pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.00761 · v2 · submitted 2025-08-01 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions at a Muon Collider Neutrino Detector

Felix Kling , Yang Ma , Krzysztof M\k{e}ka{\l}a , J\"urgen Reuter , Zahra Tabrizi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 01:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords non-standard neutrino interactionsmuon colliderforward neutrino detectorneutrino fluxbeyond standard modelhigh energy neutrinosFASERmuC
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

A forward neutrino detector at a muon collider can exceed current bounds on non-standard neutrino interactions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that future multi-TeV muon colliders will act as the most intense sources of high-energy neutrinos through the decays of their beam muons. Placing a dedicated forward detector in the straight sections of the collider ring allows measurements of neutrino-initiated reactions that can set tighter limits on non-standard interactions than those from low-energy precision experiments or the LHC. The advantage stems from the large neutrino flux combined with exact knowledge of which neutrino flavors are present on each side of the interaction point and their chirality. A sympathetic reader would care because this turns an existing collider design into a new tool for testing physics beyond the standard model without requiring separate experiments.

Core claim

Future multi-TeV muon colliders produce intense beams of high-energy neutrinos from muon decays. A dedicated forward neutrino detector measures reactions from these neutrinos and can probe non-standard neutrino interactions more sensitively than existing or planned experiments, owing to the high flux, known flavor composition on each side of the interaction point, and known neutrino chirality.

What carries the argument

The proposed FASERmuC forward neutrino detector placed in the straight sections of the muon collider ring, which records interactions from neutrinos produced by decaying beam muons.

If this is right

  • Non-standard neutrino interaction searches at the muon collider can surpass current limits from precision measurements and the LHC.
  • The large flux of high-energy neutrinos provides the statistical power needed for improved constraints.
  • Exact knowledge of neutrino flavor and chirality on each side of the interaction point enables cleaner signal extraction.
  • Technical requirements for the forward detector must be met to realize the full sensitivity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This setup could be combined with direct muon collider searches for new physics to cross-check results on the same interaction models.
  • Similar forward detectors might be considered for other high-energy lepton colliders to expand neutrino-based tests of beyond-standard-model effects.
  • The approach could motivate studies of how non-standard interactions affect neutrino propagation over the collider's baseline distances.

Load-bearing premise

The precise knowledge of neutrino flavor composition on each side of the interaction point and the chirality of the neutrinos can be maintained in practice with the detector's performance.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that the detector's sensitivity to non-standard interactions does not surpass the projected bounds from low-energy experiments or the LHC, or that flavor and chirality identification cannot be achieved at the required precision.

read the original abstract

In addition to their broad physics reach enabled by their high energies and precision, future multi-TeV muon colliders will also be the world's most intense sources of neutrinos. This offers the opportunity to search for new non-standard neutrino interactions, possible by installing a dedicated forward neutrino detector in the straight sections of the collision ring, which is then used to measure reactions initiated by neutrinos from the decaying beam muons. In this paper, we show that these searches can exceed current and upcoming bounds on non-standard neutrino interactions from low-energy precision experiments and the LHC. This is achieved by the large flux of high-energetic neutrinos, the precise knowledge of the neutrino flavor composition on each side of the interaction point and the chirality of the neutrinos. We further discuss the technical requirements of the proposed forward neutrino detector, \FASERmuC, to maximally exploit this physics potential.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes using neutrinos produced from muon decays at a future multi-TeV muon collider, detected by a dedicated forward detector called FASERmuC, to search for non-standard neutrino interactions (NSI). It claims that the high neutrino flux, combined with precise knowledge of flavor composition and chirality on each side of the interaction point, enables sensitivities that exceed current and upcoming bounds from low-energy precision experiments and the LHC. The manuscript also outlines technical requirements for the detector to realize this potential.

