Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Equatorial light bending around a Hairy Kiselev Black Hole

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that equatorial light deflection in a Hairy Kiselev black hole admits an exact elliptic-integral formula in which scalar hair suppresses bending and quintessence enhances it.

desk verdict The exact bending-angle formula is built on a cubic factorization that fails Vieta's relations already in the α=0 limit, and the photon-sphere derivation uses an expansion outside its stated domain. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.15298 v1 pith:WIDDFR3V submitted 2025-07-21 gr-qc

Shrishti Kukreti , Shubham Kala , Hemwati Nandan , Faizuddin Ahmed , Saswati Roy This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc PACS 04.70.-s95.30.Sf98.62.Sb
keywords GeneralRelativityBlackHoleQuintessenceDarkMatterGravitationalLensingDeflectionAngleEllipticIntegralsPhotonSphere
topics Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish an exact, closed-form expression for how much a light ray is bent when it passes near a black hole whose spacetime is the Hairy Kiselev solution, a Schwarzschild-like geometry modified by a quintessence field and a scalar exponential hair term. Working in the equatorial plane and choosing the state parameter $\omega = -2/3$, the authors reduce the null-geodesic bending integral to elliptic integrals of the first kind and claim the deflection angle is analytic. They further claim that the scalar hair coupling $\alpha$ suppresses light bending in the strong-field regime, while the quintessence parameter $N$ enhances it. If correct, the formula gives a direct analytic lensing observable for modified-gravity black holes and connects cleanly to the known Kiselev and Schwarzschild limits.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the factorization of the photon path equation into a cubic, $B(u) = 2M(u-u_1)(u-u_2)(u-u_3)$ with $u=1/r$, whose roots $u_3 > u_2 > u_1$ are taken real after the linear-hair approximation. The bending integral is split at the turning points and re-expressed with standard substitutions as a difference of two incomplete elliptic integrals of the first kind, collapsing to the combination $K(k) - F(\Psi,k)$ in Eq. (42). The elliptic modulus $k$ and phase $\Psi$ encode the black-hole mass, the quintessence strength $N$, and the hair parameters $\alpha,\ell$, and the same reduction is what lets the authors compare their formula with earlier Kiselev and Schwarzschild strong-deflection results.

What would settle it

Pick parameter values used in Figs. 7-9 and compute the deflection angle by numerically integrating Eq. (34) with the full metric function $f(r) = 1 - 2M/r - N r^{3\omega+1} + \alpha e^{-r/(M-\alpha\ell/2)}$, then compare with Eq. (42); a disagreement beyond numerical error would falsify the closed form as an exact statement about the original spacetime. A simpler check is whether the photon-sphere radius from Eq. (16) actually satisfies $r < M - \alpha\ell/2$ for the plotted parameters.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Eq. (42): for a photon moving in the equatorial plane of the Hairy Kiselev black hole, the deflection angle equals an expression built from the incomplete and complete elliptic integrals of the first kind, $F(\Psi,k)$ and $K(k)$, with the modulus and phase given by Eqs. (40) and (41). The derivation assumes that the photon-sphere radius and the polynomial roots $u_1,u_2,u_3$ come from the cubic obtained by linearizing the exponential hair term $\alpha e^{-r/(M-\alpha\ell/2)}$ to $1-\gamma r$, with $\gamma = 2/(2M-\alpha\ell)$. The paper argues that the resulting angle decreases with increasing impact parameter, decreases with increasing $\alpha$, and increases with increasing quintessence strength $N$, and that it reduces to the Kiselev result at $\alpha=0$ and to the Schwarzschild result at $\alpha=N=0$.

Load-bearing premise

The entire analytic bending formula relies on replacing the exponential scalar-hair term in the metric by its linear Taylor approximation to locate the photon sphere and the roots of the path equation, even though that approximation is declared valid only for $r < M - \alpha\ell/2$ while the photon sphere sits near $r = 3M$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • An exact analytic deflection formula for the Hairy Kiselev spacetime is available, so lensing observables can be computed without numerical integration of the geodesic equation.
  • In the strong-field regime, larger scalar hair coupling $\alpha$ reduces light bending, so a given image separation implies a heavier inferred mass than Schwarzschild lensing would suggest.
  • The quintessence parameter $N$ enhances deflection and partly counteracts the hair's suppression, so the two effects could in principle be disentangled by combining photon-sphere and shadow observables.
  • Known limits are reproduced: $\alpha=0$ returns the Kiselev bending angle and $\alpha=N=0$ returns the Schwarzschild result, providing internal consistency checks.
  • Negative deflection angles appear in some parameter regimes, which the paper interprets as repulsive photon trajectories produced by the combined scalar hair and exotic background field.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct numerical integration of the bending integral using the full exponential metric, rather than its linearized replacement, would show whether the claimed $\alpha$-suppression and $N$-enhancement trends survive for photons whose closest approach sits near $r\approx 3M$, where the expansion's validity condition $r < M - \alpha\ell/2$ fails.
  • The same elliptic-integral reduction should extend to other equation-of-state parameters; for $\omega=-1$ and $\omega=-4/3$, where the horizon analysis shows two horizons, the path polynomial has a different degree and hyperelliptic integrals are likely needed.
  • The critical impact parameter in Eq. (21) defines a shadow radius, and comparing that shadow size with current black-hole shadow measurements would convert the paper's qualitative trends into quantitative upper bounds on $\alpha$ and $N$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies equatorial null geodesics in the Hairy Kiselev spacetime of Ref. [93], specializing to the equation-of-state parameter ω=-2/3. It derives the effective potential, photon-sphere radius, critical impact parameter, and a relation between the closest-approach distance and the impact parameter, and then expresses the deflection angle as a difference of incomplete elliptic integrals in Eq. (42). The paper claims that the result reduces to the Kiselev and Schwarzschild limits and uses plots to argue that the scalar hair coupling α suppresses the deflection while the quintessence parameter N enhances it.

