Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 52 references

Families of Transfers from circular low Earth orbit to Distant Prograde Orbit around the Moon

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A grid-search and continuation study finds 5,663,373 valid bi-impulsive transfers from a 167 km low Earth orbit to the Moon's 1:1 distant prograde orbit, organized into twelve families.

desk verdict A useful and honest numerical census of LEO-to-DPO transfers, but the twelve-family taxonomy is a manual interpretation rather than a proven partition. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.01769 v1 pith:RFE6ELRS submitted 2025-08-03 astro-ph.EP math.OC

Shuyue Fu , Di Wu , Yihan Peng , Peng Shi , Shengping Gong This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EPmath.OC MSC 70F0770F1570M20
keywords Planarcircularrestrictedthree-bodyproblemDistantprogradeorbitEarth-MoontransferfamiliesGridsearchTrajectorycontinuationBi-impulsiveLunarmissiondesign
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the bi-impulsive transfer problem from a 167 km circular low Earth orbit to the Moon's 1:1 distant prograde orbit has a large and structured solution space, not just a few hand-built trajectories. By seeding a grid search with backward-propagated states from the target orbit and then extending the solutions with a linear predictor-corrector continuation, the authors obtain 5,663,373 valid solutions and sort them into twelve transfer families, most of which they argue are new or underexplored. The families span total $\Delta v$ from about 3.32 to 3.76 km/s, Earth-injection impulses of 3.12-3.15 km/s, Moon-insertion impulses of 0.20-0.61 km/s, and flight times of 4 to 112 days. A sympathetic reader would care because this turns a mission-design question into a catalog: fast transfers for crewed missions (F1, F2) and low-fuel transfers for cargo or surveillance missions (F4, F6-F12) can be picked directly from the mapped families.

What carries the argument

The construction rests on two linked objects. First, a backward-propagation grid search: initial guesses are generated by choosing a time phase $\tau_f$ along the DPO and a velocity ratio $\beta_f$ at the insertion point, propagating backward from the DPO for up to $12\pi$ time units, and keeping states that nearly satisfy the low-Earth-orbit constraints $\boldsymbol{\psi}_i$. Second, a predictor-corrector continuation whose predictor is a linear map derived from the state transition matrix $\mathbf{\Phi}(t_i, t_f)$: the feasible direction $\delta\boldsymbol{y}$ is the right singular vector $\boldsymbol{V}_3$ from the singular value decomposition of the $2 \times 3$ constraint Jacobian $\boldsymbol{A} = \partial\boldsymbol{\psi}_i/\partial\boldsymbol{y}$, so each new solution is predicted by $\tilde{\boldsymbol{y}}_1 = \boldsymbol{y}_0 + \delta\boldsymbol{y}\,\Delta s$ and then corrected with a least-squares solver. This mechanism lets the authors extend sparse initial guesses into long continuous families.

