Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Systematic Improvement of Hamiltonian Truncation Effective Theory

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that Hamiltonian truncation errors in 1+1D $\lambda\phi^4$ theory fall as $1/E_{\max}^4$ once next-order nonlocal matching terms are included.

desk verdict A careful NLO extension of HTET with a useful consistency check; worth refereeing, but the headline error-scaling claim rests on a smoothness assumption the paper does not fully test. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.15941 v1 pith:BQEE7QLI submitted 2025-07-21 hep-th cond-mat.str-elhep-lathep-ph

Ekrem Demiray , Kara Farnsworth , Rachel Houtz This is my paper
classification hep-thcond-mat.str-elhep-lathep-ph
keywords Hamiltoniantruncationeffectivefieldtheorynext-to-leadingorder1+1Dlambda-phi^4nonlocalmatchingtermsseparationofscalescriticalcoupling2DIsingconformal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Hamiltonian truncation approximates a quantum field theory by keeping only Fock states below an energy cutoff $E_{\max}$ and diagonalizing the resulting finite matrix; the error is controlled by inverse powers of this cutoff. This paper extends Hamiltonian Truncation Effective Theory to next-to-leading order, computing matching corrections at order $1/E_{\max}^3$ for 1+1D $\lambda\phi^4$ theory. The new ingredient is that at this order the effective Hamiltonian must contain nonlocal terms of the form $H_0$ times local operators such as $\int :\phi^2:$; these arise from expanding the nonlocal cutoff's step functions in powers of $1/E_{\max}$. Including them makes the eigenvalue errors scale as $1/E_{\max}^4$, exactly as the effective-field-theory power count predicts, and the matching coefficients still separate from infrared scales. The improved spectrum is used to estimate the critical coupling at which the theory flows to the 2D Ising conformal field theory, giving a concrete nonperturbative benchmark for the method.

What carries the argument

The matching observable is the overlap $\Sigma_{fi} = \langle \Psi_f | i\rangle$ between interacting and free eigenstates, built from the Møller operator that adiabatically switches the interaction on and maps free states to interacting states. Expanding this overlap perturbatively in the interaction gives the matching condition for each correction, for example $\langle f|H_2|i\rangle = \sum_{E_\alpha>E_{\max}} \langle f|V|\alpha\rangle\langle\alpha|V|i\rangle/(E_f-E_\alpha)$. At next-to-leading order the step functions that enforce the cutoff do not combine into purely local operators; expanding them in powers of $1/E_{\max}$ produces nonlocal structures such as $H_0$ times local fields. The eigenvalue error scaling is then the diagnostic that tells whether the matching has accounted for all states above the cutoff.

What would settle it

Compute the low-lying eigenvalue error with the next-to-leading-order nonlocal terms included at several increasing cutoffs, holding the volume and coupling fixed, and fit $\log(\text{error})$ versus $\log E_{\max}$; if the best-fit slope is not close to $-4$, or if the matched coefficients change noticeably when the volume or mass is varied, the central claim is contradicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the matching condition defined by the overlap $\Sigma_{fi} = \langle \Psi_f | i\rangle$ between interacting and free eigenstates determines an effective Hamiltonian $H_{\rm eff}=H_0+H_1+H_2+\cdots$ whose coefficients at order $1/E_{\max}^3$ are sufficient only when nonlocal, non-Hermitian terms are included. In particular, at this order the effective Hamiltonian contains operators of the form $H_0 \int R\,d\theta :\phi^2:$ alongside local $:\phi^4:$ and $:\phi^2:$ terms. The paper computes these coefficients for 1+1D $\lambda\phi^4$ theory, including the step-function expansions in Eqs. (2.34a)-(2.34b), and finds numerically that after including them the low-lying eigenvalues converge with residual error $\sim 1/E_{\max}^4$ rather than $1/E_{\max}^3$. The same calculation shows that the short-distance coefficients remain insensitive to the volume and mass, so separation of scales persists; the authors take this as evidence the effective theory can be built order by order.

