Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 85 references

Twistronics and moir\'e superlattice physics in 2D transition metal dichalcogenides

T0 review · 3 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This review sets out to establish that moiré superlattices made from twisted or lattice-mismatched semiconducting transition metal dichalcogenides form a single, highly tunable platform for optical, topological, and strongly correlated…

desk verdict The submission is a metadata-body mismatch—an unrelated computer-vision paper attached to a TMD moiré review abstract—so the claimed review cannot be evaluated. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.01584 v1 pith:63GUDQPN submitted 2025-08-03 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Dawei Zhai , Hongyi Yu , Wang Yao This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords moirésuperlatticestransitionmetaldichalcogenidestwistronicsopticalphenomenatopologicalcorrelation2Dsemiconductorstunablequantumplatforms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review sets out to establish that moiré superlattices made from twisted or lattice-mismatched semiconducting transition metal dichalcogenides form a single, highly tunable platform for optical, topological, and strongly correlated phenomena. If the review is right, twist angle and lattice mismatch become practical control knobs for engineering quantum phases in a solid-state setting, bringing experimental and theoretical work under one framework. The abstract promises an overview of fundamental properties and major breakthroughs; the supplied full text is an unrelated manuscript, so this synthesis rests on the abstract alone.

What carries the argument

The moiré superlattice is the central object: a nanoscale periodic pattern formed when two atomic layers with slightly different lattice constants or orientations are stacked. Its role in the argument is to convert a geometric mismatch into a controllable electronic potential, producing flat bands and localised states whose properties shift with twist angle and lattice mismatch. This geometric-to-electronic mapping carries the review's thesis that a single platform can host and tune optical, topological, and correlation phenomena.

What would settle it

A repeated high-resolution measurement of the lowest moiré exciton energy in a TMD bilayer as a function of twist angle that shows no systematic shift over a wide angular range would contradict the central tunability claim around which the review is organised.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that TMD moiré superlattices are a versatile platform with unprecedented tunability for condensed matter physics. The moiré pattern created by twisting or lattice mismatch reorganises the electronic structure into narrow bands and periodic potentials, and this reorganisation can be controlled by geometry rather than chemistry. The review accordingly organizes the field around three families of phenomena—optical, topological, and correlation effects—and presents recent experimental and theoretical progress as evidence that these phenomena coexist and can be tuned in the same material class.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the cited experiments and theories are reliable and representative; if key reported results were wrong or outliers, the picture of a tunable multi-phenomenon platform would lose its foundation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Twist angle and lattice mismatch become continuous experimental dials for controlling electronic bands and localised states.
  • Excitonic response in TMD moirés could serve as an optical fingerprint of underlying correlated or topological order.
  • Semiconducting moiré lattices widen the space for engineering correlated states beyond graphene-based twistronics systems.
  • A unified framework for optical, topological, and correlation physics in one material stack sharpens the search for device applications.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The abstract's emphasis on unprecedented tunability implies, though the review does not explicitly claim, that twist angle could be tuned continuously in situ; a testable extension would be devices with continuously rotatable layers that track property changes in real time.
  • Because the supplied full text is an unrelated computer-vision manuscript, the review's detailed evidence and citations are unavailable here; a full assessment would need the actual review body.
  • A natural extension is to use electric fields or strain in addition to twist angle to sweep through the same band-structure regimes, which the review's platform view would accommodate but does not itself propose.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript is submitted as a review of moiré superlattice physics in two-dimensional semiconducting transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs). The abstract states that the review will cover fundamental properties and major breakthroughs in this field. However, the full text of the submission is a computer-vision paper titled "Set Pivot Learning: Redefining Generalized Segmentation with Vision Foundation Models," with no TMD or moiré content whatsoever. The document therefore does not contain the claimed review, and there is no scientific content to evaluate.

