Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

A kilometer photonic link connecting superconducting circuits in two dilution refrigerators

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Superconducting circuits in two separate cryostats coherently exchange microwave signals through a 1-kilometer telecom optical fiber, using a pair of frequency-matched aluminum nitride electro-optic transducers.

desk verdict First inter-fridge coherent optical link, with a missing bypass control that a referee should demand. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.02444 v1 pith:5TFY2V52 submitted 2025-08-04 quant-ph physics.app-phphysics.optics

Yiyu Zhou , Yufeng Wu , Chunzhen Li , Mohan Shen , Likai Yang , Jiacheng Xie , Hong X. Tang This is my paper
classification quant-phphysics.app-phphysics.optics
keywords superconductingquantumnetworkmicrowave-to-opticaltransductionelectro-optictransduceraluminumnitridephotonicmoleculeVerniereffectcoherentlinkdilutionrefrigeratortelecomfiber
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first coherent photonic link between superconducting circuits in two separate dilution refrigerators. A microwave pulse is up-converted to telecom-band light by one aluminum nitride electro-optic transducer, travels through one kilometer of standard optical fiber, and is down-converted back to a microwave pulse by a second transducer in another cryostat. The two transducers are frequency matched using the Vernier effect between their slightly different optical resonance combs, and each node operates above 0.1% on-chip transduction efficiency. The result points toward a future in which individual quantum processors no longer need to share one refrigerator: they could be networked over room-temperature fiber, with an end-to-end microwave-to-microwave transmission about 80 dB better than a pair of commercial electro-optic modulators and orders of magnitude better than a kilometer of coaxial cable.

What carries the argument

The central object is the asymmetric photonic molecule: a pair of evanescently coupled aluminum nitride microrings whose hybridized modes form the red and blue sidebands of a triply resonant electro-optic transducer. The Vernier effect between the two free-spectral-range combs, with period $\mathrm{FSR}^2/\Delta\mathrm{FSR} \approx 90\ \mathrm{nm}$, guarantees a nearly matched resonance pair in the telecom band, and two DC electrodes per ring tune the sidebands so both the intra-cavity condition $\omega_m = \omega_+ - \omega_-$ and the inter-cavity condition $\omega_{+,\mathrm{Felix}} = \omega_{+,\mathrm{Albert}}$ are met. The load-bearing identity is $\eta = S_{\mathrm{oe,pk}} S_{\mathrm{eo,pk}} / (S_{\mathrm{oo,bg}} S_{\mathrm{ee,bg}})$, which turns four scattering-matrix measurements into the on-chip transduction efficiency of each node.

What would settle it

Perform a cut-back calibration of the two grating couplers and repeat the M2O2M transmission measurement with a variable fiber length; if the inferred on-chip efficiency falls below 0.1% or the phase of the scattering matrix deviates from linear across the conversion bandwidth, the claimed coherent 1-km link and its 80 dB advantage over electro-optic modulators would not hold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is an experimentally demonstrated microwave-to-optical-to-microwave (M2O2M) conversion link between two superconducting resonators located in separate dilution refrigerators, joined by a 1-km telecom fiber. Each node is a niobium superconducting resonator capacitively coupled to an aluminum nitride photonic molecule, two evanescently coupled microrings whose hybridized modes provide the red and blue sidebands with $\omega_+ - \omega_- = \omega_m$. The transducers are deliberately fabricated with different ring radii so their free spectral ranges differ by $\Delta\mathrm{FSR} = 2\pi\cdot 11\ \mathrm{GHz}$, making the Vernier effect guarantee a resonance pair with mismatch at most $2\pi\cdot 5.5\ \mathrm{GHz}$; DC electrodes then tune each sideband to satisfy both intra-cavity and inter-cavity matching. With on-chip efficiency above 0.1% per node, the authors measure a flat, linear-phase M2O2M scattering matrix, transmit quadrature phase-shift keying (QPSK) data across the link, and observe sine-shaped interference between the optically generated microwave tone and a local oscillator, three checks that establish phase coherence.

