Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 37 references

Toward a Real-Time Framework for Accurate Monocular 3D Human Pose Estimation with Geometric Priors

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes a lightweight 2D-to-3D lifting framework that feeds camera intrinsics and person-specific segment lengths into a compact Transformer, aiming to make accurate monocular 3D human pose estimation fast, personalized, and…

desk verdict A candid, well-written research proposal that contains no experiments or new results; its central claim depends on untested auto-calibration priors, so it's not yet a scientific contribution. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.16850 v1 pith:GDOSYUGT submitted 2025-07-21 cs.CV cs.AI

Mohamed Adjel (LAAS) This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords monocular3Dhumanposeestimation2D-to-3Dliftinggeometricpriorscameraself-calibrationanatomicalbiomechanicalconstraintsreal-timeinferencelightweighttransformer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the bottleneck in monocular 3D human pose estimation is not 2D keypoint detection but lifting those keypoints to 3D, and that lifting can be made both fast and accurate by explicitly conditioning on geometric priors: known camera intrinsics and person-specific anatomical segment lengths. It proposes a training pipeline that uses biomechanically constrained inverse kinematics to filter implausible poses from MoCap and synthetic datasets, simulates many perspective views under known intrinsics to generate 2D-3D pairs, and trains a compact Transformer to lift 2D poses to 3D. The camera and body priors are to be obtained automatically from monocular video using recent self-calibration and single-view shape methods, eliminating chessboard calibration and multi-camera setups. If the framework works, real-time personalized 3D pose estimation could run on edge devices and wearable robots without specialized hardware. The paper is a proposal; it lays out the components and leaves the empirical validation to future work.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is 2D-to-3D keypoint lifting conditioned on geometric priors. In the proposed framework, a compact Transformer treats each 2D keypoint as an input token and appends camera intrinsics and anatomical segment lengths as additional tokens or part of a global embedding; the training data is generated by projecting biomechanically filtered 3D poses through simulated perspective cameras with known intrinsics. This makes the network explicitly aware of the projective geometry and the subject's body proportions, which is what resolves the depth ambiguity that makes monocular lifting hard.

What would settle it

Run the proposed pipeline on a standard in-the-wild benchmark such as 3DPW using only raw monocular video with no calibration step, and compare against a plain 2D-to-3D lifting baseline; if the geometry-conditioned model does not beat it on 3D joint error, the central claim fails. A more direct check: feed the network incorrect intrinsics (e.g., a wrong focal length) and measure whether the 3D error degrades; if it does not, the priors are not doing the claimed work.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that the ill-posed 2D-to-3D lifting problem can be made well-posed enough for real-time deployment by supplying the network with two pieces of geometric information that are now obtainable automatically from plain video: the camera intrinsics and the subject's anatomical segment lengths. The paper claims that with these priors, a lightweight Transformer trained on biomechanically filtered MoCap and synthetic data under simulated perspective projections can lift 2D keypoints to accurate 3D poses in real time, personalizing to each user without calibration targets. The expected result is a marked improvement in accuracy and interpretability over prior lifting methods that ignore camera and body priors, at a fraction of the compute of direct image-to-3D regression.