Significance. A well-executed review of TMD moiré physics would be valuable to the condensed-matter community, particularly given the rapid recent progress in optical, topological, and correlation phenomena. However, as submitted, the manuscript contains no such review: no TMD-specific results, derivations, data, or survey of the literature are present. The abstract alone asserts a purpose but provides no content. Consequently, the contribution cannot be assessed, and the submission has no verifiable scientific significance in its current form.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full Text, entire body] The full text (arXiv:2508.01582) is an unrelated computer-vision paper, titled "Set Pivot Learning: Redefining Generalized Segmentation with Vision Foundation Models." It contains no discussion of TMDs, moiré superlattices, twist angles, lattice mismatch, or any topic named in the abstract. This is a load-bearing mismatch: the central claim that the document provides a review of TMD moiré physics is false for the submitted material.
  2. [Abstract vs. body] The abstract's assertion that "This review aims to provide an overview of the fundamental properties of TMDs moiré superlattices" is unsupported by the body text. The body's sections, figures, and references all concern computer vision (e.g., domain generalization, segmentation, vision foundation models), and no TMD-specific content appears anywhere. Therefore the manuscript cannot be reviewed as a TMD moiré review; the abstract and body are not about the same work.
  3. [References and bibliography] The bibliography consists entirely of computer-vision references (CVPR, ICCV, ECCV, AAAI, IEEE TPAMI, etc.) and includes no references from the TMD moiré literature. Even if the abstract were considered a standalone claim, there is no supporting scholarly apparatus to verify the claimed overview of breakthroughs or fundamental properties.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation chain exists to evaluate: the supplied body is an unrelated computer-vision paper, not the claimed TMD moiré review.

full rationale

The submission's abstract claims to review moiré superlattice physics in 2D transition metal dichalcogenides, but the full text provided is arXiv:2508.01582, 'Set Pivot Learning: Redefining Generalized Segmentation with Vision Foundation Models,' which contains no TMD moiré content, no equations from moiré physics, and no derivation chain that could be circular. The circularity analysis requires exhibiting a specific reduction, such as an equation being equivalent to its input by construction or a fitted parameter being renamed as a prediction. No such reduction can be quoted because the relevant scientific content is entirely absent. The mismatch between the claimed document and its body is a substantive integrity or provenance problem, but it is not a circularity problem in the sense of self-definitional reasoning, fitted input called prediction, or load-bearing self-citation. Therefore the honest finding is no circularity, scored 0, with no circular steps identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No technical derivation is present, so there are no free parameters or invented entities to audit. The only assumption we can identify is the stated purpose of a review: faithful synthesis of existing work.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption The primary literature cited in the (missing) review is accurate and representative of the field.
    A review's value depends on the correctness of the works it summarizes. Since the full text is unavailable, this assumption is the only load-bearing premise we can infer from the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Twistronics and moir\'e superlattice physics in 2D transition metal dichalcogenides." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/63GUDQPN

@misc{pith2026250801584,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Twistronics and moir\'e superlattice physics in 2D transition metal dichalcogenides},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/63GUDQPN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.01584}
}
read the original abstract

The moir\'e superlattices formed by stacking 2D semiconducting transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) with twisting angle or lattice mismatch have provided a versatile platform with unprecedented tunability for exploring many frontier topics in condensed matter physics, including optical, topological and correlation phenomena. This field of study advances rapidly and a plethora of exciting experimental and theoretical progresses have been achieved recently. This review aims to provide an overview of the fundamental properties of TMDs moir\'e superlattices, as well as highlight some of the major breakthroughs in this captivating field.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [14]

    Feddg: Federated domain generalization on medical image segmentation via episodic learning in continuous frequency space,

    Q. Liu, C. Chen, J. Qin, Q. Dou, and P.-A. Heng, “Feddg: Federated domain generalization on medical image segmentation via episodic learning in continuous frequency space,” in CVPR, 2021, pp. 1013– 1023

    2021

  2. [15]

    Semantic seg- mentation with generative models: Semi-supervised learning and strong out-of-domain generalization,

    D. Li, J. Yang, K. Kreis, A. Torralba, and S. Fidler, “Semantic seg- mentation with generative models: Semi-supervised learning and strong out-of-domain generalization,” in CVPR, 2021, pp. 8296–8307