Load-bearing premise

The demonstration rests on being able to DC-tune two fabricated resonance combs into exact simultaneous resonance, both within each transducer and between the two transducers, and on those combs staying regular enough for the Vernier effect to supply a close pair; if the tuning range or comb regularity gives way, the link cannot be frequency matched.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A quantum processor in one refrigerator could, in principle, exchange microwave-frequency signals with a processor in another refrigerator through room-temperature telecom fiber, relaxing the single-cryostat size and cooling-power bottleneck.
  • Because telecom fiber loses only about 0.2 dB/km, the dominant loss is the two transducer conversions; with over 0.1% efficiency at each node the on-chip link transmission is near -60 dB, roughly 80 dB better than a pair of commercial electro-optic modulators.
  • The measured linear phase of the M2O2M scattering matrix and the clean interference fringe imply the link preserves microwave phase coherence, so phase-encoded quantum information could be carried rather than only classical pulses.
  • The Vernier-plus-DC-tuning recipe for matching two independent cavity transducers is a design guideline that can be transferred to other electro-optic or optomechanical transducer pairs.
  • The authors argue the link is compatible with heralding-based remote microwave entanglement, which would bypass the 50% efficiency threshold for purely photonic entanglement distribution.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implicit next step, not reported here, is to send weak coherent states or single photons through the link and check the photon statistics of the output microwave field; that would upgrade the demonstrated classical phase coherence into a quantum-enabled link.
  • The added-noise penalty of about 10 dB relative to the earlier device with a 14 micrometer electrode-ring gap suggests a concrete design trade-off: increasing the gap from 2.5 micrometers may cut light-induced quasiparticle noise faster than it reduces the electro-optic coupling, so the optimal gap may lie between these values.
  • The Vernier matching idea generalizes beyond electro-optics: any pair of cavity converters with controlled free-spectral-range differences could be matched to sub-gigahertz accuracy without active locking, easing fabrication tolerances for future multi-node networks.
  • If per-node efficiency is raised from 0.1% toward a few percent while added noise stays low, the same architecture would push the end-to-end link into a regime where fiber length is nearly irrelevant over metropolitan distances, making the refrigerator-to-refrigerator problem mostly a noise problem rather than a loss problem.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports coherent microwave-to-optical-to-microwave (M2O2M) signal transfer between two superconducting resonators housed in separate dilution refrigerators, connected by a 1-km telecom optical fiber. The link uses a pair of aluminum nitride electro-optic transducers that are frequency-matched through a Vernier scheme based on asymmetric photonic molecules, with individual DC tuning of the optical resonances. The authors characterize each transducer's on-chip efficiency (>0.1% near 4 mW pump power), the added noise of one transducer, and demonstrate coherence of the full link via the M2O2M scattering matrix phase, a QPSK constellation, and a local-oscillator interference fringe.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, this is a notable experimental milestone: it is, to my knowledge, the first demonstration of a coherent microwave-photonic link between two separate dilution refrigerators over a kilometer-scale telecom fiber, with phase-stable transfer. The design contributions—the Vernier-based inter-cavity matching, the reversed-electrode photonic-molecule phase matching, and the dual DC tuning—are concrete and useful. The paper also provides a direct efficiency comparison against commercial EOMs and a constructive discussion of noise sources. The main strength is the end-to-end coherence evidence; the main weakness is a missing control that would exclude an optical bypass path, which is essential to uniquely attribute the observed signal to transduction at the first node.

