Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 92 references

Spatiotemporal Order and Parametric Instabilities from First-Principles

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A complete symmetry analysis predicts that intense light can drive specific real crystals into a coherent incommensurate spatiotemporal pattern, with threshold fields in the few-MV/cm range.

desk verdict A useful symmetry-based roadmap for light-induced parametric instabilities, with a real but quantifiable soft spot in the q=0 coupling approximation. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.14110 v1 pith:B6J5LMDM submitted 2025-07-18 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.mes-hall

Daniel Kaplan , Pavel A. Volkov , Jennifer Coulter , Shiwei Zhang , Premala Chandra This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.mes-hall
keywords parametricresonancephonondown-conversionnon-centrosymmetricpointgroupsspatiotemporalorderfrozen-phononnonlinearcouplingfirst-principlesphononslight-drivenstructuraltransitionstime-resolveddiffraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a specific, symmetry-allowed nonlinearity lets light create a new kind of order in real crystals: a coherent incommensurate pattern of atomic displacements that oscillates at half the drive frequency. The authors complete the group-theory enumeration for all 21 non-centrosymmetric point groups, screen a large database of stable insulating crystals, and compute the relevant nonlinear couplings from first principles for the survivors. They identify concrete candidates—PbTiO3, Te, RuSi, and several polytypes of GaSe—with predicted threshold fields in the single-digit MV/cm range, which are accessible to current intense terahertz sources. If correct, the result turns an abstract parametric-resonance idea into a practical materials-design route for light-tunable spatiotemporal order.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the cubic parametric coupling $V_{1,2} = \chi^{1,2}_{i_1 j_2 j_3} Q_{i_1} P_{j_2} P_{j_3}$ between the driven zone-center mode $Q$ and the down-converted pair $P$, together with the resonance condition $\omega_P(q_0) = \Omega/2$ that fixes the ordering wavevector from the phonon dispersion. Symmetry enters through the requirement that $Q P^2$ transform as the trivial representation, which excludes all centrosymmetric groups and leaves 21 non-centrosymmetric point groups; the authors tabulate the allowed irreps of $Q$ and $P$ for each. The computational engine is a frozen-phonon first-principles workflow: displace atoms along the mass-normalized eigenvectors of $Q$ and $P$, compute the Born-Oppenheimer energy surface, extract the coupling as the slope of the $P$-mode mass versus $Q$ amplitude, and evaluate the threshold field using $Z^Q E_c/(M_Q M_P) = (\beta\Omega)^2/(2|\chi^{1,2}|)$. A screening pipeline filters stable non-centrosymmetric insulators by available phonon dispersions and a heuristic 20 percent frequency window around the resonance condition.

What would settle it

Drive PbTiO$_3$ with intense terahertz light at the 20.45 THz $A_1$ phonon and probe with time-resolved diffraction at fields near 4.68 MV/cm; the central claim predicts the emergence of an incommensurate Bragg peak at $q \approx 0.05$ Å$^{-1}$ along the tetragonal axis, whose intensity oscillates at half the drive frequency. A null result—no such peak at this field and frequency—would falsify the prediction, as would an observed ordering wavevector far from the dispersion-determined value.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a resonantly driven infrared-active phonon $Q$ at the zone center can, through the cubic coupling $V_{1,2} = \chi^{1,2} Q P^2$, parametrically amplify a pair of counter-propagating modes $P$ at momentum $\pm q_0$ and frequency $\omega_P(q_0)=\Omega/2$, producing a coherent spatiotemporal order that breaks both translational and time-translational symmetry. Inversion symmetry forbids the coupling because $Q$ is odd while $P^2$ is even, so the effect is restricted to the 21 non-centrosymmetric crystallographic point groups; the authors enumerate the allowed irreps of $Q$ and $P$ for every one of them and find that the high-symmetry groups $222$, $422$, $622$, and $432$ allow no down-converted mode at all. For candidate materials, they compute the coupling constant by frozen-phonon displacements, fit the mode mass $\partial^2 F/\partial \lambda_2^2 = \omega_P^2 + \lambda_1 m$, and convert the result to a critical field via the threshold identity. The concrete outcomes are threshold fields in the few-MV/cm range—PbTiO$_3$ at 4.68 MV/cm with $q_0\approx 0.05$ Å$^{-1}$, Te at 1.79 MV/cm with $q_0\approx 0.706$ Å$^{-1}$—plus a set of phases and thicknesses, such as the $\gamma$ monolayer of GaSe, where the coupling is symmetry-forbidden.

