Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 51 references

Harmonic emission as a probe to coherent transitions in the topological superconductors

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In a dimerized Kitaev chain, a laser pulse turns the sharp harmonic peaks of the intrinsic supercurrent into broad plateaus and makes band populations oscillate in a Rabi-like manner that the authors attribute to Majorana bound…

desk verdict The static-emission and pairing controls are worth a look, but the MBS-Rabi claim needs a real Rabi analysis and a proper stationary ground state. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.06215 v1 pith:WAFOGSKA submitted 2025-07-08 cond-mat.other cond-mat.supr-conquant-ph

Nivash R. , S. Srinidhi , Jayendra N. Bandyopadhyay , Amol R. Holkundkar This is my paper
classification cond-mat.othercond-mat.supr-conquant-ph
keywords topologicalsuperconductorKitaevchainMajoranaboundstateshigh-harmonicgenerationRabioscillationsbandpopulationdynamicsintrinsicsupercurrentdimerization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that a dimerized Kitaev chain—a one-dimensional model of a p-wave topological superconductor—emits harmonic radiation without any external field when its ground state includes degenerate mid-gap states, and that this static emission comes from the intrinsic supercurrent of the chain. Adding a mid-infrared laser drive enriches the emission into broad plateau-like structures and makes the band populations oscillate in a coherent, Rabi-like fashion. The authors attribute those oscillations to Majorana bound states and take the combination of harmonic spectra and population dynamics as evidence that laser driving can probe the topological and dynamical stability of the system. If true, high-harmonic spectroscopy would give a non-local, all-optical way to detect and interrogate Majorana coherence in engineered superconducting wires.

What carries the argument

The central object is the dimerized Kitaev chain Hamiltonian with staggered hopping w(1∓λ) and real p-wave pairing Δ, whose eigenstates are classified into a valence band (VB), three conduction bands (CB-I–CB-III), and two kinds of degenerate intermediate states: mid-gap states (MGS, split into pMGS and nMGS at ±E) and zero-energy Majorana bound states (MBS). The argument runs on two computed observables: the harmonic emission spectrum obtained from the total current operator J(t) after time-evolving the initial state with an implicit finite-difference propagator, and the instantaneous band populations Pm(t) = ⟨ψ(t)|φm⟩⟨φm|ψ(t)⟩ obtained by projecting onto the field-free eigenbasis. The conjunction of these two observables—plateau formation in the spectrum and oscillation in the populations—carries the claim that laser driving exposes coherent transitions anchored by Majorana bound states.

