Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Minimal Multi-Majoron Model

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proposes the first realistic multi-Majoron model in which two hierarchical vacuum values set the two right-handed neutrino masses and a combined gravitational-wave spectrum can determine both mass scales.

desk verdict Clever mechanism for hierarchical RHN masses, but the U(1)_N charges in Table 1 forbid the Majorana couplings and the potential term in Eq. (3.9) violates the same symmetry — as printed the model doesn't have the symmetry it invokes. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.08645 v1 pith:UXIYXN7J submitted 2025-07-11 hep-ph astro-ph.CO

Bowen Fu , Anish Ghoshal , Stephen F. King This is my paper
classification hep-phastro-ph.CO
keywords multi-Majoronmodelright-handedneutrinomasshierarchytypeIseesawflavonglobalU(1)symmetrycosmicstringswallsboundedbygravitationalwavesfromphasetransitions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's central claim is that a realistic ultraviolet-complete model of hierarchical right-handed neutrinos can be built from two complex scalar Majoron fields whose vacuum hierarchy is dictated by a global symmetry. In this minimal multi-Majoron model, a global $U(1)_N$ charge assignment makes each of the two right-handed neutrinos couple only to its own scalar field, so the two vacuum expectation values directly set the two right-handed neutrino masses. A flavon field and two vectorlike fermions generate the effective Yukawa couplings needed for the type I seesaw, which reproduces the measured neutrino masses and mixing angles. The same vacuum values are claimed to leave a distinctive gravitational-wave footprint: a global cosmic-string signal from the larger VEV combined with a strongly first-order phase transition from the smaller VEV, whose joint spectrum can fix both right-handed neutrino mass scales. If correct, gravitational-wave observatories would provide an empirical handle on the high-scale seesaw parameters.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the $U(1)_N$ charge assignment of Table 1, applied to two complex scalar Majoron fields, i.e. scalars whose phase degrees of freedom are the Majoron Goldstone bosons: the right-handed neutrinos $N^c_1$ and $N^c_2$ carry opposite charges, and the Majoron fields $\phi_1,\phi_2$ carry charges $-2,+2$, so each neutrino is restricted to its own personal Majoron. That symmetry, in turn, is what converts a hierarchy of vacuum expectation values $\langle\phi_1\rangle \ll \langle\phi_2\rangle$ into a right-handed neutrino mass hierarchy $M_{N_1} \ll M_{N_2}$ without fine-tuning. The gravitational-wave argument is carried by two further mechanisms: after $\phi_2$ gets its vacuum value, the quartic mixing $\xi|\phi_1|^2|\phi_2|^2$ induces an effective cubic term in the $\phi_1$ potential that enhances the first-order phase transition; and the sequential symmetry breaking $U(1)\to\mathbb{Z}_4\to 1$ forms global cosmic strings that later become walls bounded by strings, whose interactions are argued to raise the loop formation rate and ultimately quadruple the string gravitational-wave power. The combination of the phase-transition peak and the string plateau is what makes the spectrum encode both mass scales.

What would settle it

A direct group-theory check would verify the potential's generality: substituting the Table 1 charges into $\kappa\,\phi_1^*\phi_2\theta^2$ gives $U(1)_N$ charge $+6$, not zero, so if that term is truly disallowed the benchmark first-order phase transition must be recomputed. Separately, a lattice simulation of the $U(1)\to\mathbb{Z}_4\to1$ string-wall network could measure whether wall-facilitated intersections actually quadruple the gravitational-wave power as assumed; a measured enhancement different from four would shift the predicted string contribution by a known factor.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper sets out to establish that the previously studied multi-Majoron idea can be made into a concrete, self-consistent particle-physics model. With two right-handed neutrinos $N^c_1,N^c_2$, two complex scalar Majoron fields $\phi_1,\phi_2$, a flavon $\theta$, and two vectorlike fermions $\chi_i$, the global symmetry $U(1)_N \times U(1)_{B-L}$ is arranged so that $N^c_i$ couples only to its personal field $\phi_i$; the direct couplings $H L N^c$ are forbidden, but the flavon and $\chi_i$ generate effective Dirac Yukawa couplings $Y^\nu_{\alpha i} \sim Y^L_{\alpha j} Y^N_{i j} \langle\theta\rangle/M_{\chi_j}$ after $\theta$ gets a vacuum value. The type I seesaw then gives light neutrino masses $m_\nu = M_D^T M_N^{-1} M_D$ with diagonal $M_N = \mathrm{diag}(y^N_1\langle\phi_1\rangle, y^N_2\langle\phi_2\rangle)$, so the hierarchy of the Majoron vacuum values is the hierarchy of the right-handed neutrino masses. On the cosmological side the paper argues that the breaking chains $U(1)_{N-(B-L)} \to \mathbb{Z}_4^I \to 1$ and $U(1)_{N+(B-L)} \to \mathbb{Z}_4^{II} \to 1$ produce global cosmic strings and walls bounded by strings, while mixing between the two scalar norm fields induces an effective cubic term that strengthens the first-order phase transition of the lighter field. The central assertion is that the combined gravitational-wave spectrum has a distinctive two-feature shape from which both right-handed neutrino mass scales can be read off.