Load-bearing premise

The framework assumes that camera intrinsics and person-specific segment lengths can be recovered reliably from monocular video in unconstrained conditions, and that these recovered values are accurate enough to condition the lifting network.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Self-calibration from raw video replaces chessboard calibration, so 3D pose estimation can be deployed in unconstrained environments.
  • Because segment lengths are person-specific, the same model can adapt to individual users, supporting wearable robotics and assistive devices.
  • Biomechanical filtering of training data removes implausible poses from synthetic and MoCap corpora, which should make trained networks more robust in the wild.
  • A compact Transformer with geometric priors can run in real time on edge devices, avoiding the heavy compute of image-to-3D regression.
  • The same 2D-3D pair generation under simulated intrinsics can be used to create large-scale training corpora without new image annotations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the self-calibration step is accurate enough, the framework could be extended to multi-person scenes by applying the per-person anatomical prior and a shared camera model, a setting the paper does not address.
  • The proposed pipeline implicitly assumes that segment lengths are stable across a video; a testable extension would lift sequences with time-varying priors to handle growing children or weight change.
  • One could test the contribution of each prior separately by ablating camera intrinsics and segment-length tokens; the paper does not report such an ablation.
  • The data-generation scheme resembles a domain-randomization approach for 3D pose, suggesting it could transfer to unseen cameras or unusual body proportions better than models trained on fixed datasets.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a framework for monocular 3D human pose estimation based on 2D-to-3D lifting, augmented with camera intrinsics and subject-specific anatomical priors. The pipeline consists of biomechanically constrained inverse kinematics to filter MoCap and synthetic data, simulated perspective-view augmentation, a compact Transformer-based lifting network, and automatic estimation of camera and anatomical priors from monocular video via recent self-calibration methods. No implementation, experiments, or quantitative evaluation are reported. The paper explicitly frames itself as a preliminary proposition whose goal is to foster discussion.

Significance. If the proposed components were realized and validated, the framework could offer a useful lightweight alternative for real-time 3D pose estimation on edge devices, and it could address an important limitation of current 2D-to-3D lifting methods, namely the absence of camera and personalized anatomical priors in unconstrained settings. The paper is clearly written, identifies a relevant bottleneck, and makes reasonable use of prior work, including the author's own [26, 35] as building blocks rather than as evidence for the present proposal. The main weakness is that the central claims of accuracy, personalization, and real-time performance are entirely unsupported: every supporting statement is either a plan or a citation, and no component is tested even in isolation.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section II, Automatic Camera and Anatomical Priors] The claimed advantage over plain 2D-to-3D lifting rests on the reliability of camera intrinsics and subject-specific segment lengths recovered automatically from monocular video. The manuscript states only that methods [29], [32], [33] "will be compared" or "will be evaluated," and provides no evidence about their accuracy on pose-diverse or moving-camera footage. Since errors in focal length or body-shape estimates inject a metric scale bias into the lifting target, the framework could perform worse than scale-normalized lifting without priors. An end-to-end comparison with and without priors on a benchmark such as Human3.6M or 3DPW, plus a sensitivity analysis for focal-length and segment-length errors, is necessary to support the central claim.
  2. [General (all sections)] The paper contains no experiments, no quantitative results, and no implementation. The abstract's phrase "can enable fast, personalized, and accurate 3D pose estimation" and the conclusion's statement that the framework "enables real-time and accurate 3D human pose estimation" are therefore not established. At a minimum, the authors need to provide benchmark accuracy, runtime, model size, and ablations for each component, and compare against existing lifting methods [22, 24] and direct regression methods [11, 12, 15]. Without such evidence the paper is a research proposal rather than a completed study.
  3. [Section II, Lightweight Transformer for 2D-to-3D Lifting] The proposed Transformer architecture is described only at a high level: keypoints become tokens and camera or anatomical parameters are "encoded as separate tokens or appended as part of a global embedding." There is no specification of the number of layers, heads, embedding dimensions, token construction, conditioning mechanism, loss function, or training schedule. This makes the design non-reproducible and prevents any assessment of whether the real-time claim is plausible.
  4. [Section II, Constrained IK and Data Augmentation] The data-generation pipeline is not described in sufficient detail to be evaluated. The manuscript does not state how the constrained IK is formulated (objective, constraints, solver), how "plausible" poses are filtered, how random camera intrinsics/extrinsics are sampled, or how segment lengths are varied in augmentation. The claim that this strategy "exposes our lifting model to a wider range of human morphologies" is a hypothesis, not a demonstrated result. A precise protocol or pseudocode, together with a validation of the generated 2D-3D pairs, is needed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title page / Author block] The author affiliation contains "T eam" with an extra space, and the funding footnote placeholder "Identify applicable funding agency here" should be removed or filled in.
  2. [References] References [2] and [20] are the same BlazePose paper and should not be duplicated; please consolidate them.
  3. [Section I] There is a typo in the phrase "weak perspective approahces" (should be "approaches").
  4. [Figure 1] The manuscript references a figure available as "fig1.png" but never mentions or discusses a figure in the text; either include a numbered figure with a caption and refer to it, or remove the figure from the submission package.
  5. [Throughout] The text mixes indicative claims ("enables"), conditional proposals ("we propose to"), and speculative statements ("could"). Since the paper is explicitly preliminary, it would help to use a consistent modality, such as "we plan to show" or "this proposal hypothesizes," to avoid overclaiming in the abstract and conclusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: this is a proposal paper with no derivation, fitting, or prediction that reduces to its inputs; self-citations are non-load-bearing building blocks.