Load-bearing premise

The calculations take the nonlinear coupling $\chi^{1,2}$ computed at zero momentum to represent the coupling at the finite ordering wavevector $q_0$, justified only by the assumption that the mode frequencies do not deviate significantly from the parametric resonance condition; if $\chi$ depends strongly on momentum, the predicted thresholds and candidate ranking change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the predictions hold, PbTiO$_3$ should develop an incommensurate structural modulation with wavevector $q \approx 0.05$ Å$^{-1}$ along the tetragonal $c$-axis when driven at 20.45 THz with a field near 4.68 MV/cm, oscillating at half the drive frequency.
  • Te should show a chiral phonon-pair instability at $q_0 \approx 0.706$ Å$^{-1}$ along $\hat y$ with a critical field near 1.79 MV/cm, providing a path to light-tunable chiral order in an elemental solid.
  • The symmetry tables give an exhaustive classification: only the 21 non-centrosymmetric point groups can host the leading $Q P^2$ parametric coupling, and several high-symmetry groups ($222$, $422$, $622$, $432$) are completely excluded.
  • The nonlinear coupling is strongest when the driven and down-converted modes share the same atomic character, so ferroelectrics and compounds with well-separated atomic mass sectors are the most favorable search space.
  • The predicted order is detectable with time-resolved diffractive probes, making the instability a direct experimental fingerprint of broken inversion symmetry and of the local point group under illumination.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One testable extension is to compute $\chi^{1,2}$ in commensurate supercells at the predicted $q_0$; the $q=0$ approximation is the paper's stated weak point, and a strong momentum dependence would reorder the candidate list.
  • The same symmetry tables could be applied to heterostructures and moir\'e stacks, where the reduced effective point group may activate modes that are forbidden in the bulk, potentially lowering threshold fields.
  • If a pair of modes at $\pm q_0$ is coherently amplified, the time-modulated dielectric function should produce a detectable sideband in the transmitted or scattered field at $\Omega/2$, giving a table-top optical diagnostic that complements diffraction probes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a symmetry-based ab initio workflow for identifying materials that can host light-induced spatiotemporal parametric instabilities. In the proposed mechanism, a resonantly driven zone-center infrared-active phonon Q at frequency Ω couples through a cubic term χ Q P^2 to a phonon P at wavevector q and frequency Ω/2, producing a state with broken space and time translation symmetry. The authors enumerate the allowed irreps of Q and P for all non-centrosymmetric point groups, screen Materials Project for stable, non-magnetic insulating candidates, and compute the coupling constant χ_{1,2} by frozen-phonon DFT for representative systems (PbTiO3, Se/Te, RuSi, and GaSe polytypes). They report threshold electric fields, e.g., 4.68 MV/cm for PbTiO3 and 1.79 MV/cm for Te, together with ordering wavevectors q0, and argue that these thresholds are within current THz experimental reach.

