Landau theory for lattice higher gauge theory and Kramers-Wannier duality

Kiyoharu Kawana

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Landau theory for lattice higher gauge theory and Kramers-Wannier duality

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that lattice higher gauge theory on p-dimensional cells is exactly equivalent to a functional Landau field theory whose classical solutions reproduce the area and perimeter laws and whose Kramers-Wannier duality becomes…

desk verdict The exact Hubbard-Stratonovich rewriting is clean and general, but the weak-coupling deconfined phase and the claimed perimeter law rest on an uncomputed sign flip that, for the explicit weight, fails on large surfaces. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.06555 v1 pith:6LOYB6QU submitted 2025-07-09 hep-th hep-latmath-phmath.MP

Kiyoharu Kawana This is my paper

classification hep-thhep-latmath-phmath.MP

keywords higher-formsymmetrylatticegaugetheoryLandaufieldHubbard-StratonovichtransformationKramers-WannierdualityarealawtopologicaldefectsWilsonsurfaceoperator

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that a lattice higher gauge theory, defined on p-dimensional cells, can be rewritten exactly as a Landau field theory in which the Wilson-surface operator becomes a fundamental functional field charged under the p-form global symmetry. The payoff is a single mean-field framework that reproduces the expected area law in the strong-coupling confined phase and the perimeter law in the weak-coupling deconfined phase, constructs topological defects analogous to vortices and domain walls, and gives a higher-form generalization of the Coleman-Mermin-Wagner theorem. The same construction turns Kramers-Wannier duality of the lattice gauge theory into an infrared duality between continuum Landau theories, relating closed objects of different dimensionalities that share the same higher-form symmetry. If correct, this gives a Landau-Ginzburg-style description of generalized symmetries and of strings and branes.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation driven by the plaquette-shift operator $\hat{H}$ (18), which converts the Wilson action into a quadratic form and introduces a functional field $\phi[C_p]$ on the space of closed p-dimensional surfaces. The kinetic term then involves the area derivative $\delta/\delta\sigma_{\mu_1\cdots\mu_{p+1}}$ (43), whose continuum limit supplies the d'Alembert operator in (56). The same operator structure makes the p-form global symmetry manifest, and the Fourier-transform and gauging steps in Section 5.1 yield the Kramers-Wannier duality that is the paper's bridge to an infrared duality between Landau theories.

What would settle it

Compute $|\omega[C_p]|^2$ for the weight functional (20) on a finite lattice; if $T_p^2 - (1/g^2)|\omega[C_p]|^2$ remains positive for all $g$, the broken phase, the perimeter law, and the infrared duality do not follow. Alternatively, a lattice Monte Carlo measurement of the Wilson-surface expectation value at small $g$ can directly test whether the perimeter law holds.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central discovery is that the lattice higher gauge theory (7) is exactly equivalent to a functional scalar theory (26) on the space of self-avoiding closed p-dimensional surfaces, obtained by a Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation. In the classical continuum limit this becomes a Landau action (56) whose kinetic term is a d'Alembert operator built from area derivatives. Solving the functional equation of motion gives a classical solution that decays as $\exp(-T_p \,\mathrm{Vol}[M_{p+1}])$ in the strong-coupling limit, the area law, and in the weak-coupling limit a broken phase whose order parameter follows the perimeter law and whose low-energy fluctuations are described by p-form Maxwell theory for $\mathrm{U}(1)$ or by a BF-type topological field theory for finite abelian groups. The paper further constructs topological defects as higher-dimensional analogs of vortices and domain walls, uses them to argue the Coleman-Mermin-Wagner theorem for higher-form symmetries, and derives the Kramers-Wannier duality (159), which induces the infrared duality (173) between Landau field theories.

