Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Graphical Calculus for Fermionic Tensors

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper introduces a graphical calculus of fermionic tensors that extends the ZX calculus, making fermionic many-body manipulations purely diagrammatic with anticommutation signs carried by the rewriting rules.

desk verdict A coherent and useful-looking fermionic ZX-calculus, but the load-bearing sign axioms are exactly what we could not verify from the corrupt full text. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.03976 v1 pith:NAF6L772 submitted 2025-08-06 quant-ph cond-mat.str-el

Yuanjie Ren , Kaifeng Bu , Andreas Bauer This is my paper
classification quant-phcond-mat.str-el MSC 81P68 PACS 03.67.-a
keywords graphicalcalculusfermionictensorsZXMajoranamodesGaussianstatestensornetworksfermionizationquantumerror-correctingcodes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to bring fermionic physics into the diagrammatic world of ZX calculus. It proposes a collection of fermionic tensor building blocks and tensor-network equations such that operations on fermionic states, partial traces, purifications, and bosonization maps can be derived by drawing and rewriting diagrams, with the awkward minus signs of anticommuting variables handled by the rules rather than by hand. If correct, standard fermionic computations become formal diagrammatic identities, and the same language covers both qubit-like and fermion-like systems. This matters because diagrammatic rewriting is compact, compositional, and well suited to automated or machine-checkable verification.

What carries the argument

The central object is the collection of fermionic tensor generators together with their defining tensor-network equations. The load-bearing rule is the parity-twisted swap on wires carrying odd-parity fermionic states: moving one odd-parity wire past another introduces the sign $-1$, matching fermionic exchange statistics. All other equations—analogues of ZX spider, Hopf, bialgebra, and Frobenius identities—are chosen so that every diagram rewrite preserves that sign structure, which is what lets graphical proofs replace algebraic sign bookkeeping.

What would settle it

Take the diagram for exchanging two odd-parity fermionic wires. Applying the calculus's swap rule twice must return the same diagram, and the single swap must produce exactly the standard exchange phase of two fermions. Also, compute the partial trace of a two-Majorana state by diagrams and compare with explicit matrix algebra; any mismatch in a global phase refutes the soundness of the equations.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a modest set of fermionic tensor generators—wires carrying fermionic modes, qubits, and fixed odd-parity states—together with tensor-network equations suffices to express and manipulate fermionic physics entirely by diagrams. In this calculus, the usual chore of tracking phases from anticommuting operators is absorbed into the graph: crossing or merging odd-parity wires produces exactly the minus signs that fermionic algebra requires. The same equations reduce to ordinary ZX calculus when all wires are qubit-like, so qubit and fermion operations coexist in one language. Applications include fermionic Gaussian states, partial traces over Majorana modes, purif

Load-bearing premise

The calculus is only as trustworthy as its axioms: if any defining tensor equation misencodes the fermionic anticommutation sign—particularly the $-1$ from swapping two odd-parity modes—every diagrammatic derivation built on it inherits wrong phases, and the claimed equivalence to fermionic physics fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the calculus is sound, every diagrammatic proof it supports is a valid fermionic identity, including Gaussian-state overlaps and expectation values.
  • Partial traces of Majorana-mode subsystems can be evaluated by local diagram rewrites rather than by expanding density matrices.
  • Purification protocols for fermionic states can be derived as graphical equalities, so the resulting purifications are correct by construction.
  • Fermionization and bosonization maps become expressible as diagrams, giving a single notational bridge between the two descriptions.
  • Fermionic code constructions become diagrammatic, extending the qubit ZX treatment to code states living on fermionic modes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • We would push the calculus toward a rewriting system: if its equations are terminating and confluent, the language becomes a decision procedure for the class of fermionic identities it covers.
  • Because ZX calculus is tied to measurement-based quantum computing, this fermionic extension likely opens a diagrammatic route to fermionic measurement-based protocols, though the paper does not develop that application.
  • The odd-parity wires look like a categorical account of fermionic phases; one testable offshoot is to check whether the calculus captures the full fermionic linear-optical fragment, not just Gaussian states.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a graphical calculus for fermionic tensor networks, with indices including fermionic modes, qubits, and fixed odd-parity states. It claims to extend the ZX calculus and to enable purely diagrammatic computations for fermionic Gaussian states, partial traces of Majorana modes, purification protocols, fermionization and bosonization maps, and fermionic code constructions. The abstract is clear and the intended scope is substantial. However, the supplied full text is corrupted: equations, figures, and derivations are rendered as non-ASCII replacement glyphs, so the actual defining rules and the application derivations cannot be read or checked.

