Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 57 references

Investigating a Characteristic Time Lag in the Ionospheric F-region's Response to Solar Flares

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For every one of ten powerful solar flares, the F-region ionosphere's electron content responded to He II 304 Å flare emission in under a minute, and the delay shrank as the EUV flux jump grew.

desk verdict A concrete EUV-to-TEC delay measurement that deserves a referee, but the sub-minute claim hinges on time resolution we cannot verify from the corrupted full text. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.03425 v1 pith:UZIFS3MR submitted 2025-08-05 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.EPphysics.ao-phphysics.geo-phphysics.space-ph

Aisling N. O'Hare , Susanna Bekker , Harry J. Greatorex , Ryan O. Milligan This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.EPphysics.ao-phphysics.geo-phphysics.space-ph
keywords solarflaresionosphericF-regiontotalelectroncontentHeII304ÅEUVresponsetimelagspaceweathersolar-terrestrialcoupling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the F-region of Earth's ionosphere responds to the extreme-ultraviolet (EUV) light of a solar flare almost immediately: for ten powerful flares, the delay between He II 304 Å emission and the total electron content (TEC) response was under one minute in every case. It further claims the delay is not random, correlating strongly ($-0.85$) with the size of the He II flux increase, so more intense EUV pulses yield faster F-region responses. This matters because the timing of the F-region's response to EUV has not been systematically measured, and it sets the pace for ionospheric changes that can affect radio and navigation signals.

What carries the argument

The central object is the time lag between two time series: the solar He II 304 Å EUV irradiance, which serves as a proxy for the flare's EUV energy input, and the ionospheric total electron content (TEC), the column density of electrons in the ionosphere. The paper estimates the lag by cross-correlating these series for each flare and then regresses the resulting delays against solar and geophysical parameters, including He II flux change, rate of increase, flare magnitude, X-ray-to-He II ratio, and season.

What would settle it

Take a single flare observed with sub-minute (for example 10-second) EUV and TEC data and measure the cross-correlation lag; if the lag remains pinned at the sampling interval rather than shortening, the sub-minute delays reported here are an artefact of cadence, not a physical response time.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is a set of measured delays rather than a new mechanism. For the ten powerful flares studied, the lag between He II 304 Å EUV emission and the TEC response is consistently below one minute. The delay correlates at $-0.85$ with the He II flux change, at $-0.55$ with the rate of He II flux increase, at $-0.80$ with flare magnitude, and at $-0.75$ with the X-ray-to-He II flux ratio at peak He II emission, while flares nearer the summer solstice show longer delays. The paper reads these correlations as evidence that incident EUV and X-ray flux parameters control how fast the F-region electron content responds.

Load-bearing premise

All of the quoted sub-minute delays depend on the measurements being able to resolve time lags smaller than one minute; if the EUV and TEC time series are sampled at one-minute cadence, the delays may just be the resolution limit rather than a physical lag.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Ionospheric models should treat EUV-driven electron production in the F-region as effectively instantaneous at minute scales, rather than assuming multi-minute delays.
  • A larger He II flux increase means a shorter response delay, giving a quantitative, correlation-based relationship that can be tested against future flares.
  • The X-ray-to-He II ratio and seasonal trends provide new inputs for upper-ionospheric recombination-rate calculations and atmospheric modelling.
  • Operational space-weather forecasting can use the sub-minute response time to anticipate EUV-driven electron-content changes that affect radio and navigation systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: Because all measured delays are below one minute, they may be limited by the sampling cadence; sub-minute EUV and TEC observations would be needed to know whether the true physical lag is even shorter.
  • Editorial inference: The strong anticorrelation between delay and He II flux change suggests the lag is set by the ionization rate rather than by slower neutral-wind or plasma-transport processes; a photochemical model of the F-region could test this directly.
  • Editorial inference: The longer delays near summer solstice point toward solar zenith angle or neutral-composition effects; comparing flares at matched local times across seasons would separate those influences.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the time delay between He II 304 Å EUV flare emission (from EVE/SDO) and the ionospheric F-region TEC response for 10 powerful solar flares. The authors report that all 10 delays are under 1 minute, and they examine correlations between these delays and several solar/geophysical parameters, finding strong negative correlations with He II flux change (-0.85), flare magnitude (-0.80), X-ray-to-He II ratio (-0.75), and a moderate correlation with rate of increase of He II flux (-0.55). They also note longer delays for flares closer to summer solstice. The stated motivation is that EUV-driven F-region response delays have not been studied systematically, with potential applications in recombination-rate calculations and space-weather mitigation. The manuscript as provided, however, is severely corrupted (mojibake) and includes a stray arXiv identifier from an unrelated cond-mat preprint, making the methods and results sections unreadable. The central claims therefore cannot be independently audited from the supplied text.

