Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 52 references

Observation of momentum dependent charge density wave gap in EuTe4

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read ARPES shows that the charge density wave in EuTe4 opens a momentum-dependent gap at the Fermi level, largest along the Gamma–Y direction, with separate hybridization gaps at lower binding energies.

desk verdict The submission's body is the GLM-4.5 LLM report, not the EuTe4 paper, so the CDW claim is unverifiable from this copy despite an interesting abstract. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.06464 v1 pith:RLOG3UIP submitted 2025-08-08 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Iftakhar Bin Elius , Nathan Valadez , Gyanendra Dhakal , Volodymyr Buturlim , Sabin Regmi , Dante James , Peter Radanovich , Matthew Yankowitz
show 5 more authors
Tetiana Romanova Andrzej Ptok Krzysztof Gofryk Dariusz Kaczorowski Madhab Neupane
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 71.45.Lr79.60.-i
keywords EuTe4chargedensitywaveARPESFermisurfacenestingmomentum-dependentgapfunctionaltheorymagneticphasediagramrare-earthtelluride
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that in the layered rare-earth telluride EuTe4, the charge density wave (CDW) opens a gap directly at the Fermi level, not merely at lower binding energies. ARPES reveals that this Fermi-level gap is anisotropic: largest along the Gamma–Y high-symmetry direction and smallest along Gamma–X. DFT calculations are used to connect the observed band modifications to CDW modulation, and heat-capacity measurements in applied magnetic fields map the antiferromagnetic phase boundary near the Neel temperature of about 6.9 K. If the claim holds, EuTe4 becomes a concrete platform where Fermi-surface-nesting-driven CDW order coexists with 4f-electron magnetism.

What carries the argument

The central object is the momentum-resolved electronic gap measured by ARPES across the CDW-modulated Fermi surface, with the Gamma–Y versus Gamma–X anisotropy as the discriminating observable. DFT on the CDW-modulated lattice supplies the band-structure interpretation, and heat capacity in magnetic fields locates the magnetic transition used to construct the phase diagram.

What would settle it

Measure ARPES spectra as a function of temperature through the CDW transition: if the Fermi-level gap along Gamma–Y closes above the CDW transition and reopens below, while the lower-binding-energy hybridization gaps persist, the CDW-gap claim is supported; if the suppression remains above the transition or follows the 6.9 K magnetic transition instead, the assignment fails. A complementary check is to recompute the band structure with different treatments of the Eu 4f electrons, such as adding an on-site Coulomb repulsion, and see whether the Gamma–Y versus Gamma–X anisotropy survives.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the CDW transition in EuTe4 opens a gap at the Fermi level whose magnitude depends on momentum: it is maximal near the Gamma–Y direction and minimal near Gamma–X. The abstract identifies this Fermi-level gap as the CDW gap, while reporting additional hybridization-induced gap features at lower binding energies. The evidence combines ARPES spectral suppression at the Fermi level with first-principles DFT band-structure calculations for the CDW-modulated phase; low-temperature heat capacity in applied fields places the antiferromagnetic ordering at T_N approximately 6.9 K and yields a magnetic phase diagram. The paper thus reads the direction-dependent gap as the sign

