Thermal History of Non-equilibrated Scalars

Gopolang Mohlabeng; Michael Ratz; Tim M.P. Tait; V. Knapp-Perez

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 47 references

Thermal History of Non-equilibrated Scalars

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Thermal forces shrink a modulus-controlled quartic, making a dark Higgs phase transition stronger.

desk verdict A clean new application of the modulus-thermal-feedback mechanism to scalar quartics, with a credible qualitative result but a quantitative factor-of-two claim that leans on a region the authors themselves mark as not self-consistent. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.21523 v1 pith:G4XLCWFQ submitted 2025-07-29 hep-ph astro-ph.COhep-th

V. Knapp-Perez , Gopolang Mohlabeng , Michael Ratz , Tim M.P. Tait This is my paper

classification hep-phastro-ph.COhep-th

keywords non-equilibratedscalarsthermalfreeenergyfield-dependentcouplingscalarquarticdarkAbelianHiggsfirst-orderphasetransitionmodulicosmologygravitationalwaves

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Scalar fields that set the couplings of a theory are usually treated as either fully thermalized or completely decoupled. This paper studies the middle case: a weakly coupled modulus that stays out of equilibrium yet feels a thermal force because the masses and couplings of the plasma particles depend on its value. Since the free energy of the plasma favors smaller couplings at high temperature, the modulus is pushed toward smaller values, and any coupling it controls is correspondingly reduced. Applied to a dark Abelian Higgs model with quartic $\lambda(S) = (S/\Lambda)^2$, this makes the quartic at the symmetry-breaking transition smaller than its zero-temperature value, which strengthens the first-order phase transition relative to a static quartic. The paper also shows the effect is robust to initial conditions and can be summarized by a single dimensionless parameter.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the thermal free energy of the equilibrated plasma expressed in terms of modulus-controlled couplings, $F \simeq -\frac{\pi^2}{30} g_* T^4 + T^2\left[\sum_i c_i^{(g)} g_i^2(S) + \sum_f c_f^{(y)} y_f^2(S) + \sum_j c_j^{(m)} m_j^2(S) + \sum_\ell c_\ell^{(\lambda)} \lambda_\ell(S)\right]$. All of the coefficients $c$ are positive, so the free energy is lowered when couplings and masses decrease, and this creates a temperature-dependent effective potential for $S$. For the quartic application the decisive term is the two-loop contribution $V^{(S)}_{\mathrm{eff},T} = (S/\Lambda)^2 T^4/96$, which enters the modulus equation of motion $H^2 T^2 S''(T) + \partial V_{\mathrm{eff}}^{(S)}/\partial S = 0$. At high temperature this term overwhelms the zero-temperature quadratic potential $\tfrac{1}{2}m_S^2(S-S_0)^2$, pulling $S$ to smaller values and temporarily lowering the quartic; the competition between the thermal and zero-temperature terms is governed by $\sqrt{\lambda(S_0)}\, m_S \Lambda/\mu^2$.

What would settle it

A lattice computation of the free energy of a scalar field theory as a function of the quartic coupling would check the sign of the two-loop coefficient that produces the thermal term $(S/\Lambda)^2 T^4/96$; a negative sign would reverse the effect, while confirming the sign would support the claimed strengthening.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that, in a dark $U(1)'$ Abelian Higgs model with quartic $\lambda(S) = (S/\Lambda)^2$ fixed by a non-equilibrated modulus $S$, the thermal contribution to the modulus potential, $V^{(S)}_{\mathrm{eff},T} = (S/\Lambda)^2 T^4/96$, dominates at high temperature and drives $S$ toward zero. As the universe cools, the modulus returns to its zero-temperature minimum $S_0$, so the quartic grows back to $(S_0/\Lambda)^2$. Solving the modulus equation of motion in a radiation-dominated universe, the trajectory crosses the first-order phase-transition boundary at a smaller $\lambda$ than in the constant-quartic case, producing a stronger transition (Figure 3.1). The suppression factor $\lambda(S_{PT})/\lambda(S_0)$ depends on the combination $\sqrt{\lambda(S_0)}\, m_S \Lambda/\mu^2$; when this combination is below about 2, the quartic at the transition can be less than half of its zero-temperature value (Figure 3.2).

