Experimental Realization of the Topologically Nontrivial Phase in Monolayer Si$_2$Te$_2$

Baisheng Sa; Bao-Tian Wang; Lingxiao Zhao; Matthias Bode; Rui Xiong; Wenbin Li; Xiaochun Huang

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 44 references

Experimental Realization of the Topologically Nontrivial Phase in Monolayer Si$_2$Te$_2$

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Monolayer Si2Te2 grown on HfTe2 realizes the quantum spin Hall phase, with a ~300 meV gap and topological edge states.

desk verdict The growth and bulk gap are solid and match DFT, but the topological edge-state claim is supported by indirect STM evidence only; still worth a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.07351 v1 pith:GQMGX25I submitted 2025-08-10 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Xiaochun Huang , Lingxiao Zhao , Rui Xiong , Wenbin Li , Bao-tian Wang , Baisheng Sa , Matthias Bode This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords monolayerSi2Te2quantumspinHallinsulatortopologicaledgestatesHfTe2substratemolecularbeamepitaxyscanningtunnelingmicroscopybandgapZ2invariant

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first experimental realization of the predicted quantum spin Hall phase in a single layer of Si2Te2, a material with no three-dimensional parent. The quantum spin Hall phase is an insulating state whose edges carry conducting channels protected by time-reversal symmetry. By growing the monolayer on HfTe2, the authors obtain a strain-free (1x1) lattice held by van der Waals forces, preserving the spin-orbit band inversion that makes the free-standing layer topologically nontrivial. Scanning tunneling spectroscopy measures a bulk gap of about 300 meV, large enough to matter for room-temperature operation, and finds a sharp, spatially extended edge-state signal at step edges, the expected signature of helical topological channels. If the interpretation holds, the result would make ML-Si2Te2 a practical platform for studying dissipationless edge transport at high temperature.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the ML-Si2Te2/HfTe2 heterostructure: a hexagonal Te-Si-Si-Te monolayer matched to HfTe2 at its natural lattice constant, so the SOC-induced band inversion at $\Gamma$ survives. The argument combines three tools: (i) a substrate-screening criterion based on lattice mismatch and exfoliation energy; (ii) hybrid-functional DFT plus Wannier charge centers to establish a $Z_2=1$ topology; and (iii) STS measurements that locate an in-gap step-edge peak and map its ~2 nm spatial extent.

What would settle it

Measure the two-terminal conductance of a lithographically patterned ML-Si2Te2 channel with the Fermi level inside the ~300 meV gap: a quantum spin Hall insulator must show a quantized $2e^2/h$ edge-conductance plateau that survives local non-magnetic disorder, whereas a trivial edge state would not quantize.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that monolayer Si2Te2 on HfTe2 is a quantum spin Hall insulator. The paper demonstrates this by first screening 4056 two-dimensional materials to select HfTe2 as a substrate whose in-plane lattice matches the free-standing monolayer, then showing with hybrid-functional DFT that the heterostructure retains the band inversion at $\Gamma$ and a $Z_2=1$ invariant. Experimentally, MBE growth produces strain-free (1x1) islands with an in-plane constant of 390 pm; STS resolves a ~300 meV gap consistent with the calculated 319 meV; and dI/dV maps reveal a ~2 nm-wide peak at the Fermi level running continuously along island edges, independent of step geometry. The paper interpret

Load-bearing premise

The interpretation stands on the assumption that the sharp dI/dV peak at island step edges is a topological edge state rather than a trivial edge state from step reconstruction, substrate coupling, or tip effects; the paper does not directly measure spin helicity or quantized edge conductance.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

