Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 2 cited by

Uni-Layout: Integrating Human Feedback in Unified Layout Generation and Evaluation

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Scaling a monolayer Pt–WSe2–Pt transistor from 12 nm to 3 nm shifts transport from thermionic emission to quantum tunneling, and at 3 nm the subthreshold swing drops below the 60 mV/dec Boltzmann limit at room temperature.

desk verdict Provenance mismatch aside, this is a device-physics paper with a coherent Landauer-to-Richardson reduction, but its sub-Boltzmann claim rests on an unverified gate model and the text contradicts itself on Top. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.02374 v1 pith:QABOAUZT submitted 2025-08-04 cs.CV cs.IRcs.LG

Shuo Lu , Yanyin Chen , Wei Feng , Jiahao Fan , Fengheng Li , Zheng Zhang , Jingjing Lv , Junjie Shen
show 2 more authors
Ching Law Jian Liang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVcs.IRcs.LG PACS 73.40.Qv73.63.-b85.30.Tv
keywords 2DTMDFETsquantumtunnelingthermionicemissionsubthresholdswingBoltzmanntyrannyLandauerformulaNEGF-DFTchannelscaling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish how the transport mechanism in two-dimensional transition-metal-dichalcogenide transistors changes as the channel is scaled from 12 nm down to 3 nm, and what that means for device performance. It argues that the quantum-mechanical Landauer current asymptotically reduces to classical thermionic emission in the long-channel, high-temperature limit, and uses a competition parameter to draw the boundary between the two regimes. The central result is that a 3 nm Pt–WSe2–Pt device stays tunneling-dominated up to 500 K and achieves a subthreshold swing below the classical 60 mV/dec Boltzmann limit at room temperature, while channels around 10 nm represent the best compromise between leakage and gate control. If correct, these results give concrete guidance for choosing operating temperature and gate-voltage windows in sub-10 nm 2D FETs.

What carries the argument

The central objects are the transmission coefficient τ(E) obtained from NEGF-DFT calculations, the Landauer–Büttiker formula for gate-modulated current, and an effective gate model in which the applied voltage shifts the chemical potential linearly with coefficients αin = 0.83 inside the band gap and αout = 0.33 outside it. From the Landauer current, the paper separates the tunneling contribution IQM (energies inside the band gap) from the thermionic contribution ISC (energies above the conduction minimum or below the valence maximum) and defines the competition parameter ζ. Two characteristic temperatures, Top (where OFF current is minimal) and Tc (where thermionic emission takes over), quantify the crossover and define the operating window for each channel length.

What would settle it

Measure the transfer characteristic (drain current versus gate voltage) of a 3 nm channel monolayer Pt–WSe2–Pt FET at 300 K with a thin EOT gate dielectric: if the subthreshold swing stays above about 60 mV/dec, or if the effective chemical-potential shift deviates significantly from 0.83 eV per volt of gate bias, then the tunneling-dominated beyond-Boltzmann claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that for monolayer Pt–WSe2–Pt FETs the OFF current and subthreshold swing are governed by two competing mechanisms: quantum tunneling, which is temperature-insensitive and grows exponentially as the channel shortens, and semiclassical thermionic emission, which is length-insensitive and follows Richardson's law. Using transmission coefficients computed from NEGF-DFT and a Landauer formula with an effective gate model, the authors define a competition parameter ζ = (ISC − IQM)/(ISC + IQM) that cleanly separates the regimes. They find that for Lch < 9 nm the OFF current is tunneling-dominated with an optimal temperature Top below 300 K, whereas for Lch ≥ 9 nm thermionic emission dominates and the subthreshold swing approaches the Boltzmann tyranny divided by the gate-control efficiency αin. The 3 nm device remains tunneling-dominated up to 500 K and its subthreshold swing falls below Boltzmann tyranny because the steep slope of the transmission function τ(E) steepens the log-current versus gate-voltage curve.

