Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Pair production of massive charged vector bosons from the worldline

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read An interacting worldline path integral for a massive charged spin-1 particle, in either a bosonic-oscillator or N=2 fermionic-oscillator form, reproduces the known one-loop effective Lagrangian and pair-production rate.

desk verdict Genuine worldline derivation of the known spin-1 Euler-Heisenberg result, with the BRST on-shell condition as the new insight; soft spot is the QFT-anchored normalization that undercuts the 'no QFT input' claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.15943 v2 pith:ZRE7HKMA submitted 2025-07-21 hep-th hep-ph

Fiorenzo Bastianelli , Filippo Fecit , Alessandro Miccichè This is my paper
classification hep-thhep-ph
keywords worldlineformalismmassivespin-1particleProcatheoryBRSTquantizationone-loopeffectiveactionSchwingerpairproductionfunctionaldeterminantsEuler-HeisenbergLagrangian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that a massive charged spin-1 particle can be described by a first-quantized worldline path integral—a path integral over a single particle's one-dimensional trajectory in spacetime—without importing any pre-derived second-quantized QFT input. The authors construct two equivalent worldline models, one with bosonic oscillators and one with fermionic oscillators, and show in both that a consistent coupling to an electromagnetic background exists only when the background satisfies the vacuum Maxwell equations. From the path integral on a circle they derive the one-loop effective Lagrangian induced by the spin-1 particle in a constant field and the associated pair-production rate, matching the known 1965 QFT result. If correct, this extends the worldline formalism from scalars and fermions to massive charged vectors, a case that previously resisted a fully consistent first-quantized treatment.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the one-dimensional worldline path integral on the circle S1, with phase-space variables (xμ, pμ) augmented by oscillator variables for spin, and a set of first-class constraints H, L, L̄, and Jc that are gauged. The U(1)-like constraint Jc, shifted by a Chern-Simons coupling, projects onto the spin-s sector, and for s=1 the physical wavefunction is the Proca field plus a Stückelberg scalar. Coupling to electromagnetism deforms the Hamiltonian with a non-minimal term whose coefficient κ must equal 1 for the BRST charge to square to zero on the spin-1 subspace; the obstruction is proportional to ∂μFμν, so Maxwell's equations are the consistency condition. The loop computation reduces to three functional determinants, evaluated with a standard determinant theorem, and one modular integration over the worldline Wilson-loop variable w = $e^{{−iθ}}$, with the spin-1 answer coming from the double pole at w=0.

What would settle it

Compute the one-loop effective Lagrangian for massive charged vector QED directly from the Proca field action in a constant background, expand in powers of the field strength, and compare with the weak-field expansion (4.21); the coefficients 5/32 and 27/40 must match, and the pair-production rate (4.33) must equal three times the scalar rate. Any mismatch would show the worldline path integral is not computing Proca QED.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the one-loop effective Lagrangian for a massive charged vector boson in a constant electromagnetic background, equation (4.20), and the pair-production rate (4.33) follow from a first-quantized worldline path integral with no second-quantized input. The argument proceeds through a BRST analysis of the constrained particle: the spin-1 sector of the bosonic-oscillator model, and equally of the N=2 fermionic-oscillator model, admits an electromagnetic coupling precisely when the deformed BRST charge is nilpotent, which forces the background field strength to obey ∂μFμν = 0. With that consistency condition in place, the circle path integral becomes Gaussian in a constant field and is evaluated in closed form, producing the same effective Lagrangian previously obtained from quantum field theory in 1965. The same calculation also yields a vacuum instability whose rate is three times the scalar pair-production rate.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that the interacting worldline path integral is the exact first-quantized counterpart of minimally coupled massive Proca QED; if the true Hamiltonian or measure for a charged spin-1 particle differed, the recovered one-loop result would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The spin-1 worldline model is consistent exactly when the background is on-shell, so scattering amplitudes with external photons can be computed within this first-quantized framework.
  • The pair-production rate (4.33) is three times the scalar rate for the same mass and charge, a concrete quantitative signature of vector-boson vacuum instability.
  • The two first-quantized formulations, bosonic and fermionic oscillators, give identical one-loop results, so the choice of spin representation is a matter of computational convenience.
  • Non-minimal effective couplings on the worldline modify pair production through a simple mass shift in the constant-field case, such as m² → m² − 4c₁E² for scalar particles, and analogously for spin-1.
  • Higher integer spin sectors of the bosonic model cannot couple to a nonzero electromagnetic background; only the s=0 and s=1 sectors are viable within this framework.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The on-shell consistency condition suggests an off-shell extension could be built by relaxing BRST nilpotency and introducing auxiliary fields, which the paper does not attempt.
  • The equivalence of the two formulations hints that BRST nilpotency is the universal criterion for worldline electromagnetic couplings; applying the same method to spin-2 or p-forms should produce a calculable failure, which would be a sharp test of the framework.
  • The mass-shift effect of effective couplings implies that precision measurements of pair production in strong fields could constrain the sign and magnitude of an effective coupling such as c₁, complementing low-energy scattering bounds.
  • The locally constant field approximation invites the next calculation: include first-derivative corrections to the Fock-Schwinger gauge expansion and compare the resulting heat-kernel coefficients with known QFT results for inhomogeneous backgrounds.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops first-quantized worldline descriptions of a massive charged spin-1 particle, using bosonic oscillators (the 'bosonic spinning particle') and, in parallel, the standard N=2 fermionic spinning particle. It shows, via BRST analysis, that coupling to an external electromagnetic background is consistent only when the background satisfies the vacuum Maxwell equations, and that this condition singles out the spin-0 and spin-1 sectors. The main result is the one-loop effective Lagrangian (4.20) for a constant electromagnetic background and the associated pair-production rate (4.33), which reproduce the 1965 Vanyashin-Terent'ev result. The spin-0 (Weisskopf) case is recovered as a check, and the bosonic and fermionic models give identical final expressions.

