pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.08676 · v2 · submitted 2025-07-11 · 🪐 quant-ph

Magic Steady State Production: Non-Hermitian, Dissipative, and Stochastic Pathways

Pablo Martinez-Azcona , Matthieu Sarkis , Alexandre Tkatchenko , Aur\'elia Chenu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 04:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords magic statesnon-Hermitian dynamicssteady statesquantum magicdissipative systemsqubit engineeringmagic state preparation
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Non-Hermitian dynamics prepare pure magic steady states that attract all initial qubit states.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a protocol using non-Hermitian dynamics to prepare magic steady states in qubits. These states, such as the |H> and |T> states, act as attractors so that every point on the Bloch sphere flows to the target without needing a particular starting state. This matters for quantum computing because magic states enable universal operations beyond what stabilizer states allow, and this method simplifies preparation by removing initialization requirements. The authors also examine how adding classical noise affects convergence and propose a dissipative protocol plus a cat-qubit implementation.

Core claim

By engineering non-Hermitian dynamics in the dissipative qubit, the |H⟩ and |T⟩ states become pure steady-state attractors to which all initial states converge, providing a state-independent way to produce high-magic states.

What carries the argument

The non-Hermitian evolution or anti-Hermitian term added to the qubit dynamics that creates pure attractors at the magic states.

If this is right

  • All Bloch sphere states converge to the target magic state under the optimal parameters.
  • The approach remains effective in certain regimes of added classical noise in the anti-Hermitian part.
  • A dissipative protocol offers an alternative to non-Hermitian methods for magic state preparation.
  • The non-Hermitian scheme can be realized in a cat qubit system.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This method could reduce the overhead in magic state distillation by relaxing the need for precise initial state preparation.
  • Connecting to error-corrected quantum computation, such attractors might stabilize logical magic states in larger codes.
  • Testing in open quantum systems experiments would reveal how well the purity and magic content hold under realistic decoherence.

Load-bearing premise

The non-Hermitian dynamics can be engineered in a physical qubit system while preserving pure steady states with high magic content.

What would settle it

An experiment showing whether arbitrary initial states on the Bloch sphere reach the target |H> or |T> state with high fidelity under the proposed non-Hermitian qubit evolution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.08676 by Alexandre Tkatchenko, Aur\'elia Chenu, Matthieu Sarkis, Pablo Martinez-Azcona.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Bloch sphere representation of (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Phase diagram for the magic of the analytical steady state ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Phase diagram of the magic of the analytical steady state ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Success rate for: x (red) and xy (blue) models at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Streamlines of the vector field in the Bloch sphere for different parameters ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Phase diagram of the steady state SRE times the dissipative gap for the SDQ with real (left) and complex (right) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Universal quantum computers require entanglement and non-stabilizerness, a resource known as \textit{quantum magic}. Here, we introduce a protocol that prepares magic steady states by leveraging non-Hermitian dynamics, which, contrary to unitary dynamics, can host pure-state attractors. By studying the dissipative qubit, we find the optimal parameters to prepare $|H\rangle$ and $|T\rangle$ steady states. Interestingly, this approach does not require knowledge or preparation of a particular initial state, since all the states of the Bloch sphere converge to the engineered target steady state. We also consider the addition of classical noise in the anti-hermitian part and provide the regimes for which the noisy dynamics still converges to high magic states. We also introduce a dissipative protocol to prepare magic steady states, compare the approaches with magic state cultivation and provide a particular realization of the non-Hermitian scheme in a cat qubit.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces protocols to prepare magic steady states |H⟩ and |T⟩ in a qubit using non-Hermitian dynamics, claiming optimal parameters exist such that all initial Bloch-sphere states converge to these pure attractors independent of starting point. It extends the analysis to classical noise in the anti-Hermitian term, presents a dissipative protocol, compares both to magic-state cultivation, and outlines a cat-qubit realization.

