Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 5 cited by

CharacterShot: Controllable and Consistent 4D Character Animation

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read CharacterShot claims that a single reference character image and a 2D pose sequence, run through a pose-conditioned diffusion transformer and a neighbor-constrained 4D Gaussian-splat reconstruction, can yield a controllable, view-consistent

desk verdict Solid systems paper with a genuinely new task setting, but the headline consistency numbers are measured against the model's own outputs, so the SOTA claim is not yet earned. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.07409 v1 pith:LQ5FONPB submitted 2025-08-10 cs.CV

Junyao Gao , Jiaxing Li , Wenran Liu , Yanhong Zeng , Fei Shen , Kai Chen , Yanan Sun , Cairong Zhao This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords 4Dcharacteranimationpose-guideddiffusiontransformermulti-viewvideogenerationGaussiansplattingsingle-imagetemporalconsistencydataset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

CharacterShot sets out to prove that a moving, viewable-from-any-angle 3D character—a 4D character animation—can be produced from a single reference character image and a 2D pose sequence, without modeling, rigging, or motion capture. The paper's approach is to make a diffusion-transformer image-to-video generator pose-controllable, extend it to generate multiple synchronized viewpoints with a dual-attention module and camera conditioning, and then reconstruct a temporally stable 4D Gaussian-splat representation from those videos. The payoff, if the claims hold, is that character animation drops from a weeks-long CGI pipeline to roughly an hour of GPU computation that an individual creator can run. To support this, the authors introduce a 13,115-character training set and a benchmark, CharacterBench, and report consistent gains over prior methods on multi-view and 4D quality metrics.

What carries the argument

The dual-attention module: it processes video tokens in two arrangements at once—frames grouped within each view and views grouped within each frame—using parallel full-attention blocks, so spatial-temporal and spatial-view coherence are learned jointly rather than through separate attention mechanisms. The other load-bearing piece is neighbor-constrained 4D Gaussian splatting (4DGS): a coarse-to-fine optimization of deformable 3D Gaussians over time, where a neighbor loss compares each point's displacement from its local group center between consecutive frames and is activated by a binary gate only when a point moves beyond a threshold. That gate stops noisy outlier points from dragging loc

What would settle it

Run CharacterShot on a character from Character4D whose true 3D mesh and motion are known, then render the optimized 4D Gaussians at a held-out camera viewpoint and time that were not used in the multi-view video set, and measure image distance against a rendering of the true mesh. If the held-out novel-view error is close to the reported training-view numbers, the consistency is real; if it degrades sharply, the consistency was an artifact of optimizing against self-generated videos.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

CharacterShot's central claim is that a dynamic 3D character can be generated directly from one reference image and a 2D pose sequence, bypassing the usual CGI chain of modeling, rigging, and motion capture. The paper builds this around a diffusion-transformer video model that is made pose-controllable in a pretraining stage, then extended to generate several synchronized viewpoints through a dual-attention module and a camera prior. The multi-view videos are lifted into a 4D representation by a coarse-to-fine Gaussian-splatting optimization with a neighbor constraint designed to suppress view-to-view outliers. With these pieces, the authors report that CharacterShot preserves the character'

Load-bearing premise

Everything in the final 4D result is only as trustworthy as the multi-view videos produced earlier, and the paper's own benchmark treats those generated videos as the ground truth for the 4D stage, so errors introduced by the generator can become permanent without being measured.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Pose-controlled 4D animation becomes accessible to non-specialists: the reported pipeline takes 20–40 minutes for multi-view video generation plus about 30 minutes for 4D optimization on one H800 GPU, and needs only a character image and a skeleton sequence as input.
  • Any existing 2D pose data—from dance videos, motion libraries, or manual keyframing—can be retargeted onto arbitrary characters, since the motion signal is just a 2D pose sequence.
  • Because the dual-attention module learns spatial-temporal and spatial-view consistency jointly, the same animated character can be rendered from arbitrary viewpoints without per-view training.
  • The neighbor constraint specifically targets artifacts like disappearing hands and outlier 3D points, which earlier 4D-Gaussian methods exhibit when optimized on generated multi-view videos.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not state this, but if the multi-view generator produces systematic artifacts, the 4D benchmark's pseudo-ground-truth comparison will hide them; an evaluation on independent 3D scans or held-out rendered views is the natural next check.
  • The paper does not state this, but the pose-conditioned 2D animator is a standalone product: it can animate any character image with any pose sequence even if the 4D reconstruction stage is never run.
  • The paper does not state this, but the same pipeline could be driven by real-time skeleton tracking to make an animatable avatar, provided the generation latency drops from tens of minutes to near-interactive speeds.
  • The paper does not state this, but the out-of-distribution generalization claim is primarily perceptual rather than geometric, because the benchmark mixes in-house rendered characters with internet and model-generated images rated by 30 human volunteers.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes CharacterShot, a framework for 4D character animation from a single reference character image and a 2D pose sequence. The method consists of three stages: (i) fine-tuning the DiT-based image-to-video model CogVideoX with pose conditioning to obtain a 2D character animation model; (ii) extending it to multi-view video generation via a dual-attention module and camera priors, with a separately fine-tuned SV3D view generator; and (iii) optimizing a neighbor-constrained 4D Gaussian Splatting representation from the generated multi-view videos. The authors also introduce Character4D, a large dataset of 13,115 VRoidHub characters with rigged motions and multi-view renders, and CharacterBench, a benchmark built from this dataset plus out-of-distribution characters. Quantitative comparisons on CharacterBench claim consistent SOTA improvements over SV3D, SV4D, Diffusion2, STAG4D, SC4D, L4GM, and DG4D across SSIM, LPIPS, CLIP-S, FVD variants, and FV4D. The paper includes ablations of the dual-attention module, the neighbor-constrained 4DGS, and the dataset contribution, plus a 30-participant user study for out-of-Character4D characters.