Significance. If Eq. (42) were correct, it would provide a compact analytic lensing observable for a modified black-hole geometry and would make the qualitative trends in α and N useful for strong-lensing studies. The paper correctly avoids fitting free parameters to data and attempts to benchmark against known limits, which is a commendable approach. However, the central algebraic derivation contains errors that are demonstrable by direct differentiation and by Vieta's relations, and the claimed Kiselev limit is not actually recovered. As a result, the main significance claim is not established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section IV, Eqs. (22)-(25)] Eq. (25) is not a factorization of Eq. (18). In the α=0 limit, Eq. (18) becomes B(u)=1/b²-u²+2M u³+N u, so Vieta's relations require u1+u2+u3=1/(2M). With u2=1/r0, adding Eq. (22) and Eq. (24) gives u1+u3=(1-2M/r0-N-η)/(2M), and hence u1+u2+u3=(1-N-η)/(2M), which misses the N+η term. For M=1, N=0.028, r0=5, the exact roots are {-0.112, 0.200, 0.412}, while Eqs. (22)-(24) give {-0.115, 0.200, 0.401}. Therefore the integrand in Eq. (34), the amplitudes and modulus in Eqs. (39)-(41), and the claimed exact deflection angle in Eq. (42) are all built on incorrect roots. This also invalidates the stated α=0 Kiselev limit.
  2. [Section III-IV, Eq. (14)] The photon-sphere condition is obtained by differentiating V_eff=f L²/r² with f=1-2M/r-Nr+αe^{-γr}, γ=2/(2M-αℓ). Direct differentiation gives r f'-2f=0, i.e. 6M/r+N r-2αe^{-γr}(γr+1)=2, which has the opposite sign for the γr term compared with Eq. (14). This sign error propagates into the linearized equation Eq. (15) and the photon-sphere radius Eq. (16), so the critical impact parameter Eq. (21) and all subsequent r_ps-dependent quantities are not reliable.
  3. [Section IV, Eq. (15)] The linearization e^{-γr}≈1-γr is stated to be valid for r<M-αℓ/2, but the photon sphere in Fig. 4 lies near r≈3-6 for the parameter choices M=1, ℓ=0.05. For example, with α=0.2 the stated bound is r<0.995, which is far below the plotted r_ps values. Using the expansion outside its stated domain means Eq. (16) and the critical parameters derived from it are not valid even after correcting the sign in Eq. (14).
  4. [Section II, Eqs. (2) and (5)] The metric is not defined consistently. Eq. (2) introduces M and states M=M+αℓ/2, but the subsequent formulas use M as the mass parameter and an exponent -2r/(2M-αℓ); the two masses are conflated throughout. In addition, Eq. (5) for the horizon does not follow from f(r_h)=0 using the same linearized exponential that is used elsewhere. A consistent definition of the metric and a correct horizon calculation are needed before the admissible range of r_0 can be trusted.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Various] There are several typographical errors: 'Schwar-zschild' in Section I, 'subfig (a) of of Fig. 9' in Section V, and an incomplete sentence in the abstract ('the influence of the scalar field... shows a nontrivial effect: while moderate values...').
  2. [Section III, Eq. (6)] Null geodesics should be parameterized by an affine parameter, not by 'proper time τ'; the wording is standard and should be corrected.
  3. [Section V, Fig. 9] In Fig. 9(b) and the surrounding text, the case N=0, α=0.2 is labeled 'Kiselev BH', but the Kiselev solution in Ref. [74] has no scalar hair; that case is a hairy Schwarzschild-type spacetime, and the caption also refers to 'Hairy BH' ambiguously.
  4. [Section II, Eq. (5)] The claim that for ω=-4/3 and ω=-1 the metric admits two horizons is presented as a graphical observation; an explicit statement that this is numerical rather than analytic would improve the presentation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the bending-angle derivation is an analytic reduction from the stated metric, with no fitted parameters or load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's derivation is self-contained analytic work starting from a given metric (Eq. 1-2, attributed to ref. [93]). The geodesic equation, effective potential, critical impact parameter, and the final elliptic-integral bending angle (Eq. 42) are obtained by direct algebraic transformation of the null geodesic path integral. There is no calibration to data, no free parameter fitted to the target observable, and no claim that an output was predicted from an input that already contained it. The checks against the Schwarzschild limit (Iyer & Petters, ref. [27]) and the Kiselev limit (Younas et al., ref. [78]) are external benchmarks, not circular re-statements of the present result. Numerous self-citations appear in the reference list, but none is load-bearing: they are background examples of lensing calculations, not the source of the metric, the integrand, or the elliptic-integral technique. No uniqueness theorem from the authors is invoked, and no ansatz is smuggled in via citation: the hair parameter enters through the explicitly adopted metric function. The main weakness of the paper, as the surrounding analysis shows, is that the cubic factorization in Eq. (25) may not actually reproduce B(u) in Eq. (18), meaning the claimed exact formula is likely a mathematical error rather than a circular derivation. Under the circularity rubric, a derivation that fails to be correct is distinct from one that reduces to its inputs by definition or by fitted parameters; therefore the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on the hairy Kiselev metric imported from ref [93], the choice ω=-2/3, and an ad hoc linearization of the exponential hair term that is used outside its stated domain. No new physical entities are introduced; the free parameters are the model parameters M, N, α, ℓ, ω, which are chosen by hand for the plots rather than fitted to data.

