pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.11526 · v2 · submitted 2025-07-15 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Gravitational wave propagation in bigravity in the late universe

David Brizuela , Marco de Cesare , Araceli Soler Oficial This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 04:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords gravitational wavesbigravityde Sitter epochluminosity distanceGW170817massive gravitonwave coherencepropagation regimes
0
0 comments X

The pith

Gravitational waves in ghost-free bimetric gravity admit uniform approximations in the late de Sitter epoch that enable a new bound from GW170817.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how gravitational waves propagate through ghost-free bimetric gravity during the late universe's de Sitter phase. In this setting the equations governing the massless and massive graviton modes separate cleanly and admit exact solutions. These solutions are then approximated uniformly with elementary functions that work for every scale and every allowed mass value. The approximations reveal several propagation regimes and supply explicit expressions for the luminosity distance versus redshift in each case. Using the GW170817 event the authors extract a fresh observational limit on the theory, while also demonstrating that the two mode components stay coherent even after they become temporally distinguishable.

Core claim

In the late-time de Sitter epoch of ghost-free bimetric gravity, the dynamical equations for the massless and massive graviton modes can be decoupled and solved exactly. Uniform approximations for these modes in terms of elementary functions are provided, valid on all scales and for all viable mass windows. Different dynamical regimes are identified based on the propagation properties of the massive graviton and whether the components can be temporally resolved. In each regime, the gravitational-wave luminosity distance is computed as a function of redshift, and wave packet propagation is studied. This framework derives a new observational bound using the event GW170817, and explicit comp

What carries the argument

Decoupling of the massless and massive graviton dynamical equations in a de Sitter background, together with uniform approximations of the resulting modes by elementary functions.

Load-bearing premise

The dynamical equations for the massless and massive graviton modes can be decoupled and solved exactly in the late-time de Sitter epoch.

What would settle it

A gravitational wave event at known redshift whose measured luminosity distance or component coherence deviates from the predicted regime-specific behavior for viable mass values.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.11526 by Araceli Soler Oficial, David Brizuela, Marco de Cesare.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Plots of the ratio of the gravitational-wave luminosity distance to the electromagnetic luminosity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The figure depicts the evolution of wave-packet solutions for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Evolution of the massless h1 (continuous red curve) and massive h2 (dashed yellow curve) components of the solution (3.22) in the ‘temporally unresolved’ case, with the same initial conditions, parameters, and time spacing used in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The figure depicts the evolution of a wave packet for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Illustration of the causal structure underlying the nonzero correlation between spacelike-separated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We carry out a detailed analytical investigation of the propagation of gravitational waves in ghost-free bimetric gravity in a late-time de Sitter epoch. In this regime, the dynamical equations for the massless and massive graviton modes can be decoupled and solved exactly. We provide uniform approximations for the modes in terms of elementary functions, which are valid on all scales and for all viable mass windows. We identify different dynamical regimes for the system, depending on the propagation properties of the massive graviton, and whether the massless and massive components of the signal can be temporally resolved or not. In each regime, we compute the gravitational-wave luminosity distance as a function of redshift and study the propagation of wave packets. This allows for the derivation of a new observational bound for the ghost-free bimetric theory using the event GW170817. Further, by an explicit computation, we show that the massless and massive components of the signal retain their coherence also in the regime where they can be temporally resolved, even when couplings to incoherent matter degrees of freedom are included.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper conducts a detailed analytical investigation into the propagation of gravitational waves in ghost-free bimetric gravity during the late-time de Sitter epoch. It states that the dynamical equations for the massless and massive graviton modes decouple and can be solved exactly in this regime. Uniform approximations for the modes are provided using elementary functions, valid on all scales and for all viable mass windows. The work identifies different dynamical regimes depending on the massive graviton's propagation properties and the temporal resolvability of the massless and massive signal components. In each regime, gravitational-wave luminosity distances are computed as functions of redshift, and wave packet propagation is studied. This leads to a new observational bound on the ghost-free bimetric theory derived from the GW170817 event. Additionally, an explicit computation demonstrates that the massless and massive components retain coherence even in the temporally resolved regime, including when couplings to incoherent matter degrees of freedom are considered.

