Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 97 references

The paper claims that applying a template image to 4D-STEM data — the inverse of the usual mask — yields correlation masks that image specific atom columns, including Li and O, and beat user-defined virtual apertures.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

A template-to-mask correlation imaging method for 4D-STEM is claimed in the abstract, but the supplied full text is an unrelated hep-th paper, leaving the claim unverifiable.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection The submission doesn't contain the paper it claims to—it's an unrelated hep-th manuscript—so there is nothing to referee; the abstract alone suggests a plausible but modest method. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2508.06371 v1 pith:XKAPM4Z5 submitted 2025-08-08 physics.ins-det cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Template masks for 4D-STEM

Yining Xie , Eoin Moynihan , Marin Alexe , Louis Piper , Ana Sanchez , Richard Beanland This is my paper
classification physics.ins-det cond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 68.37.Ma07.78.+s
keywords 4D-STEMtemplate maskcorrelation imagingatom-column imagingmultiple scatteringLiFePO4PbTiO3virtual annular bright field
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a complementary way to analyse atomic-resolution 4D-STEM data: instead of masking the diffraction data to form a virtual image, one applies an image — the template — to the data to obtain a mask, and that mask, being the correlation between the data and the template, yields a scan image optimised for the template. The central claim is that these 'template masks' can image specific atom columns — demonstrated for Li and O in LiFePO4 and for O, Pb, and Ti across a domain wall in PbTiO3 — and that they are a significant improvement over user-defined masks such as virtual annular bright field imaging. A sympathetic reader would care because the procedure is computationally straightforward and general in what template can be queried, and it targets the moderate-thickness regime where multiple scattering produces strong, column-specific diffraction correlations. As submitted, the full text of this record is a different manuscript, a theoretical-physics paper on spectral zeta functions in PT-symmetric quantum mechanics, so the method, simulations, and data behind the abstract's claim are not in the supplied text and cannot be checked against it.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that 4D-STEM data admit a 'template mask' as the dual of the usual virtual-detector mask. Every measured intensity is both a diffraction-pattern pixel and a STEM-image pixel, so a real-space image (template) correlates with the data into a mask; applying it yields an image optimised for the template. The claim is that such masks image specific atom columns — Li and O in LiFePO4, O, Pb, Ti across a PbTiO3 domain wall — improving on virtual annular bright field, especially at moderate thickness where multiple scattering makes correlations strong and specific. The supplied full text is a different manuscript, a theoretical-physics paper on spectral zeta functions, w

What carries the argument

The central object is the 'template mask', the dual of the conventional virtual-detector mask. In ordinary 4D-STEM analysis a user draws a mask on the diffraction pattern to form a virtual image; here the direction is reversed — a real-space image (the template) is applied to the data to produce a mask that shows the correlation between the data and the template, and applying that mask to the data gives an image optimised for the template. The mechanism relies on the dual character of each measured intensity (a diffraction pixel and an image pixel at once) and on the paper's premise that multiple scattering at moderate thickness creates strong, specific correlations in diffraction patterns,

Load-bearing premise

The claim collapses if a single fixed template cannot mark one atom-column type everywhere in the scan: if the diffraction signature of a given column changes with local thickness, tilt, or neighbouring columns, the correlation image stops being column-specific.

What would settle it

Take a 4D-STEM dataset of a known crystal at moderate thickness, fix one template built from a multislice simulation of a single column type, and plot the correlation mask across a region where the specimen thickness changes by a few nanometres. If the correlation maxima drift off the intended column positions or lose specificity with thickness, the premise that one template marks one column type across the whole scan fails. A second check: replace the simulation-based template with a region cut from the same dataset and compare — agreement shows the result is not self-referential, disagreemen