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the loss of spectral intensity seen at the Fermi level is really a charge-density-wave gap and not a byproduct of electron mixing or electron correlation; a second fragile assumption is that the electronic-structure calculation, whose details are not given, correctly captures the CDW-modulated bands of a material with 4f electrons.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A Fermi-level CDW gap with maximum along Gamma–Y and minimum along Gamma–X means the low-energy electronic structure of EuTe4 is direction-dependent, so directional transport and optical probes should see the same anisotropy.
  • The coexistence of a Fermi-level CDW gap and lower-binding-energy hybridization gaps implies two distinct energy scales in the same electronic system.
  • The heat-capacity-derived magnetic phase diagram near T_N approximately 6.9 K gives a baseline for separating magnetic and CDW contributions in later measurements.
  • If the DFT band structure correctly captures the CDW modulation, EuTe4 becomes a testbed for Fermi-surface-nesting-driven CDW order in rare-earth tellurides.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reported ARPES data do not include a temperature sweep across the CDW transition; a temperature-dependent measurement would directly test the assignment by checking whether the Fermi-level gap closes above the CDW transition while the lower-binding-energy hybridization gaps persist.
  • The 6.9 K feature is identified as magnetic, but the paper does not state the CDW transition temperature; determining whether CDW order sets in above or below the magnetic order would clarify whether the two orders compete or cooperate.
  • Because the DFT functional and treatment of the Eu 4f electrons are not described, recomputing the band structure with an explicit on-site Coulomb interaction on the 4f shell would test whether the Gamma–Y anisotropy survives the choice of electronic-structure method.
  • If confirmed, the same anisotropic-gap measurement could be extended to other layered rare-earth tellurides to ask whether the nesting-driven gap mechanism is generic.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The abstract of arXiv:2508.06464 reports a combined ARPES, DFT, and heat-capacity study of the charge density wave (CDW) in EuTe4. The central claims are: (i) ARPES reveals a CDW gap at the Fermi level together with hybridization-induced gap features at lower binding energy; (ii) the low-lying gap is momentum-dependent, maximal along Γ–Y and minimal along Γ–X; and (iii) low-temperature heat capacity in applied magnetic fields near TN ≈ 6.9 K maps the magnetic phase diagram. The submitted full text, however, is arXiv:2508.06471, the GLM-4.5 large language model technical report, which is entirely unrelated to EuTe4. Consequently, no methods, data, fitting procedures, error bars, DFT settings, or experimental details are available to support the abstract's claims.

Significance. If substantiated, the reported observation of a momentum-dependent CDW gap in EuTe4—maximum along Γ–Y and minimum along Γ–X—would be a useful contribution to the physics of low-dimensional rare-earth chalcogenides, where CDW order coexists with 4f magnetism. The proposed link between Fermi-surface nesting and the anisotropic gap, and the magnetic phase diagram from heat capacity, are also of interest. However, the manuscript as submitted contains no substantive technical content: the full text is an unrelated LLM technical report. There are no reproducible scripts, parameter-free derivations, or falsifiable predictions beyond the abstract. The significance cannot be assessed until the correct full text is supplied.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text (entire document)] The submitted full text is the GLM-4.5 technical report (arXiv:2508.06471), which has no overlap with the EuTe4 abstract. Every claim in the abstract—the ARPES CDW gap, its anisotropy, the DFT band modifications, and the heat-capacity phase diagram—is therefore unsupported by any presented evidence. This is a load-bearing document-level error: the central result cannot be checked, and no target revision can fix it other than replacing the full text with the actual EuTe4 manuscript. As submitted, the paper cannot be evaluated.
  2. [Abstract (gap assignment)] The abstract states that ARPES reveals 'a CDW gap at the Fermi level' and separately 'hybridization induced gap features at lower binding energies.' Without spectra, momentum-distribution-curve/energy-distribution-curve fits, or error bars, the assignment of the near-EF suppression to CDW rather than to hybridization or correlation effects is unsupported. The two gap features must be resolved with quantitative fitting and compared to the DFT band structure.
  3. [Abstract (DFT calculation)] The DFT calculation is described only as 'first principles based density functional theory.' No functional, exchange-correlation approximation, treatment of 4f electrons (e.g., Hubbard U), spin-orbit coupling, CDW supercell, or method for comparing calculated band modifications to ARPES is given. Since the abstract attributes the CDW to Fermi-surface nesting and uses DFT to support the gap anisotropy, these details are essential and currently absent.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The high-symmetry labels are inconsistent: 'Gamma-Y' and 'GX' should both be typeset as Γ–Y and Γ–X; 'GX' in particular is ambiguous.
  2. [Abstract] 'Neel temperature' should be 'Néel temperature'; 'low lying' should be hyphenated as 'low-lying'; 'First principles based density functional theory' could be simplified to 'first-principles density functional theory.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation chain is present; the submitted full text is an unrelated LLM report, so no input-equivalent reduction can be exhibited.