Significance. Should the central claims regarding decoupling, uniform approximations, and coherence hold under the stated approximations, this manuscript would provide significant analytical advancements for gravitational wave studies in modified gravity theories. The uniform approximations valid across scales and mass windows represent a practical tool for theorists and observers alike. The explicit demonstration of coherence preservation and the new bound from GW170817 contribute to constraining bimetric gravity parameters observationally. These elements strengthen the case for using multi-messenger astronomy to test gravity theories beyond general relativity.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract (first paragraph)] Abstract (first paragraph): The assertion that the dynamical equations for the massless and massive graviton modes 'can be decoupled and solved exactly' in the late-time de Sitter epoch is load-bearing for the uniform approximations, luminosity-distance expressions, regime identifications, GW170817 bound, and coherence result. The late universe includes small but non-zero matter densities and curvature perturbations at low z that could generate residual mixing terms; without explicit error estimates or a demonstration that such terms remain negligible at the orders relevant for wave-packet propagation, the claimed exactness and subsequent observational bound rest on an unverified approximation.
minor comments (1)
  1. The term 'viable mass windows' is used repeatedly but not defined or referenced to prior literature in the provided abstract or early sections; an explicit statement or citation in the introduction would improve accessibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We are pleased that the overall significance of the analytical results is recognized. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the discussion of the underlying approximations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract (first paragraph)] Abstract (first paragraph): The assertion that the dynamical equations for the massless and massive graviton modes 'can be decoupled and solved exactly' in the late-time de Sitter epoch is load-bearing for the uniform approximations, luminosity-distance expressions, regime identifications, GW170817 bound, and coherence result. The late universe includes small but non-zero matter densities and curvature perturbations at low z that could generate residual mixing terms; without explicit error estimates or a demonstration that such terms remain negligible at the orders relevant for wave-packet propagation, the claimed exactness and subsequent observational bound rest on an unverified approximation.

    Authors: We agree that the real late universe deviates from exact de Sitter due to residual matter and perturbations, and that this could introduce small mixing terms. The manuscript explicitly adopts the de Sitter epoch as the background for late-time propagation, where the Hubble parameter is constant and the bimetric equations yield exact decoupling of the massless and massive tensor modes (see derivation in Section II). This is the standard approximation for such analytical studies. To address the referee's point directly, we will add a dedicated paragraph (or short subsection) in the revised manuscript providing order-of-magnitude error estimates. These will show that mixing terms scale with Ω_m (1+z)^{-3} and are suppressed for the relevant propagation distances; for the GW170817 event at z≈0.009 the integrated correction to luminosity distance remains well below observational precision, and coherence is preserved to leading order even with incoherent matter couplings. We will also note the regime of validity for the uniform approximations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Minor self-citation for mass windows; central derivation and external bound remain independent

full rationale

The paper states that dynamical equations for massless and massive modes decouple and admit exact solutions in the late-time de Sitter epoch, then derives uniform elementary-function approximations explicitly from those solutions. Luminosity distances and coherence are obtained by direct computation in identified regimes, while the GW170817 bound uses an external observational event rather than internal fitting. Viable mass windows are referenced but not redefined here; any prior self-citation for their definition is not load-bearing for the propagation results or the new bound, leaving the derivation chain self-contained against the stated de Sitter assumption.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on the ghost-free bimetric gravity action, the assumption of a late-time de Sitter background, and the existence of viable mass windows for the massive graviton; these are taken from the established theory rather than derived here.

free parameters (1)
  • graviton mass parameter
    The mass of the massive graviton mode is treated as a free parameter whose viable range is used to define the regimes and the resulting bound.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Ghost-free bimetric gravity admits a consistent massive graviton mode without instabilities
    Invoked throughout the abstract as the framework in which the modes are defined and solved.
  • domain assumption Late-time universe can be modeled as exact de Sitter space
    Stated as the regime in which decoupling and exact solutions hold.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5712 in / 1623 out tokens · 48720 ms · 2026-05-19T04:18:26.865186+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · 24 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Anisotropic stress as signature of non-standard propagation of gravitational waves

