pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.07555 · v3 · submitted 2025-08-11 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.IT· cs.NI· math.IT

Multimodal Remote Inference

Keyuan Zhang , Yin Sun , Bo Ji This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 00:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.ITcs.NImath.IT
keywords multimodal remote inferenceage of informationscheduling policysemi-Markov decision processpolicy iterationerror minimizationsensor scheduling
0
0 comments X

The pith

The optimal policy for multimodal remote inference has an index-based threshold structure for two modalities and uses error-aware switching for more.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper studies the problem of scheduling transmissions from several remote sensors to minimize the inference error of a multimodal machine learning model at a central location. Because network capacity prevents sending fresh data from every sensor at once, the authors express the error as a general function of the vector of ages of information and recast the scheduling decision as a semi-Markov decision process whose state space can be reduced. They establish that the optimal policy takes an index-based threshold form when there are two modalities and, for any larger number, they give an explicit algorithm called EAST that finds the best switching and transmission decisions through multichain policy iteration. Case studies illustrate that these policies lower error relative to round-robin and greedy baselines, with the largest reported gain reaching 44.8 percent.

Core claim

For the two-modality case, we prove that the optimal policy has an index-based threshold structure. For the general multi-modality case, we develop the optimal error-aware switching-and-transmission policy (EAST), which is computed using a multichain policy iteration algorithm (MPI).

What carries the argument

The equivalent reformulation of the scheduling problem as a semi-Markov decision process with reduced state set, which exposes the chain structures that enable the index policy and the EAST algorithm.

If this is right

  • The two-modality case admits a simple threshold policy that can be precomputed from indices.
  • The EAST policy achieves the minimal inference error for arbitrary numbers of modalities.
  • Low-complexity policies such as EAT and FT trade a small increase in error for orders-of-magnitude faster computation.
  • All proposed policies outperform round-robin, greedy, and random scheduling in the reported experiments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The structural results on threshold policies could guide the design of schedulers in other systems that combine multiple data streams for a single inference task.
  • Replacing the general error function with one learned from actual model outputs on real datasets would make the policies more tailored to specific ML models.
  • The multichain policy iteration approach may extend to related problems in wireless networks where decisions involve choosing among several sources with freshness costs.

Load-bearing premise

The inference error is completely determined by the current vector of ages of information from the modalities.

