Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Effective dynamics of open 2D CFTs

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper computes the thermal four-point response function of identical scalar primaries in any 2D CFT in momentum space, as an infinite convergent series of Meijer G-functions (Eq. 3.52).

desk verdict Provides the first momentum-space thermal four-point response for generic 2D CFTs; the derivation is plausible though some steps are sketched, and the specific factorization concern from the stress test does not survive re-derivation. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.15165 v2 pith:GSCE6QIS submitted 2025-07-21 hep-th

Lorenzo Toni This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords openquantumsystems2Dconformalfieldtheorythermalfour-pointfunctionresponsefunctionsmomentumspaceglobalblocksMeijerG-functionsSchwinger-Keldyshformalism
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to supply the missing momentum-space expression for the thermal four-point response function of scalar primaries in an arbitrary 2D CFT. That object is what an open quantum system needs, at fourth order in the coupling, when the environment is a finite-temperature CFT and one works in the Schwinger-Keldysh formalism. The author shows that, of the available conformal-block representations, only the global-block expansion can be carried through analytic continuation to the relevant time-ordered Lorentzian correlators and then Fourier-transformed explicitly. The resulting formula is an infinite series over OPE data and an integer $n$ of products of Meijer G-functions, with a convergent residue structure that exposes physical poles. If correct, it completes the perturbative influence functional of an open 2D CFT to fourth order and gives a concrete entry point for holographic and Ising-model applications.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the $s$-channel global conformal block expansion of the four-point function, with blocks written as hypergeometric functions $f(h,h_\phi;z)=z^h {}_2F_1(h,h,2h;z)$. Its Mellin-Barnes representation gives a contour integral over $s$ that, after inserting the Lorentzian cross ratios (3.39) and delta-function changes of variables, converts the thermal Fourier integral into a product of Gamma functions with an auxiliary frequency $\omega$. Closing the $\omega$ contour in the lower half-plane selects residues at four infinite families of poles (3.51), and the remaining $s$-integral produces the Meijer G-functions $A_i$. The chiral factorization $\rho_{raaa}(p_1,p_2,p_3)=\mathrm{const}\,\sum_{h,\bar h}C^2(h_\phi;h,\bar h)\,\frac{\Gamma(2h)}{\Gamma^2(h)}\frac{\Gamma(2\bar h)}{\Gamma^2(\bar h)}\,\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{(-1)^n}{n!}\sum_{i=1}^4 A_i(p^-;h,n)A_i(p^+;\bar h,n)$ is the form that makes the result usable.

What would settle it

Evaluate the Lorentzian cross ratios (3.39) for each of the six time orderings used in Eq. (3.42): if any of them produces a real cross ratio $z$ or $\bar z$ in $[1,+\infty)$, the $s$-channel expansion is not valid for that configuration and the formula is unjustified. Alternatively, numerically Fourier transform the exact finite-temperature Ising four-point function and compare with the specialized series (4.5); a mismatch in the location of any pole in the external momenta would falsify the residue resummation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is the evaluation of the Fourier transform of the thermal four-point response function $G^{raaa}$ for identical scalar primaries in an arbitrary 2D CFT. Starting from the Euclidean correlator and the $s$-channel global conformal block expansion, whose blocks are the hypergeometric functions $z^h {}_2F_1(h,h,2h;z)$, the author continues each block to the Lorentzian time-ordered configuration, inserts the light-cone cross ratios, and evaluates the position-space integral with a Mellin-Barnes representation of the hypergeometric function plus a residue computation over an auxiliary frequency. The outcome, Eq. (3.52), writes the momentum-space spectral function as a sum over the squared OPE coefficients $C^2(h_\phi;h,\bar h)$ and over an integer $n$ of products of four Meijer G-function factors, one pair for left- and one for right-moving light-cone momenta; the integer sum is absolutely convergent because of factorial suppression at large $n$. The paper also specializes the general formula to the Ising model, where the only non-trivial identical-operator block is that of the thermal operator $\epsilon$, and reads off the explicit pole conditions (3.57).