Load-bearing premise

Every gate-dependent prediction assumes a fixed linear relation between applied gate voltage and chemical-potential shift (83% inside the band gap, 33% outside), parameters taken from prior work and applied unchanged to all channel lengths from 3 to 12 nm.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Sub-10 nm 2D FETs can switch below the 60 mV/dec Boltzmann limit when transport is ballistic and tunneling-dominated, at least for a 3 nm Pt–WSe2–Pt channel at room temperature.
  • A channel length near 10 nm offers the best trade-off between leakage current and gate control for 2D FETs, because longer channels lose some gate efficiency while shorter channels leak more.
  • The two characteristic temperatures Top and Tc give device designers concrete criteria for selecting operating temperature and gate-voltage windows when scaling 2D FETs.
  • In the thermionic regime the normalized subthreshold swing SS/αin approaches the fundamental Boltzmann limit, implying that thinner gate dielectrics and better gate control directly improve the subthreshold swing.
  • The quantum-to-classical crossover picture should generalize to other TMD channel materials, with barrier height and chemical-potential alignment shifting the quantitative predictions but not the qualitative behavior.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The steep-τ(E) mechanism that produces sub-Boltzmann switching at 3 nm suggests that engineering the transmission edge—through spacer layers, band alignment, or dielectric screening—might extend the sub-60 mV/dec benefit to longer channels or higher temperatures.
  • The competition parameter ζ could serve as a practical design metric for other sub-10 nm devices, including tunnel FETs, because it directly quantifies how much of the current is quantum versus thermionic at a given temperature and gate voltage.
  • Because the authors keep the gate voltage below 1.5 V and note that screening, interface-state filling, and gate-leakage effects are not substantially probed, an experimental test at higher gate bias would clarify the validity range of the effective gate model.
  • A low-temperature transport experiment that separates temperature-insensitive tunneling from Arrhenius-type thermionic emission could directly verify the predicted Top and Tc for each channel length.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies monolayer Pt-WSe2-Pt field-effect transistors with channel lengths from 3 to 12 nm, combining NEGF-DFT transmission functions with an effective gate model. It derives an asymptotic equivalence between the Landauer formula and Richardson's law in the classical limit, introduces a competition parameter zeta to separate quantum tunneling from thermionic emission, and computes the subthreshold swing, OFF current, and two characteristic temperatures Top and Tc. The paper claims that the 3 nm device remains tunneling-dominated up to 500 K and achieves a sub-Boltzmann subthreshold swing, while Lch near 10 nm is identified as the optimal channel length.