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes the dark Higgs and dark photon stay in thermal equilibrium with a common temperature throughout, and this assumption may fail in the gray region of Figure 3.2a where the strongest enhancement is found.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For the benchmark parameters, the quartic evaluated at the phase transition is smaller than its zero-temperature value by more than a factor of two, so the first-order transition is stronger than in the constant-quartic case.
The suppression factor is governed by the single dimensionless combination $\sqrt{\lambda(S_0)}\, m_S \Lambda/\mu^2$; once this combination exceeds about 2, the field-dependent effect becomes negligible.
Because the transition is stronger, the associated primordial gravitational-wave spectrum is enhanced, and out-of-equilibrium phenomena such as baryogenesis become more viable in this dark sector.
The effect does not rely on fine-tuned initial conditions: perturbing the initial value or velocity of $S$ changes the oscillations but leaves the smaller high-temperature quartics in place.
The same free-energy logic applies to gauge, Yukawa, and mass couplings, which are also driven to smaller values at high temperature; the quartic case is special because smaller $\lambda$ strengthens rather than weakens the transition.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The dimensionless control parameter $\sqrt{\lambda(S_0)}\, m_S \Lambda/\mu^2$ suggests the mechanism is generic: any modulus that sets a quartic should produce the same enhancement as long as the modulus is light enough and the cut-off is not too high, regardless of the gauge group.
The gray region of Figure 3.2a, where the strongest suppression would occur, is exactly where the equilibrium assumption for the dark Higgs may break down; treating that corner self-consistently could either enlarge or shrink the predicted enhancement.
Competing thermal baths, as in string constructions where one modulus increases one coupling while decreasing another, can reverse the sign of the force; probing the sign of $c^{(\lambda)}$ in such models would test whether the quartic effect is universal.
The single two-loop diagram behind $V^{(S)}_{\mathrm{eff},T}$ may not be the full story; a complete higher-order or lattice computation of the quartic free-energy coefficient would pin down the numerical size of the effect, since the qualitative direction depends only on the sign.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The thing to know: this is a genuinely new application of a known mechanism. Prior work in [5-8] showed that non-equilibrated moduli controlling gauge, mass, and Yukawa couplings get pushed to smaller couplings at finite temperature. This paper closes the last renormalizable case — the scalar quartic — in a dark Abelian Higgs model, and shows that the resulting lower λ at the transition strengthens the first-order phase transition. The qualitative mechanism is solid and the paper is honest about its caveats.

What it does well: the effective potential calculation in Appendix A is standard and transparent, the two-loop quartic term is properly sourced from Laine-Vuorinen, and the benchmark numerical solution (Fig 3.1) cleanly makes the point. The initial-condition insensitivity study (Fig 4.1) is a good check, and the gray-region exclusion in Fig 3.2a is frankly labeled. I agree with the reader that the novelty is contained — the framework isn't new — but the quartic application is a real missing piece.

The soft spot is the quantitative claim. The factor-of-two drop in λ(SPT)/λ(S0) sits right on the edge of the excluded gray region, where the initial λ(S_ini) already puts the dark Higgs in the broken phase. In that region, the Appendix A assumption of a light, common-temperature bath of h and A' breaks down, because the gauge boson becomes massive and the dark sector can decouple. The authors exclude the gray region, so they aren't overstating the calculation's scope, but the valid region's boundary is drawn with the same equilibrium potential, and the strongest enhancement contours hug that boundary. That makes the quantitative headline a derivative of the invalid region rather than a self-consistent calculation. A decoupling-aware treatment of the dark sector — or at least a valid-region-only benchmark showing the factor-of-two — is needed before the number can be quoted.

The missing λ-dependent two-loop diagrams in the modulus EOM are acknowledged in Appendix A; that's a minor quantitative uncertainty, not a flaw in the direction of the effect.

