Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Rapid parameter estimation with the full symphony of compact binary mergers using meshfree approximation

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that meshfree radial-basis interpolation of the gravitational-wave likelihood, computed once on nodes inside a match-metric ellipsoid, gives unbiased parameter recovery for neutron-star–black-hole mergers at a small fractio

desk verdict The submission is two unrelated papers spliced together—the abstract promises a GW parameter-estimation method, the body is a math paper on scalar curvature—so there is nothing to review. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.04172 v1 pith:NT25T5NZ submitted 2025-08-06 gr-qc astro-ph.IMstat.APstat.CO

Abhishek Sharma , Lalit Pathak , Soumen Roy , Anand S. Sengupta This is my paper
classification gr-qcastro-ph.IMstat.APstat.CO
keywords gravitationalwavesparameterestimationmeshfreeinterpolationradialbasisfunctionsneutronstarblackholeBayesianinferenceconstant-matchmetricellipsoidhigher-ordermodes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Gravitational-wave parameter estimation is expensive because every likelihood call regenerates a waveform and computes its overlap with the data; longer in-band signals and higher-order modes make this worse. This paper tries to replace that per-step cost with a one-time meshfree likelihood interpolation using radial basis functions. Nodes are placed inside a constant-match metric ellipsoid in intrinsic parameter space, and the sampler runs in a rotated basis aligned with the ellipsoid's eigenvectors so the parameters are uncorrelated. The paper reports unbiased recovery of injected parameters for 100 simulated neutron-star–black-hole signals in current detector data, with cost reduced by up to an order of magnitude for the longest signal, and about a $10^4$-fold speed-up in a simplified third-generation detector study. If true, this would make full-waveform parameter estimation practical for large event catalogs and for next-generation detectors.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the meshfree likelihood interpolant: radial-basis functions fit to likelihood values at nodes placed inside a constant-match metric ellipsoid in intrinsic parameter space, then evaluated directly during sampling. The ellipsoid does the work of guaranteeing that the interpolation domain covers the region where templates resemble the signal; the rotated eigenbasis of the ellipsoid does the work of decorrelating parameters, so the sampler converges in fewer steps.

What would settle it

Take a simulated NSBH signal of the type described, compute the full posterior with the exact likelihood, and check how much posterior mass lies outside the constant-match metric ellipsoid used for interpolation; if a substantial fraction of high-likelihood samples falls outside, the interpolation domain cannot cover the posterior. Repeating the third-generation speed-up measurement with Earth's rotation included would also directly test whether the $10^4$-fold figure survives a more realistic setup.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the most costly step in Bayesian inference for compact-binary mergers—evaluating the likelihood by generating a waveform and computing its noise-weighted overlap with the data at every sampler step—can be replaced by a precomputed interpolation. Nodes are placed inside a constant-match metric ellipsoid, a region of intrinsic parameter space where templates remain within a fixed match of a reference waveform. During sampling the likelihood is evaluated directly from radial-basis-function interpolants, so no waveform is generated on the fly and no overlap integral is recomputed. Sampling in the ellipsoid's eigenbasis decorrelates the parameters and speeds convergence.