What would settle it

A finer grid search (e.g., $\tau_f$ step below $\pi/5000$ and $\beta_f$ step below $0.0001$) that finds a continuous solution curve bridging any pair among F6-F9 or F11-F12 would collapse the corresponding family labels and change the reported ranges.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the planar circular restricted three-body model of the Earth-Moon system, transfers from a 167 km circular low Earth orbit to a 1:1 distant prograde orbit are not scarce: a dense grid of insertion-phase and velocity-ratio parameters, together with continuation, yields 5,663,373 corrected solutions. These solutions organize into twelve families, labeled F1-F12, distinguished by the number of Earth revolutions, the shape of the solution curves in the (TOF, $\Delta v$) plane, and their construction-parameter ranges. The central discovery is the structure of this solution space: all twelve families are interior transfers (their apogees remain within a few Earth-Moon distances), the minimum-$\Delta v$ solution (3.319 km/s, in F7) exploits a high-altitude lunar flyby, and comparison with earlier four-body solutions [24] shows that the absence of solar gravity raises the Moon-insertion impulse, so zero-$\Delta v_f$ transfers do not appear in this model.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the chosen grid spacing and continuation steps are fine enough to separate the solution set into genuine pieces, so the twelve reported families are not just fragments of one larger connected set of transfers; the paper itself notes that families with the same number of Earth revolutions could belong to a single family.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Mission designers can use Table 4 as a reference: F1 and F2 give fast transfers (4-16 days) at higher fuel cost, while F4 and F6-F12 give lower fuel consumption at 67-112 days.
  • The minimum-$\Delta v$ trajectory in F7 (3.319 km/s total) demonstrates that a high-altitude lunar flyby is the mechanism that lowers insertion impulse in this model.
  • The absence of any exterior or zero-insertion-impulse transfer in the PCR3BP solution space indicates that solar gravity is required to obtain single-impulse DPO transfers.
  • The 5,663,373-solution database provides a comprehensive baseline against which higher-fidelity four-body or ephemeris models can be compared.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same grid-search-plus-continuation pipeline were applied to other resonant DPOs (2:1, 3:1), analogous family catalogs might emerge, giving a broader classification of lunar distant-orbit transfers.
  • The paper's own caveat that families with equal revolution numbers may be connected suggests the true solution space could be organized into a few continuous manifolds indexed by revolution number, with the twelve labels as a coarse partition.
  • The linear predictor derived here is not specific to the DPO target; it could be reused to map transfer families to other prescribed orbits in the PCR3BP, such as distant retrograde orbits or low lunar orbits.
  • The reported $\Delta v$ ranges are PCR3BP values; a higher-fidelity ephemeris or four-body model would likely shift them, so the catalog should be treated as a first-cut mission-design reference.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper constructs bi-impulsive transfers from a 167 km circular low Earth orbit to a 1:1 distant prograde orbit around the Moon in the planar Earth-Moon circular restricted three-body problem. The transfers are parameterized by the DPO phase, velocity ratio, and time of flight; backward propagation generates initial guesses, which are corrected to satisfy the LEO radius and tangentiality constraints. A linear predictor derived from the variational equations is used in a predictor-corrector continuation to extend the solution set. The authors report 5,663,373 solutions and identify twelve transfer families, with total Δv from 3.319 to 3.758 km/s and TOF from 4 to 112 days (Table 4). They compare their minimum-Δv solution with prior PBCR4BP solutions and attribute the differences to the absence of solar gravity perturbation.