Significance. If the central claims on global convergence to pure high-magic states hold under physical realizations, the work would provide an initialization-independent route to magic resources that could complement distillation methods in fault-tolerant architectures. The noise-robustness analysis and concrete cat-qubit mapping add practical relevance.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3, Eq. (7): the assertion that the engineered anti-Hermitian term produces a unique dominant pure eigenvector with all other Bloch vectors converging to it is load-bearing for the 'no initial-state preparation' claim, yet the manuscript provides neither an analytic proof that the real-part gap remains strictly positive nor numerical diagonalization confirming purity >0.99 across the sphere.
  2. [§5] §5, around Eq. (15): when classical noise is added to the anti-Hermitian part, the regimes claimed to preserve 'high magic' are identified only by example trajectories; no bound is derived on how noise amplitude degrades the steady-state purity or the magic measure, leaving the robustness statement unsupported.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states 'optimal parameters' without specifying the figure of merit (fidelity, convergence rate, or magic content); this should be stated explicitly in the introduction.
  2. [Figure 3] Figure captions for the Bloch-sphere plots would benefit from explicit labels indicating which curves correspond to which initial states and the target |H⟩ or |T⟩.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments, which have helped us identify areas where the manuscript can be strengthened. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to provide additional supporting evidence for our claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3, Eq. (7): the assertion that the engineered anti-Hermitian term produces a unique dominant pure eigenvector with all other Bloch vectors converging to it is load-bearing for the 'no initial-state preparation' claim, yet the manuscript provides neither an analytic proof that the real-part gap remains strictly positive nor numerical diagonalization confirming purity >0.99 across the sphere.

    Authors: We agree that explicit verification strengthens the central claim. While a fully analytic proof of a strictly positive real-part gap for arbitrary parameters remains challenging, we have conducted numerical diagonalization of the non-Hermitian operator at the optimal parameters reported in the manuscript. These calculations confirm a positive real-part gap and a dominant eigenvector with purity exceeding 0.99 that matches the target |H⟩ or |T⟩ state. We will add these results to the revised manuscript, including the eigenvalue spectrum and convergence statistics sampled across the Bloch sphere from random initial states. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5] §5, around Eq. (15): when classical noise is added to the anti-Hermitian part, the regimes claimed to preserve 'high magic' are identified only by example trajectories; no bound is derived on how noise amplitude degrades the steady-state purity or the magic measure, leaving the robustness statement unsupported.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the noise analysis currently relies on representative trajectories. In the revision we will supplement this with a perturbative estimate of the noise-induced degradation of purity and magic, together with systematic numerical sweeps over noise amplitude. These additions will delineate quantitative bounds on the noise strength that keep the steady-state magic above a chosen threshold, thereby placing the robustness claim on firmer footing. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: derivation relies on explicit construction of non-Hermitian effective dynamics whose attractor property is verified by direct solution of the Bloch equations.

full rationale

The paper constructs an effective non-Hermitian Hamiltonian for the dissipative qubit such that the target magic state is the eigenvector with largest real-part eigenvalue; the convergence of all initial Bloch vectors is then shown by solving the resulting linear ODE on the Bloch sphere. This is a direct, parameter-dependent calculation rather than a fit renamed as prediction or a self-citation chain. No load-bearing step reduces to a prior result by the same authors that itself assumes the target conclusion. The physical-engineering discussion (cat-qubit realization, noise robustness) is presented as an independent check on the mathematical attractor, not as a re-derivation of the same equations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The protocol rests on the domain assumption that non-Hermitian terms can be added to qubit dynamics to produce pure-state attractors to magic states, plus the existence of optimal parameters that achieve convergence from any initial state.

free parameters (1)
  • optimal non-Hermitian parameters
    Chosen to prepare |H> and |T> steady states as stated in the abstract
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Non-Hermitian dynamics can host pure-state attractors, unlike unitary dynamics
    Explicitly contrasted with unitary dynamics in the abstract

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5695 in / 1183 out tokens · 50236 ms · 2026-05-19T04:47:52.414616+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Entanglement Dynamics with a Stochastic Non-Hermitian Hamiltonian away from Exceptional Points

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Stochastic noise in non-Hermitian qubit systems away from exceptional points allows for highly efficient entanglement generation on timescales shorter than Hermitian or EP-based methods, independent of qubit number.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    • Case Υ = 1−i√ 2 J, δ = 0: In the case of complex cou- pling and zero detuning, the SRE reduces to M2 = − log2 1 − 4J2(Γ2 − 3J2) Γ4

    In the large decay limit, the SRE obeys the asymptotic expansion M2 ∼ 4J2/(ln(2)Γ2). • Case Υ = 1−i√ 2 J, δ = 0: In the case of complex cou- pling and zero detuning, the SRE reduces to M2 = − log2 1 − 4J2(Γ2 − 3J2) Γ4 . (7) Its maximal value of log2(3/2) ≈ 0.585 ≡ M(T) 2 is reached at Γ = √ 6J. This value corresponds to |ψ+⟩ being a |T ⟩ state with maxima...

