G. Nolze ,\ @noop journal journal Powder Diffraction \ volume 13 ,\ pages 256 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    1998

  34. [42]

    In the corresponding harmonic phonon calculation [Fig

    note Closer inspection of the structure obtained from the full SSCHA relaxation shows that its atomic arrangement can be described as a linear combination of the eigenvectors of a threefold-degenerate mode with T_ 1u symmetry in the conventional (primitive cubic) unit cell of ...

  35. [43]

    author author C. J. \ Pickard ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.014102 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 106 ,\ pages 014102 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  36. [44]

    note See SI Tables S2 and S3 SI . Further analysis shows that P4/nmm and P4_2/mcm are dynamically unstable within both the harmonic approximation and SSCHA, further supporting P 4 3m as the most physically plausible structure among those considered. Stop

  37. [45]

    Plimpton ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 journal journal J

    author author S. Plimpton ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 journal journal J. Comput. Phys. \ volume 117 ,\ pages 1 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    1995

  38. [46]

    Marx \ and\ author M

    author author D. Marx \ and\ author M. Parrinello ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.471221 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 104 ,\ pages 4077 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996 doi

  39. [47]

    author author T. E. \ Markland \ and\ author M. Ceriotti ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-017-0109 journal journal Nature Reviews Chemistry \ volume 2 ,\ pages 0109 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  40. [48]

    Hirshberg , author V

    author author B. Hirshberg , author V. Rizzi ,\ and\ author M. Parrinello ,\ https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1913365116 journal journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences \ volume 116 ,\ pages 21445 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  41. [49]

    Pl \'e , author N

    author author T. Pl \'e , author N. Mauger , author O. Adjoua , author T. J. \ Inizan , author L. Lagardère , author S. Huppert ,\ and\ author J.-P. \ Piquemal ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.2c01233 journal journal Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation \ volume 19 ,\...

    doi

  42. [50]

    Kawamura ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2019.01.017 journal journal Computer Physics Communications \ volume 239 ,\ pages 197 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    author author M. Kawamura ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2019.01.017 journal journal Computer Physics Communications \ volume 239 ,\ pages 197 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  43. [51]

    Kogler , author D

    author author E. Kogler , author D. Spath , author R. Lucrezi , author H. Mori , author Z. Zhu , author Z. Li , author E. R. \ Margine ,\ and\ author C. Heil ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.03559 title Isome: Streamlining high-precision eliashberg calculations ( year 2025 ),\ ht...

    2025 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Lucrezi , author P

    author author R. Lucrezi , author P. P. \ Ferreira , author S. Hajinazar , author H. Mori , author H. Paudyal , author E. R. \ Margine ,\ and\ author C. Heil ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-024-01528-6 journal journal Communications Physics \ volume 7 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2024 ...

    doi

  45. [53]

    Lee , author S

    author author H. Lee , author S. Poncé , author K. Bushick , author S. Hajinazar , author J. Lafuente-Bartolome , author J. Leveillee , author C. Lian , author J.-M. \ Lihm , author F. Macheda , author H. Mori , author H. Paudyal , author W. H. \ Sio , author S. Tiwari , autho...

    doi

  46. [54]

    Lambert \ and\ author F

    author author H. Lambert \ and\ author F. Giustino ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.075117 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 88 ,\ pages 075117 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  47. [55]

    author author A. N. \ Christensen , author G. Magniez , author J.-P. \ Chaminade , author M. Pouchard , author P. Hagenmuller ,\ and\ author A. F. \ Andresen ,\ https://doi.org/10.3891/acta.chem.scand.31a-0077 journal journal Acta Chemica Scandinavica \ volume 31a ,\ pages 77–...

    doi

  48. [56]

    Miura , author T

    author author A. Miura , author T. Takei , author N. Kumada , author S. Wada , author E. Magome , author C. Moriyoshi ,\ and\ author Y. Kuroiwa ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/ic400830b journal journal Inorganic Chemistry \ volume 52 ,\ pages 9699–9701 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    doi

  49. [57]

    author author R. E. \ Treece , author M. S. \ Osofsky , author E. F. \ Skelton , author S. B. \ Qadri , author J. S. \ Horwitz ,\ and\ author D. B. \ Chrisey ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.51.9356 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 51 ,\ pages 9356 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    doi

  50. [58]

    Heger \ and\ author O

    author author G. Heger \ and\ author O. Baumgartner ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/13/32/008 journal journal Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics \ volume 13 ,\ pages 5833–5841 ( year 1980 ) NoStop

    1980 doi

  51. [59]

    author author C. M. \ Yen , author L. E. \ Toth , author Y. M. \ Shy , author D. E. \ Anderson ,\ and\ author L. G. \ Rosner ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1709868 journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 38 ,\ pages 2268 ( year 1967 ) NoStop

    doi

  52. [60]

    Duwez \ and\ author F

    author author P. Duwez \ and\ author F. Odell ,\ https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2777885 journal journal Journal of The Electrochemical Society \ volume 97 ,\ pages 299 ( year 1950 ) NoStop

    1950 doi

  53. [61]

    Brauer \ and\ author R

    author author G. Brauer \ and\ author R. Esselborn ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.19613090303 journal journal Zeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine Chemie \ volume 309 ,\ pages 151 ( year 1961 ) NoStop

    1961 doi

  54. [62]

    Brauer \ and\ author W

    author author G. Brauer \ and\ author W. Kiliani ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.19794520104 journal journal Zeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine Chemie \ volume 452 ,\ pages 17 ( year 1979 ) NoStop

