Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Blowing-up the edge: connection formulae and stability chart of the Lam\'e equation

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read A single Nakajima–Yoshioka blow-up equation in the Nekrasov–Shatashvili limit fully determines resummed prepotentials $W_0$ and $W_1$, with branch cuts at the Lamé and Mathieu band–gap edges.

desk verdict A genuinely new NS-limit blow-up resummation method that deserves referee time, but the all-orders claim rests on an unproved ansatz completeness and uniqueness. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.04860 v1 pith:UADRP3LT submitted 2025-07-07 hep-th math-phmath.MP

classification hep-thmath-phmath.MP
keywords LaméequationNekrasov-Shatashvililimitblow-upequationssemi-classicalconformalblocksMathieustabilitychartconnectionformulasAGTcorrespondence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the Nekrasov–Shatashvili (NS) limit of Nakajima–Yoshioka blow-up equations reduces the resummation problem of semi-classical Virasoro blocks to a compact system involving only the leading NS free energy $W_0$ and its first $\epsilon_2$-correction $W_1$. It further claims that a single such blow-up equation, in either the C$_2$ or the C$_2/\mathbb{Z}_2$ variant, is enough to fix the profile functions appearing in a proposed resummation ansatz, thereby determining the resummed $W_0$ and $W_1$ completely. The resulting resummed NS free energy develops square-root branch cuts precisely at the integer Floquet exponents that separate bands from gaps in the Lamé (and Mathieu) spectrum, turning a previously inaccessible region into computable eigenvalues for periodic and anti-periodic solutions. The authors use this to build the stability chart, solve the Lamé connection problem, and check the resulting eigenvalues and eigenfunctions against isomonodromic deformation and orbifold surface defect computations, finding agreement.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the NS limit of the Nakajima–Yoshioka blow-up equations for SU(2) gauge theories, together with the resummation ansatz (3.22)/(3.35) expressing $W_{0,\mathrm{inst}}$ and $W_{1,\mathrm{inst}}$ through profile functions with denominators $j\pm 2a/\hbar$. The blow-up identity, expanded around the special Coulomb branch points $2a=m_1+t^{m_2/2}/x$, converts into algebraic equations (C$_2$ case) or first-order ODEs (C$_2/\mathbb{Z}_2$ case) for these profiles; the change of variables $u_{m_2}=\exp(2\tilde f_{1,m_2})$, $\partial_x g_{1,m_2}=x^{-2}\log(x^2\tilde v_{m_2})$ linearizes the leading equation and exposes the square-root and logarithmic branch structure. It is this branch structure, read off from the profiles, that places the branch cuts of the resummed free energy at the band–gap edges of the Lamé and Mathieu spectral problems.

What would settle it

Compute the SU(2) $\mathcal{N}=2^\ast$ NS prepotential by direct instanton counting to order $q^{10}$ at a generic non-half-integer $a/\hbar$, re-expand the proposed resummed expression (3.35) around $q=0$, and compare term by term; any mismatch, or a failure of the quadratic equation (4.21) for $\tilde v_{m_2}$ to reproduce the branch-point location, would falsify the central claim. Independently, the eigenvalue prediction $e_{1,-}(\mu;q)$ of (5.3) can be checked against the Hill-determinant or continued-fraction computation for a fixed non-integer $\mu$ at order $q^{3/2}$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery, stated in Eqs. (1.2)–(1.3) and Section 3, is that in the limit $\epsilon_1=\epsilon_2=\hbar$ the vanishing C$_2$ blow-up equations for SU(2) theories with $N_f\le 4$ fundamentals, and their $\mathcal{N}=2^\ast$ counterpart, collapse to single identities containing only $W_0$, $W_1$ and their first derivatives. Postulating that the instanton parts of these prepotentials are sums of profile functions $g_{k,j}$, $\tilde g_{k,j}$, $\tilde f_{k,j}$ evaluated at $q^{j/2}/(j\pm 2a/\hbar)$, with definite parity and vanishing at zero argument, the blow-up equation determines the profiles recursively, order by order in the coupling. The profiles contain logarithmic and square-root branchings; the square roots enter precisely where the naive perturbative block has poles at integer Floquet exponents. Hence the resummed block is a single analytic object whose branch cuts coincide with the band–gap edges, and taking the limit $\nu\to n^\pm$ yields the periodic/anti-periodic eigenvalues, for example $e_{1,\pm}(\mu;q)=1-\frac{1}{3}\mu(\mu-1)\pm 4\mu(\mu-1)q^{1/2}+O(q)$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the proposed ansatz—writing the instanton prepotentials as sums of profile functions with denominators $j\pm 2a/\hbar$, with definite parity and vanishing at zero—exhausts the resummation; if the true resummed prepotentials contain additional singular terms of a different form, or if the profiles are not uniquely fixed by the leading-order blow-up equations, the branch cuts and the derived band-edge eigenvalues would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The periodic and anti-periodic eigenvalues of the Lamé equation can be computed as $q$-expansions with fractional powers, as in Eq. (5.3), instead of diverging at integer Floquet exponents.
  • A single blow-up equation fixes both NS prepotentials $W_0$ and $W_1$; once the profiles are known, any further blow-up equation is automatically satisfied, so the resummation is over-determined yet consistent.
  • The same resummed block yields connection formulas for the semi-classical torus block, and the pure-gauge/$N_f=0$ limit gives the corresponding Mathieu connection formulas and stability chart.
  • The B-cycle periodic spectral problem can be analyzed through the trace of the B-cycle monodromy matrix, producing both scattering-state expansions and quasi-bound state eigenvalues such as Eqs. (5.57)–(5.59).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same resummation should apply to the wave function itself, not just the prepotential, since the surface-defect partition function exhibits the same lattice of poles; the authors list this as an open question.
  • Because the C$_2/\mathbb{Z}_2$ route makes the profile equations differential, the mechanism likely extends to any theory whose blow-up equations share the same 1-loop factor structure, including quiver and higher-rank theories, with the integrating factors playing the role of the 1-loop data.
  • The appearance of the same branch cuts in logarithmic Painlevé tau functions with resonant initial conditions suggests an independent derivation of the band-edge structure through fine-tuned double-scaling limits.
  • The B-cycle quasi-bound state formula (5.57) for $\mu=2$ is directly testable by numerical integration of the Lamé equation at large $\tau$; any mismatch in the $\sqrt{q}$ coefficient would indicate that the resummation misses singular terms at $a=1/2$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a new method to resum Nekrasov–Shatashvili (NS) free energies of SU(2) gauge theories with Nf ≤ 4 fundamental hypermultiplets and of the N = 2* theory, by taking the NS limit of the Nakajima–Yoshioka blow-up equations on C2 and on C2/Z2. The authors introduce an ansatz for the resummed instanton parts of W0 and W1 in terms of profile functions g, g̃, f̃, and they derive algebraic equations (C2 case) and ordinary differential equations (C2/Z2 case) that determine these functions. The resulting resummed blocks have square-root branch cuts whose location is identified with the band-gap edges of the Lamé (and Mathieu) spectral problem. Using this structure, the paper computes periodic and anti-periodic eigenvalues, reconstructs the stability chart, and gives connection formulae for the semi-classical torus blocks. The results are compared with isomonodromic deformation techniques, orbifold surface defect partition functions, and Hill-determinant computations.