What would settle it

Measuring the inference error while varying only the ages of information and checking whether it matches the assumed general function; any systematic deviation would invalidate the optimality of the derived policies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.07555 by Bo Ji, Keyuan Zhang, Yin Sun.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A multimodal remote inference system appearance of objects, LiDAR images offer depth informa￾tion [3]. To fully exploit information from multiple modalities, machine learning (ML) based fusion techniques have been widely adopted, as they can effectively extract modality￾specific information and capture cross-modal correlations us￾ing architectures such as deep neural networks [4]. Despite the advantages of… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: System model current transmission completes, the next transmission begins immediately, i.e., Sn+1 = Dn for every n. We use age of information (AoI) to quantify information freshness, defined as the time elapsed since the freshest received feature was generated [18]. For each modality m, we denote its AoI at the receiver at time t as ∆m(t) ∈ Z+, where Z+ denotes the set of positive integers. According to th… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: AoI transition during the i-th cycle under unit trans￾mission times (T1 = T2 = 1). The process has two states: (1, 2) and (2, 1). Each pair represents an AoI vector, and the number on each arrow represents the selected modality. In the reformulated SMDP, the policy is a sequence of decisions made at each restart state. Specifically, define a cycle as the period from state ∆1,re back to itself. The policy i… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Inference error vs. AoI 2 4 6 8 10 T1 2 4 6 8 10 T2 2.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.7 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.1 4.4 4.8 4.7 5.0 5.1 5.7 5.6 6.3 6.0 5.9 7.1 6.8 6.4 4 6 8 10 Average inference error (a) Index policy (ours) 2 4 6 8 10 T1 2 4 6 8 10 T2 2.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.7 2.8 3.2 3.8 4.5 4.9 8.8 8.5 8.1 7.7 7.2 11.010.2 9.4 8.7 8.0 11.710.7 9.9 9.1 8.4 4 6 8 10 Average inference error (b) Round-robin 2 4 6 8 10 T1 2 4 6 8… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We consider a remote inference system with multiple modalities, where a multimodal machine learning (ML) model performs real-time inference using features collected from remote sensors. When sensor observations evolve dynamically over time, fresh features are critical for inference tasks. However, timely delivery of features from all modalities is often infeasible under limited network resources. To address this challenge, we formulate a multimodal scheduling problem to minimize the ML model's inference error. We model this error as a general function of the Age of Information (AoI) vector, where AoI quantifies data freshness. We cast the problem as a semi-Markov decision process (SMDP) and derive an equivalent reformulation with a reduced state set. We then show that the problem has fundamentally different chain structures in the two-modality and multi-modality cases. For the two-modality case, we prove that the optimal policy has an index-based threshold structure. For the general multi-modality case (i.e., with more than two modalities), we develop the optimal error-aware switching-and-transmission policy (EAST), which is computed using a multichain policy iteration algorithm (MPI). To further reduce complexity, we also develop two low-complexity policies under special settings: the error-aware transmission policy (EAT) and the fixed threshold policy (FT). Numerical results from three case studies show that the proposed policies outperform several simple heuristics, including round-robin, greedy, and uniform random policies. In particular, EAST reduces the inference error by up to 44.8% compared with the best baseline in each case. In the five-modality case, EAT and FT reduce computation time by 6.6$\times$ and 3000$\times$, respectively, relative to EAST, while increasing the inference error by 20.2% and 38.6%, respectively.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript formulates a multimodal remote inference scheduling problem to minimize ML inference error, modeled as a general function of the Age of Information (AoI) vector. It casts the problem as a semi-Markov decision process (SMDP) with an equivalent reduced-state reformulation, proves that the optimal policy for the two-modality case has an index-based threshold structure, and for the general multi-modality case develops the Error-Aware Switching-and-Transmission (EAST) policy computed via multichain policy iteration (MPI). Low-complexity policies EAT and FT are proposed under special settings. Numerical results from three case studies show EAST reduces inference error by up to 44.8% versus baselines such as round-robin and greedy, with EAT and FT offering substantial complexity reductions in the five-modality case.

Significance. If the structural results and optimality claims are rigorously established, the work advances AoI-based scheduling for multimodal remote inference by providing an index-based threshold policy for two modalities and a practical MPI-based algorithm for larger cases. The reported error reductions and complexity savings (e.g., 3000× for FT) indicate practical utility. The reduced-state SMDP reformulation and explicit policy derivations are strengths that could support further extensions if the modeling assumptions are clarified.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and modeling section] Abstract and modeling section: The error is modeled as a 'general function' of the AoI vector with no explicit monotonicity, submodularity, or regularity conditions stated. Structural results such as index-based threshold optimality in SMDPs for scheduling typically require these conditions for the induction or coupling arguments to hold; without them, the proof of the two-modality threshold structure (central to the paper's optimality claim) may not extend to arbitrary non-monotonic error functions.
  2. [SMDP formulation and reduced-state reformulation] SMDP formulation and reduced-state reformulation: The abstract claims an equivalent reformulation with a reduced state set, but without the explicit mapping or proof that optimality is preserved under this reduction, it is difficult to confirm that the subsequent policy derivations (including EAST and the threshold result) apply to the original problem.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Numerical results section] Numerical results section: Provide more detail on the exact parameter settings, error function forms, and modality counts used in the three case studies to support reproducibility of the 44.8% gain and the 6.6×/3000× complexity claims.
  2. [Notation] Notation: Ensure consistent definition of the AoI vector and its evolution across sections; minor inconsistencies in indexing could confuse readers following the multichain policy iteration.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and the opportunity to clarify aspects of our work on multimodal remote inference. We address each major comment below, providing explanations and indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The error is modeled as a 'general function' of the AoI vector with no explicit monotonicity, submodularity, or regularity conditions stated. Structural results such as index-based threshold optimality in SMDPs for scheduling typically require these conditions for the induction or coupling arguments to hold; without them, the proof of the two-modality threshold structure (central to the paper's optimality claim) may not extend to arbitrary non-monotonic error functions.