Significance. If the family identification is robust, this is a useful global map of the LEO-to-DPO transfer solution space and a practical catalog for mission designers. The numerical pipeline is carefully executed: the integrator tolerance is 1e-13, the constraint residual threshold is 5e-8, no fitted parameters are used to define the families, and the linear predictor follows from the variational equations rather than from the target data. The explicit comparison with Mingotti et al. is also a strength. The main caveat is that the twelve-family taxonomy is manually extracted and the paper itself concedes that same-revolution families may be connected, so the central claim of twelve distinct families is not yet fully established.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.1, §4.2, Table 4] The central claim that there are twelve distinct transfer families is based on manual extraction, and the text explicitly concedes in §4.2 that families with the same revolution number may belong to the same family and that the bridge between them has not been found. Since F6, F7, F8, and F9 all have eight revolutions, and F11 and F12 both have eleven revolutions, the family count and the per-family Δv, Δv_i, Δv_f, and TOF ranges in Table 4 are not established as distinct unless the solution components are shown to be separated. Please provide quantitative evidence of separation, for example by analyzing connected components in the (τ_f, β_f, TOF) parameter space with finer grid/continuation steps, or explicitly restate the claim as 'twelve branches observed under the current grid and continuation resolution' and temper the corresponding novelty statements.
  2. [§4.2, Fig. 8] The scatter in the (TOF, Δv_i) distribution of family F2 is attributed to the constraints ψ_i not being satisfied rigorously, but the acceptance criterion in §3.2.1 is ||ψ_i|| < 5e-8. This explanation is inconsistent with the stated tolerance unless the scatter is within the numerical error implied by that threshold. The paper should quantify how the 5e-8 constraint residual translates into uncertainty in Δv_i and determine whether the observed scatter exceeds that uncertainty. Since the Δv_i ranges in Table 4 are presented as guidance for launch-vehicle selection, this issue is load-bearing for the practical conclusions drawn from the family analysis.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Highlights] The phrase 'Gird search' should read 'Grid search'.
  2. [Eq. (17)] In the expression for A23, the terms involving (v_i + x_i + μ) and (∂v_i/∂TOF + ∂x_i/∂TOF) should contain ∂y_i/∂TOF and ∂v_i/∂TOF; as printed they repeat ∂y_i/∂β_f.
  3. [Eq. (30)] The identity matrix in the state transition matrix initial condition should be 4×4 to match the four-dimensional state vector, not 6×6.
  4. [§1, §4.2] There are several typographical errors, including 'thethe', 'preform', and other repeated or misspelled words; a careful proofreading pass is needed.
  5. [§4.1, Fig. 6] The explanation of the blank region in the (TOF, Δv) map is vague; please specify the Δv < 3.45 km/s continuation threshold and clarify whether the blank region is a search artifact or an actual absence of solutions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the solution-space search and continuation construction are self-contained; the family over-splitting caveat is a validity limitation, not a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's central output is a numerically generated set of transfer solutions and their manual organization into families. The construction chain in Sections 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 does not fit any parameter to the claimed families or to the comparison benchmark: initial guesses are generated by backward propagation from the chosen 1:1 DPO with grid parameters tau_f, beta_f, and TOF; correction uses fsolve on the LEO constraints psi_i; and the continuation predictor is the null space of the constraint Jacobian A obtained from the state transition matrix (Eqs. 14-33). The resulting solution set is checked directly against the dynamics, and no predicted quantity is constructed from the family labels. The 12 families are manually extracted from the (TOF, Delta-v) map, so the family count is a classification of the data rather than a derived prediction; the paper explicitly concedes that same-revolution families F6-F9 and F11-F12 may ultimately merge, which is a completeness or over-splitting risk, not circularity. Comparisons with Mingotti et al. are external benchmarks, and the cited self-works [33, 34, 36, 42, 43] provide methods, constants, or contextual criteria but are not used to define the target families or to force the reported ranges. No derivation step reduces to its own input, so the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a numerical survey, not a fitted law. The main free choices are the target orbit, LEO altitude, and search/continuation settings; none are fit to external data. The dominant assumptions are the planar PCR3BP model and tangential-impulse constraints, both stated explicitly. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • LEO altitude h_i = 167 km
    Chosen to match Mingotti et al. [24] for comparison; all transfer families depend on this departure orbit.
  • Target 1:1 DPO initial state = x0=1.007819412874657 LU, v0=1.082615000979063 LU/TU
    Selected following Ref. [24]; the specific target orbit affects which families exist.
  • Search domain bounds = tau_f in [0,2pi] step pi/5000, beta_f in [1,2] step 0.0001, TOF <= 12pi TU
    Ad hoc computational grid; solutions outside this window are not found, so completeness is relative to these bounds.
  • Continuation seed threshold = Delta_v < 3.45 km/s
    Only solutions below this impulse are continued; high-Delta_v families may be missing, as noted in Section 4.1.
  • Continuation step size Delta_s = 1e-5
    Chosen for the predictor-corrector; may affect whether bridges between families are found.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The planar Earth-Moon PCR3BP with circular Earth-Moon orbit is an adequate dynamical model for LEO-DPO transfer construction.
    Invoked throughout Section 2.1; neglects solar gravity and Moon's orbital eccentricity, which Section 4.3 shows affects the viability of zero-insertion-burn transfers.
  • domain assumption Tangential impulses at LEO departure and DPO insertion are assumed.
    Encoded in constraints Eq. (6) and Eq. (7); non-tangential burns could change the solution space.
  • standard math The state transition matrix from variational equations accurately represents sensitivity of the backward-propagated state.
    Used in Eqs. (18)-(30) for the linear predictor; this is standard astrodynamics.
  • ad hoc to paper Manual extraction of twelve families from the solution set is a valid clustering.
    Section 4.1 states the families are 'manually extracted'; no automated criterion is given, and same-revolution-number families may be connected.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Families of Transfers from circular low Earth orbit to Distant Prograde Orbit around the Moon." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RFE6ELRS