Significance. If correct, a fermionic graphical calculus that faithfully encodes anticommutation signs and extends the ZX calculus would be a useful contribution to tensor-network methods in quantum many-body physics and quantum information. The paper's axioms are not fitted to data and have no free parameters, which is a strength. The listed applications—Gaussian states, partial trace, purification, fermionization/bosonization, and quantum error-correcting codes—would demonstrate practical value. However, the central soundness claim, and especially the fermionic crossing/SWAP sign conventions, is entirely unverifiable from the supplied text. No machine-checked proofs or companion code are visible. The significance is therefore conditional on a readable and correct presentation of the defining equations.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2 (defining equations)] The load-bearing content is the set of tensor-network equations defining the fermionic tensors, in particular the crossing rule that must implement the fermionic SWAP sign for pairs of odd-parity states. In the supplied PDF, Section 2 is unreadable: the equations appear as replacement glyphs, so I cannot check whether the relative phase -1 appears when two odd-parity wires are crossed, nor whether the generator set is complete for the targeted applications. Every later derivation inherits its phases from this section. The authors should provide a readable version with explicit sign conventions and, ideally, a standalone statement of the crossing rule and its derivation from the Majorana algebra.
  2. [Section 3 (applications)] The abstract claims applications to fermionic Gaussian states, partial traces of Majorana modes, purification, fermionization/bosonization, and fermionic codes. The corresponding derivations are not legible in the supplied text. I could not verify a single application-level equation or diagrammatic identity. The authors should ensure that all equations in Section 3 are readable and that at least one representative application—for example, the partial-trace rule or the purification protocol—is carried out explicitly enough to exhibit the sign handling.
  3. [General, claim of completeness] The abstract states that the calculus 'can be used to perform various computations', but I found no explicit statement or proof of what the generator set is complete for. If completeness is claimed, it should be stated precisely and proved; if only a set of worked examples is claimed, the wording should be adjusted. This is secondary to soundness, but it matters for the paper's central assertion that the calculus 'extends the ZX calculus' in a usable way.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Full text / encoding] The PDF text is corrupted, with widespread non-ASCII replacement characters. This blocks all technical review. The manuscript should be regenerated with standard LaTeX fonts and correct encoding before resubmission.
  2. [References and numbering] The table of contents and references are also garbled in the supplied text, so I could not assess whether relevant prior work on ZX calculus and fermionic tensor networks is cited. Please ensure reference metadata is intact.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the calculus is axiomatic and the applications are consistency demonstrations.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is definitional in a benign sense: it introduces a set of fermionic tensors and tensor-network equations, then uses those equations to derive representations of Gaussian states, partial traces, purification protocols, fermionization/bosonization maps, and fermionic codes. These derivations do not feed fitted data back into the axioms: there are no free parameters, no empirical predictions, and no load-bearing self-citation chain visible in the supplied text. The parity/crossing sign rules, which are the most assumption-heavy part, are explicit axioms of the calculus rather than conclusions imported from prior work. Recovering fermionic anticommutation signs from those axioms is a consistency check of the framework, not circularity. The corrupted text encoding prevents a full equation-level audit, but that is a verifiability limitation, not evidence of a circular step. No step meets the standard of 'reduces by construction' or 'fitted input renamed as prediction,' so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted numbers or hand-tuned constants appear in the abstract; the calculus is a set of definitions and rewrite rules. No new physical entities (particles, forces, dimensions) are introduced. The 'fixed odd-parity states' are standard sectors of the fermionic Fock space used as wire labels, not new physics. The three axioms listed capture what the central claim rests on: the CAR algebra, the ZX base, and the completeness of the paper's own generator set.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Fermionic Fock space with canonical anticommutation relations (CAR) governs every wire labeled as a fermionic mode; the calculus's tensors act on this space.
    The abstract's statement that indices correspond to fermionic modes presupposes the standard fermionic algebra of creation and annihilation operators; the entire sign bookkeeping is built on this algebra.
  • standard math The ZX calculus for qubits (spiders, H gate, and its known rules) is taken as given, and the fermionic calculus is an extension of it.
    Invoked by the abstract's sentence 'extends the ZX calculus'; any error or incompleteness in the ZX base would propagate into the fermionic extension.
  • ad hoc to paper The chosen generator set (fermionic modes, qubits, fixed odd-parity states) together with the proposed equations is complete for the targeted fermionic computations.
    This is the paper's own construction choice. Completeness of a novel generator set is not inherited from prior literature and must be established inside the paper, which could not be verified from the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Graphical Calculus for Fermionic Tensors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NAF6L772