Load-bearing premise

The argument relies on the assertion that the quadratic coefficient $T_p^2 - (1/g^2)|\omega[C_p]|^2$ in Eq. (82) becomes negative for sufficiently small $g$, but $|\omega[C_p]|^2$ is never computed, so the sign flip is not demonstrated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Confinement and deconfinement of p-form gauge theories can be diagnosed by a single mean-field Landau functional: strong coupling produces the area law (81), while weak coupling produces a broken phase with perimeter law.
For compact U(1) higher-form symmetry, topological defects render the would-be Goldstone mode massive and prevent spontaneous symmetry breaking for $p \geq D-2$; finite abelian p-form symmetry cannot be spontaneously broken for $p \geq D-1$.
Kramers-Wannier duality (159) implies an infrared duality (173) between the Landau theory of p-dimensional closed objects and the gauged Landau theory of $(D-p-2)$-dimensional closed objects, so closed objects of different dimensions can belong to the same universality class when they share the same higher-form symmetry.
In $D=3$, $p=1$, the duality makes the confinement/deconfinement transition of $\mathbb{Z}_N$ lattice gauge theory a particle-like, 0-form transition rather than a string-like one.
The constructed topological defects are higher-form analogs of global vortices and domain walls, with explicit field profiles determined by the dimensionless equations (113) and (125).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the central claim holds, a direct numerical test of the sign flip in Eq. (82) is available: evaluating $|\omega[C_p]|^2$ on finite lattices would determine whether the predicted broken phase actually occurs.
If the infrared duality (173) holds, the critical exponents of $\mathbb{Z}_N$ p-form gauge theories should match those of gauged $(D-p-2)$-form scalar theories, a prediction that could be checked by Monte Carlo or tensor-network studies.
The construction may extend to non-abelian groups or higher-group symmetries, but the Hubbard-Stratonovich potential (27) would no longer be quadratic in a simple character expansion, so that extension is not automatic.
Because the Wilson-surface operator is promoted to a fundamental field, the world-volume tension $T_p$ appears as a mass parameter; tuning it across the sign-flip point would describe a brane-condensation transition, a phase structure the paper leaves implicit.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper's exact Hubbard-Stratonovich reformulation of lattice higher gauge theories on p-links is the real contribution. The equivalence (22) between the Wilson action and the quadratic string-field action is clean, the area-derivative kinetic term is a nice generalization of earlier p=1 work, and the construction works for arbitrary p and for both U(1) and Z_N gauge groups. That part is solid and worth a careful read.

The trouble starts in Section 4.2. The weak-coupling broken phase, and with it the perimeter law advertised in the abstract, the topological-defect analysis, and the KW phase map, all hang on Eq. (82): the quadratic coefficient T_p^2 - (1/g^2)|omega[C_p]|^2 is asserted to become negative for small g. But |omega[C_p]|^2 is never computed. With the explicit weight (20), it is b^2 e^{-alpha Vol[C]}. That means for any fixed small g, surfaces with Vol[C] larger than about (1/alpha) log(1/g^2) keep a positive quartic coefficient. Since a p-form symmetry is only nontrivial on large surfaces, the order parameter does not condense in the infinite-volume limit unless g is taken to zero after the volume limit—not the standard order of limits.

The field redefinition in Eq. (33), which absorbs e^{-alpha Vol[C]} into the Wilson-surface operator, does not fix this. It changes the charged operator: the physical Wilson surface is the unweighted one, and the rescaling moves the volume dependence into the kinetic term, where an exponential factor suppresses uniform VEVs in the original variables. So the perimeter law is not derived; it is an artifact of an implicit redefinition.

The strong-coupling area law, by contrast, is on much firmer ground: the functional equation with the minimal-surface ansatz gives an exponentially decaying solution, consistent with confinement. The lattice KW duality in Section 5.1 is standard but clearly presented, and the idea of lifting it to the Landau theories is suggestive. The paper is honest about its weak points—footnote 7 flags the single-transition assumption, and Section 3.3 admits the upper-critical-dimension estimate is naive.

