REVIEW 5 cited by
MAO-ARAG: Multi-Agent Orchestration for Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
MAO-ARAG: Multi-Agent Orchestration for Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation
read the original abstract
In question-answering (QA) systems, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become pivotal in enhancing response accuracy and reducing hallucination issues. The architecture of RAG systems varies significantly, encompassing single-round RAG, iterative RAG, and reasoning RAG, each tailored to address different types of queries. Due to the varying complexity of real-world queries, a fixed RAG pipeline often struggles to balance performance and cost efficiency across different queries. To address this challenge, we propose an adaptive RAG framework called MAO-ARAG, which leverages multi-agent orchestration. Our adaptive RAG is conceived as a multi-turn framework. Specifically, we define multiple executor agents, representing typical RAG modules such as query reformulation agents, document selection agent, and generation agents. A planner agent intelligently selects and integrates the appropriate agents from these executors into a suitable workflow tailored for each query, striving for high-quality answers while maintaining reasonable costs. During each turn, the planner agent is trained using reinforcement learning, guided by an outcome-based reward (F1 score) and a cost-based penalty, continuously improving answer quality while keeping costs within a reasonable range. Experiments conducted on multiple QA datasets demonstrate that our approach, which dynamically plans workflows for each query, not only achieves high answer quality but also maintains both cost and latency within acceptable limits.The code of MAO-ARAG is on https://github.com/chenyiqun/Agentic-RAG.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
CORAL: Adaptive Retrieval Loop for Culturally-Aligned Multilingual RAG
CORAL uses an agentic loop to adaptively refine retrieval corpora and queries in multilingual RAG based on evidence critique, yielding up to 3.58 percentage point accuracy gains on low-resource language cultural QA be...
-
OASES: Outcome-Aligned Search-Evaluation Co-Training for Agentic Search
OASES co-trains search policies and evaluators to generate outcome-aligned process rewards, outperforming standard RL baselines on five multi-hop QA benchmarks.
-
OASES: Outcome-Aligned Search-Evaluation Co-Training for Agentic Search
OASES co-trains a search policy and an outcome-aligned state evaluator so intermediate search steps get denser, outcome-consistent process rewards and beat strong RL baselines on multi-hop QA.
-
SearchArt: Training Long-Horizon Search Agent with Scalable Synthetic and Verified Task
SearchArt post-trains Qwen3.5-27B on verification-filtered synthetic search trajectories, scoring 74.39 on BrowseComp-ZH, 70.06 on BrowseComp, and 52.55 on DeepResearch-Bench, competitive with several 200B-700B agents.
-
Think Big, Search Small: Where Capacity Matters in Hierarchical Search Agents?
Scaling the delegation backbone in hierarchical search agents improves EM by ~11 points while scaling the executor moves EM by only ~2.6 points, and a 1.7B SFT executor matches a frontier sub-agent at 37% fewer tokens.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.