Significance. If the quantitative predictions hold, this is a valuable contribution: it provides the first complete point-group selection rules for the Q P^2 parametric coupling, a concrete and reusable DFT-based screening pipeline, and several falsifiable predictions (threshold fields, ordering wavevectors, and chiral selectivity in Te) that can be tested by time-resolved diffraction. The symmetry enumeration and the materials survey are systematic, and the public repository for scripts and data is a strength. The main weakness is that the central threshold-field predictions rely on replacing the finite-q coupling that governs the instability by its q=0 value, with no quantitative estimate of the q-dispersion; this directly affects candidate ranking and the claimed experimental reach.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III and Table II] The central quantitative predictions, such as E_c = 1.79 MV/cm for Te in Table II, are computed from Eq. (5) using the q=0 frozen-phonon coupling χ_{1,2}, while the parametric instability occurs at the finite wavevector q0 fixed by ω_P(q0)=Ω/2. The approximation is stated in Sec. III ('we use the value of the coupling at q = 0, provided the frequency of the modes does not deviate significantly from the parametric resonance condition'), but no estimate of χ(q0)/χ(0) is given. For Te, q0=0.706 Å^-1 lies near the M point, where the P eigenvector, the little-group symmetry, and long-range LO-TO contributions can differ substantially from the Γ point. Since E_c ∝ 1/|χ|, an order-of-magnitude q-dispersion of χ would move the predicted thresholds outside the claimed experimental window and could reorder the candidate list. I request either a finite-q evaluation of χ_{1,2} for the key candidates (e.g., using supercells at q0 or DFPT with the appropriate wavevector), or, failing that, an explicit estimate of the q-dependence and a restriction of the 'within experimental reach' claim to small-q0 cases such as PbTiO3, where q0≈0.05 Å^-1 makes the approximation more plausible.
  2. [Sec. II, Eq. (5), and Sec. III] The threshold-field predictions are presented without any sensitivity analysis or uncertainty estimate, despite depending on quantities that are either assumed or heuristic: the broadening β is set to β=0.1ω_Q, and Eq. (5) gives E_c ∝ β^2, so a factor-of-two uncertainty in β changes the threshold by a factor of four. In addition, the resonance tolerance in Sec. III is called a heuristic bound, and the screening relies on phonon data from Ref. [19] while the coupling calculations use QE with PBEsol; it is not stated whether the phonon frequencies and eigenvectors used for screening were computed with the same functional and pseudopotentials. Please provide a sensitivity analysis for at least PbTiO3 and Te, or temper the claims about experimental reach accordingly, and clarify the consistency of the phonon data sources.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. II] The text says 'For each of the sixteen non-centrosymmetric point groups, we enumerate the irreps...' but Table I lists 21 non-centrosymmetric point groups, of which 17 have at least one allowed coupling. This inconsistency should be corrected, and if the enumeration intentionally excludes some groups, the exclusion should be stated explicitly.
  2. [Sec. III] The screening inequality is written as '|ωP − 2ωQ| < 0.2ωP', which is dimensionally inconsistent with the intended parametric condition 2ω_P ≈ ω_Q; it should presumably read '|2ω_P − ω_Q| < 0.2ω_P' (or similar). As written, the PbTiO3 example would not satisfy the stated bound.
  3. [Sec. IV B] The text identifies RuSi as 'B20 (space group 194)', but B20 is space group 198 (P2_13), while space group 194 is P6_3/mmc. Since the point-group-based screening is central to the paper, this number should be corrected.
  4. [Table III] The caption of Table III reads 'Summary of results for elemental chiral solids', but the table reports data for GaSe phases; the caption should refer to the layered chalcogenide results.
  5. [Eq. (9) and Fig. 4] The definition 'χ_{1,2} = ∂/∂λ_1 ∂^2E/∂λ_2^2' should specify the normalization of the displacement amplitudes λ_1, λ_2 and whether the quoted χ includes the combinatorial factor associated with P^2 in Eq. (4). A factor-of-two convention here would directly affect the extracted threshold fields.
  6. [Appendix B] The data and scripts are made available in a GitHub repository [42], but a versioned archival DOI would make the results more reproducible and citable; please consider depositing the code and data in a permanent repository.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the symmetry analysis, DFT coupling constants, and threshold fields rest on independent first-principles calculations, with self-citations only to prior analytic results.

full rationale

The paper's central quantitative predictions are obtained by (i) an exhaustive point-group enumeration determining symmetry-allowed couplings, (ii) DFT/PBEsol frozen-phonon energy surfaces that yield the nonlinear coupling chi via Eq. (9), and (iii) the analytic parametric-resonance threshold Eq. (5). Eq. (5) is taken from the authors' own Ref. [2], but it is a parameter-free analytic result following from the equations of motion stated in Sec. II, not a fit to the materials data and not an unverified premise imported solely by citation. The coupling constants are computed from first-principles energy surfaces without reference to experimental threshold fields or to the final E_c values, so there is no fitted-input-called-prediction loop. The only notable approximation, replacing the finite-q coupling by its q=0 value, is stated explicitly in Sec. III: "we use the value of the coupling at q = 0, provided the frequency of the modes does not deviate significantly from the parametric resonance condition." This is a modeling approximation rather than a definitional identification of the predicted quantity with an input. The symmetry selection rules in Table I are standard group-theoretic results checked against Bilbao Crystallographic Server data. No external benchmark or experimental data is used to tune the predictions. Self-citations to Ref. [2] occur, but they are not load-bearing in a circular sense because the cited result is analytic and independent of the present DFT inputs. Thus the derivation chain is self-contained; any concern about q-dispersion of chi is a correctness or robustness issue, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central predictions rest on standard perturbative nonlinear phononics, DFT accuracy, and the q=0 proxy for finite-q coupling. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • broadening beta = 0.1 omega_Q (assumed)
    Used in the critical field formula Eq. (5); not computed from first principles.
  • resonance tolerance = +/- 0.2 omega_P
    Ad hoc screening criterion for selecting candidate modes when exact 2omega_P = omega_Q is not met.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Born-Oppenheimer approximation and harmonic phonon basis
    Used throughout Secs. II and III to define phonon modes and energies.
  • domain assumption Perturbative, local expansion of the potential truncated at cubic order V1,2 = chi Q P^2
    Eq. (1) and following; higher-order terms are neglected as smaller.
  • domain assumption The driven Q mode is strictly at q = 0 and monochromatic
    Sec. II: 'Qi is resonant only for q = 0 and Omega approx omega_Q'.
  • domain assumption DFT with PBEsol provides quantitatively reliable phonon frequencies and nonlinear couplings
    Used for all numerical results; no convergence or error analysis is provided.
  • ad hoc to paper The q = 0 coupling approximates the finite-q coupling
    Sec. III: 'we use the value of the coupling at q = 0'.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spatiotemporal Order and Parametric Instabilities from First-Principles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/B6J5LMDM