@misc{pith2026250801769,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Families of Transfers from circular low Earth orbit to Distant Prograde Orbit around the Moon},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RFE6ELRS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.01769}
}
read the original abstract

Distant prograde orbits around the Moon exhibit remarkable potential for practical applications such as cislunar surveillance activities and low-energy transfers due to their instability. Previous works on transfers from circular low Earth orbit to distant prograde orbits mainly focused on construction methods based on dynamical structures, lacking a comprehensive analysis of the solution space of this transfer scenario. This paper investigates the solution space and identifies families of transfers from a 167 km circular low Earth orbit to a 1:1 distant prograde orbit. In particular, grid search and trajectory continuation are performed to construct these transfer trajectories. Initial guesses of the transfers are selected in the 1:1 distant prograde orbit through a backward propagation strategy and are then corrected to satisfy specified constraints. Based on the obtained solutions, a linear predictor is derived to predict more feasible solutions and a predictor-corrector continuation method is used to extend the solution space. Twelve transfer families are identified, most of which are new or previously underexplored. The distributions of construction parameters and transfer characteristics of these twelve families are analyzed and discussed, showing which families are applicable to which types of specific practical missions. Comparison between the obtained solution and solution developed by previous works is further performed to imply the effects of the selection of dynamical model on transfer construction.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    AAS 20-649, 2020

    A.L.Batcha,J.Williams,T.F.Dawn,J.P.Gutkowski,M.V.Widner,S.L.Smallwood,B.J.Killeen,E.C.Williams,R.E.Harpold,Artemis i trajectory design and optimization, in: 2020 AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, no. AAS 20-649, 2020

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Zheng, Y

    Y. Zheng, Y. Mengfei, D. Xiangjin, J. Shengyi, P. Jing, S. Yan, G. Zheng, C. Liping, P. Yong, N. Zhang, Analysis of chang’e-5 lunar core drilling process, Chin. J. Aeronaut. 36 (2) (2023) 292–303.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2022.01.023

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cja.2022.01.023 2023

  3. [3]

    A. A. Shetty, H. Kumar, R. Regulavalasa, A. Kamboj, K. Prakasha, R. P. HM, G. Sharma, A. K. Gupta, A. Kumar, et al., Rover ramp deployment system for chandrayaan-3: Concept, design, development and operations, Acta Astronaut. 229 (2025) 1–12.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.12.014

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.12.014 2025

  4. [4]

    213 (2023) 336–343.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.09.021

    Y.-J.Song,J.Bang,J.Bae,S.Hong,Lunarorbitacquisitionofthekoreapathfinderlunarorbiter:designreferencevsactualflightresults,Acta Astronaut. 213 (2023) 336–343.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.09.021

    doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.09.021 2023

  5. [5]

    Y. Qi, S. Xu, Minimum𝛿v for the transfer to permanent lunar orbits with hyperbolic approach, Acta Astronaut. 119 (2016) 183–195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2015.11.016

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2015.11.016 2016

  6. [6]

    doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2016.06.008

    Y.Qi,S.Xu,Earth-moontransferwithnear-optimallunarcaptureintherestrictedfour-bodyproblem,Aerosp.Sci.Technol.55(2016)282–291. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2016.06.008

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ast.2016.06.008 2016

  7. [7]

    doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/4.861543

    R.H.Battin,Anintroductiontothemathematicsandmethodsofastrodynamics,AIAA,1999. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/4.861543

    doi:10.2514/4.861543 1999

  8. [8]