Load-bearing premise

The overlap between free and interacting eigenstates is assumed to be computable by a convergent perturbative expansion at the matching scale, and the density of states near the cutoff is assumed to be smooth enough to expand the step functions in powers of $1/E_{\max}$; if either fails, the claimed $1/E_{\max}^4$ error scaling would not appear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the paper is right, the improvement scheme works beyond leading order: the operator basis used at order $1/E_{\max}^3$, including nonlocal terms, is sufficient to realize the predicted convergence.
  • Eigenvalue errors gain one power of the cutoff at each included order, so more accuracy can be obtained without enlarging the truncated Hilbert space.
  • The matching procedure can be extended to higher orders with nonlocal, non-Hermitian corrections without breaking the effective-field-theory power count.
  • Separation of scales persists at this order, meaning the matching coefficients are genuinely ultraviolet and can be transferred to other infrared observables.
  • The improved spectrum gives a numerical estimate of the critical coupling where $\lambda\phi^4$ flows to the 2D Ising conformal field theory, providing a nonperturbative anchor for future applications.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension of this work: repeat the same next-to-leading-order matching for a different interaction, such as a derivative coupling, and check whether the residual eigenvalue error still gains exactly one power of $1/E_{\max}$; the local-versus-nonlocal split should change but the power count should not.
  • Because the nonlocality enters as $H_0$ times a local operator, the effective Hamiltonian at this order is not Hermitian; using the improved convergence for spectral functions or time evolution rather than only low-lying eigenvalues would require dealing with that non-Hermiticity explicitly.
  • The separation-of-scales check is performed at fixed finite volume; extrapolating the matched coefficients to $R\to\infty$ and comparing with known infinite-volume critical behaviour would test whether the nonlocal terms stay controlled when the infrared scale is the lightest mass rather than the volume.
  • If the step-function expansion is the right mechanism, similar $H_0$ times local-operator terms should appear in any truncation scheme that imposes a total-energy cutoff, not just this Fock-space construction; searching for them in other truncation setups would test the universality of the method.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends Hamiltonian Truncation Effective Theory (HTET) for (1+1)-dimensional λφ^4 theory to next-to-leading order in the 1/Emax expansion. It computes the O(V^2) matching correction H2 through order 1/Emax^3, including nonlocal and non-Hermitian terms such as H0∫:φ^2: and H0∫:φ^4:. The authors diagonalize the resulting effective Hamiltonian in two volumes, report that eigenvalue errors scale as 1/Emax^4, estimate the critical coupling for the flow to the 2D Ising conformal field theory, and check separation of scales. The central claim is that the observed 1/Emax^4 scaling validates the EFT power counting and the completeness of the operator basis at NLO.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper is a substantial methodological advance: it demonstrates that HTET can be extended beyond leading order, that nonlocal matching operators can be incorporated systematically, and that the framework remains predictive in the strongly coupled IR while using perturbative matching in the UV. The explicit diagrammatic rules and the complete NLO expressions are a useful resource for practitioners, and the paper makes a falsifiable numerical prediction for λ_c/m^2 as well as a check of separation of scales. The main weakness is that the headline validation is largely an internal power-counting consistency check; the step-function expansion on which the NLO Hamiltonian rests is not proven uniformly valid, and the numerical fits do not directly test the coefficients of the new nonlocal terms.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2.2.2, Eqs. (2.34a)-(2.34b)] The 1/Emax expansion of H2 is obtained by expanding integrands containing the Heaviside functions Θ(Ef − ω3 − ω4 + ω5 + ω6 − Emax) and Θ(Ef + ω1 + ω2 + ω5 + ω6 − Emax). These functions are discontinuous in the intermediate-state energies, and in the finite-volume theory on a circle the spectrum is discrete with a level spacing near the cutoff of order 1/(R^2 Emax), which can be much smaller than 1/Emax. A Taylor expansion in 1/Emax therefore treats the above-cutoff density of states as smooth and assumes no intermediate state lies within O(1/Emax) of the cutoff; this is not guaranteed. Boundary contributions from the step can produce nonanalytic terms, such as logarithms of Emax, that are not represented by the operator basis kept at order 1/Emax^3. To support the central claim of 1/Emax^4 residual errors, the authors should evaluate the exact sum in (2.30) numerically for representative matrix elements and several placements of Emax, and compare it with the expanded expression. Without such a comparison, the derivation of the NLO Hamiltonian is incomplete.
  2. [Sec. 3 (numerical results)] The evidence for the claimed 1/Emax^4 scaling is a fit of eigenvalue errors versus Emax over a limited window. Because the matching procedure is constructed to cancel lower-order errors, observing the expected next-order exponent largely confirms that the operator basis is complete; it does not verify the numerical coefficients of the NLO nonlocal terms. A coefficient error that does not alter the power would pass the test, and a limited Emax range can absorb nonanalytic contamination into an effective fitted exponent. The λ_c/m^2 estimate in Sec. 3.3 is an external anchor, but the extrapolation to the Ising point is indirect. The authors should add a coefficient-level test, for example comparing one matrix element of H2 with an exact evaluation of the above-cutoff sum, or comparing a predicted energy difference against an independent Hamiltonian-truncation calculation.
  3. [Sec. 2.2, Eq. (2.21)] The matching observable Σ_fi is expanded perturbatively in V using the adiabatic switching defined in Eqs. (2.15)-(2.19). The paper assumes the hierarchy (2.12) but does not state a quantitative condition under which the perturbative series for the interacting eigenstates converges in finite volume. Near-degeneracies among low-lying free states can make the iϵ denominators in (2.21) small, and the expansion in V is not uniform in the level spacing. This affects the derivation of H2 and the order-by-order matching claim. The authors should either prove a bound on the expansion or demonstrate numerically, for a fixed small Emax, that the successive terms in the Σ expansion are controlled for the states used in the matching.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract contains the typo 'nontrival' for 'nontrivial', and the Introduction uses 'compliment' where 'complement' is meant.
  2. [Eq. (2.13) and Sec. 2.3] The power-counting formula in Eq. (2.13) is schematic; it would help to state precisely which local and nonlocal operators are assumed to be absent at order 1/Emax^3, since the nonlocal terms H0∫:φ^2: and H0∫:φ^4: are later claimed to be the only nontrivial structures at this order.
  3. [After Eqs. (2.34a)-(2.34b)] The text explains that the step functions enforce Eα > Emax; it would be useful to state explicitly that the iϵ prescription can be dropped because Eα > Emax > Ef, so the energy denominators never vanish for the retained sums.
  4. [Sec. 2.3] The final form of Heff should be displayed in coordinate space so that the nonlocal structure of the NLO terms is unambiguous; as written, the reader must reconstruct it from the diagrammatic expressions.
  5. [Sec. 3.3] The critical-coupling estimate should quote a systematic uncertainty coming from the 1/Emax^4 residual errors and from the fitting window, in addition to the statistical fit error.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: H2 is solved from the matching condition (2.24b) and the 1/E^4 residual is an internal consistency check, not a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is self-contained: the effective Hamiltonian corrections H1 and H2 are obtained by matching the overlap observable Sigma_fi between the full and truncated theories order by order in V, as in Eqs. (2.20)-(2.24). The O(V^2) matching condition (2.24b) defines <f|H2|i> as an explicit sum over above-cutoff states, so the nonlocal 1/E^3 terms are computed, not fitted to eigenvalue data. The step-function integrals (2.34a)-(2.34b) are then expanded in powers of 1/Emax, and the resulting H2 is added before numerical diagonalization. The reported 1/E^4 eigenvalue error is therefore an a posteriori consistency check: if the expansion of H2 or the operator basis were incomplete, the residual error would remain at 1/E^3. This validates the paper's own power-counting assumption but does not reduce the prediction to an input by construction. Citations to [29] provide the framework and diagrammatic rules, which are restated in Appendix A, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorem or unverified prior result is imported. The potential non-uniformity of the step-function expansion near Emax is a correctness or rigor concern, not a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the perturbative matching expansion (2.21), inherited by all NLO results, plus the assumed hierarchy (2.12) that underlies the power counting and operator basis. The matching uses the authors' prior HTET framework [29], introducing a self-citation element, but the critical coupling benchmark and separation-of-scales checks provide external anchors. No ad hoc physical entities are introduced; the nonlocal operators are derived from matching.

