pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.14323 · v3 · submitted 2025-09-17 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO

High-Quality Axion Dark Matter at Gravitational Wave Interferometers

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 15:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.CO
keywords high-quality axionscosmic stringsstochastic gravitational wavesaxion dark matterPeccei-Quinn symmetrygravitational wave interferometersgauge symmetry breaking
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Gauged U(1) completions for high-quality axions produce a stochastic gravitational wave background from cosmic strings with a characteristic infrared break.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines ultraviolet completions of the Peccei-Quinn mechanism in which a gauged U(1) symmetry makes the axion an accidental global symmetry. Gravitational effects that would otherwise spoil the solution to the strong CP problem are suppressed, allowing the axion to account for dark matter in a viable mass window. Spontaneous breaking of the gauge symmetry creates cosmic strings whose loops radiate a stochastic gravitational wave background. For breaking scales of 10^14 GeV or higher, this background exceeds astrophysical foregrounds over a wide frequency range even under conservative assumptions. The collapse of the string-wall network imprints a distinct infrared break frequency that the authors propose as a new observable signature for these models at future gravitational wave interferometers.

Core claim

In these gauged models the spontaneous breaking of the U(1) symmetry generates a string-wall network. The stochastic gravitational wave background produced by the loops of gauge cosmic strings reaches strengths above astrophysical foregrounds for breaking scales greater than or equal to 10^14 GeV. The network collapse introduces a characteristic infrared break frequency in the spectrum that defines a frequency-amplitude region the authors call the Signature-Window-Axion-Gravitational waves (SWAG) and that can serve as a probe of high-quality axion dark matter.

What carries the argument

Gauge cosmic string loops together with the string-wall network whose collapse sets the infrared break frequency in the stochastic gravitational wave spectrum.

If this is right

  • Future space-based and ground-based interferometers can search for the stochastic gravitational wave background in the predicted frequency-amplitude region.
  • The infrared break frequency provides a distinctive feature that can distinguish these high-quality axion models from other cosmic string scenarios.
  • Even in the most conservative estimates of string network evolution the signal strength exceeds foregrounds across a broad frequency band.
  • Detection of the SWAG region would simultaneously test the axion dark matter hypothesis and the gauged ultraviolet completion of the Peccei-Quinn symmetry.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Observation of the break could indirectly constrain the scale at which Planck-suppressed operators are suppressed.
  • The same string-wall dynamics might leave related imprints in other cosmological observables such as the axion relic density.
  • Analogous signatures could appear in other models that gauge accidental global symmetries to protect dark matter candidates.

Load-bearing premise

The collapse dynamics of the string-wall network produce a detectable and distinguishable infrared break frequency that remains robust against variations in model parameters and network evolution details.

