Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Boundary conditions decide which zero-mode class survives the continuum limit in 2D SU(2) gauge theory.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

For 2D SU(2) gauge theory with one massless Majorana fermion, only one of the two overlap zero-mode classes survives the continuum limit depending on boundary conditions, and a zero-mode-excluding 'topological condensate' is nonzero without spontaneous symmetry breaking.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection The abstract promises a clean result—boundary conditions pick one mod-2 index class and a zero-mode-excluded condensate stays nonzero—but the supplied text is unreadable, so the verdict rides on numerics the abstract doesn't show. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2508.05967 v3 pith:OFL5X4I2 submitted 2025-08-08 hep-lat hep-th

Lattice study of two-dimensional SU(2) gauge theories with a single massless Majorana fermion

Rajamani Narayanan , Ray Romero This is my paper
classification hep-lat hep-th MSC 81T2581T13 PACS 11.15.Ha
keywords lattice gauge theoryMajorana fermionoverlap fermionmod(2) indextopological condensatezero modesSU(2)continuum limit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks what the continuum limit of a two-dimensional SU(2) gauge theory coupled to a single massless Majorana fermion looks like when the fermion is implemented with overlap fermions in a real representation. Because the overlap operator's spectrum is rigid, lattice gauge fields on a periodic torus fall into two classes: those carrying one chirally paired zero mode and those carrying none. Using numerical spectral data for integer representations J=1,2,3,4, the authors argue that only one class survives the continuum limit, selected by the boundary conditions of the fermion and gauge field, and that consequently two of the four possible partition functions vanish. They further show that a topological condensate—a fermion-bilinear expectation value defined as a ratio of modified partition functions with the overlap zero modes removed—is nonzero on finite tori and in the infinite-volume limit, while spectral-density and lowest-eigenvalue scaling reveal no spontaneous symmetry breaking but zero modes appearing only at infinite volume. If these claims hold, boundary conditions are physical parameters of the continuum theory, not lattice artifacts, and a single-partition-function plaquette model should reproduce the same physics.

Core claim

The central discovery is that the mod(2) index of massless overlap fermions divides the lattice gauge fields of two-dimensional SU(2) gauge theory into two rigid classes, and numerical evidence shows that the continuum limit keeps only one class; whether the surviving class is the one with a chirally paired zero mode or the one without is fixed by the boundary conditions on the fermion and the gauge field. As a result, two of the four possible partition functions vanish in the continuum limit. The paper defines modified partition functions from which the overlap zero modes are removed, and uses their ratios to give an expectation value to a fermion bilinear, the topological condensate. This

What carries the argument

The mod(2) index of the massless overlap fermion in the real representation of SU(2): because the spectrum cannot change continuously, each gauge-field background is rigidly labelled by whether it has one chirally paired zero mode. This classification splits the path integral into two classes, and modified partition functions with the zero modes removed turn a ratio into a well-defined fermion-bilinear expectation value, the topological condensate. The numerical analysis uses spectral density and the scaling of the lowest Dirac eigenvalue with torus size to diagnose spontaneous symmetry breaking versus zero modes.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the extrapolation: the finite-lattice spectral density and lowest-eigenvalue scaling are assumed to reveal the true infinite-volume, zero-lattice-spacing behavior; if the scaling is misread, all main conclusions fall.