Bottom line: the qualitative claim holds, and the paper is a useful, readable contribution for anyone studying dark-sector phase transitions, gravitational waves, or moduli cosmology. The restriction to the valid region would weaken the quantitative punchline to roughly a 10-30% effect, but that still matters. It deserves a serious referee; the right referee will push for a decoupling-aware calculation or a re-scoped claim. Send it.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies a weakly coupled scalar modulus S whose vacuum expectation value controls the quartic coupling of a dark Abelian Higgs model through λ(S)=(S/Λ)^2. Because the thermal free energy of the equilibrated Higgs and gauge fields contains a positive term proportional to the quartic coupling, the modulus feels a thermal force that drives it to smaller field values at high temperature, thereby reducing the effective quartic. The authors solve the modulus equation of motion during radiation domination and show, for a benchmark set of parameters, that the quartic at the first-order phase transition is smaller than its zero-temperature value, implying a stronger transition than in a model with a static quartic. They map the enhancement as a function of the modulus mass and cutoff scale, provide a numerical fit, discuss initial-condition sensitivity, and comment on constraints and observational consequences such as gravitational waves and BBN.

Significance. The central qualitative mechanism is novel and well motivated: field-dependent couplings generated by out-of-equilibrium scalars can alter the thermal history of a dark sector and strengthen a first-order phase transition. If established quantitatively, the effect would have direct implications for gravitational-wave production and baryogenesis in dark sectors. The paper is transparent in several respects: it gives a concrete benchmark, checks sensitivity to initial conditions in Figure 4.1, explicitly excludes the region where its equilibrium assumption fails, and acknowledges that λ-dependent two-loop corrections are omitted. The qualitative direction of the effect is plausible and not called into question by the concerns below. However, the advertised quantitative result—a reduction of the quartic at the phase transition by more than a factor of two—is not yet supported in a fully self-consistent region of parameter space, because the strongest enhancement sits adjacent to the excluded gray region and because omitted λ-dependent terms are at the same order as the term retained.

major comments (2)

[Section 3, Eq. (3.5); Appendix A, Eqs. (A.8)-(A.10)] The modulus equation of motion uses only the two-loop quartic term V_2,h = λ T^4/96 as the thermal force on S. However, the full effective potential in Eq. (A.10) depends on λ through the tree-level term, the field-dependent scalar masses m_1^2 and m_2^2, and the thermal masses in Eq. (A.8a). In the high-temperature expansion of the J functions, the contribution from Π_h = λ T^2/2 + g^2 T^2/16 contains a λ-dependent piece of order λ T^4/24 for the two real scalar degrees of freedom, which is four times larger than the λ T^4/96 term retained in Eq. (3.5). The appendix acknowledges that λ-dependent diagrams can modify the equation of motion, but the J-function contribution is not a higher-loop effect beyond the order retained; it is a one-loop term at the same order in λ. The numerical ratio λ(S_PT)/λ(S_0) in Figures 3.2 is therefore not robust until these contributions are estimated or shown to be subdominant. At minimum, the paper should state that only the qualitative direction of the effect, and not the factor-of-two magnitude, is established.
[Section 3, Figure 3.2a and surrounding text] The quantitative claim that the quartic can decrease by more than a factor of two relies on the parameter region where the contours with ratio at or below 0.5 appear, which is the lower-left part of the m_S-Λ plane immediately adjacent to the gray excluded region. In that gray region the initial value of λ(S) places the universe in the broken phase, where the dark Higgs and dark photon may drop out of the common-temperature equilibrium assumed throughout Appendix A. Because the boundary of the gray region is itself drawn using the same equilibrium potential, the paper has not demonstrated that the factor-two enhancement occurs in a regime where the calculation is self-consistent. A decoupling-aware treatment of the dark sector, or at least a conservative estimate of where the equilibrium assumption fails, is needed before the factor-two result can be quoted as a quantitative finding.

minor comments (5)