@misc{pith2026250714110,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spatiotemporal Order and Parametric Instabilities from First-Principles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/B6J5LMDM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.14110}
}
read the original abstract

Shaping crystal structure with light is an enduring goal of physics and materials engineering. Here we present calculations in candidate materials selected by symmetry that allow light-induced spatiotemporal parametric instabilities. We demonstrate a theoretical framework that includes a complete symmetry analysis of phonon modes that contribute to parametric instabilities across all non-centrosymmetric point groups, a detailed survey of the materials landscape and finally the computation of nonlinear couplings from first principles. We then showcase detailed results for chiral crystals, ferroelectrics, and layered van der Waals materials. Our results pave the way towards realizing designer time-crystalline order in quantum materials, detectable with time-resolved diffractive probes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.14110 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of our theoretical framework [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Phonon dispersion and parametrically down [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Distribution of materials with parametric instabili [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Calculation of the coupling constant. (a) Free energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Phonon dispersion, representation inversion and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Coupling constants for Te between E modes. (a)-(b) Energy profiles of Te under Q excitations, which are color￾coded according the scale on the right of(b); (a) shows the energy change for Q, P modes of like chirality (clockwise), while (b) shows the energy change for d…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Phonon modes at Γ and their symmetries for each of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [19]

    Orbach, Nonlinear phonon generation, Physical Review Letters 16, 15 (1966)

    R. Orbach, Nonlinear phonon generation, Physical Review Letters 16, 15 (1966)

    work page 1966

  2. [1]

    The material stable is stable, Eh < 10−3eV

  3. [2]

    [17]); 4 Point groups and mode symmetries Crystal class Point group Q irrep

    The material is non-centrosymmetric, and is gapped (within PBE/GGA, as reported in Ref. [17]); 4 Point groups and mode symmetries Crystal class Point group Q irrep. P irrep. Example Triclinic 1 All All KIO3 Monoclinic 2 A All HgNO3 m A′ All Al2Se3 Orthorhombic mm2 A1 A1 ⊕ B1 ⊕ B2 CoAsS (CrSBr) 222 B1 ⊕ B2 ⊕ B3 ✗ ✗ Tetragonal 4 A All Cs3P7 −4 B E InPS4 4mm...

  4. [3]

    The material belongs to one of the 21 point groups relevant for parametric instabilities

  5. [4]

    The material has pre-computed phonon dispersion (with dynamical matrices) deposited in Ref. [19]

  6. [5]

    Label the phonon mode symmetries at Γ

  7. [6]

    Iden.” and “diff

    In keeping with Tab. I, check whether there are two modes with irreps. that conform to an IR mode and down-converted mode with frequencies s.t. ωQ = 2ωP ± 0.2ωp; After identifying the material in this manner, we pro- ceed to compute the coupling constant. The energy of the system in equilibrium is determined by its Born- Oppenheimer surface [ 22–24]. The ...

  8. [7]

    A. S. Disa, T. F. Nova, and A. Cavalleri, Engineering crystal structures with light, Nature Physics 17, 1087 (2021). 10

    2021

Show all 92 references
  1. [8]

    Kaplan, P

    D. Kaplan, P. A. Volkov, A. Chakraborty, Z. Zhuang, and P. Chandra, Tunable spatiotemporal orders in driven insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 066902 (2025a)

    2025

  2. [9]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Mechanics and electrodynamics (Elsevier, 2013)

    2013

  3. [10]

    N. Y. Yao, C. Nayak, L. Balents, and M. P. Zaletel, Classical discrete time crystals, Nature Physics 16, 438 (2020)

    2020

  4. [11]

    M. P. Zaletel, M. Lukin, C. Monroe, C. Nayak, F. Wilczek, and N. Y. Yao, Colloquium: Quantum and classical discrete time crystals, Reviews of Modern Physics 95, 031001 (2023)

    2023

  5. [12]

    Agam and B

    O. Agam and B. L. Altshuler, “scars” in parametrically excited surface waves, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 302, 310 (2001)

    2001

  6. [13]

    S. O. Demokritov, V. E. Demidov, O. Dzyapko, G. A. Melkov, A. A. Serga, B. Hillebrands, and A. N. Slavin, Bose–einstein condensation of quasi-equilibrium magnons at room temperature under pumping, Nature 443, 430 (2006)

    2006

  7. [14]

    Hosseinabadi, Y

    H. Hosseinabadi, Y. Tserkovnyak, E. Demler, and J. Marino, Magnon nesting in driven two-dimensional quantum magnets (2025), arXiv:2505.10531 [cond- mat.mtrl-sci]

