Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 111 references

A Novel Image Similarity Metric for Scene Composition Structure

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims a training-free metric, SCSSIM, can tell whether an image's scene composition—object positions, sizes, orientations—is preserved.

desk verdict The submitted full text is a different paper; reviewed on the abstract alone, the SCSSIM idea is plausible but entirely unsupported. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.05037 v4 pith:4SXXQDSC submitted 2025-08-07 cs.CV cs.ITmath.IT

Md Redwanul Haque , Manzur Murshed , Manoranjan Paul , Tsz-Kwan Lee This is my paper
classification cs.CVcs.ITmath.IT
keywords imagesimilaritymetricscenecompositionstructuretraining-freegenerativemodelevaluationstructuralfidelityfull-referencecuboidalhierarchicalpartitioningcompositionaldistortion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes SCSSIM, a similarity metric intended to measure whether an image preserves its scene composition structure—the positions, sizes, and orientations of objects relative to each other and the background. The metric is described as analytical and training-free: no neural network is fitted and no object detector is involved. Instead, it computes statistical measures over a cuboidal hierarchical partitioning of the image and derives a score from how those statistics differ between two images. The paper claims the score stays essentially constant under non-compositional distortions such as noise or texture changes, while decreasing monotonically as compositional distortions grow. If correct, SCSSIM supplies a cheap structural-fidelity check for generative-model outputs that pixel-level and perception-based metrics do not provide.

What carries the argument

Cuboidal hierarchical partitioning: the image is divided into cuboidal cells at multiple scales, and statistical measures computed over these cells form a non-object-based signature of the scene's spatial layout. This is the mechanism that lets SCSSIM claim to track geometry without object recognition; the score compares these signatures between images.

What would settle it

Take a fixed set of images and apply (1) strong noise or recolouring that leaves every object's position exactly unchanged, and (2) a graded sequence of object-position shifts. The central claim predicts the score stays flat under (1) and decreases monotonically under (2); any substantial movement in case (1) or a non-monotone response in case (2) would falsify it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that scene composition can be scored without semantic understanding. SCSSIM partitions an image into cuboidal regions arranged in a hierarchy and uses statistical measures over those regions to encode the spatial arrangement of content. Comparing the reference and candidate partitions gives a similarity score that, according to the paper, responds specifically to compositional changes rather than low-level visual changes. The reported behaviour is high invariance to non-compositional distortions and a strong monotonic decrease for compositional distortions, which positions the metric for evaluating generative models.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the statistical measures computed from the cuboidal partitions track geometric scene composition and ignore low-level appearance; if they respond to noise, texture, or lighting as much as to layout, the claimed invariance and monotonicity fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Generative image models can be screened for composition drift without retraining a metric or running object detectors.
  • Because the score is analytic, it can be computed on arbitrary image pairs and inserted into evaluation pipelines where neural metrics would add overhead or generalization risk.
  • The claimed monotonic response to compositional distortion means distortion severity could be ordered by score, not just detected as present or absent.
  • The claimed invariance to non-compositional distortion complements perceptual metrics by separating 'looks good' from 'layout preserved'.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Caveat for the reader: the supplied full text is an unrelated manuscript on video person re-identification, so the SCSSIM claims currently stand on the abstract; a reader seeking the metric's construction, equations, or experimental details will not find them in this record.
  • If the monotonicity claim holds, comparing SCSSIM scores with human ratings of composition similarity on the same distorted images would test whether the partition statistics align with human perception of layout.
  • The design suggests a family of training-free structural metrics: other spatial partitions or statistical summaries could be screened for the same invariance-to-appearance, sensitivity-to-layout profile.
  • If the invariance property is real, SCSSIM could become a compositional reward signal in generative-model training, a use the abstract does not explicitly propose but its stated properties would enable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript under review claims to introduce SCSSIM (SCS Similarity Index Measure), a novel, analytical, and training-free image similarity metric for evaluating scene composition structure (SCS). The abstract states that SCSSIM shows high invariance to non-compositional distortions and a strong monotonic decrease for compositional distortions, and that it captures non-object-based structural relationships via statistical measures derived from a Cuboidal hierarchical partitioning of images. However, the full text provided is not the SCSSIM paper. It is the HAMoBE paper (arXiv:2508.05037v2) on video-based person re-identification, containing a completely different method, experiments on ReID benchmarks (MARS, LS-VID, CCVID, MEVID), and a different set of contributions. No definition of SCSSIM, no description of the Cuboidal partitioning, no statistical measures, no distortion protocols, and no experimental results for the claimed metric appear anywhere in the submitted manuscript. The central claim of the abstract is therefore entirely unsupported by the body of the manuscript.