Load-bearing premise

The benchmark gravitational-wave predictions assume that the scalar potential in Eq. (3.9), including the $\kappa\,\phi_1^*\phi_2\theta^2$ term, is the most general one allowed by the global $U(1)_N\times U(1)_{B-L}$ charges, and that string-wall interactions enhance the cosmic-string signal by a factor of four without numerical simulation; if either assumption fails, the predicted spectrum changes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the model is correct, the two right-handed neutrino masses stop being free inputs: each is fixed by a Majoron vacuum value, and both values are imprinted on the gravitational-wave spectrum.
  • The predicted spectrum has two features at different frequencies, so a multi-band network of gravitational-wave observatories could measure both the lighter and the heavier Majoron vacuum expectation values in one experiment.
  • Below the flavon scale the model reduces to the standard type I seesaw with two right-handed neutrinos, which is already known to accommodate the measured solar and atmospheric mass splittings and lepton mixing angles.
  • Benchmark point 1 puts the phase-transition peak near the decihertz band accessible to space-based interferometers, while benchmark point 2 moves it toward the higher frequencies probed by ground-based detectors.
  • The construction is explicitly extendable to three right-handed neutrinos and three Majoron fields, so the same mechanism can generate three hierarchical right-handed masses and a correspondingly richer gravitational-wave signal.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Implication the paper leaves implicit: the residual discrete symmetries $\mathbb{Z}_4^I$ and $\mathbb{Z}_4^{II}$ act as flavour symmetries with $\theta$ as the flavon, so once the soft-breaking terms are chosen the model could predict the lepton mixing pattern rather than merely accommodate it.
  • Testable extension: a lattice simulation of the $U(1)\to\mathbb{Z}_4\to1$ string-wall network should be run; the factor-of-four gravitational-wave enhancement from wall-facilitated string intersections is an analytic estimate, and numerical work is needed to confirm the scaling-regime recovery.
  • Consequence for neighbouring models: if the $\kappa\,\phi_1^*\phi_2\theta^2$ term in Eq. (3.9) is not invariant under the stated charges, the enhanced phase transition and the resulting benchmark spectra would have to be recomputed, though the general mechanism of scalar-mixing-enhanced bubble nucleation would survive in a corrected potential.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a "minimal multi-Majoron model" (MMMM) in which a global U(1)_N × U(1)_{B-L} symmetry is introduced so that two right-handed neutrinos N_i couple diagonally to their own complex scalar Majoron fields φ_i; a flavon θ and two vector-like fermions χ_i generate effective Dirac Yukawa couplings, and the VEV hierarchy ⟨φ_1⟩ ≪ ⟨φ_2⟩ produces hierarchical right-handed neutrino masses. The paper then studies neutrino masses and mixing, the symmetry-breaking chain U(1) → Z_4 → 1, hybrid string-wall networks with a heuristic factor-4 enhancement of gravitational-wave emission, and first-order phase transition spectra from two benchmark points, concluding that the combined GW spectrum determines the two right-handed neutrino mass scales.