Significance. If the reported sub-minute delays and the -0.85 correlation with He II flux change are robust, this would fill a genuine gap in solar-terrestrial physics: most prior work focuses on X-ray-driven E-region effects, while the EUV-driven F-region response time has been less systematically quantified. The direct use of empirical delay measurements without circular reuse of fitted parameters is a strength; there is no appearance of the authors inventing free parameters or using predictions as inputs. However, the significance is currently conditional on the unverifiable methods. The paper would be more valuable if it provided a complete, readable methods section, explicit uncertainty quantification for the delays and correlations, and a clear demonstration that the sub-minute values are not limited by the temporal resolution of the data. As it stands, the work is a potentially interesting empirical study whose credibility hinges on details that the supplied text does not permit the reader to check.

major comments (4)
  1. [Full Text (Methods and Results, unreadable)] The supplied full text is heavily corrupted (mojibake) and contains a stray arXiv identifier, arXiv:2508.03427v2 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci], from an unrelated preprint. This prevents the reader from accessing the actual methods text: the data sources, the exact delay-estimation algorithm, the definition of flare selection criteria, and the handling of baseline or background are all unreadable. This is load-bearing because the headline claim—all delays under 1 minute—cannot be evaluated without knowing the temporal resolution and the delay-extraction procedure. The authors must provide a clean, complete manuscript (or at minimum a detailed and legible methods appendix) before the central result can be assessed.
  2. [Abstract] The correlations (-0.85, -0.55, -0.80, -0.75) are reported without error bars, p-values, or confidence intervals, and the sample size is only 10 flares. For n=10, a two-tailed correlation of -0.55 is not significant at the 5% level (critical r ≈ 0.632), and r=-0.75 has a p-value around 0.012, so only the strongest of the four reported correlations survives a basic multiple-testing correction. The paper must report significance levels (or bootstrap/permutation intervals) for each correlation and discuss the multiplicity of the tests performed, otherwise the adjective 'strong' is not statistically supported.
  3. [Abstract / Full Text (Data Resolution)] The central claim of sub-minute delays requires that the measurement system is capable of resolving time lags below 1 minute. The abstract gives no cadence for either the He II 304 Å or the TEC time series. If the TEC product is sampled at 1-minute or coarser intervals, the fitted delays would be quantized to integer sample offsets, and the variance in the delays—and hence the correlations—could reflect the lag grid rather than a physical ionospheric response. The manuscript must state the native sampling of both datasets, any interpolation or oversampling applied, and an uncertainty for each delay estimate (e.g., from Monte Carlo or jackknife procedures). Without this information, the reported 'all delays under 1 minute' cannot be distinguished from a resolution-limited measurement.
  4. [Full Text (Correlation Analysis, unreadable)] The definitions of 'He II flux change' and 'rate of increase' are not recoverable from the corrupted text. Because the delay is measured between the same He II time series used to compute the flux change, the strong correlation between delay and flux change could be sensitive to the choice of pre-flare baseline, the peak-definition window, or the flare-start time. The authors should specify exact formulas (for example, ΔF = F_peak − F_preflare with a stated preflare interval and averaging window) and show that the correlation is robust to reasonable variations in these choices, ideally by a sensitivity analysis.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Full Text (Header)] The stray identifier 'arXiv:2508.03427v2 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] 15 Aug 2025' appears in the middle of the provided text; whatever the cause, this extraneous material must be removed before submission.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase 'X-ray-to-He II flux ratio at peak He II emission' is ambiguous: it should be clarified whether the ratio is evaluated at the time of maximum He II flux or as the ratio of the respective peak values of the two time series.
  3. [Nomenclature] The abstract writes 'F-region' while other parts of the text appear to vary; the standard IAU term is 'F region' (or 'F-layer'), and the authors should use one consistent form throughout.
  4. [Data Availability] The paper should include a data-availability statement listing the specific versions of the EVE and TEC products, their processing levels, and the URLs or repositories from which they were obtained.
  5. [Figures and Tables] The figures and tables are not legible in the provided text; the authors should ensure high-resolution vector figures and machine-readable tables so that the 10 individual delays and their uncertainties are fully visible.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the delays and correlations are empirical measurements with no fitted parameter reused as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central quantities are directly measured time delays between He II 304 Angstrom emission and the ionospheric TEC response for ten flares, with empirical correlations against flux parameters. The abstract states that these delays are 'calculated' from observations, not derived from a model fitted to the same data. There is no self-definitional step, since the delay is not defined in terms of the correlation target; there is no fitted input renamed as a prediction; and no load-bearing self-citation is visible in the available text. The supplied full text is corrupted with mojibake, so the delay-estimation procedure cannot be audited; however, the absence of an inspectable methods section is an audibility or correctness concern, not circularity. The concern about temporal resolution, namely that sub-minute delays with one-minute cadence would be at the sampling limit, is a measurement-resolution issue rather than a circularity issue. No quoted passage in the paper exhibits a reduction of a claimed result to its own inputs, so under the requirement to exhibit a specific circular reduction, no circular step is identified. The paper therefore receives a score of 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities were identifiable from the abstract. The central analysis relies on standard domain assumptions about solar EUV drivers and TEC measurements, but the full text is required to audit them properly.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption He II 304 Angstrom emission is a suitable proxy for the EUV irradiance driving the F-region response.
    The paper uses He II 304 as the incident EUV signal; if other EUV lines or continua also contribute to F-region ionization, the measured delay could be biased.
  • domain assumption The TEC response peak is unambiguously identifiable and attributable to the flare.
    The delay is computed between He II peak and TEC peak; if TEC varies due to other geophysical processes, the peak could be misidentified.
  • domain assumption The 10 selected flares are representative of powerful solar flares.
    The correlations are based on only 10 events, so sampling biases could influence the reported coefficients.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Investigating a Characteristic Time Lag in the Ionospheric F-region's Response to Solar Flares." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UZIFS3MR