With a ~300 meV gap, the QSH phase in ML-Si2Te2 should persist at room temperature, in contrast to the meV-scale gaps of HgTe/CdTe and InAs/GaSb quantum wells.
The step-edge states, if helical, would provide dissipationless 1D conduction channels protected against backscattering by time-reversal symmetry.
Growth on HfTe2 makes an exfoliation-inaccessible artificial 2D topological insulator experimentally accessible, and the screening workflow can be reused for other predicted 2D TIs without bulk parents.
Because the phase is strain-sensitive, keeping the monolayer at its free-standing lattice constant is the enabling condition; the observed 390 pm lattice proves this condition is met.
The ~2 nm edge-state width suggests the topological channels can be patterned at the nanometer scale for spintronic or low-power interconnects.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A direct test the authors leave implicit: measuring the edge conductance of a patterned ML-Si2Te2 channel; a quantized $2e^2/h$ plateau would confirm the helical nature that STS alone cannot show.
One might expect the topological edge state to be spin-momentum locked; spin-polarized STM or nonlocal transport measurements are natural next experiments to map the helical texture.
The same substrate-screening logic could be applied to other predicted large-gap 2D TIs, but interface doping or hybridization, seen here as a ~0.25 eV spectral shift, may alter the phase, so screening alone may not guarantee topology.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things up front. The growth is real: the authors get a strain-free 1x1 ML-Si2Te2 on HfTe2, and the measured ~300 meV gap sits close to the HSE06 value of 319 meV. That is solid experimental work and matches the paper's earlier strain screening logic. The second thing is that the topological edge-state claim is not nailed. The stress-test note is right: a zero-bias dI/dV peak at a step edge, with ~2 nm extent and robustness to geometry, does not by itself rule out trivial edge states from reconstruction or substrate coupling. No spin-resolved STS, no edge transport, no comparison with a trivial reference. So "first experimental realization" overstates what is shown; "strong evidence for" would be more accurate.

What is genuinely new: previous work from the same group on Sb2Te3 gave a strained, trivial phase. Here the substrate choice is much better: HfTe2 has a lattice match, vdW interaction, and the DFT predicts the topological phase survives. The calculations are careful—phonons, AIMD, HSE06 gap, Z2 via Wannier charge centers. The experimental lattice constant 390 pm vs 389 pm DFT is exactly what you want. The gap measurement on 20 islands is a nice touch. So the paper is a credible step forward in the materials-by-design program.

Where it gets soft: (1) The edge-state identification is the load-bearing piece. The argument that spatial extent "rules out trivial mechanisms" is too strong—a step reconstruction can be extended and robust. They need either spin-polarized STS, a check against a trivial phase (the Sb2Te3-grown film would be a natural control), or at least an explicit acknowledgment that this is indirect. (2) The DFT uses ML-HfTe2 as the substrate while the experiment is on bulk HfTe2. That could shift the edge-state position relative to EF, so the comparison is not airtight. (3) The 0.25 eV rigid shift in Fig. 4 is a small free parameter; fine if stated, but it weakens the claim of "well captured" for the whole spectrum. (4) The supplementary URL is a placeholder with unrelated text—unacceptable in a submission and should be fixed.

None of these kill the paper; they are the difference between "evidence for" and "realization of." The system is new, and the DFT support is strong enough that a serious referee should see it. I'd send it to peer review with the request that the authors either add the missing control/measurement or soften the language.

For whom: experimentalists working on 2D TIs and anyone interested in substrate screening for topological phases. Worth a reading group if you want to debate evidence standards in STM/STS.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the epitaxial growth of monolayer Si2Te2 on HfTe2 and interprets the system as a quantum spin Hall (QSH) insulator. DFT is used to screen substrates, predict lattice matching, dynamical stability (phonons, AIMD), band topology (HSE06 gap of 319 meV, Z2=1), and edge-state LDOS. STM/STS measurements show a strain-free (1x1) Si2Te2 lattice with a ~300 meV gap and a zero-bias dI/dV peak localized within ~2-3 nm of island step edges, which the authors attribute to topological edge states. The central claim is that this constitutes the first experimental realization of the QSH phase in monolayer Si2Te2.

