Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 24 references

Generalized Beth-Uhlenbeck approach to the thermodynamics of quark-hadron matter

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Chemical freeze-out in heavy-ion collisions is set by the Mott dissociation of hadrons, the temperature at which quark binding vanishes at the chiral crossover.

desk verdict A transparent proceedings that repackages the group's Beth-Uhlenbeck EoS and adds a schematic freeze-out–Mott demonstration; the coincidence is constructed, not yet predicted. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.10497 v1 pith:JC7RIG7K submitted 2025-07-14 hep-ph nucl-th

David Blaschke , Oleksii Ivanytskyi , Gerd Röpke This is my paper
classification hep-phnucl-th
keywords quark-hadronmatterBeth-UhlenbeckequationofstateMottdissociationchemicalfreeze-outclustervirialexpansionchiralcrossoverheavy-ioncollisionsQCDphasediagram
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper builds a unified equation of state for the transition between hadronic matter and quark matter by treating hadrons as bound states of quarks that dissolve when quark occupation blocks their binding. The framework, a cluster virial expansion with in-medium hadron phase shifts, reproduces lattice QCD thermodynamics at small chemical potential and extends to regions of the QCD phase diagram where lattice simulations suffer the sign problem. Its central application is a microscopic justification of a long-observed coincidence: chemical freeze-out in heavy-ion collisions happens exactly when hadrons undergo Mott dissociation at the chiral crossover. If the argument is right, freeze-out temperatures are not free parameters but are fixed by the vanishing binding energy of each hadron species, and the same equation of state can be used for early-universe and neutron-star matter.

What carries the argument

The central object is the generalized Beth-Uhlenbeck density formula, in which each hadron species contributes through in-medium phase shifts $\delta_{n_i}(\omega,q)$ built from multi-quark cluster Green's functions in a two-loop $\Phi$-derivable ('sunset') approximation. Bound states appear as phase-shift resonances, and Polyakov-loop modified distribution functions suppress colored clusters in the confined region. The Mott dissociation mechanism is carried by the divergence law: as the chiral condensate drops, the constituent quark mass falls, the binding energy $E_B=|2m_q(T)-m_\pi(T)|$ vanishes at the Mott temperature, and the hadron radius diverges. Combined with the geometric scaling law $\sigma_{ij}=\lambda\langle r_i^2\rangle\langle r_j^2\rangle$ that ties cross sections to radii, this makes the reaction rate $\tau_i^{-1}$ jump by orders of magnitude, so the freeze-out condition is fulfilled at the Mott point.

What would settle it

A lattice QCD or self-consistent gap-equation calculation showing that the in-medium pion radius stays finite through the chiral crossover, without the $\langle r^2\rangle^{1/2}\sim|T-T_{\rm Mott}|^{-1/2}$ divergence, would rule out the sudden-switch mechanism; alternatively, heavy-ion data showing pion and kaon freeze-out well above or below $T_c\simeq 156.5$ MeV would contradict the freeze-out coincidence.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the chemical freeze-out of hadrons in an expanding, cooling quark-gluon plasma is not set by an arbitrary decoupling temperature but by the Mott dissociation of each hadron species. In the generalized Beth-Uhlenbeck approach, hadrons are multi-quark clusters whose bound states appear as resonances in phase shifts; when the light-quark mass drops at the chiral crossover, hadron binding energies vanish, their radii diverge as $\langle r^2\rangle^{1/2}\sim|T-T_{\rm Mott}|^{-1/2}$, and the reaction rates jump by 3-4 orders of magnitude, so the reaction-kinetic condition $H_{\rm exp}(T_{\rm cf,i})=\tau_i^{-1}(T_{\rm cf,i})$ is satisfied exactly at the Mott temperature. This provides a microscopic justification for the coincidence of chemical freeze-out with the lattice QCD chiral crossover temperature $T_c\simeq 156.5$ MeV. The same equation of state reproduces lattice QCD thermodynamics at vanishing baryon chemical potential and is usable at large chemical potentials where lattice QCD cannot be directly simulated.