    2025

  8. [15]

    E. I. Kiselev, J. F. Karcher, M. S. Rudner, R. Duine, and N. H. Lindner, Exciting terahertz magnons with amplitude modulated light: spin pumping, squeezed states, symmetry breaking and pattern formation (2025), arXiv:2507.08147 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2025 arXiv

  9. [16]

    E. I. Kiselev, M. S. Rudner, and N. H. Lindner, In- ducing exceptional points, enhancing plasmon quality and creating correlated plasmon states with modulated floquet parametric driving, Nature Communications 15, 10.1038/s41467-024-53709-0 (2024)

    2024 doi

  10. [17]

    Kleiner, X

    R. Kleiner, X. Zhou, E. Dorsch, X. Zhang, D. Koelle, and D. Jin, Space-time crystalline order of a high-critical- temperature superconductor with intrinsic josephson junc- tions, Nature Communications 12, 6038 (2021)

    2021

  11. [18]

    Dzero, E

    M. Dzero, E. Yuzbashyan, and B. Altshuler, Cooper pair turbulence in atomic fermi gases, Europhysics Letters 85, 20004 (2009)

    2009

  12. [20]

    H. Liu, I. Gierz, J. C. Petersen, S. Kaiser, A. Simon- cig, A. L. Cavalieri, C. Cacho, I. Turcu, E. Springate, F. Frassetto, et al., Possible Observation of Parametri- cally Amplified Coherent Phasons in K0.3M oO3 using Time-Resolved Extreme-Ultraviolet Angle-Resolved Pho- toe...

    2013

  13. [21]

    Cartella, T

    A. Cartella, T. F. Nova, M. Fechner, R. Merlin, and A. Cavalleri, Parametric amplification of optical phonons, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 12148 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    D. M. Juraschek, Q. N. Meier, and P. Narang, Parametric excitation of an optically silent goldstone-like phonon mode, Physical review letters 124, 117401 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    A. Jain, S. P. Ong, G. Hautier, W. Chen, W. D. Richards, S. Dacek, S. Cholia, D. Gunter, D. Skinner, G. Ceder, et al., Commentary: The materials project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL materials 1 (2013)

    2013

  16. [24]

    J. M. Munro, K. Latimer, M. K. Horton, S. Dwarak- nath, and K. A. Persson, An improved symmetry-based approach to reciprocal space path selection in band struc- ture calculations, npj Computational Materials 6, 112 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    Petretto, S

    G. Petretto, S. Dwaraknath, H. PC Miranda, D. Winston, M. Giantomassi, M. J. Van Setten, X. Gonze, K. A. Pers- son, G. Hautier, and G.-M. Rignanese, High-throughput density-functional perturbation theory phonons for inor- ganic materials, Scientific data 5, 1 (2018)

    2018

  18. [26]

    P. H. Butler, Point group symmetry applications: methods and tables (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    2012

  19. [27]

    J. D. Dunitz, Symmetry arguments in chemistry, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93, 14260 (1996)

    1996

  20. [28]

    R. G. Woolley, Quantum theory and molecular structure, Advances in Physics 25, 27 (1976)

    1976

  21. [29]

    Ess´ en, The physics of the born–oppenheimer approxi- mation, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 12, 721 (1977)

    H. Ess´ en, The physics of the born–oppenheimer approxi- mation, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 12, 721 (1977)

    1977

  22. [30]

    Argaman and G

    N. Argaman and G. Makov, Density functional theory: An introduction, American Journal of Physics 68, 69 (2000)

    2000

  23. [31]

    Gonze and C

    X. Gonze and C. Lee, Dynamical matrices, Born effective charges, dielectric permittivity tensors, and interatomic force constants from density-functional perturbation the- ory, Physical Review B 55 (1997)

    1997

  24. [32]

    Baroni, S

    S. Baroni, S. de Gironcoli, A. Dal Corso, and P. Gian- nozzi, Phonons and related crystal properties from density- functional perturbation theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 515 (2001)

    2001

  25. [33]

    Weyrich, “frozen” phonon calculations: Lattice dy- namics and-instabilities, Ferroelectrics 104, 183 (1990)

    K. Weyrich, “frozen” phonon calculations: Lattice dy- namics and-instabilities, Ferroelectrics 104, 183 (1990)

    1990

  26. [34]

    Subedi, A

    A. Subedi, A. Cavalleri, and A. Georges, Theory of non- linear phononics for coherent light control of solids, Phys. Rev. B 89, 220301 (2014)

    2014

  27. [35]

    Subedi, Proposal for ultrafast switching of ferroelectrics using midinfrared pulses, Phys