What would settle it

Project out the Majorana mid-gap states from the initial state (or suppress the pairing below the topological threshold) and recompute the population oscillations: if the same oscillation frequency and line shape persist without Majorana bound states, the Rabi-via-MBS attribution is falsified. Equivalently, drive with a tunable continuous-wave laser and plot the population-oscillation frequency versus detuning: a genuine Rabi process gives a V-shaped frequency sqrt(Ω²+δ²) with a minimum at zero detuning, whereas a quantum beat keeps a fixed frequency set by the energy splitting.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Starting from the conventional ground state |ψGS⟩ = VB + nMGS of the dimerized Kitaev chain, the static (undriven) system shows sharp harmonic peaks whose positions match transitions such as nMGS↔MBS, VB↔pMGS, and VB↔CB-III, which the paper reads as a signature of the intrinsic supercurrent. Switching on a Gaussian laser pulse enhances the emission into plateau-like regions (e.g., ~12.8–16 eV at λ=0.05) by activating multiple resonant transitions, and the field-driven band populations exhibit coherent oscillations. The paper's central claim is that these Rabi-like oscillations are mediated by Majorana bound states and thereby confirm the quasiparticle nature of the model, establishing laser-driven harmonic emission as a probe of the system's topological and dynamical stability.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the observed oscillatory band populations are Rabi oscillations mediated by Majorana bound states, rather than generic quantum beats arising from the free evolution of the deliberately prepared initial superposition |ψGS⟩ = VB + nMGS.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Static harmonic emission from the dimerized Kitaev chain occurs only when the initial state includes degenerate mid-gap states (VB+nMGS); a VB-only initial state produces no static emission, and a four-band insulator without pairing produces no static current, so the emission marks both pairing and ground-state degeneracy.
  • Under the chosen Gaussian drive, the static peaks merge into plateaus in specific energy windows that shift with the dimerization parameter λ, meaning the harmonic cutoff positions encode the band gaps and edge-state energy differences.
  • Coherent oscillations appear in the populations of the conduction bands and intermediate states; if they are Rabi oscillations tied to Majorana bound states, the oscillation frequency and envelope could be read out from the population traces as a measure of MBS coherence.
  • The persistence of particle-hole symmetric quasiparticle transitions (e.g., VB to its chiral partner CB-III) under driving suggests that the topological protection survives the strong field, so harmonic emission can serve as a stability probe.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves the Rabi attribution qualitative: the same oscillatory signal would arise from quantum beats between the eigenstates composing the deliberately prepared superposition |ψGS⟩ = VB + nMGS, so a two-level fit with Rabi frequency versus detuning is needed to uniquely assign the oscillations to Majorana bound states.
  • The plateau-enhancement result is more robust than the MBS-Rabi interpretation: even if the oscillation attribution fails, the static-versus-driven comparison of harmonic spectra remains a workable probe of pairing-induced supercurrent and of the band-edge structure.
  • The supplementary comparison with a topologically equivalent four-band insulator suggests a general rule testable in other models: undriven emission appears only when both superconducting pairing and an initial occupation of degenerate (mid-gap or edge) states are present, so HHG could diagnose both ingredients in engineered chains.
  • A concrete extension would be frequency-resolved population dynamics: driving with a continuous-wave field and mapping the population-oscillation frequency as a function of detuning would produce a characteristic avoided crossing for genuine Rabi oscillations, while quantum beats would show a detuning-independent frequency.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies a dimerized Kitaev chain with real p-wave pairing, coupled to a Gaussian laser pulse via the Peierls substitution. Using Crank-Nicolson time propagation, it computes total-current high-harmonic spectra and time-dependent band populations for initial states built from valence-band and midgap states. The authors report static harmonic emission that they attribute to an intrinsic supercurrent, laser-induced plateau structures, and 'Rabi-like oscillations' in band populations attributed to Majorana bound states. The SI provides a four-band topological-insulator control, a pairing-strength sweep, and population dynamics for alternative initial states.

