pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.05717 · v2 · submitted 2025-08-07 · 💻 cs.CR

On Digital Twins in Defence: Overview and Applications

Marco Giberna , Holger Voos , Paulo Tavares , Jo\~ao Nunes , Tobias Sorg , Andrea Masini , Jose Luis Sanchez-Lopez This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 00:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CR
keywords digital twinsdefense modelingsimulationunified frameworktaxonomyinteroperabilitysecuritysystem integration
0
0 comments X

The pith

Digital twins connect simulation concepts to defense planning, training, and deployment through a unified framework.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper reviews digital twin technology for defense modeling and simulation, showing how it can improve fidelity, interoperability, and decision support. It gathers prior work into one framework that ties digital twin ideas to their use in real defense activities such as planning, training, execution, monitoring, and debriefing. The authors also create a standardized way to describe these twins that matches existing industrial standards, offer a taxonomy of defense use cases, and share results from a questionnaire sent to defense stakeholders and ministries about practical hurdles. The review ends by naming gaps in interoperability, security, and system integration while suggesting directions for future work.

Core claim

The authors consolidate existing research into a unified framework that links digital twin concepts, simulation-driven application, and real-world deployment in defense scenarios. They introduce a standardized digital twin characterization framework suitable for defense applications that aligns with industrial modeling and simulation standards, and present a taxonomy of defense-specific use cases that highlights recurring requirements. Practical evidence comes from a targeted questionnaire to defense stakeholders and Ministries of Defense that reveals current challenges, leading to the identification of key gaps in interoperability, security, and system integration along with future research

What carries the argument

The standardized digital twin characterization framework that aligns with industrial modeling and simulation standards and organizes applications across planning, training, execution, monitoring, and debriefing.

If this is right

  • Digital twins can raise simulation fidelity and support better decisions in defense systems when the unified framework is applied.
  • The taxonomy makes it easier to spot shared requirements across different defense use cases.
  • Filling the identified gaps in interoperability and security would allow smoother real-world integration of these models.
  • Future development can focus on system integration to turn the framework into practical tools for monitoring and debriefing.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Adoption of the characterization framework could help compare digital twin projects across different defense programs more consistently.
  • The questionnaire findings imply that without early attention to security, deployment timelines may stretch beyond current expectations.
  • The taxonomy might serve as a starting point for checking whether new defense simulation tools meet standard requirements.

Load-bearing premise

The surveyed body of literature is representative of the field and the questionnaire responses from targeted defense stakeholders give an accurate picture of current challenges without major selection bias.

What would settle it

A wider set of interviews or data from additional defense organizations that reveals major recurring requirements or challenges absent from the proposed taxonomy and framework would undermine the claim of a representative unified view.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.05717 by Andrea Masini, Holger Voos, Jo\~ao Nunes, Jose Luis Sanchez-Lopez, Marco Giberna, Paulo Tavares, Tobias Sorg.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The conceptual model of Digital Twin. The virtual [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The general modular framework of Digital Twins. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Entities-Based Digital Twin Reference Model. Entities and Sub-Entities are reported in rounded rectangles, some [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Identified characterizations of digital twins in the military field. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Example of system-of-systems digital twin architecture. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Results of the questionnaire, related to current integration of digital twin technologies with the identified cross-domain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Results of the questionnaire, related cross-domain usage of digital twins in the military field. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Results of the questionnaire, related to standardization of digital twin technologies in the military field. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Result of the questionnaire related to integrating digital twins with emerging technologies. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Results of the questionnaire, related to main gaps and current limitations for digital twin technologies development [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Digital twins have emerged as a transformative technology for modeling and simulation in various industries, including defense. This paper provides a comprehensive review of digital twin applications in defense modeling and simulation, focusing on how digital twins can enhance simulation fidelity, interoperability, and decision support within defense systems. We consolidate existing research into a unified framework that links digital twin concepts, simulation-driven application, and real-world deployment in defense scenarios. We discuss the role of digital twin in applications like planning, training, execution and monitoring, and debriefing. We introduce a standardized digital twin characterization framework suitable for defense application that aligns with industrial modeling and simulation standards, and present a taxonomy of defense specific use cases, highlighting recurring requirements. Additionally, practical evidence is provided from a targeted questionnaire distributed to defense stakeholders and Ministries of Defense, revealing current challenges in digital twin integration and deployment. Finally, we conclude by identifying key gaps in digital twins application for defense modeling and simulation, including interoperability, security, and system integration, and we outline future research directions and development opportunities. This review aims to inform defense modeling and simulation practitioners and researchers, guiding future work on digital twin design, implementation and deployment across defense applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. This paper provides a comprehensive review of digital twin applications in defense modeling and simulation. It consolidates existing research into a unified framework linking digital twin concepts, simulation-driven applications, and real-world deployment. The work discusses roles in planning, training, execution, monitoring, and debriefing; introduces a standardized digital twin characterization framework aligned with industrial standards; presents a taxonomy of defense-specific use cases with recurring requirements; supplies practical evidence from a targeted questionnaire to defense stakeholders and Ministries of Defense; and identifies gaps in interoperability, security, and system integration while outlining future research directions.