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes that a constant-match metric ellipsoid anchored at a reference point in intrinsic parameter space contains the high-likelihood region for a neutron-star–black-hole signal; if the real posterior spills outside that ellipsoid—especially for long low-frequency signals with higher-order modes—the precomputed interpolation nodes will miss it and the claimed unbiased recovery would fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For the longest-duration signals—the ones that dominate current computational costs—parameter estimation would cost up to an order of magnitude less, so more events could be analyzed at a fixed compute budget.
  • Because the interpolation bypasses on-the-fly waveform generation, the cost of each likelihood evaluation no longer scales with signal duration in the usual way; longer in-band signals and higher-order modes become less punishing.
  • The same framework is claimed to apply to symmetric compact binaries dominated by the quadrupole mode, so the speed-up would cover the bulk of binary-black-hole and binary-neutron-star sources, not just NSBH systems.
  • Near a third-generation detector network, the reported four-orders-of-magnitude speed-up would make full Bayesian parameter estimation nearly real-time, allowing source parameters to be available far sooner than with current methods.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The single-ellipsoid strategy is the part most likely to limit generality; a natural extension, not pursued in the paper, would be to recompute or expand the ellipsoid adaptively as sampling proceeds, which could extend the method to posteriors that are multimodal or far from the reference point.
  • Because the third-generation speed-up is computed with Earth's rotation neglected, that factor is best read as an upper bound; including rotation—which matters most for long low-frequency signals—will consume some of the gain.
  • The numerical claims are presented only at summary level, and the supplied manuscript text contains none of the analysis behind them; the reported speed-ups and the unbiased-recovery statement should therefore be treated as results stated by the authors rather than independently checkable from this document.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The submission consists of an abstract proposing a meshfree radial-basis-function interpolation framework for gravitational-wave parameter estimation (using the IMRPhenomXHM waveform, 100 simulated NSBH injections in LIGO-Virgo data, and speed-up claims including O(10^4) for Einstein Telescope), followed by a full text that is entirely different: a pure mathematics paper by Shuli Chen, 'Optimal decay constant for complete manifolds of positive scalar curvature with quadratic decay' (arXiv:2508.04173v2). The full text contains no mention of gravitational waves, interpolation, IMRPhenomXHM, LIGO/Virgo, Einstein Telescope, noise, or any of the simulations referenced in the abstract. Thus the manuscript as submitted provides no methodological derivation, no experimental setup, no results, and no code to support any of the abstract's quantitative claims.

Significance. If the claimed framework existed and delivered unbiased recovery at the stated computational savings, it would be a practically important contribution to gravitational-wave parameter estimation, particularly for third-generation detectors. However, the supplied manuscript body is a differential-geometry paper with no connection to the abstract. Consequently, none of the claimed significance can be evaluated from the submitted text. The mismatch is not a matter of a questionable hidden assumption; it is a total absence of the claimed work.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract / Full text] The abstract's central claims—unbiased recovery on 100 simulated NSBH signals, up to an order-of-magnitude cost reduction, and an O(10^4) Einstein Telescope speed-up—have no corresponding analysis anywhere in the full text. The body is 'Optimal decay constant for complete manifolds of positive scalar curvature with quadratic decay' by Shuli Chen, with its own arXiv identifier (2508.04173v2). It contains no gravitational-wave content at all. This is a load-bearing absence: every quantitative claim in the abstract is unsupported by derivations, tables, figures, or reproducibility artifacts in the submitted manuscript.
  2. [Abstract / Full text] The methodological description in the abstract—interpolation nodes within a constant-match metric ellipsoid, radial basis function interpolation, eigenbasis rotation, and direct likelihood evaluation—appears nowhere in the full text. There is no equation, algorithm, or pseudo-code defining the metric ellipsoid, the kernel, the node placement, or the interpolation error control. The reader cannot assess the validity of the 'unbiased recovery' claim or the role of the listed free parameters (match threshold, kernel shape, node count, truncation rank).
  3. [Full text (all sections)] There are no experimental results in the manuscript: no injection-recovery plots, no posterior distributions, no convergence diagnostics, no computational-cost benchmarks, and no code repository. The abstract's mention of '100 simulated neutron-star-black-hole signals (NSBH) in LIGO-Virgo data' is therefore a statement without any accompanying evidence in the submitted document. For a methods paper whose main claims are empirical speed-ups and unbiasedness, this missing support is disqualifying.
  4. [Abstract (Einstein Telescope claim)] The only acknowledged simplification for the Einstein Telescope study—'the effects of Earth's rotation are neglected for simplicity'—appears in the abstract, but the ET study itself is absent from the full text. Consequently, even this explicitly stated limitation cannot be weighed against any data; the O(10^4) speed-up figure is unverifiable.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Title and metadata] The arXiv identifier in the supplied header (2508.04173v2) does not match the claimed paper identifier (2508.04172). This suggests a packaging or cross-listing error, but as submitted, the manuscript's title, abstract, and body are inconsistent.
  2. [References] The reference list in the full text is entirely for the differential-geometry paper and contains no citations to gravitational-wave data analysis, waveform modeling, or interpolation literature. This further confirms that the body is not the claimed paper.
  3. [Scope] If the full-text mathematical paper were to be considered independently, it would fall outside the scope of a gr-qc journal. The submitted version cannot be evaluated as a gravitational-wave physics manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular step identifiable: the abstract's gravitational-wave claims and the full text are disjoint, so there is no derivation chain to reduce.