free parameters (5)
  • α (scalar hair coupling) = 0.2 (illustrative; values 0.1-0.4 in figures)
    Model parameter of the metric; not fitted to data, chosen for plots. The central claim depends qualitatively on α.
  • N (quintessence field normalization) = 0.007 (illustrative; 0 to 0.028 in figures)
    Model parameter controlling quintessence strength; chosen for plots.
  • ℓ (hair length constant) = 0.05
    Length scale in the exponential hair term; fixed throughout.
  • ω (equation of state parameter) = -2/3 (fixed)
    The analysis restricts to ω=-2/3 to make horizon and bending integrals tractable.
  • M (black hole mass) = 1 (units of length, G=c=1)
    Sets the overall scale; plots use M=1.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The metric (2) is a valid hairy Kiselev solution from gravitational decoupling
    Taken from ref [93]; the paper does not derive it.
  • domain assumption ω and N must have opposite signs to satisfy the weak energy condition
    Stated in Section II after Eq. (2); used to pick ω=-2/3, N>0.
  • domain assumption The spacetime is treated as a black hole with a single horizon for ω=-2/3; the region beyond the horizon is ignored
    For ω=-2/3 the metric is not asymptotically flat (f ~ -N r at large r); the paper integrates to r=∞ as if it were a standard asymptotically flat lens.
  • ad hoc to paper Exponential hair term can be linearized as e^{-γ r} ≈ 1 - γ r for the photon-sphere calculation
    Introduced in Eq. (15) with the condition r < M - αℓ/2, but used at r ≈ 3M.
  • standard math Standard elliptic integral identities and Cardano's method
    Used to evaluate the bending integral and solve the cubic for r0(b).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Equatorial light bending around a Hairy Kiselev Black Hole." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WIDDFR3V

@misc{pith2026250715298,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Equatorial light bending around a Hairy Kiselev Black Hole},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WIDDFR3V}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.15298}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the deflection angle of light rays confined to the equatorial plane of a Hairy Kiselev black hole. The analysis includes a thorough study of the horizon structure and critical parameters, leading to an analytic expression for the deflection angle in terms of elliptic integrals. Our results confirm that the deflection angle decreases with increasing impact parameter, in agreement with classical predictions of gravitational lensing. The influence of the scalar field, characterized by the coupling constant, shows a nontrivial effect: while moderate values of the coupling constant initially enhance light bending, further increases lead to a suppression of the deflection in the strong-field regime due to modifications in spacetime geometry. Comparative analysis among the Schwarzschild, Kiselev, and Hairy Kiselev black holes indicates that the presence of a quintessential field tends to enhance the deflection, whereas the scalar hair component reduces it. These findings underscore the significant role of scalar fields and exotic matter distributions in shaping light propagation in a modified gravity scenario.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.15298 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: The variation of metric function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Variation of BH horizon with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Behavior of the effective potential as a function of radial distance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Variation of BH photon sphere with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Closest approach as as a function of impact parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: (a) Three dimensional scatter plot of distance of closest approach as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Bending angle as a function of impact parameter is shown for varying values of the coupling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Bending angle as a function of coupling constant and surrounding field parameter. Here, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: (a) Bending angle as a function of coupling constant for different values of impact pa [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gravitational Lensing and Topological Photon Sphere of Holonomy Corrected Schwarzschild Black Hole with a Cloud of Strings

    gr-qc 2025-09 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The lensing deflection, image magnification, photon-sphere topology, and accretion-disk emission of a holonomy-corrected Schwarzschild black hole with a string cloud depend on the string and quantum-correction paramet...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

106 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [78]

    Strong gravita- tional lensing by kiselev black hole

    Azka Younas, Mubasher Jamil, Sebastian Bahamonde, and Saqib Hussain. Strong gravita- tional lensing by kiselev black hole. Physical Review D, 92(8), October 2015

    work page 2015

  2. [93]

    J. Ovalle. Decoupling gravitational sources in general relativity: The extended case. Physics Letters B, 788:213–218, 2019

    work page 2019

  3. [1]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Kazunori Akiyama et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole. Astrophys. J. Lett., 875:L1, 2019

    2019

  4. [2]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Kazunori Akiyama et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole. Astrophys. J. Lett., 875(1):L6, 2019

    2019

  5. [3]

    On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein’s theory

    Karl Schwarzschild. On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein’s theory. Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys. ), 1916:189–196, 1916

    1916

  6. [4]

    K. A. Bronnikov. Scalar-tensor theory and scalar charge. Acta Phys. Polon. B, 4:251–266, 1973

    1973

  7. [5]

    Brane world gravity

    Roy Maartens. Brane world gravity. Living Rev. Rel., 7:7, 2004

    2004

  8. [6]

    f(R) theories

    Antonio De Felice and Shinji Tsujikawa. f(R) theories. Living Rev. Rel., 13:3, 2010

    2010

Show all 106 references
  1. [7]

    Tiberiu Harko, Francisco S. N. Lobo, Shin’ichi Nojiri, and Sergei D. Odintsov. f (R, T) gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 84:024020, 2011

    2011

  2. [8]

    Extended Theories of Gravity

    Salvatore Capozziello and Mariafelicia De Laurentis. Extended Theories of Gravity. Phys. Rept., 509:167–321, 2011

    2011

  3. [9]

    Sotiriou and Shuang-Yong Zhou

    Thomas P. Sotiriou and Shuang-Yong Zhou. Black hole hair in generalized scalar-tensor gravity. Phys. Rev. Lett., 112:251102, 2014