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise, stated in Sections 3.3.1 and 3.3.2, is that each term of the operator-product expansion can be continued one by one to the relevant real-time configurations without a cross ratio crossing the branch cut where the expansion stops converging, and that the order of summation and integration can be freely swapped; if either fails, Eq. (3.52) loses its justification.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The two-, three- and four-point causal response functions are now all explicit in momentum space, so the perturbative influence functional of an open 2D CFT can be written through fourth order in the coupling $g$.
  • Because the answer factorizes by light-cone chirality and is a convergent sum over the CFT data, any theory with known OPE data can be inserted directly; the paper demonstrates this with the Ising model.
  • The pole conditions (3.57) make the relaxation spectrum of the open system explicit in momentum space, connecting dissipative real-time dynamics to the quasinormal-mode structure of the holographic dual.
  • The same global-block strategy can in principle be applied to non-identical or spinning primaries and to higher-order $n$-point correlators, producing similarly structured momentum-space expressions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same derivation could be repeated in the $t$- or $u$-channel, producing a second momentum-space expression; requiring crossing symmetry between the two series would give a quantitative constraint on the OPE coefficients $C^2(h_\phi;h,\bar h)$ that has no direct position-space analogue.
  • The exact position-space Ising four-point function (4.4) provides a clean numerical test: Fourier transforming its finite-temperature version and comparing with the series (3.52)-(3.56) at the Ising data would expose any error in the residue computation or the continuation.
  • If a causal configuration relevant to (3.42) ever forces a cross ratio onto the branch cut, the global-block formula would fail; that failure would appear as spurious or divergent terms in the $n$-sum, so the convergence of the series itself is a diagnostic of the paper's domain of validity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops momentum-space expressions for thermal causal response functions of scalar primary operators in arbitrary 2D CFTs, as ingredients for a Schwinger-Keldysh influence functional of an open CFT. The two- and three-point results are extensions of known integrals. The main claim is Eq. (3.52): an infinite sum, over global conformal blocks and an integer n, of products of Meijer G-functions, for the momentum-space four-point response function. The derivation uses the global conformal block expansion on the thermal cylinder, Mellin-Barnes representations, and a contour-residue evaluation. The paper closes with an Ising-model specialization. The central result is new if the analytic-continuation steps are valid.