Significance. If the derivation is accepted, the paper provides a genuinely first-quantized, worldline-based route to a known but nontrivial QFT result, and it identifies the on-shell condition on the background as the key consistency requirement for a charged massive vector particle. The two independent worldline formulations (bosonic oscillators and N=2 fermionic oscillators) cross-check each other, and the perturbative expansion (4.21)-(4.23) exposes the low-energy light-by-light coefficients. The paper is clearly written and technically substantial. Its main conceptual claim—that the computation proceeds 'without relying on any pre-derived QFT input'—is, however, not fully supported, because the overall normalization of the path integral is imported from scalar QED and the measure of the interacting path integral is not derived from the open BRST algebra. These issues are local in the sense that the final results appear correct, but they affect the strength of the bottom-up claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.4 and Eqs. (2.45), (4.2)] The overall normalization k = -1 in Eq. (2.45) is fixed by requiring DoF(0,D)=1, i.e., by matching the scalar QED effective action, and the same normalization and measure are then imported into the interacting path integral (4.2) and used for the spin-1 result (4.20). This is an external QFT input, which contradicts the paper's stated goal of proceeding 'without relying on any pre-derived quantum field theory input' (Introduction, p.2). Since the pair-production rate (4.33) inherits this normalization, the numerical agreement with Vanyashin-Terent'ev is not a fully independent prediction. The authors should either derive the normalization from the BRST/BV quantization of the deformed constraints, or explicitly state that the normalization is fixed by scalar QFT and adjust the bottom-up claim accordingly.
  2. [Section 3.2 and Section 4, Eqs. (3.17)-(3.28) and (4.1)-(4.5)] The covariantized constraints (3.17) do not close as a first-class algebra off-shell (Eqs. 3.20-3.21), and nilpotency of the deformed BRST charge is established only on the s=0,1 subspace and only for on-shell backgrounds. Nevertheless, the interacting path integral (4.1)-(4.5) uses the same Faddeev-Popov determinants and measure as the free theory, without a derivation of the path-integral measure for this open (on-shell-closed) algebra. A BV quantization could in principle produce additional T-dependent determinants; the paper should show that these are absent (or cancel) for constant on-shell backgrounds, or else the derivation of (4.20) is incomplete.
  3. [Section 3.2, Eq. (3.23)] The non-minimal coupling kappa=1 in the deformed Hamiltonian (3.23) is fixed by requiring the BRST charge to be nilpotent on the spin-1 sector, which is a natural consistency condition. However, the same analysis also treats the spin-0 sector, and the paper does not discuss whether the choice kappa=1 is unique or whether other values would lead to different consistent couplings. This is not a fatal issue, but it would strengthen the derivation to state explicitly that kappa=1 is the unique value for which the s=1 sector admits a non-trivial on-shell coupling.
minor comments (4)
  1. [References and text] There are several typographical slips: 'Path Integarls' in ref. [6], and 'wordline' instead of 'worldline' in Sections 5, 6 and 7.
  2. [Eq. (2.45), footnote 4] The footnote marker after 'setting the CS coupling to' is typeset as a factor '4' in the running text ('setting the CS coupling to 4 c = ...'), which is confusing and should be fixed.
  3. [Eqs. (4.14)-(4.16)] The same symbol K_± is used both for the field-strength invariants in Eq. (4.14) and for the hyperbolic/trigonometric functions K_+ = cosh(2qT K_+), K_- = cos(2qT K_-) in Eq. (4.16). The notation should be made unambiguous, for example by using a and b for the invariants.
  4. [Section 4, after Eq. (4.20)] Since ref. [76] contains a worldline path-integral representation of the spin-1 effective action, the authors should explicitly explain what is new in their bottom-up derivation relative to that earlier top-down construction; the current text mentions it only in the conclusions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the spin-1 effective action is computed from a genuine path integral; the only external input is the overall loop normalization fixed by scalar QED, and the central claim does not reduce to its target result.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The only point at which a pre-derived QFT input enters is the overall normalization of the free worldloop path integral: k is fixed to -1 by requiring DoF(0,D)=1, matching scalar QED (Section 2.4, Eqs. (2.43)-(2.45)). This is a real QFT input, so the abstract's phrase 'without relying on any pre-derived quantum field theory (QFT) input' is an overstatement. However, this normalization is a single spin-independent constant; it fixes the overall scale of the loop but does not inject the field-dependent structure of the spin-1 effective action. The spin-1 terms in Eq. (4.20) arise from explicit functional determinants (4.9)-(4.11) and the modular residue computation (4.16)-(4.19), using the CS projection c=3/2+s and the non-minimal coupling kappa=1. The value kappa=1 and the on-shell condition on the background are derived from BRST nilpotency (Eqs. (3.22)-(3.28)), not fitted to the target Vanyashin-Terent'ev result; the comparison with Ref. [18] is an external benchmark. Self-citations, notably [32] used in the fermionic BRST discussion in Section 5, support standard techniques and are not load-bearing for the central path integral computation. The paper also openly acknowledges an unresolved point, the worldline origin of the massless charged spin-1 no-go theorem, which is a limitation rather than a circular step. For these reasons, no step reduces to its own input by construction; the score of 1 reflects the mild normalization input and self-citation, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation introduces no new physical entities. It does introduce two types of borrowed input: the numerical normalization of the worldloop path integral (k=-1, fixed by scalar QFT) and the hand-chosen non-minimal coupling kappa=1, plus the Chern-Simons coupling fixed by spin projection. These are the main unpaid assumptions. No data are fitted.