    2014

  4. [10]

    Donoghue

    John F. Donoghue. General relativity as an effective field theory: The leading quantum corrections. Phys. Rev. D, 50:3874–3888, 1994

    1994

  5. [11]

    V. H. Satheeshkumar. Nature of singularities in vector-tensor theories of gravity. In 16th 22 Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Astrophysics and Relativistic Field Theories, 11 2021

    2021

  6. [12]

    Phenomeno- logical aspects of black holes beyond general relativity

    Ra´ ul Carballo-Rubio, Francesco Di Filippo, Stefano Liberati, and Matt Visser. Phenomeno- logical aspects of black holes beyond general relativity. Phys. Rev. D, 98(12):124009, 2018

    2018

  7. [13]

    Constraining dark energy equations of state in F(R,T) gravity

    Ahmed Errahmani, Amine Bouali, Safae Dahmani, Imad El Bojaddaini, and Taoufik Ouali. Constraining dark energy equations of state in F(R,T) gravity. Phys. Dark Univ., 45:101512, 2024

    2024

  8. [14]

    J Soldner. On the deflection of a light ray from its rectilinear motion, by the attraction of a celestial body at which it nearly passes by the attraction of a celestial body that it passes close to. Berliner Astronomisches Jahrbuch, 161(1804):1804, 1804

  9. [15]

    F. W. Dyson, A. S. Eddington, and C. Davidson. A Determination of the Deflection of Light by the Sun’s Gravitational Field, from Observations Made at the Total Eclipse of May 29,

  10. [16]

    The gravity field of a particle

    Charles Galton Darwin. The gravity field of a particle. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 249(1257):180–194, 1959

    1959

  11. [17]

    1 3 cos−1 −2σ3b6 + 9σb4 + 54M b2 6σ2b4 + 18b2 r 9 σ2b4 + 3b2 !# − σb2 3 . (31) At N = 0 and α = 0, it consistently reduces to the Schwarzschild BH case [27], r0(SBH ) = 2b√ 3 cos

    investigated light propagation near compact objects and explored photon trajectories 2 under extreme gravitational fields. Luminet [18] provided one of the first detailed simula- tions of BH shadows and the visual appearance of accretion disks, incorporating relativistic lensi...

  12. [18]

    Image of a spherical black hole with thin accretion disk

    J-P Luminet. Image of a spherical black hole with thin accretion disk. Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 75, no. 1-2, May 1979, p. 228-235., 75:228–235, 1979

    1979

  13. [19]

    On light tracks near a very massive star

    Robert d’Escourt Atkinson. On light tracks near a very massive star. Astronomical Journal, Vol. 70, p. 517, 70:517, 1965

    1965

  14. [20]

    The black hole as a gravitational “lens”

    Hans C Ohanian. The black hole as a gravitational “lens”. American Journal of Physics, 55(5):428–432, 1987

    1987

  15. [21]

    The mathematical theory of black holes, volume 69

    Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar. The mathematical theory of black holes, volume 69. Oxford university press, 1998

    1998

  16. [22]

    Spacetime perspective of schwarzschild lensing

    Simonetta Frittelli, Thomas P Kling, and Ezra T Newman. Spacetime perspective of schwarzschild lensing. Physical Review D, 61(6):064021, 2000

    2000

  17. [23]

    Schwarzschild black hole lensing

    Kumar Shwetketu Virbhadra and George FR Ellis. Schwarzschild black hole lensing. Physical Review D, 62(8):084003, 2000

    2000

  18. [24]

    On relativistic corrections to microlensing effects: applications to the galactic black hole

    AO Petters. On relativistic corrections to microlensing effects: applications to the galactic black hole. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 338(2):457–464, 2003. 23

    2003

  19. [25]

    Reissner-nordstr¨ om black hole lensing

    Ernesto F Eiroa, Gustavo E Romero, and Diego F Torres. Reissner-nordstr¨ om black hole lensing. Physical Review D, 66(2):024010, 2002

    2002

  20. [26]

    Strong field limit of black hole gravitational lensing

    Valerio Bozza, Salvatore Capozziello, Gerardo Iovane, and Gaetano Scarpetta. Strong field limit of black hole gravitational lensing. General Relativity and Gravitation, 33:1535–1548, 2001

    2001

  21. [27]

    Exact gravitational lens equation in spherically symmetric and static space- times

    Volker Perlick. Exact gravitational lens equation in spherically symmetric and static space- times. Physical Review D, 69(6):064017, 2004

    2004

  22. [28]

    S. V. Iyer and E. C. Hansen. Light’s Bending Angle in the Equatorial Plane of a Kerr Black Hole. Phys. Rev. D, 80:124023, 2009

    2009

  23. [29]

    Iyer and Arlie O

    Savitri V. Iyer and Arlie O. Petters. Light’s bending angle due to black holes: From the photon sphere to infinity. Gen. Rel. Grav., 39:1563–1582, 2007

    2007

  24. [30]

    Equatorial light bending around Kerr- Newman black holes

    You-Wei Hsiao, Da-Shin Lee, and Chi-Yong Lin. Equatorial light bending around Kerr- Newman black holes. Phys. Rev. D, 101(6):064070, 2020

    2020

  25. [31]

    Bending angle of light in equatorial plane of Kerr–Sen Black Hole

    Rashmi Uniyal, Hemwati Nandan, and Philippe Jetzer. Bending angle of light in equatorial plane of Kerr–Sen Black Hole. Phys. Lett. B, 782:185–192, 2018