    2021

  3. [16]

    Moment matching for multi-source domain adaptation,

    X. Peng, Q. Bai, X. Xia, Z. Huang, K. Saenko, and B. Wang, “Moment matching for multi-source domain adaptation,” in ICCV, 2019, pp. 1406– 1415

    2019

  4. [17]

    Self-supervised universal domain adaptation with adaptive memory separation,

    R. Zhu and S. Li, “Self-supervised universal domain adaptation with adaptive memory separation,” in ICDM, 2021, pp. 1547–1552

    work page 2021

  5. [18]

    Batch-instance normalization for adaptively style-invariant neural networks,

    H. Nam and H.-E. Kim, “Batch-instance normalization for adaptively style-invariant neural networks,” in NeurIPS, 2018, pp. 2563–2572

    work page 2018

  6. [19]

    Frustratingly easy person re- identification: Generalizing person re-id in practice,

    J. Jia, Q. Ruan, and T. M. Hospedales, “Frustratingly easy person re- identification: Generalizing person re-id in practice,” in BMVC, 2019, p. 117

    work page 2019

  7. [20]

    Episodic training for domain generalization,

    D. Li, J. Zhang, Y . Yang, C. Liu, Y .-Z. Song, and T. M. Hospedales, “Episodic training for domain generalization,” in ICCV, 2019, pp. 1446– 1455

    work page 2019

  8. [21]

    Open domain generalization with domain-augmented meta-learning,

    Y . Shu, Z. Cao, C. Wang, J. Wang, and M. Long, “Open domain generalization with domain-augmented meta-learning,” in CVPR, 2021, pp. 9619–9628

    work page 2021

Show all 85 references
  1. [22]

    Pin the memory: Learning to generalize semantic segmentation,

    J. Y . Kim, J. Lee, J. Park, D. Min, and K. Sohn, “Pin the memory: Learning to generalize semantic segmentation,” in CVPR, 2022, pp. 4350–4360

    2022

  2. [23]

    Domain generalization with adversarial feature learning,

    H. Li, S. J. Pan, S. Wang, and A. C. Kot, “Domain generalization with adversarial feature learning,” in CVPR, 2018, pp. 5400–5409

    2018

  3. [24]

    Unified deep supervised domain adaptation and generalization,

    S. Motiian, M. Piccirilli, D. A. Adjeroh, and G. Doretto, “Unified deep supervised domain adaptation and generalization,” in ICCV, 2017, pp. 5715–5725

    2017

  4. [25]

    Domain generalization via model-agnostic learning of semantic features,

    Q. Dou, D. Coelho de Castro, K. Kamnitsas, and B. Glocker, “Domain generalization via model-agnostic learning of semantic features,” in NeurIPS, 2019, pp. 6447–6458

    2019

  5. [26]

    Learning generalized knowledge from a single domain on urban-scene segmentation,

    X. Li, M. Li, X. Li, and X. Guo, “Learning generalized knowledge from a single domain on urban-scene segmentation,” IEEE TMM, vol. 25, pp. 7635–7646, 2023

    2023

  6. [27]

    Dirl: Domain-invariant representation learning for generalizable semantic segmentation,

    Q. Xu, L. Yao, Z. Jiang, G. Jiang, W. Chu, W. Han, W. Zhang, C. Wang, and Y . Tai, “Dirl: Domain-invariant representation learning for generalizable semantic segmentation,” in AAAI, 2022, pp. 2884–2892

    2022

  7. [28]

    Siamdoge: Domain generalizable semantic segmentation using siamese network,

    Z. Wu, X. Wu, X. Zhang, L. Ju, and S. Wang, “Siamdoge: Domain generalizable semantic segmentation using siamese network,” in ECCV, 2022, pp. 603–620

    2022

  8. [29]

    Progressive diversity generation for single domain generalization,

    D. Rui, K. Guo, X. Zhu, Z. Wu, and H. Fang, “Progressive diversity generation for single domain generalization,” IEEE TMM , vol. 26, pp. 10 200–10 210, 2024