@misc{pith2026250803976,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Graphical Calculus for Fermionic Tensors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NAF6L772}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.03976}
}
read the original abstract

We introduce a graphical calculus, consisting of a set of fermionic tensors with tensor-network equations, which can be used to perform various computations in fermionic many-body physics purely diagrammatically. The indices of our tensors primarily correspond to fermionic modes, but also include qubits and fixed odd-parity states. Our graphical calculus extends the ZX calculus for systems involving qubits. We apply the calculus in order to represent various objects, operations, and computations in physics, including fermionic Gaussian states, the partial trace of Majorana modes, purification protocols, fermionization and bosonization maps, and the construction of fermionic codes.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Majorana-Pauli stabilizer codes and duality webs of fermionic topological phases

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 8.0 of 10

    Majorana-Pauli stabilizer codes realize the fermionic toric code and place it in a duality web connecting bosonic and fermionic topological orders via anyon condensation and gauging.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Verstraete, V

    F. Verstraete, V. Murg, and J.I. Cirac. Matrix product states, projected entangled pair states, and variational renormalization group methods for quantum spin systems. Advances in Physics, 57 0 (2): 0 143–224, March 2008. ISSN 1460-6976. doi:10.1080/14789940801912366. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14789940801912366

    doi:10.1080/14789940801912366 2008

  2. [2]

    Hand-waving and interpretive dance: an introductory course on tensor networks

    Jacob C Bridgeman and Christopher T Chubb. Hand-waving and interpretive dance: an introductory course on tensor networks. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 50 0 (22): 0 223001, May 2017. ISSN 1751-8121. doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa6dc3. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aa6dc3

    doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa6dc3 2017

  3. [3]

    Tensor networks for non-invertible symmetries in 3+1d and beyond, 2024

    Pranay Gorantla, Shu-Heng Shao, and Nathanan Tantivasadakarn. Tensor networks for non-invertible symmetries in 3+1d and beyond, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.12978

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states

    Román Orús. A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states. Annals of Physics, 349: 0 117–158, October 2014. ISSN 0003-4916. doi:10.1016/j.aop.2014.06.013. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2014.06.013

    doi:10.1016/j.aop.2014.06.013 2014

  5. [5]

    G. Vidal. Class of quantum many-body states that can be efficiently simulated. Physical Review Letters, 101 0 (11), September 2008. ISSN 1079-7114. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.110501. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.110501

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.110501 2008

  6. [6]

    Entanglement renormalization and holography

    Brian Swingle. Entanglement renormalization and holography. Physical Review D, 86 0 (6), September 2012. ISSN 1550-2368. doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.065007. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.065007

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.065007 2012

  7. [7]