The central problem is that the deconfined phase, the defect solutions, and the IR duality all inherit the unestablished weak-coupling assumption. This is a load-bearing gap, not a minor omission. The paper reads like a useful dictionary in search of a rigorous core: the HS step is exact, the questions are good, but the phase diagram needs either a computed |omega|^2, a different weight without the exponential suppression, or a clear statement that the perimeter law holds only in a double-scaling limit.

Who should read it: people working on higher-form symmetries, string field theory, and generalized Landau theories. It deserves a serious referee because the exact reformulation is worth airing, but the referee should insist on repairing the weak-coupling argument before publication.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper constructs a Landau-type field theory for lattice higher gauge theories on p-dimensional cells by performing an exact Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation that recasts the partition function as a functional integral over a complex scalar field living on the space of self-avoiding closed p-surfaces. The kinetic term becomes a second-order area-derivative operator, and the paper studies the classical continuum limit, mean-field phases, topological defects, the Coleman-Mermin-Wagner theorem for higher-form symmetries, and a Kramers-Wannier duality that is claimed to imply an infrared duality between Landau field theories. The central claim is that the classical solution of the Landau theory exhibits an area law in the strong-coupling limit and a perimeter law in the weak-coupling limit, corresponding respectively to confined and deconfined phases of the original higher gauge theory.

Significance. The paper contains a genuine and clean formal result: the exact equivalence between the lattice higher gauge theory and the functional scalar theory, displayed in Eqs. (22) and (26), is a nontrivial and useful rewriting, and the continuum kinetic term expressed through area derivatives (Eq. (56)) is a natural extension of earlier string-field-theory constructions. The construction of topological-defect solutions for U(1) and Z_N higher gauge theories, the derivation of the Coleman-Mermin-Wagner mechanism from monopole proliferation, and the formulation of a lattice KW duality that acts on the Landau side are interesting and potentially valuable. If the phase structure were fully established, the paper would provide a concrete mean-field framework for higher-form symmetry breaking and a new perspective on IR dualities between theories of extended objects. However, the significance is currently limited by gaps in the derivation of the weak-coupling broken phase and the perimeter-law statement, as detailed in the major comments.

major comments (4)

[Sec. 4.2, Eq. (82)]
[Sec. 4.1, Eqs. (73)-(81)]
[Sec. 3.1 and Sec. 4.1]
[Sec. 5.2 and Appendix D]

minor comments (3)

[Sec. 4.3, heading]
[Sec. 3.2, Eq. (56)]
[Sec. 4.2, Eq. (86)-(87)]

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Area-law prediction reduces to the input tension T_p; HS and KW-duality sectors remain independent.

self definitional [Sec. 3.3 (Eq. 65) and Sec. 4.1 (Eqs. 72, 80-81)]
"In the next section, we will see that T_p := sqrt(|mu|) corresponds to a world-volume tension of p-brane. ... f''(z) - T_p^2 f(z) ≈ 0 ... f(z) ≈ c × e^{-T_p Vol[M_{p+1}]}."

T_p is introduced in Eq. (57) as an arbitrary input parameter of the continuum action, T_p^2 ∝ a^{-2(p+1)}/(k0+1) for an arbitrary regulator constant k0, with no relation to the lattice inverse coupling β derived from the original gauge theory. The strong-coupling equation of motion (80) is then simply the free massive equation f'' = T_p^2 f, whose solution (81) has decay exponent T_p. Calling this a derivation of the area law is therefore equivalent to saying that the input mass parameter, already named 'bare p-brane tension', reappears as the output area-law exponent. The functional form is the solution of the equation one wrote down, and the tension is not predicted from the lattice gauge theory; it is an input renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The exact Hubbard-Stratonovich rewriting (25)-(26) is a genuine identity, and the KW-duality derivation (159) follows from the standard Fourier/gauging manipulation of the lattice action; neither reduces to its own conclusion. The main circular step is confined to the mean-field 'prediction' of the area law: T_p is introduced by hand in Eq. (57) and then recovered as the decay exponent in Eq. (81), so this particular prediction is the input parameter renamed. The weak-coupling broken-phase argument in Eq. (82) is a robustness gap rather than a circularity: the coefficient |omega[C_p]|^2 is never evaluated, and with the explicit weight (20) it is volume-suppressed, so the claimed sign flip is not established; this is a correctness risk, not an equation identical to its conclusion. The author's prior works [19,26,27,36] are cited for area-derivative and mean-field technology, but the present paper defines those operations explicitly and does not rely on an unexamined self-citation chain for its exact equivalences. Overall, the exact dualities and the Landau-theory construction keep independent content, while one mean-field phase prediction is tautological.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The exact HS rewriting contributes no new physical degrees of freedom, so the free-parameter and axiom burden sits in the choices needed to make the continuum limit and phase analysis work: the weight functional, the bare tension, the undetermined potential coefficients, the minimal-surface ansatz, and the asserted sign flip of the quadratic term. The paper is transparent about some of these (e.g., the single-transition assumption and the naive Hausdorff-dimension argument), but the weak-coupling phase and the IR duality rest on uncomputed inputs.