Significance. If the claims hold, CharacterShot would be a practically valuable system: it turns a single character image and a pose sequence into a view-consistent, temporally coherent 4D representation in tens of minutes without hand modeling or motion capture. The proposed large-scale character dataset and benchmark could also be useful resources for the community. The dual-attention design is a reasonable and potentially effective way to couple spatial-temporal and spatial-view information, and the neighbor constraint for 4DGS is a sensible robustness measure. However, the current evidence for the central claim of 3D/4D consistency is weakened by a substantial evaluation-circularity issue: the 4D optimization stage is evaluated against the same generated multi-view videos that supervise it, and all quantitative comparisons lack error bars or significance tests. These are fixable through additional evaluation against independent 3D ground truth and proper statistical reporting, so the paper's core idea is not invalidated, but the strength of the empirical claims is currently disproportionate to the evidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [Table 4, Sec. 3.4/4.3] The only quantitative evaluation of the 4D optimization stage uses pseudo ground truth: Table 4's caption states 'Ground truths are generated multi-view videos.' Because these same generated videos are the supervision for the 4DGS optimization and the reference for SSIM/LPIPS/FVD-F/FV4D, the metrics largely measure how well the 4D representation reproduces the generator's own outputs, not true 3D consistency. Cross-view inconsistencies in the generator could be absorbed by the 4D representation as blur or floaters while still scoring high against the same pseudo-GT. Please evaluate the 4D stage against independent 3D ground truth from the Character4D test set (e.g., held-out characters with ground-truth multi-view renders, and optionally mesh/geometry metrics such as Chamfer distance or normal consistency), or at minimum report per-sample metrics that separate view-consistency from frame
  2. [Table 2 and Table 7, Sec. 4.2/B.2] The end-to-end comparison in Table 2 is confounded by the input presented to each baseline: SV4D, Diffusion2, STAG4D, SC4D, L4GM, and DG4D are driven by single-view videos generated by a separately fine-tuned MimicMotion, while CharacterShot receives the reference image and pose sequence. Table 7 confirms that L4GM's performance is sensitive to input video quality (SSIM 0.904 with original, 0.907 with fine-tuned, 0.916 with ground-truth single-view video). This shows that a non-trivial part of the observed margin may reflect the quality of the generated single-view input rather than the proposed 4D representation. Please provide an ablation that gives the baselines access to ground-truth single-view videos (or otherwise controls for input quality) and report the comparison in that condition, alongside the current setup.
  3. [Tables 1-8, Sec. 4] No error bars, confidence intervals, or significance tests are reported for any quantitative result. While the reported margins are large, the absence of any statistical characterization makes it impossible to assess stability across test samples, especially given that the benchmark is constructed by the authors from their own dataset. Please report standard deviations or confidence intervals over CharacterBench samples, and where feasible run a paired significance test (e.g., Wilcoxon signed-rank) for the primary comparisons. This is particularly important for the 4D optimization comparison in Table 4, where the pseudo-GT setup already narrows the gap between methods.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (4)-(6), Sec. 3.4] The neighbor loss uses the symbol u_t_i, but u is not defined before its use. Please define it (presumably the position of Gaussian i at time t) and clarify the dimension of L_t_i.
  2. [Sec. 3.5] There is a typo: 'Objverse' should be 'Objaverse' in Section 2.2 context; the reference [8] is Objaverse. Also, 'followed [84]' in Sec. 3.4 should be 'following [84]'.
  3. [Fig. 8] The caption says 'G-Mesh' but the text and references use 'DG-Mesh'. Please make the naming consistent.
  4. [Abstract & Sec. 1] Minor typo: 'sequnce' should be 'sequence' in the abstract. Also, the claim 'first DiT-based 4D character animation framework' should be checked against Human4DiT (cited as [57]), which is also DiT-based and handles 4D human generation; the distinction should be stated clearly (e.g., 'from a single reference image and 2D pose sequence') to avoid overclaiming.
  5. [Appendix B.3, Table 8] The user study uses 30 volunteers, which is small. Please report the exact question format, the standard deviation across participants, and whether the differences are statistically significant. Also, a breakdown by character type (anime vs. real vs. AI-generated) would strengthen the out-of-distribution generalization claim.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The 4D consistency evaluation in Table 4 is a closed loop against the authors' own generated multi-view videos, but the main end-to-end comparison and OOC user study provide independent evidence, so circularity is partial.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 4.3, Table 4 (4DGS Optimization)]
    "In the fine stage, we utilize a 4D progressive fitting [84] to gradually refine the deformable Gaussians at time t with the grid-based total variation loss LTV [84] and image-space reconstruction losses L1 and LLPIPS from the entire multi-view videos. ... For a fair comparison, we optimize the 4D representations of these methods using our generated multi-view videos (as pseudo ground truth). ... Table 4. Quantitative comparison of 4D optimization on CharacterBench. Ground truths are generated multi-view videos."