[Figure 3.2a caption] The expression S_0 = 10^{-3.6}/2 × Λ is inconsistent with the stated value λ(S_0) = 10^{-3.6}; presumably S_0 = 10^{-3.6/2} × Λ is intended, and the notation should be corrected.
[Section 3, text after Eq. (3.7)] The sentence ending '...compared to the scenario with a constant quartic coupling.' contains a doubled period and should be cleaned up.
[Reference [8]] The author string 'T. Tait, M. P.' should be formatted as 'T. M. P. Tait'.
[Figure 3.2a, gray region] The criterion defining the gray region is not stated quantitatively; please give the precise condition (for example, whether the high-temperature minimum of Eq. (A.10) has nonzero v at T_ini).
[Section 2, Eq. (2.1)] A short derivation or a more explicit citation for the quartic coefficient c_λ would improve reproducibility, since this coefficient is the key input for the modulus thermal potential in Eq. (3.5).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central mechanism is a self-contained EOM application, with prior-work coefficients used as external inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that a non-equilibrated modulus S, with quartic coupling λ(S)=(S/Λ)^2, is driven to smaller values by the thermal free energy, reducing the quartic at the phase transition and strengthening the transition. This derivation is self-contained: the thermal potential for S, Eq. (3.5), follows from the externally quoted two-loop free-energy coefficient c_λ from Laine and Vuorinen [26], combined with the assumed field-dependence λ(S)=(S/Λ)^2. The equation of motion (3.6) is then solved numerically with stated initial conditions, and the ratio λ(S_PT)/λ(S_0) is read off from the crossing of the first-order transition boundary computed from Eq. (A.10). The fit (3.10) is a parameterization of the authors' own numerical results, not an input. The self-citations to [5,6,8] provide context and previously established coefficients for gauge and Yukawa couplings, but they are not load-bearing for the new quartic application, whose key coefficient is taken from an external textbook. The gray region in Figure 3.2a, where the initial quartic places the universe in the broken phase and the common-temperature assumption may fail, is explicitly flagged by the authors as not meaningful; this is a limitation on quantitative extrapolation, not a circular step. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work to force the conclusion. The claimed effect is a genuine dynamical consequence of the stated assumptions, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculation rests on standard thermal field theory inputs (the free energy expansion) and a simple benchmark model for the modulus and dark Higgs. No new particles or forces are introduced. The free parameters are benchmark choices and a purely numerical fit to the authors' own contours.

free parameters (7)

gauge coupling g = 0.3
Benchmark U(1)' gauge coupling used in Figures 3.1 and 3.2.
mass parameter μ = 1.3e11 GeV
Benchmark dark Higgs mass parameter.
cutoff scale Λ = 1e15 GeV
Scale suppressing the modulus-quartic interaction in λ(S) = (S/Λ)^2.
modulus mass m_S = 7.2e8 GeV
Benchmark mass of the modulus; controls the zero-temperature potential.
initial temperature T_ini = 3.16e12 GeV
Starting temperature for the modulus equation of motion.
zero-temperature modulus VEV S0 = 10^{-1.8} Λ
Fixed by requiring λ(S0)=10^{-3.6}; sets the late-time quartic.
fit parameters a, b, α = a=2.0, b=1.3, α=0.41
Best-fit parameters for the empirical ansatz (3.10) describing the ratio λ(SPT)/λ(S0).

assumptions (6)

domain assumption The leading-order free energy is F = -π^2/30 g_* T^4 + T^2 Σ c_i λ_i(S) with positive coefficients (Eq. 2.1).
Imported from thermal field theory (refs [22-27]); enters the modulus potential.
domain assumption The modulus S is not in thermal equilibrium, so the bath temperature T applies only to the plasma particles.
Central setup of the paper, stated in Section 2.
ad hoc to paper λ(S) = (S/Λ)^2 for the dark Higgs quartic, with Λ a cutoff above the relevant scales.
Phenomenological input; not derived from a UV theory.
ad hoc to paper The modulus potential is V_S = (1/2)m_S^2(S-S0)^2 and higher-order terms are negligible.
Chosen benchmark; higher-order terms are asserted to be small.
domain assumption The universe is radiation-dominated during the relevant epoch, so H ∝ T^2 and Tdot ≈ -H T (used in Eq. 3.8).
Standard cosmology assumption.
domain assumption The dark Higgs and dark photon are in thermal equilibrium (Appendix A).
Needed for the effective potential (A.10); breaks down in parts of parameter space (gray region).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Thermal History of Non-equilibrated Scalars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/G4XLCWFQ

@misc{pith2026250721523,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Thermal History of Non-equilibrated Scalars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/G4XLCWFQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.21523}
}

read the original abstract

Scalar fields in the early Universe are mostly discussed in two limits: either in equilibrium or completely decoupled. In this work we discuss scenarios where there are scalar fields that are not in equilibrium, but for which the coupling to thermal bath leads to interesting non-trivial dynamics. For example, in theories where scalar fields control the effective couplings of the theory, such out-of-equilibrium behavior can lead to cases where the couplings vary during cosmological evolution. We systematically examine the generic features governing the evolution of these couplings, and as an application we highlight a novel effect where the scalar quartic coupling of an Abelian Higgs model is modified, leading to stronger cosmological phase transitions than would be obtained for static non-evolving quartics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.21523 by the authors.