full rationale

The paper is an explicit research proposal rather than a derivation or evaluation: Section I states 'This preliminary proposition aims to spark discussion,' and the abstract describes what the framework 'can enable' under favorable assumptions. There are no equations, no fitted parameters, no numerical experiments, and no claimed theorem whose conclusion could coincide with an input by construction. The only self-citations ([26] and [35]) are used in Section II as prior methodological building blocks for constrained inverse kinematics and spatio-temporal filtering ('incorporating spatio-temporal continuity constraints to filter out implausible poses [26], [35]'); they are not invoked as evidence that the proposed framework achieves accuracy, and the central biomechanical model SKEL [34] is external work from other authors. The automatic camera and anatomical prior stage is explicitly framed as planned evaluation ('we plan to evaluate recent self-calibration methods', 'we will also leverage short video segments'), so no accuracy claim is being derived from those priors. The lack of end-to-end validation of the 'accurate, real-time, personalized' goal is a correctness and completeness limitation, not circularity. Therefore the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper proposes no free parameters or new entities. The central claim rests on four domain assumptions about the reliability of the priors, the transfer of synthetic data, the real-time feasibility of the transformer, and the accuracy of self-calibration. Each is plausible but unvalidated.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption SKEL biomechanical model [34] with constrained IK [26], [35] filters out biomechanically implausible poses while preserving valid diversity in training data.
    Used in Section II to justify data quality; no experiment shows filtered MoCap still covers the real pose distribution.
  • domain assumption Random synthetic perspective projections of 3D poses produce 2D-3D pairs that generalize to real in-the-wild images.
    Invoked in Section II data augmentation; sim-to-real transfer is assumed without evidence.
  • domain assumption Compact Transformer models with tokenized priors can achieve real-time inference on edge devices while retaining accuracy.
    Invoked in Section II lightweight transformer; no latency or accuracy measurements are provided.
  • domain assumption Camera intrinsics and body shape can be estimated accurately from raw monocular video using the cited self-calibration methods.
    Invoked in Section II automatic priors; accuracy of these methods in unconstrained settings is not evaluated here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Toward a Real-Time Framework for Accurate Monocular 3D Human Pose Estimation with Geometric Priors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GDOSYUGT

@misc{pith2026250716850,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Toward a Real-Time Framework for Accurate Monocular 3D Human Pose Estimation with Geometric Priors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GDOSYUGT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.16850}
}
read the original abstract

Monocular 3D human pose estimation remains a challenging and ill-posed problem, particularly in real-time settings and unconstrained environments. While direct imageto-3D approaches require large annotated datasets and heavy models, 2D-to-3D lifting offers a more lightweight and flexible alternative-especially when enhanced with prior knowledge. In this work, we propose a framework that combines real-time 2D keypoint detection with geometry-aware 2D-to-3D lifting, explicitly leveraging known camera intrinsics and subject-specific anatomical priors. Our approach builds on recent advances in self-calibration and biomechanically-constrained inverse kinematics to generate large-scale, plausible 2D-3D training pairs from MoCap and synthetic datasets. We discuss how these ingredients can enable fast, personalized, and accurate 3D pose estimation from monocular images without requiring specialized hardware. This proposal aims to foster discussion on bridging data-driven learning and model-based priors to improve accuracy, interpretability, and deployability of 3D human motion capture on edge devices in the wild.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [29]