    The 4DGS stage is optimized with L1 and LPIPS reconstruction losses against the multi-view videos produced by the authors' own generator (Sec. 3.4). Table 4 then reports SSIM, LPIPS, FVD-F, and FV4D between renders of the optimized 4D representation and those same generated videos, explicitly labeling them 'ground truths.' The evaluation reference is therefore the training target itself: the scores primarily measure how faithfully the 4D representation fits the generator's pseudo-GT views, not whether those views are geometrically consistent or whether the 4D result is correct in any independent 3D sense. Inconsistencies in the generator can be absorbed by the 4DGS as blur or floaters without being penalized, so this table cannot validate the paper's central spatial-view consistency claim.

full rationale

The paper's method is a learned pipeline built on external pretrained components (CogVideoX, SV3D, SV4D-style modules), so there is no derivation-level circularity in the architecture itself. The self-citations to prior work by overlapping authors (e.g., HumanVid [75] for dataset curation) are used as pipeline building blocks, not as the sole justification of a contested claim. The main end-to-end comparison in Table 2 and the out-of-Character4D user study (Table 8) provide independent evidence for the headline capability, and Table 7 actually examines input-quality effects rather than hiding them. The most significant circular element is Table 4, where the 4D optimization is both fitted to and evaluated against the authors' own generated multi-view videos, with those videos explicitly called 'ground truths.' This makes the 4D-consistency ablation partially self-referential: it validates reconstruction fidelity to a pseudo-GT that may itself contain view inconsistencies. Because the central end-to-end claim retains independent support, the circularity is partial rather than total, giving a score of 4.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities or mathematical structures are introduced. The paper's dependencies are entirely engineering assumptions about pretrained models, pose estimation, and the representativeness of its synthetic dataset.

free parameters (3)
  • Fine-stage loss weights lambda_1, lambda_2, lambda_3, lambda_4 = 1, 0.01, 1, 1
    Manually chosen for the neighbor-constrained 4DGS objective (Sec. 3.4, App. A); no sensitivity analysis is reported.
  • Neighbor displacement threshold tau = not reported
    Defined in Sec. 3.4 as a predefined threshold for outlier activation in the neighbor loss, but its value is never given, which is a reproducibility gap.
  • Neighborhood size |N(i)| = 20
    Chosen in App. A for the neighbor loss; no ablation on neighborhood size is provided.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption CogVideoX-I2V-5B provides a strong and adaptable video prior.
    The entire pipeline fine-tunes this base model; if the base model's image-to-video quality is insufficient, the pose-conditioned stage inherits its failures (Sec. 3.1, 3.2).
  • domain assumption SV3D provides a controllable camera prior and multi-view synthesis base.
    Used for camera Plücker embeddings and as the view generator to fine-tune; its camera parameterization and generated views are assumed reliable for characters (Sec. 3.3).
  • domain assumption DWpose pose estimation is reliable for diverse characters.
    Pose images in training and inference come from DWpose; failure would misalign the conditioning signal and degrade the generated motion (Sec. 4.1, App. A).
  • domain assumption VRoidHub characters plus Mixamo motions represent the target distribution of any character and motion.
    Training data is synthetic anime-style avatars; the paper assumes this generalizes to internet, Flux, and real human characters, supported only by a small user study (Sec. 3.5, B.3).
  • domain assumption Synthetic multi-view renderings are valid supervision for 4DGS optimization.
    The 4D representation is optimized and evaluated against rendered or generated multi-view videos, not captured 3D scans (Sec. 3.4, Table 4).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of CharacterShot: Controllable and Consistent 4D Character Animation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LQ5FONPB

@misc{pith2026250807409,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: CharacterShot: Controllable and Consistent 4D Character Animation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LQ5FONPB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.07409}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we propose \textbf{CharacterShot}, a controllable and consistent 4D character animation framework that enables any individual designer to create dynamic 3D characters (i.e., 4D character animation) from a single reference character image and a 2D pose sequence. We begin by pretraining a powerful 2D character animation model based on a cutting-edge DiT-based image-to-video model, which allows for any 2D pose sequnce as controllable signal. We then lift the animation model from 2D to 3D through introducing dual-attention module together with camera prior to generate multi-view videos with spatial-temporal and spatial-view consistency. Finally, we employ a novel neighbor-constrained 4D gaussian splatting optimization on these multi-view videos, resulting in continuous and stable 4D character representations. Moreover, to improve character-centric performance, we construct a large-scale dataset Character4D, containing 13,115 unique characters with diverse appearances and motions, rendered from multiple viewpoints. Extensive experiments on our newly constructed benchmark, CharacterBench, demonstrate that our approach outperforms current state-of-the-art methods. Code, models, and datasets will be publicly available at https://github.com/Jeoyal/CharacterShot.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.07409 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Given any character image and a 2D pose sequence, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of CharacterShot. Given a reference character image and a 2D pose sequence as custom motion input, our framework generates multi-view [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The separated spatial, temporal and view attention mechanisms are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Visual comparison of multi-view videos synthesis. CharacterShot generates high-quality character videos with both spatial-temporal and multi-view [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Visualization from the baseline to variants incorporating different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Visual comparison of 4D generation. CharacterShot outperforms other methods in terms of texture and detail. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Visual comparison of 3D multi-view image synthesis. Fine-tuning SV3D on the Character4D dataset, our view generator generates novel character [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Visual comparison of 4D optimization. “Pseudo GT” refers to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: A character sample from our Character4D dataset shown across four [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Visual results of multi-view videos generation for characters from Flux and Internet, which are out-of-Character4D. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. UMI3D: Robust 3D Generation on Unconstrained Multi-Image Inputs via Simultaneous Focus Cross-Attention Routing

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Routing each 3D voxel to its most informative conditioning image via a model-intrinsic Voxel Reference Score unlocks robust unconstrained multi-image 3D generation without retraining.