Significance. If the projected sensitivities can be achieved under realistic conditions, the work would establish a new avenue for NSI searches that exploits the unique high-intensity, flavor-tagged neutrino source provided by a muon collider. This multi-purpose aspect of muon colliders is a strength of the proposal and could meaningfully tighten constraints on NSI parameters beyond what is possible at existing facilities.

major comments (1)
  1. [§4] §4 and associated sensitivity plots: the projections rely on efficiency factors and zero-background approximations without a full GEANT4-level simulation or systematic uncertainty budget. This is load-bearing for the central claim, because if realistic tagging efficiencies fall below ~80% or irreducible backgrounds (e.g., beam halo) exceed the assumed level, the projected improvement over LHC and low-energy bounds disappears.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and introduction would benefit from explicitly naming the NSI operators or parameters (e.g., ε_{αβ}) that are being constrained in the projections.
  2. Figure captions for the sensitivity plots should state the assumed luminosities, efficiencies, and background levels used to generate the curves.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive overall assessment of our proposal and for the constructive major comment on the sensitivity projections. We have revised the manuscript to directly address the concern about the assumptions underlying the projected reach in Section 4.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 and associated sensitivity plots: the projections rely on efficiency factors and zero-background approximations without a full GEANT4-level simulation or systematic uncertainty budget. This is load-bearing for the central claim, because if realistic tagging efficiencies fall below ~80% or irreducible backgrounds (e.g., beam halo) exceed the assumed level, the projected improvement over LHC and low-energy bounds disappears.

    Authors: We agree that the sensitivity projections in Section 4 rest on assumed tagging efficiencies and a zero-background hypothesis, and that a full GEANT4 simulation together with a complete systematic budget would be required for a definitive experimental proposal. As the present work is a conceptual study introducing the FASERmuC detector concept, such a detailed simulation lies outside its scope. Nevertheless, the efficiencies we adopt (typically 80–90 % for the key muon and electron tagging requirements) are chosen conservatively on the basis of existing FASER performance and the expected detector technologies. To strengthen the manuscript, we have added a new paragraph and an accompanying figure in Section 4 that explicitly shows how the projected NSI bounds scale with tagging efficiency and with the presence of a small irreducible background. These studies demonstrate that even if the efficiency drops to 70 % or a background level corresponding to a few events per year is included, the muon-collider neutrino detector still improves upon current and near-term LHC and low-energy bounds in several NSI parameter directions. We have also inserted a brief discussion of the dominant systematic uncertainties (flux normalization, beam-halo modeling, and detector response) and how they would be controlled in a realistic implementation. We believe these additions make the central claim more robust while remaining honest about the preliminary nature of the projections. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: sensitivity projections rely on external flux calculations and assumed detector parameters

full rationale

The paper calculates projected NSI limits from high-energy neutrinos produced in muon decays at a future collider, using the known beam composition, chirality, and a proposed FASERmuC detector geometry. Event rates and exclusion contours are derived from standard cross-section formulas and efficiency assumptions, then compared directly to published bounds from low-energy experiments and the LHC. No equation or result is defined in terms of itself, no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported via self-citation to force the central claim. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks and does not reduce to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on unverified assumptions about future muon collider operation, neutrino flux, and detector capabilities that are taken as given rather than derived or measured in this work.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Future multi-TeV muon colliders will deliver the stated high neutrino flux with well-known flavor composition and chirality from muon decays.
    The sensitivity projection depends on this background assumption about collider performance.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5695 in / 1258 out tokens · 33560 ms · 2026-05-19T01:28:29.333560+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 88 canonical work pages · 16 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Buchmuller and D

    W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler,Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New Interactions and Flavor Conservation, Nucl. Phys. B268 (1986) 621–653

    work page 1986

  2. [2]

    Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian

    B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak, and J. Rosiek,Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP 1010 (2010) 085, [arXiv:1008.4884]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  3. [3]

    E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, and P. Stoffer,Low-Energy Effective Field Theory below the Electroweak Scale: Operators and Matching, JHEP 03 (2018) 016, [arXiv:1709.04486]. [Erratum: JHEP 12, 043 (2023)]

    work page arXiv 2018

  4. [4]

    CERN Council, Geneva, 2020

    European Strategy Group Collaboration, 2020 Update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics. CERN Council, Geneva, 2020

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Asai et al.,Exploring the Quantum Universe: Pathways to Innovation and Discovery in Particle Physics, arXiv:2407.19176