free parameters (7)

alpha (brane tension in weight functional w) = not specified; mass dimension p
Introduced in Eq. (20) to make the sum over closed surfaces well-defined; drops out of physical observables by the HS construction but is an input choice.
T_p (bare p-brane tension) = proportional to a^{-(p+1)}/(k_0+1)^{1/2}
Appears in the quadratic potential (57) and controls the exponential area-law decay in Eq. (81); it is an input mass scale, not predicted.
N (path-integral normalization) = set by N c_0(0) = 1
In Appendix B the normalization is chosen so the phase-fluctuation effective action reproduces the p-form Maxwell term with coefficient v^2/(2 beta); this is a tuning choice.
c (constant in area-law solution) = undetermined
In Eq. (81), c is 'determined by a boundary condition at Vol[C_p]=0 in principle' but never fixed; the area-law exponent is T_p, the constant is free.
|omega[C_p]|^2 (quadratic potential coefficient) = not computed
Eq. (82) assumes (T_p^2 - |omega|^2/g^2) becomes negative at small g; |omega|^2 is never evaluated, so the weak-coupling broken phase rests on this unverified coefficient.
xi (monopole fugacity) = arbitrary
Introduced in Eq. (134) in the monopole-gas derivation of the Coleman-Mermin-Wagner theorem; no value or prediction is given.
lambda (defect self-coupling) = 1 (in numerics)
Chosen for numerical defect profiles in Eqs. (114) and (126); no physical value is derived.

assumptions (7)

domain assumption Restriction to self-avoiding closed surfaces Gamma_p (Sec 2)
The functional field phi is defined only on self-avoiding surfaces; intersecting-surface configurations are excluded from the HS construction.
domain assumption Volume-suppression weight makes the surface sum convergent (Eq. 20)
The normalization (21) approximates the sum by an integral over Vol[C_p]; convergence of the weighted surface sum is assumed.
domain assumption Continuum limit replaces the surface sum by a path integral over embeddings (Eq. 52)
The measure a^D sum_{C_p} -> N integral DX is assumed; this is a heuristic step with no proof of convergence or measure regularization.
ad hoc to paper General form of the potential expansion (30) and the sign flip of the quadratic term (82)
The weak-coupling broken phase and the phase diagram depend on the uncomputed coefficient |omega|^2; the paper asserts the quadratic term becomes negative for small g without deriving |omega|^2.
ad hoc to paper Ansatz phi = f(Vol[M_{p+1}])/sqrt(2) in the strong-coupling equation of motion (Eq. 73)
The area-law solution is obtained only for surfaces that are boundaries of minimal surfaces; the general-surface equation of motion is not solved.
domain assumption Single phase transition as a function of coupling (footnote 7)
The phase diagram in Fig. 10 assumes one transition; the paper notes numerical studies support a Coulomb phase for N>=5, so the assumption is nontrivial.
ad hoc to paper Hausdorff dimension D_H = 2(p+1) of random surfaces (Sec 3.3)
The upper critical dimension D_c = 4(p+1) follows from a random-walk/central-limit argument (68)-(69); the paper concedes this is too naive and that non-local interactions may alter it.