    Steven R. White. Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups. Phys. Rev. Lett., 69: 0 2863--2866, Nov 1992. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2863. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2863

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.2863 1992

  8. [8]

    A Diagrammatic Axiomatisation for Qubit Entanglement

    Amar Hadzihasanovic. A diagrammatic axiomatisation for qubit entanglement, 2015. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1501.07082

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    A near-optimal axiomatisation of zx-calculus for pure qubit quantum mechanics, 2018

    Renaud Vilmart. A near-optimal axiomatisation of zx-calculus for pure qubit quantum mechanics, 2018. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.09114

    2018 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Zh: A complete graphical calculus for quantum computations involving classical non-linearity

    Miriam Backens and Aleks Kissinger. Zh: A complete graphical calculus for quantum computations involving classical non-linearity. Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science, 287: 0 23–42, January 2019. ISSN 2075-2180. doi:10.4204/eptcs.287.2. URL http://dx.doi.org/...

    2019 doi

  3. [11]

    Zx-calculus for the working quantum computer scientist, 2020

    John van de Wetering. Zx-calculus for the working quantum computer scientist, 2020. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.13966

    2020 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Shaikh, Lia Yeh, Richie Yeung, and Bob Coecke

    Boldizsár Poór, Quanlong Wang, Razin A. Shaikh, Lia Yeh, Richie Yeung, and Bob Coecke. Completeness for arbitrary finite dimensions of zxw-calculus, a unifying calculus. In 2023 38th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS), page 1–14. IEEE, June 2023. doi...

    2023

  5. [13]

    Shaikh, Lia Yeh, and Stefano Gogioso

    Razin A. Shaikh, Lia Yeh, and Stefano Gogioso. The focked-up zx calculus: Picturing continuous-variable quantum computation, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.02905

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Reducing the number of non-clifford gates in quantum circuits

    Aleks Kissinger and John van de Wetering. Reducing the number of non-clifford gates in quantum circuits. Physical Review A, 102 0 (2), August 2020. ISSN 2469-9934. doi:10.1103/physreva.102.022406. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.102.022406

    2020 doi

  7. [15]

    Graph-theoretic simplification of quantum circuits with the zx-calculus

    Ross Duncan, Aleks Kissinger, Simon Perdrix, and John van de Wetering. Graph-theoretic simplification of quantum circuits with the zx-calculus. Quantum, 4: 0 279, June 2020. ISSN 2521-327X. doi:10.22331/q-2020-06-04-279. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-06-04-279

    2020 doi

  8. [16]

    Estarellas, William J

    Michael Hanks, Marta P. Estarellas, William J. Munro, and Kae Nemoto. Effective compression of quantum braided circuits aided by zx-calculus. Phys. Rev. X, 10: 0 041030, Nov 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.10.041030. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.10.041030

    2020 doi

  9. [17]

    The zx calculus is a language for surface code lattice surgery

    Niel de Beaudrap and Dominic Horsman. The zx calculus is a language for surface code lattice surgery. Quantum, 4: 0 218, January 2020. ISSN 2521-327X. doi:10.22331/q-2020-01-09-218. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-01-09-218

    2020 doi

  10. [18]

    A graphical approach to measurement-based quantum computing, 2012

    Ross Duncan. A graphical approach to measurement-based quantum computing, 2012. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1203.6242

    2012 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Unifying flavors of fault tolerance with the zx calculus

    Hector Bombin, Daniel Litinski, Naomi Nickerson, Fernando Pastawski, and Sam Roberts. Unifying flavors of fault tolerance with the zx calculus. Quantum, 8: 0 1379, June 2024. ISSN 2521-327X. doi:10.22331/q-2024-06-18-1379. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.22331/q-2024-06-18-1379

    2024 doi

  12. [20]

    Topological error correcting processes from fixed-point path integrals

    Andreas Bauer. Topological error correcting processes from fixed-point path integrals. Quantum 8, page 1288, 2024 a . doi:10.22331/q-2024-03-20-1288