    P5 Collaboration, S. Asai et al.,Exploring the Quantum Universe: Pathways to Innovation and Discovery in Particle Physics, arXiv:2407.19176

    work page arXiv

  6. [6]

    The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 6, 2025

    National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine Collaboration, Elementary Particle Physics:The Higgs and Beyond. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 6, 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Abada et al.,FCC-hh: The Hadron Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 3, Eur

    FCC Collaboration, A. Abada et al.,FCC-hh: The Hadron Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 3, Eur. Phys. J. ST 228 (2019), no. 4 755–1107

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Benedikt et al.,Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report: Volume 2, Accelerators, Technical Infrastructure and Safety, arXiv:2505.00274

    FCC Collaboration, M. Benedikt et al.,Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report: Volume 2, Accelerators, Technical Infrastructure and Safety, arXiv:2505.00274

    work page arXiv

  9. [9]

    Attié et al.,A Linear Collider Vision for the Future of Particle Physics, arXiv:2503.19983

    Linear Collider Vision Collaboration, D. Attié et al.,A Linear Collider Vision for the Future of Particle Physics, arXiv:2503.19983

    work page arXiv

  10. [10]

    Gessner et al.,Design Initiative for a 10 TeV pCM Wakefield Collider, arXiv:2503.20214

    S. Gessner et al.,Design Initiative for a 10 TeV pCM Wakefield Collider, arXiv:2503.20214

    work page arXiv

  11. [11]

    Accettura et al.,Towards a muon collider, Eur

    C. Accettura et al.,Towards a muon collider, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023), no. 9 864, [arXiv:2303.08533]. [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 84, 36 (2024)]

    work page arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    Accettura et al.,The Muon Collider, arXiv:2504.21417

    International Muon Collider Collaboration, C. Accettura et al.,The Muon Collider, arXiv:2504.21417. – 18 –

    work page arXiv

  13. [13]

    Foldenauer, F

    P. Foldenauer, F. Kling, and P. Reimitz,Potential of CMS as a high-energy neutrino scattering experiment, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 11 113005, [arXiv:2108.05370]

    work page arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    J. L. Feng, I. Galon, F. Kling, and S. Trojanowski,ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018), no. 3 035001, [arXiv:1708.09389]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  15. [15]

    Letter of Intent for FASER: ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the LHC

    F ASERCollaboration, A. Ariga et al.,Letter of Intent for FASER: ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the LHC, arXiv:1811.10243

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    Technical Proposal for FASER: ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the LHC

    F ASERCollaboration, A. Ariga et al.,Technical Proposal for FASER: ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the LHC, arXiv:1812.09139

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    FASER's Physics Reach for Long-Lived Particles

    F ASERCollaboration, A. Ariga et al.,FASER’s physics reach for long-lived particles, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019), no. 9 095011, [arXiv:1811.12522]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  18. [18]

    Abreu et al.,Detecting and Studying High-Energy Collider Neutrinos with FASER at the LHC, Eur

    F ASERCollaboration, H. Abreu et al.,Detecting and Studying High-Energy Collider Neutrinos with FASER at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020), no. 1 61, [arXiv:1908.02310]

    work page arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    Abreu et al.,Technical Proposal: FASERnu, arXiv:2001.03073

    F ASERCollaboration, H. Abreu et al.,Technical Proposal: FASERnu, arXiv:2001.03073

    work page arXiv 2001

  20. [20]

    Abreu et al.,First neutrino interaction candidates at the LHC, Phys

    F ASERCollaboration, H. Abreu et al.,First neutrino interaction candidates at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 9 L091101, [arXiv:2105.06197]

    work page arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Abreu et al.,The FASER detector, JINST 19 (2024), no

    F ASERCollaboration, H. Abreu et al.,The FASER detector, JINST 19 (2024), no. 05 P05066, [arXiv:2207.11427]

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Abreu et al.,First Direct Observation of Collider Neutrinos with FASER at the LHC, Phys

