Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 5 cited by

SymTFT Approach for Mixed States with Non-Invertible Symmetries

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Gapped mixed states with non-invertible symmetries are classified by gapped boundaries of a doubled SymTFT, with hermiticity and positivity selecting the valid density matrices.

desk verdict A genuinely new SymTFT framework for mixed states with non-invertible symmetries, with clean necessary constraints and rich examples, but the classification rests on a sufficiency conjecture that the paper itself leaves open. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.05350 v1 pith:52MXDC2Q submitted 2025-07-07 quant-ph cond-mat.str-elhep-th

Sakura Schafer-Nameki , Apoorv Tiwari , Alison Warman , Carolyn Zhang This is my paper
classification quant-phcond-mat.str-elhep-th
keywords mixedstatesstrongandweaksymmetriesnon-invertibleSymTFTChoistateSWSSBsymmetry-protectedtopologicalphasesanyonchains
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a systematic classification of gapped phases of density matrices with strong or weak symmetries, including non-invertible categorical symmetries, in 1+1d. The method purifies the density matrix into a Choi state on a doubled Hilbert space and asks which gapped phases of that doubled system come from actual density matrices. The answer proposed here is that the physical boundary of the SymTFT for the doubled symmetry $S_L \boxtimes S_R$ must be a Lagrangian algebra obeying two extra conditions: invariance under the swap-conjugation operation $T$ and a positivity inequality linking diagonal and off-diagonal anyon multiplicities. The paper conjectures these conditions are necessary and sufficient, and uses them to classify strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking (SWSSB), strong/weak SPTs, and examples with weak non-invertible duality and strong invertible symmetry. If correct, mixed-state gapped phases with categorical symmetry are as tractable as pure-state phases, with explicit lattice realizations for each phase.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Symmetry Topological Field Theory (SymTFT), a 2+1d topological order whose gapped boundaries encode 1+1d symmetric gapped phases. For mixed states the relevant theory is the doubled SymTFT $Z(S_L \boxtimes S_R)$, and the new object is a mixed-state Lagrangian algebra: a gapped boundary $L=\oplus n_{a_L,b_R}\, a_L b_R$ satisfying $T$-invariance $n_{a_L,b_R}=n_{b_L,a_R}$ and positivity $n_{a_L,b_R}\le n_{a_L,a_R}n_{b_L,b_R}$. Anyon lines $a_L b_R$ that end on both boundaries produce order and disorder parameters, and requiring the line to be $T$-invariant selects the subset that gives valid Choi states. Weak symmetries are handled by starting from the doubled strong symmetry and condensing a condensable algebra of diagonal charges, which reduces the center and turns some strong symmetries into weak ones; the same two conditions constrain these mixed-state condensable algebras.

What would settle it

Take a Lagrangian algebra $L$ in $Z(S_L\boxtimes S_R)$ that satisfies both inequalities, form the traced Choi state $\rho_L=\mathrm{Tr}_R(|\rho_L\rangle\rangle\langle\langle\rho_L|)$, and check the patch-operator identity for every anyon $a_L b_R$ in $L$: if the expectation value in the Choi state differs from the corresponding trace expression with $\rho_L$, the sufficiency conjecture fails. A single such algebra, checked in a small category such as Ising $\boxtimes$ Ising, would settle the conjecture.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the SymTFT approach to gapped phases can be lifted from pure states to mixed states by working with the Choi-Jamiolkowski purification. For a strong fusion-category symmetry $S$, the Choi state carries $S_L \boxtimes S_R$ symmetry, so gapped mixed-state phases should correspond to gapped boundaries of the SymTFT $Z(S_L \boxtimes S_R)$. Not every gapped boundary is physical: the boundary algebra $L = \oplus n_{a_L,b_R}\, a_L b_R$ must be invariant under the anti-unitary swap $T$, giving $n_{a_L,b_R}=n_{b_L,a_R}$, and must satisfy $n_{a_L,b_R} \le n_{a_L,a_R} n_{b_L,b_R}$, which follows from positivity of the reduced density matrix. The paper calls such boundaries mixed-state Lagrangian algebras and conjectures that the two conditions are necessary and sufficient. On this basis it derives SWSSB phases, pure-state SPT limits, mixed strong-weak SPT phases, and the rule that a non-invertible symmetry cannot be made entirely weak but only partially, with the invertible part remaining strong.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a gapped mixed-state phase is faithfully represented by its gapped Choi state, with fixed-point density matrices proportional to their square roots, so that the phase of the purified doubled state is the phase of the density matrix; the claimed sufficiency of the two algebraic conditions is an additional conjecture.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any finite fusion-category symmetry $S$, the gapped strong-symmetric mixed phases are indexed by $T$-invariant, positive Lagrangian algebras of $Z(S_L\boxtimes S_R)$; the paper works this out for $Z_2$, $Z_2\times Z_2$, $S_3$, $\mathrm{Rep}(S_3)$, and Ising.
  • Strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking appears when the physical boundary contains diagonal gauge charges but no off-diagonal order parameters: the strong symmetry is broken, the weak symmetry survives, and the phase is not two-way channel connected to a symmetric product state.
  • Non-invertible symmetries cannot be made purely weak; a consistent pattern requires the invertible subgroup to remain strong, as in weak Kramers-Wannier duality with strong $Z_2$.
  • Mixed strong-weak SPT phases exist and are detected by string order parameters; one explicit example has strong $Z_2\times Z_2$ with weak duality, where one $Z_2$ forms an SPT with the duality while the other undergoes SWSSB.
  • The fixed-point density matrices of these phases can be written explicitly as products of commuting projectors, so each classified phase has a concrete lattice realization.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the sufficiency conjecture is right, classification reduces to a purely algebraic enumeration: for any fusion category, list the Lagrangian algebras of the doubled center and keep those obeying the two inequalities, a procedure that could be automated for small categories.
  • The positivity inequality is a Cauchy-Schwarz type constraint on the matrix $n_{a_L,b_R}$; reading it as a quantum-information bound suggests that symmetric local quantum channels act as a renormalization flow on Lagrangian algebras, giving a mixed-state analogue of gapped phase diagrams.
  • The paper notes that higher-form and emergent symmetries may not align with two-way channel-connectivity definitions; a concrete extension is to compare the SymTFT classification with channel-connectivity classes in 1-form symmetric mixed states to locate where the two notions diverge.
  • The obstruction to fully weak non-invertible symmetries appears to follow from fusion outputs: non-invertible fusion products must be strong symmetries for consistency, suggesting a fusion-rule test for which symmetry patterns are realizable without invoking any TQFT.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper develops a SymTFT framework for classifying gapped mixed-state phases with strong and weak categorical (possibly non-invertible) symmetries. The central idea is to purify a mixed state into a Choi state in a doubled Hilbert space and to classify its gapped phases via Lagrangian algebras of the Drinfeld center Z(S_L ⊠ S_R). The authors identify two algebraic conditions on these algebras — T-invariance, n_{aL,bR}=n_{bL,aR}, and positivity, n_{aL,bR} ≤ n_{aL,aR} n_{bL,bR} — and prove that they are necessary for Hermitian positive density matrices, while conjecturing sufficiency. The framework is applied in 1+1d to obtain phase classifications for strong Z2, Z2×Z2, S3, Rep(S3), and Ising symmetries, including SWSSB phases and strong/weak SPTs. Weak non-invertible symmetries are treated by starting from a larger strong symmetry and condensing diagonal charges, with examples involving weak Kramers-Wannier duality and strong Z2 (Rep(H8)). The continuum SymTFT analysis is complemented by explicit anyon-chain lattice models and density-matrix constructions.