Significance. If the synthesis holds, the paper delivers a useful unified framework and taxonomy that connects concepts to deployment, strengthened by direct stakeholder input via questionnaire. The alignment with industrial modeling standards and explicit gap analysis in interoperability and security provide actionable guidance for defense practitioners. The inclusion of questionnaire-derived challenges adds empirical grounding beyond pure literature synthesis.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and review methodology description: limited detail is given on literature selection criteria (e.g., databases, keywords, inclusion/exclusion rules) and questionnaire sampling/distribution methodology. This directly affects the strength of the claim that the consolidated research and stakeholder insights form a representative basis for the unified framework and taxonomy.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Taxonomy section] The taxonomy of use cases would be clearer if accompanied by an explicit table or diagram mapping each case to the standardized characterization framework introduced earlier.
  2. [Questionnaire results] Ensure all questionnaire findings are tied back to specific gaps (interoperability, security, integration) with direct quotes or aggregated response statistics for traceability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and positive recommendation for minor revision. We address the concern regarding methodology transparency below to strengthen the manuscript's claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and review methodology description: limited detail is given on literature selection criteria (e.g., databases, keywords, inclusion/exclusion rules) and questionnaire sampling/distribution methodology. This directly affects the strength of the claim that the consolidated research and stakeholder insights form a representative basis for the unified framework and taxonomy.

    Authors: We agree that additional detail on the review and questionnaire methodologies will improve clarity and better support the representativeness of the framework and taxonomy. In the revised manuscript, we will expand the abstract with a concise statement on the systematic review process and add a dedicated subsection (likely in Section 2 or 3) describing the literature search strategy. This will include the databases queried (e.g., Scopus, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science), keywords and Boolean strings employed, publication date range, inclusion/exclusion criteria (peer-reviewed English-language works focused on defense applications), and screening process. For the questionnaire, we will detail the target population (defense stakeholders and Ministries of Defense), distribution channels (professional networks, official defense contacts, and online platforms), sample size, response rate, and any acknowledged limitations in generalizability. These additions will be kept concise while directly addressing the referee's point. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: review synthesizes external literature and new questionnaire data

full rationale

This paper is a literature review and survey-based overview that consolidates cited prior work into a proposed taxonomy and framework while adding fresh input from a targeted stakeholder questionnaire. No mathematical derivations, predictions, or first-principles results are claimed that could reduce to self-definitions, fitted parameters, or self-citation chains. The central claims rest on synthesis of independent external sources plus new empirical input, satisfying the self-contained criterion against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review paper, the central claims rest on the aggregation and synthesis of prior published research in digital twins and defense simulation, plus the outcomes of a new questionnaire distributed to defense stakeholders.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Digital twins can enhance simulation fidelity, interoperability, and decision support within defense systems.
    Invoked throughout the abstract as the foundational motivation for reviewing applications in planning, training, execution, monitoring, and debriefing.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5750 in / 1384 out tokens · 63718 ms · 2026-05-19T00:51:05.738054+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