    Deep geometry- aware camera self-calibration from video

    Annika Hagemann, Moritz Knorr, and Christoph Stiller. Deep geometry- aware camera self-calibration from video. pages 3415–3425 , 10 2023

    work page 2023

  2. [32]

    Blade: Single- view body mesh learning through accurate depth estimation

    Shengze Wang, Jiefeng Li, Tianye Li, Y e Y uan, Henry Fuch s, Koki Nagano, Shalini Mello, and Michael Stengel. Blade: Single- view body mesh learning through accurate depth estimation. 12 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [33]

    Camerahmr: Aligning people with perspective, 11 2024

    Priyanka Patel and Michael Black. Camerahmr: Aligning people with perspective, 11 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [1]

    Real time multi- person 2d pose estimation using part affinity fields

    Zhe Cao, Tomas Simon, Shih-En Wei, and Y aser Sheikh. Real time multi- person 2d pose estimation using part affinity fields. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , 2017

    work page 2017

  5. [2]

    Blazepose: On-device re al-time body pose tracking

    V alentin Bazarevsky, Ivan Grishchenko, Karthik Raveen dran, Tyler Zhu, Fan Zhang, and Matthias Grundmann. Blazepose: On-device re al-time body pose tracking. 06 2020

    work page 2020

  6. [3]

    Rtmw: Real-time mu lti-person 2d and 3d whole-body pose estimation

    Tao Jiang, Xinchen Xie, and Yining Li. Rtmw: Real-time mu lti-person 2d and 3d whole-body pose estimation. 07 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [4]

    Human3.6m: Large scale datasets and predictive methods for 3d human sensing in natural environments

    Catalin Ionescu, Dragos Papava, Vlad Olaru, and Cristia n Sminchisescu. Human3.6m: Large scale datasets and predictive methods for 3d human sensing in natural environments. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , 36(7):1325–1339, 2014

    work page 2014

  8. [5]

    Vnect: Real-time 3d human pose estimat ion with a single rgb camera

    Dushyant Mehta, Srinath Sridhar, Oleksandr Sotnychenk o, Helge Rhodin, Mohammad Shafiei, Hans-Peter Seidel, Gerard Pons-M oll, and Christian Theobalt. Vnect: Real-time 3d human pose estimat ion with a single rgb camera. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , 36(4), 2017

    work page 2017

Show all 37 references
  1. [6]

    Black, Bo do Rosen- hahn, and Gerard Pons-Moll

    Timo V on Marcard, Roberto Henschel, Michael J. Black, Bo do Rosen- hahn, and Gerard Pons-Moll. Recovering accurate 3d human po se in the wild using imus and a moving camera. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) , 2018

    2018

  2. [7]

    Bedlam: A synthetic dataset for monocular 3d human pose esti mation in the wild

    Y uliang He, Hongwei Lin, Xin Fan, Yingcong Y ang, and Jing Zeng. Bedlam: A synthetic dataset for monocular 3d human pose esti mation in the wild. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.10449 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  3. [8]

    Lo ok ma, no markers: holistic performance capture without the hassl e

    Charlie Hewitt, Fatemeh Saleh, Sadegh Aliakbarian, Loh it Petikam, Shideh Rezaeifar, Louis Florentin, Zafiirah Hosenie, Thoma s Cashman, Julien V alentin, Darren Cosker, and Tadas Baltrusaitis. Lo ok ma, no markers: holistic performance capture without the hassl e. ACM Transact...