free parameters (2)
  • Error scaling exponent fitted from numerical data = ≈4 (expected value 4)
    The central check fits the log-log slope of the eigenvalue error versus Emax and compares it with the framework's predicted exponent 4. With only two volumes and a limited Emax range, subleading corrections could mask the asymptotic exponent.
  • Critical coupling λ_c/m² for the flow to 2D Ising = not stated in the accessible text
    The estimate is extracted from the HTET-improved spectrum by a criterion not fully described in the accessible text; the accuracy depends on that criterion and on truncation systematics, and no error bar is quoted in the abstract-level description.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Interacting eigenstates are smoothly connected to free Fock states via the adiabatic switching in Eqs. (2.15)-(2.19), and the perturbative expansion (2.21) of the matching observable is valid.
    Sec. 2.2: the matching observable Σfi is defined through the Møller operator construction and expanded in powers of V. This can fail for bound states or level crossings in finite volume, which would invalidate the NLO corrections.
  • domain assumption The hierarchy ωi, ωf ≪ Ei, Ef ≪ Emax in Eq. (2.12) holds, making the states dilute and the operator basis (2.13) complete.
    Sec. 2.1: this scale separation underlies the power counting whose consistency the paper verifies; if the hierarchy is violated, the operator basis is incomplete.
  • ad hoc to paper The step functions enforcing Eα > Emax in Eqs. (2.34a)-(2.34b) can be expanded smoothly in 1/Emax.
    Sec. 2.2.2: the NLO computation rests on treating the density of high-energy states as smooth so that the expanded nonlocal terms reproduce the full-theory sums at orders 1/Emax² and 1/Emax³.
  • domain assumption UV divergences are fully removed by normal-ordering the operators in the finite-volume theory.
    Sec. 2, footnote 2: the paper notes that separation of scales is expected to be manifest for non-normal-ordered operators in a slightly different renormalization scheme, making the numerics scheme-dependent at the computed order.
invented entities (1)
  • Nonlocal matching operators added to Heff, e.g., H0∫:φ²: and H0∫:φ⁴:
    purpose: Reproduce the effect of the nonlocal total-energy cutoff on the truncated Hilbert space at order 1/Emax³.
    These operators are derived from the O(V²) matching condition (2.30), not postulated, so they are not invented degrees of freedom. Their only falsifiable handle in this paper is the improved convergence within the same framework, which is internal evidence.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Systematic Improvement of Hamiltonian Truncation Effective Theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BQEE7QLI