123 extracted references · 123 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Top Trends in the Gartner Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies, 2017,

    K. Panetta, “Top Trends in the Gartner Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies, 2017,” Aug. 2017, https://www .gartner.com/ smarterwithgartner/top-trends-in-the-gartner-hype-cycle-for- emerging-technologies-2017 [Accessed: 2025-03-21]

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Top Strategic Technology Trends 2023,

    D. Groombridge, “Top Strategic Technology Trends 2023,” 2023, https://emt .gartnerweb.com/ngw/globalassets/en/publications/ documents/2023-gartner-top-strategic-technology-trends-ebook .pdf [Accessed: 2024-05-06]

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Grieves, Virtually perfect: driving innovative and lean products through product lifecycle management

    M. Grieves, Virtually perfect: driving innovative and lean products through product lifecycle management. Cocoa Beach, Florida: Space Coast Press, 2011

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    Digital Twin: Manufacturing Excellence Through Virtual Factory Replication,

    ——, “Digital Twin: Manufacturing Excellence Through Virtual Factory Replication,” 2014

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems,

    M. Grieves and J. Vickers, “Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems,” in Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems , F.-J. Kahlen, S. Flumerfelt, and A. Alves, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. 85–113. [Online]. Available: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7 4

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7 2017

  6. [6]

    Digital Twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification,

    W. Kritzinger, M. Karner, G. Traar, J. Henjes, and W. Sihn, “Digital Twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 1016–1022,

    work page

  7. [7]

    Available: https://linkinghub .elsevier.com/retrieve/ pii/S2405896318316021

    [Online]. Available: https://linkinghub .elsevier.com/retrieve/ pii/S2405896318316021

    work page

  8. [8]

    Digital Twin for maintenance: A literature review,

    I. Errandonea, S. Beltr ´an, and S. Arrizabalaga, “Digital Twin for maintenance: A literature review,”Computers in Industry, vol. 123, p. 103316, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www .sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0166361520305509

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    ISO 23247-2:2021 Automation systems and integration — Digital twin framework for manufacturing,

    “ISO 23247-2:2021 Automation systems and integration — Digital twin framework for manufacturing,” Oct. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/78743.html

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    ISO 23247-3:2021 Automation systems and integration — Digital twin framework for manufacturing,

    “ISO 23247-3:2021 Automation systems and integration — Digital twin framework for manufacturing,” Oct. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/78744.html

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    ISO 23247-4:2021 Automation systems and integration — Digital twin framework for manufacturing,

    “ISO 23247-4:2021 Automation systems and integration — Digital twin framework for manufacturing,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/78745.html

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    ISO 23247-1:2021 Automation systems and integration Digital twin framework for manufacturing,

    “ISO 23247-1:2021 Automation systems and integration Digital twin framework for manufacturing,” Oct. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/75066.html

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    ISO/CD 23247-5 Automation systems and integration — Digital twin framework for manufacturing

    “ISO/CD 23247-5 Automation systems and integration — Digital twin framework for manufacturing.” [Online]. Available: https: //www.iso.org/standard/87425.html

    work page

  14. [14]

    ISO/CD 23247-6 Automation systems and integration — Digital twin framework for manufacturing

    “ISO/CD 23247-6 Automation systems and integration — Digital twin framework for manufacturing.” [Online]. Available: https: //www.iso.org/standard/87426.html

    work page

  15. [15]

    Met SUIT naar waar je wilt,

    E. Brouwer, “Met SUIT naar waar je wilt,” Materieel gezien , vol. 5, 2017, https://magazines .defensie.nl/materieelgezien/2017/05/ mg201705suit [Accessed: 2024-05-30]

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Empowering digital twins with eXtended reality collaborations,

    L. Stacchio, A. Angeli, and G. Marfia, “Empowering digital twins with eXtended reality collaborations,” Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 487–505, Dec. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2096579622000596

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Architecture Framework for Manufacturing System Design,