Load-bearing premise

Everything hinges on quark masses falling abruptly at the chiral crossover so that hadron radii and reaction rates jump suddenly; if the mass drop is smooth, freeze-out need not wait for the Mott temperature.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At vanishing baryon chemical potential, the model's scaled entropy density $s/T^3$ and pressure $p/T^4$ match lattice QCD results, so the unified equation of state can be integrated smoothly across the quark-hadron transition.
  • Pions and kaons, which carry most of the entropy below the crossover, freeze out at the chiral restoration temperature because the Mott-driven jump in their reaction rates makes the freeze-out condition hold right at $T_c\simeq 156.5$ MeV.
  • Hadron radii diverge as $\langle r^2\rangle^{1/2}\sim|T-T_{\rm Mott}|^{-1/2}$ at the Mott temperature, so geometric cross sections and reaction rates diverge there, freezing the hadron composition immediately.
  • The same reaction-kinetic logic, previously applied to nuclear clusters such as alpha particles at lower freeze-out temperatures, is extended here to the high-energy heavy-ion regime near the chiral crossover.
  • Because the equation of state is not limited by the sign problem, the framework can be applied to hybrid neutron star structure, supernova explosions, binary neutron star mergers, and primordial black hole formation at the QCD transition.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A species-by-species freeze-out pattern follows from the framework: hadrons with different Mott temperatures should freeze out at different times, which could be tested against experimental yields of pions, kaons, protons, and hyperons in heavy-ion collisions.
  • If the quark mass drop at the chiral crossover turns out to be smooth rather than abrupt, the order-of-magnitude reaction-rate jump that pins freeze-out to the Mott temperature could disappear; the equation of state might survive, but the freeze-out coincidence would need a different mechanism.
  • The geometric scaling of cross sections with in-medium radii could be tested in a separate calculation of charmonium dissociation in a hot pion gas, where the quark-exchange mechanism the paper cites should produce the same radius-dependent enhancement.
  • For compact-star applications, the framework predicts a deconfinement transition at large baryon chemical potential whose order (crossover versus first-order) could be compared with gravitational-wave constraints on neutron star radii.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This proceedings paper presents a generalized Beth-Uhlenbeck (cluster virial expansion) approach to a unified equation of state for quark-hadron matter. Hadrons are treated as multiquark bound states and continuum correlations, with quark and gluon quasiparticles described by a Polyakov-loop Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model plus perturbative corrections. The authors compare the resulting entropy density and pressure at vanishing baryochemical potential with lattice QCD data (Fig. 2) and then apply a reaction-kinetic freeze-out criterion, Eq. (10), together with a Povh-Hüfner geometric scaling of hadronic cross sections and medium-dependent hadron radii, to argue that chemical freeze-out in ultra-relativistic heavy-ion collisions coincides with the Mott dissociation of hadrons at the chiral crossover temperature. The paper concludes with proposed applications to primordial black hole formation and neutron star mergers.