@misc{pith2026250803425,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Investigating a Characteristic Time Lag in the Ionospheric F-region's Response to Solar Flares},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UZIFS3MR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.03425}
}
read the original abstract

X-ray and EUV solar flare emission cause increases in the Earth's dayside ionospheric electron density. While the response of the lower ionosphere to X-rays is well studied, the delay between EUV flare emission and the response of the ionospheric F-region has not been investigated. Here, we calculate the delays between incident He II 304 Angstrom emission, and the TEC response for 10 powerful solar flares, all of which exhibit delays under 1 minute. We assess these delays in relation to multiple solar and geophysical factors, and find a strong negative correlation (-0.85) between delay and He II flux change and a moderate negative correlation (-0.55) with rate of increase in He II flux. Additionally, flare magnitude and the X-ray-to-He II flux ratio at peak He II emission show strong negative correlations (-0.80 and -0.75, respectively). We also identify longer delays for flares occurring closer to the summer solstice. These results may have applications in upper-ionospheric recombination rate calculations, atmospheric modelling, and other solar-terrestrial studies. We highlight the importance of incident EUV and X-ray flux parameters on the response time of the ionospheric electron content, and these findings may also have implications for mitigating disruptions in communication and navigation systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ionospheric Effects of Solar Flares; Reidel : Dordrecht, The Netherlands; Boston, MA, USA, 1974

    Mitra, A.P. Ionospheric Effects of Solar Flares; Reidel : Dordrecht, The Netherlands; Boston, MA, USA, 1974

    work page 1974

  2. [2]

    Effects of X2-class solar flare events on ionospheric GPS-TEC and radio waves over Brazilian sector

    de Abreu, A.J.; Roberto, M.; Alves, M.A.; Abalde, J.R.; Nogueira, P.A.B.; Venkatesh, K.; Fagundes, P.R.; de Jesus, R.; Gende, M.; Martin, I.M. Effects of X2-class solar flare events on ionospheric GPS-TEC and radio waves over Brazilian sector. Adv. Space Res. 2019 , 63 , 3586--3605

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    A brief review of ``solar flare effects'' on the ionosphere