Significance. If correct, Eq. (3.52) fills a concrete gap: momentum-space four-point thermal response functions of 2D CFTs, which are needed for fourth-order influence functionals in open CFTs and for comparisons with holographic quasinormal-mode computations. The paper is honest about the limitations of global blocks and does not fit parameters; the final formula is an explicit, checkable prediction. I also checked the factorization in Eq. (3.49) against a direct Fourier-transform computation: the apparent mismatch of Gamma-function arguments is resolved by the evenness F_X(q)=F_X(-q), so that particular stress-test concern does not land. The main reservations are the unproved analytic-continuation and interchange steps described below.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.3.1, Eqs. (3.39)-(3.42)] The paper asserts that time-ordered configurations avoid the branch cut [1,+∞) and that only OTO configurations cross it. This is not correct for configurations entering the Fourier integral (3.44). For example, take t=(1,2,3,4), x^-=(0,5,1,7), x^+=(2,-1,5,1); these are real points with strict time ordering, but the cross ratios computed from (3.39) satisfy z^- = sinh(5)sinh(6)/(sinh(1)sinh(2)) > 1 and z^+ = sinh(3)sinh(4)/(sinh(3)sinh(2)) > 1. Hence the term-by-term global-block continuation used in (3.41) is not valid for all configurations over which the four-point Fourier transform is integrated, and the derivation of (3.52) needs an additional argument, such as analytic continuation in the external momenta or a distributional justification for the cut-crossing region.
  2. [§3.3.2, Eqs. (3.44)-(3.52)] The derivation interchanges the OPE sum over h and \bar h with the position-space integrals, the Mellin-Barnes s-integral (3.47), and the residue sum over n without presenting conditions. The large-n convergence heuristic after (3.52) concerns only the final series and does not justify these interchanges, especially because individual global blocks are not absolutely integrable for all real kinematics. Please supply a dominated-convergence or contour-deformation argument, or state the domain of external momenta on which (3.52) is proven.
  3. [§3.3.2, Eq. (3.42)] The step from the causal-basis definition (2.15) to the compact expression (3.42) is not shown. The nested commutator contains Wightman functions with all 24 orderings, and the analytic continuations of the non-fully-time-ordered orderings are not described; the equality of the sum over σ with equal coefficients and the prefactor 8i sin(3πhφ) sin(2πhφ) sin(πhφ) therefore needs an explicit derivation. Without this, the spectral function ρraaa extracted in (3.44) is not established.
  4. [Eqs. (3.49)-(3.56)] After listing the four pole families in (3.51), the text asserts that computing residues and performing the s-integral yields (3.52). I could not reproduce this step from the displayed equations: the Mellin-Barnes contour for (3.47) must separate the pole sequences of Γ(-s) from those of Γ(2h+s), and the ω-residue sum shifts the effective s-poles by n-dependent terms. The mapping of the resulting integrals to the Meijer G-functions in (3.53)-(3.56) should be shown, or a computer-readable derivation should be provided.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eqs. (3.40)-(3.41)] The argument list w^(4)_β(y1,y2,y4,y4) should be w^(4)_β(y1,y2,y3,y4); the same typo appears in the display before (3.41).
  2. [Eqs. (3.9)-(3.11)] The notation for the two-point spectral function is confusing: ρra is defined with two momenta, and then fixing y2=0 yields a function of a single p. Please clarify that the Fourier transform is taken after fixing one point and define the reduced function explicitly.
  3. [Eqs. (3.13), (3.26), (3.57)] The pole conditions use both N and N0 inconsistently; for example (3.13) uses N0 while (3.26) and (3.57) use N. Please unify the notation.
  4. [Eq. (4.5)] The factor (2π)^δ in the disconnected term is not defined; since δ=± labels light-cone components, this notation is confusing and should be written explicitly as a product over the two components.
  5. [References] Reference [50] should read Haag rather than Haang, and reference [56] has JHEp instead of JHEP.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the four-point momentum-space result is a direct computation whose inputs are standard conformal-block data and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central result, Eq. (3.52), is obtained by taking the position-space global conformal block expansion (3.37), analytically continuing it to the time-ordered configuration, introducing the Mellin-Barnes representation (3.47), and then evaluating the Fourier integral. The target quantity, the four-point spectral function, is not used as an input anywhere in the derivation, and no parameter is fitted to any subset of data and then called a prediction. The causal-basis and retarded/advanced representations are cited from [28], [17], [18], and [51], and these are framework results used to organize the response function; the actual four-point computation in Section 3.3.2 is an independent calculation from the OPE data. A possible algebraic issue in the factorization leading to Eq. (3.49) would be a correctness concern, not a circularity concern, because it does not make the output equivalent to an input by construction. Accordingly, no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The computation uses standard conformal block data, OPE convergence, KMS relations and i-epsilon analytic continuation as inputs. The main additional assumption is that the s-channel global block expansion can be analytically continued term by term to the relevant Lorentzian causal configurations and that sums can be interchanged with integrals.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math i-epsilon analytic continuation recovers Wightman functions as boundary values of Euclidean Schwinger functions (3.5)-(3.6).
    Standard QFT continuation prescription, cited from [32,50].
  • domain assumption KMS relations and the causal basis of nested commutators characterize thermal response functions (2.10)-(2.15).
    Taken from [28]; used to define G_ra, G_raa and G_raaa.
  • ad hoc to paper Global conformal block expansion of the four-point function converges and can be analytically continued term by term for the relevant time-ordered configurations, avoiding the [1,+infty) cut.
    Central assumption of Section 3.3.1; the paper argues it is the only tractable representation but does not prove the required convergence or exchange properties for the causal configurations.
  • domain assumption OPE decomposition of the four-point function remains valid on the thermal cylinder (3.37).
    Invoked at Eq. (3.37) with citation [35]; finite-temperature OPE convergence is assumed.
  • ad hoc to paper Interchange of the conformal block sum, momentum integrals, Mellin-Barnes contour, and residue sum over n in (3.44)-(3.52) is valid.
    Needed for (3.52); only the n-series convergence is argued asymptotically, not the block sum convergence or integral interchanges.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effective dynamics of open 2D CFTs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GSCE6QIS

