pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.05897 · v4 · pith:WWTFR6A7new · submitted 2025-08-07 · 🌀 gr-qc · quant-ph

A spacetime-covariant approach to inertial and accelerated quantum clocks in first-quantization

Eduardo A. B. Oliveira , Andre G. S. Landulfo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 23:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc quant-ph
keywords quantum clocksproper timespacetime covariancetime dilationHamiltonian decompositionfirst quantizationcoherent statesquantum fluctuations
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:WWTFR6A7 Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number? 
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{WWTFR6A7}

Prints a linked pith:WWTFR6A7 badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

The pith

A decomposition of the clock Hamiltonian into positive- and negative-mass sectors allows the evolution of quantum clocks to be computed directly in terms of proper time while preserving explicit spacetime covariance and unitarity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a spacetime-covariant formalism for describing quantum clocks in first quantization, including those accelerated by external fields. It establishes that when the quadratic clock Hamiltonian can be decomposed into positive- and negative-mass sectors, the system's time evolution can be calculated using the clock's proper time. This keeps the description covariant and ensures unitarity even with couplings to external fields. For clocks prepared in coherent states, the conditional probabilities for time measurements match classical time dilation while exhibiting quantum fluctuations that are either Gaussian or periodically modulated.

Core claim

When a particular decomposition of the (quadratic) clock Hamiltonian into positive- and negative-mass sectors is attainable, the evolution of the system can be computed directly in terms of the clock's proper time while maintaining explicit covariance. The evolution is always unitary even with external-field couplings. For coherent-state preparations the density matrix yields conditional probabilities whose peaks match classical time dilation together with Gaussian or periodically modulated quantum fluctuations.

What carries the argument

The decomposition of the quadratic clock Hamiltonian into positive- and negative-mass sectors, which permits direct computation of evolution in proper time with covariance and unitarity.

If this is right

  • The joint time evolution of inertial clocks with relative motion can be calculated in proper time.
  • Charged clocks accelerated by a uniform magnetic field exhibit unitary evolution in proper time.
  • Conditional probabilities from the density matrix for coherent states peak at classical time dilation values.
  • Quantum fluctuations around the classical peak are either pure Gaussian or Gaussian with periodic modulation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This formalism may extend to modeling effects in quantum gravity at accessible scales through coherent superpositions of clock states.
  • Similar decompositions could be explored for other types of external fields or more general spacetimes.
  • Laboratory tests with charged quantum systems in magnetic fields might reveal the predicted quantum fluctuations in time measurements.

Load-bearing premise

The quadratic clock Hamiltonian admits a decomposition into positive- and negative-mass sectors for the inertial and accelerated cases considered.

What would settle it

Finding an inertial or accelerated clock system where the required Hamiltonian decomposition cannot be performed or where the resulting evolution violates unitarity would falsify the approach.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.05897 by Andre G. S. Landulfo, Eduardo A. B. Oliveira.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: ). Thus, the choice of which energy sectors ap￾pear in our physical states translates into a choice of ini￾tial condition. If, for instance, we are only interested in positive-energy solutions, we must pick a ψ0 which is nonvanishing in the p 0 > 0 portion of the support. Hav￾ing chosen and initial condition, we can then evolve the initial state in Eq. (64) with the Hamiltonian HS yield￾ing |ψ(τ )⟩S = e −i… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Classical time-dilation between clocks with relative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Classical worldlines of two charged particles in a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