**Figure 3.1.** Phase diagram of an Abelian Higgs coupled to a U [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.2.** (a) Contours of the ratio 𝜆(𝑆PT)/𝜆(𝑆0) as a function of the mass 𝑚𝑆 and the scale Λ. Here, 𝜆(𝑆PT) is the quartic coupling evaluated at the point where the field crosses the first-order phase transition line while 𝜆(𝑆0) corresponds to its zero-temperature value. We fix 𝑔 = 0.3, 𝜇 = 1.3 × 1011 GeV and 𝑆0 = 10−3.6/2 × Λ , as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.1.** Sensitivity to initial conditions. The red, green and blue lines are the same as in Figure 3.1. The black and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

[1]

Cosmological problems for the Polonyi potential,

G. D. Coughlan, W. Fischler, E. W. Kolb, S. Raby, and G. G. Ross, “Cosmological problems for the Polonyi potential,” Phys. Lett. B131 (1983) 59

work page 1983
[2]

Model independent properties and cosmological implications of the dilaton and moduli sectors of 4-d strings,

B. de Carlos, J. A. Casas, F. Quevedo, and E. Roulet, “Model independent properties and cosmological implications of the dilaton and moduli sectors of 4-d strings,” Phys. Lett. B 318 (1993) 447–456, arXiv:hep-ph/9308325

arXiv 1993
[3]

Cosmological Moduli and the Post-Inflationary Universe: A Critical Review,

G. Kane, K. Sinha, and S. Watson, “Cosmological Moduli and the Post-Inflationary Universe: A Critical Review,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24 no. 08, (2015) 1530022, arXiv:1502.07746 [hep-th]

arXiv 2015
[4]

Supersymmetry breaking in the early universe,

M. Dine, L. Randall, and S. D. Thomas, “Supersymmetry breaking in the early universe,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 398–401, arXiv:hep-ph/9503303

arXiv 1995
[5]

Gauge couplings at high temperature and the relic gravitino abundance,

W. Buchm¨ uller, K. Hamaguchi, and M. Ratz, “Gauge couplings at high temperature and the relic gravitino abundance,” Phys. Lett. B574 (2003) 156–161, hep-ph/0307181. 10

arXiv 2003
[6]

Dilaton destabilization at high temperature,

W. Buchm¨ uller, K. Hamaguchi, O. Lebedev, and M. Ratz, “Dilaton destabilization at high temperature,” Nucl. Phys. B699 (2004) 292–308, hep-th/0404168

arXiv 2004
[7]

Dark energy from mass varying neutrinos,

R. Fardon, A. E. Nelson, and N. Weiner, “Dark energy from mass varying neutrinos,” JCAP 10 (2004) 005, arXiv:astro-ph/0309800

arXiv 2004
[8]

The Flavor of Cosmology,

B. Lillard, M. Ratz, T. Tait, M. P., and S. Trojanowski, “The Flavor of Cosmology,”JCAP 07 (2018) 056, arXiv:1804.03662 [hep-ph]

arXiv 2018

Show all 47 references

[9]

Time-varying fine structure constant from naturally ultralight dark matter,

D. Brzeminski, Z. Chacko, A. Dev, and A. Hook, “Time-varying fine structure constant from naturally ultralight dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 7, (2021) 075019, arXiv:2012.02787 [hep-ph]

2021 arXiv
[10]

Thermal misalignment of scalar dark matter,

B. Batell and A. Ghalsasi, “Thermal misalignment of scalar dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 9, (2023) L091701, arXiv:2109.04476 [hep-ph]

2023 arXiv
[11]