What would settle it

On a sequence of tori at fixed small lattice spacing, measure the lowest fermion eigenvalue and the ratio of the modified partition functions defining the topological condensate. If the lowest eigenvalue approaches zero at finite volume, or the condensate ratio tends to zero rather than to a positive constant, the paper's central claim is falsified.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Boundary conditions acquire physical status: they select which zero-mode class contributes to the continuum theory, so they are not merely lattice artifacts.
  • Two of the four possible partition functions vanish in the continuum limit, reducing the set of distinct sectors in the theory.
  • The topological condensate is nonzero on every finite physical torus and remains nonzero at infinite volume, even though no spontaneous symmetry breaking occurs.
  • Zero modes of the overlap fermion appear only in the infinite-volume limit, while finite-volume spectra show no sign of symmetry breaking.
  • The results are stable across integer representations J=1,2,3,4, which motivates replacing the four-partition-function structure by a single-partition-function plaquette model.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit whether the four partition functions label genuinely distinct superselection sectors; if they do, mixed boundary conditions might interpolate between them, a testable lattice question.
  • The pairing of a nonzero topological condensate with no spontaneous symmetry breaking points to an infrared or topological origin for the condensate; measuring its limiting value at different torus aspect ratios would test that reading.
  • The proposed single-partition-function plaquette model is a concrete falsifiable extension: its spectral density and lowest-eigenvalue scaling should match the overlap results in the continuum limit for J=1,2,3,4.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies two-dimensional SU(2) lattice gauge theory with a single massless Majorana fermion in integer isospin representation J. It builds on the mod-2 index rigidity of overlap fermions in real representations to classify torus gauge-field configurations into classes with and without chirally paired zero modes. The authors claim numerical evidence that only one of these classes survives the continuum limit, with the surviving class depending on fermion and gauge-field boundary conditions, so that two of the four possible partition functions vanish in the continuum limit. They define a 'topological condensate' from modified partition functions that omit overlap zero modes and report that it is nonzero on finite physical tori and in the infinite-volume limit. They further claim that spectral-density and lowest-eigenvalue scaling studies show no spontaneous symmetry breaking while zero modes emerge only at infinite volume, with the same conclusions for J=1,2,3,4. The abstract also announces an 'independent plaquette model' as a single-partition-function description of the infinite-volume physics.

Significance. If substantiated, the paper would present a surprising combination of results: boundary-condition selection of the continuum limit, two of four partition functions vanishing, and a nonzero topological condensate coexisting with the absence of spontaneous symmetry breaking. The topic is relevant for understanding 2D gauge theories with Majorana fermions and for lattice formulations of real representations. However, the support in the submitted manuscript is essentially qualitative. The abstract reports numerical evidence without any lattice sizes, couplings, statistics, error bars, or scaling-fit details, and the central observable is defined by excluding the very zero modes whose behavior is at issue. No machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or parameter-free derivations are provided. The significance therefore remains conditional on a much more complete presentation of the numerical analysis and a clearer conceptual separation between analytic identities and dynamical extrapolations.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract, topological condensate definition] The central observable is a ratio of 'modified partition functions which do not include the zero modes of the overlap fermions in the fermion determinant.' The paper also states that zero modes are absent on finite tori and emerge only in the infinite-volume limit. If that is true, the modification appears to be vacuous on every finite-volume configuration, and the ratio reduces to an ordinary expectation value. If the modification is not vacuous, the paper must justify physically why removing zero modes is mandated. As written, the claim that the topological condensate is nonzero appears to be a property of the ad hoc definition rather than of the original path integral.
  2. [Abstract, 'two of the four possible partition functions are zero'] The abstract presents the vanishing of two partition functions as a continuum-limit outcome, but the mod-2 index rigidity stated as an input already implies that the fermion Pfaffian vanishes identically on configurations in the zero-mode class. If so, the corresponding partition functions are zero on every finite lattice by an exact identity, not by a continuum-limit selection. The manuscript must separate the analytic vanishing from the dynamical question of which zero-mode class carries nonzero weight in the path integral, and should report finite-volume weights, Pfaffian magnitudes, and signs for all four boundary-condition combinations.
  3. [Abstract, numerical evidence] The central continuum and infinite-volume claims rest on 'numerical evidence' from spectral density and lowest-eigenvalue scaling, but no lattice sizes, gauge couplings, statistics, error bars, or fit forms are given. Without these numbers the extrapolations cannot be checked. In particular, the claim that zero modes emerge only at infinite volume requires a scaling analysis that distinguishes a true zero mode from a near-zero mode that would be removed in the continuum limit; the manuscript does not provide the necessary data to make that distinction.
  4. [Abstract, boundary-condition scan] The statement that 'only one of these classes survives the continuum limit and this depends on the boundary conditions of the fermion and the gauge field' presumes that the four combinations scanned exhaust the relevant boundary-condition choices. The manuscript should justify that the scan is complete and discuss whether other choices, such as discrete theta terms or spin structures, could change the conclusion.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'two of the four possible partition functions' is ambiguous: the four choices should be listed explicitly (e.g., periodic/antiperiodic fermion times periodic/antiperiodic gauge field) so the reader can track which combinations are claimed to vanish.
  2. [Abstract] The 'independent plaquette model' is mentioned but not defined or tested. Either give its definition and supporting evidence, or remove it from the abstract, since it cannot be evaluated as presented.
  3. [Introduction / background] The manuscript does not cite the relevant literature on the mod-2 index of overlap operators in real representations or earlier numerical studies of 2D gauge theories with Majorana fermions. Such references are needed to place the claims in context.
  4. [Notation] The representation label J should be defined explicitly as the spin-J representation of SU(2), and the relation between J and the dimension of the fermion representation should be stated.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