Significance. If the SCSSIM claims were substantiated, the metric would be a potentially valuable contribution to image quality assessment for generative models, because it is described as analytical, training-free, and specifically sensitive to geometric scene composition rather than to low-level pixel changes. The promise of a training-free metric with a stated invariance/monotonicity profile is scientifically appealing. However, the submitted manuscript does not deliver the claimed content. The body is the HAMoBE paper on person ReID, which is unrelated to the abstract. As a result, the significance of the SCSSIM proposal cannot be assessed from this submission. There are no datasets, baselines, numbers, error bars, or derivations for SCSSIM. The manuscript as written does not support any of its headline claims. The HAMoBE text itself may be a separate valid contribution, but it is not the one described in the title and abstract, and its content cannot be credited toward the SCSSIM claims.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract vs. Full Text] The manuscript is internally inconsistent at the most basic level. The abstract and title describe SCSSIM, a training-free image similarity metric for Scene Composition Structure. The full text, from the first line ("HAMoBE: Hierarchical and Adaptive Mixture of Biometric Experts for Video-based Person ReID") through the appendices, is an entirely different paper about video-based person re-identification. None of the sections or equations define SCSSIM, the Cuboidal hierarchical partitioning, the statistical measures used, or the distortion types. This is a load-bearing omission: the central claim of the abstract has no supporting method or evidence anywhere in the manuscript.
  2. [Section 4 (Experiments)] The experiments section reports results on video person ReID benchmarks (MARS, LS-VID, CCVID, MEVID) using mAP and top-1 accuracy. There are no experiments involving image similarity, compositional distortions, non-compositional distortions, or the claimed invariance/monotonicity properties. Even if the correct SCSSIM text were accidentally omitted, the present Experiments section contains no evidence that could support the abstract's claims of 'high invariance' and 'strong monotonic decrease.'
  3. [Equations (1)-(11)] All mathematical content in the manuscript belongs to the HAMoBE framework: multi-layer feature extraction, gating networks, expert modules, and loss functions (Eqs. 1-11). No equation defines an SCS similarity index. There is no formal definition of 'Scene Composition Structure,' no description of how statistical measures from 'Cuboidal hierarchical partitioning' are computed, and no derivation of the claimed monotonic behavior. The central premise—that such statistics track geometric composition—is asserted in the abstract but never established.
  4. [Abstract claims of quantitative findings] The abstract asserts 'SCSSIM's high invariance to non-compositional distortions' and 'a strong monotonic decrease for compositional distortions.' No dataset, distortion definition, baseline comparison, numerical result, or statistical significance measure is provided. For an empirical claim in image quality assessment, this is a missing-parts problem: the reader cannot reproduce or verify any of the stated properties. The provided full text does not remedy this, as it contains no SCSSIM experiments at all.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Title and metadata] The title, 'A Novel Image Similarity Metric for Scene Composition Structure,' does not match the body of the manuscript, which is about video-based person ReID. This mismatch will confuse readers and suggests an upload or version error.
  2. [References] The reference list contains only citations relevant to person ReID, gait recognition, mixture of experts, and CLIP-based video learners. There are no references to image quality assessment, structural similarity (SSIM), perceptual metrics, or scene composition. The literature context promised by the abstract is absent.
  3. [Appendix B (Limitations)] The only limitation statement in the manuscript (Appendix B) discusses HAMoBE's limitations regarding background information, low-resolution or occluded input, and privacy concerns. It says nothing about SCSSIM's limitations, the choice of partition depth, the selection of statistical measures, or the robustness of the claimed invariance. This is telling: the manuscript itself does not even pretend to address the abstract's contribution.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity established: the provided full text is a different paper (HAMoBE), so there is no SCSSIM derivation chain to audit.

full rationale

The claimed derivation chain belongs to the SCSSIM paper (arXiv:2508.05037), but the full text attached for review is HAMoBE (arXiv:2508.05038v2), a video-based person ReID manuscript. None of the load-bearing components of the SCSSIM claim—the definition of SCSSIM, the Cuboidal hierarchical partitioning, the statistical measures, the distortion protocols, or the experimental comparisons—appear anywhere in the provided text. Under the hard rules, circularity can only be claimed when the paper's own equations or self-citations exhibit a specific reduction of the prediction to its inputs. No such reduction can be quoted here because the equations themselves are absent. The abstract's statement that SCSSIM 'quantifies SCS preservation' and 'shows a strong monotonic decrease for compositional distortions' is an empirical claim about a metric, not by itself a demonstration that the metric is defined in terms of the validation labels or distortion definitions. The reader's identified weakest assumption—that the statistical measures are a faithful proxy for human-relevant scene composition—is a substantive concern about validity and completeness, but it is not a circularity argument. Accordingly, the honest finding is no significant circularity in the available evidence, and the score is 0. The lack of the actual SCSSIM method is a serious evidence/completeness problem, but it is not a circularity problem per the specified rubric.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 2 invented entities

Everything the abstract-level claims rest on: the central premise that partition statistics track geometric composition, the validity of the distortion labels, and background mathematics. The abstract is too thin to tell whether additional parameters (partition depth, statistic choice) were fit or chosen a priori, and no code or data artifacts are described.

free parameters (1)
  • Partition depth and statistic selection (unspecified)
    The abstract does not disclose how the number of partition levels or the choice of statistical measures was set, or whether they were chosen a priori rather than tuned on the distortion test data. Any such choice is a degree of freedom the central claims depend on.
assumptions (3)
  • ad hoc to paper Statistics of cuboidal hierarchical partitions of an image encode geometric scene composition (relative position, size, orientation of objects and background) without object recognition.
    The entire method rests on this premise, stated in the abstract as 'robustly capturing non-object-based structural relationships.' It is introduced by this paper and no independent evidence for it is given in the abstract.
  • domain assumption The distortion sets used in validation (non-compositional vs compositional) have reliable ground-truth labels of composition change.
    Claims of invariance and monotonic decrease presuppose that the test distortions were constructed and labeled in a way that matches the intended meaning of scene composition. Not verifiable from the abstract.
  • standard math Standard mathematics of image statistics and similarity measurement.
    Implied background for computing statistical measures over partitions, comparable to assumptions behind SSIM-family metrics. Not stated in the abstract, but uncontroversial.
invented entities (2)
  • Scene Composition Structure (SCS) as a measurable quantity
    purpose: Defines the target property that SCSSIM claims to quantify.
    SCS is defined only through the claimed behavior of the metric itself; the abstract gives no external benchmark showing that SCS as measured corresponds to human judgments of composition change.
  • Cuboidal hierarchical partitioning
    purpose: The image decomposition scheme from which statistical measures are drawn.
    The partitioning scheme is introduced as the paper's own construction and its properties are asserted in the abstract; no independent validation or comparison to other partitioning schemes is presented in the reviewable text.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Novel Image Similarity Metric for Scene Composition Structure." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4SXXQDSC

@misc{pith2026250805037,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Novel Image Similarity Metric for Scene Composition Structure},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4SXXQDSC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.05037}
}
read the original abstract