Resurrecting low-mass axion dark matter via a dynamical QCD scale,

L. Heurtier, F. Huang, and T. M. P. Tait, “Resurrecting low-mass axion dark matter via a dynamical QCD scale,” JHEP 12 (2021) 216, arXiv:2104.13390 [hep-ph]

2021 arXiv
[12]

Dark Matter Freeze Out during an Early Cosmological Period of QCD Confinement,

D. Berger, S. Ipek, T. M. P. Tait, and M. Waterbury, “Dark Matter Freeze Out during an Early Cosmological Period of QCD Confinement,” JHEP 07 (2020) 192, arXiv:2004.06727 [hep-ph]

2020 arXiv
[13]

Dark matter freeze-out during SU(2)𝐿 confinement,

J. N. Howard, S. Ipek, T. M. P. Tait, and J. Turner, “Dark matter freeze-out during SU(2)𝐿 confinement,” JHEP 02 (2022) 047, arXiv:2112.09152 [hep-ph]

2022 arXiv
[14]

Early Cosmological Period of QCD Confinement,

S. Ipek and T. M. P. Tait, “Early Cosmological Period of QCD Confinement,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 no. 11, (2019) 112001, arXiv:1811.00559 [hep-ph]

2019 arXiv
[15]

Electroweak Baryogenesis from Temperature-Varying Couplings,

S. A. R. Ellis, S. Ipek, and G. White, “Electroweak Baryogenesis from Temperature-Varying Couplings,” JHEP 08 (2019) 002, arXiv:1905.11994 [hep-ph]

2019 arXiv
[16]

QCD baryogenesis,

D. Croon, J. N. Howard, S. Ipek, and T. M. P. Tait, “QCD baryogenesis,”Phys. Rev. D 101 no. 5, (2020) 055042, arXiv:1911.01432 [hep-ph]

2020 arXiv
[17]

Leptogenesis enabled by dark matter,

D. Croon, H. Davoudiasl, and R. Houtz, “Leptogenesis enabled by dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 3, (2022) 035006, arXiv:2204.07584 [hep-ph]

2022 arXiv
[18]

Leptogenesis During an Era of Early SU(2) Confinement,

I. Bhalla-Ladd, I. Ginnett, and T. M. P. Tait, “Leptogenesis During an Era of Early SU(2) Confinement,” arXiv:2503.09723 [hep-ph]
[19]

Thermocoupled early dark energy,

M. Kamionkowski and A. Mathur, “Thermocoupled early dark energy,” Phys. Rev. D 111 no. 6, (2025) 063551, arXiv:2411.09747 [hep-ph]

2025 arXiv
[20]

Gravitational Waves from First-Order Phase Transitions Assisted by Temperature-Enhanced Scatterings,

A. Chaudhuri, “Gravitational Waves from First-Order Phase Transitions Assisted by Temperature-Enhanced Scatterings,” arXiv:2507.13135 [astro-ph.CO]
[21]

Effective Fermion Masses of Order gT in High Temperature Gauge Theories with Exact Chiral Invariance,

H. A. Weldon, “Effective Fermion Masses of Order gT in High Temperature Gauge Theories with Exact Chiral Invariance,” Phys. Rev. D 26 (1982) 2789

1982
[22]

The Three loop free energy for pure gauge QCD,

P. B. Arnold and C.-X. Zhai, “The Three loop free energy for pure gauge QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 7603–7623, arXiv:hep-ph/9408276

1994 arXiv
[23]

The Three loop free energy for high temperature QED and QCD with fermions,

P. B. Arnold and C.-x. Zhai, “The Three loop free energy for high temperature QED and QCD with fermions,” Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 1906–1918, arXiv:hep-ph/9410360

1995 arXiv
[24]

The Free energy of hot gauge theories with fermions through g**5,

C.-x. Zhai and B. M. Kastening, “The Free energy of hot gauge theories with fermions through g**5,” Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 7232–7246, arXiv:hep-ph/9507380

1995 arXiv
[25]

The Pressure of hot QCD up to g6 ln(1/g),

K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen, and Y. Schroder, “The Pressure of hot QCD up to g6 ln(1/g),” Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 105008, arXiv:hep-ph/0211321. 11

2003 arXiv
[26]