Significance. If the construction were internally consistent, the model would be a useful explicit realization of the multi-Majoron seesaw idea, and the benchmark GW spectra would provide a concrete target for BBO/DECIGO/LISA/ET. The paper also honestly flags that the string-wall network evolution requires numerical simulation. However, the significance is currently undermined by an inconsistency in the defining charge assignments: the central Majorana Yukawa terms are forbidden by the very symmetries the model invokes, and the "most general" scalar potential is not invariant under the stated U(1)_N. Until these load-bearing issues are repaired, the model cannot be evaluated as a valid UV-complete framework.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2, Eq. (2.1) and Table 1] The Majorana Yukawa terms (y_1^N/2) φ_1 N_1^c N_1^c and (y_2^N/2) φ_2 N_2^c N_2^c are not invariant under the charges listed in Table 1. Using the table, q_N(φ_1 N_1^c N_1^c) = -2 + (-1) + (-1) = -4 and q_N(φ_2 N_2^c N_2^c) = +2 + 1 + 1 = +4; likewise q_{B-L}(φ_i N_i^c N_i^c) = 2 + 1 + 1 = 4. These terms are the entire origin of the hierarchical right-handed neutrino masses, so the defining seesaw sector is forbidden by both U(1) symmetries. The sentence in the text that "N_1^c can only couple to φ_1 and N_2^c can only couple to φ_2" is therefore not correct under the published charges: no such coupling is allowed at all. The charge table must be revised (for example q_N(φ_1)=+2, q_N(φ_2)=-2 together with q_{B-L}(φ_i)=-2), and Table 2 and the residual Z_4 charge assignments must then be re-derived.
  2. [Section 3.3, Eq. (3.9)] The potential in Eq. (3.9) is asserted to be the most general one allowed by the global U(1) symmetries, but the term κ φ_1^* φ_2 θ^2 is not invariant under U(1)_N. With the published charges its U(1)_N charge is +6; with the corrected charges required by the Majorana terms derived above it is -2. Moreover, because the Dirac seesaw terms force q_N(N_1^c) = -q_N(θ) and q_N(N_2^c) = +q_N(θ), and the Majorana terms then force q_N(φ_1)=2q_N(θ) and q_N(φ_2)=-2q_N(θ), the κ term carries charge -2q_N(θ) and can be neutral only if q_N(θ)=0, which would remove the distinguishing U(1)_N charges from all the seesaw fields. Thus the κ term cannot appear in a U(1)_N-invariant potential that simultaneously realizes the desired Yukawa structure. As written, the "most general" statement is false and the FOPT analysis based on this potential is not part of a consistent model.
  3. [Section 3.3, Eqs. (3.12)-(3.15)] The VEV notation in the FOPT derivation is internally contradictory. The text first assumes ⟨φ_1⟩ ≪ ⟨φ_2⟩, then defines v_1 = ⟨φ_2⟩ and v_2 = ⟨φ_1⟩, and finally states the "hierarchical limit v_1 ≪ v_2", which reverses the assumed ordering. The minimisation conditions in Eq. (3.12) and the cubic term in Eq. (3.15) are only consistent with v_1 = ⟨φ_1⟩ and v_2 = ⟨φ_2⟩; with the printed definitions the derivation of the φ_1 cubic term and the resulting enhancement of the first-order phase transition does not go through. The VEV labels and the expansion in Eq. (3.13) should be corrected.
  4. [Section 3.2, Eqs. (3.5)-(3.8) and factor-4 enhancement] The claimed factor-4 enhancement of the GW signal from the hybrid string-wall network is a heuristic estimate: it relies on a 50/50 branching between two winding processes, on the scaling μ ∝ n rather than the usual μ ∝ n^2 for global strings with winding number n, and on the long-string density being reduced to 1/4 without a numerical simulation. The authors explicitly state that numerical simulation is needed, which is appropriate, but the factor 4 is then used as a quantitative input for the GW spectra in Fig. 4. If the factor is applied in the plots, this should be stated in the caption and the curves should be marked as an estimate; otherwise the abstract's claim that the resulting spectrum determines the two right-handed neutrino mass scales is stronger than what is actually demonstrated by the two benchmark points.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (3.14)] The mixing angle is denoted by θ, but θ is already used for the flavon field throughout the paper; a different symbol such as ϑ would avoid confusion.
  2. [Eq. (3.13)] The expansion for φ_1 appears to be missing the v_1 term and the field δφ_1 is not defined; this makes it difficult to follow the derivation of the cubic term in Eq. (3.15).
  3. [Figure 4] The caption does not state whether the global-string contribution includes the heuristic factor-4 enhancement or which explicit formula for the global-string spectrum is used; this information is needed for reproducibility.
  4. [Section 2.1] The statement that U(1)_{B-L} "can only be a global symmetry since there are only two right-handed neutrinos" is a little terse; the anomaly-cancellation argument would be clearer if expanded by one sentence.
  5. [Abstract and Section 4] The phrase "first realistic multi-Majoron model" should be revisited after the charge assignment is corrected, since as printed the model is not yet a consistent realization of the mechanism advertised in the abstract.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the model's derivations are forward constructions; the GW 'determines masses' claim is an inverse-problem assertion, and the internal U(1)_N charge inconsistency is a correctness flaw rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's chain from charge assignments to Lagrangian to seesaw is a forward construction, not a self-referential one. The light-neutrino formula (3.4) follows from block-diagonalizing (3.3); the FOPT cubic term (3.15) is explicitly derived from the quartic xi |phi1|^2 |phi2|^2 interaction; and the total GW spectrum (3.16) is a sum of standard template spectra from [63]. The statement that the spectrum 'determines the two right-handed neutrino mass scales' is presented as a sensitivity or inverse-problem claim: the benchmark VEVs are inputs chosen to plot spectra, not outputs fitted to the spectra, so no quantity reduces to itself by construction. The import of alpha, beta/H*, and T* 'according to [32]' and the hand-set choice Max[<phi1>,<phi2>] = 2 x 10^14 GeV are borrowed or assumed inputs, but they are external inputs rather than circularly defined predictions. Similarly, the factor-of-4 cosmic-string enhancement is explicitly labeled a 'naive expectation' and deferred to numerical simulation, so it is an unvalidated modeling assumption, not a circular derivation. The more serious issue is internal inconsistency, not circularity: with the Table 1 U(1)_N charges, the Majorana Yukawa terms (y^N_1/2) phi1 N^c_1 N^c_1 and (y^N_2/2) phi2 N^c_2 N^c_2 carry U(1)_N charge -4 and +4, and the kappa phi1* phi2 theta^2 term in the 'most general' potential (3.9) carries charge +6, so the stated symmetry forbids the very couplings that define the model. This is a correctness and self-consistency defect that would invalidate the model as printed, but it is not an equivalence between a derived claim and an input, and it does not satisfy the definition of circularity used in this analysis.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 5 invented entities