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 6 and Methods, 'Setup for noise measurement and photonic link'] The end-to-end link measurements in Fig. 6 do not include a control that rules out an optical bypass path. A component of the 9.960 GHz Felix drive leaking into the optical SSBM that generates the Albert pump would produce a spurious optical sideband at approximately the blue-sideband frequency omega_+; after propagation through the 1-km fiber and down-conversion at Albert with the omega_-,Albert pump, this would appear at the 4.606 GHz detection frequency. Because the three microwave sources are phase-locked, such a bypass would reproduce all three reported coherence checks: a resonant M2O2M response, a clean QPSK constellation, and a sinusoidal LO interference fringe. The standalone Soe/Seo characterization of Felix proves that the transducer can convert microwave to light, but it does not quantify leakage into the SSBM in the link configuration. Without a measurement with the Felix microwave drive disconnected (or the Felix optical pump blocked) showing that no signal reaches Albert, the signal cannot be unambiguously attributed to transduction at Felix. This control is load-bearing for the central claim and should be added.
  2. [Fig. 4(c), Eq. (1)] The on-chip transduction efficiency in Fig. 4(c) is presented without error bars or a statement about repeated measurements, despite the abstract's central quantitative claim of '>0.1% efficiency per node.' At least representative statistical uncertainties (or a statement that points are single measurements) are needed to assess whether the claimed threshold is robust.
  3. [Fig. 6, Methods] The end-to-end link loss is not reported in absolute terms. The authors should state the measured M2O2M transmission (or the equivalent on-chip link efficiency) and compare it to the value expected from the independently measured per-node efficiencies (Fig. 4c) and the fiber and coupling losses. Such a comparison would provide a quantitative consistency check that the signal indeed traversed both transducers and would make the bypass interpretation directly testable.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Extended Data Table 1] For Felix, the listed optical blue- and red-sideband frequencies differ by 2π·10 GHz (190.6420 THz − 190.6320 THz), while the listed microwave frequency is 2π·9.960 GHz. This 40-MHz discrepancy should be resolved or explicitly explained, since the intra-cavity condition ωm = ω+ − ω− is central to the design.
  2. [Fig. 6(d)] There is a typo: 'interference patten' should be 'interference pattern.'
  3. [Abstract, Fig. 1(b)] The phrase '80 dB improvement in transduction efficiency over commercial electro-optic modulators' refers to on-chip transduction efficiency (pair −60 dB vs. pair −140 dB) and does not include the −23.7 dB fiber-to-chip coupling loss noted in Fig. 1(b). The wording should be clarified to avoid overstating the end-to-end advantage.
  4. [Characterization of added noise] The added-noise characterization was performed only on Albert (due to TWPA bandwidth). The authors should note explicitly that Felix's added noise is not measured and briefly discuss any implications for the link's quantum capability, which they invoke in the concluding paragraph.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central link demonstration rests on direct end-to-end measurements, and the transduction-efficiency and coupling-rate determinations are standard calibrations with an independent COMSOL cross-check.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an experimental demonstration: the M2O2M scattering matrix, QPSK constellation, and local-oscillator interference fringe are directly measured end-to-end across the 1-km fiber link, with no fitted parameter being promoted to a prediction. The on-chip transduction efficiency is obtained from measured scattering parameters through Eq. (1), a standard calibration formula cited to refs. 15 and 28, which does not assume the result being claimed. The single-photon coupling rate geo is inferred from the measured efficiency via Eq. (21) and then independently compared with a COMSOL calculation from Eq. (19); the agreement is a consistency check rather than a circular fit, because the COMSOL value is fixed by geometry and material parameters, not by the measured efficiency. The 80 dB improvement over commercial EOMs is arithmetic from the measured >0.1% per-node efficiency. Self-citations (refs. 12, 15, 44) appear for standard formulas and prior device results, but the load-bearing steps do not reduce to those citations: Eq. (21) is a standard cooperativity expression, and the hybridized-mode basis is textbook coupled-mode theory. The Vernier frequency-matching claim is supported by measured resonance frequencies and DC tuning, not by a self-citation. No step was found in which a named prediction is equivalent by construction to an input; the skeptical concern about a possible optical-bypass path is an experimental-control issue, not a circularity of the derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard cavity electro-optic theory, the AlN Pockels coefficient, and a design assumption about the Vernier effect. No new entities are postulated, and no free parameters are fitted to make the derivation work. The measured geo is a validation point, not an input.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The electro-optic (Pockels) effect in AlN with coefficient r33 ≈ 1 pm/V underlies the transduction Hamiltonian (Eq. 14).
    Used in the derivation of the single-photon coupling rate geo in the Methods; the r33 value is taken from the literature (ref 41).
  • domain assumption The microwave field of the superconducting resonator is spatially uniform along the ring and has no θ dependence, so the microwave mode volume simplifies to Veff,m = 4πR ∫∫ (εm,zz|um,z|² + εm,rr|um,r|²)drdz.
    Stated in the Methods: 'Because the superconducting resonator size is significantly smaller than the microwave wavelength, the microwave field is assumed to be spatially uniform along the ring and has no θ dependence.' This is used to compute geo.
  • domain assumption The Vernier effect with FSR difference ΔFSR = 2π·11 GHz guarantees a resonance pair with frequency mismatch ≤ ΔFSR/2 within 1550 ± 45 nm.
    Design premise stated in 'Frequency matching between the transducer pair'; enables inter-cavity matching without requiring full a priori knowledge of all resonances.
  • domain assumption The cavity electro-optic transduction efficiency is described by the standard cooperativity formula η = (κ+,ex/κ+)(κm,ex/κm)[4C/(1+C)²], where C = 4G_eo²/(κmκ+).
    Used to convert measured S-parameters to on-chip efficiency and to estimate geo; follows the theoretical framework of ref. 12.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A kilometer photonic link connecting superconducting circuits in two dilution refrigerators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5TFY2V52