    2024 doi

  13. [22]

    Floquetifying the colour code

    Alex Townsend-Teague, Julio Magdalena de la Fuente, and Markus Kesselring. Floquetifying the colour code. EPTCS, 384: 0 265--303, 2023. doi:10.4204/EPTCS.384.14

    2023 doi

  14. [23]

    Majorana fermion codes

    Sergey Bravyi, Barbara M Terhal, and Bernhard Leemhuis. Majorana fermion codes. New Journal of Physics, 12 0 (8): 0 083039, August 2010. ISSN 1367-2630. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/8/083039. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/12/8/083039

    2010 doi

  15. [24]

    Chien, and Daniel Gottesman

    Maryam Mudassar, Riley W. Chien, and Daniel Gottesman. Encoding majorana codes. Physical Review A, 110 0 (3), September 2024. ISSN 2469-9934. doi:10.1103/physreva.110.032430. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.110.032430

    2024 doi

  16. [25]

    Pachos, Jin-Shi Xu, Yong-Jian Han, Chuan-Feng Li, and Guang-Can Guo

    Jia-Kun Li, Kai Sun, Ze-Yan Hao, Jia-He Liang, Si-Jing Tao, Jiannis K. Pachos, Jin-Shi Xu, Yong-Jian Han, Chuan-Feng Li, and Guang-Can Guo. Photonic simulation of majorana-based jones polynomials. Phys. Rev. Lett., 133: 0 230603, Dec 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.230603. U...

    2024 doi

  17. [26]

    Gorshkov, Mohammad Hafezi, and Michael J

    Alexander Schuckert, Eleanor Crane, Alexey V. Gorshkov, Mohammad Hafezi, and Michael J. Gullans. Fermion-qubit fault-tolerant quantum computing, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.08955

    2024 arXiv

  18. [27]

    Interferometric single-shot parity measurement in inas–al hybrid devices

    Microsoft Azure Quantum. Interferometric single-shot parity measurement in inas–al hybrid devices. Nature, 638: 0 651–655, February 2025. doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08445-2. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1621345114

    2025 doi

  19. [28]

    Fermionic gaussian testing and non-gaussian measures via convolution, 2024 a

    Xingjian Lyu and Kaifeng Bu. Fermionic gaussian testing and non-gaussian measures via convolution, 2024 a . URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.08180

    2024 arXiv

  20. [29]

    Displaced fermionic gaussian states and their classical simulation, 2024 b

    Xingjian Lyu and Kaifeng Bu. Displaced fermionic gaussian states and their classical simulation, 2024 b . URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.18517

    2024 arXiv

  21. [30]

    Kraus, Norbert Schuch, Frank Verstraete, and J

    Christina V. Kraus, Norbert Schuch, Frank Verstraete, and J. Ignacio Cirac. Fermionic projected entangled pair states. Phys. Rev. A, 81: 0 052338, 2010. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.81.052338

    2010 doi

  22. [31]

    Barthel, C

    T. Barthel, C. Pineda, and J. Eisert. Unitary circuits for strongly correlated fermions. Phys. Rev. A, 80: 0 042333, 2009

    2009

  23. [32]

    Bultinck, J

    N. Bultinck, J. Williamson, J. Haegeman, and F. Verstraete. Fermionic projected entangled-pair states and topological phases. J. Phys. A, 51: 0 025202, 2017

    2017

  24. [33]

    Tensor types and their use in physics, 2022

    Andreas Bauer and Alexander Nietner. Tensor types and their use in physics, 2022

    2022

  25. [34]

    Kjønstad, and Garnet Kin-Lic Chan

    Yang Gao, Huanchen Zhai, Johnnie Gray, Ruojing Peng, Gunhee Park, Wen-Yuan Liu, Eirik F. Kjønstad, and Garnet Kin-Lic Chan. Fermionic tensor network contraction for arbitrary geometries, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.02215