The model rests on the type I seesaw, the assumption of a small flavon VEV relative to the Majoron VEVs, and the global symmetry assignments of Table 1. The quantitative GW predictions additionally rely on benchmark phase transition parameters imported from [32]. The scalar potential contains a term that violates the stated U(1)_N charge, which is a gap in the model's definition.

free parameters (6)
  • ⟨ϕ1⟩ (lighter Majoron VEV) = 1.19×10^3 GeV or 2.32×10^5 GeV in the two benchmark points
    Sets the mass of N1 (MN1 = yN1 ⟨ϕ1⟩) and controls the FOPT parameters via reference [32].
  • ⟨ϕ2⟩ (heavier Majoron VEV) = U(1)_B-L breaking scale set to 2×10^14 GeV
    Sets the mass of N2 and determines the global cosmic string tension through μ ~ η².
  • ⟨θ⟩ (flavon VEV) = not numerically specified; assumed small vs ⟨ϕi⟩ and Mχ
    Generates effective Yukawa couplings through the Dirac seesaw mechanism.
  • yN1, yN2 Majoron Yukawa couplings = unspecified
    Relate RHN masses to the Majoron VEVs; the hierarchy is assumed rather than derived.
  • Phase transition parameters α, β/H*, T*, ξw = BP1: α=0.29, β/H*=244.65, T*=5863.12 GeV; BP2: α=0.30, β/H*=204.66, T*=7.8×10^5 GeV
    Chosen from [32] to produce detectable GW signals, not computed from the model's scalar potential.
  • U(1)_B-L breaking scale for cosmic strings = 2×10^14 GeV
    Only free parameter for the global string GW signal; chosen by hand.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math The type I seesaw mechanism with two right-handed neutrinos produces the observed light neutrino mass and mixing.
    Used in Section 3.1 to derive the light neutrino mass matrix from the Dirac and Majorana mass matrices.
  • domain assumption The flavon VEV ⟨θ⟩ is small compared with ⟨ϕi⟩ and Mχ, allowing the effective Yukawa couplings of Eq. (2.2).
    Stated in Section 2.1: 'we assume the VEV of the flavon field ⟨θ⟩ is small compared with ⟨ϕi⟩ and Mχ'.
  • domain assumption U(1)_N and U(1)_B-L are global symmetries whose breaking produces the assumed scale hierarchy.
    The paper notes U(1)_B-L can only be global with two right-handed neutrinos; the symmetry breaking pattern is derived from Table 1.
  • ad hoc to paper The scalar potential in Eq. (3.9) is the most general one allowed by the symmetries.
    This claim is false for the listed charges: the κφ1*φ2θ2 term has U(1)_N charge +6 and is not invariant.
  • domain assumption The FOPT strength is enhanced by the cubic term from scalar mixing, following the paradigm of [32,62].
    Borrowed from prior literature; the benchmark phase transition parameters are not recomputed in this model.
  • ad hoc to paper The hybrid string-wall network evolution and the factor-4 GW enhancement can be estimated naively without simulation.
    Section 3.2 explicitly says the timescales 'need to be determined by numerical simulations, which is beyond the scope of this work'.
invented entities (5)
  • Global U(1)_N symmetry
    purpose: Distinguishes the two RHNs and enforces each couples only to its own Majoron field.
    No direct independent evidence; its only role is to realize the coupling structure of the model.
  • Two complex scalar Majoron fields φ1, φ2 independent evidence
    purpose: Generate hierarchical RHN masses and produce global cosmic strings and FOPT when broken.
    Their VEVs set the RHN mass scales; GW signals from cosmic strings and FOPT could be observable if the scales are as assumed.
  • Flavon θ
    purpose: Mediates effective Yukawa couplings between lepton doublets and RHNs through the Dirac seesaw.
    Necessary for the seesaw to be implemented; no direct independent signature is discussed.
  • Vector-like fermions χ1, χ2
    purpose: Enable the effective Yukawa couplings via the Dirac seesaw mechanism when integrated out.
    No collider or cosmological signature is discussed in the paper.
  • Residual Z4^I and Z4^II flavour symmetries
    purpose: Survive after U(1) breaking and are broken by ⟨θ⟩, generating domain walls bounded by strings.
    These are consequences of the charge assignments, not independently verified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Minimal Multi-Majoron Model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UXIYXN7J