The rapid advancement of generative AI models necessitates novel methods for evaluating image quality that extend beyond human perception. A critical concern for these models is the preservation of an image's underlying Scene Composition Structure (SCS), which defines the geometric relationships among objects and the background, their relative positions, sizes, orientations, etc. Maintaining SCS integrity is paramount for ensuring faithful and structurally accurate GenAI outputs. Traditional image similarity metrics often fall short in assessing SCS. Pixel-level approaches are overly sensitive to minor visual noise, while perception-based metrics prioritize human aesthetic appeal, neither adequately capturing structural fidelity. Furthermore, recent neural-network-based metrics introduce training overheads and potential generalization issues. We introduce the SCS Similarity Index Measure (SCSSIM), a novel, analytical, and training-free metric that quantifies SCS preservation by exploiting statistical measures derived from the Cuboidal hierarchical partitioning of images, robustly capturing non-object-based structural relationships. Our experiments demonstrate SCSSIM's high invariance to non-compositional distortions, accurately reflecting unchanged SCS. Conversely, it shows a strong monotonic decrease for compositional distortions, precisely indicating when SCS has been altered. Compared to existing metrics, SCSSIM exhibits superior properties for structural evaluation, making it an invaluable tool for developing and evaluating generative models, ensuring the integrity of scene composition.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Biased mixtures of experts: Enabling computer vision inference under data transfer limitations

    Alhabib Abbas and Yiannis Andreopoulos. Biased mixtures of experts: Enabling computer vision inference under data transfer limitations. TIP, 2020. 3

    2020

  2. [2]

    Network of experts for large-scale image categoriza- tion

    Karim Ahmed, Mohammad Haris Baig, and Lorenzo Torre- sani. Network of experts for large-scale image categoriza- tion. In ECCV, 2016. 3

    2016

  3. [3]

    Salient-to-broad transition for video person re- identification

    Shutao Bai, Bingpeng Ma, Hong Chang, Rui Huang, and Xilin Chen. Salient-to-broad transition for video person re- identification. In CVPR, 2022. 6

    2022

  4. [4]

    Quo vadis, action recognition? a new model and the kinetics dataset

    Joao Carreira and Andrew Zisserman. Quo vadis, action recognition? a new model and the kinetics dataset. In CVPR, 2017. 6

    2017

  5. [5]

    Lagrange motion analysis and view em- beddings for improved gait recognition

    Tianrui Chai, Annan Li, Shaoxiong Zhang, Zilong Li, and Yunhong Wang. Lagrange motion analysis and view em- beddings for improved gait recognition. In CVPR, 2022. 3

    2022

  6. [6]

    Gaitset: Regarding gait as a set for cross-view gait recognition

    Hanqing Chao, Yiwei He, Junping Zhang, and Jianfeng Feng. Gaitset: Regarding gait as a set for cross-view gait recognition. In AAAI, 2019. 6

    2019

  7. [7]

    Gaitset: Cross-view gait recognition through utilizing gait as a deep set

    Hanqing Chao, Kun Wang, Yiwei He, Junping Zhang, and Jianfeng Feng. Gaitset: Cross-view gait recognition through utilizing gait as a deep set. TPAMI, 2021. 3

    2021

  8. [8]

    Learn- ing 3D shape feature for texture-insensitive person re- identification

    Jiaxing Chen, Xinyang Jiang, Fudong Wang, Jun Zhang, Feng Zheng, Xing Sun, and Wei-Shi Zheng. Learn- ing 3D shape feature for texture-insensitive person re- identification. In CVPR, 2021. 2

    2021

Show all 111 references
  1. [9]

    Eve: Efficient vision-language pre-training with masked prediction and modality-aware moe

    Junyi Chen, Longteng Guo, Jia Sun, Shuai Shao, Zehuan Yuan, Liang Lin, and Dongyu Zhang. Eve: Efficient vision-language pre-training with masked prediction and modality-aware moe. In AAAI, 2024. 3

    2024

  2. [10]

    Adamv-moe: Adaptive multi-task vision mixture-of-experts

    Tianlong Chen, Xuxi Chen, Xianzhi Du, Abdullah Rash- wan, Fan Yang, Huizhong Chen, Zhangyang Wang, and Yeqing Li. Adamv-moe: Adaptive multi-task vision mixture-of-experts. In ICCV, 2023. 3

    2023

  3. [11]

    Video person re-identification by temporal residual learning

    Ju Dai, Pingping Zhang, Dong Wang, Huchuan Lu, and Hongyu Wang. Video person re-identification by temporal residual learning. TIP, 2018. 2

    2018

  4. [12]

    Generalizable person re-identification with relevance-aware mixture of experts

    Yongxing Dai, Xiaotong Li, Jun Liu, Zekun Tong, and Ling-Yu Duan. Generalizable person re-identification with relevance-aware mixture of experts. In CVPR, 2021. 3

    2021

  5. [13]

    MEVID: Multi-view extended videos with identities for video person re-identification

    Daniel Davila, Dawei Du, Bryon Lewis, Christopher Funk, Joseph Van Pelt, Roderic Collins, Kellie Corona, Matt Brown, Scott McCloskey, Anthony Hoogs, et al. MEVID: Multi-view extended videos with identities for video person re-identification. In WACV, 2023. 6, 7, 8

    2023

  6. [14]

    Metagait: Learning to learn an omni sample adaptive representation for gait recognition

    Huanzhang Dou, Pengyi Zhang, Wei Su, Yunlong Yu, and Xi Li. Metagait: Learning to learn an omni sample adaptive representation for gait recognition. In ECCV, 2022. 3

    2022

  7. [15]

    Gaitgci: Generative counterfactual in- tervention for gait recognition

    Huanzhang Dou, Pengyi Zhang, Wei Su, Yunlong Yu, Yin- ing Lin, and Xi Li. Gaitgci: Generative counterfactual in- tervention for gait recognition. In CVPR, 2023. 3