@misc{pith2026250715941,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Systematic Improvement of Hamiltonian Truncation Effective Theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BQEE7QLI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.15941}
}
abstract

Hamiltonian Truncation Effective Theory is a framework that aims to improve the results of Hamiltonian truncation in a systematic, order-by-order fashion using Effective Field Theory methodology. The result is a truncated effective Hamiltonian with corrections that result from a matching procedure. We establish the rigor of this method by calculating nontrival next-to-leading order corrections in a $1/E_{\rm max}$ expansion, where $E_{\rm max}$ is our effective theory cutoff. We illustrate this explicitly using 1+1D $\lambda \phi^4$ theory, calculating corrections up to order $1/E_{\rm max}^3$. At this order, novel nonlocal contributions to the matching conditions must be incorporated. We show that by including these nonlocal terms, the error scales as $1/E_{\rm max}^4$, as expected from the Effective Field Theory power counting, providing a nontrivial check that this method is consistent and robust. We also estimate the critical coupling at which this theory flows to the 2D Ising conformal field theory and confirm that separation of scales, an essential feature of Effective Field Theory, persists at this order. These results establish Hamiltonian Truncation Effective Theory as a generic, systematic framework for improving convergence in Hamiltonian truncation and lay the groundwork to apply this method to more complex systems in higher dimensions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.15941 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Energy scaling of the first excited Z2-even state: The plot on the left shows the first Z2-even excitation above the ground state energy, ∆E + 1 , at various values of the cutoff energy Emax for H (raw) eff (green), H (LO) eff (light green), and H (NLO) eff (yellow). The black dashed lines indicate the corresponding power-law fits. The plot on the right shows ∆E + 1 versus 1/E4 max for H (NLO) eff , with the light b… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Energy scaling of higher excitation levels: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Scaling at stronger coupling (odd sector): [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Scaling at stronger coupling (even sector): [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Energy scaling of the first excited state: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Energy scaling of higher excitation levels: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Scaling at stronger coupling (odd sector): [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Scaling at stronger coupling (even sector): [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Excitation energy spectra plotted against the coupling λ/4π for R = 10/2π (setting m = 1). States in the Z2-even and Z2-odd sectors are distinguished by color. Results from H (raw) eff are shown in dark red (dark blue), from H (LO) eff in yellow (cyan), and from H (NLO…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Excitation energy spectra plotted against the coupling λ/4π for R = 20/2π. States in the Z2-even and Z2-odd sectors are distinguished by color. Results from Hraw eff are shown in dark red (dark blue), from HLO eff in yellow (cyan), and from HNLO eff in red (blue) for …
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Extrapolated energy gaps ∆E ∞n plotted against the coupling λ/4π. The top panel shows the Emax→∞ extrapolations of the first few excitation energies ∆E − 1 (red), ∆E + 1 (blue), and ∆E − 2 (green), with error bars determined as described in the text. Each energy gap i…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Higher-order structure of Hamiltonian truncation effective theory