    F ASERCollaboration, H. Abreu et al.,First Direct Observation of Collider Neutrinos with FASER at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023), no. 3 031801, [arXiv:2303.14185]

    work page arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Mammen Abraham et al.,First Measurement ofνe and νµ Interaction Cross Sections at the LHC with FASER’s Emulsion Detector, Phys

    F ASERCollaboration, R. Mammen Abraham et al.,First Measurement ofνe and νµ Interaction Cross Sections at the LHC with FASER’s Emulsion Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024), no. 2 021802, [arXiv:2403.12520]

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Mammen Abraham et al., First Measurement of the Muon Neutrino Interaction Cross Section and Flux as a Function of Energy at the LHC with FASER, Phys

    F ASERCollaboration, R. Mammen Abraham et al.,First Measurement of the Muon Neutrino Interaction Cross Section and Flux as a Function of Energy at the LHC with FASER, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (2025), no. 21 211801, [arXiv:2412.03186]

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Worcester,The Dawn of Collider Neutrino Physics, APS Physics 16 (7, 2023) 113

    E. Worcester,The Dawn of Collider Neutrino Physics, APS Physics 16 (7, 2023) 113

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Kling and L

    F. Kling and L. J. Nevay,Forward neutrino fluxes at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 11 113008, [arXiv:2105.08270]

    work page arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    Mammen Abraham et al.,Neutrino rate predictions for FASER, Phys

    F ASERCollaboration, R. Mammen Abraham et al.,Neutrino rate predictions for FASER, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 1 012009, [arXiv:2402.13318]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Acampora et al.,SND@LHC: the scattering and neutrino detector at the LHC, JINST 19 (2024), no

    SND@LHC Collaboration, G. Acampora et al.,SND@LHC: the scattering and neutrino detector at the LHC, JINST 19 (2024), no. 05 P05067, [arXiv:2210.02784]

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Mammen Abraham et al.,Prospects and Opportunities with an upgraded FASER Neutrino Detector during the HL-LHC era: Input to the EPPSU, arXiv:2503.19775

    F ASERCollaboration, R. Mammen Abraham et al.,Prospects and Opportunities with an upgraded FASER Neutrino Detector during the HL-LHC era: Input to the EPPSU, arXiv:2503.19775

    work page arXiv

  30. [30]

    Abbaneo et al.,SND@HL-LHC, Scattering and Neutrino Detector in Run 4 of the LHC, tech

    SND@LHC Collaboration, D. Abbaneo et al.,SND@HL-LHC, Scattering and Neutrino Detector in Run 4 of the LHC, tech. rep., CERN, Geneva, 2025

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    L. A. Anchordoqui et al.,The Forward Physics Facility: Sites, experiments, and physics potential, Phys. Rept. 968 (2022) 1–50, [arXiv:2109.10905]. – 19 –

    work page arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    J. L. Feng et al.,The Forward Physics Facility at the High-Luminosity LHC, J. Phys. G 50 (2023), no. 3 030501, [arXiv:2203.05090]

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Adhikary et al.,Scientific program for the Forward Physics Facility, Eur

    J. Adhikary et al.,Scientific program for the Forward Physics Facility, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (2025), no. 4 430, [arXiv:2411.04175]

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    FPF W orking Groups Collaboration, L. A. Anchordoqui et al.,The Forward Physics Facility at the Large Hadron Collider, arXiv:2503.19010

    work page arXiv

  35. [35]

    Ariga, S

    A. Ariga, S. Barwick, J. Boyd, M. Fieg, F. Kling, T. Mäkelä, C. Vendeuvre, and B. Weyer, Detecting LHC Neutrinos at Surface Level, arXiv:2501.06142

    work page arXiv

  36. [36]

    N. W. Kamp, C. A. Argüelles, A. Karle, J. Thomas, and T. Yuan,Lake- and Surface-Based Detectors for Forward Neutrino Physics, arXiv:2501.08278

    work page arXiv

  37. [37]

    J. M. Cruz-Martinez, M. Fieg, T. Giani, P. Krack, T. Mäkelä, T. R. Rabemananjara, and J. Rojo,The LHC as a Neutrino-Ion Collider, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024), no. 4 369, [arXiv:2309.09581]