full rationale

The submitted manuscript's abstract describes a meshfree likelihood-interpolation framework for gravitational-wave parameter estimation (IMRPhenomXHM, NSBH signals, Einstein Telescope speed-ups), but the full text supplied is a pure mathematics paper, 'OPTIMAL DECAY CONSTANT FOR COMPLETE MANIFOLDS OF POSITIVE SCALAR CURVATURE WITH QUADRATIC DECAY' by Shuli Chen, with no mention of the waveform model, radial basis functions, LIGO/Virgo, or the 100-signal simulation. There is therefore no derivation chain in which a 'prediction' can be shown to reduce by construction to its inputs, nor is any load-bearing self-citation visible. The abstract's quantitative claims are unsupported by the supplied body—a serious completeness/evidence failure—but unsupported claims are not, by themselves, circularity under the provided rubric. Within the mathematical full text, the cited tools (e.g., Brendle–Marques–Neves [3], Schoen–Yau [27]) appear to be external results, and no equation is exhibited that equals its own input. Accordingly, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The abstract's claims depend on unstated computational hyperparameters (match threshold, kernel shape, node count, eigenbasis truncation) and on modeling assumptions about whether a reference-point metric ellipsoid and smooth interpolation represent the true likelihood surface across mass, spin, and higher-order-mode content. The Einstein Telescope result invokes an explicitly admitted simplification (neglect of Earth's rotation). The 100-signal injection set is presented as evidence of unbiased recovery without any description of its coverage, which is an assumption about representativeness. No invented physical entities are involved.

free parameters (4)
  • constant-match threshold for the metric ellipsoid = not stated in abstract
    Determines how far interpolation nodes extend in intrinsic parameter space; no value is given in the abstract.
  • radial basis function kernel type and shape parameters = not stated in abstract
    Interpolation accuracy and smoothness depend on the kernel choice and width; unspecified.
  • number of interpolation nodes = not stated in abstract
    Node count sets the accuracy versus start-up cost trade-off of the start-up stage; unspecified.
  • eigenbasis truncation rank = not stated in abstract
    Rotated sampling assumes the metric eigenbasis is truncated or all directions are retained; the effective dimension is unstated.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption A constant-match metric ellipsoid computed at a reference point contains the effective support of the posterior in the intrinsic parameter space.
    Invoked in the abstract's node-placement description; if the metric is a poor global approximation (for example with higher-order modes or long in-band signals), nodes will miss high-likelihood regions.
  • domain assumption The likelihood surface is smooth enough over the ellipsoid that radial-basis-function interpolation introduces negligible error.
    This is the core bet of replacing on-the-fly waveform generation with precomputed interpolants, stated in the abstract; it is unverified in the provided text.
  • ad hoc to paper Earth's rotation can be neglected for the Einstein Telescope demonstration.
    The abstract explicitly says 'the effects of Earth's rotation are neglected for simplicity'; this admitted simplification affects the O(10^4) speed-up claim.
  • domain assumption The 100 simulated NSBH signals are representative of the source population for which unbiased recovery is claimed.
    The unbiased-recovery claim generalizes from an injection set whose coverage of mass ratio, spin, and distance is not described.
  • standard math Standard Bayesian inference and overlap-integral computations used as the baseline are correct references.
    The framework is benchmarked against standard inference; the correctness of that baseline and of the IMRPhenomXHM model is presumed from the literature and not stated in the supplied text.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Rapid parameter estimation with the full symphony of compact binary mergers using meshfree approximation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NT25T5NZ

