Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 32 references

Observation of Superconducting Solitons by Terahertz-Light-Driven Persistent Pseudo-Spin Coherence

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports the observation of a driven soliton state in a superconducting thin film, signaled by a low-frequency terahertz sideband that grows nonlinearly with pump field and resonates with temperature.

desk verdict First experimental claim of a driven superconducting soliton; the sideband is real but the soliton identification is not yet closed. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.22383 v1 pith:24ATHUC4 submitted 2025-07-30 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-elquant-ph

M. Mootz , C. Vaswani , C. Huang , K. J. Lee , A. Khatri , P. Mandal , J. H. Kang , L. Luo
show 3 more authors
I. E. Perakis C. B. Eom J. Wang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.str-elquant-ph
keywords superconductingsolitonAndersonpseudo-spinterahertzpump-probeFloquetsidebandiron-basedsuperconductorBaFe2As2collectivecoherenceDickesuperradiance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the observation of a driven soliton state in a superconducting thin film, the first such state reported in a solid-state superconductor. Under intense, multi-cycle terahertz pulses, Co-doped BaFe2As2 develops a persistent, undamped oscillation of its superconducting order parameter and a new low-frequency spectral sideband at $\Delta\omega = 2\omega_0 - \omega_S$. The sideband grows nonlinearly with pump field and peaks when it resonates with the superconducting gap as temperature changes, which the authors interpret as synchronized Anderson pseudo-spin coherence analogous to Dicke superradiance. Quantum kinetic simulations on a multiband model reproduce the sideband and trace it to strong interband electron-hole coupling. If the interpretation holds, this would establish a light-based route to long-lived collective superconducting states at terahertz speeds.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Anderson pseudo-spin texture of the superconductor, which under strong driving acts as a single synchronized 'giant' pseudo-spin. The argument is carried by the soliton solution for the order parameter, $\Delta_S(t) = \Delta_+ \mathrm{dn}[\Delta_+(t - t_0),\, 1 - \Delta_-^2/\Delta_+^2]$, where $\mathrm{dn}$ is a Jacobi elliptic function describing undamped oscillations between $\Delta_-$ and $\Delta_+$. This solution and its frequency $\omega_S$ combine with the laser-driven $2\omega_0$ precession through difference-frequency mixing to produce the observable sideband at $\Delta\omega = 2\omega_0 - \omega_S$. The multiband model, with interband electron-hole coupling $U$ stronger than the intraband pairing interaction $V$, is the ingredient that permits synchronization, since setting $U = 0$ removes the sideband in simulation.

What would settle it

Measure the $\Delta\omega$ sideband's frequency while continuously tuning the pump frequency $\omega_0$ at fixed field and temperature: if the difference-frequency assignment is right, the sideband must shift as $\Delta\omega = 2\omega_0 - \omega_S$ with $\omega_S$ taken from the fitted order-parameter dynamics; if the peak instead stays at a fixed mode frequency or tracks absorbed pump energy, the soliton interpretation fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a multi-cycle terahertz pump with photon energy above the pair-breaking gap inverts the quasiparticle population of Anderson pseudo-spins and synchronizes them into a persistent precession, forming a superconducting soliton state whose order parameter oscillates without damping at a frequency $\omega_S$. During the pulse, this soliton coherence mixes with the laser-driven $2\omega_0$ pseudo-spin precession to generate a difference-frequency sideband at $\Delta\omega = 2\omega_0 - \omega_S$, which the experiment observes at 0.2-0.4 THz, well below the gap. The sideband exhibits strongly nonlinear field growth, a non-monotonic temperature dependence with a resonance as $\Delta\omega$ approaches $2\Delta$, and is absent for 0.5 THz pumping at low temperatures where $2\omega_0 < 2\Delta$. The authors fit the post-pulse order parameter to a Jacobi elliptic-function soliton solution with bounds $\Delta_+$ and $\Delta_-$, extract $\omega_S = 7.4$ meV, and reproduce the sideband in quantum kinetic simulations of a three-pocket model with strong interband interaction $U$. The absence of the sideband in a single-band Nb3Sn film under similar driving supports the conclusion that strong interband coupling is required for soliton formation.