    2024

  9. [30]

    Generalizing to unseen domains via adversarial data augmentation,

    R. V olpi, H. Namkoong, O. Sener, J. C. Duchi, V . Murino, and S. Savarese, “Generalizing to unseen domains via adversarial data augmentation,” in NeurIPS, 2018, pp. 5339–5349

    2018

  10. [31]

    Learning to learn single domain generalization,

    F. Qiao, L. Zhao, and X. Peng, “Learning to learn single domain generalization,” in CVPR, 2020, pp. 12 553–12 562

    2020

  11. [32]

    improved the generalization of the network by learning to generate diverse images and designing mutual information optimization strategy. Additionally, single-source DG methods have explored techniques such as style transfer [33], [34] and domain randomization [35], [36] to au...

    2021

  12. [33]

    Learning to diversify for single domain generalization,

    Z. Wang, Y . Luo, R. Qiu, Z. Huang, and M. Baktashmotlagh, “Learning to diversify for single domain generalization,” in ICCV, 2021, pp. 834– 843

    2021

  13. [34]

    Structured domain randomization: Bridg- ing the reality gap by context-aware synthetic data,

    A. Prakash, S. Boochoon, M. Brophy, D. Acuna, E. Cameracci, G. State, O. Shapira, and S. Birchfield, “Structured domain randomization: Bridg- ing the reality gap by context-aware synthetic data,” in ICRA, 2019, pp. 7249–7255

    2019

  14. [35]

    Global and local texture randomization for synthetic-to-real semantic segmentation,

    D. Peng, Y . Lei, L. Liu, P. Zhang, and J. Liu, “Global and local texture randomization for synthetic-to-real semantic segmentation,” IEEE TIP , vol. 30, pp. 6594–6608, 2021

    2021

  15. [36]

    Domain randomization and pyramid consistency: Simulation- to-real generalization without accessing target domain data,

    X. Yue, Y . Zhang, S. Zhao, A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, K. Keutzer, and B. Gong, “Domain randomization and pyramid consistency: Simulation- to-real generalization without accessing target domain data,” in ICCV, 2019, pp. 2100–2110

    2019

  16. [37]

    Fsdr: Frequency space domain randomization for domain generalization,

    J. Huang, D. Guan, A. Xiao, and S. Lu, “Fsdr: Frequency space domain randomization for domain generalization,” in CVPR, 2021, pp. 6887– 6898

    2021

  17. [38]

    Two at once: Enhancing learning and generalization capacities via ibn-net,

    X. Pan, P. Luo, J. Shi, and X. Tang, “Two at once: Enhancing learning and generalization capacities via ibn-net,” in ECCV, 2018, pp. 484–500

    2018

  18. [39]

    Learning to optimize domain specific normalization for domain generalization,

    S. Seo, Y . Suh, D. Kim, J. Han, and B. Han, “Learning to optimize domain specific normalization for domain generalization,” in ECCV, 2020, pp. 159–176

    2020

  19. [40]

    Semantic-aware domain generalized segmentation,

    D. Peng, Y . Lei, M. Hayat, Y . Guo, and W. Li, “Semantic-aware domain generalized segmentation,” in CVPR, 2022, pp. 2594–2605

    2022

  20. [41]

    Learning domain adaptive object detection with probabilistic teacher,

    M. Chen, W. Chen, S. Yang, J. Song, X. Wang, L. Zhang, Y . Yan, D. Qi, Y . Zhuang, D. Xie et al. , “Learning domain adaptive object detection with probabilistic teacher,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.06293 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  21. [42]

    Domain generalization via balancing training difficulty and model capability,

    X. Jiang, J. Huang, S. Jin, and S. Lu, “Domain generalization via balancing training difficulty and model capability,” in ICCV, 2023, pp. 18 993–19 003

    2023

  22. [43]

    A simple recipe for language-guided domain generalized segmentation,

    M. Fahes, T.-H. Vu, A. Bursuc, P. P ´erez, and R. de Charette, “A simple recipe for language-guided domain generalized segmentation,” in CVPR, June 2024, pp. 23 428–23 437