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Column-specific imaging: the method should let users image specific atom columns, including light elements such as Li and O, directly from 4D-STEM data.
  • Generality: any template can be queried, so the same procedure maps a chosen structural motif to a scan image without redesigning detector masks.
  • Claimed advantage: at moderate specimen thickness, template masks are claimed to outperform user-defined masks such as virtual annular bright field imaging.
  • Demonstrated use cases: separate Li/O column images in LiFePO4, and O/Pb/Ti images across a PbTiO3 domain wall, pointing to battery-cathode and ferroelectric-interface characterisation.
  • Practicality: the procedure is computationally straightforward, so it can be applied to full atomic-resolution 4D-STEM datasets.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One testable extension the paper leaves implicit: whether column specificity survives thickness gradients in the specimen — if it degrades, locally adaptive or multi-template correlation would be needed.
  • The provenance of the template is a real degree of freedom: if the template is cut from the same dataset it is applied to, part of the correlation is self-referential; an independent template from multislice simulation or a different zone axis would settle how much this matters.
  • The image/mask duality suggests an inverse route the paper does not explore: instead of choosing a template by hand, search for the template that best separates known column types, linking the technique to unsupervised decomposition of 4D-STEM data.
  • If the exploited contrast really comes from multiple scattering, the method is most valuable in the moderate-thickness regime where conventional STEM imaging loses contrast — making it a complement to, not a replacement for, virtual imaging.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to introduce a new 4D-STEM analysis method, 'template masks,' in which a template image is applied to 4D-STEM diffraction data to produce a mask whose correlation image is said to image specific atom columns (Li and O in LiFePO4; O, Pb, and Ti across a domain wall in PbTiO3). The abstract asserts this is a significant improvement over virtual annular bright-field imaging, especially for moderately thick specimens where multiple scattering creates strong and specific diffraction correlations. However, the supplied full text is not the 4D-STEM paper: it is Syo Kamata's hep-th paper 'Exact Sum Rules and Zeta Generating Formulas from the ODE/IM correspondence' (arXiv:2508.06366v3), whose first page prints that arXiv ID. No methods, data, figures, error analysis, or comparison to ABF are provided. The central claims are therefore unassessable in this submission.

Significance. The underlying idea—using template correlation to construct masks in 4D-STEM—could be a useful contribution to atomic-resolution imaging, particularly if it enables element-selective column imaging under multiple-scattering conditions. The claimed demonstrations are concrete and falsifiable. However, the submission provides no technical content to evaluate novelty, correctness, or practical impact. There are no algorithms, no simulations, no experimental datasets, and no quantitative comparisons. As submitted, the manuscript offers no evidence that the method works or that it improves on existing virtual imaging approaches. The scientific significance cannot be assessed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Supplied full text (p.1)] The full text is an unrelated hep-th paper (Exact Sum Rules and Zeta Generating Formulas from the ODE/IM correspondence by Syo Kamata, arXiv:2508.06366v3), which prints its own arXiv ID on the first page. There is no overlap in content, authors, or subject with the 4D-STEM abstract. Consequently, the manuscript contains no Methods section defining the template, the correlation normalization, the mask construction, or the datasets for LiFePO4 and PbTiO3; no figures; no error analysis; no comparison to ABF. The central claim of the abstract cannot be checked.
  2. [Abstract (template source)] The abstract states that the mask shows 'the correlation between the data and the template' but does not specify whether the template is constructed independently (e.g., from simulations or a separate dataset) or tuned/derived from the same dataset to which it is applied. If the latter, the correlation image is partly self-referential and cannot serve as evidence of column-specific imaging. Since the full text is missing, this load-bearing point cannot be resolved.
  3. [Abstract (improvement claim)] The claim that template masks are 'a significant improvement over user-defined masks such as virtual annular bright field imaging' is unsupported. The abstract provides no quantitative comparisons, no images, no contrast or SNR metrics, and no statistical analysis. Without the actual data and comparison, the claimed improvement is not demonstrated.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The acronym '4D-STEM' is used without expansion; define it at first mention. Also, 'These template masks' should likely be 'These template masks' or 'These masks' for readability.
  2. [General] No references are provided for virtual annular bright-field imaging or for prior template-matching/correlation methods in STEM. If the full text is supplied, this should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No demonstratable circularity; the supplied full text is an unrelated hep-th paper, so the claimed template-mask derivation cannot be checked.

full rationale

The abstract describes a 4D-STEM template-mask method, but the accompanying full text is a different paper: Syo Kamata, 'Exact Sum Rules and Zeta Generating Formulas from the ODE/IM correspondence,' which prints 'arXiv:2508.06366v3 [hep-th]' on its first page. There is therefore no methods section, no definition of the template-mask correlation, no simulations, and no experimental data for the claimed Li/O in LiFePO4 or O/Pb/Ti in PbTiO3 results. Under the hard rule that circularity may only be claimed when a specific equation or fitted quantity can be shown to reduce to its own input by construction, no circular step can be exhibited from the supplied artifact. The abstract's statement that 'an image (template) is applied to the data to obtain a mask. This mask shows the correlation between the data and the template and, when applied to atomic resolution 4D-STEM data produces an image optimised for the template' is a definition of a procedure, not a demonstration that the output is equivalent to the input. The possibility that the template is constructed from the same dataset is an unverified risk about missing methodology, not a demonstrated circularity. Accordingly, the circularity score is 0; the substantive problem is that the submission's central claim is unverifiable as provided.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The delivered manuscript is a different paper (arXiv:2508.06366v3 on spectral zeta functions), so this ledger is reconstructed from the abstract only. The template is the dominant free input; the multiple-scattering specificity premise is the load-bearing assumption; no new physical entities are claimed. The parameter count is artificially low because the methods text is absent.