Significance. If established, the central claim would make high-harmonic generation a probe of MBS coherence in topological superconductors, which is a goal of current interest. The numerical method is standard, and the SI contains genuinely useful control calculations: the pairing-strength sweep shows that static emission vanishes for very small Δ, and the four-band TI control shows no static emission without pairing. However, the flagship new result—MBS-mediated Rabi oscillations—is not supported by any quantitative analysis, and the static-emission interpretation is undermined by the non-stationarity of the chosen initial state. The paper would be publishable after substantial additional analysis, but in its present form the abstract overclaims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Population dynamics (Figs. 2-3) and Fig. 1] Fig. 2 is labeled 'undriven GS' yet shows band populations changing with time for A0=0. This demonstrates that |ψGS⟩=VB+nMGS is not an eigenstate of H0 but a coherent superposition whose free evolution already produces oscillations at the BdG energy differences. The 'Rabi-like oscillations' reported in Fig. 3 and the abstract are therefore not automatically attributable to MBS; the undriven curves in Fig. 2 are the needed baseline, and a quantitative comparison (or subtraction) is missing. Relatedly, the black 'static' emission curves in Fig. 1 are generated by time-evolving this non-stationary state, so the claim of an intrinsic supercurrent should be checked against the true BdG ground state (all negative-energy eigenstates occupied); the SI Fig. 8 result that the VB-only initial state gives no emission is consistent with the alternative explanation that the static emission is simply dephasing of the prepared superposition.
  2. [Fig. 3 and abstract] No quantitative Rabi test is presented. The manuscript neither fits the population oscillations to a sin²(Ωt/2) law, nor varies the laser amplitude or detuning to show that the oscillation frequency follows the expected Rabi scaling, nor compares with a two-level model derived from the BdG spectrum. The SI four-band TI control addresses only the static/emission part and does not test population dynamics; moreover, it removes pairing but also changes the model structure, so it does not isolate MBS from the pMGS/nMGS midgap states. I request either a parameter scan with a quantitative Rabi analysis or removal of the MBS-Rabi attribution from the abstract and conclusion.
  3. [Fig. 1 and Table I] The assignment of harmonic peaks to specific band-to-band or midgap transitions relies on colored vertical lines placed on the spectra by inspection. Since the central probe claim is that harmonic energies encode the BdG level differences, the authors should report a quantitative comparison, such as a table of predicted transition energies from the eigenspectrum versus observed peak positions for each λ. This would also help distinguish genuine resonances from features caused by the non-stationary initial state.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eqs. (1)-(4)] Define the many-body notation |ψGS⟩=VB+nMGS precisely; clarify whether it is a Slater determinant of occupied BdG eigenstates or a coherent superposition of many-body states.
  2. [Eq. (2) and laser parameters] The laser parameters (A0=0.1 a.u., 7.2 μm, FWHM 1.25τ) should specify the pulse envelope and the relationship between τ and the optical cycle; also state the unit convention for the vector potential in the Peierls phase exp(-iaA(t)).
  3. [Captions of Figs. 2 and 3] The captions contain 'expect' for 'except'; additionally, the y-axes use per-state scaling factors (×10^-1, ×10^-2) while the text quotes both total and per-band populations, so please clarify which quantity is plotted.
  4. [References] Reference [12] appears to be a duplicate of reference [11].
  5. [Abstract and conclusion] The phrase 'static configuration undergoes a transition' is vague; specify that what is observed is time-dependent population transfer under A0=0.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The advertised MBS-mediated Rabi oscillations are not derived: the populations already oscillate in the undriven case because the initial state VB+nMGS is a coherent superposition, so the MBS attribution relabels generic quantum beats.

  1. renaming known result [Abstract; Eq. (4) and Figs. 2–3 (population dynamics)]
    "Under laser driving, we observe an enhancement in static emission forming a plateau-like structure, accompanied by multiple coherent transitions in the population. These transitions exhibit Rabi-like oscillations, attributed to the presence of Majorana bound states (MBS), further reinforcing the quasiparticle character of the model."

    With the definition Pm(t)=⟨ψ(t)|Πm|ψ(t)⟩ and the prepared initial state |ψGS⟩=VB+nMGS, which is a coherent sum of BdG eigenstates, oscillatory populations at Bohr frequencies follow from free Schrödinger evolution even at A0=0. The paper's own Fig. 2, labeled 'undriven GS,' shows exactly these zero-field oscillations. Hence the 'Rabi-like oscillations' are guaranteed by the initial condition by construction; no laser or MBS-mediated mechanism is needed to produce them. No Rabi-frequency-versus-detuning scan, sin² envelope test, or MBS-free control is supplied, so calling them MBS-driven is a relabeling of generic quantum beats rather than a prediction derived from a Majorana-specific term.