What would settle it

A detailed simulation or future observation showing that the infrared break frequency is absent, falls well outside the predicted range, or merges indistinguishably with astrophysical foregrounds for breaking scales around 10^14 GeV would falsify the proposed signature.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.14323 by Debasish Borah, Disha Bandyopadhyay, Nayan Das, Rome Samanta.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Interestingly, for n = 4 and moderate values of fg/fa, the model predicts testable values of ¯θ, potentially within reach of future neutron and proton EDM experiments. Furthermore, part of the parameter space is already con￾strained by LIGO-O3 upper limits on the stochastic GW background [82], while the remaining parameter space can be probed by future GW interferometers such as CE [83, 84] and ET [85], as… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Left: Gravitational wave spectra (green, blue, red) for three benchmark values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Axion-photon coupling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Gravitational effects are known to violate global symmetries, threatening the Peccei-Quinn (PQ) solution to the strong CP problem. Ultraviolet completions featuring a gauged $U(1)$ symmetry, where $U(1)_{\rm PQ}$ arises as an accidental global symmetry, can suppress Planck-suppressed operators, enabling high-quality axions in a mass window where it can also account for the observed dark matter (DM) in the Universe. We show that in such models, the spontaneous breaking of the $U(1)$ gauge symmetry generates a strong stochastic gravitational wave background (SGWB) from gauge cosmic string loops. Even in the most conservative scenario, for breaking scales $\gtrsim 10^{14}$ GeV, the SGWB signal strength can exceed astrophysical foregrounds across a broad frequency range. Such quality axion models have a characteristic IR break frequency originating from the dynamics of the string-wall network collapse. We propose this characteristic SGWB frequency-amplitude region, identified as \textit{Signature-Window-Axion-Gravitational waves} (SWAG), to be a novel probe of high-quality axion DM at future space and ground-based interferometers.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that UV completions of the Peccei-Quinn mechanism with a gauged U(1) symmetry yield high-quality axions that can constitute dark matter. Spontaneous breaking of the gauged U(1) produces gauge cosmic strings whose loops generate a stochastic gravitational wave background (SGWB) that, for breaking scales ≳10^14 GeV, exceeds astrophysical foregrounds over a broad frequency range. The collapse of the resulting string-wall network imprints a characteristic infrared break frequency in the SGWB spectrum; the authors identify the corresponding frequency-amplitude region as the SWAG signature and argue it provides a novel probe of such models at future interferometers.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated, the work would establish a concrete link between the quality of the axion solution to the strong-CP problem, its viability as dark matter, and an observable gravitational-wave signature. The identification of a potentially distinctive IR break tied to string-wall dynamics could motivate targeted searches in LISA, ET, and similar instruments, complementing existing axion searches.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; string-wall network paragraph] Abstract and the paragraph on string-wall network collapse: the claim that the IR break frequency is set primarily by the breaking scale and constitutes a robust, distinguishable signature independent of detailed network evolution is load-bearing for the SWAG proposal. Standard cosmic-string-plus-wall calculations show that the low-frequency cutoff and spectral index depend on the wall-to-string tension ratio, the epoch of wall domination, and loop-chopping efficiency; the manuscript provides no explicit derivation, parameter scan, or error estimate demonstrating that the break remains clean and detectable when these quantities vary with the axion mass or UV completion.
  2. [SGWB amplitude discussion] Section discussing SGWB amplitude (likely §3 or §4): the statement that the signal strength exceeds foregrounds for scales ≳10^14 GeV relies on post-hoc scale choices tied to the DM abundance. The manuscript should clarify whether the amplitude calculation is performed with the same breaking scale used for the DM density or whether additional assumptions about loop size and radiation efficiency are introduced; without this, the claimed excess over foregrounds risks circularity.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation] Notation for the breaking scale and axion mass should be introduced once and used consistently; currently the same symbol appears to be reused for the gauge-breaking vev and the effective PQ scale.
  2. [Figures] Figure showing the SGWB spectrum would benefit from explicit shading or curves for the astrophysical foregrounds and for the expected sensitivity of LISA/ET to make the SWAG region visually clear.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive report. The comments raise important points regarding the robustness of the IR break feature and the consistency of the SGWB amplitude calculation with the dark matter abundance. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: Abstract and the paragraph on string-wall network collapse: the claim that the IR break frequency is set primarily by the breaking scale and constitutes a robust, distinguishable signature independent of detailed network evolution is load-bearing for the SWAG proposal. Standard cosmic-string-plus-wall calculations show that the low-frequency cutoff and spectral index depend on the wall-to-string tension ratio, the epoch of wall domination, and loop-chopping efficiency; the manuscript provides no explicit derivation, parameter scan, or error estimate demonstrating that the break remains clean and detectable when these quantities vary with the axion mass or UV completion.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from a clearer justification of the IR break's robustness. In the revised version we have added a dedicated paragraph (new Section 3.2) that sketches the scaling argument for the break frequency in terms of the wall formation epoch, which is set by the gauged U(1) breaking scale. We show that, for the high scales ≳10^14 GeV required by the DM abundance, the wall-to-string tension ratio remains O(1) and the break frequency varies by less than a factor of a few even when loop-chopping efficiency and domination epoch are varied within standard ranges. References to the relevant string-wall literature are included. A full Monte-Carlo scan lies outside the scope of the present work, but the added estimates demonstrate that the feature stays within the LISA/ET bands. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Section discussing SGWB amplitude (likely §3 or §4): the statement that the signal strength exceeds foregrounds for scales ≳10^14 GeV relies on post-hoc scale choices tied to the DM abundance. The manuscript should clarify whether the amplitude calculation is performed with the same breaking scale used for the DM density or whether additional assumptions about loop size and radiation efficiency are introduced; without this, the claimed excess over foregrounds risks circularity.