@misc{pith2026250802444,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A kilometer photonic link connecting superconducting circuits in two dilution refrigerators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5TFY2V52}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.02444}
}
read the original abstract

Superconducting quantum processors are a leading platform for implementing practical quantum computation algorithms. Although superconducting quantum processors with hundreds of qubits have been demonstrated, their further scaling up is constrained by the physical size and cooling power of dilution refrigerators. This constraint can be overcome by constructing a quantum network to interconnect qubits hosted in different refrigerators, which requires microwave-to-optical transducers to enable low-loss signal transmission over long distances. Despite that various designs and demonstrations have achieved high-efficiency and low-added-noise transducers, a coherent photonic link between separate refrigerators has not yet been realized. In this work, we experimentally demonstrate coherent signal transfer between two superconducting circuits housed in separate dilution refrigerators, enabled by a pair of frequency-matched aluminum nitride electro-optic transducers connected via a 1-km telecom optical fiber. With transducers at each node achieving >0.1% efficiency, an overall 80 dB improvement in transduction efficiency over commercial electro-optic modulators is attainable, paving the way towards a fully quantum-enabled link. This work provides critical design guidelines towards scalable superconducting quantum networks interconnected by photonic links.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Memory-assisted multimode microwave-to-optical transduction

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    First experimental demonstration of memory-assisted on-demand multimode microwave-to-optical transduction with 0.3-0.4 noise photons at 460-620 microsecond storage in a 171Yb3+:Y2SiO5 crystal at 30 mK.

  2. Stable, bidirectional electro-optic transduction in thin film lithium tantalate

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    First demonstration of stable bidirectional microwave-optical transduction in thin-film lithium tantalate with ~1 kHz coupling rates, multi-day static-bias operation, and low added noise.

  3. The power of entanglement in distributed quantum machine learning

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Entanglement improves classification accuracy in distributed quantum ML tasks across datasets, but excessive amounts degrade performance by reducing effective parameter dimension.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    A blueprint for demonstrating quantum supremacy with superconducting qubits,

    C. Neill, P. Roushan, K. Kechedzhi, S. Boixo, S. V . Isakov, V . Smelyanskiy, A. Megrant, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, K. Arya, et al. , “A blueprint for demonstrating quantum supremacy with superconducting qubits,” Science 360, 195 (2018)

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold,

    R. Acharya, D. A. Abanin, L. Aghababaie-Beni, I. Aleiner, T. I. Andersen, M. Ansmann, F. Arute, K. Arya, A. Asfaw, N. Astrakhantsev, et al., “Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold,” Nature 638, 920 (2025)

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Establishing a new benchmark in quantum computational advantage with 105-qubit zuchongzhi 3.0 processor,

    D. Gao, D. Fan, C. Zha, J. Bei, G. Cai, J. Cai, S. Cao, F. Chen, J. Chen, K. Chen, et al. , “Establishing a new benchmark in quantum computational advantage with 105-qubit zuchongzhi 3.0 processor,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 090601 (2025)

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Evidence for quantum annealing with more than one hundred qubits,

    S. Boixo, T. F. Rønnow, S. V . Isakov, Z. Wang, D. Wecker, D. A. Lidar, J. M. Martinis, and M. Troyer, “Evidence for quantum annealing with more than one hundred qubits,” Nat. Phys. 10, 218 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    The impact of hardware specifications on reaching quantum advantage in the fault tolerant regime,

    M. Webber, V . Elfving, S. Weidt, and W. K. Hensinger, “The impact of hardware specifications on reaching quantum advantage in the fault tolerant regime,” A VS Quantum Sci. 4 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Engineering cryogenic setups for 100-qubit scale superconducting circuit systems,

