Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 3 cited by

Geometric Landau Analysis and Symbol Bootstrap

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read The paper proposes that the boundary structure of negative geometries—geometric objects for Wilson loops with a Lagrangian insertion—determines which singularities of the associated integral are physical, and uses this to compute symbol alp

desk verdict The abstract promises a genuinely new geometric tool for symbol alphabets, but the supplied record contains the wrong paper, so none of the technical claims can be checked. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.05443 v1 pith:V7W3ETNH submitted 2025-08-07 hep-th

classification hep-th
keywords N=4superYang-MillspositivegeometrynegativegeometriesLandauequationssymbolalphabetbootstrapWilsonloopwithLagrangianinsertionladderintegrals
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the positive geometry of loop integrands can be used to predict the analytic structure of the integrated result, not just the integrand. The authors combine the maximal-codimension boundary structure of negative geometries—geometric objects for Wilson loops with a Lagrangian insertion—with a Landau analysis, using the boundaries to decide which Landau solutions are physical singularities. This geometric Landau analysis yields the symbol alphabet of the integral. They apply it successfully to the six-point two-loop and five-point three-loop ladder negative geometries, obtaining their symbol alphabets, and conjecture the two-loop alphabet for all multiplicities. If the method is correct, it turns a hard integration problem into a geometric boundary-counting problem.

What carries the argument

The central object is the negative geometry, a positive-geometry object whose maximal codimension boundaries are taken to encode all leading singularities of the integral. The key mechanism is the geometric Landau analysis: each boundary is mapped to a Landau diagram, and the existence or absence of the boundary determines whether the corresponding solution of the Landau equations is physical (a genuine singularity) or spurious. This boundary-to-Landau correspondence is what turns geometry into a tool for predicting symbol alphabets.

What would settle it

Compute the full symbol of the six-point two-loop ladder integral by an independent method, such as differential equations, and compare its letters one by one with the alphabet produced by the geometric Landau analysis; any letter that appears in one but not the other would show the boundary structure does not determine the symbol alphabet.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the maximal codimension boundaries of a negative geometry completely characterize all possible leading singularities of the associated Wilson-loop-with-Lagrangian-insertion integral. By associating Landau diagrams to these boundaries, the authors obtain a geometric criterion that distinguishes physical singularities from spurious solutions of the Landau equations. Applying this criterion, they compute the symbol alphabets for the six-point two-loop and five-point three-loop ladder negative geometries, and present a conjectural alphabet for ladder negative geometries at two loops for all multiplicities. The method is presented as a starting point for symbol bootstrap

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes that every physical singularity of the integral appears as a maximal codimension boundary of the negative geometry, and that every boundary corresponds to a genuine Landau singularity, so the boundary data are complete and free of spurious entries.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The symbol alphabet of a negative-geometry integral is fully determined by its maximal codimension boundaries, avoiding direct loop integration.
  • The six-point two-loop and five-point three-loop ladder negative geometries now have explicit symbol alphabets, providing new inputs for symbol bootstrap programs.
  • The conjectural two-loop alphabet for all multiplicities gives a concrete target for future higher-point computations.
  • Negative geometries can serve as a starting point for the full Wilson loop with Lagrangian insertion, constraining its function space.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the boundary-to-Landau dictionary is general, the same approach could be applied to other positive geometries beyond negative geometries, potentially yielding symbol alphabets for amplituhedron-type objects.
  • The geometric selection of physical singularities may have a cohomological interpretation, linking the boundaries to relative periods and possibly automating alphabet construction.
  • A direct check against a known symbol, such as a lower-loop case, would test whether the boundary characterization is complete before relying on the higher-loop predictions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript, as represented by its abstract, proposes a method that combines the maximal-codimension boundary structure of negative geometries with a geometrically informed Landau analysis to determine which solutions to the Landau equations are physical, and thereby to compute symbol alphabets for Wilson loops with a Lagrangian insertion in N=4 super Yang-Mills theory. The abstract reports successful application to six-point two-loop and five-point three-loop ladder negative geometries, and a conjectural two-loop all-multiplicity alphabet. However, the submitted full text is arXiv:2508.05444, an unrelated paper on Krylov complexity, rather than the paper described in the abstract. Consequently, the present record contains no definitions, derivations, boundary stratifications, Landau analysis, or computed symbol alphabets, and the central claims cannot be technically evaluated.

Significance. If correct, the proposed geometric Landau analysis would be a valuable tool: it would turn maximal-codimension boundary data of negative geometries into a criterion for filtering spurious Landau solutions, thereby providing an efficient route to symbol alphabets for integrated Wilson loops and informing the symbol bootstrap. The claimed concrete outputs—explicit alphabets for two-loop six-point and three-loop five-point ladders, plus a conjectural all-multiplicity alphabet—would be falsifiable benchmarks. No such outputs or any technical support appear in the record, and the manuscript as submitted cannot be assessed for correctness. The conceptual direction is interesting, but the contribution is currently unsupported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text (mismatch)] The submitted full text is arXiv:2508.05444 ('Krylov exponents and power spectra for maximal quantum chaos'), not the paper described in the abstract (arXiv:2508.05443). None of the technical content mentioned in the abstract—negative geometries, boundary stratifications, Landau equations, symbol computations—is present. The central claims, in particular the computed six-point two-loop and five-point three-loop ladder symbol alphabets, cannot be checked or reproduced. This is a load-bearing deficiency: the manuscript must be replaced with the correct paper before review can proceed.
  2. [Abstract, key premise] The decisive premise is that 'all maximal codimension boundaries of the geometry ... characterize all possible leading singularities of the integral' and that the boundary structure determines which solutions to the Landau equations are physical. This premise is asserted without derivation. If a physical singularity is not represented by a maximal-codimension boundary, or if a geometric boundary corresponds to a spurious Landau solution, the resulting symbol alphabet will be incomplete or polluted. The abstract offers no formal statement of the boundary-to-Landau correspondence, no algorithm, and no argument for sufficiency. A precise theorem or a detailed worked example is needed to support the method.
  3. [Abstract, computational claims] The claimed computations—six-point two-loop and five-point three-loop ladder alphabets, and the conjectural two-loop all-multiplicity alphabet—are not present in the record. No symbol alphabets, integration results, numerical checks, or code are provided. This prevents verification against direct integration or existing symbol data. If the correct manuscript is supplied, it must include these explicit outputs and, ideally, a comparison with known results or a reproducibility statement.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The terms 'negative geometries' and 'symbol alphabet' are used without definitions; a brief definition or reference would help readers outside the positive-geometry subfield.
  2. [Abstract] The typesetting 'N{=}4' should be '\( \mathcal{N}=4 \)' to render correctly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity established from the supplied record; the technical derivation is absent, so no input-output equivalence can be exhibited.