Load-bearing premise

The claim stands or falls on whether the low-frequency spectral peak is difference-frequency mixing between a persistent order-parameter oscillation at $\omega_S$ and laser-driven pseudo-spin precession at $2\omega_0$, rather than heating, a bolometric probe response, coherent phonons, or an unrelated low-energy collective mode.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The low-frequency sideband at $\Delta\omega$ gives an experimental readout of synchronized pseudo-spin coherence that can be tracked in real time.
  • Because soliton formation requires pumping above the pair-breaking gap, the effect can be turned on or off by choosing the pump frequency relative to $2\Delta$.
  • The resonance of $\Delta\omega$ with $2\Delta$ provides a temperature control knob, since the gap shrinks as temperature rises toward $T_c$.
  • Single-band superconductors driven the same way should not show the sideband, which explains why such driven soliton states have been elusive in conventional superconductors.
  • The state forms during the multi-cycle pulse itself, so time-periodic driving can be used to create and hold the soliton rather than relying only on a sudden quench.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the difference-frequency picture is correct, a sum-frequency companion at $2\omega_0 + \omega_S$ should also exist; the paper does not report it, and a search there would test the mixing mechanism directly.
  • The assignment implies the sideband position should move as the pump frequency $\omega_0$ is tuned at fixed field, so mapping $\Delta\omega$ versus $\omega_0$ would measure how the soliton frequency depends on driving conditions.
  • The Dicke-superradiance analogy suggests a coherent emission burst at $\omega_S$ after the pump leaves the film; time-resolved terahertz emission could look for that collective radiation.
  • The paper claims minimal decay after the pulse, so longer pump-probe delays could quantify the soliton lifetime and test whether the state truly resists decoherence, as the quantum-memory motivation requires.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports THz pump–THz probe measurements on optimally Co-doped BaFe2As2 thin films. Under intense multi-cycle 1 THz (and 0.5 THz) pumping, the differential transmission exhibits coherent oscillations whose Fourier spectra contain, in addition to the driving frequency ω0 and its second harmonic 2ω0, a low-frequency sideband Δω ≈ 0.2–0.4 THz. This sideband grows nonlinearly with pump field and shows a non-monotonic temperature dependence. The authors interpret Δω as 2ω0 − ωS, where ωS is the frequency of a persistent, undamped oscillation of the superconducting order parameter (a 'soliton' state) predicted by their quantum kinetic simulations of a three-pocket multiband model with strong interband coupling. Simulations reproduce the sideband and its temperature dependence, and a comparison with Nb3Sn is used to argue that strong interband coupling is required.

