Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

MAO-ARAG: Multi-Agent Orchestration for Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2508.01005 v1 pith:X6V4RZSO submitted 2025-08-01 cs.CL cs.IR

MAO-ARAG: Multi-Agent Orchestration for Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation

classification cs.CL cs.IR
keywords agentsadaptiveagentgenerationmao-aragqueriesqueryaddress
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In question-answering (QA) systems, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become pivotal in enhancing response accuracy and reducing hallucination issues. The architecture of RAG systems varies significantly, encompassing single-round RAG, iterative RAG, and reasoning RAG, each tailored to address different types of queries. Due to the varying complexity of real-world queries, a fixed RAG pipeline often struggles to balance performance and cost efficiency across different queries. To address this challenge, we propose an adaptive RAG framework called MAO-ARAG, which leverages multi-agent orchestration. Our adaptive RAG is conceived as a multi-turn framework. Specifically, we define multiple executor agents, representing typical RAG modules such as query reformulation agents, document selection agent, and generation agents. A planner agent intelligently selects and integrates the appropriate agents from these executors into a suitable workflow tailored for each query, striving for high-quality answers while maintaining reasonable costs. During each turn, the planner agent is trained using reinforcement learning, guided by an outcome-based reward (F1 score) and a cost-based penalty, continuously improving answer quality while keeping costs within a reasonable range. Experiments conducted on multiple QA datasets demonstrate that our approach, which dynamically plans workflows for each query, not only achieves high answer quality but also maintains both cost and latency within acceptable limits.The code of MAO-ARAG is on https://github.com/chenyiqun/Agentic-RAG.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CORAL: Adaptive Retrieval Loop for Culturally-Aligned Multilingual RAG

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    CORAL uses an agentic loop to adaptively refine retrieval corpora and queries in multilingual RAG based on evidence critique, yielding up to 3.58 percentage point accuracy gains on low-resource language cultural QA be...

  2. OASES: Outcome-Aligned Search-Evaluation Co-Training for Agentic Search

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    OASES co-trains search policies and evaluators to generate outcome-aligned process rewards, outperforming standard RL baselines on five multi-hop QA benchmarks.

  3. OASES: Outcome-Aligned Search-Evaluation Co-Training for Agentic Search

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    OASES co-trains a search policy and an outcome-aligned state evaluator so intermediate search steps get denser, outcome-consistent process rewards and beat strong RL baselines on multi-hop QA.

  4. SearchArt: Training Long-Horizon Search Agent with Scalable Synthetic and Verified Task

    cs.IR 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    SearchArt post-trains Qwen3.5-27B on verification-filtered synthetic search trajectories, scoring 74.39 on BrowseComp-ZH, 70.06 on BrowseComp, and 52.55 on DeepResearch-Bench, competitive with several 200B-700B agents.

  5. Think Big, Search Small: Where Capacity Matters in Hierarchical Search Agents?

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Scaling the delegation backbone in hierarchical search agents improves EM by ~11 points while scaling the executor moves EM by only ~2.6 points, and a 1.7B SFT executor matches a frontier sub-agent at 37% fewer tokens.