It is expected that a quantum theory of gravity will radically alter our current notion of spacetime geometry. However, contrary to what was commonly assumed for many decades, quantum gravity effects could manifest in scales much larger than the Planck scale, provided that there is enough coherence in the superposition of geometries. Quantum clocks, i.e. quantum mechanical systems whose internal dynamics can keep track of proper time lapses, are a very promising tool for probing such low-energy quantum gravity effects. In this work, we contribute to this subject by proposing a spacetime-covariant formalism to describe clocks in first quantization. In particular, we account for the possibility of dynamically accelerated clocks via suitable couplings with external fields. We find that a particular decomposition of the (quadratic) clock Hamiltonian into positive- and negative-mass sectors, when attainable, enables one to compute the evolution of the system directly in terms of the clock's proper time while maintaining explicit covariance. When this decomposition is possible, the evolution obtained is always unitary, even with couplings with external fields used to, e.g., accelerate the clocks. We then apply this formulation to compute the joint time evolution of a pair of quantum clocks in two cases: (i) inertial clocks with relative motion and (ii) charged clocks accelerated by a uniform magnetic field. In both cases, when our clocks are prepared in coherent states, we find that the density matrix $\rho_{\tau_2|\tau_1}$ describing time-measurements of the two clocks yields not only conditional probabilities whose peaks match exactly the classical expected values for time dilation, but also yields coherent quantum fluctuations around that peak, with a profile which is either (i) a pure Gaussian or (ii) a Gaussian combined with a periodic modulation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a spacetime-covariant formalism for first-quantized quantum clocks that incorporates dynamical acceleration through external-field couplings. The central technical step is a decomposition of the quadratic clock Hamiltonian into positive- and negative-mass sectors; when attainable, this decomposition permits the system's evolution to be written directly in terms of the clock's proper time while preserving explicit covariance. The resulting evolution is claimed to remain unitary even in the presence of external couplings. The formalism is applied to two concrete cases: (i) a pair of inertial clocks with relative motion and (ii) charged clocks accelerated by a uniform magnetic field. For coherent-state preparations the conditional density matrix yields probabilities whose peaks reproduce classical time dilation together with Gaussian or Gaussian-plus-periodic quantum fluctuations.

Significance. If the decomposition is shown to be attainable in a manifestly covariant manner for the accelerated case, the work supplies a concrete calculational framework for relativistic quantum clocks that could be used to probe low-energy quantum-gravity effects through coherence in geometry superpositions. The explicit fluctuation profiles around classical dilation constitute falsifiable predictions for both inertial and accelerated regimes.

major comments (1)
  1. [Formalism and accelerated-clocks application] The attainability of the positive/negative-mass decomposition of the quadratic Hamiltonian for charged clocks in a uniform magnetic field is assumed rather than demonstrated (see the paragraph describing the formalism and the subsequent application to accelerated clocks). The external vector potential couples to the four-velocity, and it is not shown that a unique, frame-independent decomposition exists that preserves spacetime covariance. Because the claims of direct proper-time evolution, guaranteed unitarity, and the specific form of the conditional probabilities and fluctuations all rest on this step, an explicit construction or proof of attainability for the magnetic case is required.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the fluctuations are 'either (i) a pure Gaussian or (ii) a Gaussian combined with a periodic modulation' but does not indicate which profile corresponds to the inertial case and which to the magnetic-acceleration case; a brief clarification in the main text would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive feedback. We appreciate the positive assessment of the potential significance of the covariant clock formalism. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Formalism and accelerated-clocks application] The attainability of the positive/negative-mass decomposition of the quadratic Hamiltonian for charged clocks in a uniform magnetic field is assumed rather than demonstrated (see the paragraph describing the formalism and the subsequent application to accelerated clocks). The external vector potential couples to the four-velocity, and it is not shown that a unique, frame-independent decomposition exists that preserves spacetime covariance. Because the claims of direct proper-time evolution, guaranteed unitarity, and the specific form of the conditional probabilities and fluctuations all rest on this step, an explicit construction or proof of attainability for the magnetic case is required.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript states the decomposition is used 'when attainable' and applies it to the magnetic case without an explicit construction. This is a fair observation. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph (or short subsection) that explicitly constructs the positive/negative-mass decomposition for a charged clock in a uniform magnetic field. The construction proceeds by (i) selecting a covariant gauge for the vector potential that is compatible with the uniform field, (ii) performing the decomposition with respect to the instantaneous co-moving frame defined by the four-velocity, and (iii) verifying that the resulting projectors are Lorentz scalars and therefore frame-independent. Because the magnetic field is constant, the Lorentz-force term remains linear in the four-velocity, allowing the quadratic Hamiltonian to be split covariantly while preserving the overall spacetime covariance of the evolution operator. We will also confirm that this decomposition yields the reported unitary proper-time evolution and the Gaussian-plus-periodic fluctuation profile. This addition directly addresses the referee's concern and strengthens the applicability of the formalism to accelerated clocks. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results explicitly conditional on stated assumption