Significance. If substantiated, the claim would be the first observation of a dynamical soliton state in a superconductor, with potential impact on THz coherent control and quantum information. The manuscript's strengths include direct simulation of the measured differential transmission, a concurrent reference measurement of the static probe transmission, and a comparison of multiband and single-band systems that yields a qualitative control. However, the experimental evidence lacks a direct demonstration of persistence after the pump, and the theoretical interpretation is built on a model with parameters taken from prior work; the observed temperature and field dependences, while consistent with the proposed picture, are not uniquely diagnostic.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III, Fig. 1(f) and Fig. 3(b)] The central claim of a persistent soliton state is not directly supported by the experimental data. No pump–probe trace is shown that extends well beyond the multi-cycle pump pulse, and no decay time or maximum delay is reported for the measured ΔE(Δt_pp) oscillation. Persistence is demonstrated only for the simulated hole-band order parameter Δ_h(t) in the inset of Fig. 3(b). If the experimentally observed Δω sideband decays on a timescale comparable to or shorter than the pump duration, the identification with a persistent soliton is unjustified. Please show long-delay data, or explicitly characterize the decay time and state why persistence is not required for the conclusions.
  2. [Section III, paragraph after Fig. 2] The arguments ruling out a low-energy collective mode do not exclude a bolometric/thermal response or spectral leakage. In particular, the suppression of Δω under 0.5 THz excitation below 10 K coincides with the regime 2ω0 < 2Δ_SC, where pump absorption is minimal; this does not separate soliton formation from a generic absorbed-power threshold. The zero-frequency background 'overshoot' also shows that slowly varying spectral weight is present. Please provide quantitative control experiments (e.g., pump-polarization dependence, a non-superconducting reference sample, or an absorbed-energy scaling analysis) to exclude these alternatives.
  3. [Section III, Figs. 2(c,d) and Appendix C] The normalized intensity ratios are shown without error bars, and the subtraction of the slowly varying amplitude is described only qualitatively. Because the zero-frequency background is substantial and the subtraction is applied only to the temperature-dependent dataset, the non-monotonic behavior of the Δω peak could be an artifact of the background-removal procedure. Please report the number of repeated scans, the resulting uncertainties, and the raw spectra before and after subtraction.
  4. [Section III, Fig. 3 and simulation description] The theoretical identification of the Δω sideband with a soliton mode relies on quantum kinetic simulations whose parameters (Δe, Δh, U, V, pump field strengths) are chosen from the authors' previous work and adjusted to reproduce the sideband. This creates a circularity risk for the interpretation. Please show how the Δω sideband depends on the choice of these parameters, and state whether it appears for a plausible range of parameters without fine-tuning, or provide a parameter-free analytic estimate of Δω = 2ω0 − ωS.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Conclusion] Phrases such as 'THz-speed quantum gate operations' and 'long-lived quantum memory' are speculative and not demonstrated; they should be moved to an outlook statement.
  2. [Section III, third paragraph] The phrase 'the soliton sideband Δω0' appears to be a typo for 'Δω'.
  3. [Throughout] The manuscript refers repeatedly to appendices (Sec. 1–3, Appendix B; Appendix A; Appendix C) that are not included in the submitted text. The experimental and simulation details in these appendices are essential for reproducibility and should be part of the manuscript or clearly available.
  4. [Figure 1(e)] The vertical dashed line marks the gate time t_gate = 0.18 ps, but the axis is labeled t_gate; the reader has to infer that Δt_pp = 3 ps for the shown trace. Please spell out the fixed delays in the caption.
  5. [Figure 3(b), inset] The fit of the post-pulse dynamics to a Jacobi elliptic function is stated to yield 2Δ+ = 6.2 meV and 2Δ− = 5.8 meV, but the soliton frequency ωS = 7.4 meV exceeds 2Δ+; a sentence explaining this relation would help.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation chain: the sideband is independent measured data, and the simulation is a forward model rather than a fit of the claimed quantity.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The central observation—the low-frequency Δω sideband in the differential THz transmission ΔE(Δt_pp)—is raw measured spectral content, not a quantity constructed from the soliton model. The interpretation that this sideband equals 2ω0 − ωS is supported by a quantum kinetic simulation of the same observable, with model parameters taken from earlier same-group work [17,18,31,32]; that is ordinary model transfer, not a self-citation that supplies the conclusion. The soliton identification is made by fitting the simulated post-pulse order parameter Δ_h(t) to the known Yuzbashyan soliton solution, and the resulting ωS is then used in the consistency relation Δω = 2ω0 − ωS. The experimental peak is not an input to that fit, and no equation reduces by construction to its own input. The absence of a long-delay experimental persistence trace, the plausibility of thermal/bolometric or spectral-leakage alternatives, and the lack of reported error bars on temperature-dependent ratios are evidentiary and correctness concerns, not circularity. Under the hard rules, no specific reduction can be exhibited, so the honest finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a multiband BCS-like model with several chosen interaction parameters and on the identification of the measured sideband with a theoretical soliton mode. No new particles or forces are introduced. The model parameters and the soliton ansatz are taken from prior theoretical work and the same group's earlier studies.