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Francener, V

    R. Francener, V. P. Goncalves, F. Kling, P. Krack, and J. Rojo,Deep-Inelastic Scattering at TeV Energies with LHC Muons, arXiv:2506.13889

    work page arXiv

  39. [39]

    Maciula and A

    R. Maciula and A. Szczurek,Far-forward production of charm mesons and neutrinos at forward physics facilities at the LHC and the intrinsic charm in the proton, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023), no. 3 034002, [arXiv:2210.08890]

    work page arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    Bhattacharya, F

    A. Bhattacharya, F. Kling, I. Sarcevic, and A. M. Stasto,Forward neutrinos from charm at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 1 014040, [arXiv:2306.01578]

    work page arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Kling, T

    F. Kling, T. Mäkelä, and S. Trojanowski,Investigating the fluxes and physics potential of LHC neutrino experiments, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 9 095020, [arXiv:2309.10417]

    work page arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    Kling, T

    F. Kling, T. Mäkelä, and J. McFayden,Anti-Electron Neutrinos at High-Energy Neutrino Experiments: Identification Strategies and Physics Potential, arXiv:2507.00262

    work page arXiv

  43. [43]

    J. John, F. Kling, J. Koorn, P. Krack, and J. Rojo,A First Determination of the LHC Neutrino Fluxes from FASER Data, arXiv:2507.06022

    work page arXiv

  44. [44]

    L. A. Anchordoqui, C. G. Canal, F. Kling, S. J. Sciutto, and J. F. Soriano,An explanation of the muon puzzle of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays and the role of the Forward Physics Facility for model improvement, JHEAp 34 (2022) 19–32, [arXiv:2202.03095]

    work page arXiv 2022

  45. [45]

    W. Bai, M. Diwan, M. V. Garzelli, Y. S. Jeong, K. Kumar, and M. H. Reno,Forward production of prompt neutrinos from charm in the atmosphere and at high energy colliders, JHEP 10 (2023) 142, [arXiv:2212.07865]

    work page arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    Kling,Probing light gauge bosons in tau neutrino experiments, Phys

    F. Kling,Probing light gauge bosons in tau neutrino experiments, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020), no. 1 015007, [arXiv:2005.03594]

    work page arXiv 2020

  47. [47]

    Ismail, R

    A. Ismail, R. Mammen Abraham, and F. Kling,Neutral current neutrino interactions at FASERν, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021), no. 5 056014, [arXiv:2012.10500]

    work page arXiv 2021

  48. [48]

    Falkowski, M

    A. Falkowski, M. González-Alonso, J. Kopp, Y. Soreq, and Z. Tabrizi,EFT at FASERν, JHEP 10 (2021) 086, [arXiv:2105.12136]

    work page arXiv 2021

  49. [49]

    K. J. Kelly, F. Kling, D. Tuckler, and Y. Zhang,Probing neutrino-portal dark matter at the Forward Physics Facility, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022), no. 7 075026, [arXiv:2111.05868]. – 20 –

    work page arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    Mammen Abraham, S

    R. Mammen Abraham, S. Foroughi-Abari, F. Kling, and Y.-D. Tsai,Neutrino electromagnetic properties and the weak mixing angle at the LHC Forward Physics Facility, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025), no. 1 015029, [arXiv:2301.10254]

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Batell, J

    B. Batell, J. L. Feng, and S. Trojanowski,Detecting Dark Matter with Far-Forward Emulsion and Liquid Argon Detectors at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021), no. 7 075023, [arXiv:2101.10338]

    work page arXiv 2021

  52. [52]

    Batell, J

    B. Batell, J. L. Feng, A. Ismail, F. Kling, R. M. Abraham, and S. Trojanowski,Discovering dark matter at the LHC through its nuclear scattering in far-forward emulsion and liquid argon detectors, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 3 035036, [arXiv:2107.00666]

    work page arXiv 2021

  53. [53]

    Batell, J

    B. Batell, J. L. Feng, M. Fieg, A. Ismail, F. Kling, R. M. Abraham, and S. Trojanowski, Hadrophilic dark sectors at the Forward Physics Facility, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022), no. 7 075001, [arXiv:2111.10343]

    work page arXiv 2022

  54. [54]

