Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 9 cited by

Physical properties of galaxies and the UV Luminosity Function from $z\sim6$ to $z\sim14$ in COSMOS-Web

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read COSMOS-Web's 3,099 dropout-selected galaxies yield a rest-frame UV luminosity function from $z\sim6$ to $z\sim14$ whose bright end ($M_{\rm UV}<-21$ mag) exceeds evolving Schechter-function predictions starting at $z\sim9$.

desk verdict The COSMOS-Web UVLF paper has the right data and a plausible headline, but the case for a growing bright-end excess at z~12 is not made at the abstract level—the completeness and contamination control would need to be in the body, and I couldn't read the body in this copy. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.04791 v1 pith:MAYCZL6X submitted 2025-08-06 astro-ph.GA

Maximilien Franco , Caitlin M. Casey , Hollis B. Akins , Olivier Ilbert , Marko Shuntov , Steven L. Finkelstein , Louise Paquereau , Andreas L. Faisst
show 32 more authors
Anton M. Koekemoer Michaela Hirschmann Sebastiano Cantarella Nicole E. Drakos Stephen M. Wilkins Henry Joy McCracken Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe Claudia Maraston Fatemeh Abedini Mark J. Achenbach Rafael C. Arango-Toro Fabrizio Gentile Ghassem Gozaliasl Kohei Inayoshi Darshan Kakkad Atousa Kalantari Ali Ahmad Khostovan Vasily Kokorev Erini Lambrides Gavin Leroy Richard Massey Bahram Mobasher Sophie L. Newman Jason Rhodes R. Michael Rich Brant E. Robertson David B. Sanders Takumi S. Tanaka Aswin P. Vijayan John R. Weaver Lilan Yang Si-Yue Yu
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords UVluminosityfunctionhigh-redshiftgalaxiesdropoutselectionJWSTCOSMOS-Webstarformationdustattenuationreionization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using 3,099 dropout-selected galaxies from the JWST COSMOS-Web survey, this paper measures the rest-frame ultraviolet luminosity function (UVLF) from $z\sim6$ to $z\sim14$. The galaxies show rapid star formation and blue stellar populations, and the median UV spectral slope $\beta$ stops evolving at $z>8$, which the authors read as minimal dust or spatially separated dust and star formation. The central claim is an excess of bright galaxies ($M_{\rm UV}<-21$ mag) compared with pre-JWST empirical results and with an evolving Schechter function, starting near $z\sim9$ and growing stronger toward $z\sim12$. If the claim holds, the early universe produced luminous galaxies more efficiently than standard extrapolations allow, requiring high star-formation efficiency, moderate stochasticity in luminosity, and low dust attenuation.

What carries the argument

The rest-frame ultraviolet luminosity function (UVLF), the comoving number density of galaxies per unit absolute UV magnitude, is the central object. It is measured using the dropout technique in HST/ACS F814W and JWST/NIRCam F115W and F150W, then compared with an evolving Schechter function—the standard parametric shape with a characteristic magnitude $M^*$, normalization $\phi^*$, and faint-end slope $\alpha$. The UV spectral slope $\beta$ is the supporting diagnostic: its non-evolution at $z>8$ is what lets the authors attribute the bright excess to dust-free, efficiently star-forming galaxies rather than obscured systems.

What would settle it

Take spectra or very deep multi-band photometry of the brightest $z\sim9$-$12$ dropout candidates, specifically those with $M_{\rm UV}<-21$ mag. If a substantial fraction turn out to be lower-redshift interlopers, such as dusty star-forming galaxies at $z\sim3$-$6$, the bright-end excess is an artifact of selection; if they confirm at the dropout redshifts, the excess is physical.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's discovery is a measured UVLF in three redshift bins spanning $z\sim5.5$-$14$, built from 3,099 galaxies selected as F814W, F115W, and F150W dropouts. The bright end of the UVLF, at $M_{\rm UV}<-21$ mag, sits above the expectations of a Schechter function whose parameters evolve smoothly with redshift, with the offset emerging at $z\sim9$ and becoming more pronounced by $z\sim12$. The same galaxies are forming stars rapidly with blue stellar populations, and their median UV slope $\beta$ does not evolve above $z\sim8$, implying little dust attenuation. The authors argue that reproducing the bright-end abundance needs elevated star-formation efficiencies, moderate stochasticity in

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the dropout-selected samples at $z>8$ are complete and nearly free of lower-redshift interlopers; if interlopers or completeness errors leak into the bright bins, the claimed excess at $z\sim9$-$12$ would shrink or disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At $z\sim9$-$12$, the measured bright-end counts exceed what a smoothly evolving Schechter function predicts, so models of early galaxy formation must include an additional channel for UV-bright, dust-poor galaxies.
  • Elevated star-formation efficiency, moderate stochasticity in galaxy luminosities, and minimal dust attenuation are the combined ingredients the authors say are needed to match the abundance.
  • The non-evolving median $\beta$ at $z>8$ implies that dust either accumulates later in cosmic time or is physically separated from the star-forming regions of the earliest galaxies.
  • The UVLF measurements provide a direct empirical anchor for estimating the ionizing-photon budget during reionization.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The strongest excess sits at $z\sim12$, exactly where F115W/F150W dropout selection is most vulnerable to photometric-redshift outliers; without the contamination and completeness fractions, the growth of the excess remains provisional.
  • Submillimeter follow-up of the bright $z>9$ candidates would test the low-dust interpretation: true blue, dust-poor populations should show little dust continuum, while hidden dust would mean the flat $\beta$ trend is a selection artifact.
  • If the excess survives, the bright end of the UVLF may require a double power-law shape rather than a Schechter function, pointing to a distinct population of extremely luminous, unobscured galaxies in the first half-billion years.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper uses COSMOS-Web NIRCam and HST data to measure the rest-frame ultraviolet luminosity function (UVLF) in three redshift bins from z~5.5 to z~14, selecting 3099 dropout galaxies via F814W, F115W, and F150W dropouts. The central observational claims are (i) the median UV spectral slope beta does not evolve at z>8, implying minimal dust or separated dust/star formation, and (ii) the bright-end UVLF (M_UV<-21 mag) shows an excess over an evolving Schechter-function baseline beginning at z~9 and growing toward z~12. The paper interprets these results as requiring elevated star-formation efficiency, moderate luminosity stochasticity, and minimal dust attenuation in the early universe.