    Authors: We acknowledge the importance of specifying regularity conditions for the structural results. Upon review, our proof for the two-modality case relies on the error function being non-decreasing in each component of the AoI vector, which is a reasonable and standard assumption for ML inference error as outdated data typically increases error. We do not assume submodularity in the two-modality proof. We will explicitly state this monotonicity assumption in the modeling section and abstract of the revised manuscript. For completely arbitrary non-monotonic functions, the threshold structure may indeed not hold, but our focus is on practical error functions that satisfy monotonicity. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The abstract claims an equivalent reformulation with a reduced state set, but without the explicit mapping or proof that optimality is preserved under this reduction, it is difficult to confirm that the subsequent policy derivations (including EAST and the threshold result) apply to the original problem.

    Authors: We appreciate this feedback on the presentation of the reduced-state reformulation. The reformulation reduces the state space by exploiting the fact that the absolute AoI values can be normalized or that certain states are equivalent under the SMDP dynamics. We will add an explicit description of the state mapping and a formal proof that the optimal value function and policies are preserved under this reduction in the revised manuscript, likely in a dedicated subsection or appendix. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses standard SMDP techniques on modeled cost

full rationale

The central claims rest on casting the inference-error minimization as an SMDP whose per-stage cost is an arbitrary function of the AoI vector, followed by an equivalent state reduction, a structural proof for the two-modality case, and multichain policy iteration for the general case. None of these steps reduce by construction to a fitted parameter, a self-defined quantity, or a self-citation chain; the optimality statements are derived from the SMDP Bellman equations and value-function properties under the stated model. Numerical comparisons to external heuristics further separate the result from tautological input. Minor self-citations may exist in the full manuscript but are not load-bearing for the reported theorems.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the assumption that inference error is expressible as a general function of the AoI vector and that the dynamics admit an SMDP reformulation with reduced states; no explicit free parameters or new invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Inference error can be modeled as a general function of the AoI vector
    Directly stated as the modeling step that enables the optimization objective.
  • domain assumption The scheduling problem admits an equivalent SMDP reformulation with reduced state set
    Invoked to justify tractable policy derivation for both two- and multi-modality cases.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5866 in / 1454 out tokens · 41785 ms · 2026-05-19T00:24:46.918572+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

25 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Timely communications for remote inference,

    M. K. C. Shisher, Y . Sun, and I.-H. Hou, “Timely communications for remote inference,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 3824–3839, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    A survey of traffic prediction: from spatio-temporal data to intelligent transportation,

    H. Yuan and G. Li, “A survey of traffic prediction: from spatio-temporal data to intelligent transportation,” Data Science and Engineering, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 63–85, 2021

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    3d object tracking using rgb and lidar data,

    A. Asvadi, P. Gir ˜ao, P. Peixoto, and U. Nunes, “3d object tracking using rgb and lidar data,” in IEEE ITSC, 2016, pp. 1255–1260

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Foundations & trends in mul- timodal machine learning: Principles, challenges, and open questions,

    P. P. Liang, A. Zadeh, and L.-P. Morency, “Foundations & trends in mul- timodal machine learning: Principles, challenges, and open questions,” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 1–42, Jun. 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    From freshness to effectiveness: Goal-oriented sampling for remote decision making,

    A. Li, S. Wu, G. C. Lee, and S. Sun, “From freshness to effectiveness: Goal-oriented sampling for remote decision making,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.19507, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    The age of correlated features in supervised learning based forecasting,

    M. K. Chowdhury Shisher, H. Qin, L. Yang, F. Yan, and Y . Sun, “The age of correlated features in supervised learning based forecasting,” in IEEE INFOCOM Workshops, 2021, pp. 1–8

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    How does data freshness affect real-time supervised learning?

    M. K. C. Shisher and Y . Sun, “How does data freshness affect real-time supervised learning?” in ACM MobiHoc, 2022, p. 31–40

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Real-time status: How often should one update?