full rationale

The abstract of arXiv:2508.05443 claims that maximal codimension boundaries of negative geometries, combined with Landau analysis, determine physical singularities and symbol alphabets for ladder integrals. For this to be circular we would need to exhibit, from the paper's own equations, either that the boundary stratification is defined in terms of the symbol alphabet it purports to predict, or that a fitted/renamed quantity is called a prediction. The supplied full text, however, is not the target paper but arXiv:2508.05444 (Krylov exponents and EFT of maximal chaos), so none of the definitions of negative geometries, the boundary-to-Landau dictionary, or the two-loop/three-loop symbol computations are available for inspection. No equation, definition, or self-citation is provided to show that the boundary input already contains the output singularities. The abstract's premise that boundaries characterize leading singularities is an unverified assumption and a potential correctness risk, but an unverified assumption without an exhibited reduction is not circularity under the hard rules. Therefore the honest finding is no significant circularity (score 0), with the caveat that the derivation chain itself cannot be audited from this record.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted constants are visible from the abstract. The construction leans on the established positive-geometry framework for planar N=4 SYM and on the assumption that boundary data control Landau singularities. I list the latter as an axiom because it is the novel mechanism; if the full text shows it is derived rather than assumed, this entry should be downgraded. No new physical entities, particles, or forces are announced in the abstract.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Planar N=4 SYM loop integrands admit a positive geometry description; Wilson loops with a Lagrangian insertion have a geometric expansion into negative geometries.
    Entire paper is situated in this framework; abstract says 'extending ideas previously used for scattering amplitudes related to the Amplituhedron'.
  • domain assumption All maximal codimension boundaries of a negative geometry characterize all possible leading singularities of the integral.
    Central mechanism; if false, the Landau filtering may miss or add symbol letters.
  • domain assumption Landau equations, together with geometric boundary selection, correctly classify physical versus spurious singularities.
    Landau analysis is a standard technique; the geometric selection rule is the paper's proposed refinement and is unproven at abstract level.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Geometric Landau Analysis and Symbol Bootstrap." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V7W3ETNH

@misc{pith2026250805443,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Geometric Landau Analysis and Symbol Bootstrap},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V7W3ETNH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.05443}
}
abstract

We investigate how the positive geometry framework for loop integrands in $\mathcal{N}{=}4$ super Yang-Mills theory constrains the structure of the integrated answers. This is done in the context of a geometric expansion of Wilson loops with a Lagrangian insertion, called negative geometries, extending ideas previously used for scattering amplitudes related to the Amplituhedron. The procedure we adopt combines the knowledge of all maximal codimension boundaries of the geometry, which characterize all possible leading singularities of the integral, with a geometrically informed Landau analysis. The interplay between geometry and Landau analysis arises from associating Landau diagrams to geometric boundaries. The boundary structure of the geometry then determines which solutions to the Landau equations are spurious and which ones are physical, that is, which singularities are actually present in the integral. This method allows us to efficiently determine the symbol alphabet of the associated integral, and serves as a starting point for the symbol bootstrap. We successfully implement this procedure and compute the six-point two-loop and five-point three-loop ladder negative geometries at the symbol level. We also present the conjectural alphabet for ladder negative geometries at two loops for all multiplicities. These are finite integrals that serve as building blocks for the Wilson loop with Lagrangian insertion, and therefore provide insights into the function space of the latter.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Landau Analysis of One-Cycle Negative Geometries

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    One-cycle negative geometries in N=4 SYM have singularities only at z=-1, 0, and infinity to all loop orders.

  2. QCD Scattering Amplitudes and Prescriptive Unitarity

    hep-th 2026-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The maximally-transcendental part of planar two-loop six-gluon MHV QCD amplitudes is bootstrapped at symbol level and expressed in a 137-letter alphabet.

  3. Multi-Loop Negative Geometries

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Explicit three-loop computation of negative geometries for F(g,z) with all-loop resummation of one-cycle diagrams and extraction of the cusp anomalous dimension via z-integration.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

148 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION blank.sep after.quote 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry output.state after.quoted.block = 'skip 'add.period if write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip output.state after.quote = after.quoted.block 'output.state := after.block 'output.state := if if FUNCTION new.sentence out...