Significance. If the selection corrections are robust, the sample size (3099 galaxies) and luminosity range (M_UV from about -19 to -22.5 mag) make this a valuable addition to the JWST high-redshift UVLF literature. The bright-end excess at z~9-12 is an important, falsifiable result, and the non-evolving beta would challenge simple dust-evolution models. The UVLF measurements themselves are independent data products, not derived from the forward model, so I do not see the circularity concern as applying to the primary measurements; it applies mainly to the final interpretive step. However, the headline claims sit precisely where dropout selection, photometric-redshift contamination, and Eddington bias are largest, so the evidence as presented is not yet conclusive.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract (sample selection)] The central claim of a growing bright-end excess at z~9-12 is not supported by the selection-function information supplied. The abstract gives the dropout filters and galaxy counts but no contamination fraction, no photometric-redshift outlier rate, and no completeness model for the individual redshift bins. At z~12, the F115W/F150W dropout window is narrow, and dusty or red lower-redshift interlopers, or photometric scatter near the detection limit, can preferentially populate the brightest M_UV bins. The authors should report the number of galaxies per bin, the estimated interloper fraction as a function of M_UV, and show through injection-recovery simulations that the excess survives worst-case completeness and contamination corrections. Without this, the trend of the excess beginning at z~9 and increasing toward z~12 is not established.
  2. [Abstract (beta result)] The claim that the median UV spectral slope beta does not evolve at z>8 needs an explicit selection-bias analysis. Dropout selections are beta-dependent: if bluer, actively star-forming galaxies are preferentially selected in the highest-redshift bins, an intrinsically evolving beta distribution could appear as a constant observed median. The paper should quantify the selection function in beta (for example, the recovered fraction of injected sources as a function of beta, M_UV, and redshift) and show that the beta measurements are not dominated by how non-detections in the dropout bands are treated. Otherwise the physical interpretation of minimal dust is premature.
  3. [Abstract (final sentence)] The statement that reproducing the observed abundance 'requires a combination of physical processes' overstates what is demonstrated by a forward model whose main knobs (star-formation efficiency, luminosity stochasticity, dust attenuation) are free parameters. The reader cannot assess uniqueness or degeneracy from the abstract-level description. I recommend softening the wording to 'can be reproduced by' and adding a sensitivity analysis showing the allowed parameter space and the extent to which each physical mechanism is actually required by the UVLF data.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract / Section 1] Define M_UV and beta at first use and state explicitly the redshift bin edges (e.g., which z ranges correspond to the three bins between z~5.5 and z~14), rather than only giving approximate central values.
  2. [Results (comparison baseline)] When comparing with 'pre-JWST empirical results and theoretical predictions of an evolving Schechter function,' specify the references and the adopted Schechter parameters; the claimed excess depends directly on the chosen baseline, and the baseline uncertainty should be shown.
  3. [Figures (UVLF)] Report error bars as statistical plus systematic in all UVLF figures, and indicate how many galaxies contribute to each bright bin, particularly at z~12 where the excess is strongest and the bin counts are likely small.
  4. [General] The text of the manuscript I received has extensive character corruption, making several tables and equations unreadable. If this reflects the submitted version, the file should be regenerated; if it is an artifact of my copy, please disregard this comment.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity identified: the UVLF measurements are independent data products and the interpretive 'requires' statement is a post-hoc explanation, not a derivation from fitted inputs.

full rationale

The available text (abstract and garbled body) presents UVLF measurements from dropout-selected samples as the primary result, compared externally to pre-JWST empirical results and evolving Schechter-function predictions. The abstract states that reproducing the observed abundance 'requires a combination of physical processes, including elevated star formation efficiencies, moderate levels of stochasticity in galaxy luminosities, and minimal dust attenuation.' This is an interpretive conclusion about what physical knobs would be needed, not a circular derivation in which the predicted quantity is defined in terms of the fitted quantity. No equation, fitting procedure, or self-citation chain is visible in the readable portion that would make the UVLF points or the claimed excess equivalent to an input assumption. The absence of contamination/completeness details is a correctness/robustness concern, not circularity. Therefore the honest finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The UVLF measurement itself rests on photometric redshift reliability and completeness, a standard survey assumption that is especially fragile at the highest redshifts where the claimed excess is largest. The interpretation layer adds two further assumptions: that local calibrations of how UV colors track dust apply at z>8, and that the evolving Schechter function is the correct null model. The forward-model claim that high star formation efficiency, luminosity stochasticity, and minimal dust are 'required' introduces three free knobs fitted to match the measured counts; their fitted values and priors are not given in the abstract. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (4)
  • Reference Schechter function parameters (phi*, M*, alpha) defining the 'no excess' baseline = not reported in abstract
    The headline excess is defined as a deviation from 'pre-JWST empirical results and theoretical predictions of an evolving Schechter function'; the shape of that baseline is a modeling choice that determines the size and significance of the excess.
  • Star formation efficiency in the forward model = not reported in abstract
    Abstract states that reproducing the bright-end abundance requires 'elevated star formation efficiencies'; this is a knob tuned so the model matches the measured UVLF.
  • Luminosity stochasticity parameter = not reported in abstract
    Abstract states 'moderate levels of stochasticity in galaxy luminosities' are required; this scatter parameter is fitted to reproduce the bright-end counts.
  • Dust attenuation parameter (A_UV or IRX-beta normalization) = 'minimal' per abstract
    Abstract states 'minimal dust attenuation' is required; the dust level is a tuned input of the model, degenerate with assumptions about dust geometry.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Dropout-selected photometric redshifts at z>8 are reliable with low interloper contamination
    The entire sample rests on photo-z quality; the abstract reports dropout filters (F814W, F115W, F150W) but no contamination or photo-z outlier estimate, and interlopers would most inflate the bright-end bins where the excess is claimed to be strongest.
  • domain assumption The rest-frame UV spectral slope beta maps to dust content through locally calibrated relations at z>8
    The conclusion of 'minimal dust, or physical separation of dust and star formation' interprets non-evolving beta as a dust diagnostic; the IRX-beta calibration at z>8 is not established by this paper.
  • domain assumption An evolving Schechter function is the correct null model for defining the bright-end excess
    The central claim is an 'excess' relative to this functional form; a different baseline (e.g., a double power law) would change the magnitude and redshift onset of the claimed excess.
  • standard math Standard Lambda-CDM cosmology for converting observed magnitudes to luminosities and co-moving volumes
    UVLF volume densities and M_UV values depend on the assumed cosmology; standard practice taken from prior literature, not derived here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Physical properties of galaxies and the UV Luminosity Function from $z\sim6$ to $z\sim14$ in COSMOS-Web." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MAYCZL6X

@misc{pith2026250804791,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Physical properties of galaxies and the UV Luminosity Function from $z\sim6$ to $z\sim14$ in COSMOS-Web},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MAYCZL6X}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.04791}
}
abstract

We present measurements of the rest-frame ultraviolet luminosity function (UVLF) in three redshift bins over $z\sim5.5$-14 from the JWST COSMOS-Web survey. Our samples, selected using the dropout technique in the HST/ACS F814W, JWST/NIRCam F115W, and F150W filters, contain a total of 3099 galaxies spanning a wide luminosity range from faint ($M_{\rm UV}\sim-19$ mag) to bright ($M_{\rm UV}\sim-22.5$ mag). The galaxies are undergoing rapid star formation, with blue stellar populations. Surprisingly, their median UV spectral slope $\beta$ does not evolve at $z>8$, suggesting minimal dust, or physical separation of dust and star formation at early epochs. The measured UVLF exhibits an excess at the bright-end ($M_{\rm UV}<-21$ mag) compared to pre-JWST empirical results and theoretical predictions of an evolving Schechter function, with the excess beginning at $z\sim9$ and becoming increasingly prominent toward $z\sim12$. Our analysis suggests that reproducing the observed abundance of UV-bright galaxies at high redshift requires a combination of physical processes, including elevated star formation efficiencies, moderate levels of stochasticity in galaxy luminosities, and minimal dust attenuation.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 9 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MEGA and SMILES Find Fewer Dusty Galaxies than Expected at Cosmic Noon

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    JWST MIRI observations of 634 galaxies at 0.2<z<2 yield IR luminosity functions with faint-end slope α≈0.147, implying lower dust-obscured SFRD than previous ALMA/Herschel/Spitzer studies.

  2. Cosmological simulations of the high-redshift galaxy population adopting a variable stellar initial mass function

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A density-dependent top-heavy stellar IMF brightens z=10-15 galaxies by ~1-1.3 mag in the UV, easing the JWST bright-galaxy tension; extra dust from the massive stars offsets much of the boost by z=5.