Significance. This is a substantial and well-organized framework paper. Its clean derivation of necessary conditions from Hermiticity and positivity via the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality (Sec. III.B.1, Eq. (III.18)) is a genuine structural advance, and the examples cover a much broader range than previous group-symmetric treatments: non-abelian and non-invertible strong symmetries, mixed strong-weak non-invertible symmetries, and concrete lattice models with explicit density matrices and correlator diagnostics (e.g., Eqs. (V.19), (V.29), (VI.85)-(VI.87)). The paper contains no fitted parameters and the fixed-point constructions are explicit and reproducible. If the conjectural sufficiency of (III.16)-(III.17) and the identification with gapped Choi phases are established, this would provide a systematic classification of SWSSB and strong/weak SPT phases for categorical symmetries. As it stands, the classification is conditional on those two unproved steps, and the manuscript's own Section VI.C.3 shows a concrete place where the algebraic conditions alone may overcount physical phases.

major comments (3)
  1. [III.B.1, III.C] The sufficiency of conditions (III.16) and (III.17) is load-bearing, not a technicality. Sections V and VI enumerate as physical phases every Lagrangian algebra satisfying these two inequalities, but the proof is only sketched in Sec. III.C, and the key identity (III.31) is exactly what must be checked to show that the traced interval state is a valid fixed-point Choi state. The paper does not verify (III.31) for any of the listed non-factorized algebras. More seriously, Sec. VI.C.3 explicitly states that the Rep(H8) SPT associated with L6 satisfies (III.16)-(III.17), yet the natural qubit realization is a cluster state that is not the Choi state of any Hermitian positive density matrix, because the equivalent Z2×Z2 Lagrangian algebra 1+e_L m_R+e_R m_L+e_L e_R m_L m_R violates (III.17). The authors assert that an anyon-chain construction in a larger Hilbert space should produce a valid Choi state, but no such state or density matrix is exhibited. Unless sufficiency is proved with the Hilbert-space data made explicit, or the classification is explicitly restricted to Hilbert spaces for which the construction is known to work, the classification may contain spurious phases.
  2. [II.B, III.B, VII] The identification of mixed-state gapped phases with gapped phases of the normalized Choi state is a substantive modeling assumption. The paper defines gapped mixed states as those whose Choi states admit gapped parent Hamiltonians, and uses the fact that fixed-point density matrices satisfy ρ ∝ √ρ to replace the canonical purification by the Choi state. This identification is not derived, and generic interpolations between fixed points will not share the property ρ ∝ √ρ. The discussion in Sec. VII acknowledges a mismatch with two-way channel connectivity definitions for higher-form symmetries, but the same concern applies in the 0-form setting: a Choi-state gapped phase need not coincide with a mixed-state phase defined by two-way local channels. The authors should either prove the equivalence for the class of states they classify or state explicitly that the classification is of Choi gapped phases and justify why that is the physically relevant notion. As written, the framework could overcount or undercount physical phases relative to other established definitions.
  3. [VI.A.3] The construction of weak non-invertible symmetries by condensing diagonal charges is a central ingredient of the mixed strong-weak classification, but it is presented as a proposal rather than a theorem. The paper states that 'all partial bulk condensations of diagonal charges in SymTFTs of the form Z(S_L)⊠Z(S_R) give rise to consistent patterns of strong and weak non-invertible symmetries,' yet it does not prove exhaustiveness, and the consistency condition (VI.8) is only a necessary condition from fusion rules. The mixed strong-weak SPT classification in Sec. VI.D is derived entirely within this extension-and-condensation construction. The authors should either prove that every consistent strong-weak pattern arises this way, or clearly mark the resulting classification as valid only for the patterns constructible by this method. Otherwise, the claim of a 'systematic classification' in the abstract is stronger than what is established.
minor comments (3)
  1. [V.E.3] In the paragraph beginning 'We now consider the physical boundary to have L 2 condensed,' the sandwich (V.80) and the associated eF=Z_diag_2 correspond to L3, not L2; this labeling typo should be corrected.
  2. [V.A.2, VI.C] There are several typographical slips, including 'tgrangian algebras' in Sec. V.A.2 and 'te symmetry boundary' in Sec. VI.C; these should be corrected in a final pass.
  3. [III.B.1] The notation n_{aL,bR} is used both for the multiplicity of an anyon in the Lagrangian algebra and for the number of patch operators, and the identification is implicit; a brief sentence clarifying that these two notions coincide in the fixed-point construction would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: mixed-state constraints are derived from Hermiticity and positivity, with the sufficiency claim explicitly conjectured rather than assumed.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The central conditions (III.16) and (III.17) are obtained from the Hermiticity and positivity of the density matrix via the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality (III.18), not from the phase classification being proposed. The SymTFT and Lagrangian-algebra machinery is used as standard TQFT input, and even where the paper leans on the authors' prior pure-state SymTFT papers, those are tools for constructing and reviewing the framework rather than assumptions of the mixed-state conclusion. The self-citation to [70] for the list of condensable algebras in Z(Rep(H8)) is a technical input for worked examples, not the foundation of the central claim. The paper explicitly flags its main gap: the sufficiency of (III.16) and (III.17) is conjectured, and Sec. III.C states that condition (III.31) still has to be checked, ending with "We leave this for future work." This is an unproved conjecture that may cause overcounting or undercounting of phases, as the Rep(H8) cluster-state issue in Sec. VI.C.3 illustrates, but that is a correctness risk rather than circularity. No fitted parameters are renamed as predictions, no target result is defined into existence by the classification, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' earlier work to forbid alternatives.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numerical constants are fitted to data in this paper. The framework uses categorical data as inputs and derives phases; the main ad hoc element is the sufficiency conjecture, which is not a fitted parameter. No new particles, forces, dimensions, or conserved quantities are introduced. 'Mixed-state Lagrangian algebra' is a definitional concept, not a physical entity.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Gapped mixed states are defined via gapped Choi states, i.e., a mixed state is gapped iff its canonical purification has a gapped local parent Hamiltonian.
    Sections I and III.B. This equivalence is the bridge that lets the mixed-state problem be classified by pure states in the doubled Hilbert space; if the true mixed-state phase definition disagrees, the classification could miss or include different phases.
  • standard math Finite fusion category symmetries admit a SymTFT with gapped boundaries classified by Lagrangian algebras in the Drinfeld center.
    Invoked throughout Section III.A and used for all examples. This is the prior pure-state SymTFT framework, cited to [7,8] rather than re-derived.
  • domain assumption At fixed points, rho is proportional to sqrt(rho), so the normalized Choi state and canonical purification coincide.
    Section II.B states this for fixed-point density matrices. It justifies using the Choi state rather than the canonical purification in the SymTFT interval construction.
  • ad hoc to paper The T-invariance and positivity conditions (III.16) and (III.17) are sufficient for a Lagrangian algebra to correspond to a positive Hermitian density matrix.
    This is the main structural conjecture, stated in Section III.B.1 and left open in Section III.C. The paper proves necessity but not sufficiency, so the classification is conditional on it.
  • ad hoc to paper All consistent patterns of strong and weak non-invertible symmetries can be obtained by starting from a larger strong symmetry and partially condensing diagonal charges.
    Proposed in Section VI and identified in Section VII as an open question. The strong/weak examples depend on this construction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of SymTFT Approach for Mixed States with Non-Invertible Symmetries." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/52MXDC2Q