  2. [2]

    Arkani-Hamed, F

    N. Arkani-Hamed, F. Cachazo and J. Kaplan, What is the Simplest Quantum Field Theory? , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2010)016 JHEP 09 (2010) 016 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/0808.1446 0808.1446 ]

  3. [3]

    Arkani-Hamed, L

    N. Arkani-Hamed, L. J. Dixon, A. J. McLeod, M. Spradlin, J. Trnka and A. Volovich, Solving Scattering in N = 4 Super-Yang-Mills Theory , http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.10636 2207.10636

  4. [4]

    Travaglini et al., The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes , http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ac8380 J

    G. Travaglini et al., The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes , http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ac8380 J. Phys. A 55 (2022) 443001 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.13011 2203.13011 ]

  5. [5]

    L. F. Alday and J. M. Maldacena, Gluon scattering amplitudes at strong coupling , http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2007/06/064 JHEP 06 (2007) 064 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/0705.0303 0705.0303 ]

  6. [6]

    J. M. Drummond, J. Henn, G. P. Korchemsky and E. Sokatchev, Dual superconformal symmetry of scattering amplitudes in N=4 super-Yang-Mills theory , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2009.11.022 Nucl. Phys. B 828 (2010) 317--374 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/0807.1095 0807.1095 ]

  7. [7]

    J. M. Drummond, J. M. Henn and J. Plefka, Yangian symmetry of scattering amplitudes in N=4 super Yang-Mills theory , http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2009/05/046 JHEP 05 (2009) 046 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/0902.2987 0902.2987 ]

  8. [8]

    Arkani-Hamed, J

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, S. Caron-Huot and J. Trnka, The All-Loop Integrand For Scattering Amplitudes in Planar N=4 SYM , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2011)041 JHEP 01 (2011) 041 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.2958 1008.2958 ]

Show all 148 references
  1. [9]

    Arkani-Hamed and J

    N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Trnka, The Amplituhedron , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2014)030 JHEP 10 (2014) 030 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.2007 1312.2007 ]

  2. [10]

    Arkani-Hamed, F

    N. Arkani-Hamed, F. Cachazo, C. Cheung and J. Kaplan, A Duality For The S Matrix , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2010)020 JHEP 03 (2010) 020 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/0907.5418 0907.5418 ]

  3. [11]

    Arkani-Hamed, J

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, A. B. Goncharov, A. Postnikov and J. Trnka, Grassmannian Geometry of Scattering Amplitudes . Cambridge University Press, 4, 2016. 10.1017/CBO9781316091548

  4. [12]

    A. B. Goncharov, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu and A. Volovich, Classical Polylogarithms for Amplitudes and Wilson Loops , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.151605 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 151605 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.5703 1006.5703 ]

  5. [13]

    Golden, A

    J. Golden, A. B. Goncharov, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu and A. Volovich, Motivic Amplitudes and Cluster Coordinates , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2014)091 JHEP 01 (2014) 091 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.1617 1305.1617 ]

  6. [14]

    Golden, M

    J. Golden, M. F. Paulos, M. Spradlin and A. Volovich, Cluster Polylogarithms for Scattering Amplitudes , http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/47/47/474005 J. Phys. A 47 (2014) 474005 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.6446 1401.6446 ]

  7. [15]

    Arkani-Hamed and J

    N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Trnka, Into the Amplituhedron , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2014)182 JHEP 12 (2014) 182 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.7878 1312.7878 ]

  8. [16]

    Arkani-Hamed, H

    N. Arkani-Hamed, H. Thomas and J. Trnka, Unwinding the Amplituhedron in Binary , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2018)016 JHEP 01 (2018) 016 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1704.05069 1704.05069 ]

  9. [17]

    Damgaard, L

    D. Damgaard, L. Ferro, T. Lukowski and M. Parisi, The Momentum Amplituhedron , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2019)042 JHEP 08 (2019) 042 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1905.04216 1905.04216 ]

  10. [18]

    Ferro and T

    L. Ferro and T. Lukowski, The Loop Momentum Amplituhedron , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2023)183 JHEP 05 (2023) 183 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.01127 2210.01127 ]

  11. [19]

    Z. Bern, E. Herrmann, S. Litsey, J. Stankowicz and J. Trnka, Evidence for a Nonplanar Amplituhedron , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2016)098 JHEP 06 (2016) 098 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.08591 1512.08591 ]

  12. [20]

    Ferro, T

    L. Ferro, T. ukowski and M. Parisi, Amplituhedron meets Jeffrey Kirwan residue , http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aaf3c3 J. Phys. A 52 (2019) 045201 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1805.01301 1805.01301 ]

  13. [21]

    Arkani-Hamed, C

    N. Arkani-Hamed, C. Langer, A. Yelleshpur Srikant and J. Trnka, Deep Into the Amplituhedron: Amplitude Singularities at All Loops and Legs , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.051601 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 051601 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.08208 1810.08208 ]

  14. [22]

    Lukowski, M

    T. Lukowski, M. Parisi and L. K. Williams, The Positive Tropical Grassmannian, the Hypersimplex, and the m = 2 Amplituhedron , http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rnad010 Int. Math. Res. Not. 2023 (2023) 16778--16836 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.06164 2002.06164 ]

  15. [23]

    Herrmann, C

    E. Herrmann, C. Langer, J. Trnka and M. Zheng, Positive geometry, local triangulations, and the dual of the Amplituhedron , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2021)035 JHEP 01 (2021) 035 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.05607 2009.05607 ]

  16. [24]

    Dian and P

    G. Dian and P. Heslop, Amplituhedron-like geometries , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2021)074 JHEP 11 (2021) 074 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.09372 2106.09372 ]

  17. [25]

    Arkani-Hamed, J

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. Henn and J. Trnka, Nonperturbative negative geometries: amplitudes at strong coupling and the amplituhedron , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2022)108 JHEP 03 (2022) 108 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.06956 2112.06956 ]

  18. [26]

    G. Dian, P. Heslop and A. Stewart, Internal boundaries of the loop amplituhedron , http://dx.doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.3.098 SciPost Phys. 15 (2023) 098 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.12464 2207.12464 ]

  19. [27]

    Paranjape, J

    S. Paranjape, J. Trnka and M. Zheng, Non-planar BCFW Grassmannian geometries , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2022)084 JHEP 12 (2022) 084 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.02262 2208.02262 ]

  20. [28]

    T. V. Brown, U. Oktem, S. Paranjape and J. Trnka, Loops of loops expansion in the amplituhedron , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2024)025 JHEP 07 (2024) 025 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.17736 2312.17736 ]