free parameters (4)
  • Order parameters Delta_e, Delta_h in three-pocket model = 2Delta_+ = 6.2 meV, 2Delta_- = 5.8 meV (soliton fit); model gaps chosen similar to Refs. [17,18]
    The simulation sets gap magnitudes based on prior experimental characterizations, not from the present sideband data.
  • Interband interaction U and intraband interaction V = U > V, values not given in main text
    Strong interband coupling is assumed to be the key ingredient for soliton formation; the ratio U/V is chosen, not measured here.
  • Pump field strengths in simulations = E0 = 10, 18, 22 kV/cm; different values for U=0 case
    Simulation pump amplitudes are chosen to produce comparable quench amplitudes; not fit to the sideband spectrum.
  • Soliton fit parameters Delta_+, Delta_-, t0 = 2Delta_+ = 6.2 meV, 2Delta_- = 5.8 meV
    Extracted by fitting the simulated order parameter to a Jacobi elliptic function, not from experimental data.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption BCS-like mean-field pseudo-spin Hamiltonian with Coulomb-coupled electron-hole bands (Appendix A) describes the driven superconductor.
    The entire simulation and interpretation rest on this Hamiltonian; it is standard for multiband superconductors but neglects fluctuations beyond mean field.
  • domain assumption Strong interband electron-hole interaction U exceeds intraband pairing V in Ba(Fe,Co)2As2.
    Invoked to explain why solitons appear in FeSC but not in one-band Nb3Sn; supported by prior work of the same group (Refs. 17,18).
  • standard math The time-dependent order parameter after the pulse is described by the soliton ansatz Delta_S(t) = Delta_+ dn[Delta_+(t-t0), 1-Delta_-^2/Delta_+^2] (Ref. [20]).
    This exact solution of the BCS gap equation in the collisionless limit is used to identify the simulated oscillations as soliton dynamics.
  • domain assumption The system evolves coherently without significant quasiparticle scattering or heating during the multi-cycle pulse.
    Undamped persistent oscillations require negligible dephasing; the paper does not quantify scattering rates in the film.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Observation of Superconducting Solitons by Terahertz-Light-Driven Persistent Pseudo-Spin Coherence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/24ATHUC4

@misc{pith2026250722383,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Observation of Superconducting Solitons by Terahertz-Light-Driven Persistent Pseudo-Spin Coherence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/24ATHUC4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.22383}
}
abstract

Overcoming the decoherence bottleneck remains a central challenge for advancing coherent superconducting quantum device and information technologies. Solitons -- non-dispersive wave packets stabilized by the collective synchronization of quantum excitations -- offer a robust pathway to mitigating dephasing, yet their realization in superconductors has remained experimentally elusive. Here, we report the observation of a driven soliton state in epitaxial thin films of an iron-based superconductor (Co-doped BaFe$_2$As$_2$), induced by intense, multi-cycle terahertz (THz) periodic driving. The dynamical transition to this soliton state is marked by the emergence of Floquet-like spectral sidebands that exhibit a strongly nonlinear dependence on THz laser field strength and a resonant enhancement with temperature. Quantum kinetic simulations corroborate these observations, allowing us to underpin the emergence of synchronized Anderson pseudo-spin oscillations -- analogous to Dicke superradiance -- mediated by persistent order parameter oscillations. In this coherently driven state, the observed sidebands result from difference-frequency mixing between the THz drive and persistent soliton dynamics. These findings establish a robust framework for coherently driving and controlling superconducting soliton time-crystal-like phases using low dissipation, time-periodic THz fields, enabling prospects for THz-speed quantum gate operations, long-lived quantum memory, and robust quantum sensing based on enhanced macroscopic pseudo-spin coherence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.22383 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Experimental observation of THz-driven pseudo-spin soliton dynamics in a multiband superconductor. (a) Schematic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Temperature-dependent signatures of pseudo-spin soliton dynamics in Ba(Fe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Simulated coherent nonlinear transmission spectra reveal soliton signatures in a multiband superconductor. (a) Time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Comparison between multi-band and one-band superconductors under multi-cycle THz driving reveals the role of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Blumberg, A

    G. Blumberg, A. Mialitsin, B. S. Dennis, M. V . Klein, N. D. Zhigadlo, and J. Karpinski, Observation of Leggett’s collective mode in a multiband MgB2 superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 227002 (2007)

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    Fausti, R

    D. Fausti, R. I. Tobey, N. Dean, S. Kaiser, A. Dienst, M. C. Hoffmann, S. Pyon, T. Takayama, H. Takagi, and A. Cavalleri, Light-induced superconductivity in a stripe-ordered cuprate, Science331, 189 (2011)

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Matsunaga, Y

    R. Matsunaga, Y . I. Hamada, K. Makise, Y . Uzawa, H. Terai, Z. Wang, and R. Shimano, Higgs amplitude mode in the BCS superconductorsNb 1−xTixNinduced by terahertz pulse excitation, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 057002 (2013)