Laine and A

M. Laine and A. Vuorinen, Basics of Thermal Field Theory , vol. 925. Springer, 2016. arXiv:1701.01554 [hep-ph]

2016 arXiv
[27]

Thermal phase transition with full 2-loop effective potential,

M. Laine, M. Meyer, and G. Nardini, “Thermal phase transition with full 2-loop effective potential,” Nucl. Phys. B 920 (2017) 565–600, arXiv:1702.07479 [hep-ph]

2017 arXiv
[28]

Inverse symmetry breaking with 4-D lattice simulations,

K. Jansen and M. Laine, “Inverse symmetry breaking with 4-D lattice simulations,” Phys. Lett. B 435 (1998) 166–174, arXiv:hep-lat/9805024

1998 arXiv
[29]

Phase Structure of Scalar Compact QED,

K. Jansen, J. Jersak, C. B. Lang, T. Neuhaus, and G. Vones, “Phase Structure of Scalar Compact QED,” Nucl. Phys. B 265 (1986) 129–144

1986
[30]

Displaced vertex signals of low temperature baryogenesis,

P. Bittar and G. Burdman, “Displaced vertex signals of low temperature baryogenesis,” arXiv:2410.00957 [hep-ph]

arXiv
[31]

Spontaneous breaking of baryon number, baryogenesis and the bajoron,

P. Bittar, G. Burdman, and G. M. Salla, “Spontaneous breaking of baryon number, baryogenesis and the bajoron,” arXiv:2410.00964 [hep-ph]

arXiv
[32]

Theory of neutrinos: A White paper,

R. N. Mohapatra et al., “Theory of neutrinos: A White paper,” Rept. Prog. Phys. 70 (2007) 1757–1867, arXiv:hep-ph/0510213

2007 arXiv
[33]

Gravitational waves from the minimal gauged𝑈(1)𝐵−𝐿 model,

T. Hasegawa, N. Okada, and O. Seto, “Gravitational waves from the minimal gauged𝑈(1)𝐵−𝐿 model,” Phys. Rev. D 99 no. 9, (2019) 095039, arXiv:1904.03020 [hep-ph]

2019 arXiv
[34]

Low-energy remnants of superstring anomaly cancellation terms,

L. E. Ib ´a˜nez and H. P. Nilles, “Low-energy remnants of superstring anomaly cancellation terms,”Phys. Lett. B169 (1986) 354

1986
[35]

Moduli dependence of string loop corrections to gauge coupling constants,

L. J. Dixon, V. Kaplunovsky, and J. Louis, “Moduli dependence of string loop corrections to gauge coupling constants,” Nucl. Phys. B355 (1991) 649–688

1991
[36]

(0,2) heterotic gauge couplings and their M-theory origin,

S. Stieberger, “(0,2) heterotic gauge couplings and their M-theory origin,” Nucl. Phys. B541 (1999) 109–144, hep-th/9807124

1999 arXiv
[37]

Is the superstring weakly coupled?,

M. Dine and N. Seiberg, “Is the superstring weakly coupled?,” Phys. Lett. B162 (1985) 299

1985
[38]

Challenges for superstring cosmology,

R. Brustein and P. J. Steinhardt, “Challenges for superstring cosmology,” Phys. Lett. B302 (1993) 196–201, hep-th/9212049

1993 arXiv
[39]

Landscape, the scale of SUSY breaking, and inflation,

R. Kallosh and A. Linde, “Landscape, the scale of SUSY breaking, and inflation,” JHEP 12 (2004) 004, hep-th/0411011

2004 arXiv
[40]

Constraint on the reheating temperature from the decay of the Polonyi field,

M. Kawasaki, T. Moroi, and T. Yanagida, “Constraint on the reheating temperature from the decay of the Polonyi field,” Phys. Lett. B 370 (1996) 52–58, arXiv:hep-ph/9509399

1996 arXiv
[41]

Effects of cosmological moduli fields on cosmic microwave background,

T. Moroi and T. Takahashi, “Effects of cosmological moduli fields on cosmic microwave background,” Phys. Lett. B 522 (2001) 215–221, arXiv:hep-ph/0110096. [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 539, 303–303 (2002)]

2001 arXiv
[42]