@misc{pith2026250705350,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: SymTFT Approach for Mixed States with Non-Invertible Symmetries},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/52MXDC2Q}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.05350}
}
abstract

We develop a general framework for studying phases of mixed states with strong and weak symmetries, including non-invertible or categorical symmetries. The central idea is to consider a purification of the mixed state density matrix, which lives in a doubled Hilbert space. We propose a systematic classification of phases in this doubled Hilbert space, relying crucially on the Symmetry Topological Field Theory (SymTFT) approach. This framework applies not only to group symmetries but also, importantly, to non-invertible symmetries. We illustrate the approach in 1+1d to classify phases with strong (non-)invertible symmetries, which include strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking (SWSSB) phases and mixed strong/weak symmetry-protected topological phases (SPTs). We also develop an approach for studying symmetries that involve a combination of strong and weak symmetries. A noteworthy example of this has weak non-invertible Kramers-Wannier duality symmetry and strong $\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetry. The continuum description is complemented by a lattice model analysis informed by the SymTFT framework.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.05350 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. SymTFT for mixed states with strong symmetry [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. SymTFT for Mixed States with weak and strong [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The relation between the anyon chain (realized in a SymTFT picture on the LHS) and the standard SymTFT (RHS). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Exploring Entropic Orders: High Temperature Continuous Symmetry Breaking, Chiral Topological States and Local Commuting Projector Models

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    New analytic constructions yield quantum lattice models with continuous symmetry breaking and chiral topological order at arbitrarily high temperatures via entropic stabilization.

  2. SymTFT actions, Condensable algebras and Categorical anomaly resolutions

    hep-th 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For Q8 and Rep(Q8), the paper computes condensable algebras, identifies intrinsically gapless SPT phases, and derives fusion-category short exact sequences that resolve categorical anomalies.

  3. Entropic order parameters and topological holography

    hep-th 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using SymTFT, the entropic order parameter for a symmetry-breaking vacuum labelled by a equals log(dim C / d_a^2), making the distinguishability of non-invertible vacua manifest.

  4. Sandwich Construction of Symmetry TFTs for the Centre Symmetries of Chern-Simons, Yang-Mills, and Einstein Gravity

    hep-th 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Constructs AKSZ sandwich SymTFTs with stacky target spaces that encode the center symmetries of Chern-Simons, Yang-Mills, and MacDowell-Mansouri gravity.

  5. Information Loss in Generalized Symmetry Breaking

    quant-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Anyon condensation is encoded as a conditional expectation between operator algebras, and the information it erases, measured by relative entropy, is claimed to be bounded by the log of the condensate's quantum dimension.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

118 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Let us first discuss how to incorporate weak symme- tries when all of the symmetries are invertible

    Warmup: from strong to weak groups. Let us first discuss how to incorporate weak symme- tries when all of the symmetries are invertible. Instead of consideringS=Vec K ⊠Vec K andW=Vec G at the outset, and constructing the Drinfeld center for this sym- metry, we will begin with a larger symmetry and its cen- ter. This will allow for a more direct generaliza...

  2. [2]

    a condensable algebra of the form A=⊕ aLbR naLbR aLbR ,(VI.4) whereT(a L) =b R andn aLbR ̸= 0 only ifn aLbR,sym ̸= 0

    From Strong to Weak Categories We again start withZ(S L ⊠S R), with the strong sym- metry boundary conditionB sym =L strong S and Lstrong S =L S,L ⊗ LcS,R = M aLbR naLbR,sym aLbR .(VI.3) We then condense diagonal charges, i.e. a condensable algebra of the form A=⊕ aLbR naLbR aLbR ,(VI.4) whereT(a L) =b R andn aLbR ̸= 0 only ifn aLbR,sym ̸= 0. This means t...

  3. [3]

    diagonal

    Weak Symmetry Alone Let us consider the simplest case of having just a weak symmetryW. The first important conclusion that we will reach is that we cannot make a non-invertible sym- metry category completely weak. Later on, we will dis- cuss more intricate symmetries, with weak non-invertible symmetries and strong invertible symmetries, that form a single...