    N. Benkamoun, W. ElMaraghy, A.-L. Huyet, and K. Kouiss, “Architecture Framework for Manufacturing System Design,” Procedia CIRP , vol. 17, pp. 88–93, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S221282711400359X

    work page 2014

  18. [18]

    A systematic review of system-of-systems architecture research,

    J. Klein and H. Van Vliet, “A systematic review of system-of-systems architecture research,” in Proceedings of the 9th international ACM Sigsoft conference on Quality of software architectures . Vancouver British Columbia Canada: ACM, June 2013, pp. 13–22. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2465478.2465490

    work page doi:10.1145/2465478.2465490 2013

  19. [19]

    Navantia’s Digital Twin Implementation Perspective in Military Naval Platform Life Cycle,

    J. I. Silvera, J. L. Mu ˜noz, J. M. Luquero, A. Cajade, and M. Bustelo, “Navantia’s Digital Twin Implementation Perspective in Military Naval Platform Life Cycle,” 2020

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    KNDS and Arquus to create ‘first digital twin demonstrator for a ground combat system’,

    Peter Felstead, “KNDS and Arquus to create ‘first digital twin demonstrator for a ground combat system’,” Feb. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://euro-sd .com/2024/02/major-news/36516/ knds-arquus-vbci-digital-twin/

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Taking Simulation Interoperabil- ity Standards to the Next Level with Digital Twins,

    S. G. Skinner, “Taking Simulation Interoperabil- ity Standards to the Next Level with Digital Twins,” in STO Meeting Proceedings NATO . [Online]. Available: https://www .sto.nato.int/publications/STO%20Meeting% 20Proceedings/STO-MP-MSG-197/MP-MSG-197-25 .pdf

    work page

  22. [22]

    A System of Systems Digital Twin to Support Life Time Management and Life Extension of Subsea Production Systems,

    E. Altamiranda and E. Colina, “A System of Systems Digital Twin to Support Life Time Management and Life Extension of Subsea Production Systems,” in OCEANS 2019 - Marseille . Marseille, France: IEEE, June 2019, pp. 1–9. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8867187/

    work page arXiv 2019

  23. [23]

    Defence Digital Twin Implementation Road Map and Development Framework,

    “Defence Digital Twin Implementation Road Map and Development Framework,” Mar. 2022, https://www .teamdefence.info/wp-content/ uploads/2022/03/20210121-Digital-Twin-Implementation-Road- Map-and-Development-Framework-White-Paper-V1 .pdf [Accessed: 2024-05-06]

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Digital Twin: Empowering Enterprises Towards a System-of-Systems Approach,

    M. Dietz and G. Pernul, “Digital Twin: Empowering Enterprises Towards a System-of-Systems Approach,” Business & Information Systems Engineering , vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 179–184, Apr. 2020. [Online]. Available: http://link .springer.com/10.1007/s12599-019- 00624-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s12599-019- 2020

  25. [25]

    Digital Twin Sys- tem Interoperability Framework,

    B. Anto and M. Doug, “Digital Twin Sys- tem Interoperability Framework,” Dec. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www .digitaltwinconsortium.org/pdf/Digital-Twin- System-Interoperability-Framework-12072021 .pdf

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    Digital twin technologies and smart cities,

    M. Farsi, A. Daneshkhah, A. Hosseinian-Far, H. Jahankhani, et al. , “Digital twin technologies and smart cities,” 2020

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    A digital twin smart city for citizen feedback,

    G. White, A. Zink, L. Codec ´a, and S. Clarke, “A digital twin smart city for citizen feedback,” Cities, vol. 110, p. 103064, 2021

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    A systematic review of a digital twin city: A new pattern of urban governance toward smart cities,

    T. Deng, K. Zhang, and Z.-J. M. Shen, “A systematic review of a digital twin city: A new pattern of urban governance toward smart cities,” Journal of Management Science and Engineering , vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 125–134, 2021

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Smart city digital twins,

    N. Mohammadi and J. E. Taylor, “Smart city digital twins,” in 2017 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) . IEEE, 2017, pp. 1–5

