Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 69 references

Label free sub-diffraction imaging using non-linear photon avalanche backlight

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A photon avalanche backlight images unlabeled samples at 70 nm resolution.

desk verdict A clever new imaging concept with a credible contrast-enhancement proof of concept, but the 'ca. 70 nm resolution' claim does not hold up against the paper's own measured nonlinearity. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.14667 v1 pith:I62XYHAY submitted 2025-07-19 physics.optics cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Suresh Karmegam , Marcin Szalkowski , Malgorzata Misiak , Katarzyna Prorok , Damian Szymański , Artur Bednarkiewicz This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticscond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords transmissionavalanchebacklightmicroscopyphotonlabel-freesuper-resolutionimagingsub-diffractionTm3+dopedLiYF4virtualnear-fieldaperturecontrastenhancementnonlinearoptics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes and experimentally demonstrates transmission avalanche backlight (TAB) microscopy, a label-free, far-field, raster-scanning method that images unlabeled, weakly attenuating samples below the diffraction limit. The idea is to place a highly nonlinear photon-avalanching crystal behind the sample; the transmitted pump light excites the crystal, and because avalanche luminescence scales as the $S$-th power of pump intensity, a tiny transmission drop in the sample becomes a large drop in detected luminescence. The same nonlinearity narrows the effective point spread function by roughly $\sqrt{S}$, so the diffraction-limited excitation spot acts as a sub-diffraction virtual aperture. Using Tm$^{3+}$-doped LiYF$_4$ microcrystals with $S \approx 8.5$ as the backlight, the authors image gold nanostructures with feature sizes of 50–70 nm, about a fourfold improvement over the diffraction limit at the 1064 nm pump wavelength. If it holds up, TAB would give biologists and materials scientists a simple way to see transparent unlabeled structures without fluorescent labels or complex reconstruction.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is photon avalanche: a steep, thresholded nonlinearity in which excited-state absorption plus energy cross-relaxation between neighboring Tm$^{3+}$ ions makes emission follow $I_L = (I_P)^S$ with $S$ far above 1. The paper's identity is the luminescence intensity ratio $\mathrm{LIR} = I'_L/I_L = T^S$, derived from multiplying the pump by the sample transmittance $T$; from it follow the contrast $C = 1 - T^S$ and the $\sqrt{S}$ narrowing of the effective point spread function, giving the sub-diffraction virtual aperture. The instrument is a simple single-beam confocal laser scanning microscope with a 1064 nm pump and 800 nm detection, with the Tm$^{3+}$-doped LiYF$_4$ microcrystal acting as the avalanche backlight substrate.