Significance. If the device-level predictions are correct, the paper offers a concrete route to sub-60 mV/dec switching in 2D FETs and a useful scaling criterion near Lch = 10 nm. The first-principles NEGF-DFT transmission calculations and the explicit analytic connection between the Landauer formula and Richardson's law are valuable contributions, and the zeta parameter is a crisp diagnostic for the tunneling-to-thermionic crossover. However, the quantitative device predictions rest on an effective gate model whose parameters are imported from a prior self-cited study without re-verification, and the manuscript contains an internal contradiction about Top that must be resolved before the central claim is reliable.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract; Section III (Fig. 7(b)); Section IV] The threshold behavior of Top is stated inconsistently. The Abstract and the Conclusion state 'For Lch < 9 nm, Top < 300 K', while Section III, in the paragraph discussing Fig. 7(b), states 'short-channel FETs (Lch < 9 nm) exhibit Top > 300 K'. Since Top defines the tunneling-dominated versus thermionic-dominated regimes and supports the optimal-length claim, this is a load-bearing inconsistency. Please correct the sign and ensure the abstract, results, and conclusion all agree.
  2. [Section II.C; Section III] The effective gate model in Section II.C adopts alpha_in = 0.83 and alpha_out = 0.33 from Ref. [22], which treats a Pt-WSe2-Pt junction with an h-AlN monolayer spacer, and applies them unchanged to the present direct Pt-WSe2-Pt junctions at all channel lengths. All Vg-dependent quantities (SS, JOFF, Top, Tc) are computed from this linear shift, and the sub-Boltzmann claim for the 3 nm device depends on the resulting position of mu(Vg) in the transmission gap. The manuscript itself notes in Section III that low gate voltages 'may be insufficient to generate substantial effects on charge screening, interface state filling, and gate leakage.' Because short-channel electrostatics make the rigid shift least reliable at 3 nm, please either (i) perform self-consistent NEGF-DFT gate sweeps for at least the 3 nm device, or (ii) provide a sensitivity analysis showing the results are robust to variations in alpha_in and alpha_out within a physically plausible range.
  3. [Section II.E, Eq. (16)] The closed-form expression for SS in Eq. (16) is missing a numerical factor. Direct differentiation of the Landauer current with respect to Vg gives dI/dVg proportional to (1/(4kBT)) times an integral over [sech^2((E-mu_L)/(2kBT)) - sech^2((E-mu_R)/(2kBT))] tau(E), so the overall prefactor in Eq. (16) should be 4 ln(10) kBT/e rather than ln(10) kBT/e. With the printed factor, the thermionic limit of Eq. (16) becomes SS -> BT/(4 alpha_in), but the correct limit is BT/alpha_in, and the values reported in Fig. 4(c) (SS approximately 72.6 mV/dec) are consistent with BT/alpha_in. Please correct Eq. (16) and confirm that the numerical implementation uses the corrected expression.
  4. [Section II.D] The correspondence-principle derivation is carried out for a parabolic single-band model with a sharp affinity step, not for the actual DFT transmission function tau(E) shown in Fig. 1(b). The statement that 'the Landauer formula asymptotically converges to Richardson's law' is therefore proven for an idealized model rather than for the computed junctions. Please either soften the universality claim or demonstrate the asymptotic behavior on the actual tau(E), for example by checking the slope of log10(J/T) versus 1/T for the 12 nm device in the classical regime.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figure 3 caption] The caption states 'the tunneling-dominated triangular region ultimately vanishes at temperatures exceeding approximately 250, 325, and 500 K for the 12, 9, and 12 nm FETs', listing 12 nm twice and omitting the 6 nm device; the intended sequence is likely 12, 9, and 6 nm.
  2. [Section III, text near Eq. (14)] The slope of the Richardson plot is given as m = (log10 e)/kB W, but the standard expression is negative, m = -(log10 e) W/kB, when plotting log10(J/T) versus 1/T; please include the minus sign or define the axes consistently.
  3. [Figure 7 caption] The caption for Fig. 7 states 'Vds = 50 V', but the text and all other figures use Vds = 50 mV; this is a typo.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

No fitted-input-as-prediction: the 3-nm sub-Boltzmann swing claim follows from the paper's own NEGF-DFT transmission tau(E) and the Landauer integrals, so the central result is not an input restatement. Minor circularity remains: the long-channel prediction SS ~ 72.6 mV/dec is exactly BT/alpha_in with the same-group gate-model input alpha_in = 0.83 (Eqs.

  1. self definitional [Section II.C, Eqs. (16)-(18); long-channel SS claims in Section III (Fig. 4(c) and Fig. 7 discussion)]
    "the subthreshold swing can be expressed as SS(T,Vg,Vds) = [ln(10)(kBT/e)].[dV_G^eff(Vg)/dVg]^{-1}.(...) (Eq. 16); ... dV_G^eff(Vg)/dVg = { alpha_in, for mu in (EV,EC); alpha_out otherwise } (Eq. 17); ... SS -> ln(10)(kBT/e)/alpha_in (Eq. 18). ... 'The nearly flat region yields a subthreshold swing of approximately SS ~ 72.6 mV dec^-1, which is accurately represented by the equation SS = alpha_in[ln(10)kBT/e].' 'For Lch >= 9 nm, Top > 300 K and JOFF is thermionic-dominated, and the subthreshold swing approaches (Boltzmann tyranny /alpha_in).'"