Significance. If the all-orders claim is correct, the paper provides a systematic and powerful way to analyze semi-classical Virasoro blocks near their pole lattice, and a direct bridge between blow-up equations and periodic spectral problems. The method extends earlier conjectures of Refs. [27,28] and gives explicit low-order profile functions that are tested against standard methods. The paper also produces concrete, falsifiable predictions: the band-edge eigenvalue expansions (5.3)–(5.4), the stability chart in Figure 1, and the connection formulas of Section 2. The appendices contain worked examples that are valuable for reproducibility. At the same time, the central derivation is formal: the resummation ansatz is assumed, the induction is only verified at low orders, and the advertised perfect agreement with isomonodromic and orbifold-defect methods is asserted more strongly than it is demonstrated.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3.2, Eqs. (3.22a)–(3.22b) and (3.35a)–(3.35b)] The central claim that the ansatz captures the full resummed NS free energy is not established. The paper verifies low orders (Appendix C.2, C.3) and infers a pattern in Section 3.4, but it does not prove that no additional singular terms with denominators different from j ± 2a/ħ can appear, nor that the boundary conditions (vanishing at x = 0 and power-series compatibility at infinity) select a unique solution of the nonlinear system (3.27)–(3.30) or (3.38). The branch ambiguity in Eqs. (3.31)/(4.21) and the integration constants entering at every order are fixed only in examples. Since Section 5 uses the resummed W0 and W1 to compute band-edge eigenvalues and connection formulae, this unproven completeness and uniqueness is load-bearing. The paper should either provide an inductive closure argument that shows the ansatz is exhaustive and the solution unique at all orders, or clearly restate the all-orders results as a conjecture supported by finite-order checks.
  2. [Sections 5.1–5.2 and Abstract] The claimed “perfect agreement” with isomonodromic deformation and orbifold defect methods is not shown explicitly. For the isomonodromic method, the matching is demonstrated only for the ν → 0 case (the equation after (5.23)); for higher |ν|, the text states that eigenvalues “are observed to match” without displaying the equality. For the orbifold defect method, Section 5.2 defines W^{n,±}_0 and formula (5.38) but does not give an explicit comparison of the resulting eigenvalues with (5.3). Moreover, these two checks are not fully independent, since the isomonodromic tau-function in (5.17) is itself expressed through Nekrasov partition functions and the orbifold defect computation uses the same Z^{U(2)}_{inst} normalization in (5.33). The independent Hill-determinant check in Appendix B.1 is valuable but is used only for the first few coefficients. The authors should either display the explicit term-by-term matching for general |ν| or qualify the agreement claim accordingly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.1, Eq. (3.16)] The derivation of the NS limit is compressed: the notation ∂_ħ W0(a+nħ, {μ̃_i}, ħ; t) is ambiguous because the shifted masses μ̃_i depend on ħ. The cancellation of the mass-derivative terms is not shown; a short explanatory sentence or a displayed intermediate step would remove the ambiguity.
  2. [Section 3.4] The statement that “The emerging pattern has been tested for higher or lower values of k and n, depending on the computational complexity” is vague. Please specify the maximum values of (k, n) actually verified for each Nf and for the N = 2* case, so that the reader can assess the strength of the conjecture.
  3. [Appendix C.3, around Eq. (C.34)] The sentence explaining the choice c1 = -2 refers to “the next section” (C.4) and to a criterion about the coefficient of x^4 inside a square root; this criterion is not derived and is confusing in context. Please rewrite it more explicitly.
  4. [Equation (2.32)] The B-cycle monodromy matrix would be easier to read if displayed as a proper matrix with bracket delimiters; the current inline fraction-heavy notation is hard to parse.
  5. [Reference [75]] Reference [75] is given as “H. Desiraju, private communication” with no further detail. If a result from this communication is used, please provide a preprint or publication reference, or state explicitly which statement relies on it.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Branch-cut location at band-gap edges is inherited from the explicit pole-position ansatz; the profile-function and eigenvalue derivation is otherwise self-contained.