Significance. If the central claim were established, it would provide a microscopic explanation of the empirical near-coincidence between chemical freeze-out temperatures and the chiral crossover temperature, and it would strengthen the case for using this class of effective models at finite baryon chemical potential where lattice QCD is limited. The paper has genuine strengths: the generalized Beth-Uhlenbeck framework is systematic and transparent, the μ_B=0 entropy and pressure curves in Fig. 2 are in good agreement with lattice data, and the authors are explicitly candid about the main approximation, the sudden-switch quark-mass profile, and about the need for a self-consistent gap-equation solution. The freeze-out construction is concrete and falsifiable, which makes it useful even if the current calculation is not yet the final justification. However, as explained below, the coincidence is presently more an input-driven consequence than a robust prediction.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4 and §3, Eqs. (15)–(17), Fig. 3] The central claim that chemical freeze-out coincides with the Mott transition is not yet a microscopic justification, because the coincidence is largely built into the input. The quark-mass profile M_f(T) is a 'sudden switch model' whose only support, in the paper's own words in Section 4, is the expectation that a future self-consistent gap-equation solution 'would exhibit a behaviour which justifies' the assumption. The step-up+continuum phase shift in Fig. 1 (right) is an ansatz rather than a solution of the cluster wave equation. Since T_c = 156.5 MeV is taken from lattice QCD [9] and the mass drop and Mott localization are placed at that same temperature, Eq. (10) returning T_cf ≈ T_c is not a prediction. Moreover, in a smooth chiral crossover the |T - T_Mott|^{-1/2} divergence of Eq. (17) would be moderated, and the 3–4 order-of-magnitude jump in τ^{-1}_i shown in Fig. 3 could disappear. Please test the sensitivity of T_cf to a smooth mass profile (for example, a tanh profile with width 10–30 MeV) and to a correspondingly continuous phase shift, and report how the freeze-out temperature moves. If that test is not feasible in this proceedings format, the conclusion should be reframed as a demonstration under the sudden-switch assumption rather than a microscopic justification.
  2. [§3, after Eq. (18)] The physical logic connecting a diverging reaction rate to freeze-out is unclear. The text states that at the Mott temperature the pion radius diverges, so the cross section (13) diverges and 'chemical equilibrium is quickly established,' and then immediately concludes that the hadron distribution 'freezes out immediately.' These statements describe opposite regimes: a diverging collision rate maintains chemical equilibrium, whereas freeze-out requires the reaction rate to fall below the expansion rate. Please specify the time ordering (presumably freeze-out occurs after the system passes through the Mott spike and the radii shrink on the hadronic side) and clarify on which side of T_c Eq. (10) is evaluated. In addition, specify whether the reactions in Eq. (12) are inelastic/chemical reactions; if they are elastic scatterings, the relaxation time is not the chemical equilibration time.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Fig. 2] The abstract claims consistency with lattice QCD 'at zero and small chemical potentials,' but the only lattice comparisons shown are at μ_B/T = 0. Either show a small-μ_B comparison or soften the claim to zero chemical potential.
  2. [§2, Eq. (5)] The expression for the density integrand, 'n f_phi^{(a_i),+} - [f_phi^{(a_i),-}]^*', is typeset ambiguously; please add parentheses and define the bracket notation explicitly.
  3. [Fig. 1 (right)] The step-up+continuum phase shift is central to the freeze-out calculation, but its quantitative parameters (step height, continuum threshold, width) are not given in the text or caption. Please provide the explicit functional form of δ_{n_i}(ω,q).
  4. [§3, Eq. (11)] The constant a = 2.86 enters the extraction of T_cf directly; it is only cited to [17]. Please state its origin and the range of values considered in the text.
  5. [§1] The term 'inverse Mott effect' is used in the introduction before it is defined; please define it at first use.
  6. [General] The text contains many missing spaces between words due to LaTeX source artifacts (for example, 'Wepresentaunifiedapproach...'); please fix these in the final version.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 7.0 of 10

The freeze-out–Mott coincidence is built in: an assumed sudden quark-mass switch anchored at the lattice T_c forces the freeze-out temperature to equal T_c.

  1. self definitional [Sec. 2 and Sec. 3, Eqs. (15)-(17); Sec. 4]
    "We focus our interest on the QCD transition from a QGP to hadronic matter at the pseudocritical temperature Tc = 156.5 MeV [9] ... The Mott dissociation of hadrons is driven by a sudden decrease of the constituent quark mass M_f (see Fig. 1, left panel), which also defines the chiral condensate <ff> ∝ M_f. Thus ... the drop in M_f decreases the decay constants of pions and kaons. ..."

    The Mott temperature is defined as the temperature where the hadron binding energy vanishes. In this model the binding energy is made to vanish by an assumed 'sudden switch' drop of the constituent quark masses, and that drop is placed at the pseudocritical temperature Tc=156.5 MeV taken from lattice QCD. Hence the Mott temperature is Tc by construction. The subsequent freeze-out condition (10) is then shown to be satisfied 'at the chiral restoration temperature' only because the quark-mass drop, the resulting radius divergence (17), and the 3-4 order-of-magnitude jump in tau^{-1} have all been inserted at that same Tc.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 3, Eqs. (10)-(17) and Sec. 4]
    "Fig. 3 shows that tau^{-1}_i jumps by 3-4 orders of magnitude, while H_exp behaves smoothly. As a result, the chemical freeze-out condition (10) is fulfilled at the chiral restoration temperature, where the quark mass drops and this drop causes the Mott dissociation of hadrons because of the vanishing of their binding energy. ... A self-consistent solution of the gap equation in a correlated medium would be of interest to obtain consistent results."

    The 'prediction' that chemical freeze-out coincides with the Mott transition is not derived from an independent calculation of the quark mass profile. It is obtained by assuming the sudden-switch mass drop (which the authors state still needs justification) and then using the Povh-Hufner geometric cross section and the Mott radius divergence to make tau^{-1} jump at that drop. Since the input already fixes the chiral restoration temperature and the Mott dissociation temperature to be the same, the numerical coincidence in Eq. (10) is a consequence of the ansatz rather than an independent predictive result.