@misc{pith2026250708645,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Minimal Multi-Majoron Model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UXIYXN7J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.08645}
}
abstract

In order to provide a natural framework for hierarchical right-handed neutrinos, we propose a realistic ultraviolet complete minimal multi-Majoron model (MMMM). We consider two right-handed neutrinos for simplicity, although the model is readily extendable to more. The minimal model introduces two complex scalar Majoron fields $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$, whose couplings to the two respective right-handed neutrinos are controlled by an extra global $U(1)_N$ symmetry. We show that a flavon field is required to facilitate the effective Yukawa couplings, in order to implement the type I seesaw mechanism. We analyse the resulting phenomenology related to neutrino masses, flavour mixing and cosmological predictions concerning the formation and decay of topological defects like the global cosmic strings and the domain walls when the $U(1)_N\times U(1)_{B-L}$ symmetry is broken. The resulting gravitational wave spectrum is a distinctive combination of the spectrum from the global cosmic string and strong first-order phase transitions when the symmetries are broken, the strength of the latter being enhanced by the second Majoron field. The resulting characteristic spectrum determines the two right-handed neutrino mass scales within the considered framework.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Cosmic Collider Gravitational Waves sourced by Right-handed Neutrino production from Bubbles: Testing Seesaw, Leptogenesis and Dark Matter

    astro-ph.CO 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Bubble collisions in a seesaw model produce right-handed neutrinos that source novel gravitational waves detectable by LISA, ET, and LVK while allowing the lightest RHN to explain dark matter or enable leptogenesis.

  2. High-Quality Axion Dark Matter at Gravitational Wave Interferometers

    hep-ph 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    In gauged U(1) completions enabling high-quality axion dark matter, cosmic string loops generate a stochastic gravitational wave background with an infrared break frequency that exceeds foregrounds above 10^14 GeV bre...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [32]

    Di Bari, S.F

    P. Di Bari, S.F. King and M.H. Rahat,Gravitational waves from phase transitions and cosmic strings in neutrino mass models with multiple majorons, JHEP 05 (2024) 068 [2306.04680]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Super-Kamiokande collaboration, Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett.81 (1998) 1562 [hep-ex/9807003]

    arXiv 1998

  3. [2]

    Super-Kamiokande collaboration, Solar B-8 and hep neutrino measurements from 1258 days of Super-Kamiokande data, Phys. Rev. Lett.86 (2001) 5651 [hep-ex/0103032]

    arXiv 2001

  4. [3]

    Daya Baycollaboration, Observation of electron-antineutrino disappearance at Daya Bay, Phys. Rev. Lett.108 (2012) 171803 [1203.1669]

    arXiv 2012

  5. [4]

    Minkowski,µ → eγ at a Rate of One Out of109 Muon Decays?, Phys

    P. Minkowski,µ → eγ at a Rate of One Out of109 Muon Decays?, Phys. Lett. B67 (1977) 421

    1977

  6. [5]

    Yanagida,Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos, Conf

    T. Yanagida,Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos, Conf. Proc. C7902131 (1979) 95

    1979

  7. [6]

    Gell-Mann, P

    M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond and R. Slansky,Complex Spinors and Unified Theories, Conf. Proc. C 790927 (1979) 315 [1306.4669]

    arXiv 1979

  8. [7]

    Mohapatra and G

    R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic,Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation, Phys. Rev. Lett.44 (1980) 912

    1980

Show all 76 references
  1. [8]

    Esteban, M.C

    I. Esteban, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J.a.P. Pinheiro and T. Schwetz,NuFit-6.0: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations, JHEP 12 (2024) 216 [2410.05380]

    2024 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Palanque-Delabrouille, C

    N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Yèche, N. Schöneberg, J. Lesgourgues, M. Walther, S. Chabanier et al.,Hints, neutrino bounds and WDM constraints from SDSS DR14 Lyman-α and Planck full-survey data, JCAP 04 (2020) 038 [1911.09073]

    2020 arXiv

  3. [10]

    eBOSS collaboration, Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache Point Observatory, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 083533 [2007.08991]

    2021 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Froggatt and H.B

    C.D. Froggatt and H.B. Nielsen,Hierarchy of Quark Masses, Cabibbo Angles and CP Violation, Nucl. Phys. B 147 (1979) 277