full rationale

The harmonic-generation part of the paper is self-contained: the plateau features are consistency-checked against the band structure, no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and the SI comparison to a non-superconducting four-band model independently supports the role of pairing in static emission. The self-citation to the authors' earlier paper [43] for the model analysis and for naming the zero-energy states MBS/MGS is not load-bearing, since the dimerized Kitaev chain and its Majorana zero modes are standard textbook material. The only reduction-by-construction issue is the abstract's central identification of the population oscillations as MBS-mediated Rabi oscillations: because the 'GS' is chosen as VB+nMGS, a deliberately non-eigenstate superposition, the undriven evolution already produces the oscillatory populations displayed in Fig. 2. The laser-driven curves in Fig. 3 are therefore not independent evidence for a Majorana Rabi mechanism unless a quantitative Rabi test is supplied; in the present text the attribution is an interpretation of the same coherent dynamics rather than a distinct predicted quantity. This warrants a partial circularity flag, but not a high score, because the main HHG observables and their band-structure assignments are not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The results rest entirely on the standard Kitaev chain model and numerical propagation. The main modeling freedom is the choice of the initial VB+nMGS superposition and the parameter values; no derived or fitted constants are used to force the observed spectra or populations. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Chemical potential µ = 0.225 a.u.
    Chosen to place the dimerized Kitaev chain in a topological regime; not fitted to the target result.
  • Hopping amplitude w = 0.25 a.u.
    Sets the energy scale; chosen by hand.
  • Pairing potential ∆ = 0.2375 a.u.
    Chosen to produce mid-gap states; the SI shows emission vanishes for ∆ ≲ 0.01, so the value is selected to make the effect visible.
  • Laser amplitude A0 = 0.1 a.u.
    Chosen for the strong-field regime; no intensity scan is reported.
  • Dimerization parameter λ = 0.05, 0.4, 0.8
    Scanned to show different band configurations; not fitted.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Kitaev chain tight-binding model with real p-wave pairing ∆
    The starting Hamiltonian (Eq. 1/6) is the standard spinless p-wave superconducting chain of Kitaev.
  • domain assumption Peierls substitution w → w e^(-iaA(t)) for laser coupling
    Used to couple the vector potential to the tight-binding model; standard but not derived.
  • ad hoc to paper Initial state |ψGS⟩ = VB + nMGS is the conventional ground state
    The paper chooses this superposition as the ground state; it is not the true ground state of the Hamiltonian, and the dynamics depend on this choice.
  • domain assumption Zero-energy states in the finite chain are Majorana bound states
    The classification of intermediate states as MBS/MGS follows from the Kitaev chain topology and prior literature; assumed without direct verification in this paper.
  • domain assumption Crank-Nicholson propagation converges with the chosen time step
    No convergence tests are reported; the method is standard but the accuracy is unverified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Harmonic emission as a probe to coherent transitions in the topological superconductors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WAFOGSKA

@misc{pith2026250706215,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Harmonic emission as a probe to coherent transitions in the topological superconductors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WAFOGSKA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.06215}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the dynamical behavior of a topological superconducting system, demonstrating that its static configuration undergoes a transition driven by an intrinsic supercurrent. By analyzing the band population, we confirm the quasiparticle nature of the system both in the presence and absence of an external laser field. Under laser driving, we observe an enhancement in static emission forming a plateau-like structure, accompanied by multiple coherent transitions in the population. These transitions exhibit Rabi-like oscillations, attributed to the presence of Majorana bound states (MBS), further reinforcing the quasiparticle character of the model. Our results highlight the efficacy of laser driving as a probe of the system's topological and dynamical stability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.06215 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Figure depicts the results of the harmonic emission when the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The figure depicts the band population of the DKC model for undriven GS. The first column in red denotes the filled GS for different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The figure depicts the band population of the DKC model under strong-field with the amplitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The figure depicts the properties of a TI model, in the ab [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The figure depicts the lattice structure compared in this Sup [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The figure depicts the emission spectra for the static DKC model. The system parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The figure reveals the eigen spectrum and emission pro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The figure reveals the emission profile for GS to be summed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The figure displays the band poulation for the static GS to be [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. The figure displays the band poulation for the static GS to be [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Takasan, S

    K. Takasan, S. Sumita, and Y . Yanase, Supercurrent-induced topological phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B106, 014508 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Minutillo, P

    M. Minutillo, P. Lucignano, G. Campagnano, and A. Russo- manno, Kitaev ring threaded by a magnetic flux: Topological gap, anderson localization of quasiparticles, and divergence of supercurrent derivative, Phys. Rev. B109, 064504 (2024)