    2023

  8. [16]

    Learning factored representations in a deep mixture of ex- perts

    David Eigen, Marc’Aurelio Ranzato, and Ilya Sutskever. Learning factored representations in a deep mixture of ex- perts. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.4314, 2013. 3

    2013 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Video-based person re-identification with spatial and tem- poral memory networks

    Chanho Eom, Geon Lee, Junghyup Lee, and Bumsub Ham. Video-based person re-identification with spatial and tem- poral memory networks. In ICCV, 2021. 7

    2021

  10. [18]

    Gaitpart: Temporal part-based model for gait recognition

    Chao Fan, Yunjie Peng, Chunshui Cao, Xu Liu, Saihui Hou, Jiannan Chi, Yongzhen Huang, Qing Li, and Zhiqiang He. Gaitpart: Temporal part-based model for gait recognition. In CVPR, 2020. 3

    2020

  11. [19]

    Opengait: Revisiting gait recognition towards better practicality

    Chao Fan, Junhao Liang, Chuanfu Shen, Saihui Hou, Yongzhen Huang, and Shiqi Yu. Opengait: Revisiting gait recognition towards better practicality. In CVPR, 2023. 3

    2023

  12. [20]

    Switch transformers: Scaling to trillion parameter models with simple and efficient sparsity

    William Fedus, Barret Zoph, and Noam Shazeer. Switch transformers: Scaling to trillion parameter models with simple and efficient sparsity. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2022. 3

    2022

  13. [21]

    Sta: Spatial-temporal attention for large-scale video-based person re-identification

    Yang Fu, Xiaoyang Wang, Yunchao Wei, and Thomas Huang. Sta: Spatial-temporal attention for large-scale video-based person re-identification. In AAAI, 2019. 1

    2019

  14. [22]

    Mutual mean-teaching: Pseudo label refinery for unsupervised do- main adaptation on person re-identification

    Yixiao Ge, Dapeng Chen, and Hongsheng Li. Mutual mean-teaching: Pseudo label refinery for unsupervised do- main adaptation on person re-identification. In ICLR, 2020. 2

    2020

  15. [23]

    Self- paced contrastive learning with hybrid memory for domain adaptive object re-id

    Yixiao Ge, Feng Zhu, Dapeng Chen, Rui Zhao, et al. Self- paced contrastive learning with hybrid memory for domain adaptive object re-id. In NeurIPS, 2020. 2

    2020

  16. [24]

    Hard mixtures of experts for large scale weakly supervised vision

    Sam Gross, Marc’Aurelio Ranzato, and Arthur Szlam. Hard mixtures of experts for large scale weakly supervised vision. In CVPR, 2017. 3

    2017

  17. [25]

    Appearance-preserving 3D convolution for video-based person re-identification

    Xinqian Gu, Hong Chang, Bingpeng Ma, Hongkai Zhang, and Xilin Chen. Appearance-preserving 3D convolution for video-based person re-identification. In ECCV, 2020. 2, 6, 7

    2020

  18. [26]

    Clothes-changing person re-identification with RGB modality only

    Xinqian Gu, Hong Chang, Bingpeng Ma, Shutao Bai, Shiguang Shan, and Xilin Chen. Clothes-changing person re-identification with RGB modality only. In CVPR, 2022. 2, 6, 7

    2022

  19. [27]

    Motion feature aggregation for video-based person re-identification

    Xinqian Gu, Hong Chang, Bingpeng Ma, and Shiguang Shan. Motion feature aggregation for video-based person re-identification. TIP, 2022. 6

    2022

  20. [28]

    Dense interaction learning for video-based person re-identification

    Tianyu He, Xin Jin, Xu Shen, Jianqiang Huang, Zhibo Chen, and Xian-Sheng Hua. Dense interaction learning for video-based person re-identification. In ICCV, 2021. 6

    2021

  21. [29]

    In defense of the triplet loss for person re-identification

    Alexander Hermans, Lucas Beyer, and Bastian Leibe. In defense of the triplet loss for person re-identification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.07737, 2017. 6

    2017 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Temporal complementary learning for video person re-identification

    Ruibing Hou, Hong Chang, Bingpeng Ma, Shiguang Shan, and Xilin Chen. Temporal complementary learning for video person re-identification. In ECCV, 2020. 6, 7

    2020

  23. [31]

    Bicnet-tks: Learning efficient spatial- temporal representation for video person re-identification

    Ruibing Hou, Hong Chang, Bingpeng Ma, Rui Huang, and Shiguang Shan. Bicnet-tks: Learning efficient spatial- temporal representation for video person re-identification. In CVPR, 2021. 7

    2021

  24. [32]

    Gait lateral network: Learning discriminative and compact representations for gait recognition

    Saihui Hou, Chunshui Cao, Xu Liu, and Yongzhen Huang. Gait lateral network: Learning discriminative and compact representations for gait recognition. In ECCV, 2020. 3

    2020

  25. [33]

    Celebrities-ReID: A benchmark for clothes variation in long-term person re-identification

    Yan Huang, Qiang Wu, Jingsong Xu, and Yi Zhong. Celebrities-ReID: A benchmark for clothes variation in long-term person re-identification. In IJCNN, 2019. 2

    2019

  26. [34]

    Beyond scalar neuron: Adopting vector-neuron capsules for long-term person re- identification

    Yan Huang, Jingsong Xu, Qiang Wu, Yi Zhong, Peng Zhang, and Zhaoxiang Zhang. Beyond scalar neuron: Adopting vector-neuron capsules for long-term person re- identification. TCSVT, 2019. 2

    2019

  27. [35]