    Authors: The breaking scale is fixed by the requirement that the axion saturates the observed DM density; the SGWB amplitude is then computed at that same scale using the standard loop-size parameter α≈0.1 and radiation efficiency from the cosmic-string literature. No extra assumptions are introduced. In the revised manuscript we have inserted an explicit statement at the beginning of the amplitude section that links the DM calculation directly to the GW parameters, removing any appearance of circularity and showing that the foreground excess follows for all DM-consistent scales above 10^14 GeV. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in SGWB derivation for high-quality axion models

full rationale

The paper selects breaking scales ≳10^14 GeV such that the axion accounts for observed DM density, then computes the resulting SGWB amplitude and spectrum from gauge cosmic string loops, including an IR break frequency from string-wall network collapse. This is a forward calculation of observable consequences from model parameters using standard cosmic-string GW formulas; the frequency-amplitude region (SWAG) is presented as a derived signature rather than an input or fitted quantity. No self-citations, self-definitions, or renamings reduce the central claim to its own inputs by construction. The derivation is self-contained against external benchmarks of string network dynamics and remains independent of any circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions about cosmic string formation and network evolution in gauged U(1) models, plus the requirement that the axion accounts for DM. No new particles are invented beyond the gauged U(1) and accidental PQ symmetry already standard in the literature.

free parameters (1)
  • U(1) breaking scale
    Chosen ≳10^14 GeV to ensure both high axion quality and DM abundance while producing observable SGWB.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Gauge cosmic strings form upon spontaneous breaking of the U(1) and radiate gravitational waves with standard loop decay spectrum.
    Invoked in the paragraph discussing SGWB from string loops.
  • domain assumption The string-wall network collapses producing a characteristic IR break frequency distinguishable from astrophysical foregrounds.
    Central to the SWAG signature definition.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5750 in / 1618 out tokens · 41384 ms · 2026-05-18T15:31:59.048675+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

146 extracted references · 146 canonical work pages · 55 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    respectively. The vertical shaded region with solid border is ruled out by LIGO-O3 [82] observations while the ones with dotted borders are within reach of future GW experiments CE [83, 84] and ET [85] respectively. wherem a is the zero-temperature axion mass, fixed by the requirement that axions constitute the entirety of dark matter. Assuming the correc...

  2. [2]

    Abel et al.,Measurement of the permanent electric dipole moment of the neutron,Phys

    C. Abel et al.,Measurement of the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron,Phys. Rev. Lett.124 (2020) 081803 [2001.11966]

  3. [3]

    Peccei and H.R

    R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn,CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.38(1977) 1440

  4. [4]

    Peccei and H.R

    R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn,Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. D16(1977) 1791

  5. [5]

    Wilczek,Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys

    F. Wilczek,Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 279

  6. [6]

    Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys

    S. Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys. Rev. Lett.40 (1978) 223

  7. [7]

    Preskill, M.B

    J. Preskill, M.B. Wise and F. Wilczek,Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,Phys. Lett. B120(1983) 127

  8. [8]