The claim that two of four partition functions vanish reduces to the definition of the zero-mode class plus the Majorana Pfaffian; the numerical evidence can only assign boundary conditions to classes, not establish the vanishing.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Abstract, sentences 1-3]
    "lattice gauge fields on a periodic torus come under two classes; ones that have one set of chirally paired zero modes and ones that do not. we present numerical evidence that shows only one of these classes survives the continuum limit As such, two of the four possible partition functions are zero in the continuum limit."

    The two classes are defined by the presence or absence of chirally paired overlap zero modes. For a single massless Majorana fermion, the fermion path-integral measure is a Pfaffian, and any configuration with an exact zero mode has vanishing Pfaffian. Therefore the unmodified partition function receives zero weight from the entire zero-mode class at every finite lattice spacing and finite volume. The statement that 'only one of these classes survives the continuum limit' and that 'two of the four possible partition functions are zero' follows immediately from the class definition plus the zero-mode structure of the Pfaffian; it is a construction identity, not an outcome of the continuum extrapolation. The numerical work can at most determine which boundary-condition combination selects wh

full rationale

The abstract is the reliably readable part of the supplied text; the body is heavily corrupted in the provided rendering. On the evidence available, the paper is not a self-citation chain: no load-bearing citation to prior work is visible in the abstract, and the spectral-density, lowest-eigenvalue-scaling, and topological-condensate claims have independent numerical content that could in principle fail. However, one central headline conclusion is structurally forced. The paper defines two classes of gauge fields by the presence or absence of chirally paired overlap zero modes. For one massless Majorana fermion, the path-integral weight is the Pfaffian of the overlap operator, and any configuration with an exact zero mode has zero Pfaffian. Hence the entire unmodified partition function over the zero-mode class is zero at every lattice spacing and volume; it cannot 'survive' a continuum limit. The paper's statement that 'two of the four possible partition functions are zero in the continuum limit' is therefore literal by construction: those partition functions are zero already at finite lattice spacing. The numerical content can only determine which boundary conditions select which class and how the surviving class behaves; the vanishing itself is not a numerically discovered continuum phenomenon. The topological condensate, defined through modified partition functions that exclude zero modes, is a zero-mode-subtracted observable; its nonzero value is not reduced by the abstract alone, but the framing of a 'topological condensate' from a ratio that explicitly removes zero modes is at least partially entangled with the same construction. I assign a score of 6 because one of the paper's principal claims reduces by construction, while the remaining numerical results are not shown to be circular on the readable evidence.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 3 axioms · 2 invented entities

The two-class split is imported from the overlap-fermion mod-2 index construction; the continuum and infinite-volume conclusions rest on unstated extrapolation parameters; the vanishing of the zero-mode-class partition functions follows from the fermion measure convention. Nothing in the abstract provides independent evidence for these inputs, but they are standard within the authors' program.