    2024

  23. [45]

    Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition,

    K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman, “Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 , 2014

    2014 arXiv

  24. [46]

    Shufflenet v2: Practical guidelines for efficient cnn architecture design,

    N. Ma, X. Zhang, H.-T. Zheng, and J. Sun, “Shufflenet v2: Practical guidelines for efficient cnn architecture design,” in ECCV, 2018, pp. 116–131

    2018

  25. [47]

    Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database,

    J. Deng, W. Dong, R. Socher, L.-J. Li, K. Li, and L. Fei-Fei, “Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database,” inCVPR, 2009, pp. 248–255

    2009

  26. [48]

    Clip the gap: A single domain generalization approach for object detection,

    V . Vidit, M. Engilberge, and M. Salzmann, “Clip the gap: A single domain generalization approach for object detection,” in CVPR, 2023, pp. 3219–3229

    2023

  27. [49]

    Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners,

    K. He, X. Chen, S. Xie, Y . Li, P. Doll ´ar, and R. Girshick, “Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners,” in CVPR, 2022, pp. 16 000– 16 009

    2022

  28. [50]

    Segment anything,

    A. Kirillov, E. Mintun, N. Ravi, H. Mao, C. Rolland, L. Gustafson, T. Xiao, S. Whitehead, A. C. Berg, W.-Y . Loet al., “Segment anything,” in ICCV, 2023, pp. 4015–4026

    2023

  29. [52]

    Eva-02: A visual representation for neon genesis,

    Y . Fang, Q. Sun, X. Wang, T. Huang, X. Wang, and Y . Cao, “Eva-02: A visual representation for neon genesis,” Image and Vision Computing, vol. 149, p. 105171, 2024

    2024

  30. [53]

    Dinov2: Learning robust visual features without supervision,

    M. Oquab, T. Darcet, T. Moutakanni, H. V o, M. Szafraniec, V . Khalidov, P. Fernandez, D. Haziza, F. Massa, A. El-Nouby et al. , “Dinov2: Learning robust visual features without supervision,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07193, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  31. [54]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision,

    A. Radford, J. W. Kim, C. Hallacy, A. Ramesh, G. Goh, S. Agarwal, G. Sastry, A. Askell, P. Mishkin, J. Clark et al., “Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision,” in ICML. PMLR, 2021, pp. 8748–8763

    2021

  32. [55]

    Lisa: Reasoning segmentation via large language model,

    X. Lai, Z. Tian, Y . Chen, Y . Li, Y . Yuan, S. Liu, and J. Jia, “Lisa: Reasoning segmentation via large language model,” in CVPR, 2024, pp. 9579–9589

    2024

  33. [56]

    Segment anything in medical images,

    J. Ma, Y . He, F. Li, L. Han, C. You, and B. Wang, “Segment anything in medical images,” Nature Communications, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 654, 2024

    2024

  34. [57]

    Anydoor: Zero-shot object-level image customization,

    X. Chen, L. Huang, Y . Liu, Y . Shen, D. Zhao, and H. Zhao, “Anydoor: Zero-shot object-level image customization,” in CVPR, 2024, pp. 6593– 6602

    2024

  35. [58]

    End-to-end autonomous driving: Challenges and frontiers,

    L. Chen, P. Wu, K. Chitta, B. Jaeger, A. Geiger, and H. Li, “End-to-end autonomous driving: Challenges and frontiers,” IEEE TPAMI, 2024

    2024

  36. [59]

    These VFMs are trained on datasets of hundreds of terabytes or even larger, encompassing not only images but also a wide range of modalities, including videos and texts

    employ backbones such as CLIP [53], SAM [49], or DINOv2 [52]. These VFMs are trained on datasets of hundreds of terabytes or even larger, encompassing not only images but also a wide range of modalities, including videos and texts. Notably, as shown in Fig. 1, even frozen VFMs...