    Axions : Theory and Cosmological Role

    M. Kawasaki and K. Nakayama,Axions: Theory and Cosmological Role,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.63 (2013) 69 [1301.1123]

  9. [9]

    The landscape of QCD axion models

    L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti, E. Nardi and L. Visinelli, The landscape of QCD axion models,Phys. Rept.870 (2020) 1 [2003.01100]. [9]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys.641 (2020) A6 [1807.06209]. [10]Particle Data Groupcollaboration,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001

  10. [10]

    Abbott and P

    L.F. Abbott and P. Sikivie,A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion,Phys. Lett. B120(1983) 133

  11. [11]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler,The Not So Harmless Axion, 5 Phys. Lett. B120(1983) 137

  12. [12]

    M. Dine, W. Fischler and M. Srednicki,A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion,Phys. Lett. B104(1981) 199

  13. [13]

    Zhitnitsky,On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions

    A.R. Zhitnitsky,On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian),Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 31(1980) 260

  14. [14]

    Kim,Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance,Phys

    J.E. Kim,Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance,Phys. Rev. Lett.43(1979) 103

  15. [15]

    Shifman, A.I

    M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov,Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong Interactions?,Nucl. Phys. B166(1980) 493

  16. [16]

    Baryogenesis from Strong CP Violation and the QCD Axion

    G. Servant,Baryogenesis from StrongCPViolation and the QCD Axion,Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 171803 [1407.0030]

  17. [17]

    Early Cosmological Period of QCD Confinement

    S. Ipek and T.M.P. Tait,Early Cosmological Period of QCD Confinement,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 112001 [1811.00559]

  18. [18]

    Croon, J.N

    D. Croon, J.N. Howard, S. Ipek and T.M.P. Tait,QCD baryogenesis,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 055042 [1911.01432]

  19. [19]

    Co and K

    R.T. Co and K. Harigaya,Axiogenesis,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 111602 [1910.02080]

  20. [20]

    Planck-Scale Physics and the Peccei-Quinn Mechanism

    M. Kamionkowski and J. March-Russell,Planck scale physics and the Peccei-Quinn mechanism,Phys. Lett. B282(1992) 137 [hep-th/9202003]

  21. [21]

    Solutions to the strong CP problem in a world with gravity

    R. Holman, S.D.H. Hsu, T.W. Kephart, E.W. Kolb, R. Watkins and L.M. Widrow,Solutions to the strong CP problem in a world with gravity,Phys. Lett. B282 (1992) 132 [hep-ph/9203206]

  22. [22]

    Barr and D

    S.M. Barr and D. Seckel,Planck scale corrections to axion models,Phys. Rev. D46(1992) 539

  23. [23]

    Ghigna, M

    S. Ghigna, M. Lusignoli and M. Roncadelli,Instability of the invisible axion,Phys. Lett. B283(1992) 278

  24. [24]

    GRAVITY AND GLOBAL SYMMETRIES

    R. Kallosh, A.D. Linde, D.A. Linde and L. Susskind, Gravity and global symmetries,Phys. Rev. D52 (1995) 912 [hep-th/9502069]

  25. [25]

    Astrophysical Axion Bounds

    G.G. Raffelt,Astrophysical axion bounds,Lect. Notes Phys.741(2008) 51 [hep-ph/0611350]

  26. [26]

    Abbott and M.B

    L.F. Abbott and M.B. Wise,Wormholes and Global Symmetries,Nucl. Phys. B325(1989) 687

  27. [27]

    Coleman and K.-M

    S.R. Coleman and K.-M. Lee,WORMHOLES MADE WITHOUT MASSLESS MATTER FIELDS,Nucl. Phys. B329(1990) 387

  28. [28]

    Alvey and M

    J. Alvey and M. Escudero,The axion quality problem: global symmetry breaking and wormholes,JHEP01 (2021) 032 [2009.03917]

  29. [29]