free parameters (4)
  • kappa (non-minimal EM coupling) = 1
    Coefficient 2kappa in the deformed worldline Hamiltonian H_kappa (Eq. 3.23). Chosen by hand so that the deformed BRST charge is nilpotent on the s=1 sector; the effective action depends on this value.
  • overall normalization k = -1
    Set in Section 2.4 so the free worldloop path integral reproduces the scalar QFT result (DoF=1). This imports a QFT input into the claimed bottom-up derivation.
  • Chern-Simons coupling c = 5/2 for s=1 in D=4
    Set to (D-1)/2+s after ghost shifts to project the worldline Hilbert space onto the spin-1 sector. The relation depends on the quantization prescription and ghost contributions.
  • effective couplings c1, c2 = undetermined
    Introduced in Section 6 as non-minimal worldline effective interactions; their values are not fixed by the paper and they do not enter the central spin-1 result.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption BRST quantization is a valid quantization of the first-class constraint algebra (H, L, Lbar, Jc).
    Used throughout Sections 2.3, 3.1, and 5 to define the physical Hilbert space and identify the Proca field content.
  • domain assumption The worldline path integral on a circle with the Faddeev-Popov gauge-fixed measure equals the one-loop QFT effective action.
    Central identification in Sections 2.4 and 4; standard in the worldline formalism but not proven from the QFT side in this paper.
  • standard math The Gel'fand-Yaglom theorem correctly computes the needed functional determinants.
    Used in Appendix A to get Eq. (4.9); a standard result for second-order differential operators with Dirichlet boundary conditions.
  • domain assumption The Fock-Schwinger gauge truncation A_mu(xbar+t) = 1/2 t^nu F_nu_mu(xbar) is valid for constant backgrounds.
    Used in Eqs. (4.3)-(4.4) to make the path integral Gaussian; valid for constant F, but the paper does not justify the absence of boundary terms.
  • ad hoc to paper The free-theory path integral measure and normalization remain valid in the interacting BRST theory, including k=-1 fixed by matching scalar QFT.
    The interacting path integral (4.2) reuses the free determinants and normalization; this is the main imported input.
  • ad hoc to paper Nilpotency of the deformed BRST charge on the s=0,1 subspace is sufficient for a consistent spin-1 electromagnetic coupling.
    Section 3.2 restricts the nilpotency check to s<=1 and relies on annihilation-operator counting rather than a full cohomology proof.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Pair production of massive charged vector bosons from the worldline." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZRE7HKMA

@misc{pith2026250715943,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Pair production of massive charged vector bosons from the worldline},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZRE7HKMA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.15943}
}
abstract

We investigate a worldline formulation for a massive spin-1 particle interacting with an electromagnetic background. Two first-quantized descriptions of the spin degrees of freedom are considered: one based on bosonic oscillators and the other on fermionic oscillators. Focusing initially on the bosonic model -- which can accommodate particles of arbitrary integer spin -- we review how quantization in the spin-1 sector, performed both via Dirac's method and BRST quantization, reproduces the free Proca field theory. We then introduce coupling to an external electromagnetic field and demonstrate that Maxwell's equations for the background emerge as a consistency condition for the nilpotency of the BRST charge on the spin-1 sector. Encouraged by this result, which proves the viability of the particle model, we proceed to construct a path integral quantization of the worldline action for the charged spin-1 particle on the circle. This yields the one-loop effective Lagrangian for a constant electromagnetic field induced by a massive charged vector boson. As expected, the result reveals a vacuum instability, which we quantify by deriving the pair production rate for the vector bosons, recovering previous results obtained in quantum field theory. For comparison, we repeat the analysis using the standard $\mathcal{N}=2$ spinning particle model, which contains fermionic worldline degrees of freedom, finding identical results. Finally, we comment on possible extensions of the worldline models to include effective interactions and briefly explore their implications for pair production.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Worldline Images for Yang-Mills Theory within Boundaries

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    A worldline image method is developed for the Yang-Mills effective action with boundaries, checked via the first three Seeley-DeWitt coefficients and applied to chromoelectric gluon production.