    Tsurutani, B.T.; Verkhoglyadova, O.P.; Mannucci, A.J.; Lakhina, G.S.; Li, G.; Zank, G.P. A brief review of ``solar flare effects'' on the ionosphere. Radio Sci. 2009 , 44 , 1--14

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    The GPS measured SITEC caused by the very intense solar flare on July 14, 2000

    Wan, W.; Liu, L.; Yuan, H.; Ning, B.; Zhang, S. The GPS measured SITEC caused by the very intense solar flare on July 14, 2000. Adv. Space Res. 2005 , 36 , 2465--2469

    work page 2000

  5. [5]

    Variability of thermosphere and ionosphere responses to solar flares

    Qian, L.; Burns, A.G.; Chamberlin, P.C.; Solomon, S.C. Variability of thermosphere and ionosphere responses to solar flares. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2011 , 116 , A10309

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    Impact factor for the ionospheric total electron content response to solar flare irradiation

    Zhang, D.H.; Mo, X.H.; Cai, L.; Zhang, W.; Feng, M.; Hao, Y.Q.; Xiao, Z. Impact factor for the ionospheric total electron content response to solar flare irradiation. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2011 , 116 , A04311

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Confirming geomagnetic Sfe by means of a solar flare detector based on GNSS

    Curto, J.J.; Juan, J.M.; Timoté, C.C. Confirming geomagnetic Sfe by means of a solar flare detector based on GNSS. J. Space Weather. Space Clim. 2019 , 9 , A42

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Occurrence of solar flares viewed with GPS: Statistics and fractal nature

    Monte-Moreno, E.; Hernández-Pajares, M. Occurrence of solar flares viewed with GPS: Statistics and fractal nature. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2014 , 119 , 9216--9227

    work page 2014

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    Studying the ionosphere with the Global Positioning System

    Davies, K.; Hartmann, G.K. Studying the ionosphere with the Global Positioning System. Radio Sci. 1997 , 32 , 1695--1703

    1997

  2. [10]

    Model-based reproduction and validation of the total spectra of a solar flare and their impact on the global environment at the X9.3 event of September 6, 2017

    Watanabe, K.; Jin, H.; Nishimoto, S.; Imada, S.; Kawai, T.; Kawate, T.; Otsuka, Y.; Shinbori, A.; Tsugawa, T.; Nishioka, M. Model-based reproduction and validation of the total spectra of a solar flare and their impact on the global environment at the X9.3 event of September 6...

    2017

  3. [11]

    Modeling the responses of the middle latitude ionosphere to solar flares

    Le H.; Liu, L.; Chen, B.; Lei, J.; Yue, X.; Wan, W. Modeling the responses of the middle latitude ionosphere to solar flares. J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 2007 , 69 , 1587--1598

    2007

  4. [12]

    Statistical analysis for EUV dynamic spectra and their impact on the ionosphere during solar flares

    Nishimoto, S.; Watanabe, K.; Jin, H.; Kawai, T.; Imada, S.; Kawate, T.; Otsuka, Y.; Shinbori, A.; Tsugawa, T.; Nishioka, M. Statistical analysis for EUV dynamic spectra and their impact on the ionosphere during solar flares. Earth Planets Space 2023 , 75 , 30

    2023

  5. [13]

    Observations of X-ray and EUV fluxes during X-class solar flares and response of upper ionosphere

    Mahajan, K.K.; Lodhi, N.K.; Upadhayaya, A.K. Observations of X-ray and EUV fluxes during X-class solar flares and response of upper ionosphere. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2010 , 115 , A12330

    2010

  6. [14]

    Effect of TEC variation on GPS precise point at low latitude

    Tiwari, R.; Bhattacharya, S.; Purohit, P.K.; Gwal, A.K. Effect of TEC variation on GPS precise point at low latitude. Open Atmos. Sci. J. 2009 , 3 , 1--12

    2009

  7. [15]

    International Standards and Recommended Practices, Annex 10 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, Volume 1, Radio Navigation Aids

    ICAO. International Standards and Recommended Practices, Annex 10 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, Volume 1, Radio Navigation Aids. 1996 . Available online: https://ffac.ch/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/ICAO-Annex-10-Aeronautical- Telecommunications-Vol-I-Radio-...