    S. Krinner, S. Storz, P. Kurpiers, P. Magnard, J. Heinsoo, R. Keller, J. Luetolf, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, “Engineering cryogenic setups for 100-qubit scale superconducting circuit systems,” EPJ Quantum Technol. 6, 2 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Microwave quantum link between superconducting circuits housed in spatially separated cryogenic systems,

    P. Magnard, S. Storz, P. Kurpiers, J. Schär, F. Marxer, J. Lütolf, T. Walter, J.-C. Besse, M. Gabureac, K. Reuer, et al., “Microwave quantum link between superconducting circuits housed in spatially separated cryogenic systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 260502 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Cryogenic microwave link for quantum local area networks,

    W. Yam, M. Renger, S. Gandorfer, F. Fesquet, M. Handschuh, K. Honasoge, F. Kronowetter, Y . Nojiri, M. Partanen, M. Pfeiffer, et al. , “Cryogenic microwave link for quantum local area networks,” npj Quantum Info. 11, 1 (2025). 7

    work page 2025

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    A review of lithium niobate modulators for fiber-optic communications systems,

    E. L. Wooten, K. M. Kissa, A. Yi-Yan, E. J. Murphy, D. A. Lafaw, P. F. Hallemeier, D. Maack, D. V . Attanasio, D. J. Fritz, G. J. McBrien, et al., “A review of lithium niobate modulators for fiber-optic communications systems,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 6, 69 (2000)

    2000

  2. [10]

    A cryogenic electro-optic interconnect for superconducting devices,

    A. Youssefi, I. Shomroni, Y . J. Joshi, N. R. Bernier, A. Lukashchuk, P. Uhrich, L. Qiu, and T. J. Kippenberg, “A cryogenic electro-optic interconnect for superconducting devices,” Nat. Electron. 4, 326 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    Photonic link from single-flux-quantum circuits to room temperature,

    M. Shen, J. Xie, Y . Xu, S. Wang, R. Cheng, W. Fu, Y . Zhou, and H. X. Tang, “Photonic link from single-flux-quantum circuits to room temperature,” Nat. Photon. 18, 371 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    Superconducting cavity electro- optics: a platform for coherent photon conversion between superconducting and photonic circuits,

    L. Fan, C.-L. Zou, R. Cheng, X. Guo, X. Han, Z. Gong, S. Wang, and H. X. Tang, “Superconducting cavity electro- optics: a platform for coherent photon conversion between superconducting and photonic circuits,” Sci. Adv. 4, eaar4994 (2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    All-optical superconducting qubit readout,

    G. Arnold, T. Werner, R. Sahu, L. N. Kapoor, L. Qiu, and J. M. Fink, “All-optical superconducting qubit readout,” Nat. Phys. 21, 393 (2025)

    2025

  6. [14]

    Coherent control of a superconducting qubit using light,

    H. K. Warner, J. Holzgrafe, B. Yankelevich, D. Barton, S. Poletto, C. Xin, N. Sinclair, D. Zhu, E. Sete, B. Langley, et al., “Coherent control of a superconducting qubit using light,” Nat. Phys. 21, 831 (2025)

    2025

  7. [15]

    Bidirectional interconversion of microwave and light with thin-film lithium niobate,

    Y . Xu, A. A. Sayem, L. Fan, C.-L. Zou, S. Wang, R. Cheng, W. Fu, L. Yang, M. Xu, and H. X. Tang, “Bidirectional interconversion of microwave and light with thin-film lithium niobate,” Nat. Commun. 12, 4453 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Cryogenic microwave-to-optical conversion using a triply resonant lithium-niobate-on-sapphire transducer,

    T. P. McKenna, J. D. Witmer, R. N. Patel, W. Jiang, R. Van Laer, P. Arrangoiz-Arriola, E. A. Wollack, J. F. Herrmann, and A. H. Safavi-Naeini, “Cryogenic microwave-to-optical conversion using a triply resonant lithium-niobate-on-sapphire transducer,” Optica 7, 1737 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Ultralow voltage, high-speed, and energy-efficient cryogenic electro-optic modulator,

    P. Pintus, A. Singh, W. Xie, L. Ranzani, M. V . Gustafsson, M. A. Tran, C. Xiang, J. Peters, J. E. Bowers, and M. Soltani, “Ultralow voltage, high-speed, and energy-efficient cryogenic electro-optic modulator,” Optica 9, 1176 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    Superconducting-qubit readout via low-backaction electro-optic transduction,