invented entities (1)

Functional order-parameter field phi[C_p]
purpose: Collective field in the Landau description of higher gauge theory
Introduced by the Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation as a bookkeeping variable; it is a reformulation of the original gauge degrees of freedom and makes no falsifiable prediction outside the framework.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Landau theory for lattice higher gauge theory and Kramers-Wannier duality." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6LOYB6QU

@misc{pith2026250706555,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Landau theory for lattice higher gauge theory and Kramers-Wannier duality},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6LOYB6QU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.06555}
}

abstract

We derive a Landau field theory for a lattice higher gauge theory defined on $p$-dimensional open cells (i.e., sites, links, faces, cubes, etc.), and study its continuum-limit and phases. In this approach, the $p$-dimensional Wilson-surface operator of the higher gauge theory is promoted to a fundamental functional field that is charged under the $p$-form global symmetry. By explicitly solving the functional equation of motion, we show that the classical solution exhibits the area~(perimeter) law in the strong (weak) gauge coupling limit. In the deconfined phase, we also construct topological defects for both $\mathrm{U}(1)$ and $\mathbb{Z}_N^{}$ higher gauge theories, as analogs of vortex and domain-wall solutions in conventional field theories with $0$-form global symmetries. Besides, we examine low-energy effective theory by identifying the phase modulations of the functional field as low-energy modes, and discuss the Coleman-Mermin-Wagner theorem for higher-form global symmetries. Finally, we discuss infrared duality among Landau field theories, which originates from Kramers-Wannier duality in lattice higher gauge theories.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.06555 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Left: p-plaquettes and p-links. Here we show p = 1 and p = 2 cases. Right: Examples of closed 2-dimensional surfaces. The left (right) one is a self-avoiding (intersecting) surface. lar, a p-link extending in the p-dimensional subspace (Xµ1 , · · · , Xµp ) is explicitly denoted by Lµ1 ···µp (ˆi), where ˆi represents the center-of-mass position of it. We focus on self-avoiding p-dimensional closed surfaces Cp with or… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Graphical representation of the operator relation (13). Here, the red point [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (7 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Combination of a 2-dimensional surface C2 and 2-plaquette P2 . In the upper case, a single 2-link (face) is erased and the remaining five 2-links are attached to C2 . In the lower case, on the other hand, five 2-links are erased and the remaining one 2-link is attached…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: A topological defect in the compact U(1) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Field profiles of the topological defect for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Left: Topologically nontrivial static configuration in Z [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Field profile of the topological defect for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Winding of the dual scalar field φ along a loop C1 that links Cp . between Cp and C1 is illustrated in a D = (p+2)-dimensional space. Since the classical field φ satisfies d ⋆ dφ − ξ sin(φ) ⋆ 1 = 0 on ΣDnCp , this winding is localized on the intersecting point between …

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: The Kramers-Wannier duality in finite higher gauge theories. The pink (blue) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_10.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Revisiting wormhole-induced global symmetry breaking
hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

Ensemble averaging over wormhole α-parameters is dominated by the symmetric point α=0 for spontaneously broken U(1) p-form symmetries, so standard PQ models evade the wormhole-induced axion quality problem.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Gaiotto, A

D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett,Generalized Global Symmetries, JHEP02(2015), 172,1412.5148

arXiv 2015
[2]

Kapustin,Wilson-’t Hooft operators in four-dimensional gauge theories and S- duality, Phys

A. Kapustin,Wilson-’t Hooft operators in four-dimensional gauge theories and S- duality, Phys. Rev. D74(2006), 025005,hep-th/0501015

arXiv 2006
[3]

Pantev and E

T. Pantev and E. Sharpe,GLSM’s for Gerbes (and other toric stacks), Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.10(2006), no. 1, 77–121,hep-th/0502053

arXiv 2006
[4]