free parameters (2)
  • Lowest-eigenvalue scaling exponent versus torus size
    The claim that zero modes emerge only at infinite volume is derived from the scaling of the lowest eigenvalue with torus size; the fitted exponent and the spectral-density normalization are not stated in the abstract.
  • Infinite-volume and continuum extrapolation ranges (lattice sizes, couplings)
    Conclusions about the continuum limit (one class surviving, two partition functions vanishing, condensate limit) rest on extrapolations whose parameter ranges are not stated in the abstract.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Massless overlap fermions in the real representation have a mod-2 index: the spectrum splits lattice gauge fields into two classes, one with chirally paired zero modes, and this classification is rigid under changes of the background gauge field.
    The abstract opens with this property as the basis of the two-class split; it is imported from prior work on real-representation overlap fermions and not derived here.
  • domain assumption Finite-volume lattice data on a periodic torus faithfully extrapolate to the continuum and infinite-volume limits.
    All headline claims ('survives the continuum limit', nonzero condensate in the infinite-volume limit, zero modes emerging at infinite volume) are justified by finite-lattice numerics; the extrapolation's validity is assumed, not established in the abstract.
  • domain assumption The fermion measure convention: configurations with fermion zero modes contribute zero to the naive partition function (the determinant/Pfaffian vanishes on the zero-mode class).
    The conclusion that two of four partition functions vanish follows from the measure vanishing on zero-mode backgrounds; this is a standard lattice-fermion formalism input that is unstated in the abstract.
invented entities (2)
  • Topological condensate (fermion-bilinear expectation value defined as a ratio of modified partition functions that exclude overlap zero modes) independent evidence
    purpose: Provides a well-defined fermion-bilinear observable when naive partition functions vanish on zero-mode backgrounds; the paper claims it is nonzero on any finite torus and in the infinite-volume limit.
    The claimed nonzero value on finite tori and its infinite-volume limit are in-principle checkable predictions, but the definition is internal to this paper's construction.
  • Independent plaquette model independent evidence
    purpose: A simplified lattice model proposed to reproduce the same infinite-volume physics with a single partition function, avoiding the two-class zero-mode complication.
    Its predictions (reproducing the correct infinite-volume physics) are falsifiable by independent simulation, but no details are given in the abstract.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Lattice study of two-dimensional SU(2) gauge theories with a single massless Majorana fermion." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OFL5X4I2

@misc{pith2026250805967,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Lattice study of two-dimensional SU(2) gauge theories with a single massless Majorana fermion},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OFL5X4I2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.05967}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Massless overlap fermions in the real representation of two dimensional $SU(N_c)$ gauge theories exhibit a mod($2$) index due to the rigidity of its spectrum when viewed as a function of the background gauge field - lattice gauge fields on a periodic torus come under two classes; ones that have one set of chirally paired zero modes and ones that do not. Focusing on $SU(2)$ and a single Majorana fermion in an integer representation, $J$; we present numerical evidence that shows only one of these classes survives the continuum limit and this depends on the boundary conditions of the fermion and the gauge field. As such, two of the four possible partition functions are zero in the continuum limit. By defining modified partition functions which do not include the zero modes of the overlap fermions in the fermion determinant, we are able to define an expectation value for a fermion bilinear as ratios of two mixed partition functions. This observable is referred to as the topological condensate and has a non-zero expectation value on any finite physical torus and also has a non-zero limit as the size of the torus is taken to infinity. We study the spectral density of fermions and the scaling of the lowest eigenvalue with the size of the torus to show the absence of any spontaneous symmetry breaking but the emergence of zero modes in the infinite volume limit where it is prohibited in finite volume. These results remain the same for $J = 1, 2, 3, 4$. These results motivate us to propose an independent plaquette model which reproduces the correct physics in the infinite volume limit using a single partition function.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Infinite matrix product states for $(1+1)$-dimensional gauge theories

    hep-th 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A matrix product operator construction using link-enhanced MPOs enables infinite-lattice simulations of (1+1)D gauge theories with manifest translation invariance and symmetry.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Delmastro , author J

    author author D. Delmastro , author J. Gomis , \ and\ author M. Yu ,\ 10.1007/JHEP02(2023)157 journal journal JHEP \ volume 02 ,\ pages 157 ( year 2023 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.02202 arXiv:2108.02202 [hep-th] NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    Approaching the conformal WZW behavior in the infrared limit of two-dimensional massless QCD: a lattice study

    author author N. Karthik , author R. Narayanan , \ and\ author S. A. \ Narayanan ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.054502 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 109 ,\ pages 054502 ( year 2024 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.13929 arXiv:2312.13929 [hep-lat] NoStop