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Smart city based on digital twins,

    L. Deren, Y . Wenbo, and S. Zhenfeng, “Smart city based on digital twins,” Computational Urban Science , vol. 1, pp. 1–11, 2021

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    Localization and mapping for robots in agriculture and forestry: A survey,

    A. S. Aguiar, F. N. Dos Santos, J. B. Cunha, H. Sobreira, and A. J. Sousa, “Localization and mapping for robots in agriculture and forestry: A survey,” Robotics, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 97, 2020

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Artificial intelligence and digital twins in sustainable agriculture and forestry: a survey,

    J. Nie, Y . Wang, Y . Li, and X. Chao, “Artificial intelligence and digital twins in sustainable agriculture and forestry: a survey,”Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry , vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 642–661, 2022

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    A proposal for a forest digital twin framework and its perspectives,

    L. Buonocore, J. Yates, and R. Valentini, “A proposal for a forest digital twin framework and its perspectives,” Forests, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 498, 2022

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    Digital twins in agriculture and forestry: A review,

    A. C. Tagarakis, L. Benos, G. Kyriakarakos, S. Pearson, C. G. Sørensen, and D. Bochtis, “Digital twins in agriculture and forestry: A review,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 10, p. 3117, 2024

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Impactful digital twin in the healthcare revolution,

    H. Hassani, X. Huang, and S. MacFeely, “Impactful digital twin in the healthcare revolution,”Big Data and Cognitive Computing, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 83, 2022

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    Digital twin in healthcare: Recent updates and challenges,

    T. Sun, X. He, and Z. Li, “Digital twin in healthcare: Recent updates and challenges,” Digital Health , vol. 9, p. 20552076221149651, 2023

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    A novel cloud-based framework for the elderly healthcare services using digital twin,

    Y . Liu, L. Zhang, Y . Yang, L. Zhou, L. Ren, F. Wang, R. Liu, Z. Pang, and M. J. Deen, “A novel cloud-based framework for the elderly healthcare services using digital twin,” IEEE access , vol. 7, pp. 49 088–49 101, 2019

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    Technologies for dig- ital twin applications in construction,

    V . V . Tuhaise, J. H. M. Tah, and F. H. Abanda, “Technologies for dig- ital twin applications in construction,” Automation in Construction , vol. 152, p. 104931, 2023

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Digital twin application in the construction industry: A literature review,

    D.-G. J. Opoku, S. Perera, R. Osei-Kyei, and M. Rashidi, “Digital twin application in the construction industry: A literature review,” Journal of Building Engineering , vol. 40, p. 102726, 2021

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    A digital twin for smart farming,

    R. G. Alves, G. Souza, R. F. Maia, A. L. H. Tran, C. Kamienski, J.-P. Soininen, P. T. Aquino, and F. Lima, “A digital twin for smart farming,” in2019 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC). IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–4

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    Digital twins in smart farming,

    C. Verdouw, B. Tekinerdogan, A. Beulens, and S. Wolfert, “Digital twins in smart farming,” Agricultural Systems, vol. 189, p. 103046, 2021

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    Introducing digital twins to agriculture,

    C. Pylianidis, S. Osinga, and I. N. Athanasiadis, “Introducing digital twins to agriculture,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture , vol. 184, p. 105942, 2021

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Toward the next generation of digitalization in agriculture based on digital twin paradigm,

    A. Nasirahmadi and O. Hensel, “Toward the next generation of digitalization in agriculture based on digital twin paradigm,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 2, p. 498, 2022

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    Building DoD’s largest-ever Digital Twin of its kind,

    “Building DoD’s largest-ever Digital Twin of its kind,” https://www.boozallen.com/insights/digital-twin/building-dods- largest-ever-digital-twin-of-its-kind .html [Accessed: 2024-03-28]

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    A real-time digital twin for active safety in an aircraft hangar,