    Berezhiani and M.Y

    Z.G. Berezhiani and M.Y. Khlopov,Cosmology of Spontaneously Broken Gauge Family Symmetry,Z. Phys. C49(1991) 73

  30. [30]

    K.S. Babu, I. Gogoladze and K. Wang,Stabilizing the axion by discrete gauge symmetries,Phys. Lett. B560 (2003) 214 [hep-ph/0212339]

  31. [31]

    Qiu, J.-W

    Y.-C. Qiu, J.-W. Wang and T.T. Yanagida, High-Quality Axions in a Class of Chiral U(1) Gauge Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 071802 [2301.02345]

  32. [32]

    Accidental Peccei-Quinn symmetry protected to arbitrary order

    L. Di Luzio, E. Nardi and L. Ubaldi,Accidental Peccei-Quinn symmetry protected to arbitrary order, Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 011801 [1704.01122]

  33. [33]

    Protecting the Axion with Local Baryon Number

    M. Duerr, K. Schmidt-Hoberg and J. Unwin, Protecting the Axion with Local Baryon Number,Phys. Lett. B780(2018) 553 [1712.01841]

  34. [34]

    A "Gauged" $U(1)$ Peccei-Quinn Symmetry

    H. Fukuda, M. Ibe, M. Suzuki and T.T. Yanagida,A ”gauged”U(1)Peccei–Quinn symmetry,Phys. Lett. B 771(2017) 327 [1703.01112]

  35. [35]

    M. Ibe, M. Suzuki and T.T. Yanagida,B−Las a Gauged Peccei-Quinn Symmetry,JHEP08(2018) 049 [1805.10029]

  36. [36]

    M. Ardu, L. Di Luzio, G. Landini, A. Strumia, D. Teresi and J.-W. Wang,Axion quality from the (anti)symmetric of SU(N),JHEP11(2020) 090 [2007.12663]

  37. [37]

    K.S. Babu, B. Dutta and R.N. Mohapatra,Hybrid SO(10) Axion Model without Quality Problem,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 111803 [2410.07323]

  38. [38]

    K.S. Babu, B. Dutta and R.N. Mohapatra,Accidental Peccei-Quinn Symmetry From Gauged U(1) and a High Quality Axion,2412.21157

  39. [39]

    Randall,Composite axion models and Planck scale physics,Phys

    L. Randall,Composite axion models and Planck scale physics,Phys. Lett. B284(1992) 77

  40. [40]

    A High Quality Composite Axion

    B. Lillard and T.M.P. Tait,A High Quality Composite Axion,JHEP11(2018) 199 [1811.03089]

  41. [41]

    Color Unifed Dynamical Axion

    M.K. Gaillard, M.B. Gavela, R. Houtz, P. Quilez and R. Del Rey,Color unified dynamical axion,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 972 [1805.06465]

  42. [42]

    Vecchi,Axion quality straight from the GUT,Eur

    L. Vecchi,Axion quality straight from the GUT,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 938 [2106.15224]

  43. [43]

    Peccei-Quinn symmetry from a hidden gauge group structure

    H.-S. Lee and W. Yin,Peccei-Quinn symmetry from a hidden gauge group structure,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 015041 [1811.04039]

  44. [44]

    P. Cox, T. Gherghetta and A. Paul,A common origin for the QCD axion and sterile neutrinos fromSU(5) strong dynamics,JHEP12(2023) 180 [2310.08557]

  45. [45]

    P. Cox, T. Gherghetta and M.D. Nguyen,Light sterile neutrinos and a high-quality axion from a holographic Peccei-Quinn mechanism,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 055011 [2107.14018]

  46. [46]

    Nakai and M

    Y. Nakai and M. Suzuki,Axion Quality from Superconformal Dynamics,Phys. Lett. B816(2021) 136239 [2102.01329]

  47. [47]

    Contino, A

    R. Contino, A. Podo and F. Revello,Chiral models of composite axions and accidental Peccei-Quinn symmetry,JHEP04(2022) 180 [2112.09635]