free parameters (2)
  • Atom-column template (reference image defining the feature to be located)
    The method correlates the data with a template; the template is the central free input and its construction (simulation, theory, or data-derived) is not stated in the abstract. This choice controls what the resulting mask highlights.
  • Correlation-to-image mapping (normalization or thresholding of the correlation)
    Not described in the abstract; any matched-filter imaging needs a rule for turning the correlation field into a displayed image, and that rule is a free choice absent from the available material.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Moderate-thickness multiple scattering produces diffraction-pattern correlations that are strong and specific to individual atom columns
    Abstract: the method is 'particularly effective for specimens of moderate thickness where multiple scattering produces strong and specific correlations.' This physical premise is asserted and is load-bearing for the claimed specificity; it is not demonstrated in the abstract.
  • domain assumption The correlation between data and template yields an image whose bright features correspond to locations of the template's atom column (translation invariance of the diffraction signature)
    The claim that the result 'produces an image optimised for the template' assumes that a template's signature reappears recognizably at each occurrence of that column type. Variation of the signature with thickness, tilt, or environment would break this. Unstated in the abstract.
invented entities (1)
  • Template mask (image-derived mask) no independent evidence
    purpose: Converts a supplied image template into a mask whose application to 4D-STEM data yields a correlation image highlighting specific atom columns.
    This is the paper's central new construct per the abstract. It is an analysis object rather than a physical entity. The abstract provides no independent benchmark for it, and the supplied full text is a different paper, so there is no falsifiable handle outside the stated demonstrations.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Template masks for 4D-STEM." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XKAPM4Z5

@misc{pith2026250806371,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Template masks for 4D-STEM},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XKAPM4Z5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.06371}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We present a new analysis method for atomic resolution four-dimensional scanning transmission electron microscopy (4D-STEM, in which a diffraction pattern is collected at each point of a raster scan of a focused electron beam across the specimen). In 4D-STEM, each measured intensity has a dual character, forming a pixel in a diffraction pattern and, equally, forming a pixel in a STEM image. Applying a mask to the data to obtain a "virtual" bright field or dark field image is widely used and understood. However, there is a complementary procedure, in which an image (template) is applied to the data to obtain a mask. This mask shows the correlation between the data and the template and, when applied to atomic resolution 4D-STEM data produces an image optimised for the template. This allows, for example, imaging of specific atom columns and is a significant improvement over user-defined masks such as virtual annular bright field imaging. We demonstrate the capability of the approach, separately imaging Li and O atom columns in LiFePO4 and O, Pb and Ti across a domain wall in PbTiO3.These template masks provide a computationally straightforward and general method to probe 4D-STEM data. They are particularly effective for specimens of moderate thickness where multiple scattering produces strong and specific correlations in diffraction patterns.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages · 22 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Start from the fusion relations for the QCs,C(n)(E), in theA2M−1 T-system

  2. [2]

    Translate these relations into algebraic identities among the SZFs via the Taylor expansion aroundE= 0

  3. [3]

    − X s∈N ζn(s) s Ω({a1,· · ·, ak}, s)Es # =e −kζ ′ n(0) +e −kζ ′ n(0) X m∈N X t∈Nm 0 |t|>0 (−1)|t|

    Organize the resulting identities into ESRs (at fixed sector) and ZGFs (between sectors), and analyze their selection rules and (non-)invertibility. A key aspect of our strategy is to examine the existence of inverse mappings of the form ζ1 =ζ 1(ζn), i.e. to what extent the ZGFs can be inverted. As we will demonstrate in Sec. IV, such invertibility is not...

  4. [4]

    This difference will be crucial in the discussion of Sec. IVC. 9 In Eqs.(76)(81), we assume thatQ ba∈ba([ba]2 + 1) = 1if ba=∅. 20 +[−6,0,6] 2 + [−2,0,2] 2 + [−2,0,6] 2 + [−2,4,6] 2 + [−6]2 + [0]2 + [6]2 −[−6,−4,−2,0] 2 −[−6,−4,−2,6] 2 −[−6,−4,4,6] 2 −[−6,2,4,6] 2 −[0,2,4,6] 2 +[−6,−4] 2 + [−6,0] 2 + [−6,2] 2 + [−6,6] 2 + [−2,0] 2 + [−2,6] 2 + [0,2] 2 + [0...