What would settle it

Image a calibrated absorbing edge with known transmittance $T$ under TAB at two different pump powers and two sample-to-backlight distances: if the extracted transmittance or the apparent edge width changes with either, the local $I_P^S T^S$ model fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a bulky photon-avalanching crystal can serve as a virtual near-field nano aperture that backlights a label-free sample, and that the avalanche nonlinearity simultaneously amplifies contrast and sharpens resolution. For a sample with transmittance $T$, the detected luminescence becomes $I'_L = T^S I_L$ (Eq. 1), so contrast $C = 1 - T^S$; a 5% absorption at $S=20$ cuts the signal to 36%, translating a small shadow into a strong modulation. The effective point spread function narrows as $S^{-1/2}$, which the authors simulate for thin layers, overlapping layers, and nanoparticles, and then demonstrate experimentally on laser-annealed gold films and islands. Their 3% Tm$^{3+}$ LiYF$_4$ avalanche backlight substrate has nonlinearity index $8.5 \pm 1.0$, is photostable under $>550$ kW/cm$^2$ for 120 s, and the TAB images resolve 50–70 nm gold islands as 110–250 nm features, below the theoretical diffraction limit and with roughly fourfold improved resolution.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the sample's only effect is to multiply the local pump intensity by its transmittance $T$ while the backlight obeys a single power law $I_L=(I_P)^S$ across the whole spot, a premise the paper itself qualifies by noting that its simulations disregarded scattering, multiple reflections, and diffraction on the sample.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A 1% attenuation at $S=20$ produces an 18.2% luminescence drop, so high-$S$ substrates let nearly transparent films be seen without labels.
  • Resolution improves roughly as $S^{-1/2}$; with $S=30$ the simulations place edge detection near 100 nm, and larger $S$ should push it further.
  • Because $T(\lambda)=10^{-A_T(\lambda)}$ connects to Beer–Lambert absorption, TAB can in principle quantify local absorption, concentration, or thickness after calibration.
  • The photostable, non-blinking backlight allows long in-situ time-lapse observation, and the far-field geometry avoids the probe contamination problems of near-field scanning methods.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension, not stated by the paper, is that TAB could become a quantitative optical-density microscope: with a calibration curve, the $T^S$ amplification turns each pixel into a local transmittance measurement at sub-diffraction resolution.
  • The $\sqrt{S}$ resolution gain suggests that switching to avalanche materials with reported nonlinearities above 20 could push the practical resolution toward a few tens of nanometers, limited eventually by the 800 nm emission wavelength used for detection.
  • The paper's own control logic indicates that measuring pump-power-dependent profiles can distinguish pure attenuation from quenching or energy transfer; a natural next step is to use that discrimination as a rudimentary chemical contrast channel in label-free imaging.
  • For biological samples, a flat, large-area avalanche backlight substrate would be needed; the paper's observed rotation and translation of its pyramidal microcrystals under the focused beam is a practical obstacle that the current crystal form does not solve.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes transmission avalanche backlight (TAB) microscopy, a scanning far-field technique in which a photon-avalanching microcrystal acts as a nonlinear backlight. The sample attenuates the pump beam, and the avalanche nonlinearity is argued to amplify contrast according to T^S and to narrow the effective point-spread function roughly as S^{-1/2}. The authors characterize Tm:LiYF4 microcrystals with S = 8.5 ± 1.0, demonstrate strong contrast enhancement on thin gold films, scratches, and laser-annealed gold islands, and report images of 50–70 nm features. They claim in the Abstract a 'ca. 70 nm optical resolution.' The paper also presents rate-equation simulations for attenuation and quenching mechanisms and image simulations based on SEM phantoms.

Significance. If the resolution claim were properly supported, TAB would be an attractive label-free far-field imaging method: it requires a simple single-beam scanning setup, needs no reconstruction, and offers large contrast amplification for weakly absorbing samples. The contrast-enhancement experiments on gold films are convincing and consistent with the T^S amplification rule, and the authors are to be credited for explicitly acknowledging limitations such as neglected scattering/diffraction and ABS inhomogeneity. The main weakness is the resolution claim: the 70 nm figure is inconsistent with the measured nonlinearity and the experimental evidence is not a valid resolution test. With a corrected claim and a dedicated two-point resolution measurement, the work could be a meaningful contribution to label-free sub-diffraction imaging.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Conclusion] The headline claim of 'ca. 70 nm optical resolution' in the Abstract is unsupported by the manuscript's own parameters and is internally inconsistent with the Conclusion. The measured nonlinearity is S = 8.5 ± 1.0; using the paper's own √S PSF-narrowing rule with λ = 1064 nm and NA = 1.45 gives an effective PSF of approximately 125 nm, and reaching 70 nm would require S ≈ 23, the value the Introduction associates with ANP labels rather than the present ABS crystals. The Conclusion states that 30–50 nm Au islands were visualized as 110–250 nm objects, which is consistent with a ~125 nm PSF and directly contradicts the 70 nm claim. The abstract and title-level claims must be corrected or the 70 nm number removed.
  2. [Figure 5 and 'TAB imaging' section] The sub-diffraction resolution claim is not established by the experiment. Figure 5 compares TAB cross-sections of individual Au islands with SEM images, but for isolated objects smaller than the effective PSF the apparent dip width is set by the PSF, not by the object size, so reporting '50–70 nm features' does not demonstrate resolution of two closely spaced objects. The average island spacing of 126.7 nm is mentioned, but no data show that adjacent islands separated by ~70 nm are resolved. A proper resolution test (for example, pairs of features at controlled separations or Fourier ring correlation) is required. In addition, the simulations shown in Figure 5 use the same power-law model that is being validated, so they cannot provide independent support for the resolution claim.
  3. [TAB simulations after Figure 2 and Eq. (1)] The quantitative predictions rely on the assumption that the sample acts only as a local multiplier of pump intensity and that the ABS response is a homogeneous, instantaneous power law with constant S. The authors explicitly state that the simulations 'disregarded light scattering, multiple reflections or light diffraction effects on the sample.' Since S itself depends on pump power (Eq. 1 defines S(I_P), and Figure 3 shows pump-power-dependent contrast and LIR), the constant-S approximation must be justified at the operating point used in the Figure 5 experiments; otherwise the extracted PSF width and the T^S contrast calibration are not quantitatively reliable. The experimental geometry, in which ABS crystals are dropped onto the sample, also introduces an unknown gap, and the authors note that increased sample-to-ABS distance hampers resolution; this should be quantified or controlled in the resolution test.
  4. [Interpretation of gold-island images] The gold-island images are interpreted as pure transmittance maps, but at 1064 nm gold islands can scatter as well as attenuate the pump. The text dismisses plasmonic effects heuristically based on island size and distance from the ABS, but no quantitative estimate of scattering or near-field coupling is provided. Since the T^S model treats the sample as a pure transmittance mask, scattering contributions could systematically broaden or distort the observed dips and would affect the claimed resolution. The authors should either rule out this contribution experimentally (for example, by varying the gap) or include scattering in the model.
minor comments (5)
  1. [TAB simulations] The Gaussian definition is inconsistent: δ_p0 is called the full width at half maximum but is used in exp(−(x−x0)^2/δ_p0^2), which requires a 1/e^2 radius or a standard deviation; using FWHM in that expression changes the effective PSF width by a factor of about 2.35.
  2. [Gold-film contrast discussion] The text states 'at 1064 nm, where the real interaction occurs, this contrast is equal to 40% (Figure S3.2)', but Figure S3.2 elsewhere appears to show photostability data; the cross-reference should be checked and corrected.
  3. [Eq. (3)] The symbol S_A for absolute sensitivity is easily confused with the nonlinearity index S; a different symbol or a more explicit definition would improve readability.
  4. [Introduction] The sentence 'The Abbe–Rayleigh diffraction limit can be overcame' contains a grammatical error and should read 'can be overcome.'
  5. [Conclusion] The phrase '30–50 nm large Au islands as 110–250 nm objects below diffraction limit of light' is imprecise, since 'below the diffraction limit' should refer to a resolution value rather than to object size.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation chain: contrast and resolution follow from an independently measured power law, but the 'ca. 70 nm' headline number is inconsistent with the paper's own S=8.5 and 110–250 nm conclusion, which is a correctness issue rather than a circular one.