    2024

  4. [9]

    Matthew Loper, Naureen Mahmood, Javier Romero, Gerard P ons-Moll, and Michael J. Black. Smpl: A skinned multi-person linear mo del. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , 34(6):248:1–248:16, 2015

    2015

  5. [10]

    Georgios Pavlakos, V asileios Choutas, Nima Ghorbani, Timo Bolkart, Ahmed A. A. Osman, Dimitrios Tzionas, and Michael J. Black. E x- pressive body capture: 3D hands, face, and body from a single image. pages 10975–10985, 2019

    2019

  6. [11]

    Wham: Reconstructing world-grounded humans with accurate 3d mot ion

    Soyong Shin, Juyong Kim, Eni Halilaj, and Michael Black . Wham: Reconstructing world-grounded humans with accurate 3d mot ion. pages 2070–2080, 06 2024

    2024

  7. [12]

    Sat-hmr : Real-time multi-person 3d mesh estimation via scale-adaptive tokens

    Chi Su, Xiaoxuan Ma, Jiajun Su, and Yizhou Wang. Sat-hmr : Real-time multi-person 3d mesh estimation via scale-adaptive tokens . 11 2024

    2024

  8. [13]

    Tokenhmr: Advancing human mesh recovery with a tokenized po se representation

    Sai Dwivedi, Y u Sun, Priyanka Patel, Y ao Feng, and Micha el Black. Tokenhmr: Advancing human mesh recovery with a tokenized po se representation. pages 1323–1333, 06 2024

    2024

  9. [14]

    Hybrik: A hybrid analytical-neural inverse kinematics solution fo r 3d human pose and shape estimation

    Jiefeng Li, Chao Xu, Zhicun Chen, Siyuan Bian, and Cewu L u. Hybrik: A hybrid analytical-neural inverse kinematics solution fo r 3d human pose and shape estimation. pages 3382–3392, 06 2021

    2021

  10. [15]

    Neural locali zer fields for continuous 3d human pose and shape estimation

    Istv´ an S´ ar´ andi and Gerard Pons-Moll. Neural locali zer fields for continuous 3d human pose and shape estimation. 07 2024

    2024

  11. [16]

    Deep high- resolution representation learning for human pose estimation

    Ke Sun, Bin Xiao, Dong Liu, and Jingdong Wang. Deep high- resolution representation learning for human pose estimation. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , 2019

    2019

  12. [17]

    Vit pose++: Vision transformer for generic body pose estimation

    Y ufei Xu, Jing Zhang, Qiming Zhang, and Dacheng Tao. Vit pose++: Vision transformer for generic body pose estimation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , PP:1–18, 11 2023

    2023

  13. [18]

    Rtmpose: Real-time multi-pers on pose estimation based on mmpose

    Tao Jiang, Peng Lu, Li Zhang, Ningsheng Ma, Rui Han, Chen gqi Lyu, Yining Li, and Kai Chen. Rtmpose: Real-time multi-pers on pose estimation based on mmpose. 03 2023

    2023

  14. [19]

    Medi apipe hands: On-device real-time hand tracking

    Fan Zhang, V alentin Bazarevsky, Andrey V akunov, Andre i Tkachenka, George Sung, Chuo-Ling Chang, and Matthias Grundmann. Medi apipe hands: On-device real-time hand tracking. 06 2020

    2020

  15. [20]

    Blazepose: On-device re al-time body pose tracking

    V alentin Bazarevsky, Ivan Grishchenko, Karthik Ravee ndran, Tyler Zhu, Fan Zhang, and Matthias Grundmann. Blazepose: On-device re al-time body pose tracking. 06 2020

    2020

  16. [21]

    Troje, Ger ard Pons- Moll, and Michael J

    Naureen Mahmood, Nima Ghorbani, Nikolaus F. Troje, Ger ard Pons- Moll, and Michael J. Black. Amass: Archive of motion capture as surface shapes. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , 2019

    2019

  17. [22]