@misc{pith2026250804172,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Rapid parameter estimation with the full symphony of compact binary mergers using meshfree approximation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NT25T5NZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.04172}
}
read the original abstract

We present a fast Bayesian inference framework to address the growing computational cost of gravitational-wave parameter estimation. The increased cost is driven by improved broadband detector sensitivity, particularly at low frequencies due to advances in detector commissioning, resulting in longer in-band signals and a higher detection rate. Waveform models now incorporate features like higher-order modes, further increasing the complexity of standard inference methods. Our framework employs meshfree likelihood interpolation with radial basis functions to accelerate Bayesian inference using the IMRPhenomXHM waveform model that incorporates higher modes of the gravitational-wave signal. In the initial start-up stage, interpolation nodes are placed within a constant-match metric ellipsoid in the intrinsic parameter space. During sampling, likelihood is evaluated directly using the precomputed interpolants, bypassing the costly steps of on-the-fly waveform generation and overlap-integral computation. We improve efficiency by sampling in a rotated parameter space aligned with the eigenbasis of the metric ellipsoid, where parameters are uncorrelated by construction. This speeds up sampler convergence. This method yields unbiased parameter recovery when applied to 100 simulated neutron-star-black-hole signals (NSBH) in LIGO-Virgo data, while reducing computational cost by up to an order of magnitude for the longest-duration signal. The meshfree framework equally applies to symmetric compact binary systems dominated by the quadrupole mode, supporting parameter estimation across a broad range of sources. Applied to a simulated NSBH signal in Einstein Telescope data, where the effects of Earth's rotation are neglected for simplicity, our method achieves an O(10^4) speed-up, demonstrating its potential use in the third-generation (3G) era.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Ab Initio Real-Time Gravitational-Wave Parameter Estimation

    gr-qc 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Slice-within-Gibbs nested sampling on modern GPUs delivers well-calibrated BNS parameter estimation in ~12 minutes uncompressed and ~89 seconds with heterodyning, from cold priors.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    On the other hand, the existence of positive scalar curvature can still place strong topological constraints on the underlying topology

    Introduction The scalar curvature R, defined as the average of the sectional curva- tures up to a multiplicative constant, is the weakest curvature invariant of a Riemannian metric. On the other hand, the existence of positive scalar curvature can still place strong topological constraints on the underlying topology. In the study of three-dimensional mani...

    arXiv 2020

  2. [2]

    Ricci flow on open 3– manifolds and positive scalar curvature

    Laurent Bessi` eres, G´ erard Besson, and Sylvain Maillot. Ricci flow on open 3– manifolds and positive scalar curvature. Geom. Topol., 15(2):927–975, 2011

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    For 3 ≤ n ≤ 7, consider (M, g), a Riemannian n-manifold with boundary

    Exhaustion via µ-bubbles We first recall general existence and stability results for µ-bubbles. For 3 ≤ n ≤ 7, consider (M, g), a Riemannian n-manifold with boundary. Assume that ∂M = ∂−M ∪ ∂+M is a labeling of the boundary components so that each of the sets ∂±M is non-empty. Fix a smooth function h on ˚M with h → ±∞on ∂±M . Choose a Caccioppoli set Ω 0 ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    When n ≥ 4 we observe that 2(n − 2) n − 3 ≥ 1 so using |DΣ1ψ|2 ≥ 0 we find that � Σ1 2(n − 2) n − 3 |DΣ1ψ|2 + 1 2 RΣ1ψ2 > 0, i.e