@misc{pith2026250715165,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effective dynamics of open 2D CFTs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GSCE6QIS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.15165}
}
read the original abstract

We analyze the momentum-space representations of causal response functions of scalar primary operators in an arbitrary 2D CFT, which can be exploited to characterize the effective dynamics of open quantum CFTs. We derive our results by analytically continuing Euclidean correlators to Lorentzian signature. While the two- and three-point functions can be continued straightforwardly, the case of the four-point function is more challenging. In principle, the analytic continuation of the four-point function can be performed in full generality using either the Virasoro conformal block expansion or by mapping the conformal blocks to radial coordinates. However, these frameworks are mathematically intractable for explicit momentum-space calculations. We argue that the global block expansion offers a valuable alternative, as it allows us to recover the time-ordered correlators while preserving a relatively simple analytic structure. From these causal configurations, the four-point response function is systematically constructed and its momentum-space representation is evaluated.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Exact Lindbladian Dynamics from Conformal Embeddings and Topological Defects in Conformal Field Theory

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Conformal embeddings and Verlinde defect lines make adjoint Lindbladians triangular or diagonal on natural CFT operator spaces, yielding exact open dynamics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [44]

    Loganayagam, M

    R. Loganayagam, M. Rangamani and J. Virrueta,Holographic open quantum systems: toy models and analytic properties of thermal correlators,JHEP03(2023) 153 [2211.07683 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2023

  2. [1]

    Feynman and F

    R. Feynman and F. Vernon,The theory of a general quantum system interacting with a linear dissipative system,Annals Phys.24(1963) 118

    work page 1963

  3. [2]

    Caldeira and A

    A. Caldeira and A. Leggett,Path integral approach to quantum Brownian motion,Physica A 121(1983) 587

    work page 1983

  4. [3]

    Zurek,Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical,Rev.Mod.Phys

    W.H. Zurek,Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical,Rev.Mod.Phys. 75(2003) 715 [quant-ph/0105127]

    arXiv 2003

  5. [4]

    Grozdanov and J

    S. Grozdanov and J. Polonyi,Viscosity and dissipative hydrodynamics from effective field theory,Phys.Rev.D91(2015) 10 [1305.3670 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2015

  6. [5]

    Boyanovsky,Effective Field Theory out of Equilibrium: Brownian quantum fields,New J.Phys.17(2015) 6 [1503.00156 [hep-ph]]

    D. Boyanovsky,Effective Field Theory out of Equilibrium: Brownian quantum fields,New J.Phys.17(2015) 6 [1503.00156 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2015

  7. [6]

    Baidya, C

    A. Baidya, C. Jana, R. Loganayagam and A. Rudra,Renormalization in open quantum field theory. Part I. Scalar field theory,JHEP11(2017) 204 [1704.08335 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2017

  8. [7]

    Boyanovsky,Information loss in effective field theory: entanglement and thermal entropies, Phys.Rev.D97(2018) 6 [1801.06840 [hep-th]]

    D. Boyanovsky,Information loss in effective field theory: entanglement and thermal entropies, Phys.Rev.D97(2018) 6 [1801.06840 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2018