full rationale

The paper conditions its key claims (proper-time evolution, maintained covariance, unitarity with external fields, and conditional probabilities matching classical dilation plus fluctuations) on the explicit assumption that a decomposition of the quadratic clock Hamiltonian into positive- and negative-mass sectors is attainable. This assumption is stated as a prerequisite rather than derived or fitted within the work, and the subsequent steps apply standard first-quantized relativistic quantum mechanics under that condition for both inertial and magnetically accelerated cases. No derivation reduces by construction to its own inputs, no predictions are statistically forced from subsets of data, and no load-bearing uniqueness or ansatz is imported via self-citation chains. The approach is self-contained against external benchmarks of relativistic QM.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the attainability of the positive/negative-mass decomposition of the quadratic Hamiltonian and on standard background assumptions of relativistic quantum mechanics and spacetime covariance. No free parameters, new entities, or ad-hoc axioms are identifiable from the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard first-quantized relativistic quantum mechanics applies to the clock systems
    The paper works entirely within a first-quantization framework for clocks.
  • domain assumption Spacetime covariance must be preserved under the chosen decomposition
    The formalism is required to remain explicitly covariant.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5851 in / 1397 out tokens · 34043 ms · 2026-05-18T23:32:43.409832+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    worldfunction

    but with several fundamental differences. Differently from [29], we do not introduce global gauge constraints to produce a perspective-neutral structure5 and we intro- duce the clocks’ internal Hamiltonian covariantly, such that the internal energy associated to it appears in the clocks’ dispersion relation. Differently from [35], we con- sider time evolu...

    work page

  2. [2]

    (100) peak around the classical value of time dilation τ2 = τ1/γ with respect to the foliation Σ t orthogonal to the 4-velocity of clock 1 (see Fig

    + ∆′ 2(τ ′′ 2 ) , (102) ˜∆2 ≡ ∆2 + (γv∆0)2, (103) ξ2 ≡ ∆2 0 (1 + γ2)∆2 + γ2v2∆2 0 = ∆2 0 ˜∆2 + γ2∆2 .(104) We note that the conditional probabilities P (τ2|τ1) arising from the diagonal terms ofρτ2|τ1 in Eq. (100) peak around the classical value of time dilation τ2 = τ1/γ with respect to the foliation Σ t orthogonal to the 4-velocity of clock 1 (see Fig. ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    and ∆′′ 2 ≡ ∆′ 0(τ ′′ 2 ), as well as an average spread ˜∆0 = 2∆1 + ∆′ 2 + ∆′′ 2, and we have approximated ∆ ′ 2 ≃ ∆′′ 2 ≡ ∆2. Once again, we find that the conditional probabilities given by the diagonal values of ρτ2|τ1 (τ ′ 2 = τ ′′ 2 ) peak ex- actly at the classical time- dilation values ¯ γ2τ2 = ¯γ1τ1, Fig. 4). As in the previous examples, ρτ2|τ1 exh...