full rationale

Walking the claimed derivation chain: Equation 1 (LIR = T^S) is not circular because it is an algebraic consequence of the independently measured PA power law I_L = (I_P)^S, with S = 8.5 +/- 1.0 obtained from pump-power curves (Figure S3.1), not from the TAB images themselves. The contrast enhancement and PSF-narrowing predictions (Figures 1 and 2) are forward consequences of the same model; the Figure 5 simulation uses an SEM-derived phantom with a stated transmission and S value, so it is a controlled forward model, and the comparison to real SEM images is an external check. The central mechanism is therefore not self-referential by construction. The main weakness is not circularity: the abstract's 'ca. 70 nm optical resolution' is not derivable from the measured S=8.5 (which under the paper's own S^-1/2 rule gives roughly 125 nm at lambda=1064 nm and NA=1.45), and the conclusion states that 30-50 nm Au islands were visualized as 110-250 nm objects. That is an internal inconsistency or overclaim, but no equation reduces to its own input. The only self-citation (ref. 60 for the 'S^-0.5 rule of thumb') is not load-bearing because the same Gaussian-beam-times-T^S algorithm is specified in the Methods and reproduced in the simulations, so the derivation is self-contained even if the numerical headline is not.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities (particles, forces, dimensions) are introduced. The "virtual near-field nano aperture" is a descriptive metaphor for the nonlinearity-narrowed excitation spot, not an independently testable entity.