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    Matsunaga, N

    R. Matsunaga, N. Tsuji, H. Fujita, A. Sugioka, K. Makise, Y . Uzawa, H. Terai, Z. Wang, H. Aoki, and R. Shimano, Light- induced collective pseudospin precession resonating with Higgs mode in a superconductor, Science345, 1145 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Rajasekaran, E

    S. Rajasekaran, E. Casandruc, Y . Laplace, D. Nicoletti, G. D. Gu, S. R. Clark, D. Jaksch, and A. Cavalleri, Parametric amplification of a superconducting plasma wave, Nat. Phys.12, 1012 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Mitrano, A

    M. Mitrano, A. Cantaluppi, D. Nicoletti, S. Kaiser, A. Perucchi, S. Lupi, P. Di Pietro, D. Pontiroli, M. Ricc `o, S. R. Clark, D. Jaksch, and A. Cavalleri, Possible light-induced superconductivity in K 3C60 at high temperature, Nature530, 461 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Matsunaga, N

    R. Matsunaga, N. Tsuji, K. Makise, H. Terai, H. Aoki, and R. Shimano, Polarization-resolved terahertz third-harmonic generation in a single-crystal superconductor NbN: Dominance of the Higgs mode beyond the BCS approximation, Phys. Rev. B96, 020505 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    X. Yang, L. Luo, M. Mootz, A. Patz, S. L. Bud’ko, P. C. Canfield, I. E. Perakis, and J. Wang, Nonequilibrium pair breaking inBa(Fe 1−xCox)2As2 superconductors: Evidence for formation of a photoinduced excitonic state, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 267001 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 32 references
  1. [9]

    X. Yang, C. Vaswani, C. Sundahl, M. Mootz, P. Gagel, L. Luo, J. Kang, P. Orth, I. Perakis, C. Eom, and J. Wang, Terahertz-light quantum tuning of a metastable emergent phase hidden by superconductivity, Nat. Mater.17, 586 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    X. Yang, C. Vaswani, C. Sundahl, M. Mootz, L. Luo, J. Kang, I. Perakis, C. Eom, and J. Wang, Lightwave-driven gapless superconductivity and forbidden quantum beats by terahertz symmetry breaking, Nat. Photonics13, 707 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    Giorgianni, T

    F. Giorgianni, T. Cea, C. Vicario, C. P. Hauri, W. K. Withanage, X. Xi, and L. Benfatto, Leggett mode controlled by light pulses, Nat. Phys.15, 341 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Vaswani, M

    C. Vaswani, M. Mootz, C. Sundahl, D. H. Mudiyanselage, J. H. Kang, X. Yang, D. Cheng, C. Huang, R. H. J. Kim, Z. Liu, L. Luo, I. E. Perakis, C. B. Eom, and J. Wang, Terahertz second-harmonic generation from lightwave acceleration of symmetry-breaking nonlinear supercurrents, P...

    2020

  5. [13]

    H. Chu, M. J. Kim, K. Katsumi, S. Kovalev, R. D. Dawson, L. Schwarz, N. Yoshikawa, G. Kim, D. Putzky, Z. Z. Li, H. Raffy, S. Germanskiy, J. C. Deinert, N. Awari, I. Ilyakov, B. Green, M. Chen, M. Bawatna, G. Cristiani, G. Logvenov, Y . Gallais, A. V . Boris, B. Keimer, A. P. S...

    2020

  6. [14]

    Budden, T

    M. Budden, T. Gebert, M. Buzzi, G. Jotzu, E. Wang, T. Matsuyama, G. Meier, Y . Laplace, D. Pontiroli, M. Ricc `o, F. Schlawin, D. Jaksch, and A. Cavalleri, Evidence for metastable photo-induced superconductivity in K3C60, Nat. Phys. 17, 611 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Isoyama, N

    K. Isoyama, N. Yoshikawa, K. Katsumi, J. Wong, N. Shikama, Y . Sakishita, F. Nabeshima, A. Maeda, and R. Shi- mano, Light-induced enhancement of superconductivity in iron-based superconductor FeSe 0.5Te0.5, Commun. Phys.4, 160 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Buzzi, G

    M. Buzzi, G. Jotzu, A. Cavalleri, J. I. Cirac, E. A. Demler, B. I. Halperin, M. D. Lukin, T. Shi, Y . Wang, and D. Podolsky, Higgs-mediated optical amplification in a nonequilibrium superconductor, Phys. Rev. X11, 011055 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Vaswani, J