    Clothing status awareness for long-term person re-identification

    Yan Huang, Qiang Wu, JingSong Xu, Yi Zhong, and ZhaoXiang Zhang. Clothing status awareness for long-term person re-identification. In ICCV, 2021. 2

    2021

  28. [36]

    3d local con- volutional neural networks for gait recognition

    Zhen Huang, Dixiu Xue, Xu Shen, Xinmei Tian, Houqiang Li, Jianqiang Huang, and Xian-Sheng Hua. 3d local con- volutional neural networks for gait recognition. In CVPR,

  29. [37]

    Adaptive mixtures of local experts

    Robert A Jacobs, Michael I Jordan, Steven J Nowlan, and Geoffrey E Hinton. Adaptive mixtures of local experts. Neural computation, 1991. 2, 3

    1991

  30. [38]

    Prox- yfusion: Face feature aggregation through sparse experts

    Bhavin Jawade, Alexander Stone, Deen Dayal Mohan, Xiao Wang, Srirangaraj Setlur, and Venu Govindaraju. Prox- yfusion: Face feature aggregation through sparse experts. NeurIPS, 2024. 3

    2024

  31. [39]

    Mixtral of experts

    Albert Q Jiang, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Antoine Roux, Arthur Mensch, Blanche Savary, Chris Bamford, Deven- dra Singh Chaplot, Diego de las Casas, Emma Bou Hanna, Florian Bressand, et al. Mixtral of experts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.04088, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Cloth-changing person re- identification from a single image with gait prediction and regularization

    Xin Jin, Tianyu He, Kecheng Zheng, Zhiheng Yin, Xu Shen, Zhen Huang, Ruoyu Feng, Jianqiang Huang, Zhibo Chen, and Xian-Sheng Hua. Cloth-changing person re- identification from a single image with gait prediction and regularization. In CVPR, 2022. 2

    2022

  33. [41]

    Hierarchical mix- tures of experts and the em algorithm

    Michael I Jordan and Robert A Jacobs. Hierarchical mix- tures of experts and the em algorithm. Neural computation,

  34. [42]

    Feature disentanglement learning with switching and aggregation for video-based person re-identification

    Minjung Kim, MyeongAh Cho, and Sangyoun Lee. Feature disentanglement learning with switching and aggregation for video-based person re-identification. In WACV, 2023. 2

    2023

  35. [43]

    Keypoint relative position encoding for face recog- nition

    Minchul Kim, Yiyang Su, Feng Liu, Anil Jain, and Xiaom- ing Liu. Keypoint relative position encoding for face recog- nition. In CVPR, 2024. 3

    2024

  36. [44]

    Sapiensid: Foundation for human recognition

    Minchul Kim, Dingqiang Ye, Yiyang Su, Feng Liu, and Xi- aoming Liu. Sapiensid: Foundation for human recognition. In CVPR, 2025. 2

    2025

  37. [45]

    Sparse upcy- cling: Training mixture-of-experts from dense checkpoints

    Aran Komatsuzaki, Joan Puigcerver, James Lee-Thorp, Carlos Riquelme Ruiz, Basil Mustafa, Joshua Ainslie, Yi Tay, Mostafa Dehghani, and Neil Houlsby. Sparse upcy- cling: Training mixture-of-experts from dense checkpoints. In ICLR, 2023. 3

    2023

  38. [46]

    Gshard: Scaling giant models with conditional computation and automatic sharding

    Dmitry Lepikhin, HyoukJoong Lee, Yuanzhong Xu, Dehao Chen, Orhan Firat, Yanping Huang, Maxim Krikun, Noam Shazeer, and Zhifeng Chen. Gshard: Scaling giant models with conditional computation and automatic sharding. In ICLR, 2021. 3

    2021

  39. [47]

    Global-local temporal representations for video per- son re-identification

    Jianing Li, Jingdong Wang, Qi Tian, Wen Gao, and Shiliang Zhang. Global-local temporal representations for video per- son re-identification. In ICCV, 2019. 6

    2019

  40. [48]

    Multi- scale 3D convolution network for video based person re- identification

    Jianing Li, Shiliang Zhang, and Tiejun Huang. Multi- scale 3D convolution network for video based person re- identification. In AAAi, 2019. 2

    2019

  41. [49]

    Unsuper- vised person re-identification by deep learning tracklet as- sociation

    Minxian Li, Xiatian Zhu, and Shaogang Gong. Unsuper- vised person re-identification by deep learning tracklet as- sociation. In ECCV, 2018. 2

    2018

  42. [50]

    Unsuper- vised tracklet person re-identification

    Minxian Li, Xiatian Zhu, and Shaogang Gong. Unsuper- vised tracklet person re-identification. TPAMI, 2019. 2

    2019

  43. [51]

    Merge, then compress: Demystify efficient SMoe with hints from its routing policy

    Pingzhi Li, Zhenyu Zhang, Prateek Yadav, Yi-Lin Sung, Yu Cheng, Mohit Bansal, and Tianlong Chen. Merge, then compress: Demystify efficient SMoe with hints from its routing policy. In ICLR, 2024. 3

    2024

  44. [52]

    Learn- ing shape representations for person re-identification under clothing change

    Yu-Jhe Li, Xinshuo Weng, and Kris M Kitani. Learn- ing shape representations for person re-identification under clothing change. In WACV, 2021. 2

    2021

  45. [53]

    Gaitedge: Beyond plain end-to-end gait recognition for better practicality

    Junhao Liang, Chao Fan, Saihui Hou, Chuanfu Shen, Yongzhen Huang, and Shiqi Yu. Gaitedge: Beyond plain end-to-end gait recognition for better practicality. InECCV,

  46. [54]

    Gaitmask: Mask- based model for gait recognition

    Beibei Lin, Yu Liu, and Shunli Zhang. Gaitmask: Mask- based model for gait recognition. In BMVC, 2021. 3

    2021

  47. [55]

    Gait recognition via effective global-local feature representation and local temporal aggregation