    The claimed long-channel result is an algebraic identity of the adopted model: with dV_G^eff/dVg identically alpha_in inside the gap (Eq. 17), the thermionic-limit formula (Eq. 18) equals ln(10)kBT/(e alpha_in), and at 300 K this is 59.23/0.83 ~ 71.4 ~ the reported 72.6 mV/dec. The number therefore carries no information beyond the input alpha_in = 0.83, and alpha_in itself is imported unchanged from the same group's prior Ref. [22], which was computed for a Pt-WSe2-Pt device containing an inserted h-AlN spacer, not for the present direct-contact junctions at Lch = 3-12 nm.

  2. renaming known result [Section II.C, Eqs. (5)-(7)]
    "Similar to the quantum-semiclassical competing parameter xi defined in Ref. [36], the total current I(T,Vg,Vds) at finite bias can also be decomposed into a quantum-tunneling contribution IQM and a semiclassical thermionic emission contribution ISC ... From Eqs. (5) and (6), we define a quantum-semiclassical competition parameter [36], zeta(T,Vg,Vds) = (ISC - IQM)/(ISC + IQM)."

    zeta is introduced as 'Similar to' the parameter xi of Ref. [36] - the same corresponding author's prior work - and is built from the identical decomposition of the total current into IQM (integral over the band gap, EV to EC) and ISC (integrals over the band edges). The new symbol largely renames the prior diagnostic rather than introducing an independent criterion. The step is minor because zeta is explicitly credited and is used only to color-code and label transport regimes in Figs. 2 and 3; the quantitative results (SS, JOFF, Top, Tc) are computed directly from the Landauer integrals and do not pass through zeta.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained at its core: tau(E) is computed in this paper with NEGF-DFT (Sec. II.B), the gate-modulated currents are evaluated with the Landauer formula (Eqs. 1-4), and the Richardson-law limit is derived in-paper (Eqs. 8-14) rather than assumed. The headline 3-nm result - alpha_in(SS/BT) ~ 0.617, i.e., sub-Boltzmann swing persisting to 500 K - depends on the steepness of the computed tau(E) near the gap edges, not on any fitted constant, so it does not reduce to an input. Two genuine but minor circular-adjacent steps are identified. First, the long-channel claim 'the subthreshold swing approaches (Boltzmann tyranny/alpha_in)' is just the model's own gate-efficiency definition (Eq. 17 into Eq. 18) restated: at 300 K, BT/alpha_in = 71.4 mV/dec, numerically the reported 72.6 mV/dec, so that prediction carries no information beyond the adopted alpha_in = 0.83. Second, zeta is a credited near-rename of xi from the authors' own Ref. [36], used only as a regime diagnostic. The gate-model alphas are load-bearing for every Vg-dependent quantity and are taken unchanged from the same group's Ref. [22] (a device with an h-AlN spacer) without re-derivation for the present direct-contact junctions; this is an unvalidated model transfer and a correctness risk, but not a circular fit, because those values are published first-principles results and are not fitted to the present targets. Non-circularity correctness flags the reviewer should weigh: (a) the paper contradicts itself on whether Top is below or above 300 K for Lch < 9 nm (Abstract and Conclusion say Top < 300 K; Section III states the opposite); (b) the Fig. 6 caption prints minimum SS/BT values (1.19, 1.20, 1.15, 0.62) that disagree with the text's assignment of 0.617 alpha_in BT to the 3-nm device; (c) Eq. 16 as printed has a prefactor a factor of 4 too small to be consistent with Eqs. (15) and (18), although the reported values match Eq. 15; (d) the paper itself concedes its gate voltages 'may be insufficient to generate substantial effects on charge screening, interface state filling, and gate leakage.' None of these is circularity; they bear on reliability rather than on whether predictions reduce to inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results depend on two calibrated parameters from the authors' earlier papers (alpha_in, alpha_out), on the ballistic and effective-gate assumptions, and on the PBE/NEGF-DFT computational setup. No new physical entities are postulated; zeta, Top, and Tc are derived diagnostics rather than independent postulates.