    1979

  5. [12]

    Barr,Light Fermion Mass Hierarchy and Grand Unification, Phys

    S.M. Barr,Light Fermion Mass Hierarchy and Grand Unification, Phys. Rev. D21 (1980) 1424

    1980

  6. [13]

    Barbieri, A

    R. Barbieri, A. Masiero and G. Veneziano,Hierarchy of Fermion Masses in Supersymmetric Composite Models, Phys. Lett. B128 (1983) 179

    1983

  7. [14]

    Balakrishna,Fermion Mass Hierarchy From Radiative Corrections, Phys

    B.S. Balakrishna,Fermion Mass Hierarchy From Radiative Corrections, Phys. Rev. Lett.60 (1988) 1602

    1988

  8. [15]

    Babu and X.-G

    K.S. Babu and X.-G. He,Fermion mass hierarchy and the strong CP problem, Phys. Lett. B 219 (1989) 342

    1989

  9. [16]

    Babu and T

    K.S. Babu and T. Enkhbat,Fermion mass hierarchy and electric dipole moments, Nucl. Phys. B 708 (2005) 511 [hep-ph/0406003]

    2005 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Babu,TASI Lectures on Flavor Physics, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: The Dawn of the LHC Era, pp

    K.S. Babu,TASI Lectures on Flavor Physics, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: The Dawn of the LHC Era, pp. 49–123, 2010, DOI [0910.2948]. – 15 –

    2010 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Babu and S

    K.S. Babu and S. Nandi,Natural fermion mass hierarchy and new signals for the Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D62 (2000) 033002 [hep-ph/9907213]

    2000 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Yoshioka,On fermion mass hierarchy with extra dimensions, Mod

    K. Yoshioka,On fermion mass hierarchy with extra dimensions, Mod. Phys. Lett. A15 (2000) 29 [hep-ph/9904433]

    2000 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Chao,A Three Higgs Doublet Model for Fermion Masses, Commun

    W. Chao,A Three Higgs Doublet Model for Fermion Masses, Commun. Theor. Phys.66 (2016) 340 [1201.0364]

    2016 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Altmannshofer, C

    W. Altmannshofer, C. Frugiuele and R. Harnik,Fermion Hierarchy from Sfermion Anarchy, JHEP 12 (2014) 180 [1409.2522]

    2014 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Higuchi and K

    K. Higuchi and K. Yamamoto,Aspect of Fermion Mass Hierarchy within Flavor Democracy for Yukawa Couplings, JPS Conf. Proc.1 (2014) 013011

    2014

  16. [23]

    Huitu and N

    K. Huitu and N. Koivunen,Froggatt-Nielsen mechanism in a model with SU (3)c × SU (3)L × U (1)X gauge group, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 011701 [1706.09463]

    2018 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Okada, D

    N. Okada, D. Raut and D. Villalba,Fermion Mass Hierarchy and Phenomenology in the 5D Domain Wall Standard Model, JHEP 10 (2019) 259 [1904.10308]

    2019 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Hernández, S

    A.E.C. Hernández, S. Kovalenko, M. Maniatis and I. Schmidt,Fermion mass hierarchy and g − 2 anomalies in an extended 3HDM Model, JHEP 10 (2021) 036 [2104.07047]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Bonilla, A.E

    C. Bonilla, A.E. Carcamo Hernandez, S. Kovalenko, H. Lee, R. Pasechnik and I. Schmidt, Fermion mass hierarchy in an extended left-right symmetric model, JHEP 12 (2023) 075 [2305.11967]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Fernández Navarro, S.F

    M. Fernández Navarro, S.F. King and A. Vicente,Minimal complete tri-hypercharge theories of flavour, JHEP 07 (2024) 147 [2404.12442]

    2024

  21. [28]

    Arbeláez, A.E

    C. Arbeláez, A.E. Cárcamo Hernández, C. Dib, P. Escalona Contreras, V.K. N. and A. Zerwekh,A common framework for fermion mass hierarchy, leptogenesis and dark matter, JHEP 08 (2024) 235 [2404.06577]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [29]

    S. Jana, S. Klett, M. Lindner and R.N. Mohapatra,Radiative origin of fermion mass hierarchy in left-right symmetric theory, JHEP 01 (2025) 082 [2409.04246]

    2025 arXiv

  23. [30]

    K.S. Babu, P. Di Bari, C.S. Fong and S. Saad,Leptogenesis in SO(10) with minimal Yukawa sector, JHEP 10 (2024) 190 [2409.03840]

    2024 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Bamert, C.P

    P. Bamert, C.P. Burgess and R.N. Mohapatra,Multi - Majoron modes for neutrinoless double beta decay, Nucl. Phys. B 449 (1995) 25 [hep-ph/9412365]