full rationale

The paper contains a genuine and externally benchmarked thermodynamic calculation: the entropy and pressure at mu_B=0 agree with lattice QCD data (Fig. 2), and the cluster-virial/Phi-derivable framework [8] provides an independent EoS development. Those parts are not circular. The circularity is concentrated in the paper's central application, the claimed 'microscopic justification of the coincidence of chemical freeze-out with Mott dissociation.' The derivation sets the chiral crossover temperature to the lattice value Tc=156.5 MeV, assumes a sudden switch in the constituent quark masses at that temperature (a step the authors explicitly say needs a self-consistent gap-equation solution to justify), and thereby places the Mott dissociation at Tc. The medium-dependent radii then diverge as |T-T_Mott|^{-1/2} (Eq. 17), the geometric cross sections diverge, tau^{-1} jumps by orders of magnitude, and Eq. (10) is satisfied at Tc. In other words, the freeze-out temperature is the temperature at which the input discontinuity was installed; the coincidence is not a measured or independently computed output. This is the pattern of a fitted input being presented as a prediction. The comparison with lattice QCD does not test the freeze-out mechanism, and the assumed sudden-switch profile is not derived from those lattice data. Score 7: the central claim is substantially built in by construction, although the paper contains independent EoS content.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 10 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the generalized Beth-Uhlenbeck cluster expansion from Ref. [8], on the Povh-Hufner and black-disc cross-section laws, on the assumed pion radius divergence near the Mott temperature, and on a sudden-switch quark mass profile placed at the lattice T_c. These are inputs rather than results, so the freeze-out demonstration has a significant free-parameter and assumption load. The lattice comparison at mu_B=0 is external support, but it does not constrain the phase-shift ansatz or the cross-section jump.

free parameters (4)
  • Povh-Hufner cross-section coefficient lambda = 0.197 GeV^2
    Adjusted to zero-temperature hadron reaction data, then used in Eq. (13) for all in-medium hadron-hadron cross sections in the freeze-out calculation.
  • Hubble expansion coefficient a = 2.86
    Empirical coefficient in Eq. (11) H_exp = s^(1/3) / a, taken from Ref. [17]; sets the freeze-out timescale against which reaction rates are compared.
  • Sudden-switch quark mass profile M_f(T) = Step-like drop located at T_c around 156.5 MeV
    The quark masses and their abrupt chiral-restoration drop are assumed, not computed self-consistently; this drop produces the radius and cross-section jump that makes freeze-out coincide with the Mott transition.
  • Phase-shift ansatz parameters (step position, continuum threshold, width)
    The density formula Eq. (5) requires the in-medium phase shifts; the paper uses a schematic step-up plus continuum model (Fig. 1 right) without listing all parameter values, referring to Ref. [8].
assumptions (10)
  • domain assumption Hadrons can be represented as multi-quark clusters described by a generalized Beth-Uhlenbeck phase-shift formula (Eqs. 3-5).
    Taken from the published framework [8]; the paper assumes this cluster decomposition as the starting point rather than deriving it from QCD.
  • domain assumption The Phi-functional is truncated to two-loop 'sunset' diagrams and clusters with at most N=6 quarks.
    Stated in Section 2 as a restriction of the cluster expansion; its numerical convergence is not assessed.
  • domain assumption The 'no sea' approximation removes the divergent vacuum contribution.
    Used to obtain Eq. (5) for the density; standard in effective models but an approximation.
  • domain assumption Quark Pauli blocking and chiral symmetry restoration drive the Mott dissociation of hadrons.
    The physical mechanism linking the chiral condensate drop to hadron dissociation; enters through temperature-dependent quark masses and hadron radii.
  • domain assumption Hadron-hadron cross sections follow the Povh-Hufner geometric law sigma_ij = lambda <r_i^2><r_j^2>.
    Eq. (13) from Refs. [18,19]; assumed to hold in medium.
  • domain assumption Hadron-quark cross sections are estimated by the black-disc approximation sigma_iq = pi <r_i^2>.
    Eq. (14); a rough approximation used in the reaction rate calculation.
  • domain assumption Below T_c the entropy is carried mostly by pions and kaons, so the hadron spectrum for freeze-out is reduced to these species.
    Justified by Fig. 3 left, but restricts the reaction network.
  • domain assumption Chemical freeze-out happens when the Hubble expansion rate equals the reaction rate, H_exp(T_cf) = tau^{-1}(T_cf).
    Eqs. (10)-(12); a reaction-kinetic criterion combined with entropy-conserving expansion.
  • ad hoc to paper The pion radius diverges at the Mott temperature, <r^2>^{1/2} ~ |T - T_Mott|^{-1/2}.
    Eq. (17) taken from Ref. [22]; together with geometric cross sections this divergence produces the reaction-rate jump.
  • ad hoc to paper Sudden switch model for quark masses near T_c.
    Explicitly acknowledged in Section 4 as an assumption to be checked by a self-consistent solution.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Generalized Beth-Uhlenbeck approach to the thermodynamics of quark-hadron matter." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JC7RIG7K