  1. self definitional [Eqs. (3.22a)-(3.22b) and (3.35a)-(3.35b); Sec. 3.4; Sec. 5 (around Eq. (5.2))]
    "Generalizing the considerations of [27, 28], to solve equation (3.19) we make the following ansatz: W0,inst = R0 + ℏ Σ_{k,j} [Σ_± g_{k,j}((tℏ^{Nf-4})^{j/2}/(j ± 2a/ℏ), {µ_i/ℏ})] (tℏ^{Nf-4})^{k+j/2-1} ... From the point of view of the periodic spectral problem, the branch points of f(ν, µ; q) at ν ∈ Z correspond to the edges between gaps and bands."

    The ansatz (3.22) places the only singularities of the resummed W0,inst and W1,inst at j ± 2a/ℏ = 0, i.e. at integer Floquet exponent ν = 2a/ℏ = ±j. The later claim (Sec. 5) that the resummed block has branch cuts precisely at ν ∈ Z is therefore not an independent output: the cut endpoints inherit their location from the pole positions put in by hand in the ansatz. What is genuinely derived is the square-root branching (e.g. Eq. (3.31)/(4.21)) and the profile functions; the location of the singularities, which is the advertised band-gap-edge statement, is an input. The ansatz is transparently labelled as such, so this is a partial, not deceptive, circularity.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation—taking the NS limit of the Nakajima-Yoshioka blow-up equations (Eqs. (1.2)-(1.3), (4.4)-(4.5)), deriving algebraic/ODE equations for the profile functions, and using the resummed prepotentials to obtain eigenvalues, connection formulae, and the stability chart—is self-contained and cross-checked against standard methods such as the Hill determinant and the Mathieu limit. The one reduction-by-construction is the singular locus: the pole-position ansatz (3.22)/(3.35) is adopted from [27,28] with denominators j ± 2a/ℏ, so the advertised branch cuts at the integer Floquet exponents ν ∈ Z inherit their location from that ansatz rather than being derived from the blow-up equations alone. The profile functions themselves, the square-root structure, and the eigenvalue expansions are genuinely computed. The checks against isomonodromic deformations [32] and orbifold defects share the AGT/Nekrasov framework, and [32] is coauthored by a present author, but these are consistency checks rather than load-bearing premises, so they do not by themselves create circularity. The unproven completeness and uniqueness of the ansatz is a correctness/rigor risk, not a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation rests on standard AGT and blow-up identities, plus two paper-specific structural assumptions: the pole-containing ansatz for the resummed prepotentials and the inductive solvability by expanding at special values. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption AGT correspondence: Virasoro conformal blocks equal Nekrasov partition functions (Section 3, Eqs (3.2), (3.10)).
    The paper uses this to translate the spectral problem into gauge theory; it is a standard but unproved-in-paper correspondence.
  • domain assumption Nakajima-Yoshioka blow-up equations are exact identities for the Nekrasov partition functions (Eqs (3.12), (3.13), (4.1), (4.2)).
    These constraints are taken as input from the literature [29,32,80].
  • domain assumption The NS limit expansion (3.7)/(3.15) of the prepotential in powers of ϵ2 is uniformly valid, so the ϵ2 to ϵ1 limit can be taken termwise in the blow-up sums (Section 3.1).
    The exchange of limit and infinite sum is not proved; near the poles a+nℏ the expansion is singular.
  • ad hoc to paper The resummation ansatz (3.22a)-(3.22b) and its N=2* version (3.35) captures the full resummed NS free energies, with analytic profile functions of definite parity vanishing at x=0.
    This is the central structural assumption; no proof of completeness or uniqueness is given, only consistency with known expansions at low orders.
  • ad hoc to paper The expansion of the blow-up equation at the special values (3.23) determines all profile functions inductively (Sections 3.2.1, 4.2.2).
    The paper tests this for the first few m1, m2 and states the pattern continues.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Blowing-up the edge: connection formulae and stability chart of the Lam\'e equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UADRP3LT

@misc{pith2026250704860,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Blowing-up the edge: connection formulae and stability chart of the Lam\'e equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UADRP3LT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.04860}
}
abstract