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Belenchia, R

    A. Belenchia, R. Wald, F. Giacomini, E. Castro-Ruiz, C. Brukner, and M. Aspelmeyer, Quantum superposition of massive objects and the quantization of gravity, Physical Review D 98, 126009 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Belenchia, R

    A. Belenchia, R. Wald, F. Giacomini, E. Castro-Ruiz, C. Brukner, and M. Aspelmeyer, Information content of the gravitational field of a quantum superposition, Interna- tional Journal of Modern Physics D, 28, 1943001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    R. M. Wald, Quantum superposition of massive bod- ies, International Journal of Modern Physics D, 29(11), 2041003. (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Bengyat, A

    O. Bengyat, A. di Biagio, M. Aspelmeyer, and M. Christodoulou, Gravity-mediated entanglement between oscillators as quantum superposition of geometries, Phys- ical Review D, 110 056046 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Christodoulou, A

    M. Christodoulou, A. Di Biagio, M. Aspelmeyer, ˇC. Brukner, C. Rovelli, and R. Howl, Locally mediated en- tanglement in linearized quantum gravity, Physical Re- view Letters 130, 100202 (2023)

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Oppenheim, A Postquantum Theory of Classical Grav- ity?, Physical Review X 13, 041040 (2023)

    J. Oppenheim, A Postquantum Theory of Classical Grav- ity?, Physical Review X 13, 041040 (2023)

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    Marletto and V

    C. Marletto and V. Vedral, Gravitationally Induced En- tanglement between Two Massive Particles is Sufficient Evidence of Quantum Effects in Gravity, Physical Review Letters 119, 240402 (2017)

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Bose et al

    S. Bose et al . Spin Entanglement Witness for Quantum Gravity, Physical Review Letters 119, 240401 (2017)

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Aspelmeyer, How to avoid the appearance of a classical world in gravity experiments arXiv:2203.05587 [quant-ph]

    M. Aspelmeyer, How to avoid the appearance of a classical world in gravity experiments arXiv:2203.05587 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv

  13. [13]

    Aspelmeyer (September 23-27, 2024), Quantum Sources of Gravity: ’why?’ and ’how?’

    M. Aspelmeyer (September 23-27, 2024), Quantum Sources of Gravity: ’why?’ and ’how?’... but mostly ’how?’. [presentation of the state-of-the-art of pre- cision tabletop gravity experiments and their fu- ture prospects for testing quantum aspects gravity] Witnessing Quantum Aspects of Gravity in a Lab, S˜ ao Paulo, SP, Brazil. https://www.ictp-saifr.org/ w...

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    de la Hamette, V

    A. de la Hamette, V. Kabel, E. Castro-Ruiz, and ˇC. Brukner, Falling through masses in superposition: quan- tum reference frames for indefinite metrics, Communica- tions Physics 6, 231 (2023), arXiv:2112.11473 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    M. Zych, F. Costa, I. Pikovski, and ˇC. Brukner. Bell’s theorem for temporal order. Nature Communications 10, 3772 (2019)

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    Christodoulou, A

    M. Christodoulou, A. Di Biagio, R. Howl, and C. Rov- elli. Gravity entanglement, quantum reference systems, 19 degrees of freedom, Classical and Quantum Gravity 40 047001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    L. Chen, F. Giacomini, and C. Rovelli, Quantum States of Fields for Quantum Split Sources, Quantum 7, 958 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    Kabel, A.-C

    V. Kabel, A.-C. de la Hamette, L. Apadula, C. Cepol- laro, H. Gomes, J. Butterfield, and ˇC. Brukner, Iden- tification is Pointless: Quantum Reference Frames, Lo- calisation of Events, and the Quantum Hole Argument, (arXiv:2402.10267) [quant-ph] (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    T. R. Perche and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, Geometry of spacetime from quantum measurements, Physical Review D, 105(6), 066011 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    arXiv:2405.15455 [quant-ph]

    J. G lowacki, Towards Relational Quantum Field Theory, (arXiv:2405.15455) [quant-phys] (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Foo, R.B

    J. Foo, R.B. Mann, and M. Zych, Schr¨ odinger’s cat for de Sitter spacetime, Class. Quantum Grav. 38 115010 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Foo et al , Quantum Signatures of Black Hole Mass Superpositions Phys

    J. Foo et al , Quantum Signatures of Black Hole Mass Superpositions Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 181301 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Foo et al, Quantum superpositions of Minkowski space- time, Phys