  2. Gluon amplitudes in first quantization

    hep-th 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A bosonic spinning particle model with BRST-extracted vertex operators yields tree-level gluon amplitudes as worldline correlators.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    J. S. Schwinger, ‘On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization,’ Phys. Rev. , vol. 82, K. A. Milton, Ed., pp. 664–679, 1951. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.82.664

    doi:10.1103/physrev.82.664 1951

  2. [2]

    G. V. Dunne and C. Schubert, ‘Worldline instantons and pair production in inhomogeneous fields,’ Phys. Rev. D , vol. 72, p. 105 004, 2005. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.72.105004 . arXiv: hep-th/0507174

    arXiv 2005

  3. [3]

    Schutzhold, H

    R. Schutzhold, H. Gies, and G. Dunne, ‘Dynamically assisted Schwinger mechanism,’ Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 101, p. 130 404, 2008. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.130404 . arXiv: 0807.0754 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2008

  4. [4]

    M. J. Strassler, ‘Field theory without Feynman diagrams: One loop effective actions,’ Nucl. Phys. B , vol. 385, pp. 145–184, 1992. doi: 10.1016/0550- 3213(92)90098- V. arXiv: hep- ph/9205205

    arXiv 1992

  5. [5]

    Schubert, ‘Perturbative quantum field theory in the string inspired formalism,’ Phys

    C. Schubert, ‘Perturbative quantum field theory in the string inspired formalism,’ Phys. Rept., vol. 355, pp. 73–234, 2001. doi: 10.1016/S0370-1573(01)00013-8 . arXiv: hep-th/0101036

    arXiv 2001

  6. [6]

    Bastianelli and C

    F. Bastianelli and C. Schubert, Worldline Path Integarls and Quantum Field Theory . 2025, in preparation (CUP)

    2025

  7. [7]

    Ahmadiniaz, V

    N. Ahmadiniaz, V. M. Banda Guzm´ an, F. Bastianelli, O. Corradini, J. P. Edwards, and C. Schubert, ‘Worldline master formulas for the dressed electron propagator. Part I. Off-shell amplitudes,’ JHEP, vol. 08, no. 08, p. 049, 2020. doi: 10 . 1007 / JHEP08(2020 ) 018. arXiv: 2004.01391 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    Ahmadiniaz, V

    N. Ahmadiniaz, V. M. B. Guzman, F. Bastianelli, O. Corradini, J. P. Edwards, and C. Schubert, ‘Worldline master formulas for the dressed electron propagator. Part 2. On-shell amplitudes,’ JHEP, vol. 01, p. 050, 2022. doi: 10.1007/JHEP01(2022)050. arXiv: 2107.00199 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2022

Show all 90 references
  1. [9]

    I. K. Affleck, O. Alvarez, and N. S. Manton, ‘Pair Production at Strong Coupling in Weak External Fields,’ Nucl. Phys. B , vol. 197, pp. 509–519, 1982. doi: 10.1016/0550- 3213(82) 90455-2

    1982 doi

  2. [10]

    G. V. Dunne, Q.-h. Wang, H. Gies, and C. Schubert, ‘Worldline instantons. II. The Fluctuation prefactor,’ Phys. Rev. D, vol. 73, p. 065 028, 2006. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.73.065028. arXiv: hep-th/0602176. 13The prefactors hidden in “ ∝” are taken care of by normalizing with the ...

    2006 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Amat, L.-N

    O. Amat, L.-N. Hu, A. Sawut, M. Mohamedsedik, M. A. Bake, and B. S. Xie, ‘Schwinger pair production rate and time for some space-dependent electromagnetic fields via worldline instantons formalism,’ Apr. 2022. doi: 10.1140/epjd/s10053- 022- 00519- y. arXiv: 2204. 07263 [hep-ph]

    2022 doi

  4. [12]

    Degli Esposti and G

    G. Degli Esposti and G. Torgrimsson, ‘Worldline instantons for the momentum spectrum of Schwinger pair production in spacetime dependent fields,’ Phys. Rev. D , vol. 107, no. 5, p. 056 019, 2023. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.056019. arXiv: 2212.11578 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Fecit, S

    F. Fecit, S. A. Franchino-Vi˜ nas, and F. D. Mazzitelli, ‘Resummed effective actions and heat kernels: the Worldline approach and Yukawa assisted pair creation,’ JHEP, vol. 07, p. 041,

  6. [14]

    Bastianelli, O

    F. Bastianelli, O. Corradini, J. P. Edwards, D. G. C. McKeon, and C. Schubert, ‘Unified worldline treatment of Yukawa and axial couplings,’ JHEP, vol. 11, p. 152, 2024. doi: 10 . 1007/JHEP11(2024)152. arXiv: 2406.19988 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Gould, D

    O. Gould, D. L. .-. Ho, and A. Rajantie, ‘Schwinger pair production of magnetic monopoles: Momentum distribution for heavy-ion collisions,’ Phys. Rev. D, vol. 104, no. 1, p. 015 033, 2021. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.015033. arXiv: 2103.14454 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Heisenberg and H