    Beibei Lin, Shunli Zhang, and Xin Yu. Gait recognition via effective global-local feature representation and local temporal aggregation. In ICCV, 2021. 3

    2021

  48. [56]

    A bottom-up clustering approach to unsupervised person re-identification

    Yutian Lin, Xuanyi Dong, Liang Zheng, Yan Yan, and Yi Yang. A bottom-up clustering approach to unsupervised person re-identification. In AAAI, 2019. 2

    2019

  49. [57]

    Frozen CLIP models are efficient video learners

    Ziyi Lin, Shijie Geng, Renrui Zhang, Peng Gao, Gerard De Melo, Xiaogang Wang, Jifeng Dai, Yu Qiao, and Hong- sheng Li. Frozen CLIP models are efficient video learners. In ECCV, 2022. 4

    2022

  50. [58]

    Learning clothing and pose invariant 3D shape rep- resentation for long-term person re-identification

    Feng Liu, Minchul Kim, ZiAng Gu, Anil Jain, and Xiaom- ing Liu. Learning clothing and pose invariant 3D shape rep- resentation for long-term person re-identification. In ICCV,

  51. [59]

    Farsight: A physics-driven whole-body biometric system at large dis- tance and altitude

    Feng Liu, Ryan Ashbaugh, Nicholas Chimitt, Najmul Has- san, Ali Hassani, Ajay Jaiswal, Minchul Kim, Zhiyuan Mao, Christopher Perry, Zhiyuan Ren, et al. Farsight: A physics-driven whole-body biometric system at large dis- tance and altitude. In WACV, 2024. 1

    2024

  52. [60]

    Distilling clip with dual guidance for learning discrimina- tive human body shape representation

    Feng Liu, Minchul Kim, Zhiyuan Ren, and Xiaoming Liu. Distilling clip with dual guidance for learning discrimina- tive human body shape representation. In CVPR, 2024. 2, 6, 7

    2024

  53. [61]

    Person recogni- tion at altitude and range: Fusion of face, body shape and gait

    Feng Liu, Nicholas Chimitt, Lanqing Guo, Jitesh Jain, Aditya Kane, Minchul Kim, Wes Robbins, Yiyang Su, Dingqiang Ye, Xingguang Zhang, et al. Person recogni- tion at altitude and range: Fusion of face, body shape and gait. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.04616, 2025. 1

    2025 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Video-based person re-identification with accumulative motion context

    Hao Liu, Zequn Jie, Karlekar Jayashree, Meibin Qi, Jian- guo Jiang, Shuicheng Yan, and Jiashi Feng. Video-based person re-identification with accumulative motion context. TCSVT, 2017. 1

    2017

  55. [63]

    Watching you: Global-guided recip- rocal learning for video-based person re-identification

    Xuehu Liu, Pingping Zhang, Chenyang Yu, Huchuan Lu, and Xiaoyun Yang. Watching you: Global-guided recip- rocal learning for video-based person re-identification. In CVPR, 2021. 2

    2021

  56. [64]

    Deeply coupled convolution–transformer with spatial– temporal complementary learning for video-based person re-identification

    Xuehu Liu, Chenyang Yu, Pingping Zhang, and Huchuan Lu. Deeply coupled convolution–transformer with spatial– temporal complementary learning for video-based person re-identification. TNNLS, 2023. 6

    2023

  57. [65]

    Video-based person re-identification with long short-term representation learning

    Xuehu Liu, Pingping Zhang, and Huchuan Lu. Video-based person re-identification with long short-term representation learning. In International Conference on Image and Graph- ics. Springer, 2023. 6

    2023

  58. [66]

    A video is worth three views: Trigeminal transformers for video-based per- son re-identification

    Xuehu Liu, Pingping Zhang, Chenyang Yu, Xuesheng Qian, Xiaoyun Yang, and Huchuan Lu. A video is worth three views: Trigeminal transformers for video-based per- son re-identification. TITS, 2024. 6

    2024

  59. [67]

    Spatial and temporal mutual promotion for video-based person re-identification

    Yiheng Liu, Zhenxun Yuan, Wengang Zhou, and Houqiang Li. Spatial and temporal mutual promotion for video-based person re-identification. In AAAI, 2019. 1

    2019

  60. [68]

    Recurrent convolutional network for video-based person re-identification

    Niall McLaughlin, Jesus Martinez Del Rincon, and Paul Miller. Recurrent convolutional network for video-based person re-identification. In CVPR, 2016. 1, 2

    2016

  61. [69]

    Boult, Anderson Rocha, Haidong Zhu, Zhao- heng Zheng, Ram Nevatia, Zaigham Randhawa, Sinan Sabri, and Gianfranco Doretto

    Kien Nguyen, Clinton Fookes, Sridha Sridharan, Feng Liu, Xiaoming Liu, Arun Ross, Dana Michalski, Huy Nguyen, Debayan Deb, Mahak Kothari, Manisha Saini, Dawei Du, Scott McCloskey, Gabriel Bertocco, Fernanda Andal �o, Terrance E. Boult, Anderson Rocha, Haidong Zhu, Zhao- heng Z...

