Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 66 references

Discrete solitons in Rydberg atom chains

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The PXP model hosts discrete solitons that move without spreading on top of reviving scarred states.

desk verdict Genuinely new chiral defect dynamics on PXP scars, well supported numerically; the 'soliton' label and the classical TDVP section overreach. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.13196 v1 pith:UBVQ5TYP submitted 2025-07-17 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-el

Aron Kerschbaumer , Jean-Yves Desaules , Marko Ljubotina , Maksym Serbyn This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-el PACS 05.45.Yv03.65.-w
keywords discretesolitonsPXPmodelRydbergatomchainsquantummany-bodyscarsnon-ergodicdynamicstime-dependentvariationalprincipleenergytransportinformationtransfer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish that the PXP model, an effective description of Rydberg atom chains under strong nearest-neighbor blockade, supports localized, directionally moving wave packets in its high-energy spectrum. These solitonic excitations are constructed as small defects on a special scarred initial state and travel one unit cell per revival period, carrying energy and preserving coherence for many periods. If correct, this adds a new class of non-ergodic quantum dynamics beyond the known reviving states and offers a concrete route to directed energy and quantum information transport in Rydberg simulators. The authors also identify a classical counterpart of these solitons in the nonlinear equations obtained by projecting the quantum dynamics onto a variational manifold.

What carries the argument

The central object is the three-site unit cell |S⟩ of the scarred initial state |K⟩, together with the chiral-symmetry-related defect cells |L⟩ and |R⟩ defined in Eq. (4). The |R⟩ cell has squared overlap 0.98 with the unit cell of the time-evolved scarred state at quarter-period |K(T/4)⟩, so inserting it amounts to phase-shifting one cell by a quarter period, which naturally leads to a displacement of one cell per full period. This 'quarter-period phase-shift' mechanism explains why the defect moves coherently and why the energy-carrying superposition |Rα⟩ inherits the same translational dynamics. The supporting analysis uses translation fidelities F_m(t) to quantify coherent displacement, and the time-dependent variational principle over the matrix product state manifold to derive the classical equations of motion (Eq. 9).

What would settle it

Prepare the scarred state |K⟩ with a single |R⟩ defect at a known position in a Rydberg chain and measure the number-operator difference ⟨n_i(t)⟩_Δ. If the defect does not produce a pronounced rightward-moving peak at the expected velocity v_sol = 3/T ≈ 0.85 Ω, or if the translation fidelity F_m(t) fails to show a peak at t = mT for m = 1, the central claim of coherent directional propagation would be contradicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that inserting the three-site defect cell |R⟩ (or its chiral partner |L⟩) into the scarred background state |K⟩ produces a wave packet that translates coherently by one unit cell per revival period T ≈ 3.52, with the same phenomenology for energy-carrying superpositions |Rα⟩ = cos α |R⟩ + sin α |S⟩. The propagation is directional, persists for several periods (translation fidelity ≈ 30% after four steps in a 30-site system), and is accompanied by directed transport of energy density. The authors demonstrate that these solitons are not weak perturbations of the scarred state—the defect cells are orthogonal to |S⟩—and that their stability degrades only weakly with the number of inserted solitons, with additional decay from collisions between counter-propagating solitons. They further show that a Bell pair of opposite-moving solitons produces long-range entanglement and a measurable energy-density correlation signal, and that a variational projection of the dynamics onto a bond-dimension-2 matrix product state manifold yields a classical nonlinear system exhibiting qualitatively similar solitons.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the bond-dimension-2 matrix product state ansatz and the derived classical equations of motion faithfully represent the solitonic dynamics; the paper itself shows that the natural quantum soliton cell decays rapidly in the variational dynamics, so the classical-quantum correspondence holds only for specially optimized angles, and if those angles are not representative the semiclassical part of the claim would weaken even if the quantum numerics stand.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If solitons exist as claimed, they provide a mechanism for directed energy transport through the PXP model, potentially explaining the superdiffusive energy transport reported in Rydberg arrays.
  • The Bell-pair construction shows that two oppositely moving solitons can create long-range entanglement and transfer quantum information across the chain without site-dependent couplings, making it directly implementable in current Rydberg simulators.
  • Multi-soliton states form an exponentially large manifold of non-thermal states whose decay rate grows roughly in proportion to the number of solitons, indicating a family of non-ergodic high-energy states beyond the known scarred revivals.
  • The classical TDVP equations host soliton-like solutions with approximately closed periodic trajectories in the variational angles, opening a route to studying soliton scattering and stability in a classical nonlinear system that mimics the quantum dynamics.
  • The phenomenon is not unique to the PXP model: solitonic behavior appears in the PPXPP model with a five-site unit cell, suggesting the mechanism generalizes to longer-range blockade Hamiltonians.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the quarter-period phase-shift mechanism is generic, solitons may be present in other scarred lattice models—such as the spin-1 XY model or higher-spin kinetically constrained chains—wherever a scarred trajectory has a unit cell shifted by a quarter period that still obeys the constraint.
  • A natural stabilizing route, left implicit in the paper, is to deform the PXP Hamiltonian or add periodic driving to make the soliton translation fidelity approach unity; the paper mentions such deformations as a future direction for storing and transmitting information.
  • A direct experimental test would be to measure the connected energy-density correlation function ⟨X_{−i−1}X_i⟩_c in a Bell-pair quench; the predicted straight-line maximum at slope 1/v_sol provides a sharp observable signature that could be checked in current-generation Rydberg atom arrays.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper claims to demonstrate discrete solitons in the PXP model describing Rydberg atom chains. The authors construct a right-moving (|R⟩) and left-moving (|L⟩) three-site defect cell on top of the scarred state |K⟩, built from |S⟩ cells, and show via TEBD simulations that these defects translate coherently by one unit cell per revival period T. They further introduce energy-carrying superpositions |R_α⟩, |L_α⟩, study multi-soliton states and collisions, demonstrate long-range entanglement transfer for a Bell pair of solitons, and derive a classical nonlinear system via TDVP on a bond-dimension-2 MPS manifold, in which they search for and find soliton-like solutions by numerical optimization.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is a genuinely new class of non-ergodic dynamics: localized, directionally moving excitations on top of quantum many-body scar states, with an internal energy degree of freedom that may be relevant for the anomalous energy transport in PXP models. The numerical work is careful: TEBD convergence is checked against χ=128, local observables are taken away from boundaries, and the TDVP equations are independently cross-checked against Ref. [34]. The construction of |R⟩ is non-circular, following from orthonormality and chiral-symmetry conditions, and the phenomenology is verified by simulation rather than assumed. The paper is likely to be of interest to the quantum-simulation and many-body dynamics communities.