    L. Casey, J. Dooley, M. Codd, R. Dahyot, M. Cognetti, T. Mullarkey, P. Redmond, and G. Lacey, “A real-time digital twin for active safety in an aircraft hangar,” Frontiers in Virtual Reality, vol. 5, p. 1372923, Apr. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frvir.2024.1372923/full

    work page doi:10.3389/frvir.2024.1372923/full 2024

  46. [46]

    Digital Twin- Enabled Online Battlefield Learning with Random Finite Sets,

    P. Wang, M. Yang, J. Zhu, Y . Peng, and G. Li, “Digital Twin- Enabled Online Battlefield Learning with Random Finite Sets,” Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience , vol. 2021, pp. 1–15, May 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www .hindawi.com/journals/ cin/2021/5582241/

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    Robotic mapping: A survey,

    S. Thrun, “Robotic mapping: A survey,” in Exploring Artificial Intelligence in the New Millenium , G. Lakemeyer and B. Nebel, Eds. Morgan Kaufmann, 2002, to appear

    work page 2002

  48. [48]

    Using occupancy grids for mobile robot perception and navigation,

    A. Elfes, “Using occupancy grids for mobile robot perception and navigation,” Computer, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 46–57, 1989

    work page 1989

  49. [49]

    Semantic mapping for mobile robotics tasks: A survey,

    I. Kostavelis and A. Gasteratos, “Semantic mapping for mobile robotics tasks: A survey,”Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 66, pp. 86–103, 2015

    work page 2015

  50. [50]

    A comparative survey of lidar-slam and lidar based sensor technologies,

    M. U. Khan, S. A. A. Zaidi, A. Ishtiaq, S. U. R. Bukhari, S. Samer, and A. Farman, “A comparative survey of lidar-slam and lidar based sensor technologies,” in 2021 Mohammad Ali Jinnah University International Conference on Computing (MAJICC) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–8

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Visual slam: What are the current trends and what to expect?

    A. Tourani, H. Bavle, J. L. Sanchez-Lopez, and H. V oos, “Visual slam: What are the current trends and what to expect?” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 23, p. 9297, 2022

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    From slam to situational awareness: Challenges and survey,

    H. Bavle, J. L. Sanchez-Lopez, C. Cimarelli, A. Tourani, and H. V oos, “From slam to situational awareness: Challenges and survey,” Sen- sors, vol. 23, no. 10, p. 4849, 2023

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    Planar fiducial markers: a comparative study,

    D. Jurado-Rodriguez, R. Mu ˜noz-Salinas, S. Garrido-Jurado, and R. Medina-Carnicer, “Planar fiducial markers: a comparative study,” Virtual Reality, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1733–1749, 2023

    work page 2023

  54. [54]

    Fiducial markers for pose estimation: Overview, applications and experimental comparison of the artag, apriltag, aruco and stag markers,

    M. Kalaitzakis, B. Cain, S. Carroll, A. Ambrosi, C. Whitehead, and N. Vitzilaios, “Fiducial markers for pose estimation: Overview, applications and experimental comparison of the artag, apriltag, aruco and stag markers,”Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, vol. 101, pp. 1–26, 2021

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    Unclonable human-invisible machine vision markers leveraging the omnidirectional chiral bragg diffraction of cholesteric spherical reflectors,

    H. Agha, Y . Geng, X. Ma, D. I. Avs ¸ar, R. Kizhakidathazhath, Y .-S. Zhang, A. Tourani, H. Bavle, J.-L. Sanchez-Lopez, H. V oos, et al. , “Unclonable human-invisible machine vision markers leveraging the omnidirectional chiral bragg diffraction of cholesteric spherical reflectors,” Light: Science & Applications , vol. 11, no. 1, p. 309, 2022

    work page 2022

  56. [56]

    Cholesteric liquid crystal shells as enabling material for information-rich design and architecture,

    M. Schwartz, G. Lenzini, Y . Geng, P. B. Rønne, P. Y . Ryan, and J. P. Lagerwall, “Cholesteric liquid crystal shells as enabling material for information-rich design and architecture,” Advanced materials , vol. 30, no. 30, p. 1707382, 2018

    work page 2018

  57. [57]