  3. Investigating the star formation histories of galaxies from Cosmic Dawn to the Epoch of Reionization with the Santa Cruz SAM

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Ultra-high-z galaxies have median t50 ≲ 30 Myr and t90 ≲ 70 Myr—3–4× shorter than at z~6—with rising median SFHs but diverse individual histories, requiring refined young-star SED mapping for accurate UV luminosities.

  4. Assessing Ultra-Cool Dwarf Contamination in Photometrically Selected High-Redshift Galaxy Samples

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    FC-ENZO is a new modeling tool that predicts ultra-cool dwarf contamination fractions in high-z galaxy samples, finding similar overall levels across HST, Roman, and JWST but with magnitude-dependent differences and h...

  5. Assessing Ultra-Cool Dwarf Contamination in Photometrically Selected High-Redshift Galaxy Samples

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    FC-ENZO predicts UCD contamination in photometric high-z samples; T/early-Y dwarfs dominate at z~8, rates rise with metallicity and depend strongly on SED library and Galactic density model.

  6. Dust in the Average Galaxy: Attenuation, Emission, and Opacity from 0<z<7

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    UV/optical attenuation underpredicts IR luminosity by 3-10x across 0<z<7 while κ_UV/κ_FIR falls by over an order of magnitude, pointing to evolving dust grain properties in average galaxies.

  7. UV Luminosity Functions from HST and JWST: A Possible Resolution to the High-Redshift Galaxy Abundance Puzzle and Implications for Cosmic Strings

    astro-ph.CO 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Cosmic string loops can boost the high-z galaxy UV luminosity function enough to match HST+JWST data, yielding an upper bound Gμ ≲ 1e-8 (95% c.l.) that improves on CMB limits, but with strong prior/model dependence.

  8. The galaxy ultraviolet luminosity function from $z=7$ to $15$ in the COLIBRE simulations

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    COLIBRE simulations underpredict bright-end UV galaxy luminosities by 1 to 2.5 magnitudes at z=7-15 compared with observations, with the discrepancy persisting after dust attenuation and uncertainty accounting.

  9. Einstein-Cartan cosmology and the S8 problem

    physics.gen-ph 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    Einstein-Cartan cosmology predicts much larger mass density and sigma_8(z) at high redshifts than LCDM, making the S8 discrepancy between CMB and low-redshift data a natural outcome rather than a problem.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

213 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · cited by 8 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    Galaxy Formation and Reionization: Key Unknowns and Expected Breakthroughs by the James Webb Space Telescope

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    J., Conselice , C

    Adams , N. J., Conselice , C. J., Ferreira , L., et al. 2023, , 518, 4755, 10.1093/mnras/stac3347

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3347 2023

  5. [5]

    J., Conselice , C

    Adams , N. J., Conselice , C. J., Austin , D., et al. 2024, , 965, 169, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2a7b

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2a7b 2024

  6. [6]

    2022, , 74, 247, 10.1093/pasj/psab122

    Aihara , H., AlSayyad , Y., Ando , M., et al. 2022, , 74, 247, 10.1093/pasj/psab122

    doi:10.1093/pasj/psab122 2022

  7. [7]

    B., Casey , C

    Akins , H. B., Casey , C. M., Lambrides , E., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.10341, 10.48550/arXiv.2406.10341

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.10341 2024

  8. [8]

    2019, , 629, A9, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935594

    \'A lvarez-M \'a rquez , J., Colina , L., Marques-Chaves , R., et al. 2019, , 629, A9, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935594

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935594 2019

Show all 213 references
  1. [9]

    L., Teyssier , R., & Dekel , A

    Andalman , Z. L., Teyssier , R., & Dekel , A. 2025, , 540, 3350, 10.1093/mnras/staf930

    2025 doi

  2. [10]

    C., Ilbert , O., Ciesla , L., et al

    Arango-Toro , R. C., Ilbert , O., Ciesla , L., et al. 2025, , 696, A159, 10.1051/0004-6361/202452519

    2025 doi

  3. [11]

    1999, , 310, 540, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02978.x

    Arnouts , S., Cristiani , S., Moscardini , L., et al. 1999, , 310, 540, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02978.x

    1999

  4. [12]

    L., et al

    Arrabal Haro , P., Dickinson , M., Finkelstein , S. L., et al. 2023, , 622, 707, 10.1038/s41586-023-06521-7

    2023 doi

  5. [13]

    J., et al

    Atek , H., Labb \'e , I., Furtak , L. J., et al. 2024, , 626, 975, 10.1038/s41586-024-07043-6

    2024 doi

  6. [14]

    J., Adams , N

    Austin , D., Conselice , C. J., Adams , N. J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.10751, 10.48550/arXiv.2404.10751

    2024 doi arXiv

  7. [15]

    B., Finkelstein , S

    Bagley , M. B., Finkelstein , S. L., Koekemoer , A. M., et al. 2023, , 946, L12, 10.3847/2041-8213/acbb08

    2023 doi

  8. [16]

    Bakx , T. J. L. C., Tamura , Y., Hashimoto , T., et al. 2020, , 493, 4294, 10.1093/mnras/staa509

    2020 doi

  9. [17]

    2016, kbarbary/sep: v1.0.0 , v1.0.0, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.159035

    Barbary , K., Boone , K., McCully , C., et al. 2016, kbarbary/sep: v1.0.0 , v1.0.0, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.159035

    2016 doi

  10. [18]

    H., Fan , X., White , R

    Becker , R. H., Fan , X., White , R. L., et al. 2001, , 122, 2850, 10.1086/324231

    2001 doi

  11. [19]

    H., Hearin , A

    Behroozi , P., Wechsler , R. H., Hearin , A. P., & Conroy , C. 2019, , 488, 3143, 10.1093/mnras/stz1182

    2019 doi

  12. [20]

    A., Rieke , M., Eisenstein , D., et al

    Beichman , C. A., Rieke , M., Eisenstein , D., et al. 2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 8442, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2012: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave, ed. M. C. Clampin , G. G. Fazio , H. A. Mac...

    2012 doi

  13. [21]

    1996, , 117, 393, 10.1051/aas:1996164

    Bertin , E., & Arnouts , S. 1996, , 117, 393, 10.1051/aas:1996164

    1996 doi

  14. [22]

    2020, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Bertin , E., Schefer , M., Apostolakos , N., et al. 2020, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 527, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXIX, ed. R. Pizzo , E. R. Deul , J. D. Mol , J. de Plaa , & H. Verkouter , 461

    2020

  15. [23]

    K., Somerville , R

    Bhowmick , A. K., Somerville , R. S., Di Matteo , T., et al. 2020, , 496, 754, 10.1093/mnras/staa1605

    2020 doi

  16. [24]

    2019, , 622, A103, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834156

    Boquien , M., Burgarella , D., Roehlly , Y., et al. 2019, , 622, A103, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834156

    2019 doi

  17. [25]

    J., Illingworth , G

    Bouwens , R. J., Illingworth , G. D., Oesch , P. A., et al. 2010, , 708, L69, 10.1088/2041-8205/708/2/L69

    2010 doi

  18. [26]

    2012, , 752, L5, 10.1088/2041-8205/752/1/L5

    ---. 2012, , 752, L5, 10.1088/2041-8205/752/1/L5

    2012 doi

  19. [27]

    2014, , 793, 115, 10.1088/0004-637X/793/2/115

    ---. 2014, , 793, 115, 10.1088/0004-637X/793/2/115

    2014 doi

  20. [28]

    2015, , 803, 34, 10.1088/0004-637X/803/1/34

    ---. 2015, , 803, 34, 10.1088/0004-637X/803/1/34

    2015 doi

  21. [29]