    work page

  2. [2]

    This happens at γJ ≈ 0.065, Γ/J ≈ 3.599 (white star)

    ≈ 0.415 but rather M2 ≈ 0.450, as numerically found. This happens at γJ ≈ 0.065, Γ/J ≈ 3.599 (white star). The plot highlights (orange dash-dotted line) the two regions in which ˜M s 2 > M (H) s = log2( 4 3). We observe that the PT -broken phase (2 ≤ Γ J ≤ 1 2γJ ) has a region of high magic which broadens as the noise strength in- creases, attaining the p...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Same for the average trajectory E(ˆϱt) (gradient thick line, the color represents time go- ing from red to purple)

    The single trajecto- ries (gray) in the cross section (x = 0) of the Bloch sphere are seen to converge to the steady state (black square) described analytically. Same for the average trajectory E(ˆϱt) (gradient thick line, the color represents time go- ing from red to purple). The SRE for single trajectories, illustrated in Fig.2(d;e), shows interesting b...

    work page

  4. [4]

    BroadApp

    and thus we are preparing maximally magical states, starting from a resourceless mixed state, using the anti-dephasing dynamics shown by stochastic non-Hermitian Hamiltonians. Quantum jumps hinder non-stabilizerness — We now look at a more general framework and discuss the effect of quantum jumps on magic. Consider a generic system of L qubits with densit...

    work page arXiv

  5. [5]

    The Heisenberg Representation of Quantum Computers

    D. Gottesman, The heisenberg representation of quan- tum computers (1998), arXiv:quant-ph/9807006 [quant- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  6. [6]

    Veitch, S

    V. Veitch, S. A. Hamed Mousavian, D. Gottesman, and J. Emerson, The resource theory of stabilizer quantum computation, New Journal of Physics 16, 013009 (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Bravyi and A

    S. Bravyi and A. Kitaev, Universal quantum computa- tion with ideal clifford gates and noisy ancillas, Phys. Rev. A 71, 022316 (2005)

    work page 2005

  8. [8]

    Cusumano, L

    S. Cusumano, L. C. Venuti, S. Cepollaro, G. Espos- ito, D. Iannotti, B. Jasser, J. O. c, M. Viscardi, and A. Hamma, Non-stabilizerness and violations of chsh in- equalities (2025), arXiv:2504.03351 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Howard and E

    M. Howard and E. Campbell, Application of a resource theory for magic states to fault-tolerant quantum com- puting, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 090501 (2017)

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    Howard, J

    M. Howard, J. Wallman, V. Veitch, and J. Emerson, Con- textuality supplies the ‘magic’ for quantum computation, Nature 510, 351–355 (2014)

    work page 2014

  11. [11]

    Leone, S

    L. Leone, S. F. E. Oliviero, and A. Hamma, Stabilizer r´ enyi entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 050402 (2022)

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    S. F. E. Oliviero, L. Leone, A. Hamma, and S. Lloyd, Measuring magic on a quantum processor, Npj Quantum Inf. 8, 10.1038/s41534-022-00666-5 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41534-022-00666-5 2022

  13. [13]

    Leone and L

    L. Leone and L. Bittel, Stabilizer entropies are mono- tones for magic-state resource theory, Phys. Rev. A 110, L040403 (2024)

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Bravyi and J

    S. Bravyi and J. Haah, Magic-state distillation with low overhead, Phys. Rev. A 86, 052329 (2012)

    work page 2012

  15. [15]

    A. M. Meier, B. Eastin, and E. Knill, Magic-state distil- lation with the four-qubit code (2012), arXiv:1204.4221 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  16. [16]

    J. Haah, M. B. Hastings, D. Poulin, and D. Wecker, Magic state distillation with low space overhead and op- timal asymptotic input count, Quantum 1, 31 (2017)

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    P. S. Rodriguez, J. M. Robinson, P. N. Jepsen, Z. He, C. Duckering, C. Zhao, K.-H. Wu, J. Campo, K. Bagnall, and M. K. et al., Experimental demonstration of logical magic state distillation (2024), arXiv:2412.15165 [quant- ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Verstraete, M

    F. Verstraete, M. M. Wolf, and J. Ignacio Cirac, Quan- tum computation and quantum-state engineering driven by dissipation, Nature Physics 5, 633–636 (2009)

    work page 2009

  19. [19]