    Linking physical objects to their digital twins via fiducial markers designed for invisibility to humans,

    M. Schwartz, Y . Geng, H. Agha, R. Kizhakidathazhath, D. Liu, G. Lenzini, and J. P. Lagerwall, “Linking physical objects to their digital twins via fiducial markers designed for invisibility to humans,” Multifunctional Materials, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 022002, 2021

    work page 2021

  58. [58]

    This is how the Digital Twin works at the port of Bremen,

    “This is how the Digital Twin works at the port of Bremen,” July 2021, https://www .ohb.de/en/magazine/how-the-digital-twin-works- at-the-port-of-bremen [Accessed: 2024-03-29]

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    A digital twin of Earth for the green transition,

    P. Bauer, B. Stevens, and W. Hazeleger, “A digital twin of Earth for the green transition,” Nature Climate Change , vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 80–83, Feb. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-021-00986-y

    work page 2021

  60. [60]

    Towards a Digital Twin of the Earth System: Geo-Soft-CoRe, a Geoscientific Software & Code Repository,

    I. DeFelipe, J. Alcalde, E. Baykiev, I. Bernal, K. Boonma, R. Carbonell, S. Flude, A. Folch, J. Fullea, D. Garc ´ıa-Castellanos, A. Geyer, S. Giralt, A. Hern ´andez, I. Jim ´enez-Munt, A. Kumar, M.-G. Llorens, J. Mart ´ı, C. Molina, A. Olivar-Casta ˜no, A. Parnell, M. Schimmel, M. Torn ´e, and S. Ventosa, “Towards a Digital Twin of the Earth System: Geo-S...

    work page doi:10.3389/feart.2022.828005/full 2022

  61. [61]

    Digital Twins of the Earth,

    S. Nativi and M. Craglia, “Digital Twins of the Earth,” in Encyclopedia of Mathematical Geosciences , B. Daya Sagar, Q. Cheng, J. McKinley, and F. Agterberg, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 1–4, series Title: Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series. [Online]. Available: https://link .springer.com/ 10.1007/978-3-030-26050-7 457-1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-26050-7 2021

  62. [62]

    Digital Twin-Enabled Decision Support in Mission Engineering and Route Planning,

    E. B. K. Lee, D. L. Van Bossuyt, and J. F. Bickford, “Digital Twin-Enabled Decision Support in Mission Engineering and Route Planning,” Systems, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 82, Nov. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/9/4/82

    work page 2021

  63. [63]

    UA Vradio: Radio link path loss estimation for UA Vs,

    D. Al ´aez, M. Celaya-Echarri, L. Azpilicueta, and J. Villadangos, “UA Vradio: Radio link path loss estimation for UA Vs,” SoftwareX, vol. 25, p. 101628, Feb. 2024. [Online]. Available: https: //linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352711023003242

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    Mastering air combat game with deep reinforcement learning,

    J. Zhu, M. Kuang, W. Zhou, H. Shi, J. Zhu, and X. Han, “Mastering air combat game with deep reinforcement learning,” Defence Technology, vol. 34, pp. 295–312, Apr. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214914723002349

    work page 2024

  65. [65]

    AI-based UA V navigation framework with digital twin technology for mobile target visitation,

    A. Soliman, A. Al-Ali, A. Mohamed, H. Gedawy, D. Izham, M. Bahri, A. Erbad, and M. Guizani, “AI-based UA V navigation framework with digital twin technology for mobile target visitation,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence , vol. 123, p. 106318, Aug. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S095219762300502X

    work page 2023

  66. [66]

    Design and use paradigms for gazebo, an open-source multi-robot simulator,

    N. Koenig and A. Howard, “Design and use paradigms for gazebo, an open-source multi-robot simulator,” in 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566), vol. 3. Sendai, Japan: IEEE, 2004, pp. 2149–2154. [Online]. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1389727/

    work page arXiv 2004

  67. [67]