    hep-ph 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    All-order local and O(Emax⁻⁴) non-local corrections are derived for Hamiltonian truncation effective theory of 2D λφ⁴; numerically, NNLO barely improves on NLO.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Troyer and U.-J

    M. Troyer and U.-J. Wiese,Computational complexity and fundamental limitations to fermionic quantum Monte Carlo simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett.94 (2005) 170201 [cond-mat/0408370]

    arXiv 2005

  2. [2]

    Alexandru, G

    A. Alexandru, G. Basar, P.F. Bedaque, S. Vartak and N.C. Warrington,Monte Carlo Study of Real Time Dynamics on the Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.117 (2016) 081602 [1605.08040]

    arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    Brooks, III and S.C

    E.D. Brooks, III and S.C. Frautschi,Scalars Coupled to Fermions in (1+1)-dimensions, Z. Phys. C 23 (1984) 263

    work page 1984

  4. [4]

    Yurov and A.B

    V.P. Yurov and A.B. Zamolodchikov,TRUNCATED CONFORMAL SPACE APPROACH TO SCALING LEE-YANG MODEL, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A5 (1990) 3221

    work page 1990

  5. [5]

    Yurov and A.B

    V.P. Yurov and A.B. Zamolodchikov,Truncated fermionic space approach to the critical 2-D Ising model with magnetic field, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A6 (1991) 4557

    work page 1991

  6. [6]

    E. Katz, G. Marques Tavares and Y. Xu,Solving 2D QCD with an adjoint fermion analytically, JHEP 05 (2014) 143 [1308.4980]

    arXiv 2014

  7. [7]

    Hogervorst, S

    M. Hogervorst, S. Rychkov and B.C. van Rees,Truncated conformal space approach in d dimensions: A cheap alternative to lattice field theory?, Phys. Rev. D91 (2015) 025005 [1409.1581]

    arXiv 2015

  8. [8]

    E. Katz, G. Marques Tavares and Y. Xu,A solution of 2D QCD at FiniteN using a conformal basis, 1405.6727

    arXiv

Show all 70 references
  1. [9]

    Rychkov and L.G

    S. Rychkov and L.G. Vitale,Hamiltonian truncation study of theϕ4 theory in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. D91 (2015) 085011 [1412.3460]

    2015 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Rychkov and L.G

    S. Rychkov and L.G. Vitale,Hamiltonian truncation study of theϕ4 theory in two dimensions. II. TheZ2 -broken phase and the Chang duality, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 065014 [1512.00493]

    2016 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Elias-Miro, M

    J. Elias-Miro, M. Montull and M. Riembau,The renormalized Hamiltonian truncation method in the largeET expansion, JHEP 04 (2016) 144 [1512.05746]

    2016 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Bajnok and M

    Z. Bajnok and M. Lajer,Truncated Hilbert space approach to the 2dϕ4 theory, JHEP 10 (2016) 050 [1512.06901]

    2016 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Katz, Z.U

    E. Katz, Z.U. Khandker and M.T. Walters,A Conformal Truncation Framework for Infinite-Volume Dynamics, JHEP 07 (2016) 140 [1604.01766]