Nussinov and G

Z. Nussinov and G. Ortiz,A symmetry principle for topological quantum order, Annals Phys.324(2009), 977–1057,cond-mat/0702377

arXiv 2009
[5]

Banks and N

T. Banks and N. Seiberg,Symmetries and Strings in Field Theory and Gravity, Phys. Rev. D83(2011), 084019,1011.5120

arXiv 2011
[6]

Kapustin and R

A. Kapustin and R. Thorngren,Higher symmetry and gapped phases of gauge theories, (2013),1309.4721

arXiv 2013
[7]

Aharony, N

O. Aharony, N. Seiberg, and Y. Tachikawa,Reading between the lines of four- dimensional gauge theories, JHEP08(2013), 115,1305.0318

arXiv 2013
[8]

Kapustin and N

A. Kapustin and N. Seiberg,Coupling a QFT to a TQFT and Duality, JHEP04 (2014), 001,1401.0740

arXiv 2014

Show all 51 references

[9]

Gaiotto, A

D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, Z. Komargodski, and N. Seiberg,Theta, Time Reversal, and Temperature, JHEP05(2017), 091,1703.00501

2017 arXiv
[10]

McGreevy,Generalized Symmetries in Condensed Matter, Ann

J. McGreevy,Generalized Symmetries in Condensed Matter, Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys.14(2023), 57–82,2204.03045

2023 arXiv
[11]

T. D. Brennan and S. Hong,Introduction to Generalized Global Symmetries in QFT and Particle Physics, (2023),2306.00912

2023 arXiv
[12]

Bhardwaj, L

L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, L. Fraser-Taliente, L. Gladden, D. S. W. Gould, A. Platschorre, and H. Tillim,Lectures on generalized symmetries, Phys. Rept.1051 (2024), 1–87,2307.07547

2024 arXiv
[13]

Luo, Q.-R

R. Luo, Q.-R. Wang, and Y.-N. Wang,Lecture Notes on Generalized Symmetries and Applications, (2023),2307.09215

2023 arXiv
[14]

P. R. S. Gomes,An introduction to higher-form symmetries, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 74(2023), 1,2303.01817

2023 arXiv
[15]

Shao,What’s Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Sym- metries, (2023),2308.00747

S.-H. Shao,What’s Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Sym- metries, (2023),2308.00747. 45

2023 arXiv
[16]

Hayashi and Y

Y. Hayashi and Y. Tanizaki,Unifying Monopole and Center Vortex as the Semi- classical Confinement Mechanism, Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024), no. 17, 171902, 2405.12402

2024 arXiv
[17]

Hidaka, M

Y. Hidaka, M. Nitta, and R. Yokokura,Selection rules of topological solitons from non-invertible symmetries in axion electrodynamics, (2024),2411.05434

2024 arXiv
[18]

Yoneya,A Path Functional Field Theory of Lattice Gauge Models and the LargeN Limit, Nucl

T. Yoneya,A Path Functional Field Theory of Lattice Gauge Models and the LargeN Limit, Nucl. Phys. B183(1981), 471–496

1981
[19]

Kawana,Classical Continuum Limit of the String Field Theory Dual to Lattice Gauge Theory, PTEP2025(2025), no

K. Kawana,Classical Continuum Limit of the String Field Theory Dual to Lattice Gauge Theory, PTEP2025(2025), no. 3, 033B07,2410.08552

2025 arXiv
[20]

A. A. Migdal,Loop Equations and 1/N Expansion, Phys. Rept.102(1983), 199–290

1983
[21]

Makeenko and A

Y. Makeenko and A. A. Migdal,Quantum Chromodynamics as Dynamics of Loops, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.32(1980), 431

1980
[22]

A. M. Polyakov,Gauge Fields as Rings of Glue, Nucl. Phys. B164(1980), 171–188

1980
[23]

Kawai,A Dual Transformation of the Nielsen-olesen Model, Prog

H. Kawai,A Dual Transformation of the Nielsen-olesen Model, Prog. Theor. Phys.65 (1981), 351

1981
[24]