  48. [48]

    Podo and F

    A. Podo and F. Revello,Integer solutions to the anomaly equations for a class of chiral gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 116020 [2205.03428]

  49. [49]

    Holdom and M.E

    B. Holdom and M.E. Peskin,Raising the Axion Mass, Nucl. Phys. B208(1982) 397

  50. [50]

    Treiman and F

    S.B. Treiman and F. Wilczek,Axion Emission in Decay of Excited Nuclear States,Phys. Lett. B74 (1978) 381

  51. [51]

    Flynn and L

    J.M. Flynn and L. Randall,A Computation of the Small Instanton Contribution to the Axion Potential, Nucl. Phys. B293(1987) 731

  52. [52]

    Gherghetta, V

    T. Gherghetta, V.V. Khoze, A. Pomarol and Y. Shirman,The Axion Mass from 5D Small Instantons,JHEP03(2020) 063 [2001.05610]

  53. [53]

    Strong CP problem and mirror world: the Weinberg Wilczek axion revisited

    Z. Berezhiani, L. Gianfagna and M. Giannotti,Strong CP problem and mirror world: The Weinberg-Wilczek axion revisited,Phys. Lett. B500(2001) 286 [hep-ph/0009290]

  54. [54]

    A collider observable QCD axion

    S. Dimopoulos, A. Hook, J. Huang and G. Marques-Tavares,A collider observable QCD axion, JHEP11(2016) 052 [1606.03097]

  55. [55]

    A. Hook, S. Kumar, Z. Liu and R. Sundrum,High Quality QCD Axion and the LHC,Phys. Rev. Lett. 124(2020) 221801 [1911.12364]. 6

  56. [56]

    Solving the Hierarchy Problem Discretely

    A. Hook,Solving the Hierarchy Problem Discretely, Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 261802 [1802.10093]

  57. [57]

    Banerjee, J

    A. Banerjee, J. Eby and G. Perez,From axion quality and naturalness problems to a high-quality ZN QCD relaxion,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 115011 [2210.05690]

  58. [58]

    A Visible QCD Axion from an Enlarged Color Group

    T. Gherghetta, N. Nagata and M. Shifman,A Visible QCD Axion from an Enlarged Color Group,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 115010 [1604.01127]

  59. [59]

    A QCD Axion from Higher Dimensional Gauge Field

    K.-w. Choi,A QCD axion from higher dimensional gauge field,Phys. Rev. Lett.92(2004) 101602 [hep-ph/0308024]

  60. [60]

    Extra-dimensional axion expectations,

    M. Reece,Extra-dimensional axion expectations,JHEP 07(2025) 130 [2406.08543]

  61. [61]

    Craig and M

    N. Craig and M. Kongsore,High-quality axions from higher-form symmetries in extra dimensions,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 015047 [2408.10295]

  62. [62]

    Axions In String Theory

    P. Svrcek and E. Witten,Axions In String Theory, JHEP06(2006) 051 [hep-th/0605206]

  63. [63]

    Experimental Searches for the Axion and Axion-like Particles

    P.W. Graham, I.G. Irastorza, S.K. Lamoreaux, A. Lindner and K.A. van Bibber,Experimental Searches for the Axion and Axion-Like Particles,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.65(2015) 485 [1602.00039]. [65]F ASERcollaboration,FASER’s physics reach for long-lived particles,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 095011 [1811.12522]

  64. [64]

    Searching for Long-lived Particles: A Compact Detector for Exotics at LHCb

    V.V. Gligorov, S. Knapen, M. Papucci and D.J. Robinson,Searching for Long-lived Particles: A Compact Detector for Exotics at LHCb,Phys. Rev. D 97(2018) 015023 [1708.09395]

  65. [65]

    J.P. Chou, D. Curtin and H.J. Lubatti,New Detectors to Explore the Lifetime Frontier,Phys. Lett. B767 (2017) 29 [1606.06298]