full rationale

The claimed scientific result in the abstract—ARPES revealing a momentum-dependent CDW gap in EuTe4, with DFT band-structure modifications and heat-capacity phase diagram—is not accompanied by any of the manuscript sections, equations, fitting procedures, or data analysis that would constitute a derivation chain. The full text supplied is the GLM-4.5 technical report (arXiv:2508.06471), which contains no overlap with the EuTe4 abstract. Because the circularity analysis requires quoting the paper and exhibiting a specific reduction (e.g., Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction, or a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction), and because no such reduction is present or even reconstructible from the available document, no circular step can be identified. The document-level mismatch is a severe verifiability problem—the central claim is uncheckable from the submitted text—but it is not circularity. The residual risk noted in the reader's take, namely that ARPES/DFT agreement might have been tuned or that the Fermi-level gap assignment to CDW rather than hybridization is underdetermined, is a missing-evidence objection and cannot be elevated to a circularity finding under the hard rules. Therefore the appropriate score is 0, with no circular steps listed.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters can be identified because the only available text about EuTe4 is the abstract, which reports no numbers or fits. No new particles, fields, or entities are proposed. The three axioms above are the assumptions the abstract's claims rest on; each would need the actual paper's methods and data to be checked.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption DFT with the chosen functional(s) adequately describes the CDW-modulated electronic structure of EuTe4, a 4f-electron material.
    Invoked by the abstract: 'First principles based density functional theory (DFT) calculations were carried out to investigate the electronic band structure modifications arising from CDW modulation.' Correlated 4f systems strain DFT; no functional or approximation is stated.
  • domain assumption The Fermi-level spectral feature seen in ARPES is a CDW gap and not a hybridization gap, surface state, or matrix-element effect.
    The abstract simultaneously mentions a CDW gap at the Fermi level and hybridization-induced gap features at lower binding energies; the classification of the low-lying gap as CDW is load-bearing and unverifiable from the abstract.
  • domain assumption Fermi surface nesting is the operative driver of the CDW ordering.
    The abstract concludes with 'directional dependent evolution of the Fermi surface nesting induced CDW ordering'; nesting as the mechanism is assumed, not demonstrated, and momentum-dependent gaps are consistent with several CDW mechanisms.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Observation of momentum dependent charge density wave gap in EuTe4." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RLOG3UIP

@misc{pith2026250806464,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Observation of momentum dependent charge density wave gap in EuTe4},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RLOG3UIP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.06464}
}
read the original abstract

The occurrence of charge density wave (CDW) phenomena, particularly in low dimensional rare-earth chalcogenides, has attracted substantial research interest. Among these materials, EuTe4, which features multiple Te layers and a single Eu-Te layer, serves as a promising platform to study the interplay between CDW order and 4f electron configurations, including magnetism. In this study, First principles based density functional theory (DFT) calculations were carried out to investigate the electronic band structure modifications arising from CDW modulation. Angle resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) revealed the emergence of a CDW gap at the Fermi level, as well as hybridization induced gap features at lower binding energies. The low lying CDW gap reaches its maximum along the Gamma-Y high-symmetry direction and a minimum along GX reflecting the anisotropic nature of the electronic structure. We also performed low temperature heat capacity measurements in applied magnetic fields near the Neel temperature (TN ~ 6.9 K) to construct the magnetic phase diagram of EuTe4. This study provides valuable insight into the directional dependent evolution of the Fermi surface nesting induced CDW ordering, along with other observed gap openings within this system.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 27 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Abbas, K

    A. Abbas, K. Tirumala, D. Simig, S. Ganguli, and A. S. Morcos. Semdedup: Data-efficient learning at web-scale through semantic deduplication. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.09540, 2023

    arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    C. An, Z. Xie, X. Li, L. Li, J. Zhang, S. Gong, M. Zhong, J. Xu, X. Qiu, M. Wang, and L. Kong. Polaris: A post-training recipe for scaling reinforcement learning on advanced reasoning models, 2025

    2025

  3. [3]

    Y . Bai, X. Lv, J. Zhang, H. Lyu, J. Tang, Z. Huang, Z. Du, X. Liu, A. Zeng, L. Hou, et al. Longbench: A bilingual, multitask benchmark for long context understanding. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 3119–3137, 2024

    2024

  4. [4]

    Y . Bai, S. Tu, J. Zhang, H. Peng, X. Wang, X. Lv, S. Cao, J. Xu, L. Hou, Y . Dong, J. Tang, and J. Li. LongBench v2: Towards deeper understanding and reasoning on realistic long-context multitasks. In Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 3639–3664, Vienna, Austria, July 202...