Significance. If the interpretation is correct, this is a significant milestone: it would demonstrate a predicted room-temperature QSH insulator in an artificial 2D material and validate a material-by-design approach that combines high-throughput substrate screening with MBE growth. The work has clear strengths: the DFT predictions are parameter-free and well matched to experiment (lattice constant 390 pm vs 389 pm; gap ~300 meV vs 319 meV); phonon and AIMD stability calculations support the synthesis; and the edge-state signal is reproducible and spatially extended. The main weakness is that the decisive experimental evidence does not uniquely establish the topological nature of the edge state, and key supporting data are relegated to an inaccessible placeholder reference.

major comments (3)

[Fig. 5 / 'Identification of the edge states'] The central conclusion rests on assigning the zero-bias dI/dV peak at step edges to topological edge states. The evidence offered is the ~2-3 nm spatial extent and the robustness to step geometry. These criteria do not exclude trivial mechanisms such as step-related dangling bonds, reconstruction, or substrate-induced band bending, which can also produce broad and robust edge-localized signals. The manuscript does not provide spin-resolved STS, quantized edge conductance, or a direct comparison with a known trivial phase (e.g., the strained Si2Te2/Sb2Te3 system from Ref. [29]). As written, the abstract's 'first experimental realization of the QSH phase' overstates what the data show. I recommend either adding a discriminating measurement or qualifying the claim to 'evidence for topological edge states' / 'candidate QSH phase.'
[Reference [35] / Supplemental Material] Reference [35] is cited more than a dozen times for critical data: the Z2 Wannier-center calculation, edge-state LDOS, exfoliation energies, AIMD details, dI/dV maps, and the statistics over 20 islands. However, the reference as printed is a placeholder URL (http://link.aps.org/supplemental/XXX) followed by text about 'coexistence of three stripe orientations,' which is unrelated to this manuscript. This makes the supporting data unverifiable and is a blocking issue for review. The supplemental material must be properly provided before the manuscript can be considered.
[Section 2 / Fig. 2] The band-structure calculations, including the 319 meV gap, the Fermi-level position, and the edge-state dispersion, are performed for ML-Si2Te2 on a monolayer HfTe2 substrate, while the experiments use bulk HfTe2. The manuscript does not justify that the ML-HfTe2 model faithfully represents the bulk substrate. The measured gap agreement could be coincidental if the bulk substrate changes the band alignment or doping. Please provide a bulk-slab calculation or an explicit argument for why the monolayer substrate model is equivalent, especially since the paper already invokes a 0.25 eV post-hoc energy shift for substrate doping effects.

minor comments (4)

[Throughout] Typos and grammatical issues: 'V ASP' / 'Viennaab initio' spacing, 'valance' should be 'valence', 'remains challenge' should be 'remains a challenge', 'the exact energy positions ... appear smeared' is awkward. Please copyedit.
[Fig. 4] In Fig. 4(b), the DFT projected DOS is compared to the total DOS of bulk HfTe2, while the band-structure calculations use ML-HfTe2. Clarify which HfTe2 DOS is used and whether bulk vs monolayer affects the comparison.
[Fig. 5] The center-of-island spectrum shows a V-shaped dip with a small in-gap peak attributed to substrate-induced states. This complicates the extraction of the bulk gap; please quantify how the VBM and CBM were determined from the high-resolution spectra and how the substrate states are excluded.
[Reference [39]] The Z2 invariant calculation via Wannier charge centers is cited to Giustino and Pasquarello (2006), which is primarily a phonon method. Please cite the standard references for the Z2 Wannier-center approach (e.g., Soluyanov and Vanderbilt, or Fu and Kane).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the QSH claim rests on parameter-free DFT (HSE06+SOC, Z2 via WCCs) and independent STM/STS measurements; self-citations are background, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The central claim—that ML-Si2Te2 on HfTe2 is a QSH insulator—is supported by (i) parameter-free HSE06+SOC band-structure and Wannier-charge-center Z2 calculations for free-standing and heterostructure ML-Si2Te2, (ii) STM measurements of a strain-free lattice (aexp=390 pm vs aDFT=389 pm), (iii) STS measurement of a ~300 meV gap compared to a DFT-derived gap of 319 meV, and (iv) observation of in-gap step-edge states whose ~2 nm width is compared with a DFT nanoribbon prediction of ~1.35 nm. No parameter needed for the topological classification is fitted to the target data: the 0.25 eV rigid shift used to align the DFT DOS to STS is an energy-origin offset and does not affect the gap size, the Z2 invariant, or the edge-state dispersion. Self-citations ([27]–[30]) supply background (prior synthesis on Sb2Te3, strain-sensitivity criteria) and are independently re-derived or verified by the paper's own HSE06 and Z2 calculations, so they are not load-bearing. The identification of the zero-bias step-edge dI/dV peak as topological is an inference, not a definitional equivalence: the paper explicitly argues against trivial defect states by spatial extent and robustness, citing external Bi(111) results. Whether that inference is strong enough is a correctness/evidence concern, not circularity. One non-circular data-quality flag: Ref. [35] (Supplemental Material) is a placeholder URL ('XXX') with an unrelated description ('large area scans showing the coexistence of three stripe orientations'), so several in-text references to Fig. S1, S3, S6, etc. are currently unverifiable. This undermines verifiability but does not make any derivation circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the predictive accuracy of DFT/HSE06 calculations and on the interpretation of STS features as topological edge states. No new entities (particles, forces, dimensions) are introduced. The strain criterion and the energy shift used to align spectra are the only manually chosen/adjusted numbers; neither is used to produce the predicted gap of ~319 meV or the Z2=1 invariant.