  4. [4]

    WeakZ 2 Symmetry LetW= Vec Z2 with no anomaly and start with Z(W L ⊠W R) which isZ 2 ×Z 2 gauge theory. We can condense the algebra Aweak Z2 = 1⊕e LeR .(VI.9) We thus have the following configuration (where we only show the club quiche with no physical boundary condi- tion in order to discuss the symmetry properties): 1 +e LeR 1 eL, eR e mLmR m mL, mR Awe...

  5. [5]

    StrongZ 2 and WeakZ 2 We now study the case where there is both a strong Z2 symmetry and a weakZ 2 symmetry. We can take the symmetries to have the following unitary representation on a 1+1d spin chain where each unit cell contains two qubits.U S acts on theSqubits andU W acts on theW qubits: US = Y i Xi,S UW = Y i Xi,W ,(VI.14) The twoZ 2 symmetries are ...

  6. [6]

    It is useful to illustrate this forG=S 3, the simplest non-abelian group

    WeakS 3 Symmetry Similarly, we can construct a weak invertible group- symmetry for any groupG. It is useful to illustrate this forG=S 3, the simplest non-abelian group. We start with the symmetry boundary that realizesS 3 ×S 3 LS3×S3 = (1⊕P⊕E) L ⊗(1⊕P⊕E) R .(VI.20) We do a partial anyon condensation with the algebra Aweak W=S 3 = 1⊕P LPR ⊕E LER ,(VI.21) w...

  7. [7]

    The key observation is that eachσ L/R (and barred) anyon will braid non-trivially with the anyon in the algebra and therefore will be con- fined

    Weak Kramers-Wannier and StrongZ 2 We condense the dimension 2 algebra Asw = 1⊕ψ LψLψRψR .(VI.28) Note thatψ ψis simply the dualZ 2 anyon that we obtain after gauging the em-duality in the toric code to get the Z(Ising) topological order. The key observation is that eachσ L/R (and barred) anyon will braid non-trivially with the anyon in the algebra and th...

  8. [8]

    fractional

    Gapped Mixed Phases with Weak Duality and StrongZ2 Now that we have the reduced TO andB sym, we can consider the possible choices ofB phys and the mean- ing of the corresponding phases. The condensable al- gebras forZ(Rep(H 8)) were determined in [70]. There are six Lagrangian condensable algebras, in the notation ofZ(TY(Z L 2 ×Z R 2 )): L1 = 1⊕X 1,−1 ⊕Y ...

Show all 118 references
  1. [9]

    infinite randomness fixed point,

    Lattice model: weak duality and strongZ2 For the mixed states obtained fromL 2 andL 5, we can work in a simpler setting consisting of a 1D chain of qubits with strongZ 2 symmetry action Q i Xi. The fusion rules of the duality operators in this setting are slightly modified. In...

  2. [10]

    Consider theTY(A) categories, which generalize theIsing=TY(Z 2) to an arbitrary abelian groupA

    General Weak Duality Symmetry We now provide a generalization of the story above to other abelian groups. Consider theTY(A) categories, which generalize theIsing=TY(Z 2) to an arbitrary abelian groupA. We summarize the salient features of these in Appendix A. TY(A) categories ...

  3. [11]

    (VI.72) Note that [ab] is charged only under the duality symme- tryEand is of dimension 1: it thus corresponds toX 1,−1 in theTYnotation

    [ab] [ca] [c] [a] 1: 1 1 1 1 1 1c: 1 1−1 1−1 1a: 1 1−1−1 1 1ca: 1 1 1−1−1 E: 2−2 0 0 0 (VI.71) where the conjugacy classes are [ab] ={ab},[a] ={a, b},[c] ={c, cab},[ca] ={ca, cb}. (VI.72) Note that [ab] is charged only under the duality symme- tryEand is of dimension 1: it thu...

  4. [12]

    emergent symmetries

    and describing a strongZ 2 ×Z 2 and weak duality symmetry sinceE LER is diagonal. All theD L 8 ×D R 8 conjugacy classes are also deconfined: since [ab]L[ab]R is condensed, in the reduced TO we will 21 A complementary approach based on the cluster state [71, 77] can only captur...

  5. [13]

    The Tambara- Yamagami (TY) fusion categoris are obtained fromAby considering the quantum double, i.e

    The Center of TY Categories LetAbe a finite abelian group. The Tambara- Yamagami (TY) fusion categoris are obtained fromAby considering the quantum double, i.e. the toric code, and gauging aZ 2 outer automorphism (e.g the em-duality). This gives the center ofTY(A). This has a ...

  6. [14]

    Lagrangian Algebras forZ 2 ×Z 2 Strong Symmetry The Lagrangian algebras for the analysis of theZ 2 ×Z 2 strong symmetric phases in Sec. V B are: L1 = 1⊕e A R ⊕m B L mB R ⊕m B L eA RmB R ⊕e A L ⊕e A L eA R ⊕e A L mB L mB R ⊕e A L mB L eA RmB R ⊕e B L eB R⊕ ⊕e B L eA ReB R ⊕e B ...

  7. [15]

    The Lagrangian algebras are written in equation (V.121)

    Condensable Algebras for Ising Table III summarizes the non-maximal mixed condensable algebras for strongIsingsymmetry. The Lagrangian algebras are written in equation (V.121). # dim Possible Condensable Algebra 1 1 1 2 2 1⊕ψ LψLψRψR 3 2 1⊕ψ LψR 4 2 1⊕ ψLψR 5 4 1⊕ψ LψR ⊕σ LψLσ...

  8. [16]

    Categorical symmetry and noninvertible anomaly in symmetry-breaking and topological phase transitions,

    W. Ji and X.-G. Wen, “Categorical symmetry and noninvertible anomaly in symmetry-breaking and topological phase transitions,”Phys. Rev. Res.2no. 3, (2020) 033417,arXiv:1912.13492 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2020 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Orbifold groupoids,

    D. Gaiotto and J. Kulp, “Orbifold groupoids,”JHEP 02(2021) 132,arXiv:2008.05960 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Symmetry TFTs from String Theory,

    F. Apruzzi, F. Bonetti, I. n. Garc ´ ıa Etxebarria, S. S. Hosseini, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Symmetry TFTs from String Theory,”Commun. Math. Phys.402 no. 1, (2023) 895–949,arXiv:2112.02092 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Topological symmetry in quantum field theory,

    D. S. Freed, G. W. Moore, and C. Teleman, “Topological symmetry in quantum field theory,” arXiv:2209.07471 [hep-th]. 46

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    ICTP lectures on (non-)invertible generalized symmetries,