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    G. R. S. and, Unconventional superconduc- tivity, Advances in Physics 66, 75 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1080/00018732.2017.1331615

    arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    A. Y . Kitaev, Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires, Physics-Uspekhi 44, 131 (2001)

    2001

  5. [5]

    del Pozo and K

    F. del Pozo and K. Le Hur, Topological signatures of a p-wave superconducting wire through light, Phys. Rev. B110, L060503 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Corkum, P

    F. Corkum, P. B.and Krausz, Attosecond science, Nature Physics 3, 381 (2007)

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    Krausz and M

    F. Krausz and M. Ivanov, Attosecond physics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 163 (2009)

    2009

  8. [8]

    Ghimire, A

    S. Ghimire, A. D. DiChiara, E. Sistrunk, P. Agostini, L. F. Di- Mauro, and D. A. Reis, Observation of high-order harmonic generation in a bulk crystal, Nature Physics 7, 138 (2011)

    work page 2011

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Ghimire and D

    S. Ghimire and D. A. Reis, High-harmonic generation from solids, Nature Physics 15, 10 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    Vampa, C

    G. Vampa, C. R. McDonald, G. Orlando, D. D. Klug, P. B. Corkum, and T. Brabec, Theoretical analysis of high-harmonic generation in solids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 073901 (2014)

    2014

  3. [12]

    T. T. Luu and H. J. Wörner, Measurement of the berry curvature of solids using high-harmonic spectroscopy, Nature Communi- cations 9, 916 (2018)

    2018

  4. [13]

    M. Guan, S. Hu, H. Zhao, C. Lian, and S. Meng, Toward at- tosecond control of electron dynamics in two-dimensional ma- terials, Applied Physics Letters 116, 043101 (2020)

    2020

  5. [14]

    Y . Bai, F. Fei, S. Wang, N. Li, X. Li, F. Song, R. Li, Z. Xu, and P. Liu, High-harmonic generation from topological surface states, Nature Physics 17, 311 (2021)

    2021

  6. [15]

    M. R. Bionta, E. Haddad, A. Leblanc, V . Gruson, P. Lassonde, H. Ibrahim, J. Chaillou, N. Émond, M. R. Otto, A. Jiménez- Galán, R. E. F. Silva, M. Ivanov, B. J. Siwick, M. Chaker, and F. m. c. Légaré, Tracking ultrafast solid-state dynamics using high harmonic spectroscopy, Ph...

    2021

  7. [16]

    Neufeld, N

    O. Neufeld, N. Tancogne-Dejean, H. Hübener, U. De Giovan- nini, and A. Rubio, Are there universal signatures of topological phases in high-harmonic generation? probably not., Phys. Rev. X 13, 031011 (2023)

    2023

  8. [17]

    N. R, J. N. Bandyopadhyay, and A. R. Holkundkar, Prob- ing topological phase transitions in the aubry-andre-harper model via high-harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. B110, 115103 (2024)

    2024

  9. [18]

    Goulielmakis, V

    E. Goulielmakis, V . S. Yakovlev, A. L. Cavalieri, M. Uiber- acker, V . Pervak, A. Apolonski, R. Kienberger, U. Kleineberg, and F. Krausz, Attosecond control and measurement: Light- wave electronics, Science 317, 769 (2007)

    2007

  10. [19]

    Klemke, N

    N. Klemke, N. Tancogne-Dejean, G. M. Rossi, Y . Yang, F. Scheiba, R. E. Mainz, G. Di Sciacca, A. Rubio, F. X. Kärtner, and O. D. Mücke, Polarization-state-resolved high- harmonic spectroscopy of solids, Nature Communications 10, 1319 (2019)

    2019

  11. [20]

    J. Li, J. Lu, A. Chew, S. Han, J. Li, Y . Wu, H. Wang, S. Ghimire, and Z. Chang, Attosecond science based on high harmonic generation from gases and solids, Nature Communications 11, 2748 (2020)