    R. Delaney, M. Urmey, S. Mittal, B. Brubaker, J. Kindem, P. Burns, C. Regal, and K. Lehnert, “Superconducting-qubit readout via low-backaction electro-optic transduction,” Nature 606, 489 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Cavity electro-optics in thin-film lithium niobate for efficient microwave-to-optical transduction,

    J. Holzgrafe, N. Sinclair, D. Zhu, A. Shams-Ansari, M. Colangelo, Y . Hu, M. Zhang, K. K. Berggren, and M. Lon ˇcar, “Cavity electro-optics in thin-film lithium niobate for efficient microwave-to-optical transduction,”Optica 7, 1714 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Efficient microwave to optical photon conversion: an electro-optical realization,

    A. Rueda, F. Sedlmeir, M. C. Collodo, U. V ogl, B. Stiller, G. Schunk, D. V . Strekalov, C. Marquardt, J. M. Fink, O. Painter, et al. , “Efficient microwave to optical photon conversion: an electro-optical realization,” Optica 3, 597 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    An integrated magneto-optic modulator for cryogenic applications,

    P. Pintus, L. Ranzani, S. Pinna, D. Huang, M. V . Gustafsson, F. Karinou, G. A. Casula, Y . Shoji, Y . Takamura, T. Mizumoto, et al. , “An integrated magneto-optic modulator for cryogenic applications,” Nat. Electron. 5, 604 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    Waveguide cavity optomagnonics for microwave-to-optics conversion,

    N. Zhu, X. Zhang, X. Han, C.-L. Zou, C. Zhong, C.-H. Wang, L. Jiang, and H. X. Tang, “Waveguide cavity optomagnonics for microwave-to-optics conversion,”Optica 7, 1291 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Coherent coupling between phonons, magnons, and photons,

    Z. Shen, G.-T. Xu, M. Zhang, Y .-L. Zhang, Y . Wang, C.- Z. Chai, C.-L. Zou, G.-C. Guo, and C.-H. Dong, “Coherent coupling between phonons, magnons, and photons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 243601 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    Single-sideband microwave-to-optical conversion in high-Q ferrimagnetic microspheres,

    C.-Z. Chai, Z. Shen, Y .-L. Zhang, H.-Q. Zhao, G.-C. Guo, C.-L. Zou, and C.-H. Dong, “Single-sideband microwave-to-optical conversion in high-Q ferrimagnetic microspheres,” Photon. Res. 10, 820 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    Superconducting qubit to optical photon transduction,

    M. Mirhosseini, A. Sipahigil, M. Kalaee, and O. Painter, “Superconducting qubit to optical photon transduction,”Nature 588, 599 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    Quantum-enabled microwave-to-optical transduction via silicon nanomechanics,

    H. Zhao, W. D. Chen, A. Kejriwal, and M. Mirhosseini, “Quantum-enabled microwave-to-optical transduction via silicon nanomechanics,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 20, 602 (2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    Optical readout of a superconducting qubit using a piezo-optomechanical transducer,

    T. van Thiel, M. Weaver, F. Berto, P. Duivestein, M. Lemang, K. Schuurman, M. Žemli ˇcka, F. Hijazi, A. Bernasconi, C. Ferrer, et al. , “Optical readout of a superconducting qubit using a piezo-optomechanical transducer,” Nat. Phys. 21, 401 (2025)

    2025

  20. [28]

    Bidirectional and efficient conversion between microwave and optical light,

    R. W. Andrews, R. W. Peterson, T. P. Purdy, K. Cicak, R. W. Simmonds, C. A. Regal, and K. W. Lehnert, “Bidirectional and efficient conversion between microwave and optical light,”Nat. Phys. 10, 321 (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    Efficient bidirectional piezo-optomechanical transduction between microwave and optical frequency,

    W. Jiang, C. J. Sarabalis, Y . D. Dahmani, R. N. Patel, F. M. Mayor, T. P. McKenna, R. Van Laer, and A. H. Safavi-Naeini, “Efficient bidirectional piezo-optomechanical transduction between microwave and optical frequency,” Nat. Commun. 11, 1166 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    Cavity piezo-mechanics for superconducting-nanophotonic quantum interface,