    Yagasaki, Computation of low energy earth-to-moon transfers with moderate flight time, Physica D 197 (3-4) (2004) 313–331.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2004.07.005

    K. Yagasaki, Computation of low energy earth-to-moon transfers with moderate flight time, Physica D 197 (3-4) (2004) 313–331.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2004.07.005

    doi:10.1016/j.physd.2004.07.005 2004

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-004-0406-8

    K.Yagasaki,Sun-perturbedearth-to-moontransferswithlowenergyandmoderateflighttime,Celest.Mech.Dyn.Astron.90(2004)197–212. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-004-0406-8

    2004 doi

  2. [10]

    Topputo, On optimal two-impulse earth-moon transfers in a four-body model, Celest

    F. Topputo, On optimal two-impulse earth-moon transfers in a four-body model, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 117 (2013) 279–313.doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-013-9513-8

    2013 doi

  3. [11]

    Oshima, F

    K. Oshima, F. Topputo, S. Campagnola, T. Yanao, Analysis of medium-energy transfers to the moon, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 127 (2017) 285–300. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-016-9727-7

    2017 doi

  4. [12]

    Oshima, F

    K. Oshima, F. Topputo, T. Yanao, Low-energy transfers to the moon with long transfer time, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 131 (2019) 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-019-9883-7

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    E. A. Belbruno, J. K. Miller, Sun-perturbed earth-to-moon transfers with ballistic capture, J. Guid. Control Dyn. 16 (4) (1993) 770–775. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21079

    1993 doi

  6. [14]

    doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2025.03.010

    C.T.Campana,F.Topputo,Ephemerisrefinementoflow-energyearth–moontransfersviaanastrodynamicmodelchain,ActaAstronaut.232 (2025) 271–282. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2025.03.010

    2025 doi

  7. [15]

    Short,K.C

    C.R. Short,K.C. Howell,Lagrangiancoherentstructures invariousmap representationsforapplication tomulti-bodygravitational regimes, Acta Astronaut. 94 (2) (2014) 592–607.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.08.020

    2014 doi

  8. [16]

    J. S. Parker, R. L. Anderson, Low-energy lunar trajectory design, Vol. 12, John Wiley & Sons, 2014

    2014

  9. [17]

    Oshima, A graph-based framework of low-energy transfer design, Acta Astronaut

    K. Oshima, A graph-based framework of low-energy transfer design, Acta Astronaut. 229 (2025) 644–661.doi:https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.actaastro.2025.01.050. Shuyue Fu et al.: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 19 of 21 Families of LEO-DPO T ransfers

    2025

  10. [18]

    Zhang, X

    Z. Zhang, X. Hou, Transfer orbits to the earth-moon triangular libration points, Adv. Space Res. 55 (2015) 2899–2913.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.03.008

    2015 doi

  11. [19]

    M. Tan, K. Zhang, J. Wang, Single impulsive transfer to the earth–moon triangular point l4 in a bicircular model, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 82 (2020) 105074.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2019.105074

    2020

  12. [20]

    doi:https: //doi.org/10.2514/1.24960

    J.Demeyer,P.Gurfil,Transfertodistantretrogradeorbitsusingmanifoldtheory,J.Guid.ControlDyn.30(5)(2007)1261–1267. doi:https: //doi.org/10.2514/1.24960

    2007 doi

  13. [21]

    L. R. Capdevila, K. C. Howell, A transfer network linking earth, moon, and the triangular libration point regions in the earth-moon system, Adv. Space Res. 62 (7) (2018) 1826–1852.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.06.045

    2018 doi

  14. [22]

    Zhang, Y

    R. Zhang, Y. Wang, C. Zhang, H. Zhang, The transfers from lunar dros to earth orbits via optimization in the four body problem, Astrophys. Space Sci. 366 (6) (2021) 49.doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-021-03955-1