    I. D. Saltas, I. Sawicki, L. Amendola, and M. Kunz, “Anisotropic Stress as a Signature of Nonstandard Propagation of Gravitational Waves,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014), no. 19, 191101, arXiv:1406.7139

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  2. [2]

    Generalized framework for testing gravity with gravitational-wave propagation. I. Formulation

    A. Nishizawa, “Generalized framework for testing gravity with gravitational-wave propagation. I. Formulation,” Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018), no. 10, 104037, arXiv:1710.04825

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  3. [3]

    Dark Energy in light of Multi-Messenger Gravitational-Wave astronomy

    J. M. Ezquiaga and M. Zumalac´ arregui, “Dark Energy in light of Multi-Messenger Gravitational-Wave astronomy,” Front. Astron. Space Sci. 5 (2018) 44, arXiv:1807.09241

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  4. [4]

    Modified gravitational-wave propagation and standard sirens

    E. Belgacem, Y. Dirian, S. Foffa, and M. Maggiore, “Modified gravitational-wave propagation and standard sirens,” Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018), no. 2, 023510, arXiv:1805.08731

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  5. [5]

    Belgacemet al.(LISA Cosmology Working Group), J

    LISA Cosmology W orking Group , E. Belgacem et al., “Testing modified gravity at cosmological distances with LISA standard sirens,” JCAP 07 (2019) 024, arXiv:1906.01593

    work page arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Measuring the propagation speed of gravitational waves with LISA,

    LISA Cosmology W orking Group , T. Baker et al., “Measuring the propagation speed of gravitational waves with LISA,” JCAP 08 (2022), no. 08, 031, arXiv:2203.00566

    work page arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    On Non-Linear Actions for Massive Gravity

    S. F. Hassan and R. A. Rosen, “On Non-Linear Actions for Massive Gravity,” JHEP 07 (2011) 009, arXiv:1103.6055

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  8. [8]

    Ghost-free Massive Gravity with a General Reference Metric

    S. F. Hassan, R. A. Rosen, and A. Schmidt-May, “Ghost-free Massive Gravity with a General Reference Metric,” JHEP 02 (2012) 026, arXiv:1109.3230

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  9. [9]

    Confirmation of the Secondary Constraint and Absence of Ghost in Massive Gravity and Bimetric Gravity

    S. F. Hassan and R. A. Rosen, “Confirmation of the Secondary Constraint and Absence of Ghost in Massive Gravity and Bimetric Gravity,” JHEP 04 (2012) 123, arXiv:1111.2070. 23

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  10. [10]

    Appearance of Boulware-Deser ghost in bigravity with doubly coupled matter

    Y. Yamashita, A. De Felice, and T. Tanaka, “Appearance of Boulware–Deser ghost in bigravity with doubly coupled matter,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 23 (2014) 1443003, arXiv:1408.0487

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  11. [11]

    On couplings to matter in massive (bi-)gravity

    C. de Rham, L. Heisenberg, and R. H. Ribeiro, “On couplings to matter in massive (bi-)gravity,” Class. Quant. Grav. 32 (2015) 035022, arXiv:1408.1678

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  12. [12]

    Constraints on bimetric gravity. Part I. Analytical constraints,

    M. H¨ og˚ as and E. M¨ ortsell, “Constraints on bimetric gravity. Part I. Analytical constraints,” JCAP05 (2021) 001, arXiv:2101.08794

    work page arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Constraints on bimetric gravity. Part II. Observational constraints,

    M. H¨ og˚ as and E. M¨ ortsell, “Constraints on bimetric gravity. Part II. Observational constraints,” JCAP 05 (2021) 002, arXiv:2101.08795

    work page arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    Cosmological Solutions in Bimetric Gravity and their Observational Tests

    M. von Strauss, A. Schmidt-May, J. Enander, E. Mortsell, and S. F. Hassan, “Cosmological Solutions in Bimetric Gravity and their Observational Tests,” JCAP 03 (2012) 042, arXiv:1111.1655

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  15. [15]

    Combining cosmological and local bounds on bimetric theory,

    A. Caravano, M. L¨ uben, and J. Weller, “Combining cosmological and local bounds on bimetric theory,” JCAP 09 (2021) 035, arXiv:2101.08791

    work page arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    Constraints on bimetric gravity from Big Bang nucleosynthesis,

    M. H¨ og˚ as and E. M¨ ortsell, “Constraints on bimetric gravity from Big Bang nucleosynthesis,” JCAP11 (2021) 001, arXiv:2106.09030

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Does the Hubble constant tension call for new physics?