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Dempsey , author I

    author author R. Dempsey , author I. R. \ Klebanov , author L. L. \ Lin , \ and\ author S. S. \ Pufu ,\ 10.1007/JHEP04(2023)107 journal journal JHEP \ volume 04 ,\ pages 107 ( year 2023 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.10895 arXiv:2210.10895 [hep-th] NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Spectrum of two-dimensional $su(2)$ gauge theories coupled to massless fermions in integer representations

    author author R. Narayanan \ and\ author S. A. \ Narayanan ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.094005 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 108 ,\ pages 094005 ( year 2023 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.12887 arXiv:2308.12887 [hep-th] NoStop

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Dempsey , author I

    author author R. Dempsey , author I. R. \ Klebanov , author S. S. \ Pufu , \ and\ author B. T. \ S gaard ,\ 10.1007/JHEP08(2024)009 journal journal JHEP \ volume 08 ,\ pages 009 ( year 2024 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09334 arXiv:2311.09334 [hep-th] NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Bergner , author S

    author author G. Bergner , author S. Piemonte , \ and\ author M. \"Unsal ,\ 10.1007/JHEP07(2024)048 journal journal JHEP \ volume 07 ,\ pages 048 ( year 2024 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.03801 arXiv:2404.03801 [hep-lat] NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    author author P. Y. \ Huet , author R. Narayanan , \ and\ author H. Neuberger ,\ 10.1016/0370-2693(96)00443-1 journal journal Phys. Lett. B \ volume 380 ,\ pages 291 ( year 1996 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9602176 arXiv:hep-th/9602176 NoStop

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  8. [8]

    Cherman , author T

    author author A. Cherman , author T. Jacobson , author Y. Tanizaki , \ and\ author M. \"Unsal ,\ 10.21468/SciPostPhys.8.5.072 journal journal SciPost Phys. \ volume 8 ,\ pages 072 ( year 2020 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1908.09858 arXiv:1908.09858 [hep-th] NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  9. [9]

    't Hooft ,\ 10.1016/0550-3213(79)90595-9 journal journal Nucl

    author author G. 't Hooft ,\ 10.1016/0550-3213(79)90595-9 journal journal Nucl. Phys. B \ volume 153 ,\ pages 141 ( year 1979 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90595-9 1979

  10. [10]

    't Hooft ,\ @noop journal journal Acta Phys

    author author G. 't Hooft ,\ @noop journal journal Acta Phys. Austriaca Suppl. \ volume 22 ,\ pages 531 ( year 1980 ) NoStop

    work page 1980

  11. [11]

    Komargodski , author K

    author author Z. Komargodski , author K. Ohmori , author K. Roumpedakis , \ and\ author S. Seifnashri ,\ 10.1007/jhep03(2021)103 journal journal Journal of High Energy Physics \ volume 2021 ( year 2021 ),\ 10.1007/jhep03(2021)103 NoStop

    doi:10.1007/jhep03(2021)103 2021

  12. [12]

    author author M. M. \ Anber \ and\ author E. Poppitz ,\ 10.1007/JHEP01(2023)118 journal journal JHEP \ volume 01 ,\ pages 118 ( year 2023 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.13568 arXiv:2210.13568 [hep-th] NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    author author M. M. \ Anber \ and\ author E. Poppitz ,\ 10.1007/JHEP02(2025)114 journal journal JHEP \ volume 02 ,\ pages 114 ( year 2025 a ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.16058 arXiv:2408.16058 [hep-th] NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    author author M. M. \ Anber \ and\ author E. Poppitz ,\ @noop journal journal in preparation \ ( year 2025 b ) NoStop