We study periodic spectral problems through their connection with supersymmetric gauge theories and two-dimensional conformal field theory. To characterize the associated stability chart, we develop a novel and systematic approach for analyzing semi-classical Virasoro blocks near their poles. Via the AGT correspondence, these blocks correspond to SU(2) Nekrasov partition functions in the Nekrasov-Shatashvili limit, which we propose to resum using an appropriate limit of blow-up equations. We show that the analytic structure of the resulting resummed partition functions features branch cuts located precisely at the edges between bands and gaps in the spectrum of the associated quantum integrable system with periodic potential. We examine the Nekrasov partition functions of $\mathcal{N}=2$ SQCD with $N_f \le 4$ flavors and of the $\mathcal{N}=2^*$ theory, which are related to the Heun equation, its confluent forms, and the Lam\'e equation. In the latter case, we analyze the spectrum in detail and solve the associated connection problem. Finally, we compare our results with those obtained via isomonodromic deformation techniques and the computation of orbifold surface defect partition functions in the $\mathcal{N}=2^*$ gauge theory, finding perfect agreement.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Split Heun functions via blown-up surface defects

    hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5 of 10

    Blow-up equations for NS functions alone resum resonant poles of bulk and defect prepotentials, producing split Heun band-edge solutions, logarithmic companions, and nested mass loci for gap closure versus semisimple ...

  2. Refined Vafa-Witten invariants for toric surfaces from supersymmetric localization in 5D gauge theory

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    5D N=1* supersymmetric localization on toric surfaces equals refined Vafa–Witten invariants for odd first Chern class; the even-c1 case fails without a hand-added constant.

  3. Wall-crossing of Instantons on the Blow-up

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Instanton partition functions on the blow-up are given by chamber-dependent contour integrals over super-partitions selected by stability conditions, yielding explicit wall-crossing formulas that recover the Nakajima-...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Lam´ e,M´ emoire sur les surfaces isothermes dans les corps solides homog` enes en ´ equilibre de temp´ erature, J

    G. Lam´ e,M´ emoire sur les surfaces isothermes dans les corps solides homog` enes en ´ equilibre de temp´ erature, J. Math. Pures Appl. 2 (1837) 147

  2. [2]

    Alhassid, F

    Y. Alhassid, F. G¨ ursey and F. Iachello, Potential scattering, transfer matrix, and group theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 (1983) 873

  3. [3]

    Forini, Quark-antiquark potential in AdS at one loop , JHEP 11 (2010) 079 [ 1009.3939]

    V. Forini, Quark-antiquark potential in AdS at one loop , JHEP 11 (2010) 079 [ 1009.3939]

  4. [4]

    Giombi, S

    S. Giombi, S. Komatsu and B. Offertaler, Large charges on the Wilson loop in N = 4 SYM: matrix model and classical string , JHEP 03 (2022) 020 [ 2110.13126]

  5. [5]

    Giombi, S

    S. Giombi, S. Komatsu and B. Offertaler, Large charges on the Wilson loop in N = 4 SYM. Part II. Quantum fluctuations, OPE, and spectral curve , JHEP 08 (2022) 011 [2202.07627]

  6. [6]

    Liang, H.J.W

    J.-Q. Liang, H.J.W. Muller-Kirsten and D.H. Tchrakian, Solitons, bounces and sphalerons on a circle , Phys. Lett. B 282 (1992) 105

  7. [7]

    Belavin, A.M

    A.A. Belavin, A.M. Polyakov and A.B. Zamolodchikov, Infinite Conformal Symmetry in Two-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory , Nucl. Phys. B 241 (1984) 333

  8. [8]

    Bonelli, C

    G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, D.P. Lichtig and A. Tanzini, Irregular liouville correlators and connection formulae for heun functions , Communications in Mathematical Physics (2022) [2201.04491]

Show all 101 references
  1. [9]

    NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions

    “ NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions .” https://dlmf.nist.gov/, Release 1.2.4 of 2025-03-15

  2. [10]

    Litvinov, S

    A. Litvinov, S. Lukyanov, N. Nekrasov and A. Zamolodchikov, Classical Conformal Blocks and Painleve VI , JHEP 07 (2014) 144 [ 1309.4700]

  3. [11]

    Jeong and N

    S. Jeong and N. Nekrasov, Opers, surface defects, and Yang-Yang functional , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 24 (2020) 1789 [ 1806.08270]

  4. [12]

    Consoli, F

    D. Consoli, F. Fucito, J.F. Morales and R. Poghossian, CFT description of BH’s and ECO’s: QNMs, superradiance, echoes and tidal responses , JHEP 12 (2022) 115 [2206.09437]

  5. [13]

    Lisovyy and A

    O. Lisovyy and A. Naidiuk, Perturbative connection formulas for Heun equations , J. Phys. A 55 (2022) 434005 [ 2208.01604]

  6. [14]

    Alday, D

    L.F. Alday, D. Gaiotto and Y. Tachikawa, Liouville Correlation Functions from Four-dimensional Gauge Theories, Lett. Math. Phys. 91 (2010) 167 [ 0906.3219]

  7. [15]

    Le Floch, A slow review of the AGT correspondence , J

    B. Le Floch, A slow review of the AGT correspondence , J. Phys. A 55 (2022) 353002 [2006.14025]

  8. [16]