    1995 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Ghosh, K

    T. Ghosh, K. Loho and S. Manna,From U (1) × U (1) Symmetry Breaking to Majoron Cosmology: Insights from NANOGrav 15-year Data, pre-print. (2025) [ 2507.04342]

    2025

  26. [34]

    Kibble, G

    T.W.B. Kibble, G. Lazarides and Q. Shafi,Walls Bounded by Strings, Phys. Rev. D26 (1982) 435. – 16 –

    1982

  27. [35]

    Everett and A

    A.E. Everett and A. Vilenkin,Left-right Symmetric Theories and Vacuum Domain Walls and Strings, Nucl. Phys. B 207 (1982) 43

    1982

  28. [36]

    Lazarides, Q

    G. Lazarides, Q. Shafi and A. Tiwari,Composite topological structures in SO(10), JHEP 05 (2023) 119 [2303.15159]

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Berezinsky and J.W.F

    V. Berezinsky and J.W.F. Valle,The KeV majoron as a dark matter particle, Phys. Lett. B 318 (1993) 360 [hep-ph/9309214]

    1993 arXiv

  30. [38]

    P.-H. Gu, E. Ma and U. Sarkar,Pseudo-Majoron as Dark Matter, Phys. Lett. B690 (2010) 145 [1004.1919]

    2010 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Garcia-Cely and J

    C. Garcia-Cely and J. Heeck,Neutrino Lines from Majoron Dark Matter, JHEP 05 (2017) 102 [1701.07209]

    2017 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Ma and M

    E. Ma and M. Maniatis,Pseudo-Majoron as Light Mediator of Singlet Scalar Dark Matter, JHEP 07 (2017) 140 [1704.06675]

    2017 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Akita and M

    K. Akita and M. Niibo,Updated constraints and future prospects on majoron dark matter, JHEP 07 (2023) 132 [2304.04430]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    King, S.K

    S.F. King, S.K. Manna, R. Roshan and A. Sil,Leptogenesis with Majoron dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 095008 [2412.14121]

    2025 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Vilja,Baryogenesis in the singlet majoron model, Phys

    I. Vilja,Baryogenesis in the singlet majoron model, Phys. Lett. B324 (1994) 197 [hep-ph/9312283]

    1994 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Pilaftsis,Electroweak Resonant Leptogenesis in the Singlet Majoron Model, Phys

    A. Pilaftsis,Electroweak Resonant Leptogenesis in the Singlet Majoron Model, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 013008 [0805.1677]

    2008 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Ibe and K

    M. Ibe and K. Kaneta,Spontaneous thermal Leptogenesis via Majoron oscillation, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 035019 [1504.04125]

    2015 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Brune,Leptogenesis in Majoron models without domain walls, Phys

    T. Brune,Leptogenesis in Majoron models without domain walls, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 096023 [2201.12239]

    2023 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Wada,Majoron-driven leptogenesis in gauged U(1)Lµ-Lτ model, Phys

    J. Wada,Majoron-driven leptogenesis in gauged U(1)Lµ-Lτ model, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 103510 [2404.10283]

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Brune,Leptogenesis in a Majoron plus triplet model, Phys

    T. Brune,Leptogenesis in a Majoron plus triplet model, Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) 115001 [2501.11529]

    2025 arXiv

  41. [49]

    King,Large mixing angle MSW and atmospheric neutrinos from single right-handed neutrino dominance and U(1) family symmetry, Nucl

    S.F. King,Large mixing angle MSW and atmospheric neutrinos from single right-handed neutrino dominance and U(1) family symmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 576 (2000) 85 [hep-ph/9912492]

    2000 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Ibarra and G.G

    A. Ibarra and G.G. Ross,Neutrino phenomenology: The Case of two right-handed neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B591 (2004) 285 [hep-ph/0312138]

    2004 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Vilenkin and A.E

    A. Vilenkin and A.E. Everett,Cosmic Strings and Domain Walls in Models with Goldstone and PseudoGoldstone Bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.48 (1982) 1867

    1982

  44. [52]

    Dunsky, A

    D.I. Dunsky, A. Ghoshal, H. Murayama, Y. Sakakihara and G. White,GUTs, hybrid topological defects, and gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 075030 [2111.08750]. – 17 –

    2022 arXiv

  45. [53]

    B. Fu, A. Ghoshal, S.F. King and M.H. Rahat,Type-I two-Higgs-doublet model and gravitational waves from domain walls bounded by strings, JHEP 08 (2024) 237 [2404.16931]

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Caprini, R

    C. Caprini, R. Durrer, T. Konstandin and G. Servant,General Properties of the Gravitational Wave Spectrum from Phase Transitions, Phys. Rev. D79 (2009) 083519 [0901.1661]