  21. [29]

    Arkani-Hamed, W

    N. Arkani-Hamed, W. Flieger, J. M. Henn, A. Schreiber and J. Trnka, Coulomb Branch Amplitudes from a Deformed Amplituhedron Geometry , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.211601 Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 211601 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.10814 2311.10814 ]

  22. [30]

    Even-Zohar, T

    C. Even-Zohar, T. Lakrec, M. Parisi, M. Sherman-Bennett, R. Tessler and L. Williams, A cluster of results on amplituhedron tiles , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11005-024-01854-4 Lett. Math. Phys. 114 (2024) 111 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15568 2402.15568 ]

  23. [31]

    Ferro, R

    L. Ferro, R. Glew, T. Lukowski and J. Stalknecht, The two-loop MHV momentum amplituhedron from fibrations of fibrations , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2025)044 JHEP 02 (2025) 044 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.12906 2407.12906 ]

  24. [32]

    Flieger, J

    W. Flieger, J. Henn, A. Schreiber and J. Trnka, Two-loop four-point amplitudes on the Coulomb branch of N = 4 super Yang-Mills , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2025)116 JHEP 04 (2025) 116 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.09454 2501.09454 ]

  25. [33]

    Even-Zohar, T

    C. Even-Zohar, T. Lakrec, M. Parisi, M. Sherman-Bennett, R. Tessler and L. Williams, BCFW tilings and cluster adjacency for the amplituhedron , http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2408572122 Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 122 (2025) e2408572122 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.01217 2504.01217 ]

  26. [34]

    Koefler and R

    J. Koefler and R. Sinn, Taking the amplituhedron to the limit , http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.08221 2501.08221

  27. [35]

    Arkani-Hamed, Y

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Y. Bai, S. He and G. Yan, Scattering Forms and the Positive Geometry of Kinematics, Color and the Worldsheet , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2018)096 JHEP 05 (2018) 096 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.09102 1711.09102 ]

  28. [36]

    Arkani-Hamed, H

    N. Arkani-Hamed, H. Frost, G. Salvatori, P.-G. Plamondon and H. Thomas, All Loop Scattering For All Multiplicity , http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09284 2311.09284

  29. [37]

    Arkani-Hamed, Q

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Q. Cao, J. Dong, C. Figueiredo and S. He, Scalar-Scaffolded Gluons and the Combinatorial Origins of Yang-Mills Theory , http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00041 2401.00041

  30. [38]

    He, C.-K

    S. He, C.-K. Kuo, Z. Li and Y.-Q. Zhang, All-Loop Four-Point Aharony-Bergman-Jafferis-Maldacena Amplitudes from Dimensional Reduction of the Amplituhedron , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.221604 Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022) 221604 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.08297 ...

  31. [39]

    He, Y.-t

    S. He, Y.-t. Huang and C.-K. Kuo, The ABJM Amplituhedron , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2023)165 JHEP 09 (2023) 165 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.00951 2306.00951 ]

  32. [40]

    B. Eden, P. Heslop and L. Mason, The Correlahedron , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2017)156 JHEP 09 (2017) 156 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1701.00453 1701.00453 ]

  33. [41]

    He, Y.-t

    S. He, Y.-t. Huang and C.-K. Kuo, All-loop geometry for four-point correlation functions , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.L081701 Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) L081701 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.20292 2405.20292 ]

  34. [42]

    He, Y.-t

    S. He, Y.-t. Huang and C.-K. Kuo, Leading singularities and chambers of Correlahedron , http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09808 2505.09808

  35. [43]

    Arkani-Hamed, P

    N. Arkani-Hamed, P. Benincasa and A. Postnikov, Cosmological Polytopes and the Wavefunction of the Universe , http://arxiv.org/abs/1709.02813 1709.02813

  36. [44]

    Arkani-Hamed, C

    N. Arkani-Hamed, C. Figueiredo and F. Vaz\ ao, Cosmohedra , http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.19881 2412.19881

  37. [45]

    Arkani-Hamed, Y

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Y. Bai and T. Lam, Positive Geometries and Canonical Forms , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2017)039 JHEP 11 (2017) 039 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.04541 1703.04541 ]

  38. [46]

    Herrmann and J

    E. Herrmann and J. Trnka, The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes Chapter 7: Positive geometry of scattering amplitudes , http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ac8709 J. Phys. A 55 (2022) 443008 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.13018 2203.13018 ]

  39. [47]

    Ranestad, B

    K. Ranestad, B. Sturmfels and S. Telen, What is Positive Geometry? , http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.12815 2502.12815

  40. [48]

    Fevola and A.-L

    C. Fevola and A.-L. Sattelberger, Algebraic and Positive Geometry of the Universe: from Particles to Galaxies , http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.13582 2502.13582

  41. [49]

    J. M. Henn, Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.251601 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 251601 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.1806 1304.1806 ]

  42. [50]

    J. M. Henn, Lectures on differential equations for Feynman integrals , http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/48/15/153001 J. Phys. A 48 (2015) 153001 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.2296 1412.2296 ]

  43. [51]

    C. Duhr, H. Gangl and J. R. Rhodes, From polygons and symbols to polylogarithmic functions , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2012)075 JHEP 10 (2012) 075 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.0458 1110.0458 ]

  44. [52]

    L. J. Dixon, J. M. Drummond and J. M. Henn, Bootstrapping the three-loop hexagon , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2011)023 JHEP 11 (2011) 023 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.4461 1108.4461 ]

  45. [53]

    L. J. Dixon, J. M. Drummond, C. Duhr, M. von Hippel and J. Pennington, Bootstrapping six-gluon scattering in planar N=4 super-Yang-Mills theory , http://dx.doi.org/10.22323/1.211.0077 PoS LL2014 (2014) 077 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.4724 1407.4724 ]