free parameters (2)
  • alpha_in (gate-control efficiency inside band gap) = 0.83
    Taken from the authors' prior Ref. [22] effective gate model; controls the SS limit BT/alpha_in and all Vg-dependent results.
  • alpha_out (gate-control efficiency outside band gap) = 0.33
    Same source as alpha_in; controls the chemical potential shift when the chemical potential is outside the transmission gap.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Ballistic transport: channel length is shorter than the electron-phonon mean free path, so scattering is neglected.
    Stated in the Introduction; required for the Landauer formalism to apply without diffusive corrections.
  • ad hoc to paper Effective gate model with linear chemical potential shifts and fixed alpha_in/alpha_out.
    Invoked in Section II C; parameters from Ref. [22] are applied to all channel lengths without re-derivation.
  • domain assumption Parabolic single-band dispersion and free-electron continuum for the asymptotic Richardson derivation.
    Used in Section II D to evaluate tau(E) and obtain Eq. (12); not representative of the full NEGF-DFT transmission.
  • standard math Landauer formula and NEGF-DFT (Keldysh) provide the correct quantum transport description.
    Foundational framework in mesoscopic physics; standard for coherent ballistic transport.
  • domain assumption PBE-GGA exchange-correlation functional adequately describes Pt-WSe2-Pt junctions.
    DFT setup in Sections II A and II B; no benchmarking against experiment or hybrid functionals.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Uni-Layout: Integrating Human Feedback in Unified Layout Generation and Evaluation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QABOAUZT

@misc{pith2026250802374,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Uni-Layout: Integrating Human Feedback in Unified Layout Generation and Evaluation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QABOAUZT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.02374}
}
read the original abstract

Layout generation plays a crucial role in enhancing both user experience and design efficiency. However, current approaches suffer from task-specific generation capabilities and perceptually misaligned evaluation metrics, leading to limited applicability and ineffective measurement. In this paper, we propose \textit{Uni-Layout}, a novel framework that achieves unified generation, human-mimicking evaluation and alignment between the two. For universal generation, we incorporate various layout tasks into a single taxonomy and develop a unified generator that handles background or element contents constrained tasks via natural language prompts. To introduce human feedback for the effective evaluation of layouts, we build \textit{Layout-HF100k}, the first large-scale human feedback dataset with 100,000 expertly annotated layouts. Based on \textit{Layout-HF100k}, we introduce a human-mimicking evaluator that integrates visual and geometric information, employing a Chain-of-Thought mechanism to conduct qualitative assessments alongside a confidence estimation module to yield quantitative measurements. For better alignment between the generator and the evaluator, we integrate them into a cohesive system by adopting Dynamic-Margin Preference Optimization (DMPO), which dynamically adjusts margins based on preference strength to better align with human judgments. Extensive experiments show that \textit{Uni-Layout} significantly outperforms both task-specific and general-purpose methods. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/JD-GenX/Uni-Layout.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Lay2Story: Extending Diffusion Transformers for Layout-Togglable Story Generation

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Layout-Togglable storytelling is introduced: diffusion transformers conditioned on layout enable precise control over character position and appearance, supported by a new large-scale dataset and benchmark.

  2. Numerical Study of Oblique Detonation Initiation Assisted by Local Energy Deposition

    physics.flu-dyn 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Pulsatile local energy deposition can initiate sustainable oblique detonation on a finite wedge with less than 10% of the average power needed by continuous deposition.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [22]

    Jiang, L

    J. Jiang, L. Xu, L. Du, L. Li, G. Zhang, C. Qiu, and L.-M. Peng, Yttrium-doping-induced metallization of molybde- num disulfide for ohmic contacts in two-dimensional tran- sistors, Nature Electronics 7, 545 (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    Radosavljevic and J

    M. Radosavljevic and J. Kavalieros, Taking moore’s law to new heights: When transistors can’t get any smaller, the only direction is up, IEEE Spectrum 59, 32 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [2]

    R. W. Keyes, The impact of moore’s law, IEEE Solid-State Circuits Society Newsletter 11, 25 (2006)

    work page 2006

  4. [3]

    and ( 6). Figure 2(c) shows that at T = 300 K, transport is primarily governed by semiclas- sical thermionic emission: the integrand peaks at around E > E C for electrons and at around E < E V for holes. In contrast, at T = 100 K, transport is primarily gov- erned by quantum tunneling, as evidenced by a peak in the integrand at the chemical potentials ( µ...