    Quigley, K

    M. Quigley, K. Conley, B. Gerkey, J. Faust, T. Foote, J. Leibs, R. Wheeler, and A. Ng, ROS: an open-source Robot Operating System. Proc. of the IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) Workshop on Open Source Robotics, Jan. 2009, vol. 3, journal Abbreviation: ICRA Workshop on Open Source Software Publication Title: ICRA Workshop on Open Source Software

    work page 2009

  68. [68]

    “Unity,” 2023, https://unity .com/ [Accessed: 2024-06-20]

    work page 2023

  69. [69]

    Data-driven digital twin technology for optimized control in process systems,

    R. He, G. Chen, C. Dong, S. Sun, and X. Shen, “Data-driven digital twin technology for optimized control in process systems,” ISA transactions, vol. 95, pp. 221–234, 2019

    work page 2019

  70. [70]

    Robust additive manufacturing performance through a control oriented digital twin,

    P. Stavropoulos, A. Papacharalampopoulos, C. K. Michail, and G. Chryssolouris, “Robust additive manufacturing performance through a control oriented digital twin,” Metals, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 708, 2021

    work page 2021

  71. [71]

    A digital twin based industrial automation and control system security architecture,

    C. Gehrmann and M. Gunnarsson, “A digital twin based industrial automation and control system security architecture,” IEEE Transac- tions on Industrial Informatics , vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 669–680, 2019

    work page 2019

  72. [72]

    Control Strategies for Digital Twin Systems,

    G.-P. Liu, “Control Strategies for Digital Twin Systems,” IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 170–180, Jan. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10399361/

    work page arXiv 2024

  73. [73]

    FCX series - A class apart,

    “FCX series - A class apart,” 2023, https://www .fincantieri.com/ globalassets/prodotti-servizi/navi-militari/fincantieri broch-m-22- 22-fcx-series-lr .pdf [Accessed: 2024-03-28]

    work page 2023

  74. [74]

    Delivering Digitally for F-35 Force Management Solutions,

    “Delivering Digitally for F-35 Force Management Solutions,” Feb. 2021, https://www .f35.com/f35/news-and-features/delivering- digitally-for-f35-force-management-solution .html [Accessed: 2024- 03-28]

    work page 2021

  75. [75]

    A physical-virtual based digital twin robotic hand,

    O. Singh and A. K. Ray, “A physical-virtual based digital twin robotic hand,” International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) , Mar. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12008-024-01773-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s12008-024-01773-7 2024

  76. [76]

    Towards a Digital Twin for Underwater Systems Based on Meta-Learning

    M. R. Mod ´eer, “Towards a Digital Twin for Underwater Systems Based on Meta-Learning.” NATO, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www .sto.nato.int/publications/STO%20Meeting% 20Proceedings/STO-MP-A VT-369/MP-A VT-369-26P.pdf

    work page 2023

  77. [77]

    Physical, Technical, Tactical, Mental – The Next Step,

    “Physical, Technical, Tactical, Mental – The Next Step,” May 2007, https://www.badmintoncentral.com/forums/index.php?threads/ physical-technical-tactical-mental-%E2%80%93-the-next- step.44065/ [Accessed: 2024-07-05]

    work page 2007

  78. [78]

    Why the technical, tactical, physical and psychological sides of football are deeply intertwined,

    R. Desmond, “Why the technical, tactical, physical and psychological sides of football are deeply intertwined,” July 2022. [Online]. Available: https://themastermindsite .com/2022/07/02/why- the-technical-tactical-physical-and-psychological-sides-of-football- are-deeply-intertwined/

    work page 2022

  79. [79]

    Human digital twin for personalized healthcare: Vision, architecture and future directions,

    S. D. Okegbile, J. Cai, D. Niyato, and C. Yi, “Human digital twin for personalized healthcare: Vision, architecture and future directions,” IEEE network, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 262–269, 2022

    work page 2022

  80. [80]

    Human digital twin: A survey,

    Y . Lin, L. Chen, A. Ali, C. Nugent, I. Cleland, R. Li, J. Ding, and H. Ning, “Human digital twin: A survey,” Journal of Cloud Computing, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 131, 2024

    work page 2024

Showing first 80 references.