major comments (2)
  1. [Soliton excitations; Fig. 1; Eq. (7) and surrounding text] The central claim that these excitations are solitonic—localized wave packets that travel without spreading—is not supported by the quantitative evidence presented. The translation fidelity F_m(t) decays with m: for a single |R⟩ soliton, F_4 ≈ 0.30 at t = 4T, and for the four-soliton state in Fig. 2a the fidelity drops to about 1% by m = 4. No direct measure of the wave-packet width or its time dependence is provided, and no finite-size scaling or extrapolation of the decay rate toward the thermodynamic limit is given. Without such analysis, the data are consistent with a chiral, finite-time transient on a scarred background rather than a persistent non-spreading excitation. The abstract's first sentence defines solitons as traveling without spreading, yet the paper's own terminology ('quasi-solitons', 'approximately coherent propagation') concedes a weaker property. Please either provide a quantitative width/spreading analysis with system-size scaling, or temper the central claim to what the numerics actually show.
  2. [Variational description; SM Sec. S2B and Fig. S9] The claimed classical counterpart of the quantum solitons is not established by the presented evidence. Under the TDVP equations derived from the bond-dimension-2 MPS ansatz, the natural quantum soliton cells |R⟩ and |L⟩ embedded in the |S⟩ background decay rapidly and spread incoherently (SM Fig. S9b). The stable classical solitons are obtained only after numerical optimization of the angles θ^S and θ^R using loss functions with empirically chosen penalty cutoffs d_c and D_c (SM Eqs. S7–S13). Thus the classical solitons do not appear to be the images of the quantum solitons under the variational projection; instead they are separately tuned solutions of the classical equations. This weakens the abstract's and main text's claim of identifying 'their counterpart in a classical nonlinear dynamical system.' Please clarify what the classical calculation adds beyond showing that the variational equations can be made to host localized solutions for specially optimized parameters, and state explicitly that the quantum-classical correspondence is only qualitative.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction and abstract] The abstract states 'solitonic excitations' without the qualifier 'quasi' that appears in the introduction; please align the abstract with the caveat of approximate coherence.
  2. [Methods, Eq. (10)] The translation fidelity used in Figs. 1–4 is a subsystem fidelity with region A specified in figure captions only partially; the main text refers to 'translation fidelity' without consistently noting the dependence on the chosen subsystem A. Please state this explicitly where F_m is first discussed.
  3. [Fig. 1d and Eq. (4)] The overlap of the state |R⟩ with the |K(T/4)⟩ cell is quoted as 0.98, but no corresponding value for the |L⟩ overlap at 3T/4 is given; please provide it for completeness.
  4. [Soliton stability and collisions] The statement that 'the smallest peak in fidelity revivals is only about 1% for the four-soliton state, this is still a very large fidelity for a region of 60 sites' would be better supported by a comparison to the fidelity expected for a random or thermal state, which is exponentially small.
  5. [Eq. (9)] The notation ⟨n_N⟩/⟨n_1⟩ in Eq. (9) is clear only after reading the Methods definition in Eq. (14); consider defining ⟨n_i⟩ when Eq. (9) is first presented.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Classical TDVP solitons are optimized into existence via a loss functional that encodes solitonic translation, while the central quantum soliton claim rests on independent TEBD verification.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Main text, 'Variational description' and SM S2 A 'Numerical optimization of angles']
    "We defined a total loss functional operating on θ(t), L, that contains two parts, L = Lclosed + Lshifted. The first part measures how well the trajectory returns to its initial state after the soliton has traveled one full period through the chain and the second part measures how accurately all angles have shifted by 3 sites to the right after one scar revival period."