@misc{pith2026250710497,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Generalized Beth-Uhlenbeck approach to the thermodynamics of quark-hadron matter},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JC7RIG7K}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.10497}
}
abstract

We present a unified approach to the transition from hadronic matter to quark matter where hadrons are treated as bound states of quarks which dissociate at high densities due to quark Pauli blocking. The newly developed approach makes use of a cluster virial expansion formulated in terms of a generalized $\Phi$-derivable approach to multi-quark correlations with bound and continuum states in their spectrum encoded in hadron phase shifts. Our model can be used to obtain thermodynamic functions not only at zero and small chemical potentials, where they are consistent with lattice QCD simulations, but also at large chemical potentials where lattice QCD simulations have the sign problem. By applying a reaction-kinetic criterion for the chemical freeze-out of multi-quark clusters in heavy-ion collisions, we demonstrate that the chemical freeze-out coincides with their Mott transition. The approach can be applied to study the effects of the QCD transition on primordial black hole formation in the early Universe and on hybrid neutron star formation in supernova explosions and binary neutron star mergers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.10497 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: Mass spectrum of light and strange quarks used in this work, together with mass and decay width of the Breit-Wigner model for the pion and the nucleon as generic examples for hadrons as a function of temperature for vanishing chemical potential 𝜇/𝑇 = 0. Middle: Temperature dependence of the Polyakov loop absolute value calculated for several values of 𝜇𝐵/𝑇 indicated in the legend. Right: Step-up+continuum mode… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left: Scaled entropy density 𝑠/𝑇 3 as a function of temperature 𝑇 calculated at 𝜇𝐵/𝑇 = 0 (upper panel). Partial contributions of hadrons, quarks, gluons as well as perturbative correction and total 𝑠/𝑇 3 are represented by different curves indicated in figures. The shaded regions correspond to the lattice QCD results [12] in good agreement with the result of the present model (thick solid line). Right: Scaled pressu… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left: Fractions of entropy density carried by different species as a function of temperature 𝑇 calculated at vanishing baryochemical potential. Notably, the red and turquoise solid lines stands for the entropy fractions of quarks and gluons, resp., which are dominant in the QGP phase and strongly suppressed below the Mott transition temperature, because of the effective confinement mechanism in the present work. Rig… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

24 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages

  1. [16]

    Chiral condensate and Mott-Anderson freeze-out

    D. Blaschke, J. Berdermann, J. Cleymans and K. Redlich,Chiral condensate and Mott-Anderson freeze-out,Few Body Syst.53(2012) 99 [1109.5391]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  2. [9]

    HotQCD collaboration,Chiral crossover in QCD at zero and non-zero chemical potentials, Phys. Lett. B795 (2019) 15 [1812.08235]. 8 Generalized Beth-Uhlenbeck approach to the thermodynamics of quark-hadron matterDavid Blaschke

    arXiv 2019

  3. [1]

    Kumar, V

    R. Kumar, V. Dexheimer and J. Jahan,Neutron stars and Constraints for the Equation of State of Dense Matter, in16th Conference on Quark Confinement and the Hadron Spectrum, 3, 2025 [2503.23413]

    arXiv 2025

  4. [2]

    Aarts et al.,Phase Transitions in Particle Physics: Results and Perspectives from Lattice Quantum Chromo-Dynamics, Prog

    G. Aarts et al.,Phase Transitions in Particle Physics: Results and Perspectives from Lattice Quantum Chromo-Dynamics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.133 (2023) 104070 [2301.04382]

    arXiv 2023

  5. [3]

    Sorensen et al.,Dense nuclear matter equation of state from heavy-ion collisions,Prog

    A. Sorensen et al.,Dense nuclear matter equation of state from heavy-ion collisions,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.134(2024) 104080 [2301.13253]

    arXiv 2024

  6. [4]

    Fischer,QCD at finite temperature and chemical potential from Dyson–Schwinger equations,Prog

    C.S. Fischer,QCD at finite temperature and chemical potential from Dyson–Schwinger equations,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.105 (2019) 1 [1810.12938]

    arXiv 2019

  7. [5]