free parameters (3)
  • Nonlinearity index S = 8.5 +/- 1.0 (measured from pump-power dependence)
    Central to the contrast and resolution claims; treated as a single constant in simulations despite being pump-power dependent.
  • Phantom transmission values = 3%, 2%, 20%, 10% depending on simulated scenario
    Chosen by hand in Figure 2 simulations to illustrate contrast and resolution; not experimentally determined.
  • SEM-based phantom modulation depth = 20%
    Chosen for the Figure 5c simulation using the SEM image as the sample; affects the simulated TAB map.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption I_L = I_P^S power-law response holds locally and for a single exponent S
    Used in Eq.1, Eq.2, and the TAB simulations; PA materials show this behavior only in a limited pump range and S varies with pump power and position.
  • domain assumption Simulations may neglect scattering, multiple reflections, and diffraction
    Explicitly stated after Figure 2: "we disregarded light scattering, multiple reflections or light diffraction effects on the sample"; these will occur in real TAB imaging.
  • domain assumption ABS is a perfectly homogeneous backlight in the model
    Stated before Figure 2: "we assumed perfectly homogenous avalanching backlighting of the sample"; experimental ABS crystals show local Tm/Y/F variations and edge effects.
  • domain assumption Rate-equation parameters from ref 68 apply to these microcrystals
    The PA modeling uses cross-sections, radiative rates, and CR rates taken from Lee et al. (Nature 2021) rather than measured for the 3% Tm LiYF4 microcrystals used here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Label free sub-diffraction imaging using non-linear photon avalanche backlight." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/I62XYHAY

@misc{pith2026250714667,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Label free sub-diffraction imaging using non-linear photon avalanche backlight},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/I62XYHAY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.14667}
}
read the original abstract

Optical imaging below the limit of light diffraction offers an unprecedented opportunity to study outlook, organization, interactions or in-situ functioning of sub-micrometer, highly transparent objects such as subcellular structures in vitro, thin layers or nano-engineered devices. However, most of current methodologies require to use specially designed luminescent labels, which not only may affect the properties of the sample itself, but often are (photo)toxic, susceptible to photobleaching, offer limited color combinations or specificity of labeling. Moreover, the dedicated fluorescence based super-resolution optical techniques are often technically complex and cumbersome to use. The existing non-destructive, non-invasive and label-free super-resolution imaging (SRI) methods are also challenging, complex and elusive to apply. To address these issues, here we propose and experimentally demonstrate a new concept of label-free sub-diffraction optical imaging. The transmission avalanche backlight (TAB) microscopy exploits huge optical non-linearities of photon avalanching materials, which are acting as a virtual near-field nano aperture - a diffraction limited backlight of the actual sample. Such approach enables to augment imaging contrast of highly transparent samples and thin layers, by translating small attenuation and scattering loses occurring on these translucent samples into amplified modulation of luminescence intensity of the avalanche backlighted substrate (ABS). At no additional cost, sub-diffraction imaging is achieved with simple, single beam laser scanning microscopy setup, leading to ca. 70 nm optical resolution. This far-field, label-free, raster scanning imaging technique, with augmented contrast and optical imaging resolution below diffraction limit, may become pivotal for studies in biology, physics, materials science, nanophotonics and nanoengineering

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.14667 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The principles behind Photon Avalanche (PA) and Transmission Avalanche Backlight microscopy (TAB). (a) General mechanisms leading to photon avalanche emission – absent GSA, efficient ESA resonant absorption and energy looping leads to (b) highly non-linear emission intensity dependence versus pump power intensity (PPD); (c) representative SEM image of photon avalanching 3%Tm3+ doped LiYF4 microcrystals, the foot for… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Simulations of TAB imaging with various samples types and rising non-linearity index. Cross￾section of the TAB image across the (a) thin layer with 3% attenuation, (b) multiple thin overlapping layers with attenuation of 2% each, (c) two nanoparticles with attenuation of 20% at various distances [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Simulations of pump power dependent PA emission intensity of the ABS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Okólna 2, Wroclaw 50-422, Poland

    Institute of Low Temperature and Structure Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Okólna 2, Wroclaw 50-422, Poland

    work page

  2. [2]

    Nanophotonics Group, Institute of Physics, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy and Informatics, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, ul. Grudziądzka 5, 87-100 Torun, Poland *E-mail: a.bednarkiewicz@intibs.pl ABSTRACT Optical imaging below the limit of light diffraction offers an unprecedented opportunity to study outlook, organization, interactions or in-si...

    work page 1979

  3. [3]

    & Xiao, J

    Coltharp, C. & Xiao, J. Superresolution microscopy for microbiology. Cell Microbiol 14, (2012)

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    & Weisshaar, J

    Bakshi, S., Siryaporn, A., Goulian, M. & Weisshaar, J. C. Superresolution imaging of ribosomes and RNA polymerase in live Escherichia coli cells. Mol Microbiol 85, (2012)

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    & Hell, S

    D’Este, E., Kamin, D., Göttfert, F., El-Hady, A. & Hell, S. W. STED Nanoscopy Reveals the Ubiquity of Subcortical Cytoskeleton Periodicity in Living Neurons. Cell Rep (2015) doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.007 2015