    S. Schafer-Nameki, “ICTP lectures on (non-)invertible generalized symmetries,”Phys. Rept.1063(2024) 1–55,arXiv:2305.18296 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    What’s Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetry,

    S.-H. Shao, “What’s Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetry,” arXiv:2308.00747 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    Categorical Landau Paradigm for Gapped Phases,

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, D. Pajer, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Categorical Landau Paradigm for Gapped Phases,”Phys. Rev. Lett.133no. 16, (2024) 161601,arXiv:2310.03786 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Gapped phases with non-invertible symmetries: (1+1)d,

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, D. Pajer, and S. Sch¨ afer-Nameki, “Gapped phases with non-invertible symmetries: (1+1)d,”SciPost Phys.18 no. 1, (2025) 032,arXiv:2310.03784 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Lattice Models for Phases and Transitions with Non-Invertible Symmetries,

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Tiwari, “Lattice Models for Phases and Transitions with Non-Invertible Symmetries,”arXiv:2405.05964 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    Quantum Phases and Transitions in Spin Chains with Non-Invertible Symmetries,

    A. Chatterjee, O. M. Aksoy, and X.-G. Wen, “Quantum Phases and Transitions in Spin Chains with Non-Invertible Symmetries,”arXiv:2405.05331 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    Illustrating the Categorical Landau Paradigm in Lattice Models,

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Tiwari, “Illustrating the Categorical Landau Paradigm in Lattice Models,”arXiv:2405.05302 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    Categorical Symmetries in Spin Models with Atom Arrays,

    A. Warman, F. Yang, A. Tiwari, H. Pichler, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Categorical Symmetries in Spin Models with Atom Arrays,”arXiv:2412.15024 [cond-mat.str-el]

  20. [28]

    Phases with non-invertible symmetries in 1+1D symmetry protected topological orders as duality automorphisms,

    ¨O. M. Aksoy and X.-G. Wen, “Phases with non-invertible symmetries in 1+1D symmetry protected topological orders as duality automorphisms,”arXiv:2503.21764 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Construction of a Gapless Phase with Haagerup Symmetry,

    L. E. Bottini and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Construction of a Gapless Phase with Haagerup Symmetry,”Phys. Rev. Lett.134no. 19, (2025) 191602, arXiv:2410.19040 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Strange correlator and string order parameter for non-invertible symmetry protected topological phases in 1+1d,

    D.-C. Lu, F. Xu, and Y.-Z. You, “Strange correlator and string order parameter for non-invertible symmetry protected topological phases in 1+1d,” arXiv:2505.00673 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    Gapped Phases in (2+1)d with Non-Invertible Symmetries: Part I,

    L. Bhardwaj, D. Pajer, S. Schafer-Nameki, A. Tiwari, A. Warman, and J. Wu, “Gapped Phases in (2+1)d with Non-Invertible Symmetries: Part I,” arXiv:2408.05266 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    On ´Etale Algebras and Bosonic Fusion 2-Categories,

    H. Xu, “On ´Etale Algebras and Bosonic Fusion 2-Categories,”arXiv:2411.13367 [math.CT]

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    Towards All Categorical Symmetries in 2+1 Dimensions,

    M. Bullimore and J. J. Pearson, “Towards All Categorical Symmetries in 2+1 Dimensions,” arXiv:2408.13931 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    Gapped Phases in (2+1)d with Non-Invertible Symmetries: Part II,

    L. Bhardwaj, S. Schafer-Nameki, A. Tiwari, and A. Warman, “Gapped Phases in (2+1)d with Non-Invertible Symmetries: Part II,” arXiv:2502.20440 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    (2+1)d Lattice Models and Tensor Networks for Gapped Phases with Categorical Symmetry,

    K. Inamura, S.-J. Huang, A. Tiwari, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “(2+1)d Lattice Models and Tensor Networks for Gapped Phases with Categorical Symmetry,”arXiv:2506.09177 [cond-mat.str-el]

  28. [36]

    Holographic theory for continuous phase transitions: Emergence and symmetry protection of gaplessness,

    A. Chatterjee and X.-G. Wen, “Holographic theory for continuous phase transitions: Emergence and symmetry protection of gaplessness,”Phys. Rev. B 108no. 7, (2023) 075105,arXiv:2205.06244 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    The Club Sandwich: Gapless Phases and Phase Transitions with Non-Invertible Symmetries,

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, D. Pajer, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “The Club Sandwich: Gapless Phases and Phase Transitions with Non-Invertible Symmetries,”arXiv:2312.17322 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    Classification of 1+1D gapless symmetry protected phases via topological holography,

    R. Wen and A. C. Potter, “Classification of 1+1D gapless symmetry protected phases via topological holography,”arXiv:2311.00050 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    Hasse Diagrams for Gapless SPT and SSB Phases with Non-Invertible Symmetries,

    L. Bhardwaj, D. Pajer, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Warman, “Hasse Diagrams for Gapless SPT and SSB Phases with Non-Invertible Symmetries,” arXiv:2403.00905 [cond-mat.str-el]

  32. [40]

    String condensation and topological holography for 2+1D gapless SPT,

    R. Wen, “String condensation and topological holography for 2+1D gapless SPT,” arXiv:2408.05801 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    Gapless Phases in (2+1)d with Non-Invertible Symmetries,

    L. Bhardwaj, Y. Gai, S.-J. Huang, K. Inamura, S. Schafer-Nameki, A. Tiwari, and A. Warman, “Gapless Phases in (2+1)d with Non-Invertible Symmetries,”arXiv:2503.12699 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    Topological Holography for 2+1-D Gapped and Gapless Phases with Generalized Symmetries,

    R. Wen, “Topological Holography for 2+1-D Gapped and Gapless Phases with Generalized Symmetries,” arXiv:2503.13685 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    Classification of phases for mixed states via fast dissipative evolution,

    A. Coser and D. P´ erez-Garc ´ ıa, “Classification of phases for mixed states via fast dissipative evolution,” Quantum3(2019) 174

    2019

  36. [44]

    Symmetry protected topological order in open quantum systems,

    C. de Groot, A. Turzillo, and N. Schuch, “Symmetry protected topological order in open quantum systems,” Quantum6(2022) 856

    2022

  37. [45]