    Kling, J.-L

    F. Kling, J.-L. Kuo, S. Trojanowski, and Y.-D. Tsai,FLArE up dark sectors with EM form factors at the LHC forward physics facility, Nucl. Phys. B 987 (2023) 116103, [arXiv:2205.09137]

    work page arXiv 2023

  55. [55]

    Ariga, J

    A. Ariga, J. Boyd, F. Kling, and A. De Roeck,Neutrino Experiments at the Large Hadron Collider, arXiv:2501.10078

    work page arXiv

  56. [56]

    Kling,Neutrino Physics at the LHC: Status and Prospects, in 29th International Symposium on Particles, String and Cosmology, 1, 2025

    F. Kling,Neutrino Physics at the LHC: Status and Prospects, in 29th International Symposium on Particles, String and Cosmology, 1, 2025. arXiv:2501.07152

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Abraham et al., FPF@FCC: neutrino, QCD, and BSM physics opportunities with far-forward experiments at a 100 TeV pro ton col- lider, JHEP 01, 094 (2025) [arXiv:2409.02163]

    R. Mammen Abraham, J. Adhikary, J. L. Feng, M. Fieg, F. Kling, J. Li, J. Pei, T. R. Rabemananjara, J. Rojo, and S. Trojanowski,FPF@FCC: neutrino, QCD, and BSM physics opportunities with far-forward experiments at a 100 TeV Proton Collider, JHEP 01 (2025) 094, [arXiv:2409.02163]

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    B. J. King,Neutrino physics at a muon collider, AIP Conf. Proc. 435 (1998), no. 1 334–348, [hep-ex/9907033]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  59. [59]

    Accettura et al.,Interim report for the International Muon Collider Collaboration (IMCC), CERN YellowRep

    International Muon Collider Collaboration, C. Accettura et al.,Interim report for the International Muon Collider Collaboration (IMCC), CERN YellowRep. Monogr. 2/2024 (2024) 176, [arXiv:2407.12450]

    work page arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    Adhikary, K

    J. Adhikary, K. J. Kelly, F. Kling, and S. Trojanowski,Neutrino-portal dark matter detection prospects at a future muon collider, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025), no. 7 075019, [arXiv:2412.10315]

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Mękała, J

    K. Mękała, J. Reuter, and A. F. Żarnecki,Optimal search reach for heavy neutral leptons at a muon collider, Phys. Lett. B 841 (2023) 137945, [arXiv:2301.02602]

    work page arXiv 2023

  62. [62]

    Mękała, J

    K. Mękała, J. Reuter, and A. F. Żarnecki,Discriminating Majorana and Dirac heavy neutrinos at lepton colliders, JHEP 03 (2024) 075, [arXiv:2312.05223]

    work page arXiv 2024

  63. [63]

    Korshynska, M

    K. Korshynska, M. Löschner, M. Marinichenko, K. Mękała, and J. Reuter,Z’ boson mass reach and model discrimination at muon colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024), no. 6 568, [arXiv:2402.18460]

    work page arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    Bergsma et al.,Experimental Study of the Nucleon Structure – 21 – Functions and of the Gluon Distribution from Charged Current Neutrino and anti-neutrinos Interactions, Phys

    CHARM Collaboration, F. Bergsma et al.,Experimental Study of the Nucleon Structure – 21 – Functions and of the Gluon Distribution from Charged Current Neutrino and anti-neutrinos Interactions, Phys. Lett. B 123 (1983) 269

    work page 1983

  65. [65]

    Precise Measurement of Neutrino and Anti-neutrino Differential Cross Sections

    NuT e VCollaboration, M. Tzanov et al.,Precise measurement of neutrino and anti-neutrino differential cross sections, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 012008, [hep-ex/0509010]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  66. [66]

    Candido, A

    A. Candido, A. Garcia, G. Magni, T. Rabemananjara, J. Rojo, and R. Stegeman,Neutrino Structure Functions from GeV to EeV Energies, JHEP 05 (2023) 149, [arXiv:2302.08527]

    work page arXiv 2023

  67. [67]