    2018

  26. [32]

    Beloborodov

    Andrei M. Beloborodov. Gravitational bending of light near compact objects. Astrophys. J. Lett., 566:L85–L88, 2002

    2002

  27. [33]

    Gravita- tional bending angle of light for finite distance and the Gauss-Bonnet theorem

    Asahi Ishihara, Yusuke Suzuki, Toshiaki Ono, Takao Kitamura, and Hideki Asada. Gravita- tional bending angle of light for finite distance and the Gauss-Bonnet theorem. Phys. Rev. D, 94(8):084015, 2016

    2016

  28. [34]

    ¨Ovg¨ un

    A. ¨Ovg¨ un. Weak field deflection angle by regular black holes with cosmic strings using the Gauss-Bonnet theorem. Phys. Rev. D, 99(10):104075, 2019

    2019

  29. [35]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, John F. Donoghue, Barry R. Holstein, Ludovic Plant´ e, and Pierre Vanhove. Bending of Light in Quantum Gravity. Phys. Rev. Lett., 114(6):061301, 2015

    2015

  30. [36]

    Analytical approach to strong gravitational lensing from ultracompact objects

    Rajibul Shaikh, Pritam Banerjee, Suvankar Paul, and Tapobrata Sarkar. Analytical approach to strong gravitational lensing from ultracompact objects. Phys. Rev. D, 99(10):104040, 2019

    2019

  31. [37]

    Pedro V. P. Cunha, Nelson A. Eir´ o, Carlos A. R. Herdeiro, and Jos´ e P. S. Lemos. Lensing and shadow of a black hole surrounded by a heavy accretion disk. JCAP, 03:035, 2020

    2020

  32. [38]

    J. W. Moffat and V. T. Toth. The Bending of light and lensing in modified gravity. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 397:1885–1992, 2009

    1992

  33. [39]

    Strong gravitational lensing by an electrically charged black hole in Eddington-inspired Born-Infeld gravity

    Hajime Sotani and Umpei Miyamoto. Strong gravitational lensing by an electrically charged black hole in Eddington-inspired Born-Infeld gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 92(4):044052, 2015

    2015

  34. [40]

    Majumdar and Nupur Mukherjee

    Archan S. Majumdar and Nupur Mukherjee. Gravitational lensing in the weak field limit by a braneworld black hole. Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 20:2487–2496, 2005

    2005

  35. [41]

    Gravitational lensing of massive particles in 24 Schwarzschild gravity

    Xionghui Liu, Junji Jia, and Nan Yang. Gravitational lensing of massive particles in 24 Schwarzschild gravity. Class. Quant. Grav., 33(17):175014, 2016

    2016

  36. [42]

    Gravitational lensing by a black hole in effective loop quantum gravity

    Qi-Ming Fu and Xin Zhang. Gravitational lensing by a black hole in effective loop quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 105(6):064020, 2022

    2022

  37. [43]

    Gravitational lensing in Tangherlini spacetime in the weak gravitational field and the strong gravitational field

    Naoki Tsukamoto, Takao Kitamura, Koki Nakajima, and Hideki Asada. Gravitational lensing in Tangherlini spacetime in the weak gravitational field and the strong gravitational field. Phys. Rev. D, 90(6):064043, 2014

    2014

  38. [44]

    Shadow and deflection angle of asymptotic, magnetically-charged, non-singular black hole

    Yashmitha Kumaran and Ali ¨Ovg¨ un. Shadow and deflection angle of asymptotic, magnetically-charged, non-singular black hole. Eur. Phys. J. C, 83(9):812, 2023

    2023

  39. [45]

    Null geodesics and shadow of hairy black holes in Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton gravity

    Mohaddese Heydari-Fard, Malihe Heydari-Fard, and Hamid Reza Sepangi. Null geodesics and shadow of hairy black holes in Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton gravity. Phys. Rev. D , 105(12):124009, 2022

    2022

  40. [46]

    Exact gravitational lensing in conformal gravity and Schwarzschild–de Sitter spacetime

    Yen-Kheng Lim and Qing-hai Wang. Exact gravitational lensing in conformal gravity and Schwarzschild–de Sitter spacetime. Phys. Rev. D, 95(2):024004, 2017

    2017

  41. [47]

    Strong gravitational lensing by a strongly naked null singularity

    Suvankar Paul. Strong gravitational lensing by a strongly naked null singularity. Phys. Rev. D, 102(6):064045, 2020

    2020

  42. [48]

    Deflection of Light Around a Ro- tating BTZ Black Hole

    Shubham Kala, Hemwati Nandan, and Prateek Sharma. Deflection of Light Around a Ro- tating BTZ Black Hole. Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 35(39):2050323, 2020

    2020

  43. [49]

    Deflection of light and shadow cast by a dual-charged stringy black hole

    Shubham Kala, Saurabh, Hemwati Nandan, and Prateek Sharma. Deflection of light and shadow cast by a dual-charged stringy black hole. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 35(28):2050177, 2020

    2020

  44. [50]

    Pantig, and Ali ¨Ovg¨ un

    Wajiha Javed, Mehak Atique, Reggie C. Pantig, and Ali ¨Ovg¨ un. Weak Deflection Angle, Hawking Radiation and Greybody Bound of Reissner–Nordstr¨ om Black Hole Corrected by Bounce Parameter. Symmetry, 15(1):148, 2023

    2023

  45. [51]

    Weak gravitational lensing and shadow cast by rotating black holes in axionic Chern–Simons theory