free parameters (2)

DFT-to-experiment energy shift = ~0.25 eV
Used to align calculated DOS peaks with experimental dI/dV spectra (Fig. 4); attributed to substrate-induced doping not captured by DFT. Does not affect the gap or topology.
Strain tolerance range for substrate screening = -3.5% to 2.5%
A manually chosen filter based on prior work (Ref. 29) to preserve the topological phase. Not fitted to the current data but a selection criterion.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption DFT/HSE06 with vdW corrections accurately predicts the electronic structure and topology (Z2=1) of ML-Si2Te2/HfTe2.
Invoked in the band structure and Z2 sections (Fig. 2 and text) to interpret the measured gap and edge states as topological.
ad hoc to paper The observed dI/dV peak at step edges is a topological edge state, not a trivial state.
The paper uses spatial extent (~2 nm) and robustness to exclude trivial mechanisms, but does not directly measure helicity or conductance quantization. This is central to the claim of topological nature.
standard math Standard DFT functionals (PBE and HSE06) and phonon/AIMD calculations are appropriate for structural stability and band structure.
Background methodology; standard in computational materials science.
domain assumption The screening using lattice mismatch (within -3.5% to 2.5%) and exfoliation energy identifies a suitable substrate for strain-free growth.
It assumes the computational screening criteria capture the real growth conditions.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Experimental Realization of the Topologically Nontrivial Phase in Monolayer Si$_2$Te$_2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GQMGX25I

@misc{pith2026250807351,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Experimental Realization of the Topologically Nontrivial Phase in Monolayer Si$_2$Te$_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GQMGX25I}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.07351}
}

abstract

The free-standing monolayer Si$_2$Te$_2$ (ML-Si$_2$Te$_2$) has been theoretically predicted to host a room-temperature quantum spin Hall phase. However, its experimental realization remains challenge due to the absence of a three-dimensional counterpart. Here, we demonstrate that HfTe$_2$ serves as an ideal substrate for the epitaxial growth of ML-Si$_2$Te$_2$, preserving its topological phase. Scanning tunneling microscopy and spectroscopy confirm a strain-free ${(1 \times 1)}$ lattice of ML-Si$_2$Te$_2$, along with a sizable band gap, which is well captured by first-principles calculations. Moreover, distinct edge states, independent of step geometry and exhibiting a broad spatial distribution, are observed at ML-Si$_2$Te$_2$ step edges, underscoring its topological nature.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

[29]

Huang, R

X. Huang, R. Xiong, K. Volckaert, C. Hao, D. Biswas, M. Bianchi, P. Hofmann, P. Beck, J. Warmuth, B. Sa, J. Wiebe, and R. Wiesendanger, Experimental realiza- tion of semiconducting monolayer Si2Te2 films, Advanced Functional Materials 32, 2208281 (2022)

work page 2022
[35]

See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/XXX for detailed information regarding image processing procedures and large area scans showing the coexistence of three stripe orientations

work page
[1]

C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Z2 topological order and the quantum spin Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 146802 (2005)

work page 2005
[2]

B. A. Bernevig and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum spin Hall ef- fect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 106802 (2006)

2006
[3]

Qi and S.-C

X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and su- perconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011)