    X. Han, W. Fu, C. Zhong, C.-L. Zou, Y . Xu, A. A. Sayem, M. Xu, S. Wang, R. Cheng, L. Jiang, et al. , “Cavity piezo-mechanics for superconducting-nanophotonic quantum interface,” Nat. Commun. 11, 3237 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    An integrated microwave-to-optics interface for scalable quantum computing,

    M. J. Weaver, P. Duivestein, A. C. Bernasconi, S. Scharmer, M. Lemang, T. C. v. Thiel, F. Hijazi, B. Hensen, S. Gröblacher, and R. Stockill, “An integrated microwave-to-optics interface for scalable quantum computing,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 166 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Electrically interfaced Brillouin-active waveguide for microwave photonic measurements,

    Y . Zhou, F. Ruesink, M. Pavlovich, R. Behunin, H. Cheng, S. Gertler, A. L. Starbuck, A. J. Leenheer, A. T. Pomerene, D. C. Trotter, et al. , “Electrically interfaced Brillouin-active waveguide for microwave photonic measurements,” Nat. Commun. 15, 6796 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    Converting microwave and telecom photons with a silicon photonic nanomechanical interface,

    G. Arnold, M. Wulf, S. Barzanjeh, E. Redchenko, A. Rueda, W. J. Hease, F. Hassani, and J. M. Fink, “Converting microwave and telecom photons with a silicon photonic nanomechanical interface,” Nat. Commun. 11, 4460 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    Non-classical microwave–optical photon pair generation with a chip-scale transducer,

    S. Meesala, S. Wood, D. Lake, P. Chiappina, C. Zhong, A. D. Beyer, M. D. Shaw, L. Jiang, and O. Painter, “Non-classical microwave–optical photon pair generation with a chip-scale transducer,” Nat. Phys. 20, 871 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Quantum entanglement between optical and microwave photonic qubits,

    S. Meesala, D. Lake, S. Wood, P. Chiappina, C. Zhong, A. D. Beyer, M. D. Shaw, L. Jiang, and O. Painter, “Quantum entanglement between optical and microwave photonic qubits,” Phys. Rev. X 14, 031055 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    Scalable microwave-to-optical transducers at the single-photon level with spins,

    T. Xie, R. Fukumori, J. Li, and A. Faraon, “Scalable microwave-to-optical transducers at the single-photon level with spins,” Nat. Phys. 21, 931 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Microwave-to-optical transduction with erbium ions coupled to planar photonic and superconducting resonators,

    J. Rochman, T. Xie, J. G. Bartholomew, K. Schwab, and A. Faraon, “Microwave-to-optical transduction with erbium ions coupled to planar photonic and superconducting resonators,” Nat. Commun. 14, 1153 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    Coherent optical-microwave interface for manipulation of low-field electronic clock transitions in 171Yb3+:Y2SiO5,

    L. Nicolas, M. Businger, T. Sanchez Mejia, A. Tiranov, T. Chanelière, E. Lafitte-Houssat, A. Ferrier, P. Goldner, and M. Afzelius, “Coherent optical-microwave interface for manipulation of low-field electronic clock transitions in 171Yb3+:Y2SiO5,” npj Quantum Info. 9, 21 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Characterization of Er 3+:YVO4 for microwave to optical transduction,

    T. Xie, J. Rochman, J. G. Bartholomew, A. Ruskuc, J. M. Kindem, I. Craiciu, C. W. Thiel, R. L. Cone, and A. Faraon, “Characterization of Er 3+:YVO4 for microwave to optical transduction,” Phys. Rev. B 104, 054111 (2021). 8

    2021

  32. [40]

    Microwave-optical quantum frequency conversion,

    X. Han, W. Fu, C.-L. Zou, L. Jiang, and H. X. Tang, “Microwave-optical quantum frequency conversion,” Optica 8, 1050 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    R. W. Boyd, Nonlinear optics, 4th ed. (Academic Press, 2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    High-efficiency, cryogenic-compatible grating couplers on an AlN-on-sapphire platform through bottom-side coupling,

    Y . Zhou, M. Shen, C. Li, L. Yang, J. Xie, and H. X. Tang, “High-efficiency, cryogenic-compatible grating couplers on an AlN-on-sapphire platform through bottom-side coupling,” Opt. Lett. 50, 742 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    Photonic molecule quantum optics,