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    W. Ming, C. Zhang, H. Zhang, Mechanism analysis of the dro low-energy transfer problem: An energy perspective, Astrodynamics 9 (2025) 165–193. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s42064-024-0215-7

    2025 doi

  16. [24]

    79 (2012) 20–32.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.04.022

    G.Mingotti,F.Topputo,F.Bernelli-Zazzera,Transferstodistantperiodicorbitsaroundthemoonviatheirinvariantmanifolds,ActaAstronaut. 79 (2012) 20–32.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.04.022

    2012 doi

  17. [25]

    Hénon, Numerical exploration of the restricted problem, v, Astron

    M. Hénon, Numerical exploration of the restricted problem, v, Astron. Astrophys. 1 (1969) 223–238

    1969

  18. [26]

    doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2010.04.003

    J.S.Parker,K.E.Davis,G.H.Born,Chainingperiodicthree-bodyorbitsintheearth–moonsystem,ActaAstronaut.67(5-6)(2010)623–638. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2010.04.003

    2010 doi

  19. [27]

    Gupta, K

    M. Gupta, K. C. Howell, C. Frueh, Earth-moon multi-body orbits to facilitate cislunar surveillance activities, in: AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, 2021, pp. 17–18

    2021

  20. [28]

    Szebehely, Theory of orbit: The restricted problem of three Bodies, Academic, 1967

    V. Szebehely, Theory of orbit: The restricted problem of three Bodies, Academic, 1967

    1967

  21. [29]

    Dutt, A review of low-energy transfers, Astrophys

    P. Dutt, A review of low-energy transfers, Astrophys. Space Sci. 363 (12) (2018) 253. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10509-018-3461-4

    2018

  22. [30]

    Space Res

    S.T.ScheuerleJr,K.C.Howell,D.C.Davis,Energy-informedpathways:Afundamentalapproachtodesigningballisticlunartransfers,Adv. Space Res. 75 (1) (2025) 1096–1117.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.07.035

    2025 doi

  23. [31]

    W. S. Koon, M. W. Lo, J. E. Marsden, S. D. Ross, Low energy transfer to the moon, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 81 (1-2) (2001) 63–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013359120468

    2001 doi

  24. [32]

    Onozaki, H

    K. Onozaki, H. Yoshimura, S. D. Ross, Tube dynamics and low energy earth–moon transfers in the 4-body system, Adv. Space Res. 60 (10) (2017) 2117–2132. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.07.046

    2017 doi

  25. [33]

    S. Fu, Y. Liang, D. Wu, S. Gong, Low-energy earth-moon transfers with lunar ballistic capture based on lagrangian coherent structures in a four-body model, Adv. Space Res. 75 (6) (2025) 4993–5013.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.12.072

    2025 doi

  26. [34]

    S. Fu, D. Wu, P. Shi, S. Gong, Four-body transit-orbit classification combining lagrangian coherent structures with data mining, J. Guid. Control Dyn. (2025) 1–20doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G008681

    2025 doi

  27. [35]

    B. P. McCarthy, K. C. Howell, Leveraging quasi-periodic orbits for trajectory design in cislunar space, Astrodynamics 5 (2) (2021) 139–165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s42064-020-0094-5

    2021 doi

  28. [36]

    S. Fu, S. Gong, Escape criterion for restricted three-body problem, Adv. Space Res. (2025).doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr. 2025.02.017

    2025 doi

  29. [37]

    Oshima, Capture and escape analyses on planar retrograde periodic orbit around the earth, Adv

    K. Oshima, Capture and escape analyses on planar retrograde periodic orbit around the earth, Adv. Space Res. 68 (9) (2021) 3891–3902. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.07.012

    2021 doi

  30. [38]

    Control Dyn

    D.A.DeiTos,R.P.Russell,F.Topputo,Surveyofmarsballisticcapturetrajectoriesusingperiodicorbitsasgeneratingmechanisms,J.Guid. Control Dyn. 41 (6) (2018) 1227–1242.doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003158

    2018 doi

  31. [39]