Show all 62 references
  1. [8]

    Ag´ on and A

    C. Ag´ on and A. Lawrence,Divergences in open quantum systems,JHEP04(2018) 008 [1709.10095 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Schwinger,Brownian motion of a quantum oscillator,J.Math.Phys.2(1961) 407

    J.S. Schwinger,Brownian motion of a quantum oscillator,J.Math.Phys.2(1961) 407

    1961

  3. [10]

    Keldysh,Diagram Technique for Nonequilibrium Processes,Sov.Phys.JETP20(1965) 1018

    L. Keldysh,Diagram Technique for Nonequilibrium Processes,Sov.Phys.JETP20(1965) 1018

    1965

  4. [11]

    Landsman and C

    N. Landsman and C. van Weert,Real and Imaginary Time Field Theory at Finite Temperature and Density,Phys.Rept.145(1987) 141

    1987

  5. [12]

    Chou, Z.-b

    K.-c. Chou, Z.-b. Su, B.-l. Hao and L. Yu,Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Formalisms Made Unified,Phys.Rept.118(1985) 1

    1985

  6. [13]

    Breuer and F

    H. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The theory of open quantum systems, Oxford University Press (2002)

    2002

  7. [14]

    Kamenev and A

    A. Kamenev and A. Levchenko,Keldysh technique and nonlinear sigma-model: Basic principles and applications,Adv.Phys.58(2009) 197 [0901.3586 [cond-mat.other]]

    2009 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Kamenev,Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems, Cambridge University Press (2011)

    A. Kamenev,Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems, Cambridge University Press (2011)

    2011

  9. [16]

    Sieberer and S

    L. Sieberer and S. Diehl,Keldysh Field Theory for Driven Open Quantum Systems, Rept.Prog.Phys.79(2016) 9 [1512.00637 [cond-mat.quant-gas]]

    2016 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Haehl, R

    F.M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam and M. Rangamani,Schwinger-Keldysh formalism I: BRST symmetries and superspace,JHEP06(2017) 069 [1610.01940 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Haehl, R

    F.M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam and M. Rangamani,Schwinger-Keldysh formalism. Part II: thermal equivariant cohomology,JHEP06(2017) 070 [1610.01941 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Gillioz, X

    M. Gillioz, X. Lu, M.A. Luty and G. Mikaberidze,Convergent Momentum-Space OPE and Bootstrap Equations in Conformal Field Theory,JHEP03(2020) 102 [1912.05550 [hep-th]]. – 23 –

    2020 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Gillioz, X

    M. Gillioz, X. Lu, M.A. Luty and G. Mikaberidze,Conformal 3-point functions and the Lorentzian OPE in momentum space,Commun.Math.Phys.379(2020) 227 [1909.00878 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Gillioz,Conformal partial waves in momentum space,SciPost Phys.10(2021) 4 [2012.09825 [hep-th]]

    M. Gillioz,Conformal partial waves in momentum space,SciPost Phys.10(2021) 4 [2012.09825 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Gillioz,The momentum-space conformal bootstrap in 2d,2502.21227 [hep-th]

    M. Gillioz,The momentum-space conformal bootstrap in 2d,2502.21227 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  16. [23]

    Bautista and H

    T. Bautista and H. Godazgar,Lorentzian CFT 3-point functions in momentum space,JHEP01 (2020) 142 [1908.04733 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Son and A

    D. Son and A. Starinets,Minkowski space correlators in AdS / CFT correspondence: Recipe and applications,JHEP09(2002) 042 [hep-th/0205051]

    2002 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Becker, Y

    M. Becker, Y. Cabrera and N. Su,Finite-temperature three-point function in 2D CFT,JHEP 09(2014) 157 [1407.3415 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Martin and J

    P.C. Martin and J. Schwinger,Theory of Many-Particle Systems. I,Phys. Rev.115(1959) 1342–1373