    A. Subedi, Proposal for ultrafast switching of ferroelectrics using midinfrared pulses, Phys. Rev. B 92, 214303 (2015)

    2015

  28. [36]

    Subedi, Light-control of materials via nonlinear phonon- ics, Comptes Rendus

    A. Subedi, Light-control of materials via nonlinear phonon- ics, Comptes Rendus. Physique 22, 161 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    D. G. Schlom, L.-Q. Chen, C.-B. Eom, K. M. Rabe, S. K. Streiffer, and J.-M. Triscone, Strain tuning of ferroelectric thin films, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 37, 589 (2007)

    2007

  30. [38]

    K. M. Rabe and P. Ghosez, First- principles studies of ferroelectric oxides, in Physics of Ferroelectrics: A Modern Perspective (Springer, 2007) pp. 117–174

    2007

  31. [39]

    K. M. Rabe, M. Dawber, C. Lichtensteiger, C. H. Ahn, and J.-M. Triscone, Modern physics of ferroelectrics: Essential background, in Physics of Ferroelectrics: A Modern Perspective (Springer, 2007) pp. 1–30

    2007

  32. [40]

    Ghosez, E

    P. Ghosez, E. Cockayne, U. V. Waghmare, and K. M. Rabe, Lattice dynamics of batio3, pbtio3, and pbzro3: A comparative first-principles study, Phys. Rev. B 60, 836 (1999)

    1999

  33. [41]

    Tomeno, Y

    I. Tomeno, Y. Ishii, Y. Tsunoda, and K. Oka, Lattice dynamics of tetragonal PbTio3, Phys. Rev. B 73, 064116 (2006)

    2006

  34. [42]

    J. D. Freire and R. S. Katiyar, Lattice dynamics of crystals with tetragonal batio3 structure, Phys. Rev. B 37, 2074 (1988)

    1988

  35. [43]

    Freire and R

    J. Freire and R. Katiyar, Dynamical study of phonons in pbtio3, Solid State Communications 40, 903 (1981). 11

    1981

  36. [44]

    Basini, M

    M. Basini, M. Pancaldi, B. Wehinger, M. Udina, V. Unikandanunni, T. Tadano, M. C. Hoffmann, A. V. Balatsky, and S. Bonetti, Terahertz electric-field-driven dynamical multiferroicity in srtio3, Nature 628, 534 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Hafez, X

    H. Hafez, X. Chai, A. Ibrahim, S. Mondal, D. F´ erachou, X. Ropagnol, and T. Ozaki, Intense terahertz radiation and their applications, Journal of Optics 18, 093004 (2016)

    2016

  38. [46]

    Orenstein, V

    G. Orenstein, V. Krapivin, Y. Huang, Z. Zhang, G. de la Pe˜ na Mu˜ noz, R. A. Duncan, Q. Nguyen, J. Stanton, S. Teitelbaum, H. Yavas, et al., Observation of polariza- tion density waves in srtio3, Nature Physics , 1 (2025)

    2025

  39. [47]

    Fechner, M

    M. Fechner, M. F¨ orst, G. Orenstein, V. Krapivin, A. Disa, M. Buzzi, A. von Hoegen, G. de la Pena, Q. Nguyen, R. Mankowsky, et al., Quenched lattice fluctuations in optically driven srtio3, Nature Materials 23, 363 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    https://github.com/danielkaplan137/spatioMaterials

  41. [49]

    Teuchert and R

    W. Teuchert and R. Geick, Symmetry of lattice vibrations in selenium and tellurium, physica status solidi (b) 61, 123 (1974)

    1974

  42. [50]

    A. S. Pine and G. Dresselhaus, Raman spectra and lattice dynamics of tellurium, Phys. Rev. B 4, 356 (1971)

    1971

  43. [51]

    H. Wendel, Lattice dynamics of trigonal se- lenium and tellurium—state of the art, in The Physics of Selenium and Tellurium: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Physics of Selenium and Tellurium, K¨ onigstein, Fed. Rep. of Germany, May 28–31, 1979 (Springer, 197...

    1979

  44. [52]

    Zhang and S

    T. Zhang and S. Murakami, Chiral phonons and pseu- doangular momentum in nonsymmorphic systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, L012024 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    Powell and P

    B. Powell and P. Martel, The lattice dynamics of tel- lurium, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 36, 1287 (1975)

    1975

  46. [54]

    R. M. Martin, G. Lucovsky, and K. Helliwell, Intermolec- ular bonding and lattice dynamics of se and te, Phys. Rev. B 13, 1383 (1976)

    1976

  47. [55]

    L. F. Mattheiss and D. R. Hamann, Band structure and semiconducting properties of fesi, Phys. Rev. B 47, 13114 (1993)

    1993

  48. [56]