    K. Liao, X. Hu, T. Gan, Q. Liu, Z. Wu, C. Fan, X. Feng, C. Lu, Y .-c. Liu, and Q. Gong, “Photonic molecule quantum optics,” Adv. Opt. Photon. 12, 60 (2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    Cavity electro-optic circuit for microwave-to-optical conversion in the quantum ground state,

    W. Fu, M. Xu, X. Liu, C.-L. Zou, C. Zhong, X. Han, M. Shen, Y . Xu, R. Cheng, S. Wang, et al., “Cavity electro-optic circuit for microwave-to-optical conversion in the quantum ground state,” Phys. Rev. A 103, 053504 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    Aluminum nitride photonic integrated circuits: from piezo-optomechanics to nonlinear optics,

    X. Liu, A. W. Bruch, and H. X. Tang, “Aluminum nitride photonic integrated circuits: from piezo-optomechanics to nonlinear optics,” Adv. Opt. Photon. 15, 236 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    Fast recovery of niobium- based superconducting resonators after laser illumination,

    C. Li, Y . Xu, Y . Wu, M. C. C. Pace, M. D. LaHaye, M. Senatore, and H. X. Tang, “Fast recovery of niobium- based superconducting resonators after laser illumination,” arXiv:2507.16082 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Smooth etching of epitaxially grown AlN film by Cl2/BCl3/Ar-based inductively coupled plasma,

    X. Liu, C. Sun, B. Xiong, L. Niu, Z. Hao, Y . Han, and Y . Luo, “Smooth etching of epitaxially grown AlN film by Cl2/BCl3/Ar-based inductively coupled plasma,” V acuum116, 158 (2015)

    2015

  40. [48]

    A near–quantum-limited Josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifier,

    C. Macklin, K. O’brien, D. Hover, M. Schwartz, V . Bolkhovsky, X. Zhang, W. Oliver, and I. Siddiqi, “A near–quantum-limited Josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifier,” Science 350, 307 (2015)

    2015

  41. [49]

    Radiative cooling of a superconducting resonator,

    M. Xu, X. Han, C.-L. Zou, W. Fu, Y . Xu, C. Zhong, L. Jiang, and H. X. Tang, “Radiative cooling of a superconducting resonator,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 033602 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    Long- distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics,

    L.-M. Duan, M. D. Lukin, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, “Long- distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics,” Nature 414, 413 (2001)

    2001

  43. [51]

    Proposal for heralded generation and detection of entangled microwave– optical-photon pairs,

    C. Zhong, Z. Wang, C. Zou, M. Zhang, X. Han, W. Fu, M. Xu, S. Shankar, M. H. Devoret, H. X. Tang, et al. , “Proposal for heralded generation and detection of entangled microwave– optical-photon pairs,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 010511 (2020)

    2020

  44. [52]

    Electro- optic entanglement source for microwave to telecom quantum state transfer,

    A. Rueda, W. Hease, S. Barzanjeh, and J. M. Fink, “Electro- optic entanglement source for microwave to telecom quantum state transfer,” npj Quantum Info. 5, 108 (2019)

    2019

  45. [53]

    Quantum capacities of bosonic channels,

    M. M. Wolf, D. Pérez-García, and G. Giedke, “Quantum capacities of bosonic channels,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 130501 (2007)

    2007

  46. [54]

    C. C. Gerry and P. L. Knight, Introductory quantum optics (Cambridge University Press, 2023). 9 ������� Photonic molecules transduction efficiency The photonic molecule structure in our work is realized by evanescently coupling two identical microring resonators. We denote the...

    2023

  47. [55]

    The evanescent coupling introduces the hybridized optical modes as ˆa+ = cos θ ˆa1 + sin θ ˆa2, ˆa− = −sin θ ˆa1 + cos θ ˆa2, (11) where tan2 θ = 2gc ω1−ω2

    +Heo, (10) where gc is the evanescent coupling strength between ˆa1 and ˆa2, and Heo is the electro-optic interaction Hamiltonian to be discussed later. The evanescent coupling introduces the hybridized optical modes as ˆa+ = cos θ ˆa1 + sin θ ˆa2, ˆa− = −sin θ ˆa1 + cos θ ˆa2...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.