    2016 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Rakovszky, M

    T. Rakovszky, M. Mestyán, M. Collura, M. Kormos and G. Takács,Hamiltonian truncation approach to quenches in the Ising field theory, Nucl. Phys. B 911 (2016) 805 [1607.01068]

    2016 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Anand, V.X

    N. Anand, V.X. Genest, E. Katz, Z.U. Khandker and M.T. Walters,RG flow fromϕ4 theory to the 2D Ising model, JHEP 08 (2017) 056 [1704.04500]

    2017 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Elias-Miro, S

    J. Elias-Miro, S. Rychkov and L.G. Vitale,NLO Renormalization in the Hamiltonian Truncation, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 065024 [1706.09929]

    2017 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Rutter and B.C

    D. Rutter and B.C. van Rees,Counterterms in Truncated Conformal Perturbation Theory, 1803.05798

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    Fitzpatrick, J

    A.L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, E. Katz, L.G. Vitale and M.T. Walters,Lightcone effective Hamiltonians and RG flows, JHEP 08 (2018) 120 [1803.10793]

    2018 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Hogervorst,RG flows onSd and Hamiltonian truncation, 1811.00528

    M. Hogervorst,RG flows onSd and Hamiltonian truncation, 1811.00528. – 35 –

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    Delacrétaz, A.L

    L.V. Delacrétaz, A.L. Fitzpatrick, E. Katz and L.G. Vitale,Conformal Truncation of Chern-Simons Theory at LargeNf, JHEP 03 (2019) 107 [1811.10612]

    2019 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Fitzpatrick, E

    A.L. Fitzpatrick, E. Katz, M.T. Walters and Y. Xin,Solving the 2D SUSY Gross-Neveu-Yukawa model with conformal truncation, JHEP 01 (2021) 182 [1911.10220]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Elias-Miró and E

    J. Elias-Miró and E. Hardy,Exploring Hamiltonian Truncation ind = 2 + 1, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 065001 [2003.08405]

    2020 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Anand, A.L

    N. Anand, A.L. Fitzpatrick, E. Katz, Z.U. Khandker, M.T. Walters and Y. Xin,Introduction to Lightcone Conformal Truncation: QFT Dynamics from CFT Data, 2005.13544

    2005 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Anand, E

    N. Anand, E. Katz, Z.U. Khandker and M.T. Walters,Nonperturbative dynamics of (2+1)d ϕ4-theory from Hamiltonian truncation, JHEP 05 (2021) 190 [2010.09730]

    2021 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Tilloy,Relativistic continuous matrix product states for quantum fields without cutoff, Phys

    A. Tilloy,Relativistic continuous matrix product states for quantum fields without cutoff, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 096007 [2102.07741]

    2021 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Hogervorst, M

    M. Hogervorst, M. Meineri, J. Penedones and K.S. Vaziri,Hamiltonian truncation in Anti-de Sitter spacetime, JHEP 08 (2021) 063 [2104.10689]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Chen, A.L

    H. Chen, A.L. Fitzpatrick and D. Karateev,Form factors and spectral densities from Lightcone Conformal Truncation, JHEP 04 (2022) 109 [2107.10285]

    2022 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Anand, A.L

    N. Anand, A.L. Fitzpatrick, E. Katz and Y. Xin,Chiral limit of 2d QCD revisited with lightcone conformal truncation, JHEP 01 (2024) 189 [2111.00021]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Cohen, K

    T. Cohen, K. Farnsworth, R. Houtz and M.A. Luty,Hamiltonian Truncation Effective Theory, SciPost Phys. 13 (2022) 011 [2110.08273]

    2022 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Elias Miro and J

    J. Elias Miro and J. Ingoldby,Hamiltonian Truncation with larger dimensions, JHEP 05 (2022) 151 [2112.09049]

    2022 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Emonts and I

    P. Emonts and I. Kukuljan,Reduced density matrix and entanglement of interacting quantum field theories with Hamiltonian truncation, Phys. Rev. Res.4 (2022) 033039 [2202.11113]

    2022 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Chen, A.L

    H. Chen, A.L. Fitzpatrick, E. Katz and Y. Xin,Giving Hamiltonian Truncation a Boost, 2207.01659

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    Delacretaz, A.L

    L.V. Delacretaz, A.L. Fitzpatrick, E. Katz and M.T. Walters,Thermalization and chaos in a 1+1d QFT, JHEP 02 (2023) 045 [2207.11261]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Henning, H