  6. [6]

    Kohl, T., Westphal, V., Hell, S. W. & Lehnart, S. E. Superresolution microscopy in heart - Cardiac nanoscopy. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology vol. 58 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2012.11.016 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.yjmcc.2012.11.016 2013

  7. [7]

    & Zhuang, X

    Dani, A., Huang, B., Bergan, J., Dulac, C. & Zhuang, X. Superresolution Imaging of Chemical Synapses in the Brain. Neuron 68, (2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Betzig, E. et al. Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution. Science (1979) 313, 1642–1645 (2006)

    work page 1979

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    McDonald, M., Trisnadi, J., Yao, K. X. & Chin, C. Superresolution Microscopy of Cold Atoms in an Optical Lattice. Phys Rev X 9, (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    & Landfester, K

    Busko, D., Baluschev, S., Crespy, D., Turshatov, A. & Landfester, K. New possibilities for materials science with STED microscopy. Micron 43, 583–588 (2012)

    2012

  3. [11]

    & Zhuang, X

    Huang, B., Bates, M. & Zhuang, X. Super-Resolution Fluorescence Microscopy. Annu Rev Biochem (2009) doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061906.092014

    2009 arXiv

  4. [12]

    & Leonhardt, H

    Schermelleh, L., Heintzmann, R. & Leonhardt, H. A guide to super-resolution fluorescence microscopy. Journal of Cell Biology 190, 165–175 (2010)

    2010

  5. [13]

    Balzarotti, F. et al. Nanometer resolution imaging and tracking of fluorescent molecules with minimal photon fluxes. Science (1979) 355, (2017)

    1979

  6. [14]

    J., Bates, M

    Rust, M. J., Bates, M. & Zhuang, X. Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM). Nat Methods 3, 793–796 (2006)

    2006

  7. [15]

    Hell, S. W. et al. The 2015 super-resolution microscopy roadmap. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics vol. 48 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/48/44/443001 (2015)

    2015 doi

  8. [16]

    M., Sengupta, P., Lippincott-Schwartz, J

    Shcherbakova, D. M., Sengupta, P., Lippincott-Schwartz, J. & Verkhusha, V. v. Photocontrollable fluorescent proteins for superresolution imaging. Annu Rev Biophys 43, (2014)

    2014

  9. [17]

    Dong, H., Sun, L. D. & Yan, C. H. Lanthanide-Doped Upconversion Nanoparticles for Super- Resolution Microscopy. Front Chem 8, (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    Jin, D. et al. Nanoparticles for super-resolution microscopy and single-molecule tracking. Nat Methods 15, 1–9 (2018)

    2018

  11. [19]

    Hanne, J. et al. STED nanoscopy with fluorescent quantum dots. Nat Commun 6, (2015)

    2015

  12. [20]

    Waters, J. C. Accuracy and precision in quantitative fluorescence microscopy. Journal of Cell Biology vol. 185 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200903097 (2009)

    2009 doi

  13. [21]

    Dong, H. et al. Lanthanide Nanoparticles: From Design toward Bioimaging and Therapy. Chem Rev 115, 10725–10815 (2015)

    2015

  14. [22]

    Liu, X., Yan, C. H. & Capobianco, J. A. Photon upconversion nanomaterials. Chem Soc Rev 44, 1299–1301 (2015)

    2015

  15. [23]

    & Diaspro, A

    Vicidomini, G., Bianchini, P. & Diaspro, A. STED super-resolved microscopy. Nature Methods Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4593 (2018)

    2018 doi

  16. [24]

    I., Harke, B., Medda, R

    Willig, K. I., Harke, B., Medda, R. & Hell, S. W. STED microscopy with continuous wave beams. Nat Methods 4, 915–918 (2007)

    2007

  17. [25]

    Chen, C. et al. Multi-photon near-infrared emission saturation nanoscopy using upconversion nanoparticles. Nat Commun 9, 4–9 (2018)

    2018

  18. [26]

    & Zhuang, X

    Huang, B., Wang, W., Bates, M. & Zhuang, X. Three-dimensional super-resolution imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy. Science (1979) 319, (2008)

    1979

  19. [27]

    Gustafsson, M. G. L. Surpassing the lateral resolution limit by a factor of two using structured illumination microscopy. J Microsc 198, 82–87 (2000)