    2025

  5. [5]

    Bavarian, H

    M. Bavarian, H. Jun, N. Tezak, J. Schulman, C. McLeavey, J. Tworek, and M. Chen. Efficient training of language models to fill in the middle, 2022

    2022

  6. [6]

    Brown, B

    T. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. D. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell, et al. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:1877–1901, 2020

    1901

  7. [7]

    A. Chen, A. Li, B. Gong, B. Jiang, B. Fei, B. Yang, B. Shan, C. Yu, C. Wang, C. Zhu, et al. Minimax-m1: Scaling test-time compute efficiently with lightning attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.13585, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    M. Chen, J. Tworek, H. Jun, Q. Yuan, H. P. D. O. Pinto, J. Kaplan, H. Edwards, Y . Burda, N. Joseph, G. Brockman, et al. Evaluating large language models trained on code. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03374, 2021

    arXiv 2021

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Cheng, Y

    S. Cheng, Y . Bao, Q. Cao, L. Huang, L. Kang, Z. Liu, Y . Lu, W. Zhu, Z. Huang, T. Li, et al. Seed-x: Building strong multilingual translation llm with 7b parameters. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.13618, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Deshpande, V

    K. Deshpande, V . Sirdeshmukh, J. B. Mols, L. Jin, E.-Y . Hernandez-Cardona, D. Lee, J. Kritz, W. E. Primack, S. Yue, and C. Xing. Multichallenge: A realistic multi-turn conversation evalua- tion benchmark challenging to frontier llms. In Findings of the Association for Comput...

    2025

  3. [11]

    H. Ding, Z. Wang, G. Paolini, V . Kumar, A. Deoras, D. Roth, and S. Soatto. Fewer truncations improve language modeling. In Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 11030–11048, 2024

    2024

  4. [12]

    Gloeckle, B

    F. Gloeckle, B. Y . Idrissi, B. Rozière, D. Lopez-Paz, and G. Synnaeve. Better & faster large language models via multi-token prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.19737, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    D. Guo, D. Yang, H. Zhang, J. Song, R. Zhang, R. Xu, Q. Zhu, S. Ma, P. Wang, X. Bi, et al. Deepseek-r1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12948, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Hendrycks, C

    D. Hendrycks, C. Burns, S. Kadavath, A. Arora, S. Basart, E. Tang, D. Song, and J. Steinhardt. Measuring mathematical problem solving with the math dataset. In Thirty-fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track (Round 2)

  7. [15]

    Henry, P

    A. Henry, P. R. Dachapally, S. Pawar, and Y . Chen. Query-key normalization for transformers, 2020

    2020

  8. [16]

    Hsieh, S

    C.-P. Hsieh, S. Sun, S. Kriman, S. Acharya, D. Rekesh, F. Jia, and B. Ginsburg. Ruler: What’s the real context size of your long-context language models? In First Conference on Language Modeling. 23

  9. [17]

    S. Hu, Y . Tu, X. Han, G. Cui, C. He, W. Zhao, X. Long, Z. Zheng, Y . Fang, Y . Huang, et al. Minicpm: Unveiling the potential of small language models with scalable training strategies. In First Conference on Language Modeling

  10. [18]

    Jaech, A

    A. Jaech, A. Kalai, A. Lerer, A. Richardson, A. El-Kishky, A. Low, A. Helyar, A. Madry, A. Beutel, A. Carney, et al. Openai o1 system card. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.16720, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    N. Jain, K. Han, A. Gu, W.-D. Li, F. Yan, T. Zhang, S. Wang, A. Solar-Lezama, K. Sen, and I. Stoica. Livecodebench: Holistic and contamination free evaluation of large language models for code. In The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations

  12. [20]

    C. E. Jimenez, J. Yang, A. Wettig, S. Yao, K. Pei, O. Press, and K. Narasimhan. Swe-bench: Can language models resolve real-world github issues? arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06770, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Jordan, Y

    K. Jordan, Y . Jin, V . Boza, Y . Jiacheng, F. Cecista, L. Newhouse, and J. Bern- stein. Muon: An optimizer for hidden layers in neural networks, 2024. URL https://kellerjordan.github.io/posts/muon, 6

    2024

  14. [22]

    Joulin, E

    A. Joulin, E. Grave, P. Bojanowski, and T. Mikolov. Bag of tricks for efficient text classification. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Compu- tational Linguistics: Volume 2, Short Papers, pages 427–431. Association for Computa...