    Average symmetry-protected topological phases,

    R. Ma and C. Wang, “Average symmetry-protected topological phases,”Phys. Rev. X13(Aug, 2023) 031016

    2023

  38. [46]

    Symmetry protected topological phases under decoherence,

    J. Y. Lee, Y.-Z. You, and C. Xu, “Symmetry protected topological phases under decoherence,”Quantum9 (2025) 1607

    2025

  39. [47]

    Topological Phases with Average Symmetries: the Decohered, the Disordered, and the Intrinsic,

    R. Ma, J.-H. Zhang, Z. Bi, M. Cheng, and C. Wang, “Topological Phases with Average Symmetries: the Decohered, the Disordered, and the Intrinsic,” arXiv:2305.16399 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    Symmetry-enforced many-body separability transitions,

    Y.-H. Chen and T. Grover, “Symmetry-enforced many-body separability transitions,”PRX Quantum5 (Jul, 2024) 030310

    2024

  41. [49]

    Symmetry-Protected Topological Phases of Mixed States in the Doubled Space,

    R. Ma and A. Turzillo, “Symmetry-Protected Topological Phases of Mixed States in the Doubled Space,”PRX Quantum6no. 1, (2025) 010348, arXiv:2403.13280 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Spontaneous strong symmetry breaking in open systems: Purification perspective,

    P. Sala, S. Gopalakrishnan, M. Oshikawa, and Y. You, “Spontaneous strong symmetry breaking in open systems: Purification perspective,”Phys. Rev. B110 (Oct, 2024) 155150

    2024

  43. [51]

    Strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry 47 breaking in mixed quantum states,

    L. A. Lessa, R. Ma, J.-H. Zhang, Z. Bi, M. Cheng, and C. Wang, “Strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry 47 breaking in mixed quantum states,”PRX Quantum6 (Mar, 2025) 010344

    2025

  44. [52]

    Mixed-state quantum anomaly and multipartite entanglement,

    L. A. Lessa, M. Cheng, and C. Wang, “Mixed-state quantum anomaly and multipartite entanglement,” Phys. Rev. X15(Mar, 2025) 011069

    2025

  45. [53]

    Anomaly in open quantum systems and its implications on mixed-state quantum phases,

    Z. Wang and L. Li, “Anomaly in open quantum systems and its implications on mixed-state quantum phases,”PRX Quantum6(Mar, 2025) 010347

    2025

  46. [54]

    Average-exact mixed anomalies and compatible phases,

    Y. Xu and C.-M. Jian, “Average-exact mixed anomalies and compatible phases,”Phys. Rev. B111 (Mar, 2025) 125128

    2025

  47. [55]

    Diagnosing Strong-to-Weak Symmetry Breaking via Wightman Correlators,

    Z. Liu, L. Chen, Y. Zhang, S. Zhou, and P. Zhang, “Diagnosing Strong-to-Weak Symmetry Breaking via Wightman Correlators,”arXiv:2410.09327 [quant-ph]

    arXiv

  48. [56]

    Strong-to-weak spontaneous breaking of 1-form symmetry and intrinsically mixed topological order,

    C. Zhang, Y. Xu, J.-H. Zhang, C. Xu, Z. Bi, and Z.-X. Luo, “Strong-to-weak spontaneous breaking of 1-form symmetry and intrinsically mixed topological order,” Phys. Rev. B111(Mar, 2025) 115137

    2025

  49. [57]

    Strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking and average symmetry protected topological order in the doubled hilbert space,

    Y. Kuno, T. Orito, and I. Ichinose, “Strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking and average symmetry protected topological order in the doubled hilbert space,”Phys. Rev. B111(May, 2025) 174110

    2025

  50. [58]

    Strange correlation function for average symmetry-protected topological phases,

    J.-H. Zhang, Y. Qi, and Z. Bi, “Strange correlation function for average symmetry-protected topological phases,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.17485(2022)

    2022

  51. [59]

    Anomalous matrix product operator symmetries and 1D mixed-state phases,

    X.-Q. Sun, “Anomalous matrix product operator symmetries and 1D mixed-state phases,” arXiv:2504.16985 [quant-ph]

  52. [60]

    Mixed-state TQFTs,

    M. S. Zini and Z. Wang, “Mixed-state TQFTs,” arXiv:2110.13946 [math.QA]

    arXiv

  53. [61]

    Toward a Classification of Mixed-State Topological Orders in Two Dimensions,

    T. D. Ellison and M. Cheng, “Toward a Classification of Mixed-State Topological Orders in Two Dimensions,”PRX Quantum6no. 1, (2025) 010315, arXiv:2405.02390 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2025 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Noisy approach to intrinsically mixed-state topological order,

    R. Sohal and A. Prem, “Noisy approach to intrinsically mixed-state topological order,”PRX Quantum6(Jan, 2025) 010313

    2025

  55. [63]

    Stability and loop models from decohering non-abelian topological order,

    P. Sala and R. Verresen, “Stability and loop models from decohering non-abelian topological order,”Phys. Rev. Lett.134(Jun, 2025) 250403

    2025

  56. [64]

    Decoherence and wave-function deformation ofD 4 non-abelian topological order,

    P. Sala, J. Alicea, and R. Verresen, “Decoherence and wave-function deformation ofD 4 non-abelian topological order,”Phys. Rev. X15(Jul, 2025) 031002

    2025

  57. [65]

    Majorana chain and ising model-(non-invertible) translations, anomalies, and emanant symmetries,

    N. Seiberg and S.-H. Shao, “Majorana chain and ising model-(non-invertible) translations, anomalies, and emanant symmetries,”SciPost Physics16no. 3, (2024) 064

    2024

  58. [66]

    The witt group of non-degenerate braided fusion categories,

    A. Davydov, M. M¨ uger, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, “The witt group of non-degenerate braided fusion categories,”Journal f¨ ur die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal)2013no. 677, (2013) 135–177

    2013

  59. [67]

    Anyon condensation and tensor categories,

    L. Kong, “Anyon condensation and tensor categories,” Nucl. Phys. B886(2014) 436–482,arXiv:1307.8244 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2014 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Etingof, S

    P. Etingof, S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, Tensor categories, vol. 205 ofMathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1090/surv/205

    2015 doi

  61. [69]

    Hamiltonian and algebraic theories of gapped boundaries in topological phases of matter,

    I. Cong, M. Cheng, and Z. Wang, “Hamiltonian and algebraic theories of gapped boundaries in topological phases of matter,”Communications in Mathematical Physics355(2017) 645–689