    2000

  20. [28]

    Wei, F. et al. Wide field super-resolution surface imaging through plasmonic structured illumination microscopy. Nano Lett 14, (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    & Kaminski, C

    Ströhl, F. & Kaminski, C. F. Frontiers in structured illumination microscopy. Optica 3, (2016)

    2016

  22. [30]

    Lee, Y. U. et al. Organic Hyperbolic Material Assisted Illumination Nanoscopy. Advanced Science 8, (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Lee, Y. U. et al. Ultrathin Layered Hyperbolic Metamaterial-Assisted Illumination Nanoscopy. Nano Lett 22, 5916–5921 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Wildanger, D. et al. Solid immersion facilitates fluorescence microscopy with nanometer resolution and sub-Ångström emitter localization. Advanced Materials 24, (2012)

    2012

  25. [33]

    I., Derov, J

    Darafsheh, A., Limberopoulos, N. I., Derov, J. S., Walker, D. E. & Astratov, V. N. Advantages of microsphere-assisted super-resolution imaging technique over solid immersion lens and confocal microscopies. Appl Phys Lett 104, (2014)

    2014

  26. [34]

    E., Alperstein, A

    Leighton, R. E., Alperstein, A. M. & Frontiera, R. R. Label-Free Super-Resolution Imaging Techniques. Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) vol. 15 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anchem-061020-014723 (2022)

    2022 doi

  27. [35]

    (2019) doi:10.1007/978-3-030-21722-8

    Label-Free Super-Resolution Microscopy. (2019) doi:10.1007/978-3-030-21722-8

    2019 doi

  28. [36]

    Zheludev, N. I. & Yuan, G. Optical superoscillation technologies beyond the diffraction limit. Nature Reviews Physics vol. 4 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00382-7 (2022)

    2022 doi

  29. [37]

    Rogers, E. T. F. et al. Far-field unlabeled super-resolution imaging with superoscillatory illumination. APL Photonics 5, (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    Pu, T. et al. Unlabeled Far-Field Deeply Subwavelength Topological Microscopy (DSTM). Advanced Science 8, (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    Rogers, E. T. F. et al. A super-oscillatory lens optical microscope for subwavelength imaging. Nat Mater 11, (2012)

    2012

  32. [40]

    Jünger, F., Olshausen, P. v. & Rohrbach, A. Fast, label-free super-resolution live-cell imaging using rotating coherent scattering (ROCS) microscopy. Sci Rep 6, (2016)

    2016

  33. [41]

    J., Abbas, A., Upham, J

    Huttunen, M. J., Abbas, A., Upham, J. & Boyd, R. W. Label-free super-resolution with coherent nonlinear structured-illumination microscopy. Journal of Optics (United Kingdom) 19, (2017)

    2017

  34. [42]

    Qian, C. et al. Super-resolution label-free volumetric vibrational imaging. Nat Commun 12, (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    & Bon, P

    Aguilar, A., Boyreau, A. & Bon, P. Label-free super-resolution imaging below 90-nm using photon-reassignment. Open Research Europe 1, (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    Wang, P. et al. Far-field imaging of non-fluorescent species with subdiffraction resolution. Nat Photonics 7, (2013)

    2013

  37. [45]

    E., Haglund, R

    Tzang, O., Pevzner, A., Marvel, R. E., Haglund, R. F. & Cheshnovsky, O. Super-resolution in label-free photomodulated reflectivity. Nano Lett 15, (2015)

    2015

  38. [46]

    Stöhr, R. J. et al. Super-resolution fluorescence quenching microscopy of graphene. ACS Nano 6, (2012)

    2012

  39. [47]

    Wang, P. et al. Far-field imaging of non-fluorescent species with subdiffraction resolution. Nature Photonics 2013 7:6 7, 449–453 (2013)

    2013

  40. [48]

    R., Graefe, C

    Silva, W. R., Graefe, C. T. & Frontiera, R. R. Toward Label-Free Super-Resolution Microscopy. ACS Photonics 3, (2016)

    2016

  41. [49]

    S., Case, W

    Chivian, J. S., Case, W. E. & Eden, D. D. The photon avalanche: A new phenomenon in Pr 3+ ‐ based infrared quantum counters. Appl Phys Lett 35, 124–125 (1979)

    1979

  42. [50]