  2. Follow Your Track: Precise Skeleton Animation Controlled by 3D Trajectories

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    ACT is a trajectory-conditioned framework for topology-general skeletal animation that injects 3D point trajectories from monocular video into skeletons via a Routed Trajectory Injector for improved fidelity and tempo...

  3. Controllable Dynamic 3D Shape Generation via 3D Trajectories and Text

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    T2Mo generates controllable dynamic 3D shapes by conditioning on both text semantics and 3D trajectories with a shape-grounded embedding for arbitrary inputs.

  4. DistillAlign: Coordinating Mode Covering and Mode Seeking in Autoregressive Video Distillation

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Matching init-to-DMD mode coverage and jointly training DMD with consistency distillation improves AR video distillation quality, coverage, and diversity enough that a 1.3B teacher can beat 14B baselines.

  5. MegaStyle: Constructing Diverse and Scalable Style Dataset via Consistent Text-to-Image Style Mapping

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    A scalable pipeline generates an intra-consistent, inter-diverse 1.4M style image dataset from text-to-image models and uses it to train a style encoder and generalizable style transfer model.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    [n. d.]. Mixamo. https://www.mixamo.com

  2. [2]

    [n. d.]. rokoko. https://www.rokoko.com/

  3. [3]

    Sherwin Bahmani, Ivan Skorokhodov, Victor Rong, Gordon Wetzstein, Leonidas Guibas, Peter Wonka, Sergey Tulyakov, Jeong Joon Park, Andrea Tagliasacchi, and David B Lindell. 2024. 4d-fy: Text-to-4d generation using hybrid score distillation sampling. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition . 7996–8006

    2024

  4. [4]

    Caroline Chan, Shiry Ginosar, Tinghui Zhou, and Alexei A Efros. 2019. Ev- erybody dance now. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. 5933–5942

    2019

  5. [5]

    Shuhong Chen, Kevin Zhang, Yichun Shi, Heng Wang, Yiheng Zhu, Guoxian Song, Sizhe An, Janus Kristjansson, Xiao Yang, and Matthias Zwicker. 2023. Panic-3d: Stylized single-view 3d reconstruction from portraits of anime charac- ters. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 21068–21077

    2023

  6. [6]

    Zilong Chen, Feng Wang, Yikai Wang, and Huaping Liu. 2024. Text-to-3d using gaussian splatting. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 21401–21412

    2024

  7. [7]

    Wei Cheng, Ruixiang Chen, Siming Fan, Wanqi Yin, Keyu Chen, Zhongang Cai, Jingbo Wang, Yang Gao, Zhengming Yu, Zhengyu Lin, et al . 2023. Dna- rendering: A diverse neural actor repository for high-fidelity human-centric rendering. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 19982–19993

    2023

  8. [8]

    Matt Deitke, Dustin Schwenk, Jordi Salvador, Luca Weihs, Oscar Michel, Eli Van- derBilt, Ludwig Schmidt, Kiana Ehsani, Aniruddha Kembhavi, and Ali Farhadi

Show all 114 references
  1. [9]

    Mengyang Feng, Jinlin Liu, Kai Yu, Yuan Yao, Zheng Hui, Xiefan Guo, Xianhui Lin, Haolan Xue, Chen Shi, Xiaowen Li, et al . 2023. Dreamoving: A human video generation framework based on diffusion models. arXiv e-prints (2023), arXiv–2312

    2023

  2. [10]

    Qijun Gan, Yi Ren, Chen Zhang, Zhenhui Ye, Pan Xie, Xiang Yin, Zehuan Yuan, Bingyue Peng, and Jianke Zhu. 2025. HumanDiT: Pose-Guided Diffusion Transformer for Long-form Human Motion Video Generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.04847 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Junyao Gao, Yanchen Liu, Yanan Sun, Yinhao Tang, Yanhong Zeng, Kai Chen, and Cairong Zhao. 2024. Styleshot: A snapshot on any style. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.01414 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Junyao Gao, Yanan Sun, Fei Shen, Xin Jiang, Zhening Xing, Kai Chen, and Cairong Zhao. 2025. Faceshot: Bring any character into life. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.00740 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Pengsheng Guo, Hans Hao, Adam Caccavale, Zhongzheng Ren, Edward Zhang, Qi Shan, Aditya Sankar, Alexander G Schwing, Alex Colburn, and Fangchang Ma

  6. [14]

    Hao He, Yinghao Xu, Yuwei Guo, Gordon Wetzstein, Bo Dai, Hongsheng Li, and Ceyuan Yang. [n. d.]. CameraCtrl: Enabling Camera Control for Video Diffusion Models. In The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations

  7. [15]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.02189 (2023)

    StableDreamer: Taming Noisy Score Distillation Sampling for Text-to-3D. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.02189 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. 2020. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in neural information processing systems 33 (2020), 6840–6851

    2020

  9. [17]

    Martin Heusel, Hubert Ramsauer, Thomas Unterthiner, Bernhard Nessler, and Sepp Hochreiter. 2017. Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017)

    2017

  10. [18]

    Li Hu. 2024. Animate anyone: Consistent and controllable image-to-video synthesis for character animation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition . 8153–8163

    2024

  11. [19]

    Yicong Hong, Kai Zhang, Jiuxiang Gu, Sai Bi, Yang Zhou, Difan Liu, Feng Liu, Kalyan Sunkavalli, Trung Bui, and Hao Tan. 2023. Lrm: Large reconstruction model for single image to 3d. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.04400 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Hanwen Jiang, Zhenyu Jiang, Yue Zhao, and Qixing Huang. 2023. Leap: Liberate sparse-view 3d modeling from camera poses. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.01410 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Liangxiao Hu, Hongwen Zhang, Yuxiang Zhang, Boyao Zhou, Boning Liu, Sheng- ping Zhang, and Liqiang Nie. 2024. Gaussianavatar: Towards realistic human avatar modeling from a single video via animatable 3d gaussians. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision a...