    B. Henning, H. Murayama, F. Riva, J.O. Thompson and M.T. Walters,Towards a nonperturbative construction of the S-matrix, JHEP 05 (2023) 197 [2209.14306]

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Elias Miro and J

    J. Elias Miro and J. Ingoldby,Effective Hamiltonians and Counterterms for Hamiltonian Truncation, JHEP 07 (2023) 052 [2212.07266]

    2023 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Chen, A.L

    H. Chen, A.L. Fitzpatrick, E. Katz and Y. Xin,Large Momentum EFT and Lightcone Quantization, 2306.13171

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Lájer and R.M

    M.K. Lájer and R.M. Konik,Krylov spaces for truncated spectrum methodologies, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 045016 [2308.00277]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Fitzpatrick and Z

    A.L. Fitzpatrick and Z. Mei,LSZ in action: extracting form factors from correlators nonperturbatively in 2dϕ4 theory, JHEP 03 (2024) 154 [2308.11091]

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Fitzpatrick, E

    A.L. Fitzpatrick, E. Katz and Y. Xin,Lightcone Hamiltonian for Ising Field Theory I: T< T_c, 2311.16290. – 36 –

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    Delouche, J

    O. Delouche, J. Elias Miro and J. Ingoldby,Hamiltonian Truncation Crafted for UV-divergent QFTs, SciPost Phys. 16 (2024) 105 [2312.09221]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Schmoll, J

    P. Schmoll, J. Naumann, A. Nietner, J. Eisert and S. Sotiriadis,Hamiltonian truncation tensor networks for quantum field theories, 2312.12506

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    Ingoldby, M

    J. Ingoldby, M. Spannowsky, T. Sypchenko and S. Williams,Enhancing quantum field theory simulations on NISQ devices with Hamiltonian truncation, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 096016 [2407.19022]

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Delouche, J

    O. Delouche, J. Elias Miro and J. Ingoldby,Testing the RG-flowM (3, 10) + ϕ1,7 → M (3, 8) with Hamiltonian Truncation, 2412.09295

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    Fitzpatrick, E

    A.L. Fitzpatrick, E. Katz and Y. Xin,Toolkit for General 2d Scalar Potential in LCT, 2412.12255

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    Ingoldby, M

    J. Ingoldby, M. Spannowsky, T. Sypchenko, S. Williams and M. Wingate,Real-Time Scattering on Quantum Computers via Hamiltonian Truncation, 2505.03878

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    James, R.M

    A.J.A. James, R.M. Konik, P. Lecheminant, N.J. Robinson and A.M. Tsvelik, Non-perturbative methodologies for low-dimensional strongly-correlated systems: From non-abelian bosonization to truncated spectrum methods, Rept. Prog. Phys.81 (2018) 046002 [1703.08421]

    2018 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Fitzpatrick and E

    A.L. Fitzpatrick and E. Katz,Snowmass White Paper: Hamiltonian Truncation, 2201.11696

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    Lee,Quasisparse eigenvector diagonalization and stochastic error correction, Nucl

    D. Lee,Quasisparse eigenvector diagonalization and stochastic error correction, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.90 (2000) 199 [cond-mat/0008457]

    2000 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Feverati, K

    G. Feverati, K. Graham, P.A. Pearce, G.Z. Toth and G. Watts,A Renormalisation group for the truncated conformal space approach, J. Stat. Mech.0803 (2008) P03011 [hep-th/0612203]

    2008 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Giokas and G

    P. Giokas and G. Watts,The renormalisation group for the truncated conformal space approach on the cylinder, 1106.2448

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    Kleinert,Particles And Quantum Fields, World Scientific Publishing Company (2016)

    H. Kleinert,Particles And Quantum Fields, World Scientific Publishing Company (2016)

    2016

  44. [52]

    Luscher,Volume Dependence of the Energy Spectrum in Massive Quantum Field Theories

    M. Luscher,Volume Dependence of the Energy Spectrum in Massive Quantum Field Theories. 1. Stable Particle States, Commun. Math. Phys.104 (1986) 177

    1986

  45. [53]