    1996

  8. [16]

    Ionospheric Radio; Institution of Electrical Engineers: London, UK, 1990

    Davies, K. Ionospheric Radio; Institution of Electrical Engineers: London, UK, 1990

    1990

  9. [17]

    Solar flare induced ionospheric D-region enhancements from VLF amplitude observations

    Thomson, N.R.; Clilverd, M.A. Solar flare induced ionospheric D-region enhancements from VLF amplitude observations. J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 2001 , 63 , 1729--1737

    2001

  10. [18]

    Response of the low ionosphere to X-ray and Lyman- solar flare emissions

    Raulin, J.-P.; Trottet, G.; Kretzschmar, M.; Macotela, E.L.; Pacini, A.; Bertoni, F.C.P.; Dammasch, I.E. Response of the low ionosphere to X-ray and Lyman- solar flare emissions. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2013 , 118 , 570--575

    2013

  11. [19]

    Solar flare effects on the earth's lower ionosphere

    Hayes, L.A.; O'Hara, O.S.D.; Murray, S.A.; Gallagher, P.T. Solar flare effects on the earth's lower ionosphere. Sol. Phys. 2021 , 296 , 157

    2021

  12. [20]

    Modelling of the electron density and total electron content in the quiet and solar X-ray flare perturbed ionospheric d-region based on remote sensing by VLF/LF signals

    Nina, A. Modelling of the electron density and total electron content in the quiet and solar X-ray flare perturbed ionospheric d-region based on remote sensing by VLF/LF signals. Remote Sens. 2021 , 14 , 54

    2021

  13. [21]

    Influence of the neutral atmosphere model on the correctness of simulation the electron and ion concentrations in the lower ionosphere

    Bekker, S.Z.; Korsunskaya, J.A. Influence of the neutral atmosphere model on the correctness of simulation the electron and ion concentrations in the lower ionosphere. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2023 , 128 , e2023JA032007

    2023

  14. [22]

    Relation between VLF phase deviations and solar X-ray fluxes during solar flares

    Pant, P. Relation between VLF phase deviations and solar X-ray fluxes during solar flares. Astrophys. Space Sci. 1993 , 209 , 297--306

    1993

  15. [23]

    Solar flare induced ionospheric D-region enhancements from VLF phase and amplitude observations

    McRae, W.M.; Thomson, N.R. Solar flare induced ionospheric D-region enhancements from VLF phase and amplitude observations. J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 2004 , 66 , 77--87

    2004

  16. [24]

    Large solar flares and their ionospheric D region enhancements

    Thomson, N.R.; Rodger, C.J.; Clilverd, M.A. Large solar flares and their ionospheric D region enhancements. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2005 , 110 , A06306

    2005

  17. [25]

    Solar flares induced D-region ionospheric and geomagnetic perturbations

    Selvakumaran, R.; Maurya, A.K.; Gokani, S.A.; Veenadhari, B.; Kumar, S.; Venkatesham, K.; Phanikumar, D.V.; Singh, A.K.; Siingh, D.; Singh, R. Solar flares induced D-region ionospheric and geomagnetic perturbations. J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 2015 , 123 , 102--112

    2015

  18. [26]

    Modeling of the Lower Ionosphere during Solar X-ray Flares of Different Classes

    Bekker, S.Z.; Ryakhovskiy, I.A.; Korsunskaya, J.A. Modeling of the Lower Ionosphere during Solar X-ray Flares of Different Classes. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2021 , 126 , e2020JA028767

    2021

  19. [27]

    Characteristics of the Earth-Ionosphere Waveguide for VLF Radio Waves; US Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards : Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 1964 ; Volume 13

    Wait, J.R.; Spies, K.P. Characteristics of the Earth-Ionosphere Waveguide for VLF Radio Waves; US Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards : Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 1964 ; Volume 13

    1964

  20. [28]

    Appleton, E. V. A note on the ``sluggishness'' of the ionosphere. J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. 1953 , 3 , 282--284

    1953

  21. [29]

    X-ray emission and D-region ``sluggishness''

    Valnicek, B.; Ranzinger, P. X-ray emission and D-region ``sluggishness''. Bull. Astron. Inst. Czechoslov. 1972 , 23 , 318

    1972

  22. [30]