    2021

  5. [5]

    ζn1 =ζ n1 (ζn2 )

    After findingΣ (2M) k for allk, imposing the Z2M+2 modulo identification to elements of the sets in the family yieldsΣ(2M) k | mod (2M+2). In theM= 5 2 case, the elements,{∓4}, in the sets are identified as{∓4} ∼ {±3}. The sets in the familyΣ(2M) k |2M+2 are in general subsets ofM \ {±1}. See also the left panel of Fig. 3 for comparison. These results can...

  6. [6]

    Hence, theZ N shift symmetry is broken forM∈N+ 1

    ForM= 3 2 , 5 2, and 7 2, Φ(1) 2M+2 can be specifically expressed by Φ(1) 3+2 = [−2,0,2] 1 −[−2] 1 −[2] 1 −1,(92a) Φ(1) 5+2 = [−3,−2,0,2,3] 1 −[−3,−2,3] 1 −[−3,2,3] 1 −[−3,0,2] 1 −[−2,0,3] 1 + [−3]1 + [0]1 + [3]1 −1,(92b) Φ(1) 7+2 = [−4,−3,−2,0,2,3,4] 1 −[−4,−3,−2,0,3] 1 −[−4,−3,2,3,4] 1 −[−4,−3,−2,3,4] 1 −[−4,−2,0,2,3] 1 −[−3,−2,0,2,4] 1 −[−3,0,2,3,4] 1 ...

  7. [7]

    Notice that unfactorizability of Eq.(27) forM∈N+ 1 2 can be also seen from the mapping to the Chebyshev polynomials in Eq.(66) works when M∈N+ 1but does not whenM∈N+ 1 2. The situation for the selection rule is more complicated than that of theM∈N+ 1case, and another feature arises by including the contribution fromC(n∈K)(0) =e −ζ′ n(0), which is implicit...

  8. [8]

    Completeness and Orthonormality in PT-symmetric Quantum Systems

    S. Weigert, “Completeness and orthonormality in PT-symmetric quantum systems,”Phys. Rev. A68(2003) 062111, arXiv:quant-ph/0306040

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  9. [9]

    These are the building blocks used in Sec

    The fusion relations of the Stokes multipliers In this appendix we recall the derivation of the fusion relations for the Stokes multipliersC(n)(E)and the definition of the SZFs. These are the building blocks used in Sec. II for the construction of the ESRs and ZGFs. In our analysis, we practically need the fusion relations only and do not use the ODE/IM c...

  10. [10]

    −ζ ′(0)− X s∈N ζ(s) s Es # =e −ζ′(0) +e −ζ′(0) X m∈N X t∈Nm 0 |t|>0 (−1)|t|

    The spectral zeta functions In this part, we introduce the spectral zeta functions (SZFs) [82, 83]. We start with a (normalized) QC, denoted byD(E). Suppose that it can be expressed by a spectral determinant as D(E) = Y α∈N0 (Eα −E) = exp " X α∈N0 log(Eα −E) # ,(A15) with an energy spectrum labeled byα,{Eα}α∈N0, whereE α ∈R ≥0,E∈R\ {E α}α∈N0. Trivially, s...

  11. [11]

    Non-Hermitian Physics: from Classical to Quantum and Beyond

    Unlike the case forM∈N+1, the setZ2M+2 /A(3) M+ 1 2 does not carry a group structure, but rather constitutes a quotient set defined with respect to the selection subset A(3) M+ 1 2 . Moreover, this selection rule doesnotcoincide with the shift symmetry ofΦ(1) 2M+2 in Eq.(90). For example, the ESRs forM= 3 2 are written down as (cf. Refs. [85, 86]) ( √ 5−1...

    2024

  12. [12]

    PT symmetric quantum mechanics,

    C. M. Bender, S. Boettcher, and P. Meisinger, “PT symmetric quantum mechanics,”J. Math. Phys.40(1999) 2201–2229,arXiv:quant-ph/9809072

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  13. [13]

    PseudoHermiticity versus PT symmetry. The necessary condition for the reality of the spectrum,

    A. Mostafazadeh, “PseudoHermiticity versus PT symmetry. The necessary condition for the reality of the spectrum,”J. Math. Phys.43(2002) 205–214,arXiv:math-ph/0107001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  14. [14]

    Pseudo-Hermitian Representation of Quantum Mechanics,

    A. Mostafazadeh, “Pseudo-Hermitian Representation of Quantum Mechanics,”Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.7(2010) 1191–1306,arXiv:0810.5643 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  15. [15]

    Real spectra in nonHermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry,

    C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, “Real spectra in nonHermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry,”Phys. Rev. Lett.80 (1998) 5243–5246,arXiv:physics/9712001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  16. [16]

    Spectral equivalences, Bethe Ansatz equations, and reality properties in PT-symmetric quantum mechanics,