    2017

  62. [70]

    Symmetry as a shadow of topological order and a derivation of topological holographic principle,

    A. Chatterjee and X.-G. Wen, “Symmetry as a shadow of topological order and a derivation of topological holographic principle,”Phys. Rev. B107(Apr, 2023) 155136

    2023

  63. [71]

    Topological Holography: Towards a Unification of Landau and Beyond-Landau Physics,

    H. Moradi, S. F. Moosavian, and A. Tiwari, “Topological Holography: Towards a Unification of Landau and Beyond-Landau Physics,” arXiv:2207.10712 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv

  64. [72]

    Noninvertible symmetry-protected topological order in a group-based cluster state,

    C. Fechisin, N. Tantivasadakarn, and V. V. Albert, “Noninvertible symmetry-protected topological order in a group-based cluster state,”Phys. Rev. X15(Mar,

  65. [73]

    Topological Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions,

    C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, S.-H. Shao, Y. Wang, and X. Yin, “Topological Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions,” JHEP01(2019) 026,arXiv:1802.04445 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Interacting anyons in topological quantum liquids: The golden chain,

    A. Feiguin, S. Trebst, A. W. W. Ludwig, M. Troyer, A. Kitaev, Z. Wang, and M. H. Freedman, “Interacting anyons in topological quantum liquids: The golden chain,”Phys. Rev. Lett.98(2007) 160409, arXiv:cond-mat/0612341

    2007 arXiv

  67. [75]

    A short introduction to Fibonacci anyon models,

    S. Trebst, M. Troyer, Z. Wang, and A. W. W. Ludwig, “A short introduction to Fibonacci anyon models,” arXiv e-prints(Feb., 2009) arXiv:0902.3275, arXiv:0902.3275 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2009 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Topological Defects on the Lattice I: The Ising model,

    D. Aasen, R. S. K. Mong, and P. Fendley, “Topological Defects on the Lattice I: The Ising model,”J. Phys. A 49no. 35, (2016) 354001,arXiv:1601.07185 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2016 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Anyonic Chains, Topological Defects, and Conformal Field Theory,

    M. Buican and A. Gromov, “Anyonic Chains, Topological Defects, and Conformal Field Theory,” Commun. Math. Phys.356no. 3, (2017) 1017–1056, arXiv:1701.02800 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Dualities in One-Dimensional Quantum Lattice Models: Symmetric Hamiltonians and Matrix Product Operator Intertwiners,

    L. Lootens, C. Delcamp, G. Ortiz, and F. Verstraete, “Dualities in One-Dimensional Quantum Lattice Models: Symmetric Hamiltonians and Matrix Product Operator Intertwiners,”PRX Quantum4no. 2, (2023) 020357,arXiv:2112.09091 [quant-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  71. [79]

    On lattice models of gapped phases with fusion category symmetries,

    K. Inamura, “On lattice models of gapped phases with fusion category symmetries,”JHEP03(2022) 036, arXiv:2110.12882 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2022 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Spin chains, defects, and quantum wires for the quantum-double edge,

    V. V. Albert, D. Aasen, W. Xu, W. Ji, J. Alicea, and J. Preskill, “Spin chains, defects, and quantum wires for the quantum-double edge,”arXiv:2111.12096 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv

  73. [81]

    Non-Abelian hybrid fracton orders,

    N. Tantivasadakarn, W. Ji, and S. Vijay, “Non-Abelian hybrid fracton orders,”Phys. Rev. B104no. 11, (2021) 115117,arXiv:2106.03842 [cond-mat.str-el]. 48

    2021 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Higher categorical symmetries and gauging in two-dimensional spin systems,

    C. Delcamp and A. Tiwari, “Higher categorical symmetries and gauging in two-dimensional spin systems,”SciPost Phys.16no. 4, (2024) 110, arXiv:2301.01259 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Generalized Charges, Part II: Non-Invertible Symmetries and the Symmetry TFT,

    L. Bhardwaj and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Generalized Charges, Part II: Non-Invertible Symmetries and the Symmetry TFT,”arXiv:2305.17159 [hep-th]

  76. [84]

    Tensor categories with fusion rules of self-duality for finite abelian groups,

    D. Tambara and S. Yamagami, “Tensor categories with fusion rules of self-duality for finite abelian groups,”Journal of Algebra209no. 2, (1998) 692–707

    1998

  77. [85]

    SymTFTs, Anyon Condensation, and Twin Algebras (to appear)

    Y. Gai, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Warman. “SymTFTs, Anyon Condensation, and Twin Algebras (to appear)” (2025)

    2025

  78. [86]

    Cluster state as a noninvertible symmetry-protected topological phase,

    S. Seifnashri and S.-H. Shao, “Cluster state as a noninvertible symmetry-protected topological phase,” Phys. Rev. Lett.133(Sep, 2024) 116601

    2024

  79. [87]

    Random transverse field ising spin chains,

    D. S. Fisher, “Random transverse field ising spin chains,”Phys. Rev. Lett.69(Jul, 1992) 534–537

    1992

  80. [88]

    Critical behavior of random transverse-field ising spin chains,

    D. S. Fisher, “Critical behavior of random transverse-field ising spin chains,”Phys. Rev. B51 (Mar, 1995) 6411–6461

    1995

  81. [89]

    Centers of graded fusion categories,

    S. Gelaki, D. Naidu, and D. Nikshych, “Centers of graded fusion categories,”arXiv:0905.3117 [math.QA]

    arXiv

  82. [90]

    Symmetry TFTs for Non-Invertible Defects,

    J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, and Y. Zheng, “Symmetry TFTs for Non-Invertible Defects,”arXiv:2209.11062 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  83. [91]

    Anomalies of non-invertible self-duality symmetries: fractionalization and gauging,

    A. Antinucci, F. Benini, C. Copetti, G. Galati, and G. Rizi, “Anomalies of non-invertible self-duality symmetries: fractionalization and gauging,” arXiv:2308.11707 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  84. [92]

    Noninvertible Symmetry-Enriched Quantum Critical Point,

    L. Li, R.-Z. Huang, and W. Cao, “Noninvertible Symmetry-Enriched Quantum Critical Point,” arXiv:2411.19034 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv

  85. [93]

    On lagrangian algebras in group-theoretical braided fusion categories,

    A. Davydov and D. Simmons, “On lagrangian algebras in group-theoretical braided fusion categories,” Journal of Algebra471(2017) 149–175