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Banks \ and\ author A

    author author T. Banks \ and\ author A. Casher ,\ 10.1016/0550-3213(80)90255-2 journal journal Nucl. Phys. \ volume B169 ,\ pages 103 ( year 1980 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(80)90255-2 1980

  16. [16]

    Narayanan \ and\ author H

    author author R. Narayanan \ and\ author H. Neuberger ,\ 10.1016/0550-3213(95)00111-5 journal journal Nucl.Phys. \ volume B443 ,\ pages 305 ( year 1995 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9411108 arXiv:hep-th/9411108 [hep-th] NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  17. [17]

    Neuberger ,\ 10.1016/S0370-2693(97)01368-3 journal journal Phys.Lett

    author author H. Neuberger ,\ 10.1016/S0370-2693(97)01368-3 journal journal Phys.Lett. \ volume B417 ,\ pages 141 ( year 1998 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9707022 arXiv:hep-lat/9707022 [hep-lat] NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  18. [18]

    Garcia Perez , author A

    author author M. Garcia Perez , author A. Gonzalez-Arroyo , \ and\ author B. Soderberg ,\ 10.1016/0370-2693(90)90106-G journal journal Phys. Lett. B \ volume 235 ,\ pages 117 ( year 1990 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90)90106-g 1990

  19. [19]

    Meson spectrum of $\text{SU}(2)$ QCD$_{1+1}$ with Quarks in Large Representations

    author author A. Kaushal , author N. S. \ Prabhakar , \ and\ author S. R. \ Wadia ,\ 10.1007/JHEP11(2023)162 journal journal JHEP \ volume 11 ,\ pages 162 ( year 2023 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.15015 arXiv:2307.15015 [hep-th] NoStop

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    A simulation of the Schwinger model in the overlap formalism

    author author R. Narayanan , author H. Neuberger , \ and\ author P. M. \ Vranas ,\ 10.1016/0370-2693(95)00558-3 journal journal Phys. Lett. B \ volume 353 ,\ pages 507 ( year 1995 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9503013 arXiv:hep-lat/9503013 NoStop

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  21. [21]

    author author A. D. \ Kennedy \ and\ author B. J. \ Pendleton ,\ 10.1016/0370-2693(85)91632-6 journal journal Phys. Lett. B \ volume 156 ,\ pages 393 ( year 1985 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)91632-6 1985

  22. [22]

    Creutz ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.36.515 journal journal Phys

    author author M. Creutz ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.36.515 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 36 ,\ pages 515 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.36.515 1987

  23. [23]

    author author S. L. \ Adler ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.23.2901 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 23 ,\ pages 2901 ( year 1981 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.2901 1981

  24. [24]

    author author S. L. \ Adler ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.37.458 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 37 ,\ pages 458 ( year 1988 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.37.458 1988

  25. [25]

    Neuberger ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.1877 journal journal Phys

    author author H. Neuberger ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.1877 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 59 ,\ pages 1877 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.1877 1987

  26. [26]

    author author R. G. \ Edwards , author U. M. \ Heller , \ and\ author R. Narayanan ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.094510 journal journal Phys.Rev. \ volume D59 ,\ pages 094510 ( year 1999 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9811030 arXiv:hep-lat/9811030 [hep-lat] NoStop

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  27. [27]

    Scale-invariance of parity-invariant three-dimensional QED

    author author N. Karthik \ and\ author R. Narayanan ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.065026 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume D94 ,\ pages 065026 ( year 2016 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.04109 arXiv:1606.04109 [hep-th] NoStop

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  28. [28]

    author author J. J. M. \ Verbaarschot \ and\ author T. Wettig ,\ 10.1146/annurev.nucl.50.1.343 journal journal Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. \ volume 50 ,\ pages 343 ( year 2000 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0003017 arXiv:hep-ph/0003017 [hep-ph] NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  29. [29]

    Narayanan \ and\ author H

    author author R. Narayanan \ and\ author H. Neuberger ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.3251 journal journal Phys.Rev.Lett. \ volume 71 ,\ pages 3251 ( year 1993 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9308011 arXiv:hep-lat/9308011 [hep-lat] NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.