    Basak, T.; Chakrabarti, S.K. Effective recombination coefficient and solar zenith angle effects on low-latitude D-region ionosphere evaluated from VLF signal amplitude and its time delay during X-ray solar flares. Astrophys. Space Sci. 2013 , 348 , 315--326

    2013

  23. [31]

    Numerical analysis of electron density and response time delay during solar flares in mid-latitudinal lower ionosphere

    Chakraborty, S.; Basak, T. Numerical analysis of electron density and response time delay during solar flares in mid-latitudinal lower ionosphere. Astrophys. Space Sci. 2020 , 365 , 184

    2020

  24. [32]

    D-region electron density evaluated from VLF amplitude time delay during X-ray solar flares

    Žigman, V.; Grubor, D.; Šulić, D. D-region electron density evaluated from VLF amplitude time delay during X-ray solar flares. J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 2007 , 69 , 775--792

    2007

  25. [33]

    Pulsations in the Earth's Lower Ionosphere Synchronized With Solar Flare Emission

    Hayes, L.A.; Gallagher, P.T.; McCauley, J.; Dennis, B.R.; Ireland, J.; Inglis, A. Pulsations in the Earth's Lower Ionosphere Synchronized With Solar Flare Emission. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2017 , 122 , 9841--9847

    2017

  26. [34]

    The influence of different phases of a solar flare on changes in the total electron content in the Earth's ionosphere

    Bekker, S.; Milligan, R.O.; Ryakhovsky, I.A. The influence of different phases of a solar flare on changes in the total electron content in the Earth's ionosphere. Astrophys. J. 2024 , 971 , 188

    2024

  27. [35]

    Quasi-periodic pulsations in ionospheric TEC synchronized with solar flare EUV emission

    O'Hare, A.N.; Bekker, S.; Hayes, L.A.; Milligan, R.O. Quasi-periodic pulsations in ionospheric TEC synchronized with solar flare EUV emission. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2025 , 130 , e2024JA033493

    2025

  28. [36]

    The Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) ; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012

    Pesnell, W.D.; Thompson, B.J.; Chamberlin, P.C. The Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) ; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012

    2012

  29. [37]

    Extreme Ultraviolet Variability Experiment (EVE) on the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO): Overview of science objectives, instrument design, data products, and model developments

    Woods, T.N.; Eparvier, F.G.; Hock, R.; Jones, A.R.; Woodraska, D.; Judge, D.; Didkovsky, L.; Lean, J.; Mariska, J.; Warren, H.; et al. Extreme Ultraviolet Variability Experiment (EVE) on the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO): Overview of science objectives, instrument design, d...

    2012

  30. [38]

    Solar extreme-ultraviolet irradiance for general circulation models

    Solomon, S.C.; Qian, L. Solar extreme-ultraviolet irradiance for general circulation models. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2005 , 110 , A10306

    2005

  31. [39]

    New Solar Extreme-Ultraviolet Irradiance Observations During Flares

    Woods, T.N.; Hock, R.; Eparvier, F.; Jones, A.R.; Chamberlin, P.C.; Klimchuk, J.A.; Didkovsky, L.; Judge, D.; Mariska, J.; Warren, H.; et al. New Solar Extreme-Ultraviolet Irradiance Observations During Flares. Astrophys. J. 2011 , 739 , 59

    2011

  32. [40]

    The SunPy Project: Open Source Development and Status of the Version 1.0 Core Package

    The SunPy Community; Barnes, W.T.; Bobra, M.G.; Christe, S.D.; Freij, N.; Hayes, L.A.; Ireland, J.; Mumford, S.; Perez-Suarez, D.; Ryan, D.F.; et al. The SunPy Project: Open Source Development and Status of the Version 1.0 Core Package. Astrophys. J. 2020 , 890 , 68

    2020

  33. [41]

    Heliophysics event knowledgebase for the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) and beyond

    Hurlburt, N.; Cheung, M.; Schrijver, C.; Chang, L.; Freel, ; S.; Green, S.; Heck, C.; Jaffey, A.; Kobashi, A.; Schiff, D.; et al. Heliophysics event knowledgebase for the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) and beyond. In The Solar Dynamics Observatory ; Springer: New York, NY, U...