    work page

  5. [4]

    Chen, Challenges for silicon technology scaling in the nanoscale era, in 2009 Proceedings of ESSCIRC (2009) pp

    T.-c. Chen, Challenges for silicon technology scaling in the nanoscale era, in 2009 Proceedings of ESSCIRC (2009) pp. 1–7

    work page 2009

  6. [5]

    and ( 6), we define a quantum- semiclassical competition parameter [ 36], ζ(T, Vg, Vds) ≡ ISC − IQM ISC + IQM , (7) where −1 ≤ ζ(T, Vg, Vds) ≤ 1. A positive ζ indicates that the total current comprises more semiclassical thermionic current, while a negative ζ indicates that the total cur- rent comprises more quantum tunneling current. D. Bohr’s Corresponde...

    work page

  7. [6]

    Ieong, B

    M. Ieong, B. Doris, J. Kedzierski, K. Rim, and M. Yang, Silicon device scaling to the sub-10-nm regime, Science 306, 2057 (2004) , https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1100731

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1100731 2004

  8. [7]

    Manzeli, D

    S. Manzeli, D. Ovchinnikov, D. Pasquier, O. V. Yazyev, and A. Kis, 2d transition metal dichalcogenides, Nature Reviews Materials 2, 17033 (2017)

    2017

Show all 47 references
  1. [8]

    Natelson, Towards the ultimate transistor, Physics World 22, 27 (2009)

    D. Natelson, Towards the ultimate transistor, Physics World 22, 27 (2009)

    2009

  2. [9]

    Duan and H

    X. Duan and H. Zhang, Introduction: Two- dimensional layered transition metal dichalcogenides, Chemical Reviews 124, 10619 (2024) , pMID: 39380397, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00586

    2024 doi

  3. [10]

    in the integral above, we obtain Jz = 2e h ∫ ∞ χ [ m 2πℏ2 (E − χ) ] e−(E−µ)/(kB T )dE = AT 2e− W kB T (12) where A = emk2 B 2π2ℏ 3 is the Richardson constant

    for τ (E)asymp. in the integral above, we obtain Jz = 2e h ∫ ∞ χ [ m 2πℏ2 (E − χ) ] e−(E−µ)/(kB T )dE = AT 2e− W kB T (12) where A = emk2 B 2π2ℏ 3 is the Richardson constant. The Lan- dauer formula in the quantum transport regime asymp- totically converges to the thermionic em...

  4. [11]

    Akinwande, C

    D. Akinwande, C. Huyghebaert, C.-H. Wang, M. I. Serna, S. Goossens, L.-J. Li, H.-S. P. Wong, and F. H. L. Kop- pens, Graphene and two-dimensional materials for silicon technology, Nature 573, 507 (2019)

    2019

  5. [12]

    H. K. Ng, D. Xiang, A. Suwardi, G. Hu, K. Yang, Y. Zhao, T. Liu, Z. Cao, H. Liu, S. Li, J. Cao, Q. Zhu, Z. Dong, C. K. I. Tan, D. Chi, C.-W. Qiu, K. Hippal- gaonkar, G. Eda, M. Yang, and J. Wu, Improving carrier mobility in two-dimensional semiconductors with rippled materials...