    The classical soliton is not predicted from the TDVP equations; instead, the angles θS and θR are selected by minimizing a loss function whose terms explicitly demand (i) return to the initial angles after the defect travels through the chain and (ii) a 3-site right shift of all angles after one revival period. These are precisely the solitonic properties later reported as 'coherent propagation' and quantified by translation fidelities. The paper also concedes that the natural quantum soliton cells |R>,|L> decay rapidly under the same TDVP dynamics (SM Fig. S9b), so the classical counterpart exists only after this fitting. Thus the 'counterpart in a classical nonlinear dynamical system' is constructed by the optimization objective rather than derived from first principles.

full rationale

The central quantum claim is self-contained and not circular: the defect cells |L,R> are fixed by orthonormality and chiral symmetry (Eq. 4), not by demanding solitonic propagation, and the directed motion is verified by TEBD with explicit bond-dimension convergence checks. The scarred background |K> is taken from prior work but is an externally studied input, and the TDVP equations of motion are cross-checked against the independent derivation of Ref. [34]. The one genuine circular step is the classical section, where the TDVP soliton angles are obtained by numerically optimizing a loss functional that literally encodes the soliton behavior (periodic return, 3-site shift), and those same optimized angles are then exhibited as evidence of classical solitons. This is a fitted construction rather than a falsifiable prediction, but it is peripheral to the main quantum observation and is transparently disclosed by the authors. Overall circularity is therefore partial, not a collapse of the main result.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The soliton cells |L> and |R> are states in the existing Hilbert space, and the classical equations are derived from the same quantum model. The free parameters are the hand-picked beta and the numerically optimized TDVP angles needed to make the classical solitons stable.

free parameters (4)
  • beta = 0.65
    Chosen value from earlier scar literature; defines |S>, |L>, |R> and all soliton states. Not fitted in this paper but hand-picked and load-bearing for the construction.
  • theta_S_1..3 = (1.05977133, 1.46820419, 0.0000131027276)
    Numerically optimized TDVP scarred cell angles, obtained by minimizing a loss functional that rewards coherent translation.
  • theta_R_1..3 = (0.990853599, 0.454003269, 3.10125177)
    Numerically optimized TDVP right-moving soliton angles, fitted to produce solitonic dynamics in the classical equations.
  • Penalty cutoffs d_c and D_c = 0.4 and 0.7
    Empirically chosen cutoffs in the loss penalties Pclosed and Pshifted; not derived from theory, chosen to make optimization yield solitonic dynamics.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The PXP Hamiltonian (Eq. 1) accurately models the Rydberg atom chain in the nearest-neighbor blockade regime.
    Used to connect theory to Rydberg simulators; PXP is an approximation to the full Rydberg Hamiltonian including van der Waals interactions.
  • domain assumption The rank-2 MPS ansatz (Eq. 11) lies on a manifold that captures scarred and solitonic dynamics.
    Underpins the TDVP derivation; the paper shows it does not fully capture the natural soliton (Fig. S9b), so this assumption is partially violated.
  • ad hoc to paper The conjectured general form of the TDVP equations (Eqs. 12, 13) holds for arbitrary unit cell size.
    Derived explicitly for N=1 to 4 and conjectured for general N; independently matched to Ref. [34], which strengthens but does not prove it.
  • standard math Chiral symmetry C and spatial inversion I generate the left-moving soliton from the right-moving one.
    Uses Eq. (2) and commutation with H to relate left and right propagation; this is a rigorous symmetry of the PXP model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Discrete solitons in Rydberg atom chains." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UBVQ5TYP