    Alday and Y

    L.F. Alday and Y. Tachikawa, Affine SL(2) conformal blocks from 4d gauge theories , Lett. Math. Phys. 94 (2010) 87 [ 1005.4469]

  9. [17]

    Nekrasov, Seiberg-Witten prepotential from instanton counting , Adv

    N.A. Nekrasov, Seiberg-Witten prepotential from instanton counting , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 7 (2003) 831 [ hep-th/0206161]

  10. [18]

    Nekrasov and S.L

    N.A. Nekrasov and S.L. Shatashvili, Quantization of Integrable Systems and Four Dimensional Gauge Theories , in 16th International Congress on Mathematical Physics , pp. 265–289, 8, 2009, DOI [ 0908.4052]. – 65 –

  11. [19]

    Bonelli, K

    G. Bonelli, K. Maruyoshi, A. Tanzini and F. Yagi, Generalized matrix models and AGT correspondence at all genera , JHEP 07 (2011) 055 [ 1011.5417]

  12. [20]

    Bonelli, K

    G. Bonelli, K. Maruyoshi and A. Tanzini, Quantum Hitchin Systems via β -Deformed Matrix Models, Commun. Math. Phys. 358 (2018) 1041 [ 1104.4016]

  13. [21]

    Piatek, Classical torus conformal block, N = 2∗ twisted superpotential and the accessory parameter of Lam´ e equation, JHEP 03 (2014) 124 [ 1309.7672]

    M. Piatek, Classical torus conformal block, N = 2∗ twisted superpotential and the accessory parameter of Lam´ e equation, JHEP 03 (2014) 124 [ 1309.7672]

  14. [22]

    Piatek and A.R

    M. Piatek and A.R. Pietrykowski, Classical limit of irregular blocks and Mathieu functions , JHEP 01 (2016) 115 [ 1509.08164]

  15. [23]

    Ba¸ sar and G.V

    G. Ba¸ sar and G.V. Dunne, Resurgence and the Nekrasov-Shatashvili limit: connecting weak and strong coupling in the Mathieu and Lam´ e systems, JHEP 02 (2015) 160 [ 1501.05671]

  16. [24]

    Desiraju, P

    H. Desiraju, P. Ghosal and A. Prokhorov, Proof of Zamolodchikov conjecture for semi-classical conformal blocks on the torus , 2407.05839

  17. [25]

    Beccaria and G

    M. Beccaria and G. Macorini, Exact partition functions for the Ω-deformed N = 2∗ SU(2) gauge theory, JHEP 07 (2016) 066 [ 1606.00179]

  18. [26]

    Beccaria, A

    M. Beccaria, A. Fachechi, G. Macorini and L. Martina, Exact partition functions for deformed N = 2 theories with Nf = 4 flavours, JHEP 12 (2016) 029 [ 1609.01189]

  19. [27]

    Beccaria, On the large Ω-deformations in the Nekrasov-Shatashvili limit of N = 2∗ SYM, JHEP 07 (2016) 055 [ 1605.00077]

    M. Beccaria, On the large Ω-deformations in the Nekrasov-Shatashvili limit of N = 2∗ SYM, JHEP 07 (2016) 055 [ 1605.00077]

  20. [28]

    Gorsky, A

    A. Gorsky, A. Milekhin and N. Sopenko, Bands and gaps in Nekrasov partition function , JHEP 01 (2018) 133 [ 1712.02936]

  21. [29]

    Nakajima and K

    H. Nakajima and K. Yoshioka, Lectures on instanton counting , in CRM Workshop on Algebraic Structures and Moduli Spaces , 11, 2003 [ math/0311058]

  22. [30]

    Bonelli, K

    G. Bonelli, K. Maruyoshi and A. Tanzini, Instantons on ALE spaces and Super Liouville Conformal Field Theories , JHEP 08 (2011) 056 [ 1106.2505]

  23. [31]

    Bonelli, K

    G. Bonelli, K. Maruyoshi and A. Tanzini, Gauge Theories on ALE Space and Super Liouville Correlation Functions , Lett. Math. Phys. 101 (2012) 103 [ 1107.4609]

  24. [32]

    Bershtein, P

    M. Bershtein, P. Gavrylenko and A. Grassi, Quantum Spectral Problems and Isomonodromic Deformations, Commun. Math. Phys. 393 (2022) 347 [ 2105.00985]

  25. [33]

    Jeong, Splitting of surface defect partition functions and integrable systems , Nucl

    S. Jeong, Splitting of surface defect partition functions and integrable systems , Nucl. Phys. B 938 (2019) 775 [ 1709.04926]

  26. [34]

    Belavin and B

    V. Belavin and B. Feigin, Super Liouville conformal blocks from N=2 SU(2) quiver gauge theories, JHEP 07 (2011) 079 [ 1105.5800]

  27. [35]

    Belavin, M.A

    A.A. Belavin, M.A. Bershtein and G.M. Tarnopolsky, Bases in coset conformal field theory from AGT correspondence and Macdonald polynomials at the roots of unity , JHEP 03 (2013) 019 [ 1211.2788]

  28. [36]