    Nuclear Parton Distributions from Lepton-Nucleus Scattering and the Impact of an Electron-Ion Collider

    NNPDF Collaboration, R. Abdul Khalek, J. J. Ethier, and J. Rojo,Nuclear parton distributions from lepton-nucleus scattering and the impact of an electron-ion collider, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019), no. 6 471, [arXiv:1904.00018]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  68. [68]

    R. A. Khalek, J. J. Ethier, E. R. Nocera, and J. Rojo,Self-consistent determination of proton and nuclear PDFs at the Electron Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021), no. 9 096005, [arXiv:2102.00018]

    work page arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    van Beekveld, S

    M. van Beekveld, S. Ferrario Ravasio, E. Groenendijk, P. Krack, J. Rojo, and V. S. Sánchez,A Phenomenological Analysis of LHC Neutrino Scattering at NLO Accuracy Matched to Parton Showers, arXiv:2407.09611

    work page arXiv

  70. [70]

    Ferrario Ravasio, R

    S. Ferrario Ravasio, R. Gauld, B. Jäger, A. Karlberg, and G. Zanderighi,An event generator for neutrino-induced Deep Inelastic Scattering and applications to neutrino astronomy, arXiv:2407.03894

    work page arXiv

  71. [71]

    Buonocore, G

    L. Buonocore, G. Limatola, P. Nason, and F. Tramontano,An event generator for Lepton-Hadron deep inelastic scattering at NLO+PS with POWHEG including mass effects, JHEP 08 (2024) 083, [arXiv:2406.05115]

    work page arXiv 2024

  72. [72]

    WHIZARD: Simulating Multi-Particle Processes at LHC and ILC

    W. Kilian, T. Ohl, and J. Reuter,WHIZARD: Simulating Multi-Particle Processes at LHC and ILC, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1742, [arXiv:0708.4233]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  73. [73]

    P. M. Bredt, W. Kilian, J. Reuter, and P. Stienemeier,NLO electroweak corrections to multi-boson processes at a muon collider, JHEP 12 (2022) 138, [arXiv:2208.09438]

    work page arXiv 2022

  74. [74]

    Dahlén, M

    B. Dahlén, M. Löschner, K. Mękała, J. Reuter, and P. Stylianou,EVAluation of the Equivalent Vector Boson Approximation at highest energy colliders, arXiv:2507.19285

    work page arXiv

  75. [75]

    Reactor neutrino oscillations as constraints on Effective Field Theory

    A. Falkowski, M. González-Alonso, and Z. Tabrizi,Reactor neutrino oscillations as constraints on Effective Field Theory, JHEP 05 (2019) 173, [arXiv:1901.04553]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  76. [76]

    Falkowski, M

    A. Falkowski, M. González-Alonso, and Z. Tabrizi,Consistent QFT description of non-standard neutrino interactions, JHEP 11 (2020) 048, [arXiv:1910.02971]

    work page arXiv 2020

  77. [77]

    Tumasyan et al.,Identification of hadronic tau lepton decays using a deep neural network, JINST 17 (2022) P07023, [arXiv:2201.08458]

    CMS Collaboration, A. Tumasyan et al.,Identification of hadronic tau lepton decays using a deep neural network, JINST 17 (2022) P07023, [arXiv:2201.08458]

    work page arXiv 2022

  78. [78]

    A TLASCollaboration, Reconstruction, Identification, and Calibration of hadronically decaying tau leptons with the ATLAS detector for the LHC Run 3 and reprocessed Run 2 data,

    work page

  79. [79]

    Zyla et al.,Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2020 (2020), no

    Particle Data Group Collaboration, P. Zyla et al.,Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2020 (2020), no. 8 083C01

    work page 2020

  80. [80]

    The Standard Model prediction for R_{e/mu}^{(pi,K)}

    V. Cirigliano and I. Rosell,Two-loop effective theory analysis of pi (K) —> e anti-nu/e [gamma] branching ratios, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 231801, [arXiv:0707.3439]. – 22 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

Showing first 80 references.