    2022

  6. [13]

    Lee, M.-K

    S. Lee, M.-K. Song, X. Zhang, J. M. Suh, J.- E. Ryu, and J. Kim, Mixed-dimensional integration of 3d-on-2d heterostructures for advanced electronics, Nano Letters 24, 9117 (2024)

    2024

  7. [14]

    Radisavljevic, A

    B. Radisavljevic, A. Radenovic, J. Brivio, V. Gi- acometti, and A. Kis, Single-layer mos 2 transistors, Nature Nanotechnology 6, 147 (2011)

    2011

  8. [15]

    Najmaei, M

    S. Najmaei, M. Amani, M. L. Chin, Z. Liu, A. G. Bird- well, T. P. O’Regan, P. M. Ajayan, M. Dubey, and J. Lou, 14 Electrical transport properties of polycrystalline mono- layer molybdenum disulfide, ACS Nano 8, 7930 (2014)

    2014

  9. [16]

    Y. Liu, J. Guo, Y. Wu, E. Zhu, N. O. Weiss, Q. He, H. Wu, H.-C. Cheng, Y. Xu, I. Shakir, Y. Huang, and X. Duan, Pushing the performance limit of sub-100 nm molybdenum disulfide transistors, Nano Letters 16, 6337 (2016)

    2016

  10. [17]

    K. S. Novoselov, A. Mishchenko, A. Carvalho, and A. H. C. Neto, 2d materials and van der waals heterostructures, Science 353, aac9439 (2016) , https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aac9439

    2016 doi

  11. [18]

    Somvanshi, S

    D. Somvanshi, S. Kallatt, C. Venkatesh, S. Nair, G. Gupta, J. K. Anthony, D. Karmakar, and K. Ma- jumdar, Nature of carrier injection in metal/2d- semiconductor interface and its implications for the limit s of contact resistance, Phys. Rev. B 96, 205423 (2017)

    2017

  12. [19]

    Y. Wu, D. Li, C.-L. Wu, H. Y. Hwang, and Y. Cui, Electrostatic gating and intercalation in 2d materials, Nature Reviews Materials 8, 41 (2023)

    2023

  13. [20]

    Boehm, J

    A. Boehm, J. J. Fonseca, K. Th¨ urmer, J. D. Sugar, C. D. Spataru, J. T. Robinson, and T. Ohta, Engineering of nanoscale heterogeneous transition metal dichalcogenide–au interfaces, Nano Letters 23, 2792 (2023)

    2023

  14. [21]

    H. M. W. Khalil, M. F. Khan, J. Eom, and H. Noh, Highly stable and tunable chem- ical doping of multilayer ws 2 field effect transistor: Reduction in contact resistance, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 7, 23589 (2015)

    2015

  15. [23]

    W. Li, X. Gong, Z. Yu, L. Ma, W. Sun, S. Gao, C ¸ . K¨ oro˘ glu, W. Wang, L. Liu, T. Li, H. Ning, D. Fan, Y. Xu, X. Tu, T. Xu, L. Sun, W. Wang, J. Lu, Z. Ni, J. Li, X. Duan, P. Wang, Y. Nie, H. Qiu, Y. Shi, E. Pop, J. Wang, and X. Wang, Approaching the quan- tum limit in two-d...

    2023

  16. [24]

    Nadeem, I

    M. Nadeem, I. Di Bernardo, X. Wang, M. S. Fuhrer, and D. Culcer, Overcoming boltzmann’s tyranny in a transistor via the topological quantum field effect, Nano Letters 21, 3155 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    Lin, P.-J

    K.-M. Lin, P.-J. Chen, C.-P. Chuu, and Y.-C. Chen, Effects of insertion of an h-aln mono- layer spacer in pt-wse 2-pt field-effect transistors, Scientific Reports 14, 24019 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Lin, K.-M

    Y.-C. Lin, K.-M. Lin, and Y.-C. Chen, Quantum trans- port calculations: An effective medium theory based on the projector augmented wave method with the plane- wave basis, Phys. Rev. B 112, 085155 (2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    R. Guo, X. Bu, S. Wang, and G. Zhao, En- hanced electron–phonon scattering in janus mosse, New Journal of Physics 21, 113040 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    Z. Bai, D. He, S. Fu, Q. Miao, S. Liu, M. Huang, K. Zhao, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, Recent progress in electron–phonon interaction of two-dimensional materi- als, Nano Select 3, 1112 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    D. H. Lee, S.-J. Choi, H. Kim, Y.-S. Kim, and S. Jung, Direct probing of phonon mode specific electron–phonon scatterings in two-dimensional semiconductor transition metal dichalcogenides, Nature Communications 12, 4520 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals, Phys. Rev. B 47, 558(R) (1993)