    Dupuis, L

    N. Dupuis, L. Canet, A. Eichhorn, W. Metzner, J.M. Pawlowski, M. Tissier et al.,The nonperturbative functional renormalization group and its applications,Phys. Rept.910 (2021) 1 [2006.04853]

    arXiv 2021

  8. [6]

    Fu,QCD at finite temperature and density within the fRG approach: an overview, Commun

    W.-j. Fu,QCD at finite temperature and density within the fRG approach: an overview, Commun. Theor. Phys.74(2022) 097304 [2205.00468]

    arXiv 2022

Show all 24 references
  1. [7]

    Y.Lu, F.Gao, Y.-x.LiuandJ.M.Pawlowski, Finitedensitysignaturesofconfiningandchiral dynamics in QCD thermodynamics and fluctuations of conserved charges, 2504.05099

    arXiv

  2. [8]

    Blaschke, M

    D. Blaschke, M. Cierniak, O. Ivanytskyi and G. Röpke,Thermodynamics of quark matter with multiquark clusters in an effective Beth-Uhlenbeck type approach,Eur. Phys. J. A60 (2024) 14 [2308.07950]

    2024 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Vanderheyden and G

    B. Vanderheyden and G. Baym,Selfconsistent approximations in relativistic plasmas: Quasiparticle analysis of the thermodynamic properties,J. Statist. Phys.93 (1998) 843 [hep-ph/9803300]

    1998 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Blaizot, E

    J.P. Blaizot, E. Iancu and A. Rebhan,Approximately selfconsistent resummations for the thermodynamics of the quark gluon plasma. 1. Entropy and density,Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 065003 [hep-ph/0005003]

    2001 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Borsányi, Z

    S. Borsányi, Z. Fodor, J.N. Guenther, R. Kara, S.D. Katz, P. Parotto et al.,Lattice QCD equation of state at finite chemical potential from an alternative expansion scheme,Phys. Rev. Lett.126 (2021) 232001 [2102.06660]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Borsanyi, Z

    S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, C. Hoelbling, S.D. Katz, S. Krieg and K.K. Szabo,Full result for the QCD equation of state with 2+1 flavors, Phys. Lett. B730 (2014) 99 [1309.5258]

    2014 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Blaschke, S

    D. Blaschke, S. Liebing, G. Röpke and B. Dönigus,Cluster production and the chemical freeze-out in expanding hot dense matter, Phys. Lett. B860 (2025) 139206 [2408.01399]

    2025 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Andronic, P

    A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich and J. Stachel,Decoding the phase structure of QCD via particle production at high energy, Nature 561 (2018) 321 [1710.09425]

    2018 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Blaschke, J

    D. Blaschke, J. Jankowski and M. Naskret,Formation of hadrons at chemical freeze-out, 1705.00169

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    Povh and J

    B. Povh and J. Hüfner,Systematics of strong interaction radii for hadrons, Phys. Lett. B245 (1990) 653

    1990

  11. [19]

    Hüfner and B

    J. Hüfner and B. Povh,Diffractive elastic scattering and hadronic radii: Geometric and pomeron approaches, Phys. Rev. D46(1992) 990

    1992

  12. [20]

    Martins, D

    K. Martins, D. Blaschke and E. Quack,Quark exchange model for charmonium dissociation in hot hadronic matter, Phys. Rev. C51(1995) 2723 [hep-ph/9411302]

    1995 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Hippe and S.P

    H.J. Hippe and S.P. Klevansky,Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model compared with chiral perturbation theory: The Pion radius in SU(2) revisited,Phys. Rev. C52(1995) 2172

    1995

  14. [22]

    Hüfner, S.P

    J. Hüfner, S.P. Klevansky and P. Rehberg,Soft deconfinement - critical phenomena at the Mott transition in a field theory for quarks and mesons,Nucl. Phys. A606(1996) 260

    1996

  15. [23]

    Gonin, G

    M. Gonin, G. Hasinger, D. Blaschke, O. Ivanytskyi and G. Röpke,Primordial black-hole formation and heavy r-process element synthesis from the cosmological QCD transition. Two aspects of an inhomogeneous early Universe,Eur. Phys. J. A61 (2025) in production [2505.05463]

    2025 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Bastian and D.B

    N.-U.F. Bastian and D.B. Blaschke,A unified quark-nuclear matter equation of state from the cluster virial expansion within the generalized Beth–Uhlenbeck approach,Eur. Phys. J. A57 (2021) 35 [1812.11766]. 9

    2021 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.