    Luscher,Volume Dependence of the Energy Spectrum in Massive Quantum Field Theories

    M. Luscher,Volume Dependence of the Energy Spectrum in Massive Quantum Field Theories. 2. Scattering States, Commun. Math. Phys.105 (1986) 153

    1986

  46. [54]

    Chen, A.L

    H. Chen, A.L. Fitzpatrick and D. Karateev,Bootstrapping 2d ϕ4 theory with Hamiltonian truncation data, JHEP 02 (2022) 146 [2107.10286]

    2022 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Milsted, J

    A. Milsted, J. Haegeman and T.J. Osborne,Matrix product states and variational methods applied to critical quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 085030 [1302.5582]

    2013 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Bronzin, B

    S. Bronzin, B. De Palma and M. Guagnelli,New Monte Carlo determination of the critical coupling in ϕ24 theory, Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 034508 [1807.03381]

    2019 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Pelissetto and E

    A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari,Critical mass renormalization in renormalizedϕ4 theories in two and three dimensions, Phys. Lett. B751 (2015) 532 [1508.00989]

    2015 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Serone, G

    M. Serone, G. Spada and G. Villadoro,λϕ4 Theory I: The Symmetric Phase Beyond NNNNNNNNLO, JHEP 08 (2018) 148 [1805.05882]. – 37 –

    2018 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Serone, G

    M. Serone, G. Spada and G. Villadoro,λϕ4 2 theory — Part II. the broken phase beyond NNNN(NNNN)LO, JHEP 05 (2019) 047 [1901.05023]

    2019 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Heymans and M.B

    G.O. Heymans and M.B. Pinto,Critical behavior of the 2d scalar theory: resumming the N8LO perturbative mass gap, JHEP 07 (2021) 163 [2103.00354]

    2021 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Vanhecke, F

    B. Vanhecke, F. Verstraete and K. Van Acoleyen,Entanglement scaling forλϕ24, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) L071501 [2104.10564]

    2022 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Reinicke,FINITE SIZE SCALING FUNCTIONS AND CONFORMAL INVARIANCE, J

    P. Reinicke,FINITE SIZE SCALING FUNCTIONS AND CONFORMAL INVARIANCE, J. Phys. A 20 (1987) 4501

    1987

  55. [63]

    Reinicke,Analytical and Nonanalytical Corrections to Finite Size Scaling, J

    P. Reinicke,Analytical and Nonanalytical Corrections to Finite Size Scaling, J. Phys. A20 (1987) 5325

    1987

  56. [64]

    Läuchli, L

    A.M. Läuchli, L. Herviou, P.H. Wilhelm and S. Rychkov,Exact Diagonalization, Matrix Product States and Conformal Perturbation Theory Study of a 3D Ising Fuzzy Sphere Model, 2504.00842

  57. [65]

    Schaich and W

    D. Schaich and W. Loinaz,An Improved lattice measurement of the critical coupling in phi(2)**4 theory, Phys. Rev. D79 (2009) 056008 [0902.0045]

    2009 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Bosetti, B

    P. Bosetti, B. De Palma and M. Guagnelli,Monte Carlo determination of the critical coupling in ϕ4 2 theory, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 034509 [1506.08587]

    2015 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Kadoh, Y

    D. Kadoh, Y. Kuramashi, Y. Nakamura, R. Sakai, S. Takeda and Y. Yoshimura,Tensor network analysis of critical coupling in two dimensionalϕ4 theory, JHEP 05 (2019) 184 [1811.12376]

    2019 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Delcamp and A

    C. Delcamp and A. Tilloy,Computing the renormalization group flow of two-dimensionalϕ4 theory with tensor networks, Phys. Rev. Res.2 (2020) 033278 [2003.12993]

    2020 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Anderson,Infrared Catastrophe in Fermi Gases with Local Scattering Potentials, Phys

    P.W. Anderson,Infrared Catastrophe in Fermi Gases with Local Scattering Potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett.18 (1967) 1049

    1967

  62. [70]

    Molinari,Another proof of gell-mann and low’s theorem, Journal of Mathematical Physics 48 (2007)

    L.G. Molinari,Another proof of gell-mann and low’s theorem, Journal of Mathematical Physics 48 (2007) . – 38 –

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.