    P. Dorey, C. Dunning, and R. Tateo, “Spectral equivalences, Bethe Ansatz equations, and reality properties in PT-symmetric quantum mechanics,”J. Phys. A34(2001) 5679–5704,arXiv:hep-th/0103051

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  17. [17]

    On the reality of the eigenvalues for a class of PT-symmetric oscillators

    K. C. Shin, “On the reality of the eigenvalues for a class of PT symmetric oscillators,”Commun. Math. Phys.229(2002) 543–564,arXiv:math-ph/0201013

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  18. [18]

    Pseudo-Hermiticity and Generalized PT- and CPT-Symmetries

    A. Mostafazadeh, “PseudoHermiticity and generalized PT and CPT symmetries,”J. Math. Phys.44(2003) 974–989, arXiv:math-ph/0209018

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  19. [19]

    Exact PT-Symmetry Is Equivalent to Hermiticity

    A. Mostafazadeh, “Exact PT symmetry is equivalent to Hermiticity,”J. Phys. A36(2003) 7081–7092, arXiv:quant-ph/0304080

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  20. [20]

    The C Operator in PT-Symmetric Quantum Theories

    C. M. Bender, J. Brod, A. Refig, and M. Reuter, “The C Operator in PT-Symmetric Quantum Theories,”J. Phys. A37 (2004) 10139,arXiv:quant-ph/0402026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  21. [21]

    An Equivalent Hermitian Hamiltonian for the non-Hermitian -x^4 Potential

    H. F. Jones and J. Mateo, “An Equivalent Hermitian Hamiltonian for the non-Hermitian -x**4 potential,”Phys. Rev. D 73(2006) 085002,arXiv:quant-ph/0601188

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  22. [22]

    Equivalence of a Complex $\cP\cT$-Symmetric Quartic Hamiltonian and a Hermitian Quartic Hamiltonian with an Anomaly

    C. M. Bender, D. C. Brody, J.-H. Chen, H. F. Jones, K. A. Milton, and M. C. Ogilvie, “Equivalence of a Complex PT-Symmetric Quartic Hamiltonian and a Hermitian Quartic Hamiltonian with an Anomaly,”Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 025016,arXiv:hep-th/0605066

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  23. [23]

    Introduction to PT-symmetric quantum theory,

    C. M. Bender, “Introduction to PT-symmetric quantum theory,”Contemporary Physics46no. 4, (July, 2005) 277–292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00107500072632

    work page doi:10.1080/00107500072632 2005

  24. [24]

    C. M. Bender,PT symmetry in quantum and classical physics. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd, 2019

    2019

  25. [25]

    PT-symmetric quantum mechanics,

    C. M. Bender and D. W. Hook, “PT-symmetric quantum mechanics,”arXiv:2312.17386 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    P T-symmetric quantum field theory inDdimensions,

    C. M. Bender, N. Hassanpour, S. P. Klevansky, and S. Sarkar, “P T-symmetric quantum field theory inDdimensions,” Phys. Rev. D98no. 12, (2018) 125003,arXiv:1810.12479 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  27. [27]

    Towards perturbative renormalization of $\phi^2(i\phi)^\varepsilon$ quantum field theory

    A. Felski, C. M. Bender, S. P. Klevansky, and S. Sarkar, “Towards perturbative renormalization ofϕ2(iϕ)ϵquantum field theory,”Phys. Rev. D104no. 8, (2021) 085011,arXiv:2103.07577 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    P TSymmetry and Renormalisation in Quantum Field Theory,

    C. M. Bender, A. Felski, S. P. Klevansky, and S. Sarkar, “P TSymmetry and Renormalisation in Quantum Field Theory,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser.2038(2021) 012004,arXiv:2103.14864 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2038

  29. [29]

    PT symmetric fermionic field theories with axions: Renormalization and dynamical mass generation

    N. E. Mavromatos, S. Sarkar, and A. Soto, “PT symmetric fermionic field theories with axions: Renormalization and dynamical mass generation,”Phys. Rev. D106no. 1, (2022) 015009,arXiv:2111.05131 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Functional renormalization group for non-Hermitian and $\mathcal{PT}$-symmetric systems

    L. Grunwald, V. Meden, and D. M. Kennes, “Functional renormalization group for non-Hermitian andPT-symmetric systems,”SciPost Phys.12no. 5, (2022) 179,arXiv:2203.08108 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    Instantons, analytic continuation, and $\mathcal{PT}$-symmetric field theory