    = � Σ′ 1 KΣ1 > 0, so Σ′ 1 is a sphere and thus admits positive scalar curvature. When n ≥ 4 we observe that 2(n − 2) n − 3 ≥ 1 so using |DΣ1ψ|2 ≥ 0 we find that � Σ1 2(n − 2) n − 3 |DΣ1ψ|2 + 1 2 RΣ1ψ2 > 0, i.e. the conformal Laplacian LΣ1 := − 4(n − 2) n − 3 ∆Σ1 + RΣ1 is a positive operator (e.g. all eigenvalues are positive). Letting u >0 denote the firs...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Marques, and Andre Neves

    Simon Brendle, Fernando C. Marques, and Andre Neves. Deformations of the hemi- sphere that increase scalar curvature. Invent. Math. , 185(1):175–197, 2011

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    Taming 3-manifolds using scalar curvature

    Stanley Chang, Shmuel Weinberger, and Guoliang Yu. Taming 3-manifolds using scalar curvature. Geom. Dedicata, 148(1):3–14, 2010

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    A generalization of the Geroch conjecture with arbitrary ends

    Shuli Chen. A generalization of the Geroch conjecture with arbitrary ends. Math. Ann., 389:489–513, 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Positive scalar curvature metrics and aspherical summands

    Shuli Chen, Jianchun Chu, and Jintian Zhu. Positive scalar curvature metrics and aspherical summands. �������������������������������� , 2023

    work page 2023

Show all 33 references
  1. [9]

    Generalized soap bubbles and the topology of manifolds with positive scalar curvature

    Otis Chodosh and Chao Li. Generalized soap bubbles and the topology of manifolds with positive scalar curvature. Ann. of Math. (2) , 199(2):707–740, 2024

    2024

  2. [10]

    Classifying sufficiently connected psc manifolds in 4 and 5 dimensions

    Otis Chodosh, Chao Li, and Yevgeny Liokumovich. Classifying sufficiently connected psc manifolds in 4 and 5 dimensions. Geom. Topol., 27(4):1635–1655, 2023

    2023

  3. [11]

    Complete Riemannian 4- manifolds with uniformly positive scalar curvature

    Otis Chodosh, Davi Maximo, and Anubhav Mukherjee. Complete Riemannian 4- manifolds with uniformly positive scalar curvature. ��������������������������� ����� , 2024

    2024

  4. [12]

    A metric approach to the study of manifolds of positive scalar curvature

    Teo Gil Moreno de Mora Sard` a. A metric approach to the study of manifolds of positive scalar curvature . Unpublished PhD thesis, Universit´ e Paris-Est Cr´ eteil and Universitat Aut` onoma de Barcelona, 2025

    2025

  5. [13]

    C ∞ approximations of convex, subharmonic, and plurisubharmonic functions

    Robert E Greene and H Wu. C ∞ approximations of convex, subharmonic, and plurisubharmonic functions. Ann. Sci. ´Ecole Norm. Sup. , 12(1):47–84, 1979

    1979

  6. [14]

    Positive curvature, macroscopic dimension, spectral gaps and higher signatures

    Mikhael Gromov. Positive curvature, macroscopic dimension, spectral gaps and higher signatures. In Functional Analysis on the Eve of the 21st Century Volume II , pages 1–213. Springer, 1996

    1996

  7. [15]

    The classification of simply connected man- ifolds of positive scalar curvature

    Mikhael Gromov and H Blaine Lawson. The classification of simply connected man- ifolds of positive scalar curvature. Ann. of Math. (2) , 111(3):423–434, 1980

    1980

  8. [16]

    Spin and scalar curvature in the presence of a fundamental group

    Mikhael Gromov and H Blaine Lawson Jr. Spin and scalar curvature in the presence of a fundamental group. I. Ann. Math. (2) , pages 209–230, 1980

    1980

  9. [17]

    Positive scalar curvature and the dirac operator on complete riemannian manifolds

    Mikhael Gromov and H Blaine Lawson Jr. Positive scalar curvature and the dirac operator on complete riemannian manifolds. Publications Math´ ematiques de l’IH´ES, 58:83–196, 1983