    W. Heisenberg and H. Euler, ‘Consequences of Dirac’s theory of positrons,’ Z. Phys. , vol. 98, no. 11-12, pp. 714–732, 1936. doi: 10.1007/BF01343663. arXiv: physics/0605038

    1936 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Weisskopf, ‘The electrodynamics of the vacuum based on the quantum theory of the elec- tron,’ Kong

    V. Weisskopf, ‘The electrodynamics of the vacuum based on the quantum theory of the elec- tron,’ Kong. Dan. Vid. Sel. Mat. Fys. Med. , vol. 14N6, no. 6, pp. 1–39, 1936

    1936

  10. [18]

    V. S. Vanyashin and M. V. Terentev, ‘The Vacuum Polarization of a Charged Vector Field,’ Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. , vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 565–573, 1965

    1965

  11. [19]

    G. V. Dunne, ‘Heisenberg-Euler effective Lagrangians: Basics and extensions,’ in From fields to strings: Circumnavigating theoretical physics. Ian Kogan memorial collection (3 volume set) , M. Shifman, A. Vainshtein, and J. Wheater, Eds. Jun. 2004, pp. 445–522. doi: 10 . 1142 ...

    2004 arXiv

  12. [20]

    G. V. Dunne, ‘The Heisenberg-Euler Effective Action: 75 years on,’ Int. J. Mod. Phys. A , vol. 27, M. Asorey, M. Bordag, and E. Elizalde, Eds., p. 1 260 004, 2012. doi: 10 . 1142 / S0217751X12600044. arXiv: 1202.1557 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Weinberg and E

    S. Weinberg and E. Witten, ‘Limits on Massless Particles,’ Phys. Lett. B , vol. 96, pp. 59–62,

  14. [22]

    Proca, ‘Sur la theorie ondulatoire des electrons positifs et negatifs,’ J

    A. Proca, ‘Sur la theorie ondulatoire des electrons positifs et negatifs,’ J. Phys. Radium, vol. 7, pp. 347–353, 1936. doi: 10.1051/jphysrad:0193600708034700

    1936 doi

  15. [23]

    F. A. Berezin and M. S. Marinov, ‘Particle Spin Dynamics as the Grassmann Variant of Clas- sical Mechanics,’ Annals Phys., vol. 104, p. 336, 1977. doi: 10.1016/0003-4916(77)90335-9

    1977 doi

  16. [24]

    Barducci, R

    A. Barducci, R. Casalbuoni, and L. Lusanna, ‘Supersymmetries and the Pseudoclassical Rela- tivistic electron,’ Nuovo Cim. A , vol. 35, p. 377, 1976. doi: 10.1007/BF02730291. 29

    1976 doi

  17. [25]

    Brink, S

    L. Brink, S. Deser, B. Zumino, P. Di Vecchia, and P. S. Howe, ‘Local Supersymmetry for Spinning Particles,’ Phys. Lett. B, vol. 64, A. Salam and E. Sezgin, Eds., p. 435, 1976, [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 68, 488 (1977)]. doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(76)90115-5

    1977 doi

  18. [26]

    V. D. Gershun and V. I. Tkach, ‘Classical and quantum dynamics of particles with arbitrary spins,’ JETP Lett., vol. 29, pp. 288–291, 1979

    1979

  19. [27]

    P. S. Howe, S. Penati, M. Pernici, and P. K. Townsend, ‘A Particle Mechanics Description of Antisymmetric Tensor Fields,’ Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 6, p. 1125, 1989. doi: 10.1088/0264- 9381/6/8/012

    1989 doi

  20. [28]

    Dai, Y.-t

    P. Dai, Y.-t. Huang, and W. Siegel, ‘Worldgraph Approach to Yang-Mills Amplitudes from N=2 Spinning Particle,’ JHEP, vol. 10, p. 027, 2008. doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/10/027. arXiv: 0807.0391 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Bonezzi, A

    R. Bonezzi, A. Meyer, and I. Sachs, ‘Einstein gravity from the N = 4 spinning particle,’ JHEP, vol. 10, p. 025, 2018. doi: 10.1007/JHEP10(2018)025. arXiv: 1807.07989 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Bonezzi, A

    R. Bonezzi, A. Meyer, and I. Sachs, ‘A Worldline Theory for Supergravity,’ JHEP, vol. 06, p. 103, 2020. doi: 10.1007/JHEP06(2020)103. arXiv: 2004.06129 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Carosi and I

    M. Carosi and I. Sachs, ‘Proca theory from the spinning worldline,’ JHEP, vol. 01, p. 135,

  24. [32]

    Fecit, ‘Massive gravity from a first-quantized perspective,’ Eur

    F. Fecit, ‘Massive gravity from a first-quantized perspective,’ Eur. Phys. J. C , vol. 84, no. 4, p. 445, 2024. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12799-2 . arXiv: 2312.15428 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Henneaux and C

    M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, ‘First and second quantized point particles of any spin,’ in 2nd Meeting on Quantum Mechanics of Fundamental Systems (CECS) , 1987

    1987

  26. [34]