    S. Lawrence, R. Weller, C. Peterson, and P. Romatschke, “Instantons, analytic continuation, and PT-symmetric field theory,”Phys. Rev. D108no. 8, (2023) 085013,arXiv:2303.01470 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    On the negative coupling O(N) model in 2d at high temperature,

    P. Romatschke, “On the negative coupling O(N) model in 2d at high temperature,”JHEP04(2025) 012, arXiv:2412.10496 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Chern-Simons gravity and PT Symmetry

    N. E. Mavromatos and S. Sarkar, “Chern-Simons gravity and PT symmetry,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 4, (2024) 045004, arXiv:2402.14513 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Phases of quartic scalar theories and PT symmetry

    L. Chen and S. Sarkar, “Phases of quartic scalar theories and PT symmetry,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 2, (2025) 025001, arXiv:2409.05439 [quant-ph]. 33

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    PT symmetric fermionic particle oscillations in even dimensional representations,

    L. Chen and S. Sarkar, “PT symmetric fermionic particle oscillations in even dimensional representations,”Phys. Rev. D 110no. 9, (2024) 096008,arXiv:2407.02036 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Observation of parity–time symmetry in optics,

    C. E. Rüter, K. G. Makris, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, M. Segev, and D. Kip, “Observation of parity–time symmetry in optics,”Nature physics6no. 3, (2010) 192–195

    2010

  37. [37]

    Single-mode laser by parity-time symmetry breaking,

    L. Feng, Z. J. Wong, R.-M. Ma, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, “Single-mode laser by parity-time symmetry breaking,”Science 346no. 6212, (2014) 972–975

    2014

  38. [38]

    Parity-time–symmetric microring lasers,

    H. Hodaei, M.-A. Miri, M. Heinrich, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, “Parity-time–symmetric microring lasers,”Science346no. 6212, (2014) 975–978

    2014

  39. [39]

    Non-hermitian physics and pt symmetry,

    R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Musslimani, S. Rotter, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Non-hermitian physics and pt symmetry,”Nature Physics14no. 1, (2018) 11–19

    2018

  40. [40]

    Parity–time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics,

    Ş. K. Özdemir, S. Rotter, F. Nori, and L. Yang, “Parity–time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics,”Nature materials18no. 8, (2019) 783–798

    2019

  41. [41]

    Exceptional points in optics and photonics,

    M.-A. Miri and A. Alu, “Exceptional points in optics and photonics,”Science363no. 6422, (2019) eaar7709

    2019

  42. [42]

    Non-hermitian physics,

    Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, “Non-hermitian physics,”Advances in Physics69no. 3, (2020) 249–435

    work page 2020

  43. [43]

    Generalized Nonanalytic Expansions, PT-Symmetry and Large-Order Formulas for Odd Anharmonic Oscillators,

    U. D. Jentschura, A. Surzhykov, and J. Zinn-Justin, “Generalized Nonanalytic Expansions, PT-Symmetry and Large-Order Formulas for Odd Anharmonic Oscillators,”SIGMA5(2009) 005,arXiv:0901.1858 [math-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  44. [44]

    Exact WKB analysis of the vacuum pair production by time-dependent electric fields,

    H. Taya, T. Fujimori, T. Misumi, M. Nitta, and N. Sakai, “Exact WKB analysis of the vacuum pair production by time-dependent electric fields,”JHEP03(2021) 082,arXiv:2010.16080 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  45. [45]

    PT-symmetric -gφ4 theory,

    W.-Y. Ai, C. M. Bender, and S. Sarkar, “PT-symmetric -gφ4 theory,”Phys. Rev. D106no. 12, (2022) 125016, arXiv:2209.07897 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  46. [46]

    Exact WKB analysis for PT-symmetric quantum mechanics: Study of the Ai-Bender-Sarkar conjecture,

    S. Kamata, “Exact WKB analysis for PT-symmetric quantum mechanics: Study of the Ai-Bender-Sarkar conjecture,” Phys. Rev. D109no. 8, (2024) 085023,arXiv:2401.00574 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Exact quantization conditions and full transseries structures for PT symmetric anharmonic oscillators,

    S. Kamata, “Exact quantization conditions and full transseries structures for PT symmetric anharmonic oscillators,” Phys. Rev. D110no. 4, (2024) 045022,arXiv:2406.01230 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Non-perturbative formulation of resonances in quantum mechanics based on exact WKB method,

    O. Morikawa and S. Ogawa, “Non-perturbative formulation of resonances in quantum mechanics based on exact WKB method,”arXiv:2503.18741 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  49. [49]

    Unified exact WKB framework for resonance – Zel’dovich/complex-scaling regularization and rigged Hilbert space,