    2024

  14. [22]

    Animesh Karnewar, Niloy J Mitra, Andrea Vedaldi, and David Novotny. 2023. Holofusion: Towards photo-realistic 3d generative modeling. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision . 22976–22985

    2023

  15. [23]

    Yanqin Jiang, Li Zhang, Jin Gao, Weimin Hu, and Yao Yao. 2023. Consistent4d: Consistent 360{\deg} dynamic object generation from monocular video. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.02848 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Black Forest Labs. 2024. FLUX: Official inference repository for FLUX.1 models. https://github.com/black-forest-labs/flux

    2024

  17. [25]

    Bernhard Kerbl, Georgios Kopanas, Thomas Leimkühler, and George Drettakis

  18. [26]

    ACM Trans

    3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering. ACM Trans. Graph. 42, 4 (2023), 139–1

    2023

  19. [27]

    Weiyu Li, Rui Chen, Xuelin Chen, and Ping Tan. 2023. Sweetdreamer: Align- ing geometric priors in 2d diffusion for consistent text-to-3d. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.02596 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Jiahao Li, Hao Tan, Kai Zhang, Zexiang Xu, Fujun Luan, Yinghao Xu, Yicong Hong, Kalyan Sunkavalli, Greg Shakhnarovich, and Sai Bi. 2023. Instant3d: Fast text-to-3d with sparse-view generation and large reconstruction model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.06214 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Jiaxing Li, Hongbo Zhao, Yijun Wang, and Jianxin Lin. 2024. Towards photo- realistic video colorization via gated color-guided image diffusion models. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia . 10891– 10900

    2024

  22. [30]

    Huan Ling, Seung Wook Kim, Antonio Torralba, Sanja Fidler, and Karsten Kreis

  23. [31]

    Yixun Liang, Xin Yang, Jiantao Lin, Haodong Li, Xiaogang Xu, and Yingcong Chen. 2024. Luciddreamer: Towards high-fidelity text-to-3d generation via interval score matching. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition . 6517–6526

    2024

  24. [32]

    Bee Lim, Sanghyun Son, Heewon Kim, Seungjun Nah, and Kyoung Mu Lee

  25. [33]

    Minghua Liu, Chong Zeng, Xinyue Wei, Ruoxi Shi, Linghao Chen, Chao Xu, Mengqi Zhang, Zhaoning Wang, Xiaoshuai Zhang, Isabella Liu, et al. 2024. Mesh- former: High-quality mesh generation with 3d-guided reconstruction model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.10198 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Ruoshi Liu, Rundi Wu, Basile Van Hoorick, Pavel Tokmakov, Sergey Zakharov, and Carl Vondrick. 2023. Zero-1-to-3: Zero-shot one image to 3d object. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision . 9298– 9309

    2023

  27. [35]

    Tianqi Liu, Zihao Huang, Zhaoxi Chen, Guangcong Wang, Shoukang Hu, Liao Shen, Huiqiang Sun, Zhiguo Cao, Wei Li, and Ziwei Liu. 2025. Free4D: Tuning- free 4D Scene Generation with Spatial-Temporal Consistency. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20785 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Isabella Liu, Hao Su, and Xiaolong Wang. 2024. Dynamic gaussians mesh: Consis- tent mesh reconstruction from monocular videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.12379 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Minghua Liu, Ruoxi Shi, Linghao Chen, Zhuoyang Zhang, Chao Xu, Xinyue Wei, Hansheng Chen, Chong Zeng, Jiayuan Gu, and Hao Su. 2024. One-2-3-45++: Fast single image to 3d objects with consistent multi-view generation and 3d diffusion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference o...

    2024

  30. [38]

    Matthew Loper, Naureen Mahmood, Javier Romero, Gerard Pons-Moll, and Michael J Black. 2023. SMPL: A skinned multi-person linear model. In Seminal Graphics Papers: Pushing the Boundaries, Volume 2 . 851–866

    2023

  31. [39]

    Yuxuan Luo, Zhengkun Rong, Lizhen Wang, Longhao Zhang, Tianshu Hu, and Yongming Zhu. 2025. DreamActor-M1: Holistic, Expressive and Robust Human Image Animation with Hybrid Guidance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.01724 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Yue Ma, Yingqing He, Xiaodong Cun, Xintao Wang, Siran Chen, Xiu Li, and Qifeng Chen. 2024. Follow your pose: Pose-guided text-to-video generation using pose-free videos. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , Vol. 38. 4117–4125

    2024

  33. [41]

    Yuan Liu, Cheng Lin, Zijiao Zeng, Xiaoxiao Long, Lingjie Liu, Taku Komura, and Wenping Wang. 2023. Syncdreamer: Generating multiview-consistent images from a single-view image. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.03453 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Xiaoxiao Long, Yuan-Chen Guo, Cheng Lin, Yuan Liu, Zhiyang Dou, Lingjie Liu, Yuexin Ma, Song-Hai Zhang, Marc Habermann, Christian Theobalt, et al. 2024. Wonder3d: Single image to 3d using cross-domain diffusion. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and P...