    J., Oesch , P

    Bouwens , R. J., Oesch , P. A., Stefanon , M., et al. 2021, , 162, 47, 10.3847/1538-3881/abf83e

    2021 doi

  22. [30]

    Bowler , R. A. A., Jarvis , M. J., Dunlop , J. S., et al. 2020, , 493, 2059, 10.1093/mnras/staa313

    2020 doi

  23. [31]

    2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 657, 10.1038/s41550-024-02218-7

    Boyett , K., Trenti , M., Leethochawalit , N., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 657, 10.1038/s41550-024-02218-7

    2024 doi

  24. [32]

    2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 731, 10.1038/s41550-023-01937-7

    Boylan-Kolchin , M. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 731, 10.1038/s41550-023-01937-7

    2023 doi

  25. [33]

    2023, msaexp: NIRSpec analyis tools, 0.6.17, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.8319596

    Brammer, G. 2023, msaexp: NIRSpec analyis tools, 0.6.17, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.8319596

    2023 doi

  26. [34]

    B., van Dokkum , P

    Brammer , G. B., van Dokkum , P. G., & Coppi , P. 2008, , 686, 1503, 10.1086/591786

    2008 doi

  27. [35]

    2003, , 344, 1000, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x

    Bruzual , G., & Charlot , S. 2003, , 344, 1000, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x

    2003

  28. [37]

    J., Saxena , A., Cameron , A

    Bunker , A. J., Saxena , A., Cameron , A. J., et al. 2023, , 677, A88, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346159

    2023 doi

  29. [38]

    2023, JWST Calibration Pipeline , 1.9.4, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.7577320

    Bushouse , H., Eisenhamer , J., Dencheva , N., et al. 2023, JWST Calibration Pipeline , 1.9.4, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.7577320

    2023 doi

  30. [39]

    C., et al

    Calzetti , D., Armus , L., Bohlin , R. C., et al. 2000, , 533, 682, 10.1086/308692

    2000 doi

  31. [40]

    L., & Storchi-Bergmann , T

    Calzetti , D., Kinney , A. L., & Storchi-Bergmann , T. 1994, , 429, 582, 10.1086/174346

    1994 doi

  32. [41]

    2007, , 172, 99, 10.1086/519081

    Capak , P., Aussel , H., Ajiki , M., et al. 2007, , 172, 99, 10.1086/519081

    2007 doi

  33. [42]

    C., McLure , R

    Carnall , A. C., McLure , R. J., Dunlop , J. S., & Dav \'e , R. 2018, , 480, 4379, 10.1093/mnras/sty2169

    2018 doi

  34. [43]

    2024, , 633, 318, 10.1038/s41586-024-07860-9

    Carniani , S., Hainline , K., D'Eugenio , F., et al. 2024, , 633, 318, 10.1038/s41586-024-07860-9

    2024 doi

  35. [44]

    M., Kartaltepe , J

    Casey , C. M., Kartaltepe , J. S., Drakos , N. E., et al. 2023, , 954, 31, 10.3847/1538-4357/acc2bc

    2023 doi

  36. [45]

    M., Akins , H

    Casey , C. M., Akins , H. B., Shuntov , M., et al. 2024, , 965, 98, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2075

    2024 doi

  37. [46]

    2022, , 938, L15, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac94d0

    Castellano , M., Fontana , A., Treu , T., et al. 2022, , 938, L15, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac94d0

    2022 doi

  38. [47]

    2023, , 948, L14, 10.3847/2041-8213/accea5

    ---. 2023, , 948, L14, 10.3847/2041-8213/accea5

    2023 doi

  39. [48]

    2024, , 972, 143, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f88

    Castellano , M., Napolitano , L., Fontana , A., et al. 2024, , 972, 143, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f88

    2024 doi

  40. [49]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.05893, 10.48550/arXiv.2504.05893

    Castellano , M., Fontana , A., Merlin , E., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.05893, 10.48550/arXiv.2504.05893

    2025 doi

  41. [50]

    2003, , 115, 763, 10.1086/376392

    Chabrier , G. 2003, , 115, 763, 10.1086/376392

    2003 doi

  42. [51]

    G., Aubert , D., & Puchwein , E

    Chardin , J., Haehnelt , M. G., Aubert , D., & Puchwein , E. 2015, , 453, 2943, 10.1093/mnras/stv1786

    2015 doi

  43. [52]

    Charlot , S., & Fall , S. M. 2000, , 539, 718, 10.1086/309250

    2000 doi

  44. [53]

    2022, , 517, 5104, 10.1093/mnras/stac2874

    Chisholm , J., Saldana-Lopez , A., Flury , S., et al. 2022, , 517, 5104, 10.1093/mnras/stac2874

    2022 doi

  45. [54]

    2024, , 686, A128, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348091

    Ciesla , L., Elbaz , D., Ilbert , O., et al. 2024, , 686, A128, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348091

    2024 doi

  46. [55]

    W., Papovich , C., Finkelstein , S

    Cole , J. W., Papovich , C., Finkelstein , S. L., et al. 2025, , 979, 193, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9a6a

    2025 doi

  47. [56]

    J., Adams , N., Harvey , T., et al

    Conselice , C. J., Adams , N., Harvey , T., et al. 2025, , 983, 30, 10.3847/1538-4357/ada608

    2025 doi

  48. [57]

    A., Theuns , T., Dalla Vecchia , C., et al

    Crain , R. A., Theuns , T., Dalla Vecchia , C., et al. 2009, , 399, 1773, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15402.x

    2009

  49. [58]

    J., McLeod , D

    Cullen , F., McLure , R. J., McLeod , D. J., et al. 2023, , 520, 14, 10.1093/mnras/stad073

    2023 doi

  50. [59]

    J., McLure , R

    Cullen , F., McLeod , D. J., McLure , R. J., et al. 2024, , 531, 997, 10.1093/mnras/stae1211

    2024 doi

  51. [60]

    C., Scholte , D., et al

    Cullen , F., Carnall , A. C., Scholte , D., et al. 2025, , 10.1093/mnras/staf838

    2025 doi

  52. [61]

    2018, , 780, 1, 10.1016/j.physrep.2018.10.002

    Dayal , P., & Ferrara , A. 2018, , 780, 1, 10.1016/j.physrep.2018.10.002

    2018 doi

  53. [62]

    R., et al

    Dayal , P., Volonteri , M., Choudhury , T. R., et al. 2020, , 495, 3065, 10.1093/mnras/staa1138

    2020 doi

  54. [63]

    2022, , 512, 989, 10.1093/mnras/stac537

    Dayal , P., Ferrara , A., Sommovigo , L., et al. 2022, , 512, 989, 10.1093/mnras/stac537

    2022 doi

  55. [64]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.05948, 10.48550/arXiv.2409.05948

    de Graaff , A., Brammer , G., Weibel , A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.05948, 10.48550/arXiv.2409.05948

    2024 doi arXiv

  56. [65]

    2007, , 375, 2, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11287.x

    De Lucia , G., & Blaizot , J. 2007, , 375, 2, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11287.x

    2007

  57. [66]

    2024, , 687, A68, 10.1051/0004-6361/202349045

    De Lucia , G., Fontanot , F., Xie , L., & Hirschmann , M. 2024, , 687, A68, 10.1051/0004-6361/202349045

    2024 doi

  58. [67]

    C., Birnboim , Y., Mandelker , N., & Li , Z

    Dekel , A., Sarkar , K. C., Birnboim , Y., Mandelker , N., & Li , Z. 2023, , 523, 3201, 10.1093/mnras/stad1557

    2023 doi

  59. [68]