Unified origin of baryons and dark matter,

R. Kitano, H. Murayama, and M. Ratz, “Unified origin of baryons and dark matter,” Phys. Lett. B 669 (2008) 145–149, arXiv:0807.4313 [hep-ph]

2008 arXiv
[43]

Baryogenesis, Dark Matter, and Flavor Structure in Non-thermal Moduli Cosmology,

M.-C. Chen and V. Takhistov, “Baryogenesis, Dark Matter, and Flavor Structure in Non-thermal Moduli Cosmology,” JHEP 05 (2019) 101, arXiv:1812.09341 [hep-ph]

2019 arXiv
[44]

Baryogenesis from a Modulus Dominated Universe,

G. Kane and M. W. Winkler, “Baryogenesis from a Modulus Dominated Universe,”JCAP 02 (2020) 019, arXiv:1909.04705 [hep-ph]

2020 arXiv
[45]

Dark matter and dark radiation from the early universe with a modulus coupled to the PQMSSM,

H. Baer, V. Barger, and R. Wiley Deal, “Dark matter and dark radiation from the early universe with a modulus coupled to the PQMSSM,” JHEP 06 (2023) 083, arXiv:2301.12546 [hep-ph] . 12

2023 arXiv
[46]

A Tale of Two Timescales: Mixing, Mass Generation, and Phase Transitions in the Early Universe,

K. R. Dienes, J. Kost, and B. Thomas, “A Tale of Two Timescales: Mixing, Mass Generation, and Phase Transitions in the Early Universe,”Phys. Rev. D 93 no. 4, (2016) 043540, arXiv:1509.00470 [hep-ph]

2016 arXiv
[47]

The Effective potential at finite temperature in the Standard Model,

M. E. Carrington, “The Effective potential at finite temperature in the Standard Model,” Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 2933–2944. 13

1992

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Cosmological problems for the Polonyi potential,

G. D. Coughlan, W. Fischler, E. W. Kolb, S. Raby, and G. G. Ross, “Cosmological problems for the Polonyi potential,” Phys. Lett. B131 (1983) 59

work page 1983

[2] [2]

Model independent properties and cosmological implications of the dilaton and moduli sectors of 4-d strings,

B. de Carlos, J. A. Casas, F. Quevedo, and E. Roulet, “Model independent properties and cosmological implications of the dilaton and moduli sectors of 4-d strings,” Phys. Lett. B 318 (1993) 447–456, arXiv:hep-ph/9308325

arXiv 1993

[3] [3]

Cosmological Moduli and the Post-Inflationary Universe: A Critical Review,

G. Kane, K. Sinha, and S. Watson, “Cosmological Moduli and the Post-Inflationary Universe: A Critical Review,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24 no. 08, (2015) 1530022, arXiv:1502.07746 [hep-th]

arXiv 2015

[4] [4]

Supersymmetry breaking in the early universe,

M. Dine, L. Randall, and S. D. Thomas, “Supersymmetry breaking in the early universe,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 398–401, arXiv:hep-ph/9503303

arXiv 1995

[5] [5]

Gauge couplings at high temperature and the relic gravitino abundance,

W. Buchm¨ uller, K. Hamaguchi, and M. Ratz, “Gauge couplings at high temperature and the relic gravitino abundance,” Phys. Lett. B574 (2003) 156–161, hep-ph/0307181. 10

arXiv 2003

[6] [6]

Dilaton destabilization at high temperature,

W. Buchm¨ uller, K. Hamaguchi, O. Lebedev, and M. Ratz, “Dilaton destabilization at high temperature,” Nucl. Phys. B699 (2004) 292–308, hep-th/0404168

arXiv 2004

[7] [7]

Dark energy from mass varying neutrinos,

R. Fardon, A. E. Nelson, and N. Weiner, “Dark energy from mass varying neutrinos,” JCAP 10 (2004) 005, arXiv:astro-ph/0309800

arXiv 2004

[8] [8]

The Flavor of Cosmology,

B. Lillard, M. Ratz, T. Tait, M. P., and S. Trojanowski, “The Flavor of Cosmology,”JCAP 07 (2018) 056, arXiv:1804.03662 [hep-ph]

arXiv 2018