  66. [66]

    J.L. Feng, I. Galon, F. Kling and S. Trojanowski, Axionlike particles at FASER: The LHC as a photon beam dump,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 055021 [1806.02348]

  67. [67]

    Chakraborty, M

    S. Chakraborty, M. Kraus, V. Loladze, T. Okui and K. Tobioka,Heavy QCD axion in b→s transition: Enhanced limits and projections,Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 055036 [2102.04474]

  68. [68]

    Bertholet, S

    E. Bertholet, S. Chakraborty, V. Loladze, T. Okui, A. Soffer and K. Tobioka,Heavy QCD axion at Belle II: Displaced and prompt signals,Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) L071701 [2108.10331]

  69. [69]

    Kelly, S

    K.J. Kelly, S. Kumar and Z. Liu,Heavy axion opportunities at the DUNE near detector,Phys. Rev. D 103(2021) 095002 [2011.05995]

  70. [70]

    Zambujal Ferreira, A

    R. Zambujal Ferreira, A. Notari, O. Pujolàs and F. Rompineve,High Quality QCD Axion at Gravitational Wave Observatories,Phys. Rev. Lett. 128(2022) 141101 [2107.07542]

  71. [71]

    Dunsky, L.J

    D.I. Dunsky, L.J. Hall and K. Harigaya,A heavy QCD axion and the mirror world,JHEP02(2024) 212 [2302.04274]

  72. [72]

    Kibble,Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings,J

    T.W.B. Kibble,Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings,J. Phys. A9(1976) 1387

  73. [73]

    Cosmic strings

    M.B. Hindmarsh and T.W.B. Kibble,Cosmic strings, Rept. Prog. Phys.58(1995) 477 [hep-ph/9411342]

  74. [74]

    Vilenkin and A.E

    A. Vilenkin and A.E. Everett,Cosmic Strings and Domain Walls in Models with Goldstone and PseudoGoldstone Bosons,Phys. Rev. Lett.48(1982) 1867

  75. [75]

    Gravitational wave background from hybrid topological defects

    X. Martin and A. Vilenkin,Gravitational wave background from hybrid topological defects,Phys. Rev. Lett.77(1996) 2879 [astro-ph/9606022]. [78]LISAcollaboration,Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,arXiv e-prints(2017) arXiv:1702.00786 [1702.00786]

  76. [76]

    Advanced LIGO

    S. Kawamura et al.,The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO,Class. Quant. Grav.23 (2006) S125. [80]LIGO Scientificcollaboration,Advanced LIGO, Class. Quant. Grav.32(2015) 074001 [1411.4547]

  77. [77]

    Planck Scale Symmetry Breaking and Majoron Physics

    I.Z. Rothstein, K.S. Babu and D. Seckel,Planck scale symmetry breaking and majoron physics,Nucl. Phys. B 403(1993) 725 [hep-ph/9301213]. [82]KAGRA, Virgo, LIGO Scientificcollaboration, Upper limits on the isotropic gravitational-wave background from Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo’s third observing run,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 022004 [2101.12130]. [83]LIGO ...

  78. [78]

    Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO

    D. Reitze et al.,Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO,Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51(2019) 035 [1907.04833]

  79. [79]

    Punturo et al.,The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,Class

    M. Punturo et al.,The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,Class. Quant. Grav.27(2010) 194002. [86]nEDMcollaboration,A New Cryogenic Apparatus to Search for the Neutron Electric Dipole Moment,JINST 14(2019) P11017 [1908.09937]

  80. [80]

    Omarov, H

    Z. Omarov, H. Davoudiasl, S. Haciomeroglu, V. Lebedev, W.M. Morse, Y.K. Semertzidis et al., Comprehensive symmetric-hybrid ring design for a proton EDM experiment at below 10-29e·cm,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 032001 [2007.10332]

Showing first 80 references.