    T., Dunlop , J

    Donnan , C. T., Dunlop , J. S., McLure , R. J., McLeod , D. J., & Cullen , F. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.03217, 10.48550/arXiv.2501.03217

    2025 doi arXiv

  60. [69]

    T., McLeod , D

    Donnan , C. T., McLeod , D. J., Dunlop , J. S., et al. 2023, , 518, 6011, 10.1093/mnras/stac3472

    2023 doi

  61. [70]

    T., McLure , R

    Donnan , C. T., McLure , R. J., Dunlop , J. S., et al. 2024, , 533, 3222, 10.1093/mnras/stae2037

    2024 doi

  62. [71]

    E., Villasenor , B., Robertson , B

    Drakos , N. E., Villasenor , B., Robertson , B. E., et al. 2022, , 926, 194, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac46fb

    2022 doi

  63. [72]

    J., Willott , C., Alberts , S., et al

    Eisenstein , D. J., Willott , C., Alberts , S., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2306.02465, 10.48550/arXiv.2306.02465

    2023 doi arXiv

  64. [73]

    L., Capak , P

    Faisst , A. L., Capak , P. L., Yan , L., et al. 2017, , 847, 21, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa886c

    2017 doi

  65. [74]

    J., Chatzikos , M., Guzm \'a n , F., et al

    Ferland , G. J., Chatzikos , M., Guzm \'a n , F., et al. 2017, , 53, 385, 10.48550/arXiv.1705.10877

    2017 doi arXiv

  66. [75]

    2024, , 684, A207, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348321

    Ferrara , A. 2024, , 684, A207, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348321

    2024 doi

  67. [76]

    2023, , 522, 3986, 10.1093/mnras/stad1095

    Ferrara , A., Pallottini , A., & Dayal , P. 2023, , 522, 3986, 10.1093/mnras/stad1095

    2023 doi

  68. [77]

    2025, , 694, A286, 10.1051/0004-6361/202452707

    Ferrara , A., Pallottini , A., & Sommovigo , L. 2025, , 694, A286, 10.1051/0004-6361/202452707

    2025 doi

  69. [78]

    2022, , 512, 58, 10.1093/mnras/stac460

    Ferrara , A., Sommovigo , L., Dayal , P., et al. 2022, , 512, 58, 10.1093/mnras/stac460

    2022 doi

  70. [79]

    Finkelstein , S. L. 2016, , 33, e037, 10.1017/pasa.2016.26

    2016 doi

  71. [80]

    L., Papovich , C., Ryan , R

    Finkelstein , S. L., Papovich , C., Ryan , R. E., et al. 2012, , 758, 93, 10.1088/0004-637X/758/2/93

    2012 doi

  72. [81]

    L., D'Aloisio , A., Paardekooper , J.-P., et al

    Finkelstein , S. L., D'Aloisio , A., Paardekooper , J.-P., et al. 2019, , 879, 36, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1ea8

    2019 doi

  73. [82]

    L., Bagley , M

    Finkelstein , S. L., Bagley , M. B., Arrabal Haro , P., et al. 2022 a , , 940, L55, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac966e

    2022 doi

  74. [83]

    L., Bagley , M., Song , M., et al

    Finkelstein , S. L., Bagley , M., Song , M., et al. 2022 b , , 928, 52, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3aed

    2022 doi

  75. [84]

    L., Bagley , M

    Finkelstein , S. L., Bagley , M. B., Ferguson , H. C., et al. 2023, , 946, L13, 10.3847/2041-8213/acade4

    2023 doi

  76. [85]

    L., Leung , G

    Finkelstein , S. L., Leung , G. C. K., Bagley , M. B., et al. 2024, , 969, L2, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad4495

    2024 doi

  77. [86]

    2023, , 943, L27, 10.3847/2041-8213/acb5f2

    Fiore , F., Ferrara , A., Bischetti , M., Feruglio , C., & Travascio , A. 2023, , 943, L27, 10.3847/2041-8213/acb5f2

    2023 doi

  78. [87]

    W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J

    Foreman-Mackey , D., Hogg , D. W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J. 2013, , 125, 306, 10.1086/670067

    2013 doi

  79. [88]

    B., Casey , C

    Franco , M., Akins , H. B., Casey , C. M., et al. 2024, , 973, 23, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5e6a

    2024 doi

  80. [89]

    M., Koekemoer , A

    Franco , M., Casey , C. M., Koekemoer , A. M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.03256. 2506.03256

    2025 arXiv

  81. [90]

    J., Zitrin , A., Plat , A., et al

    Furtak , L. J., Zitrin , A., Plat , A., et al. 2023, , 952, 142, 10.3847/1538-4357/acdc9d

    2023 doi

  82. [91]

    Gaia Collaboration , Vallenari , A., Brown , A. G. A., et al. 2023, , 674, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

    2023 doi

  83. [92]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2502.02637, 10.48550/arXiv.2502.02637

    Gandolfi , G., Rodighiero , G., Bisigello , L., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2502.02637, 10.48550/arXiv.2502.02637

    2025 doi arXiv

  84. [93]

    2022, , 512, 4909, 10.1093/mnras/stac257

    Garaldi , E., Kannan , R., Smith , A., et al. 2022, , 512, 4909, 10.1093/mnras/stac257

    2022 doi

  85. [94]

    Gelli , V., Mason , C., & Hayward , C. C. 2024, , 975, 192, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7b36

    2024 doi

  86. [95]

    2018, , 613, A44, 10.1051/0004-6361/201732385

    Grazian , A., Giallongo , E., Boutsia , K., et al. 2018, , 613, A44, 10.1051/0004-6361/201732385

    2018 doi

  87. [96]

    2024, , 974, 84, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6980

    ---. 2024, , 974, 84, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6980

    2024 doi

  88. [97]

    Gumbel, E. J. 1958, Statistics of Extremes (New York Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press), doi:10.7312/gumb92958

    1958 doi

  89. [98]

    N., Helton , J

    Hainline , K. N., Helton , J. M., Johnson , B. D., et al. 2024, , 964, 66, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad20d1

    2024 doi

  90. [99]

    2024, , 960, 56, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0b7e

    Harikane , Y., Nakajima , K., Ouchi , M., et al. 2024, , 960, 56, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0b7e

    2024 doi

  91. [100]

    2023, , 265, 5, 10.3847/1538-4365/acaaa9

    Harikane , Y., Ouchi , M., Oguri , M., et al. 2023, , 265, 5, 10.3847/1538-4365/acaaa9

    2023 doi

  92. [101]

    K., Ellis , R

    Harikane , Y., Inoue , A. K., Ellis , R. S., et al. 2025, , 980, 138, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9b2c

    2025 doi

  93. [102]

    S., Liu , D., et al

    Harish , S., Kartaltepe , J. S., Liu , D., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.03306. 2506.03306

    2025 arXiv

  94. [103]

    2011, , 418, L20, 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01134.x

    Harrison , I., & Coles , P. 2011, , 418, L20, 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01134.x

    2011

  95. [104]

    H., & Haghi , H

    Haslbauer , M., Kroupa , P., Zonoozi , A. H., & Haghi , H. 2022, , 939, L31, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9a50

    2022 doi

  96. [105]

    E., Watson , D., Brammer , G., et al

    Heintz , K. E., Watson , D., Brammer , G., et al. 2024, Science, 384, 890, 10.1126/science.adj0343

    2024 doi

  97. [106]

    R., Dayal , P., et al

    Hutter , A., Cueto , E. R., Dayal , P., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.00730, 10.48550/arXiv.2410.00730

    2024 doi arXiv

  98. [107]