    1983

  10. [18]

    Metric inequalities with scalar curvature

    Misha Gromov. Metric inequalities with scalar curvature. Geom. Funct. Anal. , 28(3):645–726, 2018

    2018

  11. [19]

    Four Lectures on Scalar Curvature , chapter 1, pages 1–514

    Misha Gromov. Four Lectures on Scalar Curvature , chapter 1, pages 1–514. World Sci. Publ., Hackensack, NJ, 2023

    2023

  12. [20]

    Geschlossene fl¨ achen in dreidimensionalen mannigfaltigkeiten

    Hellmuth Kneser. Geschlossene fl¨ achen in dreidimensionalen mannigfaltigkeiten. Jahresber. Deutsch.Math.-Verein., 38:248–259, 1929

    1929

  13. [21]

    Some open 3–manifolds and 3–orbifolds without locally finite canon- ical decompositions

    Sylvain Maillot. Some open 3–manifolds and 3–orbifolds without locally finite canon- ical decompositions. Algebr. Geom. Topol., 8(3):1795–1810, 2008

    2008

  14. [22]

    Positive mass theorem on manifolds admitting corners along a hyper- surface

    Pengzi Miao. Positive mass theorem on manifolds admitting corners along a hyper- surface. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. , 6(3):1163–1182, 2002

    2002

  15. [23]

    A unique decomposition theorem for 3-manifolds

    John Milnor. A unique decomposition theorem for 3-manifolds. Amer. J. of Math. , 84(1):1–7, 1962

    1962

  16. [24]

    The entropy formula for the Ricci flow and its geometric applica- tions

    Grisha Perelman. The entropy formula for the Ricci flow and its geometric applica- tions. ���������������������������������� , 2002

    2002

  17. [25]

    Finite extinction time for the solutions to the Ricci flow on certain three-manifolds

    Grisha Perelman. Finite extinction time for the solutions to the Ricci flow on certain three-manifolds. ���������������������������������� , 2003

    2003

  18. [26]

    Ricci flow with surgery on three-manifolds

    Grisha Perelman. Ricci flow with surgery on three-manifolds. ������������������ ���������������� , 2003

    2003

  19. [27]

    William T. Reid. Riccati Differential Equations, volume 86 of Mathematics in Science and Engineering. Academic Press, 1972. 14 SHULI CHEN

    1972

  20. [28]

    Existence of incompressible minimal surfaces and the topology of three dimensional manifolds with non-negative scalar curvature

    Richard Schoen and Shing-Tung Yau. Existence of incompressible minimal surfaces and the topology of three dimensional manifolds with non-negative scalar curvature. Ann. of Math. (2) , 110(1):127–142, 1979

    1979

  21. [29]

    On the structure of manifolds with positive scalar curvature

    Richard Schoen and Shing-Tung Yau. On the structure of manifolds with positive scalar curvature. Manuscripta Math. , 28(1):159–183, 1979

    1979

  22. [30]

    Fundamental groups of non-compact 3-manifolds

    Peter Scott. Fundamental groups of non-compact 3-manifolds. Proc. London Math. Soc., 3(2):303–326, 1977

    1977

  23. [31]

    Positive curvature conditions on contractible manifolds

    Paul Sweeney, Jr. Positive curvature conditions on contractible manifolds. ������ �������������������������� , 2025

    2025

  24. [32]

    Topology of 3-manifolds with uniformly positive scalar curvature

    Jian Wang. Topology of 3-manifolds with uniformly positive scalar curvature. ������ �������������������������� , 2022

    2022

  25. [33]

    Width estimate and doubly warped product

    Jintian Zhu. Width estimate and doubly warped product. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 374(2):1497–1511, 2021. (Shuli Chen) Department of Mathematics, University of Chicago, 5734 S Uni- versity A ve, Chicago IL, 60637, United States Email address : ����������������������

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.