    O. Morikawa and S. Ogawa, “Unified exact WKB framework for resonance – Zel’dovich/complex-scaling regularization and rigged Hilbert space,”arXiv:2505.02301 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  50. [50]

    The return of the quartic oscillator. The complex WKB method,

    Voros, A., “The return of the quartic oscillator. The complex WKB method,”Annales de l’I.H.P. Physique théorique39 no. 3, (1983) 211–338

    work page 1983

  51. [51]

    Resurgent methods in semiclassical asymptotics,

    E. Delabaere and F. Pham, “Resurgent methods in semiclassical asymptotics,”Ann. Inst. H. Poincare71(1999) 1–94

    work page 1999

  52. [52]

    The Bender-Wu analysis and the Voros theory. II,

    T. Aoki, T. Kawai, and Y. Takei, “The Bender-Wu analysis and the Voros theory. II,”Adv. Stud. Pure Math. (Math. Soc. Japan)54(2009) 19–94

    work page 2009

  53. [53]

    Sato’s conjecture for the Weber equation and transformation theory for Schrödinger equations with a merging pair of turning points,

    Y. Takei, “Sato’s conjecture for the Weber equation and transformation theory for Schrödinger equations with a merging pair of turning points,”RIMS Kokyuroku BessatsuB10(2008) 205–224

    work page 2008

  54. [54]

    On exact-WKB analysis, resurgent structure, and quantization conditions,

    N. Sueishi, S. Kamata, T. Misumi, and M. Ünsal, “On exact-WKB analysis, resurgent structure, and quantization conditions,”JHEP12(2020) 114,arXiv:2008.00379 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  55. [55]

    Exact-WKB, complete resurgent structure, and mixed anomaly in quantum mechanics on S1,

    N. Sueishi, S. Kamata, T. Misumi, and M. Ünsal, “Exact-WKB, complete resurgent structure, and mixed anomaly in quantum mechanics on S1,”JHEP07(2021) 096,arXiv:2103.06586 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  56. [56]

    Exact WKB analysis for SUSY and quantum deformed potentials: Quantum mechanics with Grassmann fields and Wess-Zumino terms,

    S. Kamata, T. Misumi, N. Sueishi, and M. Ünsal, “Exact WKB analysis for SUSY and quantum deformed potentials: Quantum mechanics with Grassmann fields and Wess-Zumino terms,”Phys. Rev. D107no. 4, (2023) 045019, arXiv:2111.05922 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  57. [57]

    A Solvable Deformation of Quantum Mechanics,

    A. Grassi and M. Mariño, “A Solvable Deformation of Quantum Mechanics,”SIGMA15(2019) 025,arXiv:1806.01407 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  58. [58]

    An anharmonic alliance: exact WKB meets EPT,

    B. Bucciotti, T. Reis, and M. Serone, “An anharmonic alliance: exact WKB meets EPT,”JHEP11(2023) 124, arXiv:2309.02505 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  59. [59]

    Exact WKB analysis for adiabatic discrete-level Hamiltonians

    T. Suzuki, E. Taniguchi, and K. Iwamura, “Exact WKB analysis for adiabatic discrete-level Hamiltonians,” arXiv:2311.05871 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [60]

    Quantum Hamilton-Jacobi theory, spectral path integrals, and exact WKB analysis,

    M. Türe and M. Ünsal, “Quantum Hamilton-Jacobi theory, spectral path integrals, and exact WKB analysis,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 10, (2025) 105010,arXiv:2406.07829 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Exact WKB in all sectors. Part I. Potentials with degenerate saddles,

    T. Misumi and C. Pazarbaşı, “Exact WKB in all sectors. Part I. Potentials with degenerate saddles,”JHEP04(2025) 100,arXiv:2410.09511 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    Anharmonic oscillators, the thermodynamic Bethe ansatz, and nonlinear integral equations,

    P. Dorey and R. Tateo, “Anharmonic oscillators, the thermodynamic Bethe ansatz, and nonlinear integral equations,”J. 34 Phys. A32(1999) L419–L425,arXiv:hep-th/9812211

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  63. [63]

    On the relation between Stokes multipliers and the T-Q systems of conformal field theory,

    P. Dorey and R. Tateo, “On the relation between Stokes multipliers and the T-Q systems of conformal field theory,” Nucl. Phys. B563(1999) 573–602,arXiv:hep-th/9906219. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 603, 581–581 (2001)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  64. [64]

    Differential equations for general SU(n) Bethe ansatz systems,

    P. Dorey, C. Dunning, and R. Tateo, “Differential equations for general SU(n) Bethe ansatz systems,”J. Phys. A33 (2000) 8427–8442,arXiv:hep-th/0008039

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  65. [65]