  46. [54]

    L. J. Dixon and M. von Hippel, Bootstrapping an NMHV amplitude through three loops , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2014)065 JHEP 10 (2014) 065 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1408.1505 1408.1505 ]

  47. [55]

    J. M. Drummond, G. Papathanasiou and M. Spradlin, A Symbol of Uniqueness: The Cluster Bootstrap for the 3-Loop MHV Heptagon , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2015)072 JHEP 03 (2015) 072 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.3763 1412.3763 ]

  48. [56]

    L. J. Dixon, M. von Hippel and A. J. McLeod, The four-loop six-gluon NMHV ratio function , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2016)053 JHEP 01 (2016) 053 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.08127 1509.08127 ]

  49. [57]

    Caron-Huot, L

    S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, A. McLeod and M. von Hippel, Bootstrapping a Five-Loop Amplitude Using Steinmann Relations , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.241601 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 241601 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1609.00669 1609.00669 ]

  50. [58]

    L. J. Dixon, J. Drummond, T. Harrington, A. J. McLeod, G. Papathanasiou and M. Spradlin, Heptagons from the Steinmann Cluster Bootstrap , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2017)137 JHEP 02 (2017) 137 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1612.08976 1612.08976 ]

  51. [59]

    O . G \

    J. Drummond, J. Foster, \" O . G \" u rdo g an and G. Papathanasiou, Cluster adjacency and the four-loop NMHV heptagon , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2019)087 JHEP 03 (2019) 087 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.04640 1812.04640 ]

  52. [60]

    Caron-Huot, L

    S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, F. Dulat, M. von Hippel, A. J. McLeod and G. Papathanasiou, Six-Gluon amplitudes in planar N = 4 super-Yang-Mills theory at six and seven loops , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2019)016 JHEP 08 (2019) 016 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1903.10890 1903.10890 ]

  53. [61]

    Caron-Huot, L

    S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, F. Dulat, M. von Hippel, A. J. McLeod and G. Papathanasiou, The Cosmic Galois Group and Extended Steinmann Relations for Planar N = 4 SYM Amplitudes , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2019)061 JHEP 09 (2019) 061 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1906.07116 1...

  54. [62]

    Caron-Huot, L

    S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, J. M. Drummond, F. Dulat, J. Foster, O. G\"urdo g an, M. von Hippel, A. J. McLeod and G. Papathanasiou, The Steinmann Cluster Bootstrap for N = 4 Super Yang-Mills Amplitudes , http://dx.doi.org/10.22323/1.376.0003 PoS CORFU2019 (2020) 003 , [ http:/...

  55. [63]

    J. M. Henn, What Can We Learn About QCD and Collider Physics from N=4 Super Yang Mills? , http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-102819-100428 Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 71 (2021) 87--112 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.00361 2006.00361 ]

  56. [64]

    Dennen, M

    T. Dennen, M. Spradlin and A. Volovich, Landau Singularities and Symbology: One- and Two-loop MHV Amplitudes in SYM Theory , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2016)069 JHEP 03 (2016) 069 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.07909 1512.07909 ]

  57. [65]

    Dennen, I

    T. Dennen, I. Prlina, M. Spradlin, S. Stanojevic and A. Volovich, Landau Singularities from the Amplituhedron , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2017)152 JHEP 06 (2017) 152 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1612.02708 1612.02708 ]

  58. [66]

    Prlina, M

    I. Prlina, M. Spradlin, J. Stankowicz, S. Stanojevic and A. Volovich, All-Helicity Symbol Alphabets from Unwound Amplituhedra , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2018)159 JHEP 05 (2018) 159 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.11507 1711.11507 ]

  59. [67]

    Prlina, M

    I. Prlina, M. Spradlin, J. Stankowicz and S. Stanojevic, Boundaries of Amplituhedra and NMHV Symbol Alphabets at Two Loops , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2018)049 JHEP 04 (2018) 049 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.08049 1712.08049 ]

  60. [68]

    L. F. Alday, E. I. Buchbinder and A. A. Tseytlin, Correlation function of null polygonal Wilson loops with local operators , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2011)034 JHEP 09 (2011) 034 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1107.5702 1107.5702 ]

  61. [69]

    L. F. Alday, P. Heslop and J. Sikorowski, Perturbative correlation functions of null Wilson loops and local operators , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2013)074 JHEP 03 (2013) 074 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.4316 1207.4316 ]

  62. [70]

    L. F. Alday, J. M. Henn and J. Sikorowski, Higher loop mixed correlators in N=4 SYM , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2013)058 JHEP 03 (2013) 058 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.0149 1301.0149 ]

  63. [71]

    O. T. Engelund and R. Roiban, On correlation functions of Wilson loops, local and non-local operators , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2012)158 JHEP 05 (2012) 158 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.0758 1110.0758 ]

  64. [72]

    O. T. Engelund and R. Roiban, Correlation functions of local composite operators from generalized unitarity , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2013)172 JHEP 03 (2013) 172 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.0227 1209.0227 ]

  65. [73]

    J. M. Henn, G. P. Korchemsky and B. Mistlberger, The full four-loop cusp anomalous dimension in N =4 super Yang-Mills and QCD , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2020)018 JHEP 04 (2020) 018 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1911.10174 1911.10174 ]

  66. [74]

    Chicherin and J

    D. Chicherin and J. M. Henn, Symmetry properties of Wilson loops with a Lagrangian insertion , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2022)057 JHEP 07 (2022) 057 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.05596 2202.05596 ]

  67. [75]

    Chicherin and J

    D. Chicherin and J. Henn, Pentagon Wilson loop with Lagrangian insertion at two loops in N = 4 super Yang-Mills theory , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2022)038 JHEP 07 (2022) 038 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.00329 2204.00329 ]

  68. [76]