    Perring, F

    L. Perring, F. Bussy, J. Gachon, and P. Feschotte, The ruthenium–silicon system, Journal of alloys and com- pounds 284, 198 (1999)

    1999

  49. [57]

    Robredo, N

    I. Robredo, N. B. Schr¨ oter, C. Felser, J. Cano, B. Bradlyn, and M. G. Vergniory, Multifold topological semimetals, Europhysics Letters 147, 46001 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    W. Li, X. Zhang, J. Yang, S. Zhou, C. Song, P. Cheng, Y.-Q. Zhang, B. Feng, Z. Wang, Y. Lu, et al., Emergence of ferroelectricity in a nonferroelectric monolayer, Nature Communications 14, 2757 (2023)

    2023

  51. [59]

    Ramasamy, D

    P. Ramasamy, D. Kwak, D.-H. Lim, H.-S. Ra, and J.- S. Lee, Solution synthesis of ges and gese nanosheets for high-sensitivity photodetectors, Journal of Materials Chemistry C 4, 479 (2016)

    2016

  52. [60]

    Kamal, A

    C. Kamal, A. Chakrabarti, and M. Ezawa, Direct band gaps in group iv-vi monolayer materials: Binary counter- parts of phosphorene, Phys. Rev. B 93, 125428 (2016)

    2016

  53. [61]

    Wu and X

    M. Wu and X. C. Zeng, Intrinsic ferroelasticity and/or multiferroicity in two-dimensional phosphorene and phos- phorene analogues, Nano letters 16, 3236 (2016)

    2016

  54. [62]

    C. Xin, J. Zheng, Y. Su, S. Li, B. Zhang, Y. Feng, and F. Pan, Few-layer tin sulfide: a new black-phosphorus- analogue 2d material with a sizeable band gap, odd–even quantum confinement effect, and high carrier mobility, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 120, 22663 (2016)

    2016

  55. [63]

    Jindal, A

    A. Jindal, A. Saha, Z. Li, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. C. Hone, T. Birol, R. M. Fernandes, C. R. Dean, A. N. Pasupathy, et al., Coupled ferroelectricity and superconductivity in bilayer td-mote2, Nature 613, 48 (2023)

    2023

  56. [64]

    Lipatov, P

    A. Lipatov, P. Chaudhary, Z. Guan, H. Lu, G. Li, O. Cr´ egut, K. D. Dorkenoo, R. Proksch, S. Cherifi-Hertel, D.-F. Shao, et al., Direct observation of ferroelectricity in two-dimensional mos2, npj 2D Materials and Applications 6, 18 (2022)

    2022

  57. [65]

    X. Li, B. Qin, Y. Wang, Y. Xi, Z. Huang, M. Zhao, Y. Peng, Z. Chen, Z. Pan, J. Zhu, et al., Sliding ferro- electric memories and synapses based on rhombohedral- stacked bilayer mos2, Nature Communications 15, 10921 (2024)

    2024

  58. [66]

    Ouyang, S

    T. Ouyang, S. Cha, Y. Sun, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, N. M. Gabor, and C. H. Lui, Electrically switching ferroelectric order in 3r-mos2 layers, Nano Letters (2025)

    2025

  59. [67]

    A. Kuhn, A. Chevy, and R. Chevalier, Crystal structure and interatomic distances in gase, physica status solidi (a) 31, 469 (1975)

    1975

  60. [68]

    Adler, R

    C. Adler, R. Honke, P. Pavone, and U. Schr¨ oder, First- principles investigation of the lattice dynamics ofϵ−GaSe, Phys. Rev. B 57, 3726 (1998)

    1998

  61. [69]

    M. Ider, R. Pankajavalli, W. Zhuang, J. Shen, and T. An- derson, Thermochemistry of the ga-se system, ECS Jour- nal of Solid State Science and Technology 4, Q51 (2015)

    2015

  62. [70]

    Srour, M

    J. Srour, M. Badawi, F. El Haj Hassan, and A. Postnikov, Comparative study of structural and electronic proper- ties of gase and inse polytypes, The Journal of Chemical Physics 149, 054106 (2018)

    2018

  63. [71]

    Filippetto, P

    D. Filippetto, P. Musumeci, R. K. Li, B. J. Siwick, M. R. Otto, M. Centurion, and J. P. F. Nunes, Ultrafast electron diffraction: Visualizing dynamic states of matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 045004 (2022)

    2022

  64. [72]

    C. Kloc, E. Arushanov, M. Wendl, H. Hohl, U. Malang, and E. Bucher, Preparation and properties of fesi, α- fesi2 and β-fesi2 single crystals, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 219, 93 (1995)

    1995

  65. [73]