    2024

  35. [43]

    Zijie Pan, Jiachen Lu, Xiatian Zhu, and Li Zhang. 2023. Enhancing high- resolution 3d generation through pixel-wise gradient clipping. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.12474 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Zijie Pan, Zeyu Yang, Xiatian Zhu, and Li Zhang. 2024. Fast dynamic 3d object generation from a single-view video. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.08742 (2024). CharacterShot: Controllable and Consistent 4D Character Animation • 9

    2024

  37. [45]

    Hui En Pang, Shuai Liu, Zhongang Cai, Lei Yang, Tianwei Zhang, and Ziwei Liu. 2024. Disco4D: Disentangled 4D Human Generation and Animation from a Single Image. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.17280 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Alex Nichol, Prafulla Dhariwal, Aditya Ramesh, Pranav Shyam, Pamela Mishkin, Bob McGrew, Ilya Sutskever, and Mark Chen. 2021. Glide: Towards photorealistic image generation and editing with text-guided diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.10741 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Alexander Quinn Nichol and Prafulla Dhariwal. 2021. Improved denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 8162–8171

    2021

  40. [48]

    Hao-Yang Peng, Jia-Peng Zhang, Meng-Hao Guo, Yan-Pei Cao, and Shi-Min Hu

  41. [49]

    Ben Poole, Ajay Jain, Jonathan T Barron, and Ben Mildenhall. 2022. Dreamfusion: Text-to-3d using 2d diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14988 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Zefan Qu, Ke Xu, Gerhard Petrus Hancke, and Rynson WH Lau. 2024. LuSh- NeRF: Lighting up and Sharpening NeRFs for Low-light Scenes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.06757 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Jangho Park, Taesung Kwon, and Jong Chul Ye. 2025. Zero4D: Training-Free 4D Video Generation From Single Video Using Off-the-Shelf Video Diffusion Model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.22622 (2025)

    2025

  44. [52]

    William Peebles and Saining Xie. 2023. Scalable diffusion models with trans- formers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. 4195–4205

    2023

  45. [53]

    Jiawei Ren, Cheng Xie, Ashkan Mirzaei, Karsten Kreis, Ziwei Liu, Antonio Torralba, Sanja Fidler, Seung Wook Kim, Huan Ling, et al. 2024. L4gm: Large 4d gaussian reconstruction model. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 (2024), 56828–56858

    2024

  46. [54]

    ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 43, 4 (2024)

    CharacterGen: Efficient 3D Character Generation from Single Images with Multi-View Pose Canonicalization. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 43, 4 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1145/3658217

    2024 doi

  47. [55]

    Darius Rückert, Linus Franke, and Marc Stamminger. 2022. Adop: Approximate differentiable one-pixel point rendering. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG) 41, 4 (2022), 1–14

    2022

  48. [56]

    Kyle Sargent, Zizhang Li, Tanmay Shah, Charles Herrmann, Hong-Xing Yu, Yunzhi Zhang, Eric Ryan Chan, Dmitry Lagun, Li Fei-Fei, Deqing Sun, et al. 2023. Zeronvs: Zero-shot 360-degree view synthesis from a single real image. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.17994 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J Liu. 2020. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. Journal of machine learning research 21, 140 (2020), 1–67

    2020

  50. [58]

    Jiawei Ren, Liang Pan, Jiaxiang Tang, Chi Zhang, Ang Cao, Gang Zeng, and Ziwei Liu. 2023. Dreamgaussian4d: Generative 4d gaussian splatting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.17142 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Yukai Shi, Jianan Wang, He Cao, Boshi Tang, Xianbiao Qi, Tianyu Yang, Yukun Huang, Shilong Liu, Lei Zhang, and Heung-Yeung Shum. 2023. Toss: High- quality text-guided novel view synthesis from a single image. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.10644 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. 2015. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, Proceedings,...

    2015

  53. [61]

    Uriel Singer, Shelly Sheynin, Adam Polyak, Oron Ashual, Iurii Makarov, Filippos Kokkinos, Naman Goyal, Andrea Vedaldi, Devi Parikh, Justin Johnson, et al

  54. [62]

    Jingxiang Sun, Bo Zhang, Ruizhi Shao, Lizhen Wang, Wen Liu, Zhenda Xie, and Yebin Liu. 2023. Dreamcraft3d: Hierarchical 3d generation with bootstrapped diffusion prior. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.16818 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Ruizhi Shao, Youxin Pang, Zerong Zheng, Jingxiang Sun, and Yebin Liu. 2024. Human4dit: 360-degree human video generation with 4d diffusion transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.17405 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Ruoxi Shi, Hansheng Chen, Zhuoyang Zhang, Minghua Liu, Chao Xu, Xinyue Wei, Linghao Chen, Chong Zeng, and Hao Su. 2023. Zero123++: a single image to consistent multi-view diffusion base model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.15110 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Matthew Tancik, Pratul Srinivasan, Ben Mildenhall, Sara Fridovich-Keil, Nithin Raghavan, Utkarsh Singhal, Ravi Ramamoorthi, Jonathan Barron, and Ren Ng

  58. [66]

    Yichun Shi, Peng Wang, Jianglong Ye, Mai Long, Kejie Li, and Xiao Yang. 2023. Mvdream: Multi-view diffusion for 3d generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.16512 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Kexian Tang, Junyao Gao, Yanhong Zeng, Haodong Duan, Yanan Sun, Zhening Xing, Wenran Liu, Kaifeng Lyu, and Kai Chen. 2025. LEGO-Puzzles: How Good Are MLLMs at Multi-Step Spatial Reasoning? arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.19990 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  60. [68]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.11280 (2023)