    2017

  15. [23]

    A. Liu, B. Feng, B. Xue, B. Wang, B. Wu, C. Lu, C. Zhao, C. Deng, C. Zhang, C. Ruan, et al. Deepseek-v3 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.19437, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    J. Liu, J. Su, X. Yao, Z. Jiang, G. Lai, Y . Du, Y . Qin, W. Xu, E. Lu, J. Yan, et al. Muon is scalable for llm training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.16982, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  17. [25]

    M. Luo, S. Tan, J. Wong, X. Shi, W. Y . Tang, M. Roongta, C. Cai, J. Luo, L. E. Li, R. A. Popa, and I. Stoica. Deepscaler: Surpassing o1-preview with a 1.5b model by scaling rl. https://pretty-radio-b75.notion.site/DeepScaleR-Surpassing-O1-Preview-with-a-1-5B-Model- by-Scaling...

    2025

  18. [26]

    S. G. Patil, H. Mao, C. Cheng-Jie Ji, F. Yan, V . Suresh, I. Stoica, and J. E. Gonzalez. The berkeley function calling leaderboard (bfcl): From tool use to agentic evaluation of large language models. In Forty-second International Conference on Machine Learning, 2025

    2025

  19. [27]

    Penedo, H

    G. Penedo, H. Kydlí ˇcek, V . Sabolˇcec, B. Messmer, N. Foroutan, A. H. Kargaran, C. Raffel, M. Jaggi, L. V on Werra, and T. Wolf. Fineweb2: One pipeline to scale them all–adapting pre-training data processing to every language. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.20920, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  20. [28]

    L. Phan, A. Gatti, Z. Han, N. Li, J. Hu, H. Zhang, C. B. C. Zhang, M. Shaaban, J. Ling, S. Shi, et al. Humanity’s last exam. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.14249, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Y . Qin, T. Zhang, Y . Shen, W. Luo, Y . Zhang, Y . Qiao, Z. Zhou, W. Zhang, B. CUI, et al. Sysbench: Can llms follow system message? In The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024

    2024

  22. [30]

    D. Rein, B. L. Hou, A. C. Stickland, J. Petty, R. Y . Pang, J. Dirani, J. Michael, and S. R. Bowman. Gpqa: A graduate-level google-proof q&a benchmark. In First Conference on Language Modeling, 2024

    2024

  23. [31]

    Z. Shao, P. Wang, Q. Zhu, R. Xu, J. Song, X. Bi, H. Zhang, M. Zhang, Y . Li, Y . Wu, et al. Deepseekmath: Pushing the limits of mathematical reasoning in open language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03300, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    D. Su, K. Kong, Y . Lin, J. Jennings, B. Norick, M. Kliegl, M. Patwary, M. Shoeybi, and B. Catanzaro. Nemotron-cc: Transforming common crawl into a refined long-horizon pretraining dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.02595, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    G. Team, R. Anil, S. Borgeaud, J.-B. Alayrac, J. Yu, R. Soricut, J. Schalkwyk, A. M. Dai, A. Hauth, K. Millican, et al. Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805, 2023. 24

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    K. Team, Y . Bai, Y . Bao, G. Chen, J. Chen, N. Chen, R. Chen, Y . Chen, Y . Chen, Y . Chen, et al. Kimi k2: Open agentic intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.20534, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  27. [35]

    T. T.-B. Team. Terminal-bench: A benchmark for ai agents in terminal environments, Apr 2025

    2025

  28. [36]

    M. Tian, L. Gao, S. Zhang, X. Chen, C. Fan, X. Guo, R. Haas, P. Ji, K. Krongchon, Y . Li, et al. Scicode: A research coding benchmark curated by scientists. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:30624–30650, 2024

    2024

  29. [37]