    2020

  12. [21]

    Higuchi, M

    T. Higuchi, M. I. Stockman, and P. Hommelhoff, Strong-field perspective on high-harmonic radiation from bulk solids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 213901 (2014)

    2014

  13. [22]

    Hohenleutner, F

    M. Hohenleutner, F. Langer, O. Schubert, M. Knorr, U. Huttner, S. W. Koch, M. Kira, and R. Huber, Real-time observation of in- terfering crystal electrons in high-harmonic generation, Nature 523, 572 (2015)

    2015

  14. [23]

    Chacón, D

    A. Chacón, D. Kim, W. Zhu, S. P. Kelly, A. Dauphin, E. Pisanty, A. S. Maxwell, A. Picón, M. F. Ciappina, D. E. Kim, C. Ticknor, A. Saxena, and M. Lewenstein, Circular dichro- ism in higher-order harmonic generation: Heralding topologi- cal phases and transitions in chern insul...

    2020

  15. [24]

    J. Park, A. Subramani, S. Kim, and M. F. C. and, Recent 10 trends in high-order harmonic generation in solids, Advances in Physics: X 7, 2003244 (2022)

    2022

  16. [25]

    Heide, Y

    C. Heide, Y . Kobayashi, S. R. U. Haque, and S. Ghimire, Ultra- fast high-harmonic spectroscopy of solids, Nature Physics 20, 1546 (2024)

    2024

  17. [26]

    I. I. Rabi, Space quantization in a gyrating magnetic field, Phys. Rev. 51, 652 (1937)

    1937

  18. [27]

    Y . O. Dudin, L. Li, F. Bariani, and A. Kuzmich, Observation of coherent many-body rabi oscillations, Nature Physics 8, 790 (2012)

    2012

  19. [28]

    Makhlin, G

    Y . Makhlin, G. Schön, and A. Shnirman, Quantum-state engi- neering with josephson-junction devices, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 357 (2001)

    2001

  20. [29]

    Y . Chen, S. Peng, Z. Fu, L. Qiu, G. Fan, Y . Liu, S. Wu, X. Xie, and Z. Tao, Ultrafast quantum control of atomic excited states via interferometric two-photon rabi oscillations, Communica- tions Physics 7, 98 (2024)

    2024

  21. [30]

    Wang, Q.-F

    Z. Wang, Q.-F. Liang, D.-X. Yao, and X. Hu, Viewing ma- jorana bound states by rabi oscillations, Scientific Reports 5, 10.1038/srep11686 (2015)

    2015 doi

  22. [31]

    H. Pan, S. Das Sarma, and C.-X. Liu, Rabi and ramsey oscil- lations of a majorana qubit in a quantum dot-superconductor array, Phys. Rev. B111, 075416 (2025)

    2025

  23. [32]

    Zhang, K

    Y . Zhang, K. Jiang, F. Zhang, J. Wang, and Z. Wang, Atomic line defects and topological superconductivity in unconven- tional superconductors, Phys. Rev. X 11, 011041 (2021)

    2021

  24. [33]

    Sigrist and K

    M. Sigrist and K. Ueda, Phenomenological theory of unconven- tional superconductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys.63, 239 (1991)

    1991

  25. [34]

    Wang, J.-J

    Y . Wang, J.-J. Miao, H.-K. Jin, and S. Chen, Characterization of topological phases of dimerized kitaev chain via edge corre- lation functions, Phys. Rev. B 96, 205428 (2017)

    2017

  26. [35]

    K. Roy, S. Roy, and S. Basu, Quasiperiodic disorder induced critical phases in a periodically driven dimerized p-wave kitaev chain, Scientific Reports 14, 20603 (2024)

    2024

  27. [36]

    S. Roy, S. N. Nabi, and S. Basu, Critical and topological phases of dimerized kitaev chain in presence of quasiperiodic potential, Phys. Rev. B 107, 014202 (2023)