    J., et al

    Ilbert , O., Arnouts , S., McCracken , H. J., et al. 2006, , 457, 841, 10.1051/0004-6361:20065138

    2006 doi

  99. [108]

    K., Li , W., & Ho , L

    Inayoshi , K., Harikane , Y., Inoue , A. K., Li , W., & Ho , L. C. 2022, , 938, L10, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9310

    2022 doi

  100. [109]

    B., Jeon , M., Song , H., & Bromm , V

    Jeong , T. B., Jeon , M., Song , H., & Bromm , V. 2025, , 980, 10, 10.3847/1538-4357/ada27d

    2025 doi

  101. [110]

    2024, COSMOS-3D: A Legacy Spectroscopic/Imaging Survey of the Early Universe , JWST Proposal

    Kakiichi , K., Egami , E., Fan , X., et al. 2024, COSMOS-3D: A Legacy Spectroscopic/Imaging Survey of the Early Universe , JWST Proposal. Cycle 3, ID. \#5893

    2024

  102. [111]

    2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 511, 4005, 10.1093/mnras/stab3710

    Kannan, R., Garaldi, E., Smith, A., et al. 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 511, 4005, 10.1093/mnras/stab3710

    2021 doi

  103. [112]

    2022, , 514, 3857, 10.1093/mnras/stac1557

    Kannan , R., Smith , A., Garaldi , E., et al. 2022, , 514, 3857, 10.1093/mnras/stac1557

    2022 doi

  104. [113]

    2017, , 466, 4826, 10.1093/mnras/stx052

    Kimm , T., Katz , H., Haehnelt , M., et al. 2017, , 466, 4826, 10.1093/mnras/stx052

    2017 doi

  105. [114]

    D., Onoue , M., Inayoshi , K., et al

    Kocevski , D. D., Onoue , M., Inayoshi , K., et al. 2023, , 954, L4, 10.3847/2041-8213/ace5a0

    2023 doi

  106. [115]

    M., Aussel , H., Calzetti , D., et al

    Koekemoer , A. M., Aussel , H., Calzetti , D., et al. 2007, , 172, 196, 10.1086/520086

    2007 doi

  107. [116]

    A., Taylor , A

    Kokorev , V., Ch \'a vez Ortiz , \'O . A., Taylor , A. J., et al. 2025 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.12504, 10.48550/arXiv.2504.12504

    2025 doi arXiv

  108. [117]

    2025 b , , 983, L22, 10.3847/2041-8213/adc458

    Kokorev , V., Atek , H., Chisholm , J., et al. 2025 b , , 983, L22, 10.3847/2041-8213/adc458

    2025 doi

  109. [118]

    2000, Extreme Value Distributions (PUBLISHED BY IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS AND DISTRIBUTED BY WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHING CO.), 10.1142/p191

    Kotz, S., & Nadarajah, S. 2000, Extreme Value Distributions (PUBLISHED BY IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS AND DISTRIBUTED BY WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHING CO.), 10.1142/p191

    2000 doi

  110. [119]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.04578, 10.48550/arXiv.2405.04578

    Kravtsov , A., & Belokurov , V. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.04578, 10.48550/arXiv.2405.04578

    2024 doi arXiv

  111. [120]

    2020, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    K \"u mmel , M., Bertin , E., Schefer , M., et al. 2020, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 527, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXIX, ed. R. Pizzo , E. R. Deul , J. D. Mol , J. de Plaa , & H. Verkouter , 29

    2020

  112. [121]

    2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2212.02428, 10.48550/arXiv.2212.02428

    Kümmel , M., \'A lvarez-Ayll \'o n , A., Bertin , E., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2212.02428, 10.48550/arXiv.2212.02428

    2022 doi arXiv

  113. [122]

    2023, Nature, 616, 266, 10.1038/s41586-023-05786-2

    Labbé, I., Van Dokkum, P., Nelson, E., et al. 2023, Nature, 616, 266, 10.1038/s41586-023-05786-2

    2023 doi

  114. [123]

    2023, , 957, L27, 10.3847/2041-8213/acfeec

    Langeroodi , D., & Hjorth , J. 2023, , 957, L27, 10.3847/2041-8213/acfeec

    2023 doi

  115. [124]

    2023, , 524, 5454, 10.1093/mnras/stad2202

    Leethochawalit , N., Roberts-Borsani , G., Morishita , T., Trenti , M., & Treu , T. 2023, , 524, 5454, 10.1093/mnras/stad2202

    2023 doi

  116. [125]

    Leung , G. C. K., Bagley , M. B., Finkelstein , S. L., et al. 2023, , 954, L46, 10.3847/2041-8213/acf365

    2023 doi

  117. [126]

    C., et al

    Li , Z., Dekel , A., Sarkar , K. C., et al. 2024, , 690, A108, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348727

    2024 doi

  118. [127]

    C., Finkelstein , S

    Livermore , R. C., Finkelstein , S. L., & Lotz , J. M. 2017, , 835, 113, 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/113

    2017 doi

  119. [128]

    C., Harrison , I., Harikane , Y., Tacchella , S., & Wilkins , S

    Lovell , C. C., Harrison , I., Harikane , Y., Tacchella , S., & Wilkins , S. M. 2023, , 518, 2511, 10.1093/mnras/stac3224

    2023 doi

  120. [129]

    C., Vijayan , A

    Lovell , C. C., Vijayan , A. P., Thomas , P. A., et al. 2021, , 500, 2127, 10.1093/mnras/staa3360

    2021 doi

  121. [130]

    2020, , 498, 2001, 10.1093/mnras/staa2404

    Ma , X., Quataert , E., Wetzel , A., et al. 2020, , 498, 2001, 10.1093/mnras/staa2404

    2020 doi

  122. [131]

    2014, , 52, 415, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615

    Madau , P., & Dickinson , M. 2014, , 52, 415, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615

    2014 doi

  123. [132]

    2006, , 652, 85, 10.1086/508143

    Maraston , C., Daddi , E., Renzini , A., et al. 2006, , 652, 85, 10.1086/508143

    2006 doi

  124. [133]

    2010, , 407, 830, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16973.x

    Maraston , C., Pforr , J., Renzini , A., et al. 2010, , 407, 830, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16973.x

    2010

  125. [134]

    2004, , 351, 169, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07765.x

    Marconi , A., Risaliti , G., Gilli , R., et al. 2004, , 351, 169, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07765.x

    2004

  126. [135]

    2024, , 685, A3, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347884

    Mascia , S., Pentericci , L., Calabr \`o , A., et al. 2024, , 685, A3, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347884

    2024 doi

  127. [136]

    A., Trenti , M., & Treu , T

    Mason , C. A., Trenti , M., & Treu , T. 2015, , 813, 21, 10.1088/0004-637X/813/1/21

    2015 doi

  128. [137]

    2023, , 521, 497, 10.1093/mnras/stad035

    ---. 2023, , 521, 497, 10.1093/mnras/stad035

    2023 doi

  129. [138]

    P., Brammer, G., et al

    Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 963, 129, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345

    2024 doi

  130. [139]

    J., Milvang-Jensen , B., Dunlop , J., et al

    McCracken , H. J., Milvang-Jensen , B., Dunlop , J., et al. 2012, , 544, A156, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219507

    2012 doi

  131. [140]

    J., Donnan , C

    McLeod , D. J., Donnan , C. T., McLure , R. J., et al. 2024, , 527, 5004, 10.1093/mnras/stad3471

    2024 doi

  132. [141]

    A., & Castellano , M

    Menci , N., Sen , A. A., & Castellano , M. 2024, , 976, 227, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8d5b

    2024 doi

  133. [142]