    1959

  20. [27]

    Kubo,Statistical mechanical theory of irreversible processes

    R. Kubo,Statistical mechanical theory of irreversible processes. 1. General theory and simple applications in magnetic and conduction problems,J.Phys.Soc.Jap.12(1957) 570

    1957

  21. [28]

    Haehl, R

    F. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, P. Narayan, A.A. Nizami and M. Rangamani,Thermal out-of-time-order correlators, KMS relations, and spectral functions,JHEP12(2017) 154 [1706.08956 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Gransee, N

    M. Gransee, N. Pinamonti and R. Verch,KMS-like Properties of Local Equilibrium States in Quantum Field Theory,J.Geom.Phys.117(2017) 215 [1508.05585 [math-ph]]

    2017 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Haehl, R

    F.M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, P. Narayan and M. Rangamani,Classification of out-of-time-order correlators,SciPost Phys.6(2019) 1 [1701.02820 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  24. [31]

    R. Haag, N. Hugenholtz and M. Winnink,On the Equilibrium states in quantum statistical mechanics,Commun.Math.Phys.5(1967) 215

    1967

  25. [32]

    Hartman, S

    T. Hartman, S. Jain and S. Kundu,Causality Constraints in Conformal Field Theory,JHEP5 (2016) 99 [1509.00014 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Zamolodchikov,Conformal symmetry in two-dimensional space: Recursion representation of conformal block,Theor.Math.Phys.73(1987) 1

    A.B. Zamolodchikov,Conformal symmetry in two-dimensional space: Recursion representation of conformal block,Theor.Math.Phys.73(1987) 1

    1987

  27. [34]

    Hogervorst and R

    M. Hogervorst and R. S.,Radial coordinates for conformal blocks,Physical Review D87(2013) [1303.1111 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Pappadopulo, S

    D. Pappadopulo, S. Rychkov, J. Espin and R. Rattazzi,OPE Convergence in Conformal Field Theory,Phys.Rev.D86(2012) [1208.6449 [hep-th]]

    2012 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Perlmutter,Virasoro conformal blocks in closed form,JHEP8(2015) 15 [1502.07742 [hep-th]]

    E. Perlmutter,Virasoro conformal blocks in closed form,JHEP8(2015) 15 [1502.07742 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Maldacena, D

    J. Maldacena, D. Simmons-Duffin and A. Zhiboedov,Looking for a bulk point,JHEP01(2017) 013 [1509.03612 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Fitzpatrick and J

    A.L. Fitzpatrick and J. Kaplan,On the Late-Time Behavior of Virasoro Blocks and a Classification of Semiclassical Saddles,JHEP04(2017) 072 [1609.07153 [hep-th]]. – 24 –

    2017 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Chang, D.M

    C.-M. Chang, D.M. Ramirez and M. Rangamani,Spinning constraints on chaotic large c CFTs, JHEP03(2019) 068 [1812.05585 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Kravchuk, J

    P. Kravchuk, J. Qiao and S. Rychkov,Distributions in CFT. Part I. Cross-ratio space,JHEP 05(2020) 137 [2001.08778 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Kravchuk, J

    P. Kravchuk, J. Qiao and S. Rychkov,Distributions in CFT. Part II. Minkowski space,JHEP 08(2021) 094 [2104.02090 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Qiao,On the Wick rotation of the Four-point functions in Conformal Field Theory, 2209.00285 [hep-th]

    J. Qiao,On the Wick rotation of the Four-point functions in Conformal Field Theory, 2209.00285 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  36. [43]

    Dolan and H

    F. Dolan and H. Osborn,Conformal Four Point Functions and Operator Porduct Expansion, Nucl.Phys. B599(2000) 459 [hep-th/0011040]

    2000 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Horowitz and V.E

    G.T. Horowitz and V.E. Hubeny,Quasinormal modes of AdS black holes and the approach to thermal equilibrium,Phys.Rev.D62(2000) [hep-th/9909056]