    J. Foo et al, Quantum superpositions of Minkowski space- time, Phys. Rev. D 107, 045014 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Geroch, General Relativity: 1972 Lecture Notes (Minkowski Institute Press, Montreal, 2013)

    R. Geroch, General Relativity: 1972 Lecture Notes (Minkowski Institute Press, Montreal, 2013)

    work page 1972

  25. [25]

    De Felice and D

    F. De Felice and D. Bini, Classical Measurements in Curved Space-Times (Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 2010)

    work page 2010

  26. [26]

    R. M. Wald, General relativity (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984)

    work page 1984

  27. [27]

    Pikovski, M

    I. Pikovski, M. Zych, F. Costa, and ˇC. Brukner, Universal decoherence due to gravitational time dilation, Nature Physics 11, 668–672 (2015)

    work page 2015

  28. [28]

    Pikovski, M

    I. Pikovski, M. Zych, F. Costa, and ˇC. Brukner, Time di- lation in quantum systems and decoherence, New Journal of Physics 19, 025011 (2017)

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    Gooding and W.G

    C. Gooding and W.G. Unruh, Bootstrapping Time Dila- tion Decoherence, Foundations of Physics 45, 1166–1178 (2015)

    work page 2015

  30. [30]

    D. N. Page and W. K. Wootters, Evolution without evo- lution: Dynamics described by stationary observables. Physical Review D 27, 2885 (1983)

    work page 1983

  31. [31]

    Giovannetti, S

    V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum Time, Physical Review D 92, 045033 (2015)

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    Giacomini, Spacetime Quantum Reference Frames and superpositions of proper times

    F. Giacomini, Spacetime Quantum Reference Frames and superpositions of proper times. Quantum, 5, 508 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    DeWitt, Quantum Theory of Gravity

    B. DeWitt, Quantum Theory of Gravity. I. The Canoni- cal Theory, Physical Review 160 (1967)

    work page 1967

  34. [34]

    Vanrietvelde, P

    A. Vanrietvelde, P. A. H¨ ohn, F. Giacomini, and E. Castro-Ruiz, A change of perspective: switching quan- tum reference frames via a perspective-neutral frame- work, Quantum, 4, 225 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    Vanrietvelde, P

    A. Vanrietvelde, P. A. H¨ ohn, and F. Giacomini, Switch- ing quantum reference frames in the N-body problem and the absence of global relational perspectives, Quantum, 7, 1088 (2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    Giacomini, E

    F. Giacomini, E. Castro-Ruiz, and ˇC. Brukner, Quantum mechanics and the covariance of physical laws in quan- tum reference frames, Nature Communications 10, 494 (2019)

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    Castro-Ruiz, F.Giacomini, A

    E. Castro-Ruiz, F.Giacomini, A. Belenchia, and ˇC. Brukner, Quantum clocks and the temporal localisability of events in the presence of gravitating quantum systems, Nature Communications 11, 2672 (2020)

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    A. R. H. Smith and M. Ahmadi, Quantum clocks observe classical and quantum time dilation. Nature Communi- cations, 11, 5360 (2020)

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    P. A. H¨ ohn, A. R. H. Smith, and M. P. E. Lock, Trinity of relational quantum dynamics. Physical Review D, 104, 066001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    P. A. H¨ ohn, A. R. H. Smith, and M. P. E. Lock, Equiv- alence of Approaches to Relational Quantum Dynamics in Relativistic Settings. Frontiers in Physics, 9 (2021)

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    I. L. Paiva, A. Te’eni, B. Y. Peled, E. Cohen, and Y. Aharonov, Non-inertial quantum clock frames lead to non-Hermitian dynamics, Communications Physics 5, 298 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    E. P. G. Gale and M. Zych, Relativistic Unruh-DeWitt detectors with quantized center of mass, Physical Review D, 107(5), 056023. (2023)