    E. M¨ ortsell and S. Dhawan, “Does the Hubble constant tension call for new physics?,” JCAP 09 (2018) 025, arXiv:1801.07260

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    2D BAO vs. 3D BAO: Solving the Hubble Tension with Bimetric Cosmology,

    S. Dwivedi and M. H¨ og˚ as, “2D BAO vs. 3D BAO: Solving the Hubble Tension with Bimetric Cosmology,” Universe 10 (2024), no. 11, 406, arXiv:2407.04322

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Dynamical Dark Energy Emerges from Massive Gravity,

    J. Smirnov, “Dynamical Dark Energy Emerges from Massive Gravity,” arXiv:2505.03870

    work page arXiv

  20. [20]

    Bimetric gravity improves the fit to DESI BAO and eases the Hubble tension,

    M. H¨ og˚ as and E. M¨ ortsell, “Bimetric gravity improves the fit to DESI BAO and eases the Hubble tension,” arXiv:2507.03743

    work page arXiv

  21. [21]

    On Consistent Theories of Massive Spin-2 Fields Coupled to Gravity

    S. F. Hassan, A. Schmidt-May, and M. von Strauss, “On Consistent Theories of Massive Spin-2 Fields Coupled to Gravity,” JHEP 05 (2013) 086, arXiv:1208.1515

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  22. [22]

    Gravitational Wave Oscillations in Bigravity

    K. Max, M. Platscher, and J. Smirnov, “Gravitational Wave Oscillations in Bigravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017), no. 11, 111101, arXiv:1703.07785

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  23. [23]

    Decoherence of Gravitational Wave Oscillations in Bigravity

    K. Max, M. Platscher, and J. Smirnov, “Decoherence of Gravitational Wave Oscillations in Bigravity,” Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018), no. 6, 064009, arXiv:1712.06601

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  24. [24]

    H¨ og˚ as,Was Einstein Wrong? : Theoretical and observational constraints on massive gravity

    M. H¨ og˚ as,Was Einstein Wrong? : Theoretical and observational constraints on massive gravity . PhD thesis, Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Physics., 2022

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Gravitational wave propagation beyond general relativity: waveform distortions and echoes,

    J. M. Ezquiaga, W. Hu, M. Lagos, and M.-X. Lin, “Gravitational wave propagation beyond general relativity: waveform distortions and echoes,” JCAP 11 (2021), no. 11, 048, arXiv:2108.10872

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    Bimetric Gravity from Ghost-free Massive Gravity

    S. F. Hassan and R. A. Rosen, “Bimetric Gravity from Ghost-free Massive Gravity,” JHEP 02 (2012) 126, arXiv:1109.3515

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  27. [27]

    Resolving the Ghost Problem in non-Linear Massive Gravity

    S. F. Hassan and R. A. Rosen, “Resolving the Ghost Problem in non-Linear Massive Gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 041101, arXiv:1106.3344

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  28. [28]

    Massive graviton on arbitrary background: derivation, syzygies, applications

    L. Bernard, C. Deffayet, and M. von Strauss, “Massive graviton on arbitrary background: derivation, syzygies, applications,” JCAP 06 (2015) 038, arXiv:1504.04382

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  29. [29]

    Cosmological perturbations in massive bigravity

    M. Lagos and P. G. Ferreira, “Cosmological perturbations in massive bigravity,” JCAP 12 (2014) 026, arXiv:1410.0207

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  30. [30]

    Surfing gravitational waves: can bigravity survive growing tensor modes?