    1993

  23. [31]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  24. [32]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficiency of ab- initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Computational Materials Science 6, 15 (1996)

    1996

  25. [33]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseu- dopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999)

    1999

  26. [34]

    Taylor, H

    J. Taylor, H. Guo, and J. Wang, Ab initio modeling of quantum transport properties of molecular electronic de- vices, Phys. Rev. B 63, 245407 (2001)

    2001

  27. [35]

    Waldron, P

    D. Waldron, P. Haney, B. Larade, A. MacDon- ald, and H. Guo, Nonlinear spin current and magnetoresistance of molecular tunnel junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 166804 (2006)

    2006

  28. [36]

    L. V. Keldysh, Diagram technique for nonequilibrium processes, Sov. Phys. JETP. 20, 1018 (1965)

    1965

  29. [37]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Gen- eralized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  30. [38]

    J. P. Perdew, J. A. Chevary, S. H. Vosko, K. A. Jackson, M. R. Pederson, D. J. Singh, and C. Fiolhais, Atoms, molecules, solids, and surfaces: Applications of the gen- eralized gradient approximation for exchange and corre- lation, Phys. Rev. B 46, 6671 (1992)

    1992

  31. [39]

    Chen and Y.-C

    Y.-C. Chen and Y.-C. Chang, Thermoelectric opti- mization and quantum-to-classical crossover in gate- controlled two-dimensional semiconducting nanojunc- tions, ACS Nano 19, 34906 (2025)

    2025

  32. [40]

    Batool, M

    S. Batool, M. Idrees, S.-T. Han, V. A. L. Roy, and Y. Zhou, Electrical contacts with 2d materials: Current developments and fu- ture prospects, Small 19, 2206550 (2023) , https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/smll.202206550

    2023 doi

  33. [41]

    Y. Y. Illarionov, T. Knobloch, M. Jech, M. Lanza, D. Akinwande, M. I. Vexler, T. Mueller, M. C. Lemme, G. Fiori, F. Schwierz, and T. Grasser, In- sulators for 2d nanoelectronics: the gap to bridge, Nature Communications 11, 3385 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    S. B. Mitta, M. S. Choi, A. Nipane, F. Ali, C. Kim, J. T. Teherani, J. Hone, and W. J. Yoo, Electrical char- acterization of 2d materials-based field-effect transistor s, 2D Materials 8, 012002 (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    N. Fang, S. Toyoda, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, and K. Nagashio, Full energy spectra of interface state densities for n- and p-type mos 2 field-effect transistors, Advanced Functional Materials 29, 1904465 (2019) , https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/adfm.2019

    2019 doi

  36. [44]

    Q. Vu, S. Fan, S. Lee, M.-K. Joo, W. Yu, and Y. Lee, Near-zero hysteresis and near-ideal subthreshold swing in h-bn encapsulated single-layer mos 2 field-effect tran- sistors, 2D Materials 5 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    J. Wang, L. Cai, J. Chen, X. Guo, Y. Liu, Z. Ma, Z. Xie, H. Huang, M. Chan, Y. Zhu, L. Liao, Q. Shao, and Y. Chai, Transferred metal gate to 2d semicon- ductors for sub-1 v operation and near ideal sub- threshold slope, Science Advances 7, eabf8744 (2021) , https://www.science...

    2021 doi

  38. [46]

    Prakash and J

    A. Prakash and J. Appenzeller, Bandgap extraction and device analysis of ionic liquid gated wse 2 schottky barrier 15 transistors, ACS Nano 11, 1626 (2017)

    2017

  39. [47]

    F. Ali, H. Choi, N. Ali, Y. Hassan, T. D. Ngo, F. Ahmed, W.-K. Park, Z. Sun, and W. J. Yoo, Achieving near-ideal subthreshold swing in p-type wse 2 field-effect transis- tors, Advanced Electronic Materials 10, 2400071 (2024) , https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10....

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.