Rey,The Higgs Mechanism for Kalb-ramond Gauge Field, Phys

S.-J. Rey,The Higgs Mechanism for Kalb-ramond Gauge Field, Phys. Rev. D40 (1989), 3396

1989
[25]

Iqbal and J

N. Iqbal and J. McGreevy,Mean string field theory: Landau-Ginzburg theory for 1- form symmetries, SciPost Phys.13(2022), 114,2106.12610

2022 arXiv
[26]

Hidaka and K

Y. Hidaka and K. Kawana,Effective brane field theory with higher-form symmetry, JHEP01(2024), 016,2310.07993

2024 arXiv
[27]

Kawana,Field Theory for Superconducting Branes and Generalized Particle-Vortex Duality, (2024),2406.03670

K. Kawana,Field Theory for Superconducting Branes and Generalized Particle-Vortex Duality, (2024),2406.03670

2024 arXiv
[28]

Lake,Higher-form symmetries and spontaneous symmetry breaking, (2018), 1802.07747

E. Lake,Higher-form symmetries and spontaneous symmetry breaking, (2018), 1802.07747

2018 arXiv
[29]

H. A. Kramers and G. H. Wannier,Statistics of the two-dimensional ferromagnet. part i, Phys. Rev.60(1941), 252–262

1941
[30]

H. A. Kramers and G. H. Wannier,Statistics of the Two-Dimensional Ferromagnet. Part II, Phys. Rev.60(1941), 263–276

1941
[31]

Itzykson and J

C. Itzykson and J. M. Drouffe,STATISTICAL FIELD THEORY. VOL. 1: FROM BROWNIAN MOTION TO RENORMALIZATION AND LATTICE GAUGE THE- ORY, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, CUP, 1989. 46

1989
[32]

Kaidi, K

J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, and Y. Zheng,Kramers-Wannier-like Duality Defects in (3+1)D Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022), no. 11, 111601,2111.01141

2022 arXiv
[33]

Koide, Y

M. Koide, Y. Nagoya, and S. Yamaguchi,Non-invertible topological defects in 4- dimensionalZ 2 pure lattice gauge theory, PTEP2022(2022), no. 1, 013B03, 2109.05992

2022 arXiv
[34]

Banks,THE GAUSSIAN TRANSFORMATION CONVERTS LATTICE GAUGE THEORY INTO A FIELD THEORY OF STRINGS, Phys

T. Banks,THE GAUSSIAN TRANSFORMATION CONVERTS LATTICE GAUGE THEORY INTO A FIELD THEORY OF STRINGS, Phys. Lett. B89(1980), 369– 372

1980
[35]

Nambu,Generalized Hamiltonian dynamics, Phys

Y. Nambu,Generalized Hamiltonian dynamics, Phys. Rev. D7(1973), 2405–2412

1973
[36]

Kawana,Phases and propagation of closed p-brane, (2025),2503.14902

K. Kawana,Phases and propagation of closed p-brane, (2025),2503.14902

2025 arXiv
[37]

Parisi,Hausdorff Dimensions and Gauge Theories, Phys

G. Parisi,Hausdorff Dimensions and Gauge Theories, Phys. Lett. B81(1979), 357– 360

1979
[38]

Distler, Z

J. Distler, Z. Hlousek, and H. Kawai,Hausdorff Dimension of Continuous Polyakov’s Random Surfaces or Who’ Afraid of Joseph Liouville? Part 2, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 5(1990), 1093

1990
[39]

Kawai,Quantum gravity and random surfaces, Nucl

H. Kawai,Quantum gravity and random surfaces, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.26 (1992), 93–110

1992
[40]

Kawai, N

H. Kawai, N. Kawamoto, T. Mogami, and Y. Watabiki,Transfer matrix formalism for two-dimensional quantum gravity and fractal structures of space-time, Phys. Lett. B306(1993), 19–26,hep-th/9302133