    Integrable structure of conformal field theory. 2. Q operator and DDV equation,

    V. V. Bazhanov, S. L. Lukyanov, and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Integrable structure of conformal field theory. 2. Q operator and DDV equation,”Commun. Math. Phys.190(1997) 247–278,arXiv:hep-th/9604044

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  66. [66]

    Integrable structure of conformal field theory. 3. The Yang-Baxter relation,

    V. V. Bazhanov, S. L. Lukyanov, and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Integrable structure of conformal field theory. 3. The Yang-Baxter relation,”Commun. Math. Phys.200(1999) 297–324,arXiv:hep-th/9805008

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  67. [67]

    Spectral determinants for Schroedinger equation and Q operators of conformal field theory,

    V. V. Bazhanov, S. L. Lukyanov, and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Spectral determinants for Schroedinger equation and Q operators of conformal field theory,”J. Statist. Phys.102(2001) 567–576,hep-th/9812247

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  68. [68]

    On the ODE/IM correspondence for minimal models,

    P. Dorey, C. Dunning, F. Gliozzi, and R. Tateo, “On the ODE/IM correspondence for minimal models,”J. Phys. A41 (2008) 132001,arXiv:0712.2010 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  69. [69]

    Quantum Sine(h)-Gordon Model and Classical Integrable Equations,

    S. L. Lukyanov and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Quantum Sine(h)-Gordon Model and Classical Integrable Equations,”JHEP 07(2010) 008,arXiv:1003.5333 [math-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  70. [70]

    The Bethe Ansatz and the Tzitz\'eica-Bullough-Dodd equation

    P. Dorey, S. Faldella, S. Negro, and R. Tateo, “The Bethe Ansatz and the Tzitzeica-Bullough-Dodd equation,”Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A371(2013) 20120052,arXiv:1209.5517 [math-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  71. [71]

    ODE/IM correspondence for the Fateev model

    S. Lukyanov, “ODE/IM correspondence for the Fateev model,”JHEP12(2013) 012,arXiv:1303.2566

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  72. [72]

    ODE/IM correspondence and Bethe ansatz for affine Toda field equations,

    K. Ito and C. Locke, “ODE/IM correspondence and Bethe ansatz for affine Toda field equations,”Nucl. Phys. B896 (2015) 763–778,arXiv:1502.00906 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  73. [73]

    ODE/IM correspondence and modified affine Toda field equations,

    K. Ito and C. Locke, “ODE/IM correspondence and modified affine Toda field equations,”Nucl. Phys. B885(2014) 600–619,arXiv:1312.6759 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  74. [74]

    ODE/IM correspondence and the Argyres-Douglas theory,

    K. Ito and H. Shu, “ODE/IM correspondence and the Argyres-Douglas theory,”JHEP08(2017) 071,arXiv:1707.03596 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  75. [75]

    The spectrum of the transfer matrices connected with kac-moody algebras,

    N. Y. Reshetikhin, “The spectrum of the transfer matrices connected with kac-moody algebras,”letters in mathematical physics14no. 3, (1987) 235–246

    work page 1987

  76. [76]

    Hidden quantum group symmetry and integrable perturbations of conformal field theories,

    N. Reshetikhin and F. Smirnov, “Hidden quantum group symmetry and integrable perturbations of conformal field theories,”Commun. Math. Phys.131(1990) 157–177

    work page 1990

  77. [77]

    Conformal weights of RSOS lattice models and their fusion hierarchies,

    Klümper, Andreas and Pearce, Paul A., “Conformal weights of RSOS lattice models and their fusion hierarchies,”Physica A183(1992) 304–350

    work page 1992

  78. [78]

    Functional relations in solvable lattice models i: Functional relations and representation theory,

    A. Kuniba, T. Nakanishi, and J. Suzuki, “Functional relations in solvable lattice models i: Functional relations and representation theory,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A9(1994) 5215–5266,hep-th/9309137

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  79. [79]

    Integrable structure of conformal field theory, quantum KdV theory and thermodynamic Bethe ansatz,

    V. V. Bazhanov, S. L. Lukyanov, and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Integrable structure of conformal field theory, quantum KdV theory and thermodynamic Bethe ansatz,”Commun. Math. Phys.177(1996) 381–398,arXiv:hep-th/9412229

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  80. [80]

    Spin generalization of the ruijsenaars-schneider model, non-abelian 2d toda chain and representations of sklyanin algebra,

    I. M. Krichever and A. Zabrodin, “Spin generalization of the ruijsenaars-schneider model, non-abelian 2d toda chain and representations of sklyanin algebra,”Russ. Math. Surveys50no. 6, (1995) 1101–1150

    work page 1995

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.