    Touvron, T

    H. Touvron, T. Lavril, G. Izacard, X. Martinet, M.-A. Lachaux, T. Lacroix, B. Rozière, N. Goyal, E. Hambro, F. Azhar, et al. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  30. [38]

    V odrahalli, S

    K. V odrahalli, S. Ontanon, N. Tripuraneni, K. Xu, S. Jain, R. Shivanna, J. Hui, N. Dikkala, M. Kazemi, B. Fatemi, R. Anil, E. Dyer, S. Shakeri, R. Vij, H. Mehta, V . Ramasesh, Q. Le, E. Chi, Y . Lu, O. Firat, A. Lazaridou, J.-B. Lespiau, N. Attaluri, and K. Olszewska. Michela...

    2024

  31. [39]

    F. Wan, W. Shen, S. Liao, Y . Shi, C. Li, Z. Yang, J. Zhang, F. Huang, J. Zhou, and M. Yan. Qwenlong-l1: Towards long-context large reasoning models with reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.17667, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  32. [40]

    L. Wang, H. Gao, C. Zhao, X. Sun, and D. Dai. Auxiliary-loss-free load balancing strategy for mixture-of-experts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.15664, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    S. Wang, L. Yu, C. Gao, C. Zheng, S. Liu, R. Lu, K. Dang, X. Chen, J. Yang, Z. Zhang, et al. Beyond the 80/20 rule: High-entropy minority tokens drive effective reinforcement learning for llm reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.01939, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  34. [42]

    X. Wang, B. Li, Y . Song, F. F. Xu, X. Tang, M. Zhuge, J. Pan, Y . Song, B. Li, J. Singh, H. H. Tran, F. Li, R. Ma, M. Zheng, B. Qian, Y . Shao, N. Muennighoff, Y . Zhang, B. Hui, J. Lin, R. Brennan, H. Peng, H. Ji, and G. Neubig. Openhands: An open platform for AI software de...

    2025

  35. [43]

    Y . Wang, X. Ma, G. Zhang, Y . Ni, A. Chandra, S. Guo, W. Ren, A. Arulraj, X. He, Z. Jiang, et al. Mmlu-pro: A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:95266–95290, 2024

    2024

  36. [44]

    J. Wei, N. Karina, H. W. Chung, Y . J. Jiao, S. Papay, A. Glaese, J. Schulman, and W. Fedus. Measuring short-form factuality in large language models, 2024

    2024

  37. [45]

    J. Wei, Z. Sun, S. Papay, S. McKinney, J. Han, I. Fulford, H. W. Chung, A. T. Passos, W. Fedus, and A. Glaese. Browsecomp: A simple yet challenging benchmark for browsing agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.12516, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Z. Xi, Y . Ding, W. Chen, B. Hong, H. Guo, J. Wang, D. Yang, C. Liao, X. Guo, W. He, et al. Agentgym: Evolving large language model-based agents across diverse environments. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.04151, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    A. Yang, A. Li, B. Yang, B. Zhang, B. Hui, B. Zheng, B. Yu, C. Gao, C. Huang, C. Lv, et al. Qwen3 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  40. [48]

    S. Yao, N. Shinn, P. Razavi, and K. Narasimhan. tau-bench: A benchmark for tool-agent-user interaction in real-world domains. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.12045, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Q. Yu, Z. Zhang, R. Zhu, Y . Yuan, X. Zuo, Y . Yue, W. Dai, T. Fan, G. Liu, L. Liu, et al. Dapo: An open-source llm reinforcement learning system at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14476, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  42. [50]

    A. Zeng, X. Liu, Z. Du, Z. Wang, H. Lai, M. Ding, Z. Yang, Y . Xu, W. Zheng, X. Xia, et al. Glm-130b: An open bilingual pre-trained model. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations. 25

  43. [51]

    Zhang, L

    Z. Zhang, L. Lei, L. Wu, R. Sun, Y . Huang, C. Long, X. Liu, X. Lei, J. Tang, and M. Huang. Safetybench: Evaluating the safety of large language models with multiple choice questions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.07045, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  44. [52]

    J. Zhou, T. Lu, S. Mishra, S. Brahma, S. Basu, Y . Luan, D. Zhou, and L. Hou. Instruction- following evaluation for large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.07911, 2023. 26

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.