    1979 doi

  55. [63]

    a ffer , author K. J. \ Watson ,\ and\ author M. Sandstr\

    author author A. N. \ Christensen , author J. Josephsen , author C. E. \ Sch\" a ffer , author K. J. \ Watson ,\ and\ author M. Sandstr\" o m ,\ https://doi.org/10.3891/acta.chem.scand.30a-0219 journal journal Acta Chemica Scandinavica \ volume 30a ,\ pages 219–224 ( year 1976...

    doi

  56. [64]

    author author A. N. \ Christensen , author S. Fregerslev , author S. K. \ Ratkje , author M. Pouchard , author P. Hagenmuller ,\ and\ author A. F. \ Andresen ,\ https://doi.org/10.3891/acta.chem.scand.31a-0861 journal journal Acta Chemica Scandinavica \ volume 31a ,\ pages 861...

    doi

  57. [65]

    author author A. N. \ Christensen , author R. G. \ Hazell , author M. S. \ Lehmann , author D. Wright ,\ and\ author K. Selte ,\ https://doi.org/10.3891/acta.chem.scand.35a-0111 journal journal Acta Chemica Scandinavica \ volume 35a ,\ pages 111–115 ( year 1981 ) NoStop

    doi

  58. [66]

    Brauer \ and\ author J

    author author G. Brauer \ and\ author J. Jander ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.19522700114 journal journal Zeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine Chemie \ volume 270 ,\ pages 160 ( year 1952 ) NoStop

    1952 doi

  59. [67]

    Pessall , author R

    author author N. Pessall , author R. Gold ,\ and\ author H. Johansen ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697(68)90251-5 journal journal Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids \ volume 29 ,\ pages 19–38 ( year 1968 ) NoStop

    1968 doi

  60. [68]

    Lengauer \ and\ author P

    author author W. Lengauer \ and\ author P. Ettmayer ,\ https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00816521 journal journal Monatshefte fuer Chemie/Chemical Monthly \ volume 117 ,\ pages 275 ( year 1986 ) NoStop

    1986 doi

  61. [69]

    Terao ,\ https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.4.353 journal journal Japanese Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 4 ,\ pages 353 ( year 1965 ) NoStop

    author author N. Terao ,\ https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.4.353 journal journal Japanese Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 4 ,\ pages 353 ( year 1965 ) NoStop

    1965 doi

  62. [70]

    Christensen \ and\ author C

    author author A. Christensen \ and\ author C. Rusche ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0248(78)90003-9 journal journal Journal of Crystal Growth \ volume 44 ,\ pages 383 ( year 1978 ) NoStop

    1978 doi

  63. [71]

    Tan , author S

    author author J. Tan , author S. Zhang , author S. Wang , author W. Wang , author X. Zheng , author J. Zhao , author W. Li , author X. Mao , author K. Liu , author X. Zhou , author Y. Zhao , author C. Jin ,\ and\ author X. Yu ,\ journal journal physica status solidi (b) \ volu...

    doi

  64. [72]

    Giannozzi , author S

    author author P. Giannozzi , author S. Baroni , author N. Bonini , author M. Calandra , author R. Car , author C. Cavazzoni , author D. Ceresoli , author G. L. \ Chiarotti , author M. Cococcioni , author I. Dabo , author A. Dal Corso , author S. de Gironcoli , author S. Fabris...

    2009

  65. [73]

    Giannozzi , author O

    author author P. Giannozzi , author O. Andreussi , author T. Brumme , author O. Bunau , author M. B. \ Nardelli , author M. Calandra , author R. Car , author C. Cavazzoni , author D. Ceresoli , author M. Cococcioni , author N. Colonna , author I. Carnimeo , author A. D. \ Cors...

    2017

  66. [74]

    Giannozzi , author O

    author author P. Giannozzi , author O. Baseggio , author P. Bonfà , author D. Brunato , author R. Car , author I. Carnimeo , author C. Cavazzoni , author S. de Gironcoli , author P. Delugas , author F. Ferrari Ruffino , author A. Ferretti , author N. Marzari , author I. Timrov...

    doi

  67. [75]

    author author J. P. \ Perdew , author K. Burke ,\ and\ author M. Ernzerhof ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 77 ,\ pages 3865 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996 doi

  68. [76]

    author author D. R. \ Hamann ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.085117 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 88 ,\ pages 085117 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  69. [77]

    author author S. J. \ Clark , author M. D. \ Segall , author C. J. \ Pickard , author P. J. \ Hasnip , author M. I. J. \ Probert , author K. Refson ,\ and\ author M. C. \ Payne ,\ https://doi.org/10.1524/zkri.220.5.567.65075 journal journal Zeitschrift f\"ur Krist. - Cryst. Ma...

    doi

  70. [78]

    author author I. S. \ Novikov , author K. Gubaev , author E. V. \ Podryabinkin ,\ and\ author A. V. \ Shapeev ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/abc9fe journal journal Machine Learning: Science and Technology \ volume 2 ,\ pages 025002 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi

  71. [79]

    Lucrezi , author P

    author author R. Lucrezi , author P. P. \ Ferreira , author M. Aichhorn ,\ and\ author C. Heil ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-44326-4 journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 15 ,\ pages 441 ( year 2024 b ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  72. [80]

    author author J. A. \ Thomas , author J. E. \ Turney , author R. M. \ Iutzi , author C. H. \ Amon ,\ and\ author A. J. \ McGaughey ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 81 ,\ pages 081411 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.