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Giacomini and A

    F. Giacomini and A. Kempf, Second-quantized Unruh- DeWitt detectors and their quantum reference frame transformations. Physical Review D, 105(12), 125001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    C. J. Fewster, D. W. Janssen, L. D. Loveridge, K. Rejzner, and J. Waldron, Quantum reference frames, measurement schemes and the type of local algebras in quantum field theory, Communications in Mathematical Physics 406, 19 (2025), arXiv:2403.11973 [math-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Rovelli, Why Gauge?, Foundations of Physics, 44, 91–104 (2014)

    C. Rovelli, Why Gauge?, Foundations of Physics, 44, 91–104 (2014)

    work page 2014

  46. [46]

    A. R. H. Smith and M. Ahmadi, Quantizing time: Inter- acting clocks and systems. Quantum, 3, 160 (2019)

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    Diaz and R

    N.L. Diaz and R. Rossignoli, History state formalism for Dirac’s theory, Phys. Rev. D 99, 045008 (2019)

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    Diaz, J.M

    N.L. Diaz, J.M. Matera, and R. Rossignoli, History state formalism for scalar particles, Phys. Rev. D 100, 125020 (2019)

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    Pauli, Die allgemeinen Prinzipien der Wellen- mechanik (Springer Nature, Berlin, 1990)

    W. Pauli, Die allgemeinen Prinzipien der Wellen- mechanik (Springer Nature, Berlin, 1990). (Original work published in 1958)

    work page 1990

  50. [50]

    Oreshkov, Time-delocalized quantum subsystems and operations: on the existence of processes with indefinite causal structure in quantum mechanics, Quantum 3, 206 (2019)

    O. Oreshkov, Time-delocalized quantum subsystems and operations: on the existence of processes with indefinite causal structure in quantum mechanics, Quantum 3, 206 (2019)

    work page 2019

  51. [51]

    Paunkovi ´c and M

    N. Paunkovi ´c and M. Vojinovi ´c, Causal orders, quan- tum circuits and spacetime: distinguishing between def- inite and superposed causal orders, Quantum 4, 275 (2020)

    work page 2020

  52. [52]

    Saletan and A

    E. Saletan and A. Cromer, A Variational Principle for Nonholonomic Systems, American Journal of Physics 38, 892 (1970)

    work page 1970

  53. [53]

    Marnelius, Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulation of relativistic particle mechanics, Physical Review D, 10(8), 2535–2553 (1974)

    R. Marnelius, Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulation of relativistic particle mechanics, Physical Review D, 10(8), 2535–2553 (1974)

    work page 1974

  54. [54]

    Rovelli, Quantum mechanics without time: A model, Physical Review D, 42(8), 2638–2646 (1990)

    C. Rovelli, Quantum mechanics without time: A model, Physical Review D, 42(8), 2638–2646 (1990)

    work page 1990

  55. [55]

    Reisenberger and C

    M. Reisenberger and C. Rovelli, Spacetime states and covariant quantum theory, Physical Review D, 65(12), 125016 (2002)

    work page 2002

  56. [56]

    Henneaux and Claudio Teitelboim, Quantization of Gauge Systems , (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1992)

    M. Henneaux and Claudio Teitelboim, Quantization of Gauge Systems , (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1992)

    work page 1992

  57. [57]

    J. R. Klauder, Coherent State Quantization of Constraint Systems, Annals of Physics 254, 419 (1997)

    work page 1997

  58. [58]

    J. R. Klauder, Quantization of Constrained Systems. In: Latal, H., Schweiger, W. (eds) Methods of Quantiza- tion (pp. 143-182), Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 572. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2001). 20

    work page 2001

  59. [59]

    S. V. Shabanov, Geometry of the physical phase space in quantum gauge systems, Physics Reports 326, pp.1-163, (2000)

    work page 2000

  60. [60]

    Prokhorov, and S.V

    L.V. Prokhorov, and S.V. Shabanov, Quantization of constrained systems . In: Hamiltonian Mechanics of Gauge Systems (pp. 171-191), Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press (2011). 21

    work page 2011