    Chicherin, J

    D. Chicherin, J. Henn, J. Trnka and S.-Q. Zhang, Positivity properties of five-point two-loop Wilson loops with Lagrangian insertion , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2025)022 JHEP 04 (2025) 022 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.11456 2410.11456 ]

  69. [77]

    Carr\^olo, D

    S. Carr\^olo, D. Chicherin, J. Henn, Q. Yang and Y. Zhang, Hexagonal Wilson loop with Lagrangian insertion at two loops in N =4 super Yang-Mills theory , http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.01245 2505.01245

  70. [78]

    Abreu, D

    S. Abreu, D. Chicherin, V. Sotnikov and S. Zoia, Two-loop five-point two-mass planar integrals and double Lagrangian insertions in a Wilson loop , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2024)167 JHEP 10 (2024) 167 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.05201 2408.05201 ]

  71. [79]

    J. M. Drummond, G. P. Korchemsky and E. Sokatchev, Conformal properties of four-gluon planar amplitudes and Wilson loops , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2007.11.041 Nucl. Phys. B 795 (2008) 385--408 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/0707.0243 0707.0243 ]

  72. [80]

    Brandhuber, P

    A. Brandhuber, P. Heslop and G. Travaglini, MHV amplitudes in N=4 super Yang-Mills and Wilson loops , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2007.11.002 Nucl. Phys. B 794 (2008) 231--243 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/0707.1153 0707.1153 ]

  73. [81]

    T. V. Brown, J. M. Henn, E. Mazzucchelli and J. Trnka, All-loop Leading Singularities of Wilson Loops , http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.17185 2503.17185

  74. [82]

    Chicherin, J

    D. Chicherin, J. Henn and V. Mitev, Bootstrapping pentagon functions , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2018)164 JHEP 05 (2018) 164 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.09610 1712.09610 ]

  75. [83]

    Gehrmann, J

    T. Gehrmann, J. M. Henn and N. A. Lo Presti, Pentagon functions for massless planar scattering amplitudes , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2018)103 JHEP 10 (2018) 103 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1807.09812 1807.09812 ]

  76. [84]

    J. Henn, T. Peraro, Y. Xu and Y. Zhang, A first look at the function space for planar two-loop six-particle Feynman integrals , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2022)056 JHEP 03 (2022) 056 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.10605 2112.10605 ]

  77. [85]

    J. M. Henn, A. Matija s i\'c, J. Miczajka, T. Peraro, Y. Xu and Y. Zhang, A computation of two-loop six-point Feynman integrals in dimensional regularization , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2024)027 JHEP 08 (2024) 027 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.19742 2403.19742 ]

  78. [86]

    Y. Liu, A. Matija s i \'c , J. Miczajka, Y. Xu, Y. Xu and Y. Zhang, Analytic computation of three-loop five-point Feynman integrals , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/qrk2-cym5 Phys. Rev. D 112 (2025) 016021 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.18697 2411.18697 ]

  79. [87]

    Abreu, P

    S. Abreu, P. F. Monni, B. Page and J. Usovitsch, Planar six-point Feynman integrals for four-dimensional gauge theories , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2025)112 JHEP 06 (2025) 112 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.19884 2412.19884 ]

  80. [88]

    J. Henn, A. Matija s i \'c , J. Miczajka, T. Peraro, Y. Xu and Y. Zhang, Complete Function Space for Planar Two-Loop Six-Particle Scattering Amplitudes , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/zhzd-tj9p Phys. Rev. Lett. 135 (2025) 031601 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.01847 2501.01847 ]

  81. [89]

    Arkani-Hamed, T

    N. Arkani-Hamed, T. Lam and M. Spradlin, Non-perturbative geometries for planar N = 4 SYM amplitudes , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2021)065 JHEP 03 (2021) 065 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1912.08222 1912.08222 ]

  82. [90]

    Drummond, J

    J. Drummond, J. Foster, O. G\"urdogan and C. Kalousios, Tropical Grassmannians, cluster algebras and scattering amplitudes , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2020)146 JHEP 04 (2020) 146 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.01053 1907.01053 ]

  83. [91]

    Henke and G

    N. Henke and G. Papathanasiou, How tropical are seven- and eight-particle amplitudes? , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2020)005 JHEP 08 (2020) 005 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1912.08254 1912.08254 ]

  84. [92]

    Drummond, J

    J. Drummond, J. Foster, O. G\"urdogan and C. Kalousios, Algebraic singularities of scattering amplitudes from tropical geometry , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2021)002 JHEP 04 (2021) 002 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1912.08217 1912.08217 ]

  85. [93]

    Chicherin, J

    D. Chicherin, J. M. Henn and G. Papathanasiou, Cluster algebras for Feynman integrals , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.091603 Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 091603 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.12285 2012.12285 ]

  86. [94]

    S. He, Z. Li and Q. Yang, Notes on cluster algebras and some all-loop Feynman integrals , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2021)119 JHEP 06 (2021) 119 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.02796 2103.02796 ]

  87. [95]

    S. He, Z. Li and Q. Yang, Truncated cluster algebras and Feynman integrals with algebraic letters , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2021)110 JHEP 12 (2021) 110 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.09314 2106.09314 ]

  88. [96]

    S. He, Z. Li and Q. Yang, Kinematics, cluster algebras and Feynman integrals , http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.11842 2112.11842

  89. [97]

    Yang, Schubert problems, positivity and symbol letters , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2022)168 JHEP 08 (2022) 168 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.16112 2203.16112 ]

    Q. Yang, Schubert problems, positivity and symbol letters , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2022)168 JHEP 08 (2022) 168 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.16112 2203.16112 ]

  90. [98]

    Dlapa, M

    C. Dlapa, M. Helmer, G. Papathanasiou and F. Tellander, Symbol alphabets from the Landau singular locus , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2023)161 JHEP 10 (2023) 161 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02629 2304.02629 ]