    Barnich, M

    G. Barnich, M. Grigoriev, A. Semikhatov, and I. Tipunin, ‘Parent field theory and unfolding in BRST first-quantized terms,’ Commun. Math. Phys. , vol. 260, pp. 147–181, 2005. doi: 10. 1007/s00220-005-1408-4 . arXiv: hep-th/0406192

    2005 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Hallowell and A

    K. Hallowell and A. Waldron, ‘Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics and Super-Lichnerowicz Algebras,’ Commun. Math. Phys. , vol. 278, pp. 775–801, 2008. doi: 10.1007/s00220- 007- 0393-1. arXiv: hep-th/0702033

    2008 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Bastianelli, O

    F. Bastianelli, O. Corradini, and A. Waldron, ‘Detours and Paths: BRST Complexes and Worldline Formalism,’ JHEP, vol. 05, p. 017, 2009. doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/2009/05/017 . arXiv: 0902.0530 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Bonezzi, ‘Yang-Mills theory from the worldline,’ Phys

    R. Bonezzi, ‘Yang-Mills theory from the worldline,’ Phys. Rev. D , vol. 110, no. 6, p. 065 022,

  30. [38]

    Haddad, G

    K. Haddad, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, and J. Plefka, ‘Spinning bodies in general relativity from bosonic worldline oscillators,’ JHEP, vol. 02, p. 019, 2025. doi: 10.1007/JHEP02(2025)019 . arXiv: 2411.08176 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Hoogeveen, G

    J. Hoogeveen, G. U. Jakobsen, and J. Plefka, ‘Spinning the Probe in Kerr with WQFT,’ Jun

  32. [40]

    Bastianelli, P

    F. Bastianelli, P. Benincasa, and S. Giombi, ‘Worldline approach to vector and antisymmetric tensor fields,’ JHEP, vol. 04, p. 010, 2005. doi: 10.1088/1126- 6708/2005/04/010 . arXiv: hep-th/0503155

    2005 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Bastianelli, P

    F. Bastianelli, P. Benincasa, and S. Giombi, ‘Worldline approach to vector and antisymmetric tensor fields. II.,’ JHEP, vol. 10, p. 114, 2005. doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/2005/10/114. arXiv: hep-th/0510010

    2005 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Bastianelli, R

    F. Bastianelli, R. Bonezzi, O. Corradini, and F. Fecit, ‘Gluon amplitudes in first quantization,’ to appear

  35. [43]

    Bastianelli, R

    F. Bastianelli, R. Bonezzi, O. Corradini, and E. Latini, ‘Particles with non abelian charges,’ JHEP, vol. 10, p. 098, 2013. doi: 10.1007/JHEP10(2013)098. arXiv: 1309.1608 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  36. [44]

    arXiv: 2506.14626 [hep-th]. 30

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    Bastianelli, F

    F. Bastianelli, F. Comberiati, and L. de la Cruz, ‘Worldline description of a bi-adjoint scalar and the zeroth copy,’ JHEP, vol. 12, p. 023, 2021. doi: 10.1007/JHEP12(2021)023 . arXiv: 2107.10130 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Siegel, Introduction to string field theory

    W. Siegel, Introduction to string field theory . 1988, vol. 8. arXiv: hep-th/0107094

    1988 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Bastianelli, R

    F. Bastianelli, R. Bonezzi, O. Corradini, and E. Latini, ‘Massive and massless higher spinning particles in odd dimensions,’ JHEP, vol. 09, p. 158, 2014. doi: 10.1007/JHEP09(2014)158 . arXiv: 1407.4950 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Bastianelli, R

    F. Bastianelli, R. Bonezzi, O. Corradini, and E. Latini, ‘Spinning particles and higher spin field equations,’ J. Phys. Conf. Ser. , vol. 1208, no. 1, A. Bashir and C. Schubert, Eds., p. 012 006,

  41. [49]

    Bastianelli, R

    F. Bastianelli, R. Bonezzi, O. Corradini, E. Latini, and K. H. Ould-Lahoucine, ‘A worldline approach to colored particles,’ J. Phys. Conf. Ser. , vol. 1208, no. 1, A. Bashir and C. Schubert, Eds., p. 012 004, 2019. doi: 10 . 1088 / 1742 - 6596 / 1208 / 1 / 012004. arXiv: 1504 ...

    2019

  42. [50]

    A. K. H. Bengtsson, ‘An Abstract interface to higher spin gauge field theory,’ J. Math. Phys. , vol. 46, p. 042 312, 2005. doi: 10.1063/1.1867976. arXiv: hep-th/0403267

    2005 arXiv

  43. [51]

    E. C. G. Stueckelberg, ‘Theory of the radiation of photons of small arbitrary mass,’ Helv. Phys. Acta, vol. 30, pp. 209–215, 1957

    1957

  44. [52]

    van Dam and M

    H. van Dam and M. J. G. Veltman, ‘Massive and massless Yang-Mills and gravitational fields,’ Nucl. Phys. B , vol. 22, pp. 397–411, 1970. doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(70)90416-5

    1970 doi

  45. [53]

    V. I. Zakharov, ‘Linearized gravitation theory and the graviton mass,’ JETP Lett. , vol. 12, p. 312, 1970

    1970

  46. [54]