    Nashiba Parbin, Dhruba Jyoti Gogoi, and Umananda Dev Goswami. Weak gravitational lensing and shadow cast by rotating black holes in axionic Chern–Simons theory. Phys. Dark Univ., 41:101265, 2023

    2023

  46. [52]

    Shadow and weak gravitational 25 lensing of a rotating regular black hole in a non-minimally coupled Einstein-Yang-Mills theory in the presence of plasma

    Shubham Kala, Hemwati Nandan, and Prateek Sharma. Shadow and weak gravitational 25 lensing of a rotating regular black hole in a non-minimally coupled Einstein-Yang-Mills theory in the presence of plasma. Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 137(4):457, 2022

    2022

  47. [53]

    Light bending and gravitational lensing in energy-momentum-squared gravity

    Elham Nazari. Light bending and gravitational lensing in energy-momentum-squared gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 105(10):104026, 2022

    2022

  48. [54]

    Weak gravitational lensing in Ricci-coupled Kalb–Ramond bumblebee gravity: Global monopole and axion-plasmon medium effects

    Ali ¨Ovg¨ un. Weak gravitational lensing in Ricci-coupled Kalb–Ramond bumblebee gravity: Global monopole and axion-plasmon medium effects. Phys. Dark Univ., 48:101905, 2025

    2025

  49. [55]

    ¨Ovg¨ un,˙I

    A. ¨Ovg¨ un,˙I. Sakallı, and J. Saavedra. Effect of null aether field on weak deflection angle of black holes. Chin. Phys. C, 44(12):125105, 2020

    2020

  50. [56]

    Strong gravitational lensing and shadow constraint from M87* of slowly rotating Kerr-like black hole

    Xiao-Mei Kuang and Ali ¨Ovg¨ un. Strong gravitational lensing and shadow constraint from M87* of slowly rotating Kerr-like black hole. Annals Phys., 447:169147, 2022

    2022

  51. [57]

    Pantig and Ali ¨Ovg¨ un

    Reggie C. Pantig and Ali ¨Ovg¨ un. Testing dynamical torsion effects on the charged black hole’s shadow, deflection angle and greybody with M87* and Sgr. A* from EHT. Annals Phys., 448:169197, 2023

    2023

  52. [58]

    Optical properties of a braneworld black hole: Gravitational lensing and retrolensing

    Ahmadjon Abdujabbarov, Bobomurat Ahmedov, Naresh Dadhich, and Farruh Atamurotov. Optical properties of a braneworld black hole: Gravitational lensing and retrolensing. Phys. Rev. D, 96(8):084017, 2017

    2017

  53. [59]

    Finite-distance gravitational deflection of massive particles by a Kerr-like black hole in the bumblebee gravity model

    Zonghai Li and Ali ¨Ovg¨ un. Finite-distance gravitational deflection of massive particles by a Kerr-like black hole in the bumblebee gravity model. Phys. Rev. D, 101(2):024040, 2020

    2020

  54. [60]

    Gravitational lensing around a dual-charged stringy black hole in plasma background.Eur

    Shubham Kala, Hemwati Nandan, Amare Abebe, and Saswati Roy. Gravitational lensing around a dual-charged stringy black hole in plasma background.Eur. Phys. J. C, 84(10):1089, 2024

    2024

  55. [61]

    Farruh Atamurotov, Odil Yunusov, Ahmadjon Abdujabbarov, and G. Mustafa. Gravitational weak lensing of hairy black hole in presence of plasma. New Astron., 105:102098, 2024

    2024

  56. [62]

    Ghosh, and Sunil D

    Shafqat Ul Islam, Sushant G. Ghosh, and Sunil D. Maharaj. Strong gravitational lensing by Bardeen black holes in 4D EGB gravity: Constraints from supermassive black holes. Chin. J. Phys., 89:1710–1724, 2024

    2024

  57. [63]

    Yiyang Wang, Amnish Vachher, Qiang Wu, Tao Zhu, and Sushant G. Ghosh. Strong gravita- tional lensing by static black holes in effective quantum gravity. Eur. Phys. J. C, 85(3):302, 2025

    2025

  58. [64]

    Rahul Kumar, Shafqat Ul Islam, and Sushant G. Ghosh. Gravitational lensing by charged black hole in regularized 4 D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity. Eur. Phys. J. C, 80(12):1128, 26 2020

    2020

  59. [65]

    Ghosh, and Anzhong Wang

    Rahul Kumar, Sushant G. Ghosh, and Anzhong Wang. Gravitational deflection of light and shadow cast by rotating Kalb-Ramond black holes. Phys. Rev. D, 101(10):104001, 2020

    2020

  60. [66]

    Pantig, Shubham Kala, Ali ¨Ovg¨ un, and Nikko John Leo S

    Reggie C. Pantig, Shubham Kala, Ali ¨Ovg¨ un, and Nikko John Leo S. Lobos. Testing black holes with cosmological constant in Einstein-bumblebee gravity through the black hole shadow using EHT data and deflection angle. IGGMMP, 06 2025

    2025

  61. [67]

    Strong gravitational lensing by Bardeen black hole in cloud of strings

    Bijendra Kumar Vishvakarma, Shubham Kala, and Sanjay Siwach. Strong gravitational lensing by Bardeen black hole in cloud of strings. Annals Phys., 475:169957, 2025

    2025

  62. [68]

    Saswati Roy, Shubham Kala, Atanu Singha, Hemwati Nandan, and A. K. Sen. Deflection of Light due to Kerr Sen Black Hole in Heterotic String Theory using Material Medium Approach, 4 2025

    2025

  63. [69]