    2021

  37. [60]

    Learning domain-aware detection head with prompt tuning,

    H. Li, R. Zhang, H. Yao, X. Song, Y . Hao, Y . Zhao, L. Li, and Y . Chen, “Learning domain-aware detection head with prompt tuning,” NIPS, vol. 36, 2024

    2024

  38. [61]

    Collaborating foundation models for domain generalized semantic segmentation,

    Y . Benigmim, S. Roy, S. Essid, V . Kalogeiton, and S. Lathuili `ere, “Collaborating foundation models for domain generalized semantic segmentation,” in CVPR, 2024, pp. 3108–3119

    2024

  39. [62]

    A simple recipe for language-guided domain generalized segmentation,

    M. Fahes, T.-H. Vu, A. Bursuc, P. P ´erez, and R. de Charette, “A simple recipe for language-guided domain generalized segmentation,” in CVPR, 2024, pp. 23 428–23 437

    2024

  40. [63]

    Eclipse: Efficient continual learning in panoptic segmentation with visual prompt tuning,

    B. Kim, J. Yu, and S. J. Hwang, “Eclipse: Efficient continual learning in panoptic segmentation with visual prompt tuning,” in CVPR, 2024, pp. 3346–3356

    2024

  41. [64]

    Poda: Prompt-driven zero-shot domain adaptation,

    M. Fahes, T.-H. Vu, A. Bursuc, P. P ´erez, and R. de Charette, “Poda: Prompt-driven zero-shot domain adaptation,” in ICCV, October 2023, pp. 18 623–18 633

    2023

  42. [65]

    Domain adaptation via prompt learning,

    C. Ge, R. Huang, M. Xie, Z. Lai, S. Song, S. Li, and G. Huang, “Domain adaptation via prompt learning,” IEEE TNNLS, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1160– 1170, 2025

    2025

  43. [66]

    Split to merge: Unifying separated modalities for unsupervised domain adaptation,

    X. Li, Y . Li, Z. Du, F. Li, K. Lu, and J. Li, “Split to merge: Unifying separated modalities for unsupervised domain adaptation,” in CVPR, 2024, pp. 23 364–23 374

    2024

  44. [67]

    Coda: In- structive chain-of-domain adaptation with severity-aware visual prompt tuning,

    Z. Gong, F. Li, Y . Deng, D. Bhattacharjee, X. Zhu, and Z. Ji, “Coda: In- structive chain-of-domain adaptation with severity-aware visual prompt tuning,” in ECCV. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024, pp. 130–148

    2024

  45. [68]

    Unified language-driven zero-shot domain adaptation,

    S. Yang, Z. Tian, L. Jiang, and J. Jia, “Unified language-driven zero-shot domain adaptation,” in CVPR, 2024, pp. 23 407–23 415. JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 14, NO. 8, AUGUST 2021 13

    2024

  46. [69]

    Textual query-driven mask transformer for domain generalized segmentation,

    B. Pak, B. Woo, S. Kim, D.-h. Kim, and H. Kim, “Textual query-driven mask transformer for domain generalized segmentation,” in ECCV. Springer, 2024, pp. 37–54

    2024

  47. [70]

    Maple: Multi-modal prompt learning,

    M. U. Khattak, H. Rasheed, M. Maaz, S. Khan, and F. S. Khan, “Maple: Multi-modal prompt learning,” in CVPR, 2023, pp. 19 113–19 122

    2023

  48. [71]

    Mmap: Multi- modal alignment prompt for cross-domain multi-task learning,

    Y . Xin, J. Du, Q. Wang, K. Yan, and S. Ding, “Mmap: Multi- modal alignment prompt for cross-domain multi-task learning,” in AAAI, vol. 38, no. 14, 2024, pp. 16 076–16 084

    2024

  49. [72]

    Explor- ing visual prompts for adapting large-scale models,

    H. Bahng, A. Jahanian, S. Sankaranarayanan, and P. Isola, “Explor- ing visual prompts for adapting large-scale models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.17274, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  50. [73]

    Masked retraining teacher-student framework for domain adaptive object detection,