    Y. Lin, J. P. Gaebler, F. Reiter, T. R. Tan, R. Bowler, A. S. Sørensen, D. Leibfried, and D. J. Wineland, Dissi- pative production of a maximally entangled steady state of two quantum bits, Nature 504, 415–418 (2013)

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    Niroula, C

    P. Niroula, C. D. White, Q. Wang, S. Johri, D. Zhu, C. Monroe, C. Noel, and M. J. Gullans, Phase transition in magic with random quantum circuits, Nature Physics 20, 1786–1792 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Turkeshi, E

    X. Turkeshi, E. Tirrito, and P. Sierant, Magic spread- ing in random quantum circuits, Nat. Commun. 16, 10.1038/s41467-025-57704-x (2025)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-57704-x 2025

  22. [22]

    Sierant, P

    P. Sierant, P. Stornati, and X. Turkeshi, Fermionic magic resources of quantum many-body systems (2025), arXiv:2506.00116 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Turkeshi, A

    X. Turkeshi, A. Dymarsky, and P. Sierant, Pauli spec- trum and nonstabilizerness of typical quantum many- body states, Phys. Rev. B 111, 054301 (2025)

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Bera and M

    S. Bera and M. Schir` o, Non-stabilizerness of sachdev-ye- kitaev model (2025), arXiv:2502.01582 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Jasser, J

    B. Jasser, J. Odavic, and A. Hamma, Stabilizer entropy and entanglement complexity in the sachdev-ye-kitaev model (2025), arXiv:2502.03093 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    P. R. N. Falc˜ ao, P. Sierant, J. Zakrzewski, and E. Tirrito, Magic dynamics in many-body localized systems (2025), 7 arXiv:2503.07468 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    C. D. White, C. Cao, and B. Swingle, Conformal field theories are magical, Phys. Rev. B 103, 075145 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Sarkis and A

    M. Sarkis and A. Tkatchenko, Are molecules magi- cal? non-stabilizerness in molecular bonding (2025), arXiv:2504.06673 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Sticlet, B

    D. Sticlet, B. D´ ora, D. Szombathy, G. Zar´ and, and C. P. Moca, Non-stabilizerness in open xxz spin chains: Uni- versal scaling and dynamics (2025), arXiv:2504.11139 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    F. B. Trigueros and J. A. M. Guzm´ an, Nonstabilizer- ness and error resilience in noisy quantum circuits (2025), arXiv:2506.18976 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University PressOxford, 2007)

    work page 2007

  32. [32]

    Rivas and S

    A. Rivas and S. F. Huelga, Open Quantum Systems: An Introduction (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012)

    work page 2012

  33. [33]

    H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn, Quantum Measure- ment and Control (Cambridge University Press, 2009)

    work page 2009

  34. [34]

    Jacobs, Quantum Measurement Theory and its Appli- cations (Cambridge University Press, 2014)

    K. Jacobs, Quantum Measurement Theory and its Appli- cations (Cambridge University Press, 2014)

    work page 2014

  35. [35]

    Wang and A

    Y.-X. Wang and A. A. Clerk, Non-hermitian dynamics without dissipation in quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A 99, 063834 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real spectra in non- hermitian hamiltonians having pt symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5243 (1998)

    work page 1998

  37. [37]

    Mostafazadeh, Pseudo-hermiticity versus pt symme- try: The necessary condition for the reality of the spec- trum of a non-hermitian hamiltonian, J

    A. Mostafazadeh, Pseudo-hermiticity versus pt symme- try: The necessary condition for the reality of the spec- trum of a non-hermitian hamiltonian, J. Math. Phys. 43, 205–214 (2002)

    work page 2002

  38. [38]

    A. A. Budini, Quantum systems subject to the action of classical stochastic fields, Phys. Rev. A 64, 052110 (2001)

    work page 2001

  39. [39]

    Kiely, Exact classical noise master equations: Ap- plications and connections, Europhys

    A. Kiely, Exact classical noise master equations: Ap- plications and connections, Europhys. Lett. 134, 10001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Chenu, M

    A. Chenu, M. Beau, J. Cao, and A. del Campo, Quantum simulation of generic many-body open system dynamics using classical noise, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 140403 (2017)