    Bonelli, F

    G. Bonelli, F. Globlek and A. Tanzini, Counting Yang-Mills Instantons by Surface Operator Renormalization Group Flow , Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 231602 [ 2102.01627]

  29. [37]

    Bonelli, F

    G. Bonelli, F. Globlek and A. Tanzini, Toda equations for surface defects in SYM and instanton counting for classical Lie groups , J. Phys. A 55 (2022) 454004 [ 2206.13212]

  30. [38]

    Nagoya, Irregular conformal blocks, with an application to the fifth and fourth Painlev´ e equations, J

    H. Nagoya, Irregular conformal blocks, with an application to the fifth and fourth Painlev´ e equations, J. Math. Phys. 56 (2015) 123505 [ 1505.02398]. – 66 –

  31. [39]

    Bonelli, O

    G. Bonelli, O. Lisovyy, K. Maruyoshi, A. Sciarappa and A. Tanzini, On Painlev´ e/gauge theory correspondence, Lett. Math. Phys. 107 (2017) pages 2359 [ 1612.06235]

  32. [40]

    Nagoya, Conformal blocks and Painlev´ e functions, 1611.08971

    H. Nagoya, Conformal blocks and Painlev´ e functions, 1611.08971

  33. [41]

    Nagoya, Remarks on irregular conformal blocks and Painlev´ e III and II tau functions , 1804.04782

    H. Nagoya, Remarks on irregular conformal blocks and Painlev´ e III and II tau functions , 1804.04782

  34. [42]

    Gavrylenko, A

    P. Gavrylenko, A. Marshakov and A. Stoyan, Irregular conformal blocks, Painlev´ e III and the blow-up equations , JHEP 12 (2020) 125 [ 2006.15652]

  35. [43]

    Fucito, J.F

    F. Fucito, J.F. Morales and R. Poghossian, On irregular states and Argyres-Douglas theories, JHEP 08 (2023) 123 [ 2306.05127]

  36. [44]

    Poghosyan and R

    H. Poghosyan and R. Poghossian, A note on rank 5/2 Liouville irregular block, Painlev´ e I and the H0 Argyres-Douglas theory, JHEP 11 (2023) 198 [ 2308.09623]

  37. [45]

    Bonelli, P

    G. Bonelli, P. Gavrylenko, I. Majtara and A. Tanzini, Surface observables in gauge theories, modular Painlev´ e tau functions and non-perturbative topological strings, 2410.17868

  38. [46]

    Bonelli, A

    G. Bonelli, A. Shchechkin and A. Tanzini, Refined Painlev´ e/gauge theory correspondence and quantum tau functions , 2502.01499

  39. [47]

    Poghossian and H

    R. Poghossian and H. Poghosyan, A note on rank 3 2 Liouville irregular block , 2502.10169

  40. [48]

    Iorgov, K

    N. Iorgov, K. Iwaki, O. Lisovyy and Y. Zhuravlov, Many-faced Painlev´ e I: irregular conformal blocks, topological recursion, and holomorphic anomaly approaches , 2505.16803

  41. [49]

    Fucito, J.F

    F. Fucito, J.F. Morales, R. Poghossian and A. Tanzini, N=1 superpotentials from multi-instanton calculus, JHEP 01 (2006) 031 [ hep-th/0510173]

  42. [50]

    Bonelli, S

    G. Bonelli, S. Giacomelli, K. Maruyoshi and A. Tanzini, N=1 Geometries via M-theory , JHEP 10 (2013) 227 [ 1307.7703]

  43. [51]

    Nakajima and K

    H. Nakajima and K. Yoshioka, Instanton counting on blowup. II. K-theoretic partition function, math/0505553

  44. [52]

    Bershtein and A.I

    M.A. Bershtein and A.I. Shchechkin, q-deformed Painlev´ eτ function and q-deformed conformal blocks, J. Phys. A 50 (2017) 085202 [ 1608.02566]

  45. [53]

    Bonelli, A

    G. Bonelli, A. Grassi and A. Tanzini, Quantum curves and q-deformed Painlev´ e equations, Lett. Math. Phys. 109 (2019) 1961 [ 1710.11603]

  46. [54]

    Bershtein, P

    M. Bershtein, P. Gavrylenko and A. Marshakov, Cluster integrable systems, q-Painlev´ e equations and their quantization , JHEP 02 (2018) 077 [ 1711.02063]

  47. [55]

    Bonelli, F

    G. Bonelli, F. Del Monte and A. Tanzini, BPS Quivers of Five-Dimensional SCFTs, Topological Strings and q-Painlev´ e Equations, Annales Henri Poincare 22 (2021) 2721 [2007.11596]

  48. [56]

    Bershtein, P

    M. Bershtein, P. Gavrylenko and A. Marshakov, Cluster Toda chains and Nekrasov functions, Theor. Math. Phys. 198 (2019) 157 [ 1804.10145]

  49. [57]

    Gavrylenko, Riemann-Hilbert problems, Fredholm determinants, explicit combinatorial expansions, and connection formulas for the general q-Painlev´ e III3 tau functions , 2501.01419