    2009 arXiv

  47. [55]

    R.-G. Cai, S. Pi and M. Sasaki,Universal infrared scaling of gravitational wave background spectra, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 083528 [1909.13728]

    2020 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Brzeminski, A

    D. Brzeminski, A. Hook and G. Marques-Tavares,Precision early universe cosmology from stochastic gravitational waves, JHEP 11 (2022) 061 [2203.13842]

    2022 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Chang and Y

    C.-F. Chang and Y. Cui,Gravitational waves from global cosmic strings and cosmic archaeology, JHEP 03 (2022) 114 [2106.09746]

    2022 arXiv

  50. [58]

    B. Fu, A. Ghoshal and S.F. King,Cosmic string gravitational waves from globalU (1)B−L symmetry breaking as a probe of the type I seesaw scale, JHEP 11 (2023) 071 [2306.07334]

    2023 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Vilenkin and E.P.S

    A. Vilenkin and E.P.S. Shellard,Cosmic Strings and Other Topological Defects, Cambridge University Press (7, 2000)

    2000

  52. [60]

    Wu, K.-P

    Y. Wu, K.-P. Xie and Y.-L. Zhou,Collapsing domain walls beyond Z2, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 095013 [2204.04374]

    2022 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Wu, K.-P

    Y. Wu, K.-P. Xie and Y.-L. Zhou,Classification of Abelian domain walls, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 075019 [2205.11529]

    2022 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Kehayias and S

    J. Kehayias and S. Profumo,Semi-Analytic Calculation of the Gravitational Wave Signal From the Electroweak Phase Transition for General Quartic Scalar Effective Potentials, JCAP 03 (2010) 003 [0911.0687]

    2010 arXiv

  55. [63]

    LISA Cosmology Working Group collaboration, Gravitational waves from first-order phase transitions in LISA: reconstruction pipeline and physics interpretation, JCAP 10 (2024) 020 [2403.03723]

    2024 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Inomata, M

    K. Inomata, M. Kamionkowski, K. Kasai and B. Shakya,Gravitational Waves from Particles Produced from Bubble Collisions in First-Order Phase Transitions, 2412.17912

    arXiv

  57. [65]

    Battye and E.P.S

    R.A. Battye and E.P.S. Shellard,Global string radiation, Nucl. Phys. B 423 (1994) 260 [astro-ph/9311017]

    1994 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Chang and Y

    C.-F. Chang and Y. Cui,Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background from Global Cosmic Strings, Phys. Dark Univ.29 (2020) 100604 [1910.04781]

    2020 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Corbin and N.J

    V. Corbin and N.J. Cornish,Detecting the cosmic gravitational wave background with the big bang observer, Class. Quant. Grav.23 (2006) 2435 [gr-qc/0512039]

    2006 arXiv

  60. [68]

    DECIGO working group collaboration, Primordial gravitational wave and DECIGO, PoS KMI2019 (2019) 019

    2019

  61. [69]

    Kawamura et al.,Current status of space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO, PTEP 2021 (2021) 05A105 [2006.13545]

    S. Kawamura et al.,Current status of space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO, PTEP 2021 (2021) 05A105 [2006.13545]. – 18 –

    2021 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Caprini et al.,Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA

    C. Caprini et al.,Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions, JCAP 04 (2016) 001 [1512.06239]

    2016 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Chen, Q.-G

    Z.-C. Chen, Q.-G. Huang, C. Liu, L. Liu, X.-J. Liu, Y. Wu et al.,Prospects for Taiji to detect a gravitational-wave background from cosmic strings, JCAP 03 (2024) 022 [2310.00411]

    2024 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Sesana et al.,Unveiling the gravitational universe atµ-Hz frequencies, Exper

    A. Sesana et al.,Unveiling the gravitational universe atµ-Hz frequencies, Exper. Astron.51 (2021) 1333 [1908.11391]

    2021 arXiv

  65. [73]

    S. Hild, S. Chelkowski and A. Freise,Pushing towards the ET sensitivity using ’conventional’ technology, 0810.0604

    arXiv

  66. [74]

    Thrane and J.D

    E. Thrane and J.D. Romano,Sensitivity curves for searches for gravitational-wave backgrounds, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 124032 [1310.5300]

    2013 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Espinosa, T

    J.R. Espinosa, T. Konstandin, J.M. No and G. Servant,Energy Budget of Cosmological First-order Phase Transitions, JCAP 06 (2010) 028 [1004.4187]

    2010 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Caprini et al.,Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update, JCAP 03 (2020) 024 [1910.13125]

    C. Caprini et al.,Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update, JCAP 03 (2020) 024 [1910.13125]. – 19 –

    2020 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.