    I. M. Gelfand and A. M. Yaglom, ‘Integration in functional spaces and it applications in quan- tum physics,’ J. Math. Phys. , vol. 1, p. 48, 1960. doi: 10.1063/1.1703636

    1960 doi

  47. [55]

    Bastianelli, O

    F. Bastianelli, O. Corradini, and E. Latini, ‘Higher spin fields from a worldline perspective,’ JHEP, vol. 02, p. 072, 2007. doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/02/072. arXiv: hep-th/0701055

    2007 arXiv

  48. [56]

    S. A. Franchino-Vi˜ nas, C. Garc ´ ıa-P´ erez, F. D. Mazzitelli, V. Vitagliano, and U. W. Haimovichi, ‘Resummed heat kernel and effective action for Yukawa and QED,’ Phys. Lett. B , vol. 854, p. 138 684, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138684. arXiv: 2312.16303 [hep-th]

    2024

  49. [57]

    S. A. Franchino-Vi˜ nas, ‘Comment on ‘Index-free heat kernel coefficients’,’ Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 41, no. 12, p. 128 001, 2024. doi: 10 . 1088 / 1361 - 6382 / ad4949. arXiv: 2401 . 01296 [hep-th]

    2024

  50. [58]

    Luscher, K

    M. Luscher, K. Symanzik, and P. Weisz, ‘Anomalies of the free loop wave equation in the WKB approximation,’ Nucl. Phys. B , vol. 173, p. 365, 1980. doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(80)90009-7

    1980 doi

  51. [59]

    Luscher, ‘Symmetry breaking aspects of the roughening transition in gauge theories,’ Nucl

    M. Luscher, ‘Symmetry breaking aspects of the roughening transition in gauge theories,’ Nucl. Phys. B , vol. 180, pp. 317–329, 1981. doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(81)90423-5

    1981 doi

  52. [60]

    R. D. Pisarski, ‘Field theory of paths with a curvature-dependent term,’ Phys. Rev. D, vol. 34, pp. 670–673, 1986. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.34.670

    1986 doi

  53. [61]

    Fedotov et al

    A. Fedotov et al. , ‘Advances in QED with intense background fields,’ Phys. Rept., vol. 1010, pp. 1–138, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2023.01.003. arXiv: 2203.00019 [hep-ph]. 31

    2023 arXiv

  54. [62]

    M. Baig, J. Clua, and A. Jaramillo, ‘Numerical simulation of random paths with a curva- ture dependent action,’ Mod. Phys. Lett. A , vol. 13, pp. 2131–2138, 1998. doi: 10 . 1142 / S0217732398002254. arXiv: hep-lat/9607039

    1998 arXiv

  55. [63]

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein, ‘An effective field theory of gravity for extended objects,’ Phys. Rev. D , vol. 73, p. 104 029, 2006. doi: 10 . 1103 / PhysRevD . 73 . 104029. arXiv: hep - th/0409156

    2006

  56. [64]

    W. D. Goldberger, ‘Les Houches lectures on effective field theories and gravitational radiation,’ in Les Houches Summer School - Session 86: Particle Physics and Cosmology: The Fabric of Spacetime, Jan. 2007. arXiv: hep-ph/0701129

    2007 arXiv

  57. [65]

    R. A. Porto, ‘The effective field theorist’s approach to gravitational dynamics,’ Phys. Rept. , vol. 633, pp. 1–104, 2016. doi: 10 . 1016 / j . physrep . 2016 . 04 . 003. arXiv: 1601 . 04914 [hep-th]

    2016

  58. [66]

    S. L. Lebedev and V. I. Ritus, ‘Virial representation of the imaginary part of the Lagrange function of the electromagnetic field,’ Sov. Phys. JETP , vol. 59, pp. 237–244, 1984

    1984

  59. [67]

    Awada and D

    M. Awada and D. Zoller, ‘Phase transition in rigid string coupled to Kalb-Ramond fields,’ Phys. Lett. B , vol. 325, pp. 115–118, 1994. doi: 10.1016/0370- 2693(94)90079- 5. arXiv: hep-th/9404077

    1994 arXiv

  60. [68]

    V. V. Skalozub, ‘Nonpolynomial Counterterm in the xi Limiting Formalism,’ Sov. J. Nucl. Phys., vol. 23, pp. 597–598, 1976

    1976

  61. [69]

    Dittrich and M

    W. Dittrich and M. Reuter, ‘Effective QCD Lagrangian With Zeta Function Regularization,’ Phys. Lett. B , vol. 128, pp. 321–326, 1983. doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(83)90268-X

    1983 doi

  62. [70]

    Reuter and W

    M. Reuter and W. Dittrich, ‘Symmetry restoration by a magnetic field at high temperature,’ Phys. Lett. B , vol. 144, pp. 99–104, 1984. doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(84)90184-9. 32

    1984 doi

  63. [71]

    S. K. Blau, M. Visser, and A. Wipf, ‘Analytical Results for the Effective Action,’ Int. J. Mod. Phys. A , vol. 6, pp. 5409–5433, 1991. doi: 10.1142/S0217751X91002549 . arXiv: 0906.2851 [hep-th]