    P. Gavrylenko, Riemann-Hilbert problems, Fredholm determinants, explicit combinatorial expansions, and connection formulas for the general q-Painlev´ e III3 tau functions , 2501.01419

  50. [58]

    Sciarappa, Bethe/Gauge correspondence in odd dimension: modular double, non-perturbative corrections and open topological strings, JHEP 10 (2016) 014 [1606.01000]

    A. Sciarappa, Bethe/Gauge correspondence in odd dimension: modular double, non-perturbative corrections and open topological strings, JHEP 10 (2016) 014 [1606.01000]. – 67 –

  51. [59]

    Grassi and M

    A. Grassi and M. Marino, The complex side of the TS/ST correspondence , J. Phys. A 52 (2019) 055402 [ 1708.08642]

  52. [60]

    Wang, Wilson loops, holomorphic anomaly equations and blowup equations , 2305.09171

    X. Wang, Wilson loops, holomorphic anomaly equations and blowup equations , 2305.09171

  53. [61]

    Lukyanov, Critical values of the Yang-Yang functional in the quantum sine-Gordon model, Nucl

    S.L. Lukyanov, Critical values of the Yang-Yang functional in the quantum sine-Gordon model, Nucl. Phys. B 853 (2011) 475 [ 1105.2836]

  54. [62]

    Fioravanti and D

    D. Fioravanti and D. Gregori, Integrability and cycles of deformed N = 2 gauge theory, Phys. Lett. B 804 (2020) 135376 [ 1908.08030]

  55. [63]

    Alkalaev and V.A

    K.B. Alkalaev and V.A. Belavin, Holographic duals of large-c torus conformal blocks , JHEP 10 (2017) 140 [ 1707.09311]

  56. [64]

    Alkalaev and V.A

    K.B. Alkalaev and V.A. Belavin, Holographic interpretation of 1-point toroidal block in the semiclassical limit, JHEP 06 (2016) 183 [ 1603.08440]

  57. [65]

    Alekseev, A

    S. Alekseev, A. Gorsky and M. Litvinov, Toward the Pole, JHEP 03 (2020) 157 [1911.01334]

  58. [66]

    Greene, L

    P.B. Greene, L. Kofman, A.D. Linde and A.A. Starobinsky, Structure of resonance in preheating after inflation , Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 6175 [ hep-ph/9705347]

  59. [67]

    M.A. Amin, R. Easther, H. Finkel, R. Flauger and M.P. Hertzberg, Oscillons After Inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 241302 [ 1106.3335]

  60. [68]

    Iorgov, O

    N. Iorgov, O. Lisovyy and J. Teschner, Isomonodromic tau-functions from Liouville conformal blocks, Commun. Math. Phys. 336 (2015) 671 [ 1401.6104]

  61. [69]

    Itzykson and J.B

    C. Itzykson and J.B. Zuber, Two-Dimensional Conformal Invariant Theories on a Torus , Nucl. Phys. B 275 (1986) 580

  62. [70]

    Bonelli, F

    G. Bonelli, F. Del Monte, P. Gavrylenko and A. Tanzini, N = 2∗ Gauge Theory, Free Fermions on the Torus and Painlev´ e VI, Commun. Math. Phys. 377 (2020) 1381 [1901.10497]

  63. [71]

    Hadasz, Z

    L. Hadasz, Z. Jaskolski and P. Suchanek, Recursive representation of the torus 1-point conformal block, JHEP 01 (2010) 063 [ 0911.2353]

  64. [72]

    M. Cho, S. Collier and X. Yin, Recursive Representations of Arbitrary Virasoro Conformal Blocks, JHEP 04 (2019) 018 [ 1703.09805]

  65. [73]

    Moore and N

    G.W. Moore and N. Seiberg, Classical and Quantum Conformal Field Theory , Commun. Math. Phys. 123 (1989) 177

  66. [74]

    Zamolodchikov and A.B

    A.B. Zamolodchikov and A.B. Zamolodchikov, Structure constants and conformal bootstrap in Liouville field theory , Nucl. Phys. B 477 (1996) 577 [ hep-th/9506136]

  67. [75]

    Desiraju, private communication,

    H. Desiraju, private communication,

  68. [76]

    Wang and D.R

    Z.X. Wang and D.R. Guo, Special Functions, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore (1989)

  69. [77]

    Gaiotto, Asymptotically free N = 2 theories and irregular conformal blocks , J

    D. Gaiotto, Asymptotically free N = 2 theories and irregular conformal blocks , J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 462 (2013) 012014 [ 0908.0307]

  70. [78]

    Nekrasov and A

    N. Nekrasov and A. Okounkov, Seiberg-Witten theory and random partitions , Prog. Math. 244 (2006) 525 [ hep-th/0306238]

  71. [79]

    Nakajima and K

    H. Nakajima and K. Yoshioka, Instanton counting on blowup. 1. , Invent. Math. 162 (2005) 313 [math/0306198]. – 68 –

  72. [80]

    Jeong and N

    S. Jeong and N. Nekrasov, Riemann-Hilbert correspondence and blown up surface defects , JHEP 12 (2020) 006 [ 2007.03660]

  73. [81]