    2000 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Birmingham, I

    D. Birmingham, I. Sachs and S. Solodukhin,Conformal field theory interpretation of black hole quasinormal modes,Phys.Rev.Lett.88(2002) [hep-th/0112055]

    2002 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Chandan, R

    J. Chandan, R. Loganayagam and M. Rangamani,Open quantum systems and Schwinger-Keldysh holograms,JHEP07(2020) 242 [2004.02888 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Pelliconi and J

    P. Pelliconi and J. Sonner,The Influence Functional in open holography: entanglement and Renyi entropies,JHEP06(2024) 185 [2310.13047 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Reyes-Osorio, F

    F. Reyes-Osorio, F. Garcia-Gaitan, D.J. Strachan, P. Plechac and S.R. Clark, Schwinger–Keldysh nonperturbative field theory of open quantum systems beyond the Markovian regime: application to spin-boson and spin-chain-boson models,Rept.Prog.Phys.89(2026) 1 [2405.00765 [quant-ph]]

    2026

  42. [50]

    Haang,Local Quantum Physics: Fields, Particles, Algebras, Springer (1992)

    R. Haang,Local Quantum Physics: Fields, Particles, Algebras, Springer (1992)

    1992

  43. [51]

    Chaudhuri, C

    S. Chaudhuri, C. Chowdhury and R. Loganayagam,Spectral Representation of Thermal OTO Correlators,JHEP2(2019) 18 [1810.03118 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Gubser,Absorption of photons and fermions by black holes in four dimensions,Phys.Rev.D 56(1997) 7854 [hep-th/9706100]

    S. Gubser,Absorption of photons and fermions by black holes in four dimensions,Phys.Rev.D 56(1997) 7854 [hep-th/9706100]

    1997 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Manenti,Thermal CFTs in momentum space,JHEP01(2020) 009 [1905.01355 [hep-th]]

    A. Manenti,Thermal CFTs in momentum space,JHEP01(2020) 009 [1905.01355 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  46. [54]

    NIST,NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions,https://dlmf.nist.gov/(Release 1.2.3 of 2025-03-15)

    2025

  47. [55]

    Poland, S

    D. Poland, S. Rychkov and A. Vichi,The Conformal Bootstrap: Theory, Numerical Techniques, and Applications,Rev.Mod.Phys.91(2019) 015002 [1805.04405 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Iliesiu, M

    L. Iliesiu, M. Kolo˘ glu, R. Mahajan, E. Perlmutter and D. Simmons-Duffin,The Conformal Bootstrap at Finite Temperature,JHEp10(2018) 070 [1802.10266 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Roberts and D

    D.A. Roberts and D. Stanford,Two-dimensional conformal field theory and the butterfly effect, Phys.Rev.Lett.115(2015) [1412.5123 [hep-th]]. – 25 –

    2015 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Maldacena, S.H

    J. Maldacena, S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford,A bound on chaos,JHEP08(2016) 106 [1503.01409 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Qiao,Classification of Convergent OPE Channels for Lorentzian CFT Four-Point Functions, SciPost Phys.13(2022) 4 [2005.09105 [hep-th]]

    J. Qiao,Classification of Convergent OPE Channels for Lorentzian CFT Four-Point Functions, SciPost Phys.13(2022) 4 [2005.09105 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Costa, V.D.F

    M.S. Costa, V.D.F. Gon¸ calves and J. Penedones,Conformal Regge theory,JHEp12(2012) 091 [1209.4355 [hep-th]]

    2012 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Polchinski,String theory

    J. Polchinski,String theory. Vol. 1: An introduction to the bosonic string, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (2007)

    2007

  54. [62]

    Mathieu, D

    P. Mathieu, D. S´ en´ echal and P. Di Francesco,Conformal Field Theory, Springer (1997). – 26 –

    1997

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.