    Joubert, M.-F. F. Photon avalanche upconversion in rare earth laser materials. Opt Mater (Amst) 11, 181–203 (1999)

    1999

  43. [51]

    F., Guy, S., Jacquier, B

    Joubert, M. F., Guy, S., Jacquier, B. & Linarés, C. The photon-avalanche effect: review, model and application. Opt Mater (Amst) 4, 43–49 (1994)

    1994

  44. [52]

    Szalkowski, M. et al. Advances in the photon avalanche luminescence of inorganic lanthanide- doped nanomaterials. Chem Soc Rev 54, 983–1026 (2025)

    2025

  45. [54]

    Liang, Y. et al. Migrating photon avalanche in different emitters at the nanoscale enables 46th-order optical nonlinearity. Nature Nanotechnology 2022 1–7 (2022) doi:10.1038/s41565- 022-01101-8

    2022 doi

  46. [55]

    & Qiao, S

    Dong, H., Guan, L.-Q. & Qiao, S. Parallel photon avalanche nanoparticles for tuneable emission and multicolour sub-diffraction microscopy. Nat Photonics (2025)

    2025

  47. [56]

    Dudek, M. et al. Size-Dependent Photon Avalanching in Tm3+ Doped LiYF4 Nano, Micro, and Bulk Crystals. Adv Opt Mater 2201052 (2022) doi:10.1002/ADOM.202201052

    2022 doi

  48. [57]

    Liu, X. et al. Extreme Optical Nonlinearity (> 500) at Room Temperature through Sublattice Reconstruction. https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-4183918/v1 (2024)

    2024

  49. [58]

    Lee, C. et al. Indefinite and Bidirectional Near Infrared Nanocrystal Photoswitching. Nature 618, 951–958 (2023)

    2023

  50. [59]

    Bednarkiewicz, A. et al. All-Optical Data Processing with Photon-Avalanching Nanocrystalline Photonic Synapse. Advanced Materials 35, 2304390 (2023)

    2023

  51. [60]

    Fardian-Melamed, N. et al. Infrared nanosensors of piconewton to micronewton forces. Nature 637, 70–75 (2025)

    2025

  52. [61]

    Korczak, Z. et al. Sensitized photon avalanche nanothermometry in Pr3+ and Yb3+ co-doped NaYF4 colloidal nanoparticles. Low Temperature Physics 49, 322 (2023)

    2023

  53. [62]

    Bednarkiewicz, A., Chan, E. M.-Y. E. M. E. M., Kotulska, A. M., Marciniak, L. & Prorok, K. Photon avalanche in lanthanide doped nanoparticles for biomedical applications: super- resolution imaging. Nanoscale Horiz 4, 881–889 (2019)

    2019

  54. [63]

    & Bednarkiewicz, A

    Majak, M., Misiak, M. & Bednarkiewicz, A. The mechanisms behind extreme susceptibility of photon avalanche emission to quenching. Materials Horizon 11, 4791–801 (2024)

    2024

  55. [64]

    Szalkowski, M. et al. Predicting the impact of temperature dependent multi-phonon relaxation processes on the photon avalanche behavior in Tm3+: NaYF4 nanoparticles. Optical Materials: X 12, 100102 (2021)

    2021

  56. [65]

    Clarke, C. et al. Mono- to few-layer non-van der Waals 2D lanthanide-doped NaYF 4 nanosheets with upconversion luminescence. 2d Mater 8, 015005 (2021)

    2021

  57. [66]

    & Pickel, A

    Ye, Z., Harrington, B. & Pickel, A. D. Optical super-resolution nanothermometry via stimulated emission depletion imaging of upconverting nanoparticles. Sci Adv 10, (2024)

    2024

  58. [67]

    Denkova, D. et al. 3D sub-diffraction imaging in a conventional confocal configuration by exploiting super-linear emitters. Nat Commun 10, 1–12 (2019)

    2019

  59. [68]

    Liu, Y. et al. Amplified stimulated emission in upconversion nanoparticles for super-resolution nanoscopy. Nature 543, 229–233 (2017)

    2017

  60. [69]

    Levy, E. S. et al. Energy-Looping Nanoparticles: Harnessing Excited-State Absorption for Deep- Tissue Imaging. ACS Nano 10, 8423–8433 (2016)

    2016

  61. [70]

    Lee, C. et al. Giant nonlinear optical responses from photon-avalanching nanoparticles. Nature 589, 230–235 (2021)

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.