    Bershtein, B

    M. Bershtein, B. Feigin and A. Litvinov, Coupling of two conformal field theories and Nakajima-Yoshioka blow-up equations, Lett. Math. Phys. 106 (2016) 29 [ 1310.7281]

  74. [82]

    Shchechkin, Blowup relations on C2/Z2 from Nakajima–Yoshioka blowup relations , Teor

    A. Shchechkin, Blowup relations on C2/Z2 from Nakajima–Yoshioka blowup relations , Teor. Mat. Fiz. 206 (2021) 225 [ 2006.08582]

  75. [83]

    Bonelli, F

    G. Bonelli, F. Del Monte, P. Gavrylenko and A. Tanzini, Circular quiver gauge theories, isomonodromic deformations and WN fermions on the torus , Lett. Math. Phys. 111 (2021) 83 [1909.07990]

  76. [84]

    Logarithimic Painlev´ e functions and Mathieu stability chart

    M. Bershtein, P. Gavrylenko, O. Lisovyy and Y. Zhuravlov, “Logarithimic Painlev´ e functions and Mathieu stability chart.” to appear

  77. [85]

    Logarithmic Painlev´ e functions and Mathieu stability chart

    O. Lisovyy, “Logarithmic Painlev´ e functions and Mathieu stability chart.” https://indico.sissa.it/event/41/contributions/741/attachments/300/390/ Lisovyi-Dubrovin-2021.pdf, June, 2021

  78. [86]

    Logarithmic Painlev´ e functions and Mathieu stability chart

    O. Lisovyy, “Logarithmic Painlev´ e functions and Mathieu stability chart.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_onGDVsnTvI, July, 2023

  79. [87]

    Seiberg and E

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Electric - magnetic duality, monopole condensation, and confinement in N=2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory , Nucl. Phys. B 426 (1994) 19 [hep-th/9407087]

  80. [88]

    Seiberg and E

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Monopoles, duality and chiral symmetry breaking in N=2 supersymmetric QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 431 (1994) 484 [ hep-th/9408099]

  81. [89]

    Nekrasov, BPS/CFT correspondence IV: sigma models and defects in gauge theory , Lett

    N. Nekrasov, BPS/CFT correspondence IV: sigma models and defects in gauge theory , Lett. Math. Phys. 109 (2019) 579 [ 1711.11011]

  82. [90]

    Nekrasov, BPS/CFT correspondence V: BPZ and KZ equations from qq-characters , 1711.11582

    N. Nekrasov, BPS/CFT correspondence V: BPZ and KZ equations from qq-characters , 1711.11582

  83. [91]

    Alday, D

    L.F. Alday, D. Gaiotto, S. Gukov, Y. Tachikawa and H. Verlinde, Loop and surface operators in N=2 gauge theory and Liouville modular geometry , JHEP 01 (2010) 113 [ 0909.0945]

  84. [92]

    Kanno and Y

    H. Kanno and Y. Tachikawa, Instanton counting with a surface operator and the chain-saw quiver, JHEP 06 (2011) 119 [ 1105.0357]

  85. [93]

    Bershtein and A

    M. Bershtein and A. Shchechkin, Painlev´ e equations from Nakajima–Yoshioka blowup relations, Lett. Math. Phys. 109 (2019) 2359 [ 1811.04050]

  86. [94]

    Bruzzo, F

    U. Bruzzo, F. Fucito, J.F. Morales and A. Tanzini, Multiinstanton calculus and equivariant cohomology, JHEP 05 (2003) 054 [ hep-th/0211108]

  87. [95]

    Flume and R

    R. Flume and R. Poghossian, An Algorithm for the microscopic evaluation of the coefficients of the Seiberg-Witten prepotential , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 18 (2003) 2541 [ hep-th/0208176]

  88. [96]

    S. Katz, P. Mayr and C. Vafa, Mirror symmetry and exact solution of 4-D N=2 gauge theories: 1. , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 1 (1998) 53 [ hep-th/9706110]

  89. [97]

    Gaiotto, N=2 dualities , JHEP 08 (2012) 034 [ 0904.2715]

    D. Gaiotto, N=2 dualities , JHEP 08 (2012) 034 [ 0904.2715]

  90. [98]

    Nekrasov and V

    N. Nekrasov and V. Pestun, Seiberg-Witten Geometry of Four-Dimensional N = 2 Quiver Gauge Theories, SIGMA 19 (2023) 047 [ 1211.2240]. – 69 –

  91. [99]

    Volkmer, Four remarks on the eigenvalues of lam´ e’s equation, Analysis and Applications 02 (2004) 161

    H. Volkmer, Four remarks on the eigenvalues of lam´ e’s equation, Analysis and Applications 02 (2004) 161

  92. [100]

    Fl¨ ugge,Practical Quantum Mechanics, vol

    S. Fl¨ ugge,Practical Quantum Mechanics, vol. 1 of Classics in Mathematics , Springer Berlin, Heidelberg (1998), 10.1007/978-3-642-61995-3

  93. [101]

    Poghossian, Recursion relations in CFT and N=2 SYM theory , JHEP 12 (2009) 038 [0909.3412]

    R. Poghossian, Recursion relations in CFT and N=2 SYM theory , JHEP 12 (2009) 038 [0909.3412]. – 70 –

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.