    1991 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Jikia and A

    G. Jikia and A. Tkabladze, ‘Photon-photon scattering at the photon linear collider,’ Phys. Lett. B , vol. 323, pp. 453–458, 1994. doi: 10 . 1016 / 0370 - 2693(94 ) 91246 - 7. arXiv: hep - ph/9312228

    1994

  65. [73]

    I. A. Batalin, S. G. Matinyan, and G. K. Savvidy, ‘Vacuum Polarization by a Source-Free Gauge Field,’ Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. , vol. 26, p. 214, 1977

    1977

  66. [74]

    Henriksson, B

    J. Henriksson, B. McPeak, F. Russo, and A. Vichi, ‘Rigorous bounds on light-by-light scat- tering,’ JHEP, vol. 06, p. 158, 2022. doi: 10 . 1007 / JHEP06(2022 ) 158. arXiv: 2107 . 13009 [hep-th]

    2022

  67. [75]

    Alviani and A

    E. Alviani and A. Falkowski, ‘Matching and positivity beyond minimal coupling in effective theories of photons and gravitons,’ Eur. Phys. J. C , vol. 85, no. 2, p. 154, 2025. doi: 10.1140/ epjc/s10052-025-13879-7 . arXiv: 2408.03439 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Reuter, M

    M. Reuter, M. G. Schmidt, and C. Schubert, ‘Constant external fields in gauge theory and the spin 0, 1/2, 1 path integrals,’ Annals Phys., vol. 259, pp. 313–365, 1997. doi: 10.1006/aphy. 1997.5716. arXiv: hep-th/9610191

    1997

  69. [77]

    Bastianelli, R

    F. Bastianelli, R. Bonezzi, O. Corradini, and E. Latini, ‘One-loop quantum gravity from the N = 4 spinning particle,’ JHEP, vol. 11, p. 124, 2019. doi: 10.1007/JHEP11(2019)124. arXiv: 1909.05750 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Bastianelli, R

    F. Bastianelli, R. Bonezzi, and M. Melis, ‘Gauge-invariant coefficients in perturbative quantum gravity,’ Eur. Phys. J. C , vol. 82, no. 12, p. 1139, 2022. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052- 022- 11119-w. arXiv: 2206.13287 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Pˇ reuˇ cil and J

    F. Pˇ reuˇ cil and J. Hoˇ rejˇ s ´ ı, ‘Effective Euler–Heisenberg Lagrangians in models of QED,’J. Phys. G, vol. 45, no. 8, p. 085 005, 2018. doi: 10 . 1088 / 1361 - 6471 / aace90. arXiv: 1707 . 08106 [hep-ph]

    2018

  72. [80]

    Fecit, ‘Worldline path integral for the massive graviton,’ Eur

    F. Fecit, ‘Worldline path integral for the massive graviton,’ Eur. Phys. J. C , vol. 84, no. 3, p. 339, 2024. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12707-8 . arXiv: 2402.13766 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Bonezzi and M

    R. Bonezzi and M. F. Kallimani, ‘Worldline geometries for scattering amplitudes,’ JHEP, vol. 06, p. 167, 2025. doi: 10.1007/JHEP06(2025)167. arXiv: 2502.18030 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  74. [82]

    G. V. Dunne, ‘Functional determinants in quantum field theory,’ J. Phys. A , vol. 41, M. Gadella, J. M. Izquierdo, S. Kuru, J. Negro, and M. A. del Olmo, Eds., p. 304 006, 2008. doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/41/30/304006. arXiv: 0711.1178 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Kirsten and A

    K. Kirsten and A. J. McKane, ‘Functional determinants by contour integration methods,’ Annals Phys. , vol. 308, pp. 502–527, 2003. doi: 10.1016/S0003- 4916(03)00149- 0. arXiv: math-ph/0305010. 33

    2003 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Kirsten and A

    K. Kirsten and A. J. McKane, ‘Functional determinants for general Sturm-Liouville problems,’ J. Phys. A , vol. 37, pp. 4649–4670, 2004. doi: 10 . 1088 / 0305 - 4470 / 37 / 16 / 014. arXiv: math-ph/0403050. 34

    2004 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Bastianelli, F

    F. Bastianelli, F. Comberiati, F. Fecit, and F. Ori, ‘Six-dimensional one-loop divergences in quantum gravity from the N = 4 spinning particle,’ JHEP, vol. 10, p. 152, 2023. doi: 10. 1007/JHEP10(2023)152. arXiv: 2307.09353 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  78. [1980]

    doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(80)90212-9

    doi

  79. [2019]

    arXiv: 1504.02683 [hep-th]

    doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1208/1/012006. arXiv: 1504.02683 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  80. [2022]

    arXiv: 2110.10573 [hep-th]

    doi: 10.1007/JHEP01(2022)135. arXiv: 2110.10573 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  81. [2024]

    arXiv: 2406.19045 [hep-th]

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.065022. arXiv: 2406.19045 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  82. [2025]

    arXiv: 2501.17094 [hep-th]

    doi: 10.1007/JHEP07(2025)041. arXiv: 2501.17094 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.