    N. B. Schr¨ oter, D. Pei, M. G. Vergniory, Y. Sun, K. Manna, F. De Juan, J. A. Krieger, V. S¨ uss, M. Schmidt, P. Dudin, et al., Chiral topological semimetal with multi- fold band crossings and long fermi arcs, Nature Physics 15, 759 (2019)

    2019

  66. [74]

    Su´ arez-Rodr ´ ıguez, F

    M. Su´ arez-Rodr ´ ıguez, F. De Juan, I. Souza, M. Gobbi, F. Casanova, and L. E. Hueso, Non-linear transport in non-centrosymmetric systems: From fundamentals to applications, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.05253 (2024)

    2024

  67. [75]

    Kaplan, K

    D. Kaplan, K. P. Lucht, P. A. Volkov, and J. Pixley, Quantum geometric photocurrents of quasiparticles in su- perconductors, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.12265 (2025b)

    2025 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Zhuang, A

    Z. Zhuang, A. Chakraborty, P. Chandra, P. Coleman, and P. A. Volkov, Light-driven transitions in quantum paraelectrics, Physical Review B 107, 224307 (2023)

    2023

  69. [77]

    Kogar, A

    A. Kogar, A. Zong, P. E. Dolgirev, X. Shen, J. Straqua- dine, Y.-Q. Bie, X. Wang, T. Rohwer, I.-C. Tung, Y. Yang, et al., Light-induced charge density wave in late3, Nature Physics 16, 159 (2020)

    2020

  70. [78]

    J. S. H. Lee, T. M. Sutter, G. Karapetrov, P. Musumeci, and A. Kogar, Topological phase transition to a hidden charge density wave liquid (2025), arXiv:2505.04867 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2025 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Bordoloi, D

    A. Bordoloi, D. Kaplan, and S. Singh, Tunable stacking-driven topological phase transitions in pnic- 12 tide layers, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2504.21126 (2025), arXiv:2504.21126 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2025

  72. [80]

    H. Wei, D. Kaplan, H. Xu, and J. Li, Ultrafast switch- able polar and magnetic orders by nonlinear light-matter interaction, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2504.04662 (2025), arXiv:2504.04662 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    2025 arXiv

  73. [81]

    L. L. H. Lau, A. Gleis, D. Kaplan, P. Chandra, and P. Coleman, Oscillate and renormalize: Fast phonons reshape the kondo effect in flat-band systems, Phys. Rev. B 111, 245149 (2025)

    2025

  74. [82]

    Coulter and A

    J. Coulter and A. J. Millis, Electron-phonon coupling in correlated materials: insights from the hubbard-holstein model, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.08081 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococ- cioni, I. Dabo, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F. ...

    2009

  76. [84]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, N. Colonna, I. Carnimeo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, R. A. D. Jr, A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G. Fugallo, R. Gebauer, U. Gerst-...

    2017

  77. [85]

    S. P. Huber, S. Zoupanos, M. Uhrin, L. Talirz, L. Kahle, R. H¨ auselmann, D. Gresch, T. M¨ uller, A. V. Yakutovich, C. W. Andersen, et al., Aiida 1.0, a scalable computa- tional infrastructure for automated reproducible workflows and data provenance, Scientific data 7, 300 (2020)

    2020

  78. [86]

    Uhrin, S

    M. Uhrin, S. P. Huber, J. Yu, N. Marzari, and G. Pizzi, Workflows in aiida: Engineering a high-throughput, event- based engine for robust and modular computational work- flows, Computational Materials Science 187, 110086 (2021)

    2021

  79. [87]

    H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Special points for brillouin-zone integrations, Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188 (1976)

    1976

  80. [88]

    J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vydrov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Restoring the density-gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136406 (2008)

    2008

  81. [89]

    Prandini, A

    G. Prandini, A. Marrazzo, I. E. Castelli, N. Mounet, and N. Marzari, Precision and efficiency in solid-state pseu- dopotential calculations, npj Computational Materials 4, 72 (2018), http://materialscloud.org/sssp

    2018

  82. [90]

    Dal Corso, Pseudopotentials periodic table: From h to pu, Computational Materials Science 95, 337 (2014)

    A. Dal Corso, Pseudopotentials periodic table: From h to pu, Computational Materials Science 95, 337 (2014)

    2014

  83. [91]

    Hinuma, G

    Y. Hinuma, G. Pizzi, Y. Kumagai, F. Oba, and I. Tanaka, Band structure diagram paths based on crystallography, Computational Materials Science 128, 140–184 (2017)

    2017

  84. [92]

    M. I. Aroyo, A. Kirov, C. Capillas, J. Perez-Mato, and H. Wondratschek, Bilbao crystallographic server. ii. rep- resentations of crystallographic point groups and space groups, Foundations of Crystallography 62, 115 (2006)

    2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.