    S. Kaul, R. Yates, and M. Gruteser, “Real-time status: How often should one update?” in IEEE INFOCOM, 2012, pp. 2731–2735

    work page 2012

  9. [9]

    Age of information: An introduction and survey,

    R. D. Yates, Y . Sun, D. R. Brown, S. K. Kaul, E. Modiano, and S. Ulukus, “Age of information: An introduction and survey,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1183– 1210, 2021

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    Sampling for data freshness optimization: Non- linear age functions,

    Y . Sun and B. Cyr, “Sampling for data freshness optimization: Non- linear age functions,” Journal of Communications and Networks, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 204–219, 2019

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    The age of incorrect information: A new performance metric for status updates,

    A. Maatouk, S. Kriouile, M. Assaad, and A. Ephremides, “The age of incorrect information: A new performance metric for status updates,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., vol. 28, no. 5, p. 2215–2228, 2020

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Toward goal- oriented semantic communications: New metrics, framework, and open challenges,

    A. Li, S. Wu, S. Meng, R. Lu, S. Sun, and Q. Zhang, “Toward goal- oriented semantic communications: New metrics, framework, and open challenges,” IEEE Wireless Communications , vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 238– 245, 2024

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Learning and communications co-design for remote inference systems: Feature length selection and transmission scheduling,

    M. K. C. Shisher, B. Ji, I.-H. Hou, and Y . Sun, “Learning and communications co-design for remote inference systems: Feature length selection and transmission scheduling,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory , pp. 524–538, 2023

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Age-optimal updates of multiple information flows,

    Y . Sun, E. Uysal-Biyikoglu, and S. Kompella, “Age-optimal updates of multiple information flows,” in IEEE INFOCOM Workshops, 2018, pp. 136–141

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    Minimizing the age of information in broadcast wireless networks,

    I. Kadota, E. Uysal-Biyikoglu, R. Singh, and E. Modiano, “Minimizing the age of information in broadcast wireless networks,” in 54th Allerton, 2016, pp. 844–851

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Optimizing age of information with correlated sources,

    V . Tripathi and E. Modiano, “Optimizing age of information with correlated sources,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking , vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 4660–4675, 2024

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    On the age of information in internet of things systems with correlated devices,

    B. Zhou and W. Saad, “On the age of information in internet of things systems with correlated devices,” in IEEE GLOBECOM, 2020, pp. 1–6

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    Update or wait: How to keep your data fresh,

    Y . Sun, E. Uysal-Biyikoglu, R. D. Yates, C. E. Koksal, and N. B. Shroff, “Update or wait: How to keep your data fresh,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 63, no. 11, pp. 7492–7508, 2017

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    M. L. Puterman, Markov decision processes: discrete stochastic dynamic programming. John Wiley & Sons, 2014

    work page 2014

  20. [20]

    Sampling and remote estimation for the ornstein-uhlenbeck process through queues: Age of information and beyond,

    T. Z. Ornee and Y . Sun, “Sampling and remote estimation for the ornstein-uhlenbeck process through queues: Age of information and beyond,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking , vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1962–1975, 2021

    work page 1962

  21. [21]

    Average cost semi-markov decision processes,

    S. M. Ross, “Average cost semi-markov decision processes,” Journal of Applied Probability, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 649–656, 1970

    work page 1970

  22. [22]

    R. G. Bartle and D. R. Sherbert, Introduction to real analysis , 4th ed. Wiley, 2011

    work page 2011

  23. [23]

    Scheduling two gauss–markov systems: An optimal solution for remote state estimation under bandwidth constraint,

    L. Shi and H. Zhang, “Scheduling two gauss–markov systems: An optimal solution for remote state estimation under bandwidth constraint,” IEEE Trans on Signal Processing , vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 2038–2042, 2012

    work page 2038

  24. [24]

    Gymnasium: A Standard Interface for Reinforcement Learning Environments

    M. Towers, A. Kwiatkowski, J. Terry, J. U. Balis, G. De Cola, T. Deleu, M. Goul ˜ao, A. Kallinteris, M. Krimmel, A. KG et al. , “Gymnasium: A standard interface for reinforcement learning environments,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.17032, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Fork: A forward-looking actor for model-free reinforcement learning,

    H. Wei and L. Ying, “Fork: A forward-looking actor for model-free reinforcement learning,” in IEEE CDC, 2021, pp. 1554–1559. APPENDIX PROOF OF PROPOSITION 2 Recall two definitions. For every β, Problem OPT-β is min τ ∈{0,1,...,τmax} [Cm(τ) − τ Tmβ], ∀m ∈ {1, 2}. And for θ ∈ { 0, 1, . . . , τmax − 1}, the index function γm of modality m, defined in Eq. (4)...

    work page 2021