    2012

  34. [42]

    Global Positioning System; Springer: New York, USA, 1992

    Hofmann-Wellenhof, B.; Lichtenegger, H.; Collins, J. Global Positioning System; Springer: New York, USA, 1992

    1992

  35. [43]

    Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation

    Schober, P.; Boer, C.; Schwarte, L.A. Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth. Analg. 2018 , 126 , 1763--1768

    2018

  36. [44]

    On correlation coefficients and their interpretation

    Papageorgiou, S.N. On correlation coefficients and their interpretation. J. Orthod. 2022 , 49 , 359--361

    2022

  37. [45]

    Estimation of the Contribution of the Ionospheric D Region to the TEC Value During a Series of Solar Flares in September 2017

    Bekker, S.Z.; Ryakhovsky, I.A. Estimation of the Contribution of the Ionospheric D Region to the TEC Value During a Series of Solar Flares in September 2017. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2024 , 129 , e2024JA032577

    2017

  38. [46]

    Global Ionospheric Response to X-Class Flares During the Solar Cycle 24: An Investigation Using IGS Network

    Sreeraj, M.S.; Sumod, S.G.; Kavya, E.M.; Mildred, S.; Pant, T.K.; Hari, P. Global Ionospheric Response to X-Class Flares During the Solar Cycle 24: An Investigation Using IGS Network. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2025 , 130 , e2024JA033290

    2025

  39. [47]

    Design and calibration of the GOES-8 solar x-ray sensor: The XRS

    Hanser, F.A.; Sellers, F.B. Design and calibration of the GOES-8 solar x-ray sensor: The XRS. GOES-8 Beyond 1996 , 2812 , 344--352

    1996

  40. [48]

    Statistical analysis of ionospheric responses to solar flares in the solar cycle 23

    Le H.; Liu, L.; Chen, Y.; Wan, W. Statistical analysis of ionospheric responses to solar flares in the solar cycle 23. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2013 , 118 , 576--582

    2013

  41. [49]

    Low latitude ionospheric TEC response to the solar flares during the peak of solar cycle 24

    Saharan, S.; Maurya, A.K.; Dube, A.; Patil, O.M.; Singh, R.; Sharma, H. Low latitude ionospheric TEC response to the solar flares during the peak of solar cycle 24. Adv. Space Res. 2023 , 72 , 3890--3902

    2023

  42. [50]

    Statistical analysis of solar EUV and X-ray flux enhancements induced by solar flares and its implication to upper atmosphere

    Le H.; Liu, L.; He, H.; Wan, W. Statistical analysis of solar EUV and X-ray flux enhancements induced by solar flares and its implication to upper atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2011 , 116 , A11301

    2011

  43. [51]

    Ionospheric response to X-class solar flares in the ascending half of the subdued solar cycle 24

    Hazarika, R.; Kalita, B.R.; Bhuyan, P.K. Ionospheric response to X-class solar flares in the ascending half of the subdued solar cycle 24. J. Earth Syst. Sci. 2016 , 125 , 1235--1244

    2016

  44. [52]

    Estimation of the Ionospheric D-Region Ionization Caused by X-Class Solar Flares Based on VLF Observations

    Ryakhovsky, I.A.; Poklad, Y.V.; Gavrilov, B.G.; Bekker, S.Z. Estimation of the Ionospheric D-Region Ionization Caused by X-Class Solar Flares Based on VLF Observations. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2024 , 129

    2024

  45. [53]

    Ionospheric model validation at VLF and LF

    Ferguson, J.A. Ionospheric model validation at VLF and LF. Radio Sci. 1995 , 30 , 775--782

    1995

  46. [54]

    Experimental daytime VLF ionospheric parameters

    Thomson, N.R. Experimental daytime VLF ionospheric parameters. J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. 1993 , 55 , 173--184

    1993

  47. [55]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

  48. [56]

    write FUNCTION editor.postfix editor num.names #1 >

    " write FUNCTION editor.postfix editor num.names #1 > "( )" "( )" if FUNCTION editor.trans.postfix editor num.names #1 > "( )" "( )" if FUNCTION trans.postfix translator num.names #1 > "( )" "( )" if FUNCTION authors.editors.reflist.apa5 'field := 'dot := field num.names 'numn...

  49. [57]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION formatfull.doi doi empty "" " https://doi.org/" doi * " " * if FUNCTION article output.bibitem format.authors "author" output.check author format.key output output.year.check new.block format.title "title" output.check ne...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.