@misc{pith2026250713196,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Discrete solitons in Rydberg atom chains},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UBVQ5TYP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.13196}
}
read the original abstract

Solitons - localized wave packets that travel without spreading - play a central role in understanding transport and properties of nonlinear systems, from optical fibers to fluid dynamics. In quantum many-body systems, however, such robust excitations are typically destroyed by thermalization. Here, we theoretically demonstrate the existence of solitonic excitations in high-energy states of Rydberg atom chains in the regime of strong nearest-neighbor Rydberg blockade. These localized wave packets propagate directionally atop a special class of reviving initial states related to quantum many-body scars and are capable of carrying energy. Exhibiting long coherence times, these states constitute a novel type of non-ergodic quantum dynamics and can be efficiently implemented on Rydberg atom simulators. In addition to a phenomenological description of solitons, we identify their counterpart in a classical nonlinear dynamical system obtained from a variational projection of the quantum dynamics. We demonstrate the potential use of solitons in quantum information transfer and conjecture their relevance for the anomalous energy transport reported in numerical studies of Rydberg atom arrays.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.13196 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Dynamics of a single right-moving soliton initialized in the scarred state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Decay of initial multi-soliton states under unitary dynamics. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Unitary dynamics of energy-carrying soliton states. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Time evolution of classical equations of motion ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [34]

    Variational method for $\mathbb{Z}_K$ wavefunctions in spin-$J$ PXP model

    Z. Hu and B. Wu, Variational method for ZK wave- functions in spin- J PXP model, arXiv ePrints (2025), arXiv:2501.09301 [quant-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  2. [1]

    J. H. V. Nguyen, P. Dyke, D. Luo, B. A. Malomed, and R. G. Hulet, Collisions of matter-wave solitons, Nature Physics 10, 918 (2014)

    2014

  3. [2]

    C. P. Grams, D. Br¨ uning, S. Kopatz, T. Lorenz, P. Becker, L. Bohat´ y, and J. Hemberger, Observation of chiral solitons in LiCuVO4, Communications Physics 5, 37 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [3]

    A. V. Ustinov, T. Doderer, R. P. Huebener, N. F. Ped- ersen, B. Mayer, and V. A. Oboznov, Dynamics of Sine- Gordon solitons in the annular Josephson junction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1815 (1992)

    work page 1992

  5. [4]

    Lederer, G

    F. Lederer, G. I. Stegeman, D. N. Christodoulides, G. As- santo, M. Segev, and Y. Silberberg, Discrete solitons in optics, Physics Reports 463, 1 (2008)

    2008

  6. [5]

    Zabrodin, Classical facets of quantum integrability, arXiv ePrints (2025), arXiv:2501.18557 [math-ph]

    A. Zabrodin, Classical facets of quantum integrability, arXiv ePrints (2025), arXiv:2501.18557 [math-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  7. [6]

    Vlijm, M

    R. Vlijm, M. Ganahl, D. Fioretto, M. Brockmann, M. Haque, H. G. Evertz, and J.-S. Caux, Quasi-soliton scattering in quantum spin chains, Physical Review B92, 214427 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [7]

    Fukuhara, P

    T. Fukuhara, P. Schauß, M. Endres, S. Hild, M. Che- neau, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Microscopic observation of magnon bound states and their dynamics, Nature 502, 76 (2013)

    work page 2013

Show all 66 references
  1. [8]

    Fendley, K

    P. Fendley, K. Sengupta, and S. Sachdev, Competing density-wave orders in a one-dimensional hard-boson model, Phys. Rev. B 69, 075106 (2004)

    2004

  2. [9]

    Lesanovsky and H

    I. Lesanovsky and H. Katsura, Interacting Fibonacci anyons in a Rydberg gas, Phys. Rev. A 86, 041601(R) (2012)

    2012

  3. [10]