    Text-to-4d dynamic scene generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.11280 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Thomas Unterthiner, Sjoerd van Steenkiste, Karol Kurach, Raphaël Marinier, Marcin Michalski, and Sylvain Gelly. 2019. FVD: A new metric for video genera- tion. (2019)

    2019

  62. [70]

    Wenqiang Sun, Shuo Chen, Fangfu Liu, Zilong Chen, Yueqi Duan, Jun Zhang, and Yikai Wang. 2024. Dimensionx: Create any 3d and 4d scenes from a single image with controllable video diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.04928 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Shuai Tan, Biao Gong, Xiang Wang, Shiwei Zhang, Dandan Zheng, Ruobing Zheng, Kecheng Zheng, Jingdong Chen, and Ming Yang. 2024. Animate-x: Universal character image animation with enhanced motion representation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10306 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Peng Wang and Yichun Shi. 2023. Imagedream: Image-prompt multi-view diffusion for 3d generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.02201 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Xiang Wang, Shiwei Zhang, Longxiang Tang, Yingya Zhang, Changxin Gao, Yue- huan Wang, and Nong Sang. 2025. UniAnimate-DiT: Human Image Animation with Large-Scale Video Diffusion Transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.11289 (2025)

    2025

  66. [74]

    Jiaxiang Tang, Jiawei Ren, Hang Zhou, Ziwei Liu, and Gang Zeng. 2023. Dream- gaussian: Generative gaussian splatting for efficient 3d content creation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16653 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Zhenzhi Wang, Yixuan Li, Yanhong Zeng, Youqing Fang, Yuwei Guo, Wenran Liu, Jing Tan, Kai Chen, Tianfan Xue, Bo Dai, et al. 2024. HumanVid: Demystifying Training Data for Camera-controllable Human Image Animation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.17438 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Dmitry Tochilkin, David Pankratz, Zexiang Liu, Zixuan Huang, Adam Letts, Yangguang Li, Ding Liang, Christian Laforte, Varun Jampani, and Yan-Pei Cao

  69. [77]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.02151 (2024)

    Triposr: Fast 3d object reconstruction from a single image. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.02151 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Haohan Weng, Tianyu Yang, Jianan Wang, Yu Li, Tong Zhang, CL Chen, and Lei Zhang. 2023. Consistent123: Improve consistency for one image to 3d object synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.08092 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Vikram Voleti, Chun-Han Yao, Mark Boss, Adam Letts, David Pankratz, Dmitry Tochilkin, Christian Laforte, Robin Rombach, and Varun Jampani. 2025. Sv3d: Novel multi-view synthesis and 3d generation from a single image using latent video diffusion. In European Conference on Compu...

    2025

  72. [80]

    VRoid. 2022. VRoid Hub. https://vroid.com/

    2022

  73. [81]

    Yiming Xie, Chun-Han Yao, Vikram Voleti, Huaizu Jiang, and Varun Jampani

  74. [82]

    Jiale Xu, Weihao Cheng, Yiming Gao, Xintao Wang, Shenghua Gao, and Ying Shan. 2024. Instantmesh: Efficient 3d mesh generation from a single image with sparse-view large reconstruction models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.07191 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Zhou Wang, Alan C Bovik, Hamid R Sheikh, and Eero P Simoncelli. 2004. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity.IEEE transactions on image processing 13, 4 (2004), 600–612

    2004

  76. [84]

    Ling Yang, Kaixin Zhu, Juanxi Tian, Bohan Zeng, Mingbao Lin, Hongjuan Pei, Wentao Zhang, and Shuicheng Yan. 2025. WideRange4D: Enabling High-Quality 4D Reconstruction with Wide-Range Movements and Scenes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.13435 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Zhengyi Wang, Cheng Lu, Yikai Wang, Fan Bao, Chongxuan Li, Hang Su, and Jun Zhu. 2024. Prolificdreamer: High-fidelity and diverse text-to-3d generation with variational score distillation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 (2024)

    2024

  78. [86]

    Xinyue Wei, Kai Zhang, Sai Bi, Hao Tan, Fujun Luan, Valentin Deschaintre, Kalyan Sunkavalli, Hao Su, and Zexiang Xu. 2024. MeshLRM: Large Reconstruc- tion Model for High-Quality Meshes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.12385 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Zhuoyi Yang, Jiayan Teng, Wendi Zheng, Ming Ding, Shiyu Huang, Jiazheng Xu, Yuanming Yang, Wenyi Hong, Xiaohan Zhang, Guanyu Feng, et al. 2024. Cogvideox: Text-to-video diffusion models with an expert transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06072 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Guanjun Wu, Taoran Yi, Jiemin Fang, Lingxi Xie, Xiaopeng Zhang, Wei Wei, Wenyu Liu, Qi Tian, and Xinggang Wang. 2024. 4D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Dynamic Scene Rendering. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) . 20310–20320

    2024

  81. [89]

    Zijie Wu, Chaohui Yu, Yanqin Jiang, Chenjie Cao, Fan Wang, and Xiang Bai

  82. [90]