    Propagation of massless particles around a BTZ-ModMax black hole, 1 2025

    Shubham Kala. Propagation of massless particles around a BTZ-ModMax black hole, 1 2025

    2025

  64. [70]

    Riess et al

    Adam G. Riess et al. BV RI light curves for 22 type Ia supernovae. Astron. J., 117:707–724, 1999

    1999

  65. [71]

    Saswati Roy, Shubham Kala, Prasanjit Ghosh, Hemwati Nandan, and Asoke K. Sen. Non- Equatorial Deflection of Light due to Kerr-Newman Black Hole: A Material Medium Ap- proach, 6 2025

    2025

  66. [72]

    P. J. E. Peebles and Bharat Ratra. The Cosmological Constant and Dark Energy. Rev. Mod. Phys., 75:559–606, 2003

    2003

  67. [73]

    Riess et al

    Adam G. Riess et al. Type Ia supernova discoveries at z> 1 from the Hubble Space Telescope: Evidence for past deceleration and constraints on dark energy evolution. Astrophys. J., 607:665–687, 2004

    2004

  68. [74]

    Quintessence and black holes

    V V Kiselev. Quintessence and black holes. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 20(6):1187–1197, March 2003

    2003

  69. [75]

    A constant equation of state for quintessence? Int

    Elisa Di Pietro and Jacques Demaret. A constant equation of state for quintessence? Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 10:231–237, 2001

    2001

  70. [76]

    Strong gravitational lensing with upcoming wide-field radio surveys, 12 2024

    Samuel McCarty and Liam Connor. Strong gravitational lensing with upcoming wide-field radio surveys, 12 2024

    2024

  71. [77]

    Ian Harrison, Stefano Camera, Joe Zuntz, and Michael L. Brown. SKA weak lensing – I. Cosmological forecasts and the power of radio-optical cross-correlations. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 463(4):3674–3685, 2016

    2016

  72. [79]

    A higher probability of detecting lensed supermassive black hole binaries by LISA

    Zucheng Gao, Xian Chen, Yi-Ming Hu, Jian-Dong Zhang, and Shun-Jia Huang. A higher probability of detecting lensed supermassive black hole binaries by LISA. Mon. Not. Roy. 27 Astron. Soc., 512(1):1–10, 2022

    2022

  73. [80]

    Javed, J

    W. Javed, J. Abbas, and A. ¨Ovg¨ un. Effect of the quintessential dark energy on weak deflection angle by kerr–newmann black hole. Annals of Physics, 418:168183, July 2020

    2020

  74. [81]

    Abbas, Asif Mahmood, and M

    G. Abbas, Asif Mahmood, and M. Zubair. Strong deflection gravitational lensing for pho- ton coupled to weyl tensor in a charged kiselev black hole. Physics of the Dark Universe, 31:100750, 2021

    2021

  75. [82]

    Null geodesics, thermodynamics, weak gravitational lensing, and black hole shadow characteristics of a frolov regular black hole with constraints from eht observations, 2025

    Shubham Kala, Hemwati Nandan, Kush Maithani, Saswati Roy, and Amare Abebe. Null geodesics, thermodynamics, weak gravitational lensing, and black hole shadow characteristics of a frolov regular black hole with constraints from eht observations, 2025

    2025

  76. [83]

    Geodesics and bending of light around a btz black hole surrounded by quintessential matter.Modern Physics Letters A, 36(31):2150224, 2021

    Shubham Kala, Hemwati Nandan, Prateek Sharma, and Maye Elmardi. Geodesics and bending of light around a btz black hole surrounded by quintessential matter.Modern Physics Letters A, 36(31):2150224, 2021

    2021

  77. [84]

    Mustafa, Farruh Atamurotov, Ibrar Hussain, Sanjar Shaymatov, and Ali ¨Ovg¨ un

    G. Mustafa, Farruh Atamurotov, Ibrar Hussain, Sanjar Shaymatov, and Ali ¨Ovg¨ un. Shadows and gravitational weak lensing by the schwarzschild black hole in the string cloud background with quintessential field*. Chinese Physics C, 46(12):125107, December 2022

    2022

  78. [85]

    Strong gravitational lensing by a charged kiselev black hole

    Mustapha Azreg-A ¨ ınou, Sebastian Bahamonde, and Mubasher Jamil. Strong gravitational lensing by a charged kiselev black hole. The European Physical Journal C, 77(6), June 2017

    2017

  79. [86]

    The Influence of Free Quintessence on Gravitational Frequency Shift and Deflection of Light with 4D momentum

    Molin Liu, Jianbo Lu, and Yuanxing Gui. The Influence of Free Quintessence on Gravitational Frequency Shift and Deflection of Light with 4D momentum. Eur. Phys. J. C, 59:107–116, 2009

    2009

  80. [87]

    Light bending as a probe of the nature of dark energy

    Fabio Finelli, Matteo Galaverni, and Alessandro Gruppuso. Light bending as a probe of the nature of dark energy. Phys. Rev. D, 75:043003, 2007

    2007

  81. [88]

    Weak deflection angle and shadow cast by the charged-Kiselev black hole with cloud of strings in plasma*

    Farruh Atamurotov, Ibrar Hussain, Ghulam Mustafa, and Ali ¨Ovg¨ un. Weak deflection angle and shadow cast by the charged-Kiselev black hole with cloud of strings in plasma*. Chin. Phys. C, 47(2):025102, 2023

    2023

  82. [89]

    Null trajectories and bending of light in charged black holes with quintessence

    Sharmanthie Fernando, Scott Meadows, and Kevon Reis. Null trajectories and bending of light in charged black holes with quintessence. Int. J. Theor. Phys., 54(10):3634–3653, 2015