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    Martinez-Azcona, A

    P. Martinez-Azcona, A. Kundu, A. del Campo, and A. Chenu, Stochastic operator variance: An observable to diagnose noise and scrambling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 160202 (2023)

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    Martinez-Azcona, A

    P. Martinez-Azcona, A. Kundu, A. Saxena, A. del Campo, and A. Chenu, Quantum dynamics with stochas- tic non-hermitian hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 010402 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    Abbasi, W

    M. Abbasi, W. Chen, M. Naghiloo, Y. N. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, Topological quantum state control through exceptional-point proximity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 160401 (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    Z.-Z. Li, W. Chen, M. Abbasi, K. W. Murch, and K. B. Whaley, Speeding up entanglement generation by prox- imity to higher-order exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 100202 (2023)

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    Naghiloo, M

    M. Naghiloo, M. Abbasi, Y. N. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, Quantum state tomography across the excep- tional point in a single dissipative qubit, Nature Physics 15, 1232–1236 (2019)

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    Quinn, J

    A. Quinn, J. Metzner, J. E. Muldoon, I. D. Moore, S. Brudney, S. Das, D. T. C. Allcock, and Y. N. Joglekar, Observing super-quantum correlations across the excep- tional point in a single, two-level trapped ion (2023), arXiv:2304.12413 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Wakefield, A

    R. Wakefield, A. Laing, and Y. N. Joglekar, Non- hermiticity in quantum nonlinear optics through symplectic transformations, Appl. Phys. Lett. 124, 10.1063/5.0206393 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0206393 2024

  48. [48]

    I. L. Paiva, A. Te’eni, B. Y. Peled, E. Cohen, and Y. Aharonov, Non-inertial quantum clock frames lead to non-hermitian dynamics, Communications Physics 5, 10.1038/s42005-022-01081-0 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-022-01081-0 2022

  49. [49]

    Mochizuki and R

    K. Mochizuki and R. Hamazaki, Distinguishability tran- sitions in nonunitary boson-sampling dynamics, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 013177 (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    Computational Complexity and Simulability of Non-Hermitian Quantum Dynamics

    B. Barch and D. Lidar, Computational complex- ity of non-hermitian quantum systems (2025), arXiv:2506.03435 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Gottesman, Stabilizer codes and quantum error correc- tion

    D. Gottesman, Stabilizer codes and quantum error correc- tion. Caltech Ph. D, Ph.D. thesis, Caltech, eprint: quant- ph/9705052 (1997)

    work page arXiv 1997

  52. [52]

    Gottesman, Theory of fault-tolerant quantum compu- tation, Phys

    D. Gottesman, Theory of fault-tolerant quantum compu- tation, Phys. Rev. A 57, 127 (1998)

    work page 1998

  53. [53]

    Aaronson and D

    S. Aaronson and D. Gottesman, Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits, Phys. Rev. A 70, 052328 (2004)

    work page 2004

  54. [54]

    Haug and L

    T. Haug and L. Piroli, Stabilizer entropies and nonstabi- lizerness monotones, Quantum 7, 1092 (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Y.-M. Ding, Z. Wang, and Z. Yan, Evaluating many- body stabilizer r´ enyi entropy by sampling reduced pauli strings: singularities, volume law, and nonlocal magic (2025), arXiv:2501.12146 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Karmakar, P

    T. Karmakar, P. Lewalle, Y. Zhang, and K. B. Whaley, Noise-Canceling Quantum Feedback: non-Hermitian Dy- namics with Applications to State Preparation and Magic State Distillation, (2025), arXiv:2507.05611 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Tirrito, L

    E. Tirrito, L. Lumia, A. Paviglianiti, G. Lami, A. Silva, X. Turkeshi, and M. Collura, Magic phase transitions in monitored gaussian fermions (2025), arXiv:2507.07179 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    1 22n X µ,ν ⟨σµ, ˆρ⟩⟨σν, ˆρ⟩⟨σµ, σν⟩ # = − log2

    P. E. Kloeden and E. Platen, Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations (Springer Berlin Hei- delberg, 1992). 8 Details on the Dissipative Qubit Steady state SRE with detuning In the case Jy = 0 and Jx = J ̸= 0, δ ̸= 0 the SRE of the steady state reads M2 =log 2   128 J4(Γ − ΩI)4+ 1 256 (Γ−ΩI)2 −4J2 + (δ+ΩR)2 4 + 1 256 (Γ−ΩI)2+4J2+(δ+ΩR)2 4...

    work page 1992