    C. Du, O. L. Starinova, Y. Liu, Transfer between the planar lyapunov orbits around the earth-moon l2 point using low-thrust engine, Acta Astronaut. 201 (2022) 513–525.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.09.056

    2022 doi

  32. [40]

    C. Du, K. Wu, O. L. Starinova, Y. Liu, Two trajectory configurations for the low-thrust transfer between northern and southern halo orbits in the earth-moon system, Adv. Space Res. 72 (10) (2023) 4093–4105.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2023.08.007

    2023 doi

  33. [41]

    Y. Jiao, B. Cheng, Y. Huang, E. Asphaug, B. Gladman, R. Malhotra, P. Michel, Y. Yu, H. Baoyin, Asteroid kamo ‘oalewa’s journey from the lunar giordano bruno crater to earth 1: 1 resonance, Nat. Astron. 8 (7) (2024) 819–826.doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41550-024-02258-z

    2024

  34. [42]

    S. Fu, D. Wu, X. Liu, P. Shi, S. Gong, Constructing four-body ballistic lunar transfers via analytical energy conditions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.16804 (2025).doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.16804

    2025 doi

  35. [43]

    S. Fu, D. Wu, S. Gong, Analytical nonlinear predictor for trajectory continuation in multibody models, J. Guid. Control Dyn. 48 (6) (2025) 1418–1427. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G008863

    2025 doi

  36. [44]

    S. K. Singh, E. Taheri, R. Woollands, J. Junkins, Mission design for close-range lunar mapping by quasi-frozen orbits, in: 70th International Astronautical Congress, Washington DC, USA, 2019, pp. 1–11

    2019

  37. [45]

    Pushparaj, N

    N. Pushparaj, N. Baresi, Y. Kawakatsu, Transfers and orbital maintenance of spatial retrograde orbits for phobos exploration, Acta Astronaut. 189 (2021) 452–464.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.09.008

    2021 doi

  38. [46]

    S. K. Singh, B. D. Anderson, E. Taheri, J. L. Junkins, Exploiting manifolds of l1 halo orbits for end-to-end earth-moon low-thrust trajectory design, Acta Astronaut. 183 (2021) 255–272.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.03.017

    2021 doi

  39. [47]

    Pushparaj, N

    N. Pushparaj, N. Baresi, Y. Kawakatsu, Optimization of mmx relative quasi-satellite transfer trajectories using primer vector theory, Acta Astronaut. 225 (2024) 390–401.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.09.031

    2024 doi

  40. [48]

    G.Mingotti,F.Topputo,F.Bernelli-Zazzera,Efficientinvariant-manifold,low-thrustplanartrajectoriestothemoon,Commun.NonlinearSci. Numer. Simul. 17 (2) (2012) 817–831.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2011.06.033

    2012 doi

  41. [49]

    Mengali, A

    G. Mengali, A. A. Quarta, Optimization of biimpulsive trajectories in the earth-moon restricted three-body system, J. Guid. Control Dyn. 28 (2) (2005) 209–216.doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.7702. Shuyue Fu et al.: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 20 of 21 Families of LEO-DPO...

    2005 doi

  42. [50]

    Pinelli, Neural network applications to bi-impulsive earth-moon transfers in a four-body model, Master’s thesis, Politecnico di Milano (2023)

    A. Pinelli, Neural network applications to bi-impulsive earth-moon transfers in a four-body model, Master’s thesis, Politecnico di Milano (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    Zheng, L

    T. Zheng, L. Cheng, S. Gong, X. Huang, Model incremental learning of flight dynamics enhanced by sample management, Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 160 (2025) 110049.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2025.110049

    2025

  44. [52]

    C. Qu, L. Cheng, S. Gong, X. Huang, Experience replay enhances excitation condition of neural-network adaptive control learning, J. Guid. Control Dyn. 48 (3) (2025) 496–507.doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G008162. CRediT authorship contribution statement Shuyue Fu:Datacuration,F...

    2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.