    C. Vaswani, J. H. Kang, M. Mootz, L. Luo, X. Yang, C. Sundahl, D. Cheng, C. Huang, R. H. J. Kim, Z. Liu, Y . G. Collantes, E. E. Hellstrom, I. E. Perakis, C. B. Eom, and J. Wang, Light quantum control of persisting Higgs modes in iron-based superconductors, Nat. Commun.12, 258 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    L. Luo, M. Mootz, J. H. Kang, C. Huang, K. Eom, J. W. Lee, C. Vaswani, Y . G. Collantes, E. E. Hellstrom, I. E. Perakis, C. B. Eom, and J. Wang, Quantum coherence tomography of light-controlled superconductivity, Nat. Phys.19, 201 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    J. Yuan, L. Shi, L. Yue, B. Li, Z. Wang, S. Xu, T. Xu, Y . Wang, Z. Gan, F. Chen, Z. Lin, X. Wang, K. Jin, X. Wang, J. Luo, S. Zhang, Q. Wu, Q. Liu, T. Hu, R. Li, X. Zhou, D. Wu, T. Dong, and N. Wang, Dynamical interplay between superconductivity and pseudogap in cuprates as r...

    2024

  12. [20]

    E. A. Yuzbashyan, Normal and anomalous solitons in the theory of dynamical Cooper pairing, Phys. Rev. B78, 184507 (2008)

    2008

  13. [21]

    E. A. Yuzbashyan and M. Dzero, Dynamical vanishing of the order parameter in a fermionic condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 230404 (2006)

    2006

  14. [22]

    D. J. Young, A. Chu, E. Y . Song, D. Barberena, D. Wellnitz, Z. Niu, V . M. Sch¨afer, R. J. Lewis-Swan, A. M. Rey, and J. K. Thompson, Observing dynamical phases of BCS superconductors in a cavity QED simulator, Nature625, 679 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    C. J. Yang, J. Li, M. Fiebig, and S. Pal, Terahertz control of many-body dynamics in quantum materials, Nat. Rev. Mater. 8, 518 (2023)

    2023

  16. [24]

    Huang, M

    C. Huang, M. Mootz, L. Luo, D. Cheng, A. Khatri, J. M. Park, R. H. J. Kim, Y . Qiang, V . L. Quito, Y . Yao, P. P. Orth, I. E. Perakis, and J. Wang, Discovery of an unconventional quantum echo by interference of Higgs coherence, Sci. Adv. 11, eads8740 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    Murotani, N

    Y . Murotani, N. Tsuji, and H. Aoki, Theory of light-induced resonances with collective Higgs and Leggett modes in multiband superconductors, Phys. Rev. B95, 104503 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    Y . Z. Chou, Y . Liao, and M. S. Foster, Twisting anderson pseudospins with light: Quench dynamics in terahertz-pumped BCS superconductors, Phys. Rev. B95, 104507 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    H. P. O. Collado, J. Lorenzana, G. Usaj, and C. A. Balseiro, Population inversion and dynamical phase transitions in a driven superconductor, Phys. Rev. B98, 214519 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    R. H. Dicke, Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes, Phys. Rev.93, 99 (1954)

    1954

  21. [29]

    E. A. Yuzbashyan, V . B. Kuznetsov, and B. L. Altshuler, Integrable dynamics of coupled Fermi-Bose condensates, Phys. Rev. B72, 144524 (2005)

    2005

  22. [30]

    E. A. Yuzbashyan, M. Dzero, V . Gurarie, and M. S. Foster, Quantum quench phase diagrams of ans-wave BCS-BEC condensate, Phys. Rev. A91, 033628 (2015)

    2015

  23. [31]

    Mootz, L

    M. Mootz, L. Luo, J. Wang, and I. E. Perakis, Visualization and quantum control of light-accelerated condensates by terahertz multi-dimensional coherent spectroscopy, Commun. Phys.5, 47 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Mootz, L

    M. Mootz, L. Luo, C. Huang, J. Wang, and I. E. Perakis, Multidimensional coherent spectroscopy of light-driven states and their collective modes in multiband superconductors, Phys. Rev. B109, 014515 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.