1993 arXiv
[41]

Ambjorn, D

J. Ambjorn, D. Boulatov, J. L. Nielsen, J. Rolf, and Y. Watabiki,The Spectral di- mension of 2-D quantum gravity, JHEP02(1998), 010,hep-th/9801099

1998 arXiv
[42]

Ambjørn and T

J. Ambjørn and T. Budd,The toroidal Hausdorff dimension of 2d Euclidean quantum gravity, Phys. Lett. B724(2013), 328–332,1305.3674

2013 arXiv
[43]

Villain, J.,A magnetic analogue of stereoisomerism : application to helimagnetism in two dimensions, J. Phys. France38(1977), no. 4, 385–391

1977
[44]

A. M. Polyakov,Compact Gauge Fields and the Infrared Catastrophe, Phys. Lett. B 59(1975), 82–84

1975
[45]

A. M. Polyakov,Quark Confinement and Topology of Gauge Groups, Nucl. Phys. B 120(1977), 429–458

1977
[46]

Panero,A Numerical study of confinement in compact QED, JHEP05(2005), 066, hep-lat/0503024

M. Panero,A Numerical study of confinement in compact QED, JHEP05(2005), 066, hep-lat/0503024. 47

2005 arXiv
[47]

Itzykson and J.-M

C. Itzykson and J.-M. Drouffe,Statistical field theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press, 1989

1989
[48]

Nguyen, T

M. Nguyen, T. Sulejmanpasic, and M. ¨Unsal,Phases of Theories with ZN 1-Form Symmetry, and the Roles of Center Vortices and Magnetic Monopoles, Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025), no. 14, 141902,2401.04800

2025 arXiv
[49]

M. E. Peskin,Mandelstam ’t Hooft Duality in Abelian Lattice Models, Annals Phys. 113(1978), 122

1978
[50]

Karch and D

A. Karch and D. Tong,Particle-Vortex Duality from 3d Bosonization, Phys. Rev. X 6(2016), no. 3, 031043,1606.01893

2016 arXiv
[51]

Hasenbusch,Direct Monte Carlo measurement of the surface tension in Ising mod- els, J

M. Hasenbusch,Direct Monte Carlo measurement of the surface tension in Ising mod- els, J. Phys. I(France)3(1993), no. 3, 753–765,hep-lat/9209016. 48

1993 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Gaiotto, A

D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett,Generalized Global Symmetries, JHEP02(2015), 172,1412.5148

arXiv 2015

[2] [2]

Kapustin,Wilson-’t Hooft operators in four-dimensional gauge theories and S- duality, Phys

A. Kapustin,Wilson-’t Hooft operators in four-dimensional gauge theories and S- duality, Phys. Rev. D74(2006), 025005,hep-th/0501015

arXiv 2006

[3] [3]

Pantev and E

T. Pantev and E. Sharpe,GLSM’s for Gerbes (and other toric stacks), Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.10(2006), no. 1, 77–121,hep-th/0502053

arXiv 2006

[4] [4]

Nussinov and G

Z. Nussinov and G. Ortiz,A symmetry principle for topological quantum order, Annals Phys.324(2009), 977–1057,cond-mat/0702377

arXiv 2009

[5] [5]

Banks and N

T. Banks and N. Seiberg,Symmetries and Strings in Field Theory and Gravity, Phys. Rev. D83(2011), 084019,1011.5120

arXiv 2011

[6] [6]

Kapustin and R

A. Kapustin and R. Thorngren,Higher symmetry and gapped phases of gauge theories, (2013),1309.4721

arXiv 2013

[7] [7]

Aharony, N

O. Aharony, N. Seiberg, and Y. Tachikawa,Reading between the lines of four- dimensional gauge theories, JHEP08(2013), 115,1305.0318

arXiv 2013

[8] [8]

Kapustin and N

A. Kapustin and N. Seiberg,Coupling a QFT to a TQFT and Duality, JHEP04 (2014), 001,1401.0740

arXiv 2014