    R., Heckman , T

    Meurer , G. R., Heckman , T. M., & Calzetti , D. 1999, , 521, 64, 10.1086/307523

    1999 doi

  134. [143]

    Mirocha , J., & Furlanetto , S. R. 2023, , 519, 843, 10.1093/mnras/stac3578

    2023 doi

  135. [144]

    M., Finkelstein , S

    Morales , A. M., Finkelstein , S. L., Arrabal Haro , P., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.03118, 10.48550/arXiv.2507.03118

    2025 doi

  136. [145]

    B., Mirocha , J., Chisholm , J., Furlanetto , S

    Mu \ n oz , J. B., Mirocha , J., Chisholm , J., Furlanetto , S. R., & Mason , C. 2024, , 535, L37, 10.1093/mnrasl/slae086

    2024 doi

  137. [146]

    B., Mirocha , J., Furlanetto , S., & Sabti , N

    Mu \ n oz , J. B., Mirocha , J., Furlanetto , S., & Sabti , N. 2023, , 526, L47, 10.1093/mnrasl/slad115

    2023 doi

  138. [147]

    P., Oesch , P

    Naidu , R. P., Oesch , P. A., van Dokkum , P., et al. 2022, , 940, L14, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9b22

    2022 doi

  139. [148]

    P., Oesch , P

    Naidu , R. P., Oesch , P. A., Brammer , G., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.11263, 10.48550/arXiv.2505.11263

    2025 doi

  140. [149]

    2007, , 666, 955, 10.1086/520621

    Nozawa , T., Kozasa , T., Habe , A., et al. 2007, , 666, 955, 10.1086/520621

    2007 doi

  141. [150]

    A., Brammer , G., van Dokkum , P

    Oesch , P. A., Brammer , G., van Dokkum , P. G., et al. 2016, , 819, 129, 10.3847/0004-637X/819/2/129

    2016 doi

  142. [151]

    B., & Gunn , J

    Oke , J. B., & Gunn , J. E. 1983, , 266, 713, 10.1086/160817

    1983 doi

  143. [152]

    2023, , 951, 72, 10.3847/1538-4357/acd44a

    Ono , Y., Harikane , Y., Ouchi , M., et al. 2023, , 951, 72, 10.3847/1538-4357/acd44a

    2023 doi

  144. [153]

    2023, , 677, L4, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347384

    Pallottini , A., & Ferrara , A. 2023, , 677, L4, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347384

    2023 doi

  145. [154]

    W., Yang , G., et al

    Papovich , C., Cole , J. W., Yang , G., et al. 2023, , 949, L18, 10.3847/2041-8213/acc948

    2023 doi

  146. [155]

    J., et al

    Paquereau , L., Laigle , C., McCracken , H. J., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.11674, 10.48550/arXiv.2501.11674

    2025 doi

  147. [156]

    G., Costantin , L., Langeroodi , D., et al

    P \'e rez-Gonz \'a lez , P. G., Costantin , L., Langeroodi , D., et al. 2023, , 951, L1, 10.3847/2041-8213/acd9d0

    2023 doi

  148. [157]

    G., \"O stlin , G., Costantin , L., et al

    P \'e rez-Gonz \'a lez , P. G., \"O stlin , G., Costantin , L., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.15594, 10.48550/arXiv.2503.15594

    2025 doi

  149. [158]

    2012, , 422, 3285, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20848.x

    Pforr , J., Maraston , C., & Tonini , C. 2012, , 422, 3285, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20848.x

    2012

  150. [159]

    Planck Collaboration , Ade , P. A. R., Aghanim , N., et al. 2016, , 594, A13, 10.1051/0004-6361/201525830

    2016 doi

  151. [160]

    M., Barrientes , J., Blome , C., et al

    Pontoppidan , K. M., Barrientes , J., Blome , C., et al. 2022, , 936, L14, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac8a4e

    2022 doi

  152. [161]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2502.15581, 10.48550/arXiv.2502.15581

    Quilley , L., de Lapparent , V., Baes , M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2502.15581, 10.48550/arXiv.2502.15581

    2025 doi arXiv

  153. [162]

    2023, arminrest/jhat: The JWST HST Alignment Tool (JHAT) , v2, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.7892935

    Rest , A., Pierel , J., Correnti , M., et al. 2023, arminrest/jhat: The JWST HST Alignment Tool (JHAT) , v2, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.7892935

    2023 doi

  154. [163]

    2002, , 336, L33, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05990.x

    Ricotti , M. 2002, , 336, L33, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05990.x

    2002

  155. [164]

    J., Kelly , D., & Horner , S

    Rieke , M. J., Kelly , D., & Horner , S. 2005, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 5904, Cryogenic Optical Systems and Instruments XI, ed. J. B. Heaney & L. G. Burriesci , 1--8, 10.1117/12.615554

    2005 doi

  156. [165]

    J., Baum , S

    Rieke , M. J., Baum , S. A., Beichman , C. A., et al. 2003, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 4850, IR Space Telescopes and Instruments, ed. J. C. Mather , 478--485, 10.1117/12.489103

    2003 doi

  157. [166]

    J., Kelly , D

    Rieke , M. J., Kelly , D. M., Misselt , K., et al. 2023, , 135, 028001, 10.1088/1538-3873/acac53

    2023 doi

  158. [167]

    2024, , 976, 193, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad85d3

    Roberts-Borsani , G., Treu , T., Shapley , A., et al. 2024, , 976, 193, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad85d3

    2024 doi

  159. [168]

    2025, , 983, 18, 10.3847/1538-4357/adba60

    Roberts-Borsani , G., Bagley , M., Rojas-Ruiz , S., et al. 2025, , 983, 18, 10.3847/1538-4357/adba60

    2025 doi

  160. [169]

    Robertson , B. E. 2022, , 60, 121, 10.1146/annurev-astro-120221-044656

    2022 doi

  161. [170]

    E., Ellis , R

    Robertson , B. E., Ellis , R. S., Furlanetto , S. R., & Dunlop , J. S. 2015, , 802, L19, 10.1088/2041-8205/802/2/L19

    2015 doi

  162. [171]

    B., Roberts-Borsani , G., et al

    Rojas-Ruiz , S., Bagley , M. B., Roberts-Borsani , G., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.00843, 10.48550/arXiv.2408.00843

    2024 doi

  163. [172]

    Rowe , B. T. P., Jarvis , M., Mandelbaum , R., et al. 2015, Astronomy and Computing, 10, 121, 10.1016/j.ascom.2015.02.002

    2015 doi

  164. [173]

    A., Bower , R

    Schaye , J., Crain , R. A., Bower , R. G., et al. 2015, , 446, 521, 10.1093/mnras/stu2058

    2015 doi

  165. [174]

    1976, , 203, 297, 10.1086/154079

    Schechter , P. 1976, , 203, 297, 10.1086/154079

    1976 doi

  166. [175]

    1968, , 151, 393, 10.1086/149446

    Schmidt , M. 1968, , 151, 393, 10.1086/149446

    1968 doi

  167. [176]

    J., Ormerod , K., et al

    Schouws , S., Bouwens , R. J., Ormerod , K., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.20549, 10.48550/arXiv.2409.20549

    2024 doi arXiv

  168. [177]

    2007, , 172, 1, 10.1086/516585

    Scoville , N., Aussel , H., Brusa , M., et al. 2007, , 172, 1, 10.1086/516585

    2007 doi

  169. [178]

    2023, , 525, 3254, 10.1093/mnras/stad2508

    Shen , X., Vogelsberger , M., Boylan-Kolchin , M., Tacchella , S., & Kannan , R. 2023, , 525, 3254, 10.1093/mnras/stad2508