    2023

  62. [70]

    Temporal 3D shape modeling for video-based cloth- changing person re-identification

    Vuong D Nguyen, Pranav Mantini, and Shishir K Shah. Temporal 3D shape modeling for video-based cloth- changing person re-identification. In WACV, 2024. 2

    2024

  63. [71]

    Wheeler, and Xi- aoming Liu

    Necmiye Ozay, Yan Tong, Frederick W. Wheeler, and Xi- aoming Liu. Improving face recognition with a quality- based probabilistic framework. In CVPRW, 2009. 3

    2009

  64. [72]

    Video person re-id: Fantastic techniques and where to find them (student abstract)

    Priyank Pathak, Amir Erfan Eshratifar, and Michael Gormish. Video person re-id: Fantastic techniques and where to find them (student abstract). In AAAI, 2020. 7

    2020

  65. [73]

    Using mixture of expert models to gain insights into semantic segmentation

    Svetlana Pavlitskaya, Christian Hubschneider, Michael We- ber, Ruby Moritz, Fabian Huger, Peter Schlicht, and Marius Zollner. Using mixture of expert models to gain insights into semantic segmentation. In CVPRW, 2020. 3

    2020

  66. [74]

    Learn- ing transferable visual models from natural language super- vision

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learn- ing transferable visual models from natural language super- vision. In ICML, 2021. 2, 3

    2021

  67. [75]

    Scaling vision with sparse mix- ture of experts

    Carlos Riquelme, Joan Puigcerver, Basil Mustafa, Maxim Neumann, Rodolphe Jenatton, Andr´e Susano Pinto, Daniel Keysers, and Neil Houlsby. Scaling vision with sparse mix- ture of experts. In NeurIPS, 2021. 3

    2021

  68. [76]

    On the exploration of joint attribute learning for person re-identification

    Joseph Roth and Xiaoming Liu. On the exploration of joint attribute learning for person re-identification. In ACCV,

  69. [77]

    Outrageously large neural networks: The sparsely-gated mixture-of-experts layer

    Noam Shazeer, Azalia Mirhoseini, Krzysztof Maziarz, Andy Davis, Quoc Le, Geoffrey Hinton, and Jeff Dean. Outrageously large neural networks: The sparsely-gated mixture-of-experts layer. In ICLR, 2017. 3

    2017

  70. [78]

    Lidargait: Benchmarking 3d gait recognition with point clouds

    Chuanfu Shen, Chao Fan, Wei Wu, Rui Wang, George Q Huang, and Shiqi Yu. Lidargait: Benchmarking 3d gait recognition with point clouds. In CVPR, 2023. 3

    2023

  71. [79]

    Large-scale spatio- temporal person re-identification: Algorithms and bench- mark

    Xiujun Shu, Xiao Wang, Xianghao Zang, Shiliang Zhang, Yuanqi Chen, Ge Li, and Qi Tian. Large-scale spatio- temporal person re-identification: Algorithms and bench- mark. TCSVT, 2021. 2

    2021

  72. [80]

    Open-set biometrics: Beyond good closed-set models

    Yiyang Su, Minchul Kim, Feng Liu, Anil Jain, and Xi- aoming Liu. Open-set biometrics: Beyond good closed-set models. In ECCV, 2024. 2

    2024

  73. [81]

    Wheeler, and Xiaoming Liu

    Yan Tong, Frederick W. Wheeler, and Xiaoming Liu. Im- proving biometric identification through quality- based face and fingerprint biometric fusion. In CVPRW, 2010. 3

    2010

  74. [82]

    When person re-identification meets changing clothes

    Fangbin Wan, Yang Wu, Xuelin Qian, Yixiong Chen, and Yanwei Fu. When person re-identification meets changing clothes. In CVPRW, 2020. 2

    2020

  75. [83]

    Transferable joint attribute-identity deep learning for unsu- pervised person re-identification

    Jingya Wang, Xiatian Zhu, Shaogang Gong, and Wei Li. Transferable joint attribute-identity deep learning for unsu- pervised person re-identification. In CVPR, 2018. 2

    2018

  76. [84]

    Dygait: Ex- ploiting dynamic representations for high-performance gait recognition

    Ming Wang, Xianda Guo, Beibei Lin, Tian Yang, Zheng Zhu, Lincheng Li, Shunli Zhang, and Xin Yu. Dygait: Ex- ploiting dynamic representations for high-performance gait recognition. In ICCV, 2023. 3

    2023

  77. [85]

    Non-local neural networks

    Xiaolong Wang, Ross Girshick, Abhinav Gupta, and Kaim- ing He. Non-local neural networks. In CVPR, 2018. 6

    2018

  78. [86]

    Deep mixture of experts via shallow embedding

    Xin Wang, Fisher Yu, Lisa Dunlap, Yi-An Ma, Ruth Wang, Azalia Mirhoseini, Trevor Darrell, and Joseph E Gonzalez. Deep mixture of experts via shallow embedding. In Uncer- tainty in artificial intelligence, 2020. 3

    2020

  79. [87]

    Multi-expert adversarial attack detection in person re-identification using context inconsis- tency

    Xueping Wang, Shasha Li, Min Liu, Yaonan Wang, and Amit K Roy-Chowdhury. Multi-expert adversarial attack detection in person re-identification using context inconsis- tency. In ICCV, 2021. 3

    2021

  80. [88]

    Pyramid spatial-temporal aggre- gation for video-based person re-identification

    Yingquan Wang, Pingping Zhang, Shang Gao, Xia Geng, Hu Lu, and Dong Wang. Pyramid spatial-temporal aggre- gation for video-based person re-identification. In ICCV,

  81. [89]

    Decoupled feature-based mixture of experts for multi- modal object re-identification

    Yuhao Wang, Yang Liu, Aihua Zheng, and Pingping Zhang. Decoupled feature-based mixture of experts for multi- modal object re-identification. In AAAI, 2025. 3

    2025

  82. [90]

    Cavit: Contextual alignment vision transformer for video object re-identification

    Jinlin Wu, Lingxiao He, Wu Liu, Yang Yang, Zhen Lei, Tao Mei, and Stan Z Li. Cavit: Contextual alignment vision transformer for video object re-identification. In ECCV,

  83. [91]

    Adaptive graph representation learn- ing for video person re-identification

    Yiming Wu, Omar El Farouk Bourahla, Xi Li, Fei Wu, Qi Tian, and Xue Zhou. Adaptive graph representation learn- ing for video person re-identification. TIP, 2020. 7

    2020

  84. [92]