    Taoran Yi, Jiemin Fang, Guanjun Wu, Lingxi Xie, Xiaopeng Zhang, Wenyu Liu, Qi Tian, and Xinggang Wang. 2023. Gaussiandreamer: Fast generation from text to 3d gaussian splatting with point cloud priors. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.08529 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Yuyang Yin, Dejia Xu, Zhangyang Wang, Yao Zhao, and Yunchao Wei. 2023. 4dgen: Grounded 4d content generation with spatial-temporal consistency.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.17225 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  84. [92]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.17470 (2024)

    Sv4d: Dynamic 3d content generation with multi-frame and multi-view consistency. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.17470 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Tao Yu, Zerong Zheng, Kaiwen Guo, Pengpeng Liu, Qionghai Dai, and Yebin Liu. 2021. Function4d: Real-time human volumetric capture from very sparse consumer rgbd sensors. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition . 5746–5756

    2021

  86. [94]

    Haibo Yang, Yang Chen, Yingwei Pan, Ting Yao, Zhineng Chen, Chong-Wah Ngo, and Tao Mei. 2024. Hi3D: Pursuing High-Resolution Image-to-3D Generation with Video Diffusion Models. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 6870–6879

    2024

  87. [95]

    Richard Zhang, Phillip Isola, Alexei A Efros, Eli Shechtman, and Oliver Wang

  88. [96]

    Ziyi Yang, Xinyu Gao, Wen Zhou, Shaohui Jiao, Yuqing Zhang, and Xiaogang Jin. 2024. Deformable 3d gaussians for high-fidelity monocular dynamic scene reconstruction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 20331–20341

    2024

  89. [97]

    Zeyu Yang, Zijie Pan, Chun Gu, and Li Zhang. 2024. Diffusion 2: Dynamic 3D Content Generation via Score Composition of Orthogonal Diffusion Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.02148 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Yuyang Zhao, Zhiwen Yan, Enze Xie, Lanqing Hong, Zhenguo Li, and Gim Hee Lee. 2023. Animate124: Animating one image to 4d dynamic scene. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.14603 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Zhendong Yang, Ailing Zeng, Chun Yuan, and Yu Li. 2023. Effective whole-body pose estimation with two-stages distillation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision . 4210–4220

    2023

  92. [100]

    Jianglong Ye, Peng Wang, Kejie Li, Yichun Shi, and Heng Wang. 2024. Consistent- 1-to-3: Consistent image to 3d view synthesis via geometry-aware diffusion 10 • Junyao Gao1, *, Jiaxing Li3, *, Wenran Liu2, Yanhong Zeng2, Fei Shen4, Kai Chen2, Yanan Sun2,‡ , Cairong Zhao1,‡ mode...

    2024

  93. [103]

    Lijun Yu, José Lezama, Nitesh B Gundavarapu, Luca Versari, Kihyuk Sohn, David Minnen, Yong Cheng, Vighnesh Birodkar, Agrim Gupta, Xiuye Gu, et al. 2023. Language Model Beats Diffusion–Tokenizer is Key to Visual Generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.05737 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  94. [105]

    Yifei Zeng, Yanqin Jiang, Siyu Zhu, Yuanxun Lu, Youtian Lin, Hao Zhu, Weiming Hu, Xun Cao, and Yao Yao. 2025. Stag4d: Spatial-temporal anchored generative 4d gaussians. In European Conference on Computer Vision . Springer, 163–179

    2025

  95. [108]

    Yuang Zhang, Jiaxi Gu, Li-Wen Wang, Han Wang, Junqi Cheng, Yuefeng Zhu, and Fangyuan Zou. 2024. Mimicmotion: High-quality human motion video generation with confidence-aware pose guidance.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.19680 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  96. [109]

    Hongbo Zhao, Jiaxing Li, Peiyi Zhang, Peng Xiao, Jianxin Lin, and Yijun Wang

  97. [110]

    In Proceedings of the Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Conference Conference Papers

    ColorSurge: Bringing Vibrancy and Efficiency to Automatic Video Col- orization via Dual-Branch Fusion. In Proceedings of the Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Conference Conference Papers . 1–11

  98. [112]

    Linqi Zhou, Andy Shih, Chenlin Meng, and Stefano Ermon. 2024. Dreampro- peller: Supercharge text-to-3d generation with parallel sampling. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition . 4610– 4619

    2024

  99. [113]

    Shenhao Zhu, Junming Leo Chen, Zuozhuo Dai, Zilong Dong, Yinghui Xu, Xun Cao, Yao Yao, Hao Zhu, and Siyu Zhu. 2024. Champ: Controllable and consistent human image animation with 3d parametric guidance. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 145–162. CharacterShot...

    2024

  100. [114]

    Original

    over all images, which are traversed in a bidirectional raster pattern. In addition, we employ three specialized FVD variants to evaluate video coherence at a more granular level: FVD-F, which computes FVD across frames within each view; FVD-V, which com- putes FVD across view...

  101. [2017]

    In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops

    Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops. 136–144

  102. [2018]

    In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition . 586–595

  103. [2020]

    Advances in neural information processing systems 33 (2020), 7537–7547

    Fourier features let networks learn high frequency functions in low dimensional domains. Advances in neural information processing systems 33 (2020), 7537–7547

    2020

  104. [2023]

    In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Objaverse: A universe of annotated 3d objects. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition . 13142–13153

  105. [2024]

    In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Align your gaussians: Text-to-4d with dynamic 3d gaussians and composed diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 8576–8588

  106. [2025]

    In European Conference on Computer Vision

    Sc4d: Sparse-controlled video-to-4d generation and motion transfer. In European Conference on Computer Vision . Springer, 361–379

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.