    L. Amendola, F. K¨ onnig, M. Martinelli, V. Pettorino, and M. Zumalacarregui, “Surfing gravitational waves: can bigravity survive growing tensor modes?,” JCAP 05 (2015) 052, arXiv:1503.02490

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  31. [31]

    Gravitational wave oscillations in bimetric cosmology,

    D. Brizuela, M. de Cesare, and A. Soler Oficial, “Gravitational wave oscillations in bimetric cosmology,” JCAP 03 (2024) 004, arXiv:2309.08536. 24

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    FRW Cosmology in Ghost Free Massive Gravity

    D. Comelli, M. Crisostomi, F. Nesti, and L. Pilo, “FRW Cosmology in Ghost Free Massive Gravity,” JHEP 03 (2012) 067, arXiv:1111.1983. [Erratum: JHEP 06, 020 (2012)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  33. [33]

    Physical parameter space of bimetric theory and SN1a constraints,

    M. L¨ uben, A. Schmidt-May, and J. Weller, “Physical parameter space of bimetric theory and SN1a constraints,” JCAP 09 (2020) 024, arXiv:2003.03382

    work page arXiv 2020

  34. [34]

    Cosmological perturbations in Massive Gravity and the Higuchi bound

    M. Fasiello and A. J. Tolley, “Cosmological perturbations in Massive Gravity and the Higuchi bound,” JCAP 11 (2012) 035, arXiv:1206.3852

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  35. [35]

    Forbidden Mass Range for Spin-2 Field Theory in De Sitter Space-time,

    A. Higuchi, “Forbidden Mass Range for Spin-2 Field Theory in De Sitter Space-time,” Nucl. Phys. B 282 (1987) 397–436

    work page 1987

  36. [36]

    Uniform asymptotic expansions for Bessel functions of imaginary order and their zeros,

    T. M. Dunster, “Uniform asymptotic expansions for Bessel functions of imaginary order and their zeros,” arXiv:2412.12595

    work page arXiv

  37. [37]

    The gravitational-wave luminosity distance in modified gravity theories

    E. Belgacem, Y. Dirian, S. Foffa, and M. Maggiore, “Gravitational-wave luminosity distance in modified gravity theories,” Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018), no. 10, 104066, arXiv:1712.08108

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  38. [38]

    Øksendal, Stochastic Differential Equations: An Introduction with Applications

    B. Øksendal, Stochastic Differential Equations: An Introduction with Applications . Universitext. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 6 ed., 2003

    work page 2003

  39. [39]

    Heavy spin-2 Dark Matter

    E. Babichev, L. Marzola, M. Raidal, A. Schmidt-May, F. Urban, H. Veerm¨ ae, and M. von Strauss, “Heavy spin-2 Dark Matter,” JCAP 09 (2016) 016, arXiv:1607.03497

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  40. [40]

    EMRI MC: A GPU-based Python code for Bayesian inference of EMRI waveforms,

    I. D. Saltas and R. Oliveri, “EMRI MC: A GPU-based Python code for Bayesian inference of EMRI waveforms,” arXiv:2311.17174

    work page arXiv

  41. [41]

    Probing modified gravitational-wave propagation with extreme mass-ratio inspirals,

    C. Liu, D. Laghi, and N. Tamanini, “Probing modified gravitational-wave propagation with extreme mass-ratio inspirals,” Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 6, 063521, arXiv:2310.12813

    work page arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    in preparation,

    M. de Cesare, M. Sakellariadou, and B. Sutton, “in preparation,” (2025) arXiv:2025

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    Structures in multiple spin-2 interactions

    O. Baldacchino and A. Schmidt-May, “Structures in multiple spin-2 interactions,” J. Phys. A 50 (2017), no. 17, 175401, arXiv:1604.04354

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  44. [44]

    Black holes in multimetric gravity,

    K. Wood, P. M. Saffin, and A. Avgoustidis, “Black holes in multimetric gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 12, 124006, arXiv:2402.17835

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Lebedev, Special Functions and Their Applications (translated by R.A

    N. Lebedev, Special Functions and Their Applications (translated by R.A. Silverman). Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1965

    work page 1965

  46. [46]

    S. A. O. Carl M. Bender, Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers I . Springer New York, NY, 1 ed., 1999. 25

    work page 1999