  91. [99]

    S. He, X. Jiang, J. Liu and Q. Yang, On symbology and differential equations of Feynman integrals from Schubert analysis , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2023)140 JHEP 12 (2023) 140 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.16441 2309.16441 ]

  92. [100]

    Jiang, J

    X. Jiang, J. Liu, X. Xu and L. L. Yang, Symbol letters of Feynman integrals from Gram determinants , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139443 Phys. Lett. B 864 (2025) 139443 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.07632 2401.07632 ]

  93. [101]

    Aliaj and G

    R. Aliaj and G. Papathanasiou, An exceptional cluster algebra for Higgs plus jet production , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2025)197 JHEP 01 (2025) 197 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.14544 2408.14544 ]

  94. [102]

    Pokraka, M

    A. Pokraka, M. Spradlin, A. Volovich and H.-C. Weng, Symbol Alphabets in QCD and Flag Cluster Algebras , http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11895 2506.11895

  95. [103]

    Bossinger, J

    L. Bossinger, J. Drummond, R. Glew, \"O . G \"u rdo g an and R. Wright, Singularities of massless scattering and cluster algebras , http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.01015 2507.01015

  96. [104]

    Brandhuber, G

    A. Brandhuber, G. Travaglini and G. Yang, Analytic two-loop form factors in N=4 SYM , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2012)082 JHEP 05 (2012) 082 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.4170 1201.4170 ]

  97. [105]

    L. J. Dixon, A. J. McLeod and M. Wilhelm, A Three-Point Form Factor Through Five Loops , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2021)147 JHEP 04 (2021) 147 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.12286 2012.12286 ]

  98. [106]

    L. J. Dixon, O. Gurdogan, A. J. McLeod and M. Wilhelm, Bootstrapping a stress-tensor form factor through eight loops , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2022)153 JHEP 07 (2022) 153 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.11901 2204.11901 ]

  99. [107]

    L. J. Dixon, O. G\"urdo g an, Y.-T. Liu, A. J. McLeod and M. Wilhelm, Antipodal Self-Duality for a Four-Particle Form Factor , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.111601 Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 111601 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.02410 2212.02410 ]

  100. [108]

    L. J. Dixon and Y.-T. Liu, An eight loop amplitude via antipodal duality , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2023)098 JHEP 09 (2023) 098 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.08199 2308.08199 ]

  101. [109]

    Basso, L

    B. Basso, L. J. Dixon and A. G. Tumanov, The three-point form factor of Tr ^ 3 to six loops , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2025)034 JHEP 02 (2025) 034 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.22402 2410.22402 ]

  102. [110]

    L. D. Landau, On analytic properties of vertex parts in quantum field theory , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-010586-4.50103-6 Nucl. Phys. 13 (1959) 181--192

  103. [111]

    Gehrmann, J

    T. Gehrmann, J. M. Henn and N. A. Lo Presti, Analytic form of the two-loop planar five-gluon all-plus-helicity amplitude in QCD , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.062001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 062001 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.05409 1511.05409 ]

  104. [112]

    Hodges, Eliminating spurious poles from gauge-theoretic amplitudes , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2013)135 JHEP 05 (2013) 135 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/0905.1473 0905.1473 ]

    A. Hodges, Eliminating spurious poles from gauge-theoretic amplitudes , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2013)135 JHEP 05 (2013) 135 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/0905.1473 0905.1473 ]

  105. [113]

    Even-Zohar, T

    C. Even-Zohar, T. Lakrec and R. J. Tessler, The amplituhedron BCFW triangulation , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00222-025-01316-1 Invent. Math. 239 (2025) 1009--1138 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.02703 2112.02703 ]

  106. [114]

    Even-Zohar, T

    C. Even-Zohar, T. Lakrec, M. Parisi, R. Tessler, M. Sherman-Bennett and L. Williams, Cluster algebras and tilings for the m=4 amplituhedron , http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.17727 2310.17727

  107. [115]

    Galashin, Amplituhedra and origami , http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.09574 2410.09574

    P. Galashin, Amplituhedra and origami , http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.09574 2410.09574

  108. [116]

    Ranestad, R

    K. Ranestad, R. Sinn and S. Telen, Adjoints and Canonical Forms of Tree Amplituhedra , http://dx.doi.org/10.7146/math.scand.a-149816 Math. Scand. 130 (2024) 433--466 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.06527 2402.06527 ]

  109. [117]

    R. J. Eden, P. V. Landshoff, D. I. Olive and J. C. Polkinghorne, The analytic S-matrix . Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1966

  110. [118]

    Mizera and S

    S. Mizera and S. Telen, Landau discriminants , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2022)200 JHEP 08 (2022) 200 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.08036 2109.08036 ]

  111. [119]

    H. S. Hannesdottir, A. J. McLeod, M. D. Schwartz and C. Vergu, Implications of the Landau equations for iterated integrals , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.L061701 Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) L061701 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.09744 2109.09744 ]

  112. [120]

    Fevola, S

    C. Fevola, S. Mizera and S. Telen, Principal Landau determinants , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2024.109278 Comput. Phys. Commun. 303 (2024) 109278 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.16219 2311.16219 ]

  113. [121]

    Fevola, S

    C. Fevola, S. Mizera and S. Telen, Landau Singularities Revisited: Computational Algebraic Geometry for Feynman Integrals , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.101601 Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 101601 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.14669 2311.14669 ]

  114. [122]

    Helmer, G

    M. Helmer, G. Papathanasiou and F. Tellander, Landau Singularities from Whitney Stratifications , http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.14787 2402.14787

  115. [123]

    H. S. Hannesdottir, A. J. McLeod, M. D. Schwartz and C. Vergu, Applications of the Landau bootstrap , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.085003 Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 085003 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.02424 2410.02424 ]

  116. [124]

    Caron-Huot, M

    S. Caron-Huot, M. Correia and M. Giroux, Recursive Landau Analysis , http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.05241 2406.05241

  117. [125]

    S. He, X. Jiang, J. Liu and Q. Yang, Landau-based Schubert analysis , http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.11423 2410.11423

  118. [126]

    Correia, M

    M. Correia, M. Giroux and S. Mizera, SOFIA: Singularities of Feynman Integrals Automatized , http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.16601 2503.16601

  119. [127]

    D. B. Fairlie, P. V. Landshoff, J. Nuttall and J. C. Polkinghorne, Singularities of the Second Type , http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1724262 Journal of Mathematical Physics 3 (07, 1962) 594--602 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jmp/article-pdf/3/4/594/19167404/59...