    2023 doi

  170. [179]

    B., Paquereau , L., et al

    Shuntov , M., Akins , H. B., Paquereau , L., et al. 2025 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.03243. 2506.03243

    2025

  171. [180]

    A., Toft , S., et al

    Shuntov , M., Oesch , P. A., Toft , S., et al. 2025 b , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.14280, 10.48550/arXiv.2503.14280

    2025 doi arXiv

  172. [181]

    2022, , 512, 3243, 10.1093/mnras/stac713

    Smith , A., Kannan , R., Garaldi , E., et al. 2022, , 512, 3243, 10.1093/mnras/stac713

    2022 doi

  173. [182]

    S., Yung , L

    Somerville , R. S., Yung , L. Y. A., Lancaster , L., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.05442, 10.48550/arXiv.2505.05442

    2025 doi

  174. [183]

    2023, , 958, 82, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0365

    Song , J., Fang , G., Lin , Z., Gu , Y., & Kong , X. 2023, , 958, 82, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0365

    2023 doi

  175. [184]

    Stark , D. P. 2016, , 54, 761, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023417

    2016 doi

  176. [185]

    J., Illingworth , G

    Stefanon , M., Bouwens , R. J., Illingworth , G. D., et al. 2022, , 935, 94, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7e44

    2022 doi

  177. [186]

    J., Labb \'e , I., et al

    Stefanon , M., Bouwens , R. J., Labb \'e , I., et al. 2021, , 922, 29, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1bb6

    2021 doi

  178. [187]

    C., Giavalisco , M., Pettini , M., Dickinson , M., & Adelberger , K

    Steidel , C. C., Giavalisco , M., Pettini , M., Dickinson , M., & Adelberger , K. L. 1996, , 462, L17, 10.1086/310029

    1996 doi

  179. [188]

    L., Bagley , M., et al

    Tacchella , S., Finkelstein , S. L., Bagley , M., et al. 2022, , 927, 170, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4cad

    2022 doi

  180. [189]

    2020, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Taffoni , G., Becciani , U., Garilli , B., et al. 2020, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 527, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXIX, ed. R. Pizzo , E. R. Deul , J. D. Mol , J. de Plaa , & H. Verkouter , 307, 10.48550/arXiv.2002.01283

    2020 doi arXiv

  181. [190]

    J., Kokorev , V., Kocevski , D

    Taylor , A. J., Kokorev , V., Kocevski , D. D., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.04609, 10.48550/arXiv.2505.04609

    2025 doi arXiv

  182. [191]

    W., Stark , D

    Topping , M. W., Stark , D. P., Endsley , R., et al. 2022, , 941, 153, 10.3847/1538-4357/aca522

    2022 doi

  183. [192]

    2024, , 529, 4087, 10.1093/mnras/stae800

    ---. 2024, , 529, 4087, 10.1093/mnras/stae800

    2024 doi

  184. [193]

    C., & Furlanetto , S

    Trapp , A. C., & Furlanetto , S. R. 2020, , 499, 2401, 10.1093/mnras/staa2828

    2020 doi

  185. [194]

    2008, , 676, 767, 10.1086/528674

    Trenti , M., & Stiavelli , M. 2008, , 676, 767, 10.1086/528674

    2008 doi

  186. [195]

    2024, , 529, 3563, 10.1093/mnras/stae651

    Trinca , A., Schneider , R., Valiante , R., et al. 2024, , 529, 3563, 10.1093/mnras/stae651

    2024 doi

  187. [196]

    2021, , 506, 202, 10.1093/mnras/stab1229

    Ucci , G., Dayal , P., Hutter , A., et al. 2021, , 506, 202, 10.1093/mnras/stab1229

    2021 doi

  188. [197]

    G., Bowler , R

    Varadaraj , R. G., Bowler , R. A. A., Jarvis , M. J., Adams , N. J., & H \"a u ler , B. 2023, , 524, 4586, 10.1093/mnras/stad2081

    2023 doi

  189. [198]

    P., Lovell , C

    Vijayan , A. P., Lovell , C. C., Wilkins , S. M., et al. 2021, , 501, 3289, 10.1093/mnras/staa3715

    2021 doi

  190. [199]

    Volonteri , M., & Gnedin , N. Y. 2009, , 703, 2113, 10.1088/0004-637X/703/2/2113

    2009 doi

  191. [200]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.02399, 10.48550/arXiv.2403.02399

    Wang , T., Sun , H., Zhou , L., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.02399, 10.48550/arXiv.2403.02399

    2024 doi arXiv

  192. [201]

    R., Kauffmann , O

    Weaver , J. R., Kauffmann , O. B., Ilbert , O., et al. 2022, , 258, 11, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac3078

    2022 doi

  193. [202]

    P., et al

    Whitler , L., Endsley , R., Stark , D. P., et al. 2023, , 519, 157, 10.1093/mnras/stac3535

    2023 doi

  194. [203]

    P., Topping , M

    Whitler , L., Stark , D. P., Topping , M. W., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.00984, 10.48550/arXiv.2501.00984

    2025 doi

  195. [204]

    C., Curtis-Lake , E., Hainline , K

    Williams , C. C., Curtis-Lake , E., Hainline , K. N., et al. 2018, , 236, 33, 10.3847/1538-4365/aabcbb

    2018 doi

  196. [205]

    J., Desprez , G., Asada , Y., et al

    Willott , C. J., Desprez , G., Asada , Y., et al. 2024, , 966, 74, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad35bc

    2024 doi

  197. [206]

    2023, , 621, 267, 10.1038/s41586-023-06413-w

    Witstok , J., Shivaei , I., Smit , R., et al. 2023, , 621, 267, 10.1038/s41586-023-06413-w

    2023 doi

  198. [207]

    2025, , 639, 897, 10.1038/s41586-025-08779-5

    Witstok , J., Jakobsen , P., Maiolino , R., et al. 2025, , 639, 897, 10.1038/s41586-025-08779-5

    2025 doi

  199. [208]

    2023, , 942, L9, 10.3847/2041-8213/aca80c

    Yan , H., Ma , Z., Ling , C., Cheng , C., & Huang , J.-S. 2023, , 942, L9, 10.3847/2041-8213/aca80c

    2023 doi

  200. [209]

    2022, , 938, L17, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac8803

    Yang , L., Morishita , T., Leethochawalit , N., et al. 2022, , 938, L17, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac8803

    2022 doi

  201. [210]

    S., Franco , M., et al

    Yang , L., Kartaltepe , J. S., Franco , M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.07185, 10.48550/arXiv.2504.07185

    2025 doi arXiv

  202. [211]

    Yung , L. Y. A., Somerville , R. S., Finkelstein , S. L., Popping , G., & Dav \'e , R. 2019, , 483, 2983, 10.1093/mnras/sty3241

    2019 doi

  203. [212]

    Yung , L. Y. A., Somerville , R. S., Finkelstein , S. L., Wilkins , S. M., & Gardner , J. P. 2024, , 527, 5929, 10.1093/mnras/stad3484

    2024 doi

  204. [213]

    A., Buat , V., Casey , C

    Zavala , J. A., Buat , V., Casey , C. M., et al. 2023, , 943, L9, 10.3847/2041-8213/acacfe

    2023 doi

  205. [214]

    2023, , 520, 2445, 10.1093/mnras/stad125

    Ziparo , F., Ferrara , A., Sommovigo , L., & Kohandel , M. 2023, , 520, 2445, 10.1093/mnras/stad125

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.