    2015

  83. [90]

    Decoupling gravitational sources in general relativity: From perfect to anisotropic fluids

    Jorge Ovalle. Decoupling gravitational sources in general relativity: From perfect to anisotropic fluids. Phys. Rev. D, 95:104019, May 2017

    2017

  84. [91]

    Mustafa, Farruh Atamurotov, Ujjal Debnath, and Dhruv Arora

    Niyaz Uddin Molla, Himanshu Chaudhary, G. Mustafa, Farruh Atamurotov, Ujjal Debnath, and Dhruv Arora. Strong gravitational lensing by SgrA ∗ and M 87∗ black holes embedded in 28 dark matter halo exhibiting string cloud and quintessential field. Eur. Phys. J. C, 84(6):574, 2024

    2024

  85. [92]

    Ovalle, R

    J. Ovalle, R. Casadio, E. Contreras, and A. Sotomayor. Hairy black holes by gravitational decoupling. Physics of the Dark Universe, 31:100744, 2021

    2021

  86. [94]

    Near-horizon thermodynamics of hairy black holes from gravitational decoupling

    Rogerio Teixeira Cavalcanti, Kelvin dos Santos Alves, and Julio Marny Hoff da Silva. Near-horizon thermodynamics of hairy black holes from gravitational decoupling. Universe, 8(7):363, July 2022

    2022

  87. [95]

    Hairy kiselev black hole solutions

    Yaghoub Heydarzade, Maxim Misyura, and Vitalii Vertogradov. Hairy kiselev black hole solutions. Phys. Rev. D, 108:044073, Aug 2023

    2023

  88. [96]

    Effective quantum gravity black hole with cloud of strings surrounded by quintessence field

    Ahmad Al-Badawi, Faizuddin Ahmed, and ˙Izzet Sakallı. Effective quantum gravity black hole with cloud of strings surrounded by quintessence field. Nucl. Phys. B, 1017:116961, 2025

    2025

  89. [97]

    Quasi- normal modes and GUP-corrected Hawking radiation of BTZ black holes within modified gravity frameworks

    Faizuddin Ahmed, Ahmad Al-Badawi, ˙Izzet Sakallı, and Abdelmalek Bouzenadad. Quasi- normal modes and GUP-corrected Hawking radiation of BTZ black holes within modified gravity frameworks. Nucl. Phys. B, 1011:116806, 2025

    2025

  90. [98]

    A new black hole coupled with nonlinear elec- trodynamics surrounded by quintessence: Thermodynamics, geodesics, and Regge–Wheeler potential

    Ahmad Al-Badawi and Faizuddin Ahmed. A new black hole coupled with nonlinear elec- trodynamics surrounded by quintessence: Thermodynamics, geodesics, and Regge–Wheeler potential. Chin. J. Phys., 94:185–203, 2025

    2025

  91. [99]

    Motions of test particles in gravitational field, perturbations and greybody factor of Bardeen-like AdS black hole with phantom global monopoles

    Faizuddin Ahmed, Ahmad Al-Badawi, ˙Izzet Sakallı, and Sara Kanzi. Motions of test particles in gravitational field, perturbations and greybody factor of Bardeen-like AdS black hole with phantom global monopoles. Phys. Dark Univ., 48:101907, 2025

    2025

  92. [100]

    AdS black strings in a cosmic web: geodesics, shadows, and thermodynamics

    Faizuddin Ahmed, Ahmad Al-Badawi, and Izzet Sakallı. AdS black strings in a cosmic web: geodesics, shadows, and thermodynamics. Eur. Phys. J. C, 85(5):554, 2025

    2025

  93. [101]

    Positive energy density in topologically charged exponential wormholes and Regge–Wheeler potential

    Faizuddin Ahmed, Jaydeep Goswami, and Abdelmalek Bouzenada. Positive energy density in topologically charged exponential wormholes and Regge–Wheeler potential. Eur. Phys. J. C, 85(1):110, 2025

    2025

  94. [102]

    Dunkl black hole with phan- tom global monopoles: geodesic analysis, thermodynamics and shadow

    Ahmad Al-Badawi, Faizuddin Ahmed, and ˙Izzet Sakallı. Dunkl black hole with phan- tom global monopoles: geodesic analysis, thermodynamics and shadow. Eur. Phys. J. C, 85(6):660, 2025

    2025

  95. [103]

    Probing quantum gravity effects: 29 Geodesic structure and thermodynamics of deformed Schwarzschild AdS black holes sur- rounded by cosmic strings

    Faizuddin Ahmed, Ahmad Al-Badawi, and ˙Izzet Sakallı. Probing quantum gravity effects: 29 Geodesic structure and thermodynamics of deformed Schwarzschild AdS black holes sur- rounded by cosmic strings. Phys. Dark Univ., 48:101925, 2025

    2025

  96. [104]

    Handbook of elliptic integrals for engineers and physi- cists, volume 67

    Paul F Byrd and Morris D Friedman. Handbook of elliptic integrals for engineers and physi- cists, volume 67. Springer, 2013. 30

    2013

  97. [105]

    Exploring geodesics, quantum fields and thermodynamics of Schwarzschild-AdS black hole with a global monopole in non- commutative geometry

    Faizuddin Ahmed, Ahmad Al-Badawi, and ˙Izzet Sakallı. Exploring geodesics, quantum fields and thermodynamics of Schwarzschild-AdS black hole with a global monopole in non- commutative geometry. Nucl. Phys. B, 1017:116951, 2025

    2025

  98. [1919]

    Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 220:291–333, 1920

    1920

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.