    2024

  26. [35]

    Fermionic tensor network methods, 2024

    Quinten Mortier, Lukas Devos, Lander Burgelman, Bram Vanhecke, Nick Bultinck, Frank Verstraete, Jutho Haegeman, and Laurens Vanderstraeten. Fermionic tensor network methods, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.14611

    2024 arXiv

  27. [36]

    Shukla, Tyler D

    Sujeet K. Shukla, Tyler D. Ellison, and Lukasz Fidkowski. Tensor network approach to two-dimensional bosonization. Physical Review B, 101 0 (15), April 2020. ISSN 2469-9969. doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.155105. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.155105

    2020 doi

  28. [37]

    Hastings and Jeongwan Haah

    Matthew B. Hastings and Jeongwan Haah. Dynamically generated logical qubits. Quantum, 5: 0 564, October 2021. ISSN 2521-327X. doi:10.22331/q-2021-10-19-564. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.22331/q-2021-10-19-564

    2021 doi

  29. [38]

    Floquet codes without parent subsystem codes

    Margarita Davydova, Nathanan Tantivasadakarn, and Shankar Balasubramanian. Floquet codes without parent subsystem codes. PRX Quantum, 4 0 (2), June 2023. ISSN 2691-3399. doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.020341. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.020341

    2023 doi

  30. [39]

    Kesselring, Julio C

    Markus S. Kesselring, Julio C. Magdalena de la Fuente, Felix Thomsen, Jens Eisert, Stephen D. Bartlett, and Benjamin J. Brown. Anyon condensation and the color code. PRX Quantum, 5 0 (1), March 2024. ISSN 2691-3399. doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.010342. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.110...

    2024 doi

  31. [40]

    The x+y floquet code: A simple example for topological quantum computation in the path integral approach, 2025 a

    Andreas Bauer. The x+y floquet code: A simple example for topological quantum computation in the path integral approach, 2025 a . URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.07265

    2025 arXiv

  32. [41]

    Topological quantum computation assisted by phase transitions, 2023

    Yuanjie Ren and Peter Shor. Topological quantum computation assisted by phase transitions, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.00103

    2023 arXiv

  33. [42]

    A diagrammatic calculus of fermionic quantum circuits

    Giovanni de Felice, Amar Hadzihasanovic, and Kang Feng Ng. A diagrammatic calculus of fermionic quantum circuits. Logical Methods in Computer Science, 15 0 (3): 0 lmcs:5143, September 2019. doi:10.23638/LMCS-15(3:26)2019. URL https://doi.org/10.23638/LMCS-15(3:26)2019

    2019 doi

  34. [43]

    Zhengwei Liu, Alex Wozniakowski, and Arthur M. Jaffe. Quon 3d language for quantum information. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114 0 (10): 0 2497–2502, February 2017. ISSN 1091-6490. doi:10.1073/pnas.1621345114. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1621345114

    2017 doi

  35. [44]

    2d quon language: Unifying framework for cliffords, matchgates, and beyond, 2025

    Byungmin Kang, Chen Zhao, Zhengwei Liu, Xun Gao, and Soonwon Choi. 2d quon language: Unifying framework for cliffords, matchgates, and beyond, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06336

    2025 arXiv

  36. [45]

    Quon classical simulation: Unifying clifford, matchgates and entanglement, 2025

    Zixuan Feng, Zhengwei Liu, Fan Lu, and Ningfeng Wang. Quon classical simulation: Unifying clifford, matchgates and entanglement, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.07804

    2025 arXiv

  37. [46]

    Bauer, J

    A. Bauer, J. Eisert, and C. Wille. A unified diagrammatic approach to topological fixed point models. SciPost Phys. Core, 5: 0 38, 2022. doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.5.3.038

    2022 doi

  38. [47]

    Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond

    Alexei Kitaev. Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond. Annals of Physics, 321 0 (1): 0 2–111, January 2006. ISSN 0003-4916. doi:10.1016/j.aop.2005.10.005. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2005.10.005