2011
[4]

M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010)

2010
[5]

B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum spin Hall effect and topological phase transition in HgTe quantum wells, Science 314, 1757 (2006)

2006
[6]

K¨ onig, S

M. K¨ onig, S. Wiedmann, C. Br¨ une, A. Roth, H. Buh- mann, L. W. Molenkamp, X.-L. Qi, and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum spin Hall insulator state in HgTe quantum wells, Science 318, 766 (2007)

2007

Show all 44 references

[7]

Knez, R.-R

I. Knez, R.-R. Du, and G. Sullivan, Evidence for helical edge modes in inverted InAs/GaSb quantum wells, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 136603 (2011)

2011
[8]

Y. Ren, Z. Qiao, and Q. Niu, Topological phases in two- dimensional materials: a review, Reports on Progress in Physics 79, 066501 (2016)

2016
[9]

X. Qian, J. Liu, L. Fu, and J. Li, Quantum spin Hall ef- fect in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides, Science 346, 1344 (2014)

2014
[10]

Zhang, X

X. Zhang, X. Wang, T. He, L. Wang, W.-W. Yu, Y. Liu, G. Liu, and Z. Cheng, Magnetic topological materials in two-dimensional: theory, material realization and appli- cation prospects, Science Bulletin 68, 2639 (2023)

2023
[11]

S. Wu, V. Fatemi, Q. D. Gibson, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. J. Cava, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Obser- vation of the quantum spin Hall effect up to 100 kelvin in a monolayer crystal, Science 359, 76 (2018)

2018
[12]

S. Tang, C. Zhang, D. Wong, Z. Pedramrazi, H.-Z. Tsai, C. Jia, B. Moritz, M. Claassen, H. Ryu, S. Kahn, J. Jiang, H. Yan, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, R. G. Moore, C.-C. Hwang, C. Hwang, Z. Hussain, Y. Chen, M. M. Ugeda, Z. Liu, X. Xie, T. P. Devereaux, M. F. Crommie, S.-K. Mo, and Z....

2017
[13]

C. Zhao, M. Hu, J. Qin, B. Xia, C. Liu, S. Wang, D. Guan, Y. Li, H. Zheng, J. Liu, and J. Jia, Strain tun- able semimetal–topological-insulator transition in mono- layer 1T’-WTe2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 046801 (2020)

2020
[14]

H. Weng, X. Dai, and Z. Fang, Transition-metal pen- tatelluride ZrTe5 and HfTe5: A paradigm for large-gap quantum spin Hall insulators, Phys. Rev. X 4, 011002 (2014)

2014
[15]

Li, W.-K

X.-B. Li, W.-K. Huang, Y.-Y. Lv, K.-W. Zhang, C.-L. Yang, B.-B. Zhang, Y. B. Chen, S.-H. Yao, J. Zhou, M.- H. Lu, L. Sheng, S.-C. Li, J.-F. Jia, Q.-K. Xue, Y.-F. Chen, and D.-Y. Xing, Experimental observation of topo- logical edge states at the surface step edge of the topolog...

2016
[16]

J.-J. Zhou, W. Feng, C.-C. Liu, S. Guan, and Y. Yao, Large-gap quantum spin Hall insulator in single layer bis- muth monobromide Bi4Br4, Nano Lett. 14, 4767 (2014)

2014
[17]

Shumiya, M

N. Shumiya, M. S. Hossain, J.-X. Yin, Z. Wang, M. Litskevich, C. Yoon, Y. Li, Y. Yang, Y.-X. Jiang, G. Cheng, Y.-C. Lin, Q. Zhang, Z.-J. Cheng, T. A. Cochran, D. Multer, X. P. Yang, B. Casas, T.-R. Chang, T. Neupert, Z. Yuan, S. Jia, H. Lin, N. Yao, L. Bali- cas, F. Zhang, Y. ...