    Browaeys and T

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms, Nature Physics 16, 10.1038/s41567-019-0733-z (2020)

    2020 doi

  4. [11]

    Bernien, S

    H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Om- ran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, et al. , Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature 551, 579 (2017)

    2017

  5. [12]

    Bluvstein, A

    D. Bluvstein, A. Omran, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Se- meghini, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, A. A. Michailidis, N. Maskara, W. W. Ho, et al. , Controlling quantum many-body dynamics in driven Rydberg atom arrays, Science 371, 1355 (2021)

    2021

  6. [13]

    C. J. Turner, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, M. Serbyn, and Z. Papi´ c, Weak ergodicity breaking from quantum many-body scars, Nature Physics 14, 745 (2018)

    2018

  7. [14]

    S. Choi, C. J. Turner, H. Pichler, W. W. Ho, A. A. Michailidis, Z. Papi´ c, M. Serbyn, M. D. Lukin, and D. A. Abanin, Emergent SU(2) dynamics and perfect quantum many-body scars, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 220603 (2019). 9

    2019

  8. [15]

    Ljubotina, J.-Y

    M. Ljubotina, J.-Y. Desaules, M. Serbyn, and Z. Papi´ c, Superdiffusive energy transport in kinetically constrained models, Phys. Rev. X 13, 011033 (2023)

    2023

  9. [16]

    Haegeman, J

    J. Haegeman, J. I. Cirac, T. J. Osborne, I. Piˇ zorn, H. Ver- schelde, and F. Verstraete, Time-Dependent Variational Principle for Quantum Lattices, Physical Review Letters 107, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.070601 (2011)

    2011 doi

  10. [17]

    Haegeman, C

    J. Haegeman, C. Lubich, I. Oseledets, B. Vandereycken, and F. Verstraete, Unifying time evolution and optimiza- tion with matrix product states, Physical Review B 94, 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.165116 (2016)

    2016 doi

  11. [18]

    Supplementary Online Material

  12. [19]

    Serbyn, D

    M. Serbyn, D. A. Abanin, and Z. Papi´ c, Quantum many- body scars and weak breaking of ergodicity, Nature Physics 17, 675 (2021)

    2021

  13. [20]

    Moudgalya, B

    S. Moudgalya, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Quan- tum many-body scars and Hilbert space fragmentation: A review of exact results, Reports on Progress in Physics 85, 086501 (2022)

    2022

  14. [21]

    Chandran, T

    A. Chandran, T. Iadecola, V. Khemani, and R. Moess- ner, Quantum many-body scars: A quasiparticle perspec- tive, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 14, 443 (2023)

    2023

  15. [22]

    C. J. Turner, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, M. Serbyn, and Z. Papi´ c, Quantum scarred eigenstates in a Rydberg atom chain: Entanglement, breakdown of thermalization, and stability to perturbations, Phys. Rev. B 98, 155134 (2018)

    2018

  16. [23]

    Khemani, C

    V. Khemani, C. R. Laumann, and A. Chandran, Sig- natures of integrability in the dynamics of Rydberg- blockaded chains, Phys. Rev. B 99, 161101 (2019)

    2019

  17. [24]

    H. K. Park and S. Lee, Graph-theoretical proof of nonin- tegrability in quantum many-body systems: Application to the PXP model, Phys. Rev. B 111, L081101 (2025)

    2025

  18. [25]

    Maskara, A

    N. Maskara, A. A. Michailidis, W. W. Ho, D. Bluvstein, S. Choi, M. D. Lukin, and M. Serbyn, Discrete time- crystalline order enabled by quantum many-body scars: Entanglement steering via periodic driving, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 090602 (2021)

    2021

  19. [26]

    W. W. Ho, S. Choi, H. Pichler, and M. D. Lukin, Pe- riodic orbits, entanglement, and quantum many-body scars in constrained models: Matrix product state ap- proach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 040603 (2019)

    2019

  20. [27]

    A. A. Michailidis, C. J. Turner, Z. Papi´ c, D. A. Abanin, and M. Serbyn, Slow quantum thermalization and many- body revivals from mixed phase space, Phys. Rev. X 10, 011055 (2020)

    2020

  21. [28]

    F. M. Surace, P. P. Mazza, G. Giudici, A. Lerose, A. Gambassi, and M. Dalmonte, Lattice gauge theories and string dynamics in Rydberg atom quantum simula- tors, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021041 (2020)