    DeepChange: A large long-term person re-identification benchmark with clothes change

    Peng Xu and Xiatian Zhu. DeepChange: A large long-term person re-identification benchmark with clothes change. In ICCV, 2023. 2

    2023

  85. [93]

    Condconv: Conditionally parameterized convolu- tions for efficient inference

    Brandon Yang, Gabriel Bender, Quoc V Le, and Jiquan Ngiam. Condconv: Conditionally parameterized convolu- tions for efficient inference. In NeurIPS, 2019. 3

    2019

  86. [94]

    Spatial-temporal graph convolutional network for video-based person re-identification

    Jinrui Yang, Wei-Shi Zheng, Qize Yang, Ying-Cong Chen, and Qi Tian. Spatial-temporal graph convolutional network for video-based person re-identification. In CVPR, 2020. 1

    2020

  87. [95]

    Person re- identification by contour sketch under moderate clothing change

    Qize Yang, Ancong Wu, and Wei-Shi Zheng. Person re- identification by contour sketch under moderate clothing change. TPAMI, 2019. 2

    2019

  88. [96]

    BigGait: Learning gait representation you want by large vision models

    Dingqiang Ye, Chao Fan, Jingzhe Ma, Xiaoming Liu, and Shiqi Yu. BigGait: Learning gait representation you want by large vision models. In CVPR, 2024. 3

    2024

  89. [97]

    Shiftaddvit: Mixture of multiplication primitives towards efficient vision transformer

    Haoran You, Huihong Shi, Yipin Guo, and Yingyan Lin. Shiftaddvit: Mixture of multiplication primitives towards efficient vision transformer. In NeurIPS, 2024. 3

    2024

  90. [98]

    Top- push video-based person re-identification

    Jinjie You, Ancong Wu, Xiang Li, and Wei-Shi Zheng. Top- push video-based person re-identification. In CVPR, 2016. 1

    2016

  91. [99]

    TF-CLIP: Learning text-free CLIP for video-based person re-identification

    Chenyang Yu, Xuehu Liu, Yingquan Wang, Pingping Zhang, and Huchuan Lu. TF-CLIP: Learning text-free CLIP for video-based person re-identification. In AAAI,

  92. [100]

    Unsupervised per- son re-identification by soft multilabel learning

    Hong-Xing Yu, Wei-Shi Zheng, Ancong Wu, Xiaowei Guo, Shaogang Gong, and Jian-Huang Lai. Unsupervised per- son re-identification by soft multilabel learning. In CVPR,

  93. [101]

    COCAS: A large-scale clothes changing per- son dataset for re-identification

    Shijie Yu, Shihua Li, Dapeng Chen, Rui Zhao, Junjie Yan, and Yu Qiao. COCAS: A large-scale clothes changing per- son dataset for re-identification. In CVPR, 2020. 2

    2020

  94. [102]

    Multidirection and multiscale pyramid in transformer for video-based pedes- trian retrieval

    Xianghao Zang, Ge Li, and Wei Gao. Multidirection and multiscale pyramid in transformer for video-based pedes- trian retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informat- ics, 2022. 7

    2022

  95. [103]

    Ad-cluster: Aug- mented discriminative clustering for domain adaptive per- son re-identification

    Yunpeng Zhai, Shijian Lu, Qixiang Ye, Xuebo Shan, Jie Chen, Rongrong Ji, and Yonghong Tian. Ad-cluster: Aug- mented discriminative clustering for domain adaptive per- son re-identification. In CVPR, 2020. 2

    2020

  96. [104]

    Spatiotemporal trans- former for video-based person re-identification

    Tianyu Zhang, Longhui Wei, Lingxi Xie, Zijie Zhuang, Yongfei Zhang, Bo Li, and Qi Tian. Spatiotemporal trans- former for video-based person re-identification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.16469, 2021. 6

    2021 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Gait recognition via disentangled representation learning

    Ziyuan Zhang, Luan Tran, Xi Yin, Yousef Atoum, Xiaom- ing Liu, Jian Wan, and Nanxin Wang. Gait recognition via disentangled representation learning. In CVPR, 2019. 3

    2019

  98. [106]

    On learning disentangled representations for gait recognition

    Ziyuan Zhang, Luan Tran, Feng Liu, and Xiaoming Liu. On learning disentangled representations for gait recognition. TPAMI, 2022. 3, 6

    2022

  99. [107]

    Mars: A video benchmark for large-scale person re-identification

    Liang Zheng, Zhi Bie, Yifan Sun, Jingdong Wang, Chi Su, Shengjin Wang, and Qi Tian. Mars: A video benchmark for large-scale person re-identification. In ECCV, 2016. 6

    2016

  100. [108]

    Joint discriminative and generative learning for person re-identification

    Zhedong Zheng, Xiaodong Yang, Zhiding Yu, Liang Zheng, Yi Yang, and Jan Kautz. Joint discriminative and generative learning for person re-identification. In CVPR,

  101. [109]

    Parameter- efficient person re-identification in the 3D space

    Zhedong Zheng, Nenggan Zheng, and Yi Yang. Parameter- efficient person re-identification in the 3D space. TNNLS,

  102. [110]

    A quality-guided mixture of score-fusion experts framework for human recognition

    Jie Zhu, Yiyang Su, Minchul Kim, Anil Jain, and Xiaom- ing Liu. A quality-guided mixture of score-fusion experts framework for human recognition. In ICCV, 2025. 3

    2025

  103. [111]

    St- moe: Designing stable and transferable sparse expert mod- els

    Barret Zoph, Irwan Bello, Sameer Kumar, Nan Du, Yanping Huang, Jeff Dean, Noam Shazeer, and William Fedus. St- moe: Designing stable and transferable sparse expert mod- els. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.08906, 2022. 3 ���� ���� ���� ���� ���� ���� ���� ���� ���� ���� ���� ���� ��...

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.