2022
[18]

C.-C. Liu, W. Feng, and Y. Yao, Quantum spin Hall effect in silicene and two-dimensional germanium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 076802 (2011)

2011
[19]

Bampoulis, C

P. Bampoulis, C. Castenmiller, D. J. Klaassen, J. van Mil, Y. Liu, C.-C. Liu, Y. Yao, M. Ezawa, A. N. Rudenko, and H. J. W. Zandvliet, Quantum spin Hall states and topological phase transition in germanene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 196401 (2023)

2023
[20]

Zhu, W.-J

F.-F. Zhu, W.-J. Chen, Y. Xu, C.-L. Gao, D.-D. Guan, C.-H. Liu, D. Qian, S.-C. Zhang, and J.-F. Jia, Epitaxial growth of two-dimensional stanene, Nature Materials 14, 1020 (2015)

2015
[21]

J. Deng, B. Xia, X. Ma, H. Chen, H. Shan, X. Zhai, B. Li, A. Zhao, Y. Xu, W. Duan, S.-C. Zhang, B. Wang, and J. G. Hou, Epitaxial growth of ultraflat stanene with topological band inversion, Nature Materials 17, 1081 (2018)

2018
[22]

F. Yang, L. Miao, Z. F. Wang, M.-Y. Yao, F. Zhu, Y. R. Song, M.-X. Wang, J.-P. Xu, A. V. Fedorov, Z. Sun, G. B. Zhang, C. Liu, F. Liu, D. Qian, C. L. Gao, and J.-F. Jia, Spatial and energy distribution of topological edge states in single Bi(111) bilayer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109,...

2012
[23]

F. Reis, G. Li, L. Dudy, M. Bauernfeind, S. Glass, W. Hanke, R. Thomale, J. Sch¨ afer, and R. Claessen, Bis- muthene on a SiC substrate: A candidate for a high- temperature quantum spin Hall material, Science 357, 287 (2017). 6

2017
[24]

J. Gou, L. Kong, X. He, Y. L. Huang, J. Sun, S. Meng, K. Wu, L. Chen, and A. T. S. Wee, The effect of moir´ e superstructures on topological edge states in twisted bis- muthene homojunctions, Science Advances 6, eaba2773 (2020)

2020
[25]

N. R. Glavin, R. Rao, V. Varshney, E. Bianco, A. Apte, A. Roy, E. Ringe, and P. M. Ajayan, Emerging applica- tions of elemental 2D materials, Advanced Materials 32, 1904302 (2020)

2020
[26]

Hoffmann, Small but strong lessons from chemistry for nanoscience, Angewandte Chemie Int

R. Hoffmann, Small but strong lessons from chemistry for nanoscience, Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed. 52, 93 (2013)

2013
[27]

Y. Ma, L. Kou, Y. Dai, and T. Heine, Proposed two- dimensional topological insulator in SiTe, Phys. Rev. B 94, 201104 (2016)

2016
[28]

B. Sa, Z. Sun, and B. Wu, The development of two dimen- sional group iv chalcogenides, blocks for van der waals heterostructures, Nanoscale 8, 1169 (2016)

2016
[30]

Huang, R

X. Huang, R. Xiong, C. Hao, P. Beck, B. Sa, J. Wiebe, and R. Wiesendanger, 2D lateral heterojunction arrays with tailored interface band bending, Advanced Materi- als 36, 2308007 (2024)

2024
[31]

Haastrup, M

S. Haastrup, M. Strange, M. Pandey, T. Deilmann, P. S. Schmidt, N. F. Hinsche, M. N. Gjerding, D. Torelli, P. M. Larsen, and A. C. Riis-Jensen, The computational 2D materials database: high-throughput modeling and dis- covery of atomically thin crystals, 2D Materials5, 042002 (2018)

2018
[32]

M. N. Gjerding, A. Taghizadeh, A. Rasmussen, S. Ali, F. Bertoldo, T. Deilmann, N. R. Knøsgaard, M. Kruse, A. H. Larsen, and S. Manti, Recent progress of the com- putational 2D materials database (C2DB), 2D Materials 8, 044002 (2021)

2021
[33]

Y. S. Oh, J. J. Yang, Y. Horibe, and S.-W. Cheong, Anionic depolymerization transition in IrTe2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 127209 (2013)

2013
[34]

L. Kang, C. Ye, X. Zhao, X. Zhou, J. Hu, Q. Li, D. Liu, C. M. Das, J. Yang, D. Hu, J. Chen, X. Cao, Y. Zhang, M. Xu, J. Di, D. Tian, P. Song, G. Kutty, Q. Zeng, Q. Fu, Y. Deng, J. Zhou, A. Ariando, F. Miao, G. Hong, Y. Huang, S. J. Pennycook, K.-T. Yong, W. Ji, X. Ren- shaw Wa...