    2023

  28. [37]

    X. Liu, X. Zhu, P. Lan, X. Zhang, D. Wang, Q. Zhang, and P. Lu, Time-dependent population imaging for high-order- harmonic generation in solids, Phys. Rev. A95, 063419 (2017)

    2017

  29. [38]

    Ernotte, T

    G. Ernotte, T. J. Hammond, and M. Taucer, A gauge-invariant formulation of interband and intraband currents in solids, Phys. Rev. B 98, 235202 (2018)

    2018

  30. [39]

    N. R, A. R. Holkundkar, and J. N. Bandyopadhyay, Tempo- ral control of high-order harmonic cutoffs in periodic crystals, Phys. Rev. A 108, 063503 (2023)

    2023

  31. [40]

    A. R. Holkundkar, N. R, and J. N. Bandyopadhyay, Role of interband and intraband current in laser interaction with bichro- matic quasiperiodic crystals, Phys. Rev. B 109, 155155 (2024)

    2024

  32. [41]

    A. A. Zvyagin, Dynamics of the kitaev chain model under para- metric pumping, Phys. Rev. B 90, 014507 (2014)

    2014

  33. [42]

    Vijay, C

    R. Vijay, C. Macklin, D. H. Slichter, S. J. Weber, K. W. Murch, R. Naik, A. N. Korotkov, and I. Siddiqi, Stabilizing rabi os- cillations in a superconducting qubit using quantum feedback, Nature 490, 77–80 (2012)

    2012

  34. [43]

    N. R., S. Srinidhi, J. N. Bandyopadhyay, and A. R. Holkundkar, Engineering harmonic emission through spatial modulation in a kitaev chain (2025), arXiv:2506.05003 [cond-mat.other]

    2025 arXiv

  35. [44]

    Baldelli, U

    N. Baldelli, U. Bhattacharya, D. González-Cuadra, M. Lewen- stein, and T. Graß, Detecting majorana zero modes via strong field dynamics, ACS Omega 7, 47424 (2022)

    2022

  36. [45]

    Pattanayak, S

    A. Pattanayak, S. Pujari, and G. Dixit, Role of majorana fermions in high-harmonic generation from kitaev chain, Sci- entific Reports 12, 6722 (2022)

    2022

  37. [46]

    Bauer and K

    D. Bauer and K. K. Hansen, High-harmonic generation in solids with and without topological edge states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 177401 (2018)

    2018

  38. [47]

    Jürß and D

    C. Jürß and D. Bauer, High-harmonic generation in su- schrieffer-heeger chains, Phys. Rev. B99, 195428 (2019)

    2019

  39. [48]

    Liu and X.-B

    J.-Q. Liu and X.-B. Bian, Detection of edge states by high-order harmonic generation in the harper model, Phys. Rev. B 105, 054308 (2022)

    2022

  40. [49]

    Dziurawiec, J

    M. Dziurawiec, J. O. de Almeida, M. L. Bera, M. Płodzie ´n, M. M. Ma ´ska, M. Lewenstein, T. Grass, and U. Bhattacharya, Unraveling multifractality and mobility edges in quasiperiodic aubry-andré-harper chains through high-harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. B 110, 014209 (2024)

    2024

  41. [50]

    Yu, High-order harmonic generation from su-schrieffer- heeger chains with edge states: Three-step processes and their interference, Phys

    C. Yu, High-order harmonic generation from su-schrieffer- heeger chains with edge states: Three-step processes and their interference, Phys. Rev. A 110, 033113 (2024)

    2024

  42. [51]

    Jia, X.-H

    G.-R. Jia, X.-H. Huang, and X.-B. Bian, Nonadiabatic redshifts in high-order harmonic generation from solids, Opt. Express25, 23654 (2017)

    2017

  43. [52]

    Du and X.-B

    T.-Y . Du and X.-B. Bian, Quasi-classical analysis of the dy- namics of the high-order harmonic generation from solids, Opt. Express 25, 151 (2017)

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.