  120. [128]

    Prlina, M

    I. Prlina, M. Spradlin and S. Stanojevic, All-loop singularities of scattering amplitudes in massless planar theories , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.081601 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 081601 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1805.11617 1805.11617 ]

  121. [129]

    Lippstreu, M

    L. Lippstreu, M. Spradlin and A. Volovich, Landau singularities of the 7-point ziggurat. Part I , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2024)024 JHEP 07 (2024) 024 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.16425 2211.16425 ]

  122. [130]

    Lippstreu, M

    L. Lippstreu, M. Spradlin, A. Yelleshpur Srikant and A. Volovich, Landau singularities of the 7-point ziggurat. Part II , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2024)069 JHEP 01 (2024) 069 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.17069 2305.17069 ]

  123. [131]

    Chen, Iterated path integrals , http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9904-1977-14320-6 Bull

    K.-T. Chen, Iterated path integrals , http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9904-1977-14320-6 Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 83 (1977) 831--879

  124. [132]

    Heller, A

    M. Heller, A. von Manteuffel and R. M. Schabinger, Multiple polylogarithms with algebraic arguments and the two-loop EW-QCD Drell-Yan master integrals , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.016025 Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 016025 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.00491 1907.00491 ]

  125. [133]

    Zoia, Modern Analytic Methods for Computing Scattering Amplitudes: With Application to Two-Loop Five-Particle Processes

    S. Zoia, Modern Analytic Methods for Computing Scattering Amplitudes: With Application to Two-Loop Five-Particle Processes . PhD thesis, Aff1= Department of Physics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy, GRID:grid.7605.4, Munich U., Munich U., 2022. 10.1007/978-3-031-01945-6

  126. [134]

    Matija s i\'c

    A. Matija s i\'c. Effortless GitHub repository https://github.com/antonela-matijasic/Effortless/tree/main, 2025

  127. [135]

    J. L. Bourjaily, Positroids, Plabic Graphs, and Scattering Amplitudes in Mathematica , http://arxiv.org/abs/1212.6974 1212.6974

  128. [136]

    Arkani-Hamed, J

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo and J. Trnka, Local Integrals for Planar Scattering Amplitudes , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2012)125 JHEP 06 (2012) 125 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.6032 1012.6032 ]

  129. [137]

    J. M. Henn, A. Matija s i\'c and J. Miczajka, One-loop hexagon integral to higher orders in the dimensional regulator , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2023)096 JHEP 01 (2023) 096 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.13505 2210.13505 ]

  130. [138]

    Caron-Huot and S

    S. Caron-Huot and S. He, Jumpstarting the All-Loop S-Matrix of Planar N=4 Super Yang-Mills , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2012)174 JHEP 07 (2012) 174 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1112.1060 1112.1060 ]

  131. [139]

    Bianchi, S

    M. Bianchi, S. He, Y.-t. Huang and C. Wen, More on Soft Theorems: Trees, Loops and Strings , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.065022 Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 065022 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.5155 1406.5155 ]

  132. [140]

    G. Dian, E. Mazzucchelli and F. Tellander, The two-loop Amplituhedron , http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.11501 2410.11501

  133. [141]

    Glew and T

    R. Glew and T. Lukowski, Positive and negative ladders in loop space , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2025)124 JHEP 06 (2025) 124 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.14989 2411.14989 ]

  134. [142]

    J. L. Bourjaily, S. Caron-Huot and J. Trnka, Dual-Conformal Regularization of Infrared Loop Divergences and the Chiral Box Expansion , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2015)001 JHEP 01 (2015) 001 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.4734 1303.4734 ]

  135. [143]

    J. L. Bourjaily and J. Trnka, Local Integrand Representations of All Two-Loop Amplitudes in Planar SYM , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2015)119 JHEP 08 (2015) 119 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.05886 1505.05886 ]

  136. [144]

    J. L. Bourjaily, E. Herrmann and J. Trnka, Prescriptive Unitarity , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2017)059 JHEP 06 (2017) 059 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/1704.05460 1704.05460 ]

  137. [145]

    J. L. Bourjaily, E. Herrmann, C. Langer and J. Trnka, Building bases of loop integrands , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2020)116 JHEP 11 (2020) 116 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.13905 2007.13905 ]

  138. [146]

    Dlapa, X

    C. Dlapa, X. Li and Y. Zhang, Leading singularities in Baikov representation and Feynman integrals with uniform transcendental weight , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2021)227 JHEP 07 (2021) 227 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.04638 2103.04638 ]

  139. [147]

    S. He, Z. Li, R. Ma, Z. Wu, Q. Yang and Y. Zhang, A study of Feynman integrals with uniform transcendental weights and their symbology , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2022)165 JHEP 10 (2022) 165 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.04609 2206.04609 ]

  140. [148]

    Abreu, H

    S. Abreu, H. Ita, F. Moriello, B. Page, W. Tschernow and M. Zeng, Two-Loop Integrals for Planar Five-Point One-Mass Processes , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2020)117 JHEP 11 (2020) 117 , [ http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04195 2005.04195 ]

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.