    Z. Zhao, S. Wei, Q. Chen, D. Li, Y . Yang, Y . Peng, and Y . Liu, “Masked retraining teacher-student framework for domain adaptive object detection,” in ICCV, 2023, pp. 19 039–19 049

    2023

  51. [74]

    Learning content-enhanced mask trans- former for domain generalized urban-scene segmentation,

    Q. Bi, S. You, and T. Gevers, “Learning content-enhanced mask trans- former for domain generalized urban-scene segmentation,” in Proceed- ings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , vol. 38, no. 2, 2024, pp. 819–827

    2024

  52. [75]

    Visual prompt tuning,

    M. Jia, L. Tang, B.-C. Chen, C. Cardie, S. Belongie, B. Hariharan, and S.-N. Lim, “Visual prompt tuning,” in ECCV. Springer, 2022, pp. 709–727

    2022

  53. [76]

    The power of scale for parameter-efficient prompt tuning,

    B. Lester, R. Al-Rfou, and N. Constant, “The power of scale for parameter-efficient prompt tuning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.08691 , 2021

    2021 arXiv

  54. [77]

    Prompt-based distribution alignment for unsupervised domain adaptation,

    S. Bai, M. Zhang, W. Zhou, S. Huang, Z. Luan, D. Wang, and B. Chen, “Prompt-based distribution alignment for unsupervised domain adaptation,” in AAAI, vol. 38, no. 2, 2024, pp. 729–737

    2024

  55. [78]

    Playing for data: Ground truth from computer games,

    S. R. Richter, V . Vineet, S. Roth, and V . Koltun, “Playing for data: Ground truth from computer games,” in ECCV, 2016, pp. 102–118

    2016

  56. [79]

    The cityscapes dataset for semantic urban scene understanding,

    M. Cordts, M. Omran, S. Ramos, T. Rehfeld, M. Enzweiler, R. Benen- son, U. Franke, S. Roth, and B. Schiele, “The cityscapes dataset for semantic urban scene understanding,” in CVPR, 2016, pp. 3213–3223

    2016

  57. [80]

    The mapillary vistas dataset for semantic understanding of street scenes,

    G. Neuhold, T. Ollmann, S. R. Bul `o, and P. Kontschieder, “The mapillary vistas dataset for semantic understanding of street scenes,” in ICCV, 2017, pp. 5000–5009

    2017

  58. [81]

    Adaptive texture filtering for single-domain generalized segmentation,

    X. Li, M. Li, Y . Wang, C.-X. Ren, and X. Guo, “Adaptive texture filtering for single-domain generalized segmentation,” in AAAI, 2023, pp. 1442– 1450

    2023

  59. [82]

    Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks,

    A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton, “Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks,” NIPS, vol. 25, 2012

    2012

  60. [83]

    Blip: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training for unified vision-language understanding and generation,

    J. Li, D. Li, C. Xiong, and S. Hoi, “Blip: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training for unified vision-language understanding and generation,” in International conference on machine learning . PMLR, 2022, pp. 12 888–12 900

    2022

  61. [84]

    Modern hierarchical, agglomerative clustering algorithms,

    D. M ¨ullner, “Modern hierarchical, agglomerative clustering algorithms,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1109.2378 , 2011

    2011 arXiv

  62. [85]

    Adversarial style aug- mentation for domain generalized urban-scene segmentation,

    Z. Zhong, Y . Zhao, G. H. Lee, and N. Sebe, “Adversarial style aug- mentation for domain generalized urban-scene segmentation,” in NIPS, vol. 35, 2022, pp. 338–350

    2022

  63. [86]

    Pasta: Proportional amplitude spectrum training augmentation for syn- to-real domain generalization,

    P. Chattopadhyay, K. Sarangmath, V . Vijaykumar, and J. Hoffman, “Pasta: Proportional amplitude spectrum training augmentation for syn- to-real domain generalization,” in ICCV, October 2023, pp. 19 288– 19 300

    2023

  64. [87]