    2006 doi

  39. [48]

    Unpaired majorana fermions in quantum wires

    A Yu Kitaev. Unpaired majorana fermions in quantum wires. Physics-Uspekhi, 44 0 (10S): 0 131, oct 2001. doi:10.1070/1063-7869/44/10S/S29. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1070/1063-7869/44/10S/S29

    2001 doi

  40. [49]

    Bauer and S

    A. Bauer and S. Lloyd. Quadratic tensors and the unification of clifford, gaussian, and free-fermion physics, 2025

    2025

  41. [50]

    Compact fermion to qubit mappings

    Charles Derby, Joel Klassen, Johannes Bausch, and Toby Cubitt. Compact fermion to qubit mappings. Phys. Rev. B, 104: 0 035118, Jul 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.104.035118. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.035118

    2021 doi

  42. [51]

    Landahl and Benjamin C

    Andrew J. Landahl and Benjamin C. A. Morrison. Logical fermions for fault-tolerant quantum simulation, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.10280

    2023 arXiv

  43. [52]

    Exact bosonization in two spatial dimensions and a new class of lattice gauge theories

    Yu-An Chen, Anton Kapustin, and Đorđe Radičević. Exact bosonization in two spatial dimensions and a new class of lattice gauge theories. Annals of Physics, 393: 0 234–253, June 2018. ISSN 0003-4916. doi:10.1016/j.aop.2018.03.024. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2018.03.024

    2018 doi

  44. [53]

    Equivalence between fermion-to-qubit mappings in two spatial dimensions

    Yu-An Chen and Yijia Xu. Equivalence between fermion-to-qubit mappings in two spatial dimensions. PRX Quantum, 4 0 (1), March 2023. ISSN 2691-3399. doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.010326. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.010326

    2023 doi

  45. [54]

    Local jordan-wigner transformations and topological sectors on the torus

    Oliver O’Brien, Laurens Lootens, and Frank Verstraete. Local jordan-wigner transformations and topological sectors on the torus. Physical Review B, 111 0 (11), March 2025. ISSN 2469-9969. doi:10.1103/physrevb.111.115126. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.111.115126

    2025 doi

  46. [55]

    Bosonization in three spatial dimensions and a 2-form gauge theory

    Yu-An Chen and Anton Kapustin. Bosonization in three spatial dimensions and a 2-form gauge theory. Physical Review B, 100 0 (24), December 2019. ISSN 2469-9969. doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.245127. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.245127

    2019 doi

  47. [56]

    Hsieh, and Liang Fu

    Sagar Vijay, Timothy H. Hsieh, and Liang Fu. Majorana fermion surface code for universal quantum computation. Phys. Rev. X, 5: 0 041038, Dec 2015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.5.041038. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.5.041038

    2015 doi

  48. [57]

    Low-overhead non-clifford topological fault-tolerant circuits for all non-chiral abelian topological phases

    Andreas Bauer. Low-overhead non-clifford topological fault-tolerant circuits for all non-chiral abelian topological phases. Quantum 9, page 1673, 2025 b . doi:10.22331/q-2025-03-25-1673

    2025 doi

  49. [58]

    Magdalena de la Fuente, Mark Webster, Dominic J

    Margarita Davydova, Andreas Bauer, Julio C. Magdalena de la Fuente, Mark Webster, Dominic J. Williamson, and Benjamin J. Brown. Universal fault tolerant quantum computing in 2d without getting tied in knots, 2025

    2025

  50. [59]

    Magdalena de la Fuente

    Andreas Bauer and Julio C. Magdalena de la Fuente. Planar fault-tolerant circuits for non-clifford gates on the 2d color code, 2025

    2025

  51. [60]

    A note on the full counting statistics of paired fermions

    Israel Klich. A note on the full counting statistics of paired fermions. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2014 0 (11): 0 P11006, nov 2014. doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2014/11/P11006. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2014/11/P11006

    2014 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.