    2017

  86. [94]

    Computing modular data for pointed fusion categories,

    A. Gruen and S. Morrison, “Computing modular data for pointed fusion categories,”Indiana University Mathematics Journal70no. 2, (2021) 561–593, arXiv:1808.05060 [math.QA]

    2021 arXiv

  87. [95]

    GAP – Groups, Algorithms, and Programming, Version 4.14.0,

    “GAP – Groups, Algorithms, and Programming, Version 4.14.0,” 2024.https://www.gap-system.org

    2024

  88. [96]

    SymTFT for (3+1)d Gapless SPTs and Obstructions to Confinement,

    A. Antinucci, C. Copetti, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “SymTFT for (3+1)d Gapless SPTs and Obstructions to Confinement,”arXiv:2408.05585 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  89. [97]

    Topological order at nonzero temperature,

    M. B. Hastings, “Topological order at nonzero temperature,”Phys. Rev. Lett.107(Nov, 2011) 210501

    2011

  90. [98]

    Mixed-state topological order and the errorfield double formulation of decoherence-induced transitions,

    Y. Bao, R. Fan, A. Vishwanath, and E. Altman, “Mixed-state topological order and the errorfield double formulation of decoherence-induced transitions,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.05687(2023)

    2023 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Diagnostics of mixed-state topological order and breakdown of quantum memory,

    R. Fan, Y. Bao, E. Altman, and A. Vishwanath, “Diagnostics of mixed-state topological order and breakdown of quantum memory,”PRX Quantum5 (May, 2024) 020343

    2024

  92. [100]

    Separability transitions in topological states induced by local decoherence,

    Y.-H. Chen and T. Grover, “Separability transitions in topological states induced by local decoherence,”Phys. Rev. Lett.132(Apr, 2024) 170602

    2024

  93. [101]

    Stability of mixed-state quantum phases via finite markov length,

    S. Sang and T. H. Hsieh, “Stability of mixed-state quantum phases via finite markov length,”Phys. Rev. Lett.134(Feb, 2025) 070403

    2025

  94. [102]

    Noninvertible duality defects in 3+1 dimensions,

    Y. Choi, C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, “Noninvertible duality defects in 3+1 dimensions,”Phys. Rev. D105no. 12, (2022) 125016, arXiv:2111.01139 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Kramers-Wannier-like Duality Defects in (3+1)D Gauge Theories,

    J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, and Y. Zheng, “Kramers-Wannier-like Duality Defects in (3+1)D Gauge Theories,”Phys. Rev. Lett.128no. 11, (2022) 111601,arXiv:2111.01141 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Non-Invertible Higher-Categorical Symmetries,

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Tiwari, “Non-Invertible Higher-Categorical Symmetries,”SciPost Phys.14(2023) 007, arXiv:2204.06564 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Obstructions to Gapped Phases from Non-Invertible Symmetries,

    A. Apte, C. Cordova, and H. T. Lam, “Obstructions to Gapped Phases from Non-Invertible Symmetries,” arXiv:2212.14605 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  98. [106]

    The holography of non-invertible self-duality symmetries,

    A. Antinucci, F. Benini, C. Copetti, G. Galati, and G. Rizi, “The holography of non-invertible self-duality symmetries,”arXiv:2210.09146 [hep-th]

  99. [107]

    Anomalies of Non-Invertible Symmetries in (3+1)d,

    C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, and C. Zhang, “Anomalies of Non-Invertible Symmetries in (3+1)d,” arXiv:2308.11706 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  100. [108]

    Fiber 2-Functors and Tambara-Yamagami Fusion 2-Categories,

    T. D. D´ ecoppet and M. Yu, “Fiber 2-Functors and Tambara-Yamagami Fusion 2-Categories,” arXiv:2306.08117 [math.CT]

    arXiv

  101. [109]

    Fusion 3-Categories for Duality Defects,

    L. Bhardwaj, T. D´ ecoppet, S. Schafer-Nameki, and M. Yu, “Fusion 3-Categories for Duality Defects,” arXiv:2408.13302 [math.CT]

    arXiv

  102. [110]

    Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,

    J. M. Maldacena, “Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,”JHEP04(2003) 021,arXiv:hep-th/0106112

    2003 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Fermionic Non-Invertible Symmetries in (1+1)d: Gapped and Gapless Phases, Transitions, and Symmetry TFTs,

    L. Bhardwaj, K. Inamura, and A. Tiwari, “Fermionic Non-Invertible Symmetries in (1+1)d: Gapped and Gapless Phases, Transitions, and Symmetry TFTs,” arXiv:2405.09754 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  104. [112]

    Fermionic quantum criticality through the lens of topological holography,

    S.-J. Huang, “Fermionic quantum criticality through the lens of topological holography,”arXiv:2405.09611 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv

  105. [113]

    Quantum criticality under decoherence or weak measurement,

    J. Y. Lee, C.-M. Jian, and C. Xu, “Quantum criticality under decoherence or weak measurement,”PRX Quantum4(Aug, 2023) 030317

    2023

  106. [114]

    Mixed-state long-range order and criticality from measurement and feedback,

    T.-C. Lu, Z. Zhang, S. Vijay, and T. H. Hsieh, “Mixed-state long-range order and criticality from measurement and feedback,”PRX Quantum4(Aug,

  107. [115]

    Unconventional topological mixed-state transition and critical phase induced by self-dual coherent errors,

    Y.-H. Chen and T. Grover, “Unconventional topological mixed-state transition and critical phase induced by self-dual coherent errors,”Phys. Rev. B 110(Sep, 2024) 125152

    2024

  108. [116]

    Measurement-altered ising quantum criticality,

    S. Murciano, P. Sala, Y. Liu, R. S. Mong, and J. Alicea, “Measurement-altered ising quantum criticality,”Physical Review X13no. 4, (2023) 041042. 49

    2023

  109. [117]

    Topological Holography for Mixed-State Phases and Phase Transitions

    R. Luo, Y.-N. Wang, and Z. Bi. “Topological Holography for Mixed-State Phases and Phase Transitions” (2025)

    2025

  110. [118]

    The Symmetry Taco: Equivalences between Gapped, Gapless, and Mixed-State SPTs

    M. Qi, R. Sohal, X. Chen, D. T. Stephen, and A. Prem. “The Symmetry Taco: Equivalences between Gapped, Gapless, and Mixed-State SPTs” (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.