    Masked-attention mask transformer for universal image segmentation,

    B. Cheng, I. Misra, A. G. Schwing, A. Kirillov, and R. Girdhar, “Masked-attention mask transformer for universal image segmentation,” in CVPR, 2022, p. 1290–1299

    2022

  65. [88]

    Eva-02: A visual representation for neon genesis,

    Y . Fang, Q. Sun, X. Wang, T. Huang, X. Wang, and Y . Cao, “Eva-02: A visual representation for neon genesis,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.11331, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  66. [89]

    Eva: Exploring the limits of masked visual representation learning at scale,

    Y . Fang, W. Wang, B. Xie, Q. Sun, L. Wu, X. Wang, T. Huang, X. Wang, and Y . Cao, “Eva: Exploring the limits of masked visual representation learning at scale,” in CVPR, 2023, pp. 19 358–19 369

    2023

  67. [90]

    Hgformer: Hierarchical grouping transformer for domain generalized semantic segmentation,

    J. Ding, N. Xue, G.-S. Xia, B. Schiele, and D. Dai, “Hgformer: Hierarchical grouping transformer for domain generalized semantic segmentation,” in CVPR, 2023, pp. 15 413–15 423

    2023

  68. [91]

    Deep residual learning for image recognition,

    K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, “Deep residual learning for image recognition,” in CVPR, 2016, pp. 770–778

    2016

  69. [92]

    Acdc: The adverse conditions dataset with correspondences for semantic driving scene understanding,

    C. Sakaridis, D. Dai, and L. Van Gool, “Acdc: The adverse conditions dataset with correspondences for semantic driving scene understanding,” in ICCV, 2021, pp. 10 765–10 775

    2021

  70. [93]

    The synthia dataset: A large collection of synthetic images for semantic segmentation of urban scenes,

    G. Ros, L. Sellart, J. Materzynska, D. V ´azquez, and A. M. L ´opez, “The synthia dataset: A large collection of synthetic images for semantic segmentation of urban scenes,” in CVPR, 2016, pp. 3234–3243

    2016

  71. [94]

    Pin the memory: Learning to generalize semantic segmentation,

    J. Kim, J. Lee, J. Park, D. Min, and K. Sohn, “Pin the memory: Learning to generalize semantic segmentation,” in CVPR, 2022, pp. 4350–4360

    2022

  72. [95]

    Wildnet: Learning domain generalized semantic segmentation from the wild,

    S. Lee, H. Seong, S. Lee, and E. Kim, “Wildnet: Learning domain generalized semantic segmentation from the wild,” in CVPR, 2022, pp. 9936–9946

    2022

  73. [96]

    Dynamically instance-guided adaptation: A backward-free approach for test-time domain adaptive semantic segmentation,

    W. Wang, Z. Zhong, W. Wang, X. Chen, C. Ling, B. Wang, and N. Sebe, “Dynamically instance-guided adaptation: A backward-free approach for test-time domain adaptive semantic segmentation,” in CVPR, 2023, pp. 24 090–24 099

    2023

  74. [97]

    Bdd100k: A diverse driving dataset for heterogeneous multitask learning,

    F. Yu, H. Chen, X. Wang, W. Xian, Y . Chen, F. Liu, V . Madhavan, and T. Darrell, “Bdd100k: A diverse driving dataset for heterogeneous multitask learning,” in CVPR, 2020, pp. 2633–2642

    2020

  75. [98]

    Mmsegmentation: Openmmlab semantic segmentation toolbox and benchmark,

    M. Contributors, “Mmsegmentation: Openmmlab semantic segmentation toolbox and benchmark,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/ open-mmlab/mmsegmentation

    2020

  76. [99]

    A method for stochastic optimization,

    D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, “A method for stochastic optimization,” in ICLR, 2015, p. 6

    2015

  77. [100]

    The pascal visual object classes challenge: A retrospective,

    M. Everingham, S. Eslami, L. Van Gool, C. K. Williams, J. Winn, and A. Zisserman, “The pascal visual object classes challenge: A retrospective,” IJCV, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 98–136, 2015

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.