    Lifting 2d human po se to 3d with domain adapted 3d body concept

    Nie Qiang, Ziwei Liu, and Y unhui Liu. Lifting 2d human po se to 3d with domain adapted 3d body concept. International Journal of Computer Vision, 131:1–19, 02 2023

    2023

  18. [23]

    3d human pose estimat ion = 2d pose estimation + matching

    Ching-Hang Chen and Deva Ramanan. 3d human pose estimat ion = 2d pose estimation + matching. pages 5759–5767, 07 2017

    2017

  19. [24]

    Lifting motion to th e 3d world via 2d diffusion

    Jiaman Li, Karen Liu, and Jiajun Wu. Lifting motion to th e 3d world via 2d diffusion. 11 2024

    2024

  20. [25]

    Opencapbench: A benchmark to b ridge pose estimation and biomechanics

    Y oni Gozlan, Antoine Falisse, Scott Uhlrich, Anthony G atti, Michael Black, and Akshay Chaudhari. Opencapbench: A benchmark to b ridge pose estimation and biomechanics. 06 2024

    2024

  21. [26]

    Multi-mo dal upper limbs human motion estimation from a reduced set of aff ordable sensors

    Mohamed Adjel, Maxime Sabbah, Raphael Dumas, Nicolas M ansard, Samer Mohammed, Bruno Watier, and Vincent Bonnet. Multi-mo dal upper limbs human motion estimation from a reduced set of aff ordable sensors. pages 10926–10932, 10 2023

    2023

  22. [27]

    Osso: Obtaining skeletal shape from outside

    Marilyn Keller, Silvia Zuffi, Michael Black, and Sergi P ujades. Osso: Obtaining skeletal shape from outside. pages 20460–20469, 06 2022

    2022

  23. [28]

    Jiading Fang, Igor V asiljevic, Vitor Guizilini, Rares Ambrus, Greg Shakhnarovich, Adrien Gaidon, and Matthew R. Walter. Self- supervised camera self-calibration from video. page 8468–8475, 2022

    2022

  24. [30]

    Humannerf-se: A simple yet effective approach t o animate humannerf with diverse poses

    Caoyuan Ma, Y u-Lun Liu, Zhixiang Wang, Wu Liu, Xinchen L iu, and Zheng Wang. Humannerf-se: A simple yet effective approach t o animate humannerf with diverse poses. pages 1460–1470, 06 2024

    2024

  25. [31]

    Airnerf: 3d reconstruction of hum an with drone and nerf for future communication systems

    Alexey Kotcov, Maria Dronova, Vladislav Cheremnykh, S ausar Karaf, and Dzmitry Tsetserukou. Airnerf: 3d reconstruction of hum an with drone and nerf for future communication systems. 07 2024

    2024

  26. [34]

    Karen Liu, and Michael J

    Marilyn Keller, Keenon Werling, Soyong Shin, Scott Del p, Sergi Pu- jades, C. Karen Liu, and Michael J. Black. From skin to skelet on: Towards biomechanically accurate 3d digital humans. ACM Trans. Graph., 42(6), December 2023

    2023

  27. [35]

    Lower limbs human motion estimation from sparse multi-modal measureme nts

    Mohamed Adjel, Maxime Sabbah, Raphael Dumas, Marta Mir kov, Nicolas Mansard, Samer Mohammed, and Vincent Bonnet. Lower limbs human motion estimation from sparse multi-modal measureme nts. pages 401–406, 09 2024

    2024

  28. [36]

    Marker data enhancement for markerless motion c apture

    Antoine Falisse, Scott Uhlrich, Akshay Chaudhari, Jen nifer Hicks, and Scott Delp. Marker data enhancement for markerless motion c apture. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology , 07 2024

    2024

  29. [37]

    fig1.png

    Soyong Shin, Zhixiong Li, and Eni Halilaj. Markerless m otion tracking with noisy video and imu data. IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, PP , 05 2023. This figure "fig1.png" is available in "png" format from: http://arxiv.org/ps/2507.16850v1

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.