2020
[36]

Hafner, Ab-initio simulations of materials using V ASP: Density-functional theory and beyond, Journal of Com- putational Chemistry 29, 2044 (2008)

J. Hafner, Ab-initio simulations of materials using V ASP: Density-functional theory and beyond, Journal of Com- putational Chemistry 29, 2044 (2008)
[37]

W. G. Hoover, Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase- space distributions, Phys. Rev. A 31, 1695 (1985)

1985
[38]

J. Heyd, G. E. Scuseria, and M. Ernzerhof, Hybrid func- tionals based on a screened Coulomb potential, The Jour- nal of Chemical Physics 118, 8207 (2003)

2003
[39]

Giustino and A

F. Giustino and A. Pasquarello, Mixed Wannier-Bloch functions for electrons and phonons in periodic systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 216403 (2006)

2006
[40]

Huang, J

X. Huang, J. Guan, Z. Lin, B. Liu, S. Xing, W. Wang, and J. Guo, Epitaxial growth and band structure of Te film on graphene, Nano Lett. 17, 4619 (2017)

2017
[41]

I. K. Drozdov, A. Alexandradinata, S. Jeon, S. Nadj- Perge, H. Ji, R. J. Cava, B. Andrei Bernevig, and A. Yaz- dani, One-dimensional topological edge states of bismuth bilayers, Nature Physics 10, 664 (2014)

2014
[42]

Pauly, B

C. Pauly, B. Rasche, K. Koepernik, M. Liebmann, M. Pratzer, M. Richter, J. Kellner, M. Eschbach, B. Kaufmann, L. Plucinski, C. M. Schneider, M. Ruck, J. van den Brink, and M. Morgenstern, Subnanometre- wide electron channels protected by topology, Nature Physics 11, 338 (2015)

2015
[43]

C. Zhao, L. Li, L. Zhang, J. Qin, H. Chen, B. Xia, B. Yang, H. Zheng, S. Wang, C. Liu, Y. Li, D. Guan, P. Cui, Z. Zhang, and J. Jia, Coexistence of robust edge states and superconductivity in few-layer stanene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 206802 (2022)

2022
[44]

Sessi, D

P. Sessi, D. D. Sante, A. Szczerbakow, F. Glott, S. Wil- fert, H. Schmidt, T. Bathon, P. Dziawa, M. Greiter, T. Neupert, G. Sangiovanni, T. Story, R. Thomale, and M. Bode, Robust spin-polarized midgap states at step edges of topological crystalline insulators, Science 354, 1269 (2016)

2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [29]

Huang, R

X. Huang, R. Xiong, K. Volckaert, C. Hao, D. Biswas, M. Bianchi, P. Hofmann, P. Beck, J. Warmuth, B. Sa, J. Wiebe, and R. Wiesendanger, Experimental realiza- tion of semiconducting monolayer Si2Te2 films, Advanced Functional Materials 32, 2208281 (2022)

work page 2022

[2] [35]

See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/XXX for detailed information regarding image processing procedures and large area scans showing the coexistence of three stripe orientations

work page

[3] [1]

C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Z2 topological order and the quantum spin Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 146802 (2005)

work page 2005

[4] [2]

B. A. Bernevig and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum spin Hall ef- fect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 106802 (2006)

2006

[5] [3]

Qi and S.-C

X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and su- perconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011)

2011

[6] [4]

M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010)

2010

[7] [5]

B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum spin Hall effect and topological phase transition in HgTe quantum wells, Science 314, 1757 (2006)

2006

[8] [6]

K¨ onig, S

M. K¨ onig, S. Wiedmann, C. Br¨ une, A. Roth, H. Buh- mann, L. W. Molenkamp, X.-L. Qi, and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum spin Hall insulator state in HgTe quantum wells, Science 318, 766 (2007)

2007