    2020

  22. [29]

    G. Chen, W. Huang, and Y. Yao, Dynamics of entangled domain walls in the PXP model under driving: Crossover from prethermalization to localization, Physical Review B 106, 174302 (2022)

    2022

  23. [30]

    Desaules, G.-X

    J.-Y. Desaules, G.-X. Su, I. P. McCulloch, B. Yang, Z. Papi´ c, and J. C. Halimeh, Ergodicity breaking under confinement in cold-atom quantum simulators, Quantum 8, 1274 (2024)

    2024

  24. [31]

    G.-X. Su, J. J. Osborne, and J. C. Halimeh, Cold-atom particle collider, PRX Quantum 5, 040310 (2024)

    2024

  25. [32]

    Kerschbaumer, M

    A. Kerschbaumer, M. Ljubotina, M. Serbyn, and J.-Y. Desaules, Quantum many-body scars beyond the PXP model in Rydberg simulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 160401 (2025)

    2025

  26. [33]

    Dooley, L

    S. Dooley, L. Johnston, P. Gormley, and B. Camp- bell, Perfect quantum state transfer through a chaotic spin chain via many-body scars, arXiv ePrints (2025), arXiv:2506.22114 [quant-ph]

    2025

  27. [35]

    Giudici, F

    G. Giudici, F. M. Surace, and H. Pichler, Unraveling pxp many-body scars through floquet dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 190404 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    J. W. P. Wilkinson, K. Klobas, T. Prosen, and J. P. Gar- rahan, Exact solution of the Floquet-PXP cellular au- tomaton, Phys. Rev. E 102, 062107 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Kormos, M

    M. Kormos, M. Collura, G. Tak´ acs, and P. Calabrese, Real-time confinement following a quantum quench to a non-integrable model, Nature Physics 13, 246 (2017)

    2017

  30. [38]

    Schecter and T

    M. Schecter and T. Iadecola, Weak ergodicity breaking and quantum many-body scars in spin-1 XY magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 147201 (2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    Morettini, L

    G. Morettini, L. Capizzi, M. Fagotti, and L. Mazza, Unconventional transport in a system with a tower of quantum many-body scars, arXiv ePrints (2025), arXiv:2502.10387 [quant-ph]

    2025

  32. [40]

    Chandrasekharan and U.-J

    S. Chandrasekharan and U.-J. Wiese, Quantum link models: A discrete approach to gauge theories, Nuclear Physics B 492, 455 (1997)

    1997

  33. [41]

    Wiese, Ultracold quantum gases and lattice sys- tems: quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories, An- nalen der Physik 525, 777 (2013)

    U.-J. Wiese, Ultracold quantum gases and lattice sys- tems: quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories, An- nalen der Physik 525, 777 (2013)

    2013

  34. [42]

    Hauke, D

    P. Hauke, D. Marcos, M. Dalmonte, and P. Zoller, Quan- tum simulation of a lattice Schwinger model in a chain of trapped ions, Phys. Rev. X 3, 041018 (2013)

    2013

  35. [43]

    Maucher, N

    F. Maucher, N. Henkel, M. Saffman, W. Kr´ olikowski, S. Skupin, and T. Pohl, Rydberg-Induced Solitons: Three-Dimensional Self-Trapping of Matter Waves, Physical Review Letters 106, 170401 (2011)

    2011

  36. [44]

    Zhao, H.-J

    Y. Zhao, H.-J. Hu, Q.-Q. Zhou, Z.-C. Qiu, L. Xue, S.-L. Xu, Q. Zhou, and B. A. Malomed, Three-dimensional solitons in Rydberg-dressed cold atomic gases with spin–orbit coupling, Scientific Reports 13, 18079 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    Z. Bai, Q. Zhang, and G. Huang, Quantum reflections of nonlocal optical solitons in a cold Rydberg atomic gas, Physical Review A 101, 053845 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    Fleischhauer, A

    M. Fleischhauer, A. Imamoglu, and J. P. Marangos, Elec- tromagnetically induced transparency: Optics in coher- ent media, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 633 (2005)

    2005

  39. [47]

    Vidal, Classical simulation of infinite-size quantum lattice systems in one spatial dimension, Phys

    G. Vidal, Classical simulation of infinite-size quantum lattice systems in one spatial dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 070201 (2007)

    2007

  40. [48]

    Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics 326, 96 (2011)

    U. Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics 326, 96 (2011)

    2011

  41. [49]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The ITensor Software Library for Tensor Network Calcula- tions, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 4 (2022); Codebase re- lease 0.3 for ITensor, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 4 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    Forest and R

    E. Forest and R. D. Ruth, Fourth-order symplectic in- tegration, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 43, 105 (1990)

    1990

  43. [51]

    Yoshida, Construction of higher order symplectic in- tegrators, Physics Letters A 150, 262 (1990)

    H. Yoshida, Construction of higher order symplectic in- tegrators, Physics Letters A 150, 262 (1990)

    1990

  44. [52]

    Virtanen, R

    P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haber- land, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Pe- 10 terson, W. Weckesser, J. Bright, S. J. van der Walt, M. Brett, J. Wilson, K. J. Millman, N. Mayorov, A. R. J. Nelson, E. Jones, R. Kern, E. Larson, C. J. Carey, ˙I. Po- lat...

    2020

  45. [53]

    Discrete solitons in Rydberg atom chains

    Rainer Storn and K. Price, Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces, Journal of Global Optimization 11, 341 (1997), publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 1 Supplemental Online Material for “Discrete ...

    1997

  46. [54]

    Verification of phenomenological soliton description 1

  47. [55]

    Left-moving solitons and incoherent defects 3

  48. [56]

    Multiple Solitons 5

    Different scarred backgrounds 4 B. Multiple Solitons 5

  49. [57]

    Energy-carrying solitons and new scarred eigenstates 6

    Entanglement dynamics 6 C. Energy-carrying solitons and new scarred eigenstates 6

  50. [58]

    Translation fidelity of energy solitons 6

  51. [59]

    Spectral decomposition of solitons 7 S2

    Using solitons to construct scarred states with tunable energy 7 D. Spectral decomposition of solitons 7 S2. TDVP equations of motion and dynamics 8 A. Numerical optimization of angles 8 B. Stability of quantum solitons in TDVP dynamics 9 C. Collision 10 D. Classical solitons ...

  52. [60]

    Verification of phenomenological soliton description In Fig. 1 d of the main text, we have shown schematically the approximate dynamics, during one revival period T , of the scarred initial state |K⟩ and the same state perturbed with a single right-moving cell |R⟩. We validate...

  53. [61]

    Noting that the scarred cell satisfies C |S⟩ = |S⟩ it follows that CK l,r = K r,l, so right- moving soliton cells are mapped to left-moving ones and vice versa

    Left-moving solitons and incoherent defects The coherent propagation of the right-moving soliton, together with the chiral symmetry of the Hamiltonian in the form of {H, C} = 0 and the enforced condition on the left-moving soliton |L⟩ = C |R⟩, ensures the approximate leftwards...

  54. [62]

    Different scarred backgrounds Since the states consisting of the unit cells |S⟩, |L⟩ and |R⟩ lie on the same scarred trajectory (up to translation), the homogeneous states |KL⟩ = |L⟩⊗m and |KR⟩ = |R⟩⊗m show periodic revivals as well, as shown in Fig. S3. In comparison, the pol...

  55. [63]

    Collisions In the main text, we have examined collisions between counter-propagating solitons, initially separated by an even number d of scarred cells |S⟩. Comparing the translation fidelity right before the collision at t = (d/2)T and after the collision t = (d/2 + 1)T indic...

  56. [64]

    While their entanglement entropy still grows linearly in time as shown in previous works [13, 32], this growth is strongly suppressed

    Entanglement dynamics A characteristic property of scarred states is their slow growth of entanglement under unitary time-evolution compared to thermal states. While their entanglement entropy still grows linearly in time as shown in previous works [13, 32], this growth is str...

  57. [65]

    Translation fidelity of energy solitons Energy-carrying solitons |R±⟩ and |L±⟩ embedded in the scarred state |K⟩ propagate coherently and show even larger translation fidelity revivals than their counterparts with zero energy, as shown in Fig. S6. Since the energy soliton cell...

  58. [66]

    The state returns approximately to its initial configuration because each cell shifts 3 sites to the right per period (scarred states can be formed analogously by using |Lα⟩)

    Using solitons to construct scarred states with tunable energy Energy-carrying solitons cells |Rα⟩ can be used to create homogeneous scarred states with tunable energy of the form |Kα